This Video DESTROYS the Atheistic Worldview

This video DESTROYS the atheistic worldview. In this presentation, Ken Ham exposes several of the biggest issues with atheism. He highlights the complexity of DNA, the remarkable amount of evidence we have for the biblical flood, and more!
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

[@giak7525]

This format with graphics makes it a lot easier to watch through the whole video. please keep it up

[@AdventureCamOutdoors]

Agreed

[@betsieswartz]

No graphics can make me stomach this revolting content.

[@zanleekain117]

For those of us that are visual learners, it definitely helps. 😊

[@AdventureCamOutdoors]

@@betsieswartz yet here you are

[@22190971]

Doesn’t help - it’s a tough watch- and the worst thing is that people believe it and think it’s fact - and it reinforces their delusions

[@Big88Country]

Thank you all for this! I hope I can get my brain to wrap around all of this so I can also let others know the truth! GOD Bless you all!!!

[@bonnielucas3244]

There's so much astonishing order in the things we take for granted every day. Air, water, our bodies animals, and plants the weather and seasons

[@JB-yb4wn]

Yes, that piece of dog poo on the sidewalk was obviously designed, no way that could be random.

[@stevendwyer3652]

​@@JB-yb4wncome on, they're right. There's so much wonder in the world it's clearly evidence of the creation of beauty by science! 😅

[@drillyourarguments]

@@JB-yb4wn Mockers and scoffers. The Bible true yet again.

[@drillyourarguments]

@@JB-yb4wn God created the processes that dogs use. If evolution is true, how would animals even excrete waste? Evolution has so many problems with it and holes in it, its not even funny.

[@RitmosMC]

Obviously!!! After all, those useless organs in the human body that do literally nothing and hog resources are totally beautiful and god-given, and obviously NOT the process of random mutations and natural selection. That would be silly!! 😉

[@isaiahkelly9608]

Pastor Bob Enyart of Denver Bible Church took a few people to Mount Saint Helens shortly after it blew up. He was able to bring back some things like Pumas, and other rocks from the site in a Gorge around the Mount Saint Helens site. He decided to take some of the rocks and send them to Laboratories to find out when they were formed. Now when one laboratory comes up with their answers on when they were formed, they carefully repackage the rocks and send them to four other Laboratories to see if their results are synonymous. When this was all said and done those rocks came back to the original laboratory that Bob took them to. When Bob talked to the scientist he originally gave the rocks to, he asked him, so how old are these rocks? When were they formed? The scientist said all the data from all the Laboratories State they were formed millions of years ago give or take a few million years. Then the scientists asked Bob where did you get these rocks? Bob said at Mount Saint Helens about 2 weeks ago! It left those evolutionary scientists absolutely speechless.

[@nathanwhite704]

Cool story bro. That obviously didn’t happen.

[@isaiahkelly9608]

@@nathanwhite704 well you wouldn't know because you weren't there but whatever

[@nathanwhite704]

@@isaiahkelly9608 and you broke the 9th commandment with that story. It’s creationist propaganda. In reality the creationists did faulty research themselves using k-ar dating which was the equivalent of using a meat thermometer to measure how tall a person is.

[@globalcoupledances]

"evolutionary scientists"? Age of rock are measured from the moment liquid lava becoming solid rock. Volcanic bombs are older, from earlier eruption

[@eriolduterion8855]

FYI a change of state from liquid to solid does NOT change the "age" of the material. OBVIOUSLY. Think of water and ice in your refrigerator and glass at dinner.

[@JESUSISKINGOFKINGSLORDOFLORDS]

This is so awesome 👏 bravo brother, thank you for this, may God Bless you for this ❤in Jesus Christ name Amen

[@youandiaregonnafacegodonju5567]

christ is king!!

[@tarkus42]

"This is so awesome thank you for supporting my cognitive biases, I really needed someone to tell me exactly what I wanted to hear instead of facts and the truth! God bless echo chambers!!!"

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@tarkus42 perhaps you should let the echo go further into your brain. You may learn something. 😉🙏✝️

[@eigenvalue5775]

​@@newcreationinchrist1423 Evilutionists: "You Creationists don't know science! We do! However, we could not empirically prove the 'Missing Link,' so we dropped that like a hot potato! Now, we have the 'common ancestor.' However, again, we can't prove it empirically, so we'll be dropping that, too! We will make up the next one and call it, OONGALA-COONGALA-BOONGALA-WOO! Try and debunk that!"

[@tarkus42]

​@@newcreationinchrist1423 Thanks you for confirming that your world view is artificially programmed. Indoctrination via fear and group control "Cult behaviour" is a sad place to find yourself. Perhaps one day you will read your second book, and start to build an appreciation for the world around you? ? Nah, lets be honest... You haven't read your first book yet as the fastest way to the truth is to read the bible without your thumb up your bum and your brain in neutral. It is easy... You read a page then you simply say to yourself, does that sound reasonable or is it total hogwash!!!

[@theriveroffaith852]

When you look at megalithic structures you cannot conclude the people that built them were dumber than we are today. And therefore, you can't conclude they were made naturally over the process of millions of years, because their architecture was extremely complex. The more complex something is, the higher the chance it was created by a designer and the lesser chance that it was randomly generated overtime.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

As attested by Gen 11:6-8 And the Lord said, indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing will be withheld from them. (8) So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of the earth... The evidence of this is the megalithic structures all over the world. YT: Examples of Ancient Megalithic Technology Around the World and The World's Most Enormous Ancient Megaliths, Yangshan Quarry China. Baalbek Lebanon

[@ramonbenitez1323]

No scientist today will tell you that ancient man wasn’t smart these people love to use outdated information to try to prove their point that has already been disproven time and time again

[@Gek1177]

That's nonsense buddy, just because megalothic structures got built doesn't mean people have to have been designed. That's a complete non-sequiter.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

@@Gek1177 What? It means they were more unsophisticated, primitive, neanderthal types? Not possibly evidence for being created, genetically, physically and intellectually very good. Still early in the stages of accumulating genetic, adverse mutations, the loss of information.

[@Inmate533]

@@Gek1177You 100% missed the point.

[@stevenshumate3430]

As an atheist this hardly makes an impression other than the utter desperation for those from the borrowed fiction of the supernatural deity. The heavens are silent the promised return has failed. It is folly, this fable.

[@Spyros_SP]

Your comment has no debunking, just meaningless words.

[@henryfrancis9533]

Folly and fable is what I would describe what you typed above.

[@valekayttaja7518]

"The heavens are silent the promised return has failed. It is folly, this fable." Let me quote Bible. 2. Peter's letter, chapter 3, verses 3-6 and 9-10: 3Most importantly, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires.a 4“Where is the promise of His coming?” they will ask. “Ever since our fathers fell asleep, everything continues as it has from the beginning of creation.” 5But they deliberately overlook the fact that long ago by God’s word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water, 6through which the world of that time perished in the flood. 9The Lord is not slow in keeping His promise as some understand slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance. 10But the Day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar, the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and its works will be laid bare. Matthew chapter 24, verses 37-39: 37As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark. 39And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.

[@a-terrible-fate532]

I think he believed that there is a creator, but he did not want to face it because of his human pride.

[@tone9358]

Richard was entertaining the idea of how a god would have probably made life & where to look for that evidence if his hypothesis was the case. Not that he believes that to be the case.

[@eduardoguterres2325]

The grand proud is the one who thought he could choose the true God, but the fact that it is impossible - just to choose a kind of fresh leefygreens sometimes you couldn't do it the right way. The truth is that if you choose the right God, it is because He had first chosen you. That is the true christian, a very humble person who wants to share the word of God the Trinity.

[@Yipper64]

@@tone9358 Yeah that's the only issue I have with this video, they wherent interpreting that argument correctly. Its sort of a "well even if we did find a signature, that doesnt mean it was God it could be some other hypothetical intelligent race" Which, in my opinion doesnt really address the question, but yeah. The point he was making didnt imply his own belief in this concept, it was just taking the hypothetical and raising an argument against it.

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@tone9358 and yet had no other explanation. Could have been and yet no other explanation seems possible. If there were a naturalistic explanation for it he would have said that, instead of saying what he did. When asked specifically how it could happen that was the only answer he came up with. Makes one wonder.

[@leroyjenkins3744]

@@zerosteel0123he was answering a hypothetical question. He doesn’t believe aliens made humans. Also that question that was asked to him where he pauses is cut very deceptively. He obviously didn’t just sit there dumbfounded. They cut it like that to make it seem like he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He has a PhD in biology. He knows what he’s talking about

[@MO51MARRIED6yrAISHA]

An Atheist is like a fish in a deep wide ocean looking EVERYWHERE for evidence of water..

[@ldgrittmanpeanutsfluffy6754]

👍👍

[@CaptainFantastic222]

It’s not that I don’t believe there is no evidence for the existence of a god or gods, I just don’t find the evidence convincing enough to warrant belief

[@user-jf5qw6vg3h]

@@CaptainFantastic222 ok think about this: its a historical fact that Jews were enslaved by Egypt, and that they were forced to go to Egypt as slaves, the Pharaoh wanted to erradicate them, yet the Jews survived, how? There are only 2 answers avalible, one is of course God, the other is that Moses was a wizard, both are rejected by Atheism, so Atheism can't explain how Jews survived Egypt. Apostle Peter was crucified upside down and murdered, he himself demanded this sentance, why would he want to die so horribly for a lie? 2 women were the first to witness the empty grave, woman's witnesses were not recognised as legitimate, so why would anyone make up a lie using women? And most notably: ideas and people get followers based on what they preach and how they themselves live by their ideas, for example Buddha preached patience, and Buddha was a very patient person himself, that's why he became popular. Jesus preached miraculous salvation, the only way to prove this is by doing miracles. And consider that Jesus was born in a Jewish environment where the slightest heresy against the Rabbis and Judaism was met with horrible punishments, so how did Jesus live 33 years while preaching something against the Rabbis?

[@avgejoeschmoe2027]

@@CaptainFantastic222 holding onto the fairy tale of evolution now is like being tossed in with the Flat Earthers. The complexity of the genome itself is evidence of a Supreme Designer

[@ivanbraginsky8224]

@@user-jf5qw6vg3h *ok think about this: its a historical fact that Jews were enslaved by Egypt,* Not really, no. In fact, even rabbinical scholars are no agreeing that a literal reading of the Exodus isn't all that accurate. Especially when the time y'all usually want for that story was back when Egypt has directly conquered the lands that the Hebrews were supposed to have fled to.

[@arturkarpinski164]

God Bless you brother

[@natazer]

We were created to be instruments of worship and praise to our Creator. It took me almost 50 years to realize that. Thank you God and the book of Romans for the deep spiritual conviction! The first half of my life was serving myself, the second half is serving the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

[@lisagreechan9088]

Amen brother 🙏 Thats exactly right 🙏 we were made to worship and glorify the Almighty 🙌 A hard pill to swallow for many…pride stands in their way

[@skueky8181]

Amen!

[@marcj3682]

"The first half of my life was serving myself," When you discover the truth, you know! God bless, praise Yah!

[@stephenolan5539]

Why would it take 50 years if it was true?

[@jdoe9683]

“instrument of worship” So your God is just selfish like a monster, he created minions or slaves to serve him? I can’t believe this is said by people who say they love their God and still got agreement in the comments. Unbelievable.

[@shadowlazers]

We say ..we don't know..that called honesty

[@BenDover-mw6ic]

Rosalind Franklin was actually the first to discover the double helix structure using X-Ray to photograph it. She died of radiation in her 40’s and was not credited for the discovery. Interesting stuff 😮

[@yooperlooper]

BRAVO!! 10 thumbs up!

[@RitmosMC]

More like “BOO!! 10 dumbs down!” This guy thinks he knows more about science then every scientist who studies it, and it’s depressing that nearly everyone in these comments believes him

[@revv45acp71]

This one of the most helpful and important videos I have ever seen!

[@christopheespic]

Wow.... I feel sad for you.

[@andygraham7218]

@christopheespic Yea me to, he must not have seen any of the other great videos these guys make.

[@christopheespic]

​@@andygraham7218🙄🙄

[@andrewmuhm8785]

Well mr ken ham your in a good mood today your speaking faster then light

[@agnesjasmine1054]

Great video! Thanks and congratulations. Very well presented ❤.

[@RitmosMC]

This is some of the most poorly presented bull crap ever lol, I’m firmly convinced this guy doesn’t understand evolution in the slightest

[@betsieswartz]

@@RitmosMCW

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@RitmosMC WELL then-----by ALL MEANS....EXPLAIN!! I'd LOVE to Study your definition thereof, my friend!

[@RitmosMC]

​ @raygsbrelcik5578 Deal 1. He claims that DNA supports God's existence because DNA is not info itself without a language, and that this language must've been created by God. This is a misunderstanding of DNA on a very basic level. If you throw a ball, you're not sending the ball secret encrypted messages in a hidden language, you're just causing a reaction that, due to the laws of our universe, causes the ball the move. As such, although it can be helpful to imagine DNA as a language, this is simply not true. At its core level, DNA is just molecules arranged in a way so that when other molecules interact with it, it does certain things. This requires no secret languages or intelligent beings, it's simply how the universe works. 2. I think for a second there he started talking about how DNA only comes from DNA and can't come from nonliving matter? Yes, it is true that scientists aren't 100% sure how the first life formed, but this doesn't mean you can just god-of-the-gaps your way in and claim it proves your God. The ancient Greeks didn't understand lightning, they guessed that it was a god, and they were wrong. Why is now any different? It then spends multiple minutes rambling about DNA being a language with God the author, yada yada. Yeah no, as I said, although it's similar to a language, DNA is really nothing more than chemicals arranged in a way that, under the right circumstances, creates life. 4. He then says life is too complicated to be formed by natural processes. Uh, no, life today is extremely complicated, but the very first life forms were extremely simple, simple enough that certain chemical reactions with a bit of luck could easily form it. 5. Then he says how life requires information, and matter "never produces information," which makes me think this guy literally has no idea what he's talking about. If a rock rolls into a pond, it creates ripples. These ripples are obviously information- they can be observed and measured, and they weren't there before you threw the rock. Does this mean that rocks are secretly powered by God? Of course not, the information arose as a result of the unique interactions between the rock and its environment. Same with DNA. Yaps about the same stuff a while longer, yada yada yada yada… *yawns* 6. Shows a clip of Richard Dawkins not responding to a question about how new information evolves in matter, where he blanks out. Woah, an old guy blanks out for 5 seconds?! Darn, our entire theory is out the window! Might as well throw the research in the trash right now!! …like what is this dude on By the way, in case you're wondering what and acceptable answer would've been... uh, mutations? That's kinda how evolution works. Mutations are born and selected upon by environmental pressures, bringing about changes in a species over generations. Nothing hard to understand about that. This is elementary school level science, and I don't understand why this man can't grasp it. 7. I really don't know what Dawkins was talking about but even if that is what he meant, 1 dude saying something that vaguely aligns with what you believe doesn't mean a darn thing. We could have every single scientist in the world suddenly say that evolution is fake and it wouldn't change the fact that it isn't. Maybe Dawkins genuinely thinks this, maybe he has no idea what he's saying, maybe he's just crazy. I don't know, and I don't really care. 8. He says that atheists don't have evidence for evolution... uh, we do? Like, has this guy ever been to, I don't know, a school? Fossil records, genetics, radiometric dating, every bit of evidence we can possibly find supports the theory. 9. He says that the Bible "makes sense of the world..." yeah, this is funny by now. He's saying a story about worldwide floods, talking snakes, and magic powers is a good explanation for reality? 10. He then claims we have good evidence of Noah's flood because we have fossils deposited by water all over the Earth. Uh, no, it just happens that the primary method of fossilization involves the fossil being submerged in water. Also, if a flood buried the fossils, wouldn't we expect them to be all mixed up in different layers? Why do fossils get more complex the higher and more recent they are? If it was all from a flood, we would certainly expect the water to mix them all around. He then talks about how his view of reality somehow supports the formation of the Grand Canyon? Like what 11. Then he says that Mt. Saint Helens produced large geologic changes over a short period of time. Yes, extremely large events can produce changes to the surface in a small area around them. Remember though, eruptions like this are quite rare, and only effect very small areas. For the incredible geology we have worldwide to form, it would require these types of events to be occurring for, you guessed it, millions of years. Also, may I ask, how does this man suggest all the water appeared? The Earth doesn't contain anywhere even remotely close to the amount of water described in the Bible. Did God just, like, give the clouds magic infinite water powers, and then suck the water back into heaven when he was done or something? 12. The video says that modern rivers don't generally dig into the Earth. Uh, what? Source please? Like what? This guy is just making up stuff at this point. AND THEN THIS IS SO FUNNY LOL LIKE 30 SECONDS LATER HE SAYS THAT RAINSTORMS CAN CREATE MINIATURE CANYONS!!! LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WHAT IS THIS GUY ON, HE LITERALLY CALLS IT FALSE WHEN IT SUPPORTS SCIENCE AND TRUE WHEN IT SUPPORTS HIM!!! LOL SERIOUSLY WHAT THE HECK LOL "Modern rivers don't generally cut downward into the solid rock" "A rainstorm can create miniature canyons in only minutes" Man you just can't make this up xD Then he says a bunch of nonsense about how canyons only form during "catastrophic processes" again, source please? Sir, you are not a geologist, please stop pretending... He names a bunch more perfectly normal geologic processes and says they somehow support Noah's flood... 13. FINALLY we're done with geology. OK, now he's saying that fossils only form over short periods of time. Again, source please? Also, just cause stuff can fossilize fast doesn't mean that instantly proves the Earth is some 6000 years old. Alright, I think I've said enough. If there's any more of his nonsense you want me to explain, feel free to ask.

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@RitmosMC HELLO??

[@JacoBecker]

Wonderful! Thank you for sharing! Many Blessings to all folks involved.

[@NewyorkRicanSoulPodcast]

People have free will and unfortunately not everyone will agree on everything. Prayers for those hard hearted💔 people who will ignore all of the signs that God their creator is giving them. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@RitmosMC]

Ah yes, like the dozens of different signs he has given us that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old? Because those signs totally point towards creationism, yeah yeah sure.

[@KGrace0001]

⁠​⁠@@RitmosMChow are scientists able to measure the time of which something buried in the ground exactly?

[@RitmosMC]

@@KGrace0001 Radioactive dating is the main method scientists use. Also, if we're talking about the entire universe, not just our planet, we know it's billions of years old for many reasons. The fact that our own galaxy is over a 100,000 light years wide means that if the universe were younger than that, light wouldn't have been able to reach us yet, and we couldn't even fully see our own galaxy. There's also many other methods. Point is, this isn't anything new or controversial, about 97% of scientists agree that the earth and universe are very, very old.

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@RitmosMC NEWSFLASH!!! There IS NO truly accurate way of Determining the AGE of Rocks, OR, Sedimentation beyond 40..... 50,000 years. It's all nothing more than "Circular Reasoning," my Friend. The Geology of this Earth has gone through TONS of Change. Uniformitarianism is simply a man--made THEORY, and, aside from being impossible to PROVE----It is not only Highly unlike ly-----it is completely ILLOGICAL!

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@RitmosMC AND-----The Galaxy itself may well be Millions of Years in age----however, the Earth itself demonstrates a MUCH YOUNGER age. Did you know----it does NOT take Thousands of years, much less, MILLIONS to form a Fossil? In Fact, under the right conditions, They can be formed within a few MONTHS. Laboratory experiments have been conducted, and this was Discovered to be the case. All that is needed, is for the animal, Dead, or alive.....to be Quickly COMPRESSED, and Sealed in the Sediment, and DRIED before the animal decomposes. The VAST majority of dead animals would be CONSUMED by Predators, and what's left, the Weather would Consume. We would only have a FRACTION of the fossils we find, if the Evolution mold was True. NOTE; All across the Globe, there are these Massive Fossil burial Grounds, like the one in Alberta Canada. The total area stretches out for HUNDREDS of miles. Archeologists have discovered 9,000 animals buried there! NOTE; Before they were all discovered, the Sediment was "DATED" at "MILLIONS of years old," and Yet----The Fossils that were found are the VERY SAME we see Today------NO CHANGE!! PLUS; Secular Science will not TELL you THIS....But found right along side of these 'Conventional' animals, were a number of Fossils of Smaller Dinosaurs. INTERESTING NOTE; These "MOUNDS" that are found all over the World, carry a Common Theme among them. All of the animals are Twisted, and Contorted into Extreme positions, as if some GREAT FORCE HURLED them unceremoniously against hillsides, and enbank ments. In Fact, this Great Force must have come Quite RAPIDLY because we find Many of these animals in the midst of doing things like; Killing their Prey, giving birth.....even COPULATING, YES----This is FACT!

[@benparker1822]

It looks like the debate over Noah's Flood has been going on for ages if Peter is talking about it in his epistle.

[@stevepierce6467]

All the early christians were well versed in even older Middle Eastern folklore and mythology, which included flood stories. That massive catastrophic floods occurred (and still occur) is beyond dispute. A really bad one in the misty dawn of human civilization would certainly have created a traumatic impact great enough for the event to be memorialized in the local lore. But still there is no evidence of a worldwide flood event.

[@rstevewarmorycom]

It's BEEN obvious garbage since it was first written!! It smelled like a lie, a cartoon told to entertain gullible children!!

[@fatmayo2293]

Everything I have learned says yes their was a wordlwide flood. Water in different sediments of rock, shells and fish bones found on high mountains that are inland. A variety of people from different civilizations have reported a flood as well.

[@rstevewarmorycom]

@@fatmayo2293 That's just wishful believing, you were raised with that myth, and so you PREFER to believe the other believers who are actually NOT real scientists and lifelong experts in Geology, ALL of which REAL Geologists will tell you exactly the same evidence that proves it never happened. I am a scientist, a physicist, electronic engineer, computer designer, and an Evolutionary genetics programmer. I hate to see you being scammed by these brainwashed religion nuts and liars! That myth comes from previous local empires who had similar children's fables from which the Noah myth was itself stolen. The story of Gilgamesh, and the story of Utna Pishtim before it are the ancestors of the Noah/Ark/Flood story, all with different gods and differing explanations, going back three thousannd years, we have then on clay tablets written in cunieform with a wedge stylus! Such are found in ancient collections of popular children's stories, they are not holy or magically true! The jews simply stole it to twist into their torah the way THEY wanted it!! If you don't have much in your holy book, then you grab stuff to fill it out so people will believe in it!!

[@stevepierce6467]

@@fatmayo2293 People have been reporting floods for as long as there have been people and floods. Floods are so widespread that it would be surprising that memories of a particularly catastrophic one would not have formed part of the collective mythic memory of every human group on the planet. Water has been found in aquifers all over the planet, possible evidence for floods at one time or another, or for surface water seeping into underground spaces. We now know, as our ancient ancestors did not, that geologic uplift is responsible for places once deep underwater are now dry plains or even mountains. My part of the Midwest was once a sea, and labeled in my youth (the 50s) as The Great Inland Sea. Sorry, no evidence for a single world-wide flood. And actually considerable evidence for NO worldwide flood: in northeast Nebraska there is a site called Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park. Fossils here from 12,000,000 years ago show no signs of ever having been flooded. Deep underground caves in Europe (Lascaux, Altamira) have never been flooded and had their wall art from 25,000 to 40,000 years ago damaged.

[@iainrae6159]

My five year old has asked me how old the earth is, and how did Duck billed platypus make the 14000mile journey to the Ark. They die in salt water.

[@t-bonewtf]

Your five year old is an intelligent and reasonable individual. It's a shame the video author isn't more like your child.

[@iainrae6159]

@@t-bonewtf Thanks, appreciate your comment. The founding fathers of USA were sensible to separate church and state.

[@jounisuninen]

Of course you knew of Earth's history and told to your five year old that at that time there was the Pangaia i.e. the uniform continent. Well done.

[@lizd2943]

Pangaea broke apart around 176,000,000 years ago. Waaaaaayyyy before the platypus came along.@@jounisuninen

[@iainrae6159]

​@@jounisuninen So how long ago was this period in the earth's history? My creationist local vicar believes the earth is 6000 years old, bless his cotton socks.

[@marycorzette6562]

Very well taught. I learned something. It's lovely..thank you All. For helping us understand the Bible so much better. God bless the staff of this channel 🙏❤

[@burntgod7165]

You're better off learning from actual working scientists. Maybe Francis Collins. He is an evangelical Christian. He was also head of the human genome project. They decoded the human genome, actually looked inside it. Collins said what he saw in there was that our ancestry is not human, and we share it with the rest of life. Collins is a geneticist. Is Ham? Do you think Ham and his colleagues have looked inside the human genome? Do you think they know more than Collins?

[@user-hj8yh2kh5s]

@@burntgod7165 Do you actually know what a double Helix is better known as Jacob's ladder

[@burntgod7165]

@@user-hj8yh2kh5s So what? It is a metaphor. And seeing as you don't know how to punctuate, you're not likely to grasp that, either. You've not countered the evidence the human genome project confirmed.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@burntgod7165 Well reading all that evidence would take away from valuable window licking time.

[@burntgod7165]

@@JB-yb4wn Do you want to try again to be grownup?

[@ChristmasPierce]

This is an epic presentation! 🎉❤👏🏻

[@JB-yb4wn]

I know, the way Ken can pack in so many lies and misinformation and just pure ignorance is certainly epic.

[@RitmosMC]

Didn’t know trying to debunk scientific fact based off your own beliefs and misunderstandings was considered “epic…”

[@sandicmxr]

Mount St Helens was still awe inspiring that november. Flew quite close to it in november that year. God gives us evidence.

[@stevepierce6467]

Yes, evidence that volcanoes exist, and sometimes erupt. So now we have definitive, god-given proof of evolution: Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska is where they found whole flocks of several now-extinct species of animals who were buried by ash from a volcanic eruption 12,000,000 years ago. All of these animals are ancestors of animals alive today. Hallelujah!!! Amen.

[@rstevewarmorycom]

That's NOT evidence of "god" but of the molten core of our planet!!

[@stevepierce6467]

@@rstevewarmorycom Right on!

[@rstevewarmorycom]

@@stevepierce6467 It's a lot of work playing Whack-a-Mole with liars!!

[@stevepierce6467]

@@rstevewarmorycom Especially hard with the people who lie to themselves. They are so indoctrinated by the bible-thumping part of their upbringing that they become unaware of the terrible contortions they must undergo to reject one part of modern science while blithely accepting most others, some, like medicine and crop production, heavily based on evolution.

[@robertpodbery242]

One of the christian "rules" is honesty. Why do those who promote this cult always lie, I used to think they just were not clever enough to see the truth, now I am not so sure

[@stevepierce6467]

They lie because it is so profitable to do so!

[@charmainethomas751]

What they lie about?

[@stevepierce6467]

@@charmainethomas751 Let's see.....the non-existent evidence for a worldwide flood, the idea that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, the idea that DNA could never have been less complex than it is now, the idea that changes in DBA cannot produce new species over time, the idea that only a short time has produced everything we see when it is conclusive that evolution has happened for billions of years, the idea that complex-appearing things like mountains and trees and eyes could not have happened without a designer creator god...... Need I say more? Remember, Kenneth Copeland now has a personal fortune of 3/4 of a BILLION dollars, all from donations from willing suckers.

[@robertpodbery242]

@@charmainethomas751 How much time have you got, I have explained myself many times to people like you, never had a thank you or any honest rebuttal, I dont think you want to know, but if you do, just google it. there are literally hundreds of examples

[@Florida79578]

​@@charmainethomas751everything

[@stevenuzzell7980]

I had a friend at Fort Polk, LA that said he was on earthen dam and the water was right at the top of the dam. He dragged a stick across the dam to form a trickle of water. He went on playing. Before the day was over his little atream had drained the pond . Think what would happen on a larger scale. Think about this high pressure water can cut steel.

[@betsieswartz]

Do you realize how unbelievable that is? Just like everything in this video, and the Bible on top of that, this comment is completely untrue with no evidence to back it up, is poorly written, and only a fool would believe it.

[@stevepierce6467]

Flowing water can move earth quickly. Flowing water carrying rocks can cut slowly through solid granite, Water at industrially high pressure can cut steel. Over millions of years, flowing water can carve a canyon.

[@judyswiderski2682]

​@@stevepierce6467 Is that what Mt Helena showed?

[@stevepierce6467]

@@judyswiderski2682 I don't know anything about Mt Helena. Mount St Helens is a volcano and I have no idea what connection it has to the short- and long-term effects of water on rock.

[@judyswiderski2682]

@@stevepierce6467 I just saw a video on it and others had not. There are two videos called Mt St Helena and the other Four Lessons From the Mount St. Helena Eruption. There are amazing things around it. Thank you for asking.

[@lalaland962]

Excellent!

[@betsieswartz]

No

[@user-rl1fc2wv3o]

So, I'm sorry for the wall of text that is about to follow but after watching your video, (more than once) there are some points that need to be addressed and I've made my notes below if you are interested in them. To note, I am agnostic, I find there is much missing in science as well as in religious texts but I try to understand as much as i can and keep an open mind about most things. I do feel that you could make a very interesting video about nothing else than the absolute morality topic at the end of this video, but I've made an interesting comment on that myself in the notes below. This didn't shatter my worldview but also didn't really tell me anything new. My notes. 02:50 you state that words couldn't appear spontaneously however most kids have at some point seen a word that formed within their alphabet spaghetti without direct intervention. within this same arch, the "Language" you define for DNA is a set of codes we as humans have assigned them based on the chemical compositions that are contained. 05:00 timescales are important, current estimates put the theory of abiogenesis at approximately 4 - 4.3 Billion years ago, a few million years as quoted, is the typical estimation for most noticeable divergences of speciation, you may think of this as the time for a new species of dog to have emerged naturally (not selectively bred for). 05:20 All life is at it's most basic parts simply a series of repeating chemical reactions, this "life from matter" speech is a little misconstrued in this context. 05:30 there are many different religious people from different faith backgrounds within the scientific community. 06:00 we've not seen new matter naturally come into existence because of those previously noted timescales. the planet is approx 4.6 Billion years old, early chemical reactions started within the first 500 million - 1 billion years by which point most chemical reactions have built chains of order, one feeding on the byproduct of another and in some cases combining as a result, the current understanding of science (broadly used) has been around only a few thousand years. Our observable conditions are drastically different from when they first emerged. throughout human history however we have synthetized many new constructs including basically all known medicine. 06:30 one book is not indicative of all knowledge, this is as much the truth for science as it is religion. 07:30 Quite underhanded to assume that the moment someone stops to think over the best way to answer a question is indicative of not having an answer, nor would giving an answer without the correct context make any greater sense. 08:40 you asked about intelligent design, he responded with an answer around intelligent design, one of many theories that surround the origin of life and in this case is on a par scale of a biblical creation, the idea that something we can't prove or disprove created everything we know. please see also the simulation hypothesis or Abiogenesis for some other alternatives. 09:30 continuation of the above point. He answered a question with one theory, interestingly a similar (if somewhat simplified) process of this is often in use today, selectively breading particular species for a desired result. we call it animal husbandry and is used to create cows with a higher milk yield for example. 10:00 again misconstrued and simplified that you would assume this is a cyclic event, it is a singular theory not one supported by all scientists, indeed the general view is to not assume Aliens for anything until all other more rational ideas are exhausted. 10:45 The bible is known to have been written and rewritten multiple times over and over to appeal to modern cultures and thinking, true of all beliefs (in this context science is included), however the term blind faith is indicative of one without evidence. your evidence is that you can see complex things but don't understand how they came to be a process that science tries to answer rather than accept. 10:50 "... and it does, over and over again." (confirm the existence of god), could you please give some examples of this confirmation? 11:15 If we all come from just one descendant, then surely our entire gene pool should be littered with the effects known from inbreeding. 11:50 just to confirm, but did you just akin the fossil records to the great flood? even though their time range as understood from carbon dating (among other processes) differs massively from those in the bible. 12:18 "I believe..." (in the context of flood water), arguably the biggest factor in the whole debate, science can give you a reason for how and why those different layers exist but what knowledgebase do you have to support your belief? 15:15 You acknowledge that the process typically takes much longer periods of time and that the layers observed have a variable makeup, i implore you to look up geo sampling techniques to further your understanding on the topic but in short there ways in which rapid changes in atmosphere (specifically in local regions) such as this eruption, are logged. this acknowledges that such extreme changes can occur but in for example the grand canyon, rock samples at different depths will result the variable changes over many many years. 15:55 you are even using biblical articles to uphold your argument, attempting to highlight them as real news, as before, i implore you to review more than a single source of information before making such claims. 17:50 while we are on the topic of "the great flood", could you please explain to me where all this water came from and where it went after, with all the previous articles you've mentioned large bodies of water rapidly shaping the landscape and used a real world example to try to uphold this ideal, but in the real world examples, geological events impacted current bodies of water in isolated environments not globally and without a starting event. 18:00 the process of fossilization takes a long time (normally), the death of the object being fossilized may have come rather swiftly. once immobile, that fossilization process could take as long as is needed, dead things rarely move. 18:40 this accounts for the laboratory conditions, many of the bacteria and other processes that would be natures way of acting this process are removed (as much as possible) to test specific reactions as desired by an experiment. this is generally a standard practice in labs to understand specifics rather than try to identify which process did what. 22:50 Ice ages (glaciation events) have occurred many time in our history and can be found in rock samples around the world as well as in the polar regions themselves. the preceding video to this was littered with factual inadequacies and missing information, again, please look up some information on these events and their supporting evidence. 23:00 "This explains the world" I'm not following... nothing you have said or shown has helped to interpret any of the multitude of events that lead us to where we are nor do they take into account a great deal of our history 24:00 basically what i just said above, you choose to ignore a great deal of the known history of earth. 26:00 You seem to hinge the argument here on the age of the earth being around 6,000 years old, even though you admit things like dinosaurs and thorns and even cavemen came before this period. 26:30 "One creation scientist i know..." again, singular sample sizes are not the most reliable, that is often considered one of the corner stones of science. Typically, if it is not replicable, it's refutable. 27:25 "one infallible dating method..." again my last point, singular sample sizes are not reliable. 27:45 absolute morality... this is a wonderful topic that really deserves more of your time. Right and Wrong are not fixed concepts, if they were our legal system would have no need for change, topics such as war and slavery which were often considered to be in the name of religion and progress would still be in place today as an absolute word, however we know this is not the right way. acknowledging change, difference and understanding, developing culture over time (one might say culturally evolving) is what has moved us from a tribal species into a global one. A good example of this is the indigenous people of North sentinel island, they have had very little interaction with the outside world and ate the last missionary that tried to tell them they were wrong. Thank you for anyone who reads this.

[@rayzorback88]

Astounding ignorance on display

[@user-rl1fc2wv3o]

​@@rayzorback88 Please expand, if you are referring to the video please give your reasons why you assume ignorance if you are referring to my comments, please also give you views and reasons for why my understandings on the matter are any less valid true ignorance is one who comments without reason or explanation, but reasons and explanations are both attempted by my comments and the video.

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@user-rl1fc2wv3o As for the "GREAT FLOOD." There are Great "Fossil Beds" ALL OVER the Globe, like those in Alberta, Canada, and, various Sites all over N.America. NOTE; In Most cases, we see a most interesting Condition. We find Animals that were Obviously, and Unceremoniously HURLED against Hillsides, and Mud enbankments, as if some ENOR MOUS FORCE came upon then rather suddenly! AND; Almost every Fossil is found in an extreme, Contorted position. In Fact-----Many of these animals were in the process of conduct ing their daily "Business," such as; Eating, or killing their Prey. Or, Copilating.....Even, giving Birth, When the Cataclysm struck! To Add to that; Anthropologists have discovered Hundreds and Hundreds of Huge Shells, and, Shell fish up in High Mountainous Regions. In Fact----They have found Numerous, and Complete WHALE Skeletons, on the those High Mountain areas. No matter WHAT your "Worldview" is-----These things are UNDENIABLE, to say the Least!

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@user-rl1fc2wv3o As for your words; "One Creation Scientist I know...." Did you know----There are Several evolution Scientists that, over the years, ADMITTED.....The "Fossil Record does not Supply us with the Convincing in--between stages of evolution that we should See..." It wasn't Just Darwin who honestly admitted this. Stephen J. Gould, in one of his books; "It's a Wonderful life," Admitted this. AND; Eugenie Clark admitted the truth about the Lack of evidence in the fossil record. Only SHE was foolish enough to assert...."It Doesn't Matter!" OH REALLY!?? I Challenge you to DISPROVE that which has been discovered in the Science of BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY. More and More evidence is being brought forth that provides the Compelling accuracy of Scripture.

[@BlueLake7]

I assume you haven’t given much thought to your answer, nor could you wrap your mind around what was said in the video. I suggest you do more research on your own with an open mind. Your rhetoric indicates a mind set on continuing with the failed Darwinian course of thinking. One of your greatest points of pure ignorance is the statement about the Bible having been written over and over. However, it has not been changed from the first known existence of God’s word. So, I believe you have it confused with the Quran, which has been changed and several different examples exist today. I stopped reading your monologue after that false Bible statement. I know it’s hard for a brain washed mind to grasp the important truths of this video. So read the Bible, study it daily, and continue to do your research. Maybe you will be able to grasp the truth eventually. God said in his word, seek and you shall find. But, you have to want to find the truth regardless of where it leads. If you refuse to consider that your enemy could possibly be right you can never, just as Dawkins, come to the full knowledge of the truth.

[@rajvirdee1317]

He started something and every one fell for it.

[@t-bonewtf]

It is a ridiculous video.

[@betsieswartz]

Yeah the people writing the Bible did that

[@dawnemile7499]

Almost everyone. Some had to agree because they were forced by academia.

[@dawnemile7499]

​@@betsieswartzBoth the Bible and Darwin's theory are impossible. Only thing is Darwin's theory is more impossible to believe.

[@t-bonewtf]

@@dawnemile7499 I disagree. Evolution and natural selection have been proven by scholars and accepted as true and taught in academia for many decades. Only fanatical and uneducated people disprove of it. What IS ridiculous is the idea that an omnipotent sky God can resolve your problems. THAT has never been shown to be true.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Thanks AIG 🙏🕊️✝️

[@betsieswartz]

Thanks for misinformation?

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@betsieswartz No----Thanks for Cuttin' it Straight!

[@betsieswartz]

@@raygsbrelcik5578 they do the exact opposite though

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@betsieswartz No-----They do NOT!

[@betsieswartz]

@@raygsbrelcik5578 they do

[@psyience3213]

That’s just a reworked watch maker argument which is a pretty poor, fallacious argument

[@gonindunit]

Terrific!

[@sholland42]

As a Christian I feel it necessary to point out the idiocy of Dawkins’ conclusion of where life originated, more of the same, trillions of years this time. I laughed almost as hard as when I watched that “documentary” on Netflix about “infinity”.

[@globalcoupledances]

I dont' belive Dawkins said trillions of years, it is just 4 billion years

[@user-rl1fc2wv3o]

Approx 4.6 Billion years is the age of our planet as understood by uranium dating mechanisms (a process more precise than carbon dating for greater age dates) but even carbon dating is relatively accurate for up to 5-6 thousand years which would put much question on many of the topics noted in this video. remember also that Dawkins is only one voice in a community and so it's not an accurate representation of known science. as i mentioned in my own comments, a singular sample hardly compelling, if it isn't repeatable it is refutable.

[@rodrogers6895]

AronRa’s KZbin channel has 8 videos that disprove the Flood story.

[@nathanwhite704]

Nice recommendation, I enjoyed that series. I missed out watching it when he first posted it as I was deeply indoctrinated into charismatic Christianity and avoided him like the plague but now that I’ve gone through several deconstructions I watch everything he posts same goes for gutsick gibbon.

[@barryblackwood6050]

Can you give the basic reason behind Ra's rebuttal idea? Cheers

[@L-8]

@@barryblackwood6050 It didn’t happen, and there is evidence against it - I guess that’s the idea… In fact saying there is evidence against it is an understatement. Any knowledge of world history paired with common sense very quickly reveals the absurd impossibility.

[@barryblackwood6050]

@@L-8 Have you seen Mount St Helen's footage? That shut my mouth & opened my eyes.

[@nathanwhite704]

@@barryblackwood6050are you saying that opened your eyes to the fact genesis is myth? Or that it opened your eyes that it’s not? Either way how does that work? It doesn’t make sense.

[@YNWA188..]

Amazing absolutely amazing we are ghods creation Ghod bless 🍀🎄🍀🎄🍀🙏🙏🙏

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

02:00 that's actually amazing

[@orientof]

Amen

[@dooglitas]

Amen to your amen.

[@larrycarter3765]

What 'view' is that?

[@marlenachetwynd2925]

Ty Ken Ham, the team is on fire for the Lord

[@gamEnjoyLP]

The amount of times there are assumptions which go on as a basis to your supposed Truth is astonishing.

[@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475]

Well done, very informative and accurate.

[@leroyjenkins3744]

Maybe if it’s Opposite Day ig

[@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475]

@@leroyjenkins3744 please enlighten us with your intellect.

[@leroyjenkins3744]

@@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475who said anything about my intelligence? I’m just saying the information within the video is neither informative nor accurate.

[@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475]

@@leroyjenkins3744 then you can enlighten us with your proof and intellect of this subject. If you disagree merely because you were taught differently or you heard it a different way ok share, or don’t blindly object without knowledge why but you just cannot accept the premise of the information. So with waited breath explain how it is wrong don’t just merely say oh this is wrong bring proof or merely say it’s against your feelings. Scientifically, none of the information provided here can be disputed by any proof. So, this video makes a clear statement and you can can I don’t believe it because it hurts my feelings or what someone else said or taught but you cannot not say this information is wrong based on knowledge or science.

[@leroyjenkins3744]

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475look man I didn’t want to write a wall of text, but since you want it so badly then here you go. I have degrees in biology and biochemistry. I know the inter-workings of DNA pretty well seeing as how it’s my field of study. DNA is described as a language by Ken here. This is not entirely accurate or true. The genetic code can be thought of as a language that we read but that is only we have assigned language-like aspects to it. This is because DNA “language” is physical properties of DNA not a language that conveys abstract information. That’s like calling the color of a car in a lineup at a dealership a language. The letters associated with DNA provide different shapes and binding opportunities for enzymes to conform to. Think of it like a boulder falling down a hill and landing in a hole big enough for the boulder. You wouldn’t say that the rock knew it would land in that spot nor that the spot was a language for the rock or that the spot was made for said rock. It just happens to fit. This is similar to how enzymes interact with DNA. Of course now, over the course of millions of years enzymes have been selected for the ability to better bind to DNA. That was done by little mistakes in the process of crating proteins. That’s what we call mutations. Mutations can be deleterious, advantageous, or silent and in this case they are advantageous. It’s not a language. Also the clip of Richard Dawkins is taken out of context and cut in a way to make him look bad. Ken does nothing but pure uneducated propaganda on this channel. He makes fallacy after fallacy and keeps on going. It is not informative nor accurate information.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

07:25 crickets 😅

[@charlesarbuckle7958]

brilliant!

[@betsieswartz]

I can’t find the brilliance. Oh, that’s because it’s not here.

[@KGrace0001]

I enjoy looking at these comments. It really shows how people can think differently and not understand what others can understand so well. Listen... It takes more than just the Bible to understand God. It takes a Church, a strong spiritual community, and most importantly a priest that stands with the very first traditions of Christ and Holiness. I come from a Catholic background, but didn't understand God much at all, however I am learning more and more about it all as I am now aspiring into Greek Eastern Christian Orthodoxy. It takes more than words for someone to understand. It takes time, patience, and courage. For the atheist, believe what you want, just don't call us foolish for wanting to believe that we were meant to have a purpose. For Christians, stay strong. Our Lord will come serve our hearts justice at the time of the Second Resurrection, whenever that time may be. Follow Christ with all your heart, do not be afraid of the fallen world of which has tainted our hearts with fear, anger, and hatred. And most importantly, pray for the ones who have gone against us. Lord have mercy.

[@hongotedesco8931]

See, when you say "for the atheist, believe what you want", is missing the point. The point is that atheists don't really believe anything. They find the evidence for any kind of god completely wanting. So it leaves us with a lot of unanswered questions.

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@nathancook2852Yeh well----the Catholic religion is a False Religion! True Christians NEVER committed the atrocities that the RCC committed! And Almighty GOD will GIVE understanding to anyone who Comes humbly before HIM. You do not know the Bible, or its Power-----Therefore, you are not qualified to speak against It. Respectfully.

[@Florida79578]

Evidence and facts beat blind brainwashed faith

[@theriveroffaith852]

Even with DNA you still might not have life. Life is not a thing of chance, but a gift from somewhere out of the world we are familiar with, because of the Love of the gift Giver.

[@rstevewarmorycom]

Pure garbage. The educated KNOW how genetic chemistry works!! YOU DO NOT!!

[@scooterliberty4217]

Life is a gift from God. He created all life

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@scooterliberty4217 That would include parasites and malaria mosquitoes? Why would your laughable god do that?

[@nyxculp9290]

​@JB-yb4wn Read the first 3 chapters of Genesis and you will find your answer. Then keep reading.🙂

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@nyxculp9290 Well let's see. Oh I see that the Earth was created before the universe, well that's a lie. Night and day was created before the sun, well that's a lie. There is supposed to be a dome separating the waters, well that's a lie. Plants were created before anything else, well that's a lie. Stars were created after the Earth, well that's a lie. The moon is a night light, the moon reflects the sun's rays, so that's a lie. So you want me to learn how to lie like a theist?

[@alarictheredboi276yearsago4]

It’s truly a shame to see so many shackled by myth.

[@TheSaintFrenzy]

Indeed, may we be free from Darwinian theory once and for all.

[@stephenking4170]

Yes. especially the myths of abiogenesis and atheism.

[@stevemcclendon9297]

The petrification process is done by removing the organic matter while preserving the and hardening the cell casing, this was done chemically to speed up the process but naturally it would take a while.

[@Studbull]

What is your view on Dr. Sarah Hill and her book on evolution?

[@janehelbert7551]

We loved the Creation Museum!

[@Censoredbyyourcult]

You loved being lied and propagandized to?

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@Censoredbyyourcult They were commenting on the large windows the museum has for licking, also they have better tasting red crayons apparently.

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@Censoredbyyourcult NO, actually, that would be You, dear Friend!

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@JB-yb4wn Your 5th--grade comment exposes how LITTLE you Know of the Subject, my undereducated friend!

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@raygsbrelcik5578 Try me, I know this stuff better than you. Tell me how the Egyptians missed the flood memo. Tell me who in Noah's crew had DNA markers for Inuit, Australian aborigine, or even Tolmec traits. Waiting for your inane answer.

[@derrickburry1788]

Thank you for telling the truth

[@razark9]

Creationists and specially their propaganda mills are incapable of doing that.

[@JB-yb4wn]

Well, Derrick, what Ken was telling you is that he is clueless when it comes to matters scientific. If you bothered to google any of his laughable arguments, you will find out what a big fool he really is.

[@derrickburry1788]

@@JB-yb4wn I take it you don't believe in God and his creation of the world. Therefore, you are the fool.

[@mattwhite7287]

Truth is quite subjective, isn't it? 😅

[@derrickburry1788]

@@mattwhite7287 There's only one truth. It's found in the Bible. Read it and you'll know what I mean.

[@benyaeger4388]

Public education has become a scary place to send your children. Its so sad some parents don't have the possibility to do otherwise.

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

We rely on dating methods every time you put fuel in your car. How do you think they work out where to drill?

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

@Who_IsLike_God exactly. And we use that value reliably time and again to make predictions such as where to find oil, fossils etc. One of the scientific tests of a theory is its ability to make verifiable novel predictions.

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

@Who_IsLike_God it's not scientists that won't change. Theories such as evolution and the big bang were very controversial and met with a lot of resistance. Eventually the weight of evidence shifts people's opinions. It's creationists who start with the answer and try to make the facts fit. There is a massive amount of evidence for evolution. So much bigger than the fossil record. Finding anomalies is what science deals with all the time. Theories are constantly revised. But the basic premise of random mutation plus natural selection has proved bullet proof for a long time

[@gweilospur5877]

You could destroy every scientific theory that exists and that would still say nothing about the existence of any gods.

[@kiwisaram9373]

You are right for men have always believed in God or gods in all places and at all times, so saying there is no evidence for gods is like saying they believed such things for no reason and that would be wrong for the default would be to believe nothing if there were not good reason to do otherwise.

[@gweilospur5877]

@@kiwisaram9373 People also believe in ghosts, alien abductions and Santa Claus.

[@stephenolan5539]

​@@kiwisaram9373 No they had reasons. Reasons having nothing to do the existence of God. If they believed because God is real, then why so many wrong beliefs?

[@toldyouso5588]

Name your top 5 anti-God scientist and lets compare them with my top 5 Christian scientists.

[@gweilospur5877]

@@toldyouso5588 Most famous scientists identified as Christians because in their day they had no choice. Do you think people in Newton’s time had the option to be atheist? The closer you get to more modern and enlightened times the less likely scientists are to be religious.

[@avgejoeschmoe2027]

The scientific understanding of genomics has greatly expanded in the last 10 years and destroys the theory of evolution Holding to the myth of evolution is now embarrassing Teaching evolution in our schools and Universities is like still teaching a Flat Earth

[@Donald_Trump_2024]

its like saying the sky is blue because of water vapor. it might be partially true but the overwhelming majority is not for that reason

[@markduell2468]

The fossil record clearly contradicts creationism.

[@markduell2468]

@@Donald_Trump_2024 Does Donald Trump represent a Godly person?

[@CaptainFantastic222]

That seems like an insane claim to me because in my opinion DNA sequencing is the best evidence for evolution. Perhaps you could provide more detail?

[@theknighttemplar8177]

​@@markduell2468how so? 🤔

[@miscamisca6775]

Perfect, now AiG finally agree with geologist since 150 years that the layers around upright fossils does not take millions of years to create

[@jounisuninen]

The Flood logically explains fossils and geological formations. While all carcasses are eaten away within days, this means that the evolutionist story of dead animals getting slowly buried under earth layers during millions of years must be nonsense. All fossils have come about as the consequence of a great geological catastrophe (the Flood) which buried animals suddenly when they were still alive.

[@lizd2943]

A single flood event would jumble them all together, not sort them by faunal succession which is how they're sorted. It would also not create distinct layers that require different environmental conditions to form. What it would do is wipe out all life on Earth forever just from the heat, and there are a multitude of other reasons the Ark story doesn't work. @@jounisuninen

[@georgewagner7787]

​@@nathancook2852 they took enough food for the first year after the food? And baby elephants

[@enockmarere3113]

well explained

[@betsieswartz]

I’m trying to find the good explanation but I can’t. Can you point it out for me?

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Amen AIG. DNA has encoded information in it. Random chance and mutations cannot produce that. Its a silly thing to think creation came about without the hand of God. 🙂🙏✝️

[@richardgregory3684]

Good job evolution includes natural selection then, so it's not "random chance".

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

​@@richardgregory3684 natural selection or microevolution is not something creationists disagree with. It is a far cry from saying one species over millions of years became another one.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@christtheonlyhope4578 Then you must agree that it is not "random chance". "Microevolution" and "macroevolution" are creationist inventions. Unable to deny that living things do indeed change through successive generations, they yet seek to deny speciation. In reality, there is only evolution,and small changes through many generations leads to large change, including new species. I suspect you next excuse will be something about "kinds", whatever those are supposed to be.

[@Yipper64]

@@richardgregory3684 as the other guy said, microevolution isnt something creationists disagree with, that part is obviously observable. Every time a virus mutates, the massive variety of dog breeds, all that type of thing. But here's the thing, natural selection still requires the base DNA for it to mutate and change, so it doesnt prove where it came from the in the first place, that's the point.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@Yipper64 "Micro" and "macro" evolution are just creationist inventions, the more sane among them cannot deny the obvous, but they still want to cling to the bible, so they accept bacteria change but refuse to accept that existing species can produce new ones. Evolution has never sought to explain the origin of life. That is just the god of the gaps argument. Science doesn;lt know with any great certainty how life got started, although there are some good hypotheses. The origin of life is almost certainly chemistry, starting with relatively simple self-replicating molecules. The moment you get those (and yes, we pobserve those forming naturally), evolution through natural selection kicks in. The very earliest "life" was probably not even DNA based, but more likely, RNA.

[@Perktube1]

I remember in Expelled that Richard Dawkins said that the moment he stopped believing in God and heaven amd hell, a wave of relief swept over him. I think he remains a staunch atheist because he wants to keep that relief.

[@dooglitas]

I believe you are right.

[@LV4EVR]

And that "relief" will turn to eternal torment upon his death. And at 82, he's closer to meeting God face to face than ever. All we can do is pray that he (and all who deny God) will repent and trusts in Jesus for forgiveness ... before it is too late.

[@johnnyxmusic]

@@LV4EVR why would you choose to believe in a god hood, subject, imperfect human beings… Creatures, who arose after billions of years to become aware and conscious… To eternal suffering? I kind of like the idea that God made a mistake with angels by giving them eternal life because now you have devils demons and everything that I have to be separated from Goddard chained up, or have to hang out in their special place… So he made man to be no different than the animals and the grass of the field… I have the breath of life… Which also means that they can die… And then return the life is a gift of God… And if you don’t get it… You’re just burnt up in the fire like tares, or like tears in rain

[@LV4EVR]

@@johnnyxmusic I believe in the Creator because there is a creation. I have studied the theory of evolution for decades, and have found it to be intellectually bankrupt and wholly incapable of explaining how life began and ANY of its complexity-vision, reproduction, perception, healing, thought, creativity, etc. You can choose to believe that nothing created everything, but that is beyond illogical, it is statistically impossible. Your words indicate confusion, and you don't understand and/or believe what the Bible plainly teaches. That's exactly what happens to all who reject God; He hides things from them and, ultimately will give them a 'reprobate' or 'depraved' mind. (Read Romans 1, it explains this perfectly.) Like me and everyone else, you have sinned against the very God who gave you life. You probably enjoy sin, as most of us do. However, sin separates you from God now, and if you die unforgiven, forever. Yes, eternal suffering. You will not be burnt up in the fire; you will exist forever, somewhere. Yet God sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to pay the penalty we're not able to. He offers you a choice of eternal life with Him, and the absence of everything bad; or, eternal existence without Him and the absence of anything good. Johnny, don't reject the offer of the Creator. He made you for a purpose, He knows everything about you, including all of your 'secret' sins, and loves you still. He didn't make you a robot; He allows you to chose or reject Him. It is your choice that determines your eternity. Praying that you will confess your sins to God, acknowledge that Jesus is God's Son-God in human flesh-that He died in your place, and ask Him to forgive you and give you eternal life today. Blessings and love.

[@nurse580]

The pagan teaching of ‘hell’ that many churches teach is an insult to the character and person of God Generally speaking no imperfect human would ever deliberately torture another person endlessly yet these ‘christians’ claim that GOD does this?? This means that God is i INFERIOR in character to imperfect sinful human beings who would never do such a thing How could that ever be true ? This disgusting teaching is a perfect example of how Satan the devil has very successfully deceived the ‘christian’ church No wonder they are partly responsible for the athiests of the world

[@rwj1276]

KZbin is becoming a pain to watch with all the ads. Are ther alternative platforms to watch your videos on?

[@benyaeger4388]

Creation is making more sense everyday I live this life and honesty seek answers.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

Great explanation, observable science verifies scripture and debunks darwinism.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

@@Moist._Robot yep

[@kevinrtres]

Noist-Robot seemingly doesn't understand simple chemistry which is why s/he/it truly believes that no intelligence is required to form DNA. Perhaps Moist-Robot would like to demonstrate how that happens - after all it requires no intelligence therefore it should be a simple thing for an intelligent mind to organize such a demo.

[@soonertee]

​@Moist._Robot then you have no problem providing the proof of your research here. I'm excited to see it.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

@@soonertee he can't, everybody here knows it. Sad thing about robots is they only follow what they're programmed to do. Fortunately he only pretends to be a robot. So exposure to the truth can still open his eyes.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

@@Moist._Robot it's never been debunked because it is impossible to disprove factual information.

[@Kane.Griffin]

Everyone needs to read the last chapter in his famous book. You'll see even he didn't believe what he was writing on the origin of species.

[@nathanwhite704]

Liar.

[@burntgod7165]

You're a liar.

[@eriolduterion8855]

Having read Origin of Species by Darwin, as well as Life, Its Nature Origin and Development by Oparin, I can tell you that a) Darwin did indeed find the basis for species, and that b) Oparin's work did indeed confirm it. (You know, that inconvenient scientific standard.)

[@betsieswartz]

🧢

[@jeffreyrobinson3555]

I’m not Christian, I believe the only way we get the universe and get life requires an extra universal intelligence Why did this intelligence create the universe and life? I don’t know, I can’t provide you with anything more than an opinion. However I do know that a creator started it all. I think that when we talk about the proof of God we need do so outside of religious outlook. This isn’t criticism . I enjoyed this presentation very much

[@JB-yb4wn]

Well how do you know a creator started it all? You read anything on astrophysics, is that too hard?

[@jeffreyrobinson3555]

@@JB-yb4wn I read a lot of it, not too hard at all You seem to have read it. So explain cosmic inflation to me. Any math that makes that possible, any hypothesis that explains it? We can say the earth is perfect for life, but of course if we evolved here we would fit our planet perfectly. But think of the series of steps to make it so We have to have a massive moon to stabilize our revolutions. We have to have a large iron core to set up a magnetic field with a sun that’s stable enough not to be burning through it all the time. We have to have a Jupiter to protect the inner solos system, and we need a Saturn to keep Jupiter from becoming a hot Jupiter We also couldn’t get much closer to the inner galaxy or we would be cooked. In the last two to three billion years we couldn’t be too close to a hot star We are a Goldilocks planet, around a Goldilocks star, in a Goldilocks system, in a Goldilocks galactic orbit with out big ugly bears close to-us now or too close since at least the Cambrian explosion. And that not even accounting for the remarkable string of ‘random events’ that all had to go our way before our six time Goldilocks planet came in to existance It does no good to evolve to fit your planet if your going to be burned by an unstable sun, swallowed by a hot Jupiter, burned by close by super novas, or not given stable enough rotation to provide the time to evolve. Draw a random card from a deck. There is a one in fifty two chance of drawing the ace of spades, but you randomly draw all four aces then all four kings then all four queens it becomes hard to call it random.

[@georgewagner7787]

​@@jeffreyrobinson3555 al of this does give evidence of a creator. We can only know who he is through self revelation. It then becomes worship or what you call religion. Not separate from facts

[@jeffreyrobinson3555]

@@georgewagner7787 I’m not Christian, but I have religion. However religion is subjective. Do you know Christ, did you take him in to your heart? Can you prove it? Well of course we can’t, faith is beyond proof. A watch suggest a watch maker. This is an old argument, but in of it self the only thing that a watch suggest is a skilled maker, but was that maker an honest man? Did he cheat on his wife, abuse his children, give to charity, sucker the needy? I met the maker, I believe he is good, but he lives far away and has no phone, I can only give testimony to my personal knowledge of the maker and that proves nothing. The same with the creator. Throughout the years people have offered testimony to that creator, but he reveals himself to us one at a time All I can prove is the only way we get this universe is via a universe maker. The only way we get life is via a life maker Atheist will ask who created God then? That’s a null question. We can’t answer that in a logical way, and that says nothing about creation. That’s only can be understood through a personal relationship with the creator, and that’s subjective. If you have a bruise it means something bruised you. But only you knew if it hurt or how bad it hurt, but something bruised you.

[@raygsbrelcik5578]

​@@JB-yb4wnAND----There is NO WAY any type of "Dating" method can be Imperically Proclaimed as GOSPEL! Nobody but Nobody Was THERE to record the Conditions. Actually, we have observed things happening very QUICKLY in our World! Did you not KNOW----It doesn't take Thousands, much less, MILLIONS of years to form a fossil? YES----It only takes a few MONTHS!! All that is needed is RAPID COMPRESSION, and the drying of the Sediment before the animal completely de composes. THINK about it; If a carcass sits out in the Open for too long, the combination of predators, weather conditions, and the Shifting of the landscape, will totally destroy both the Flesh AND bones of even a large mammal. I used to live near a farm, as a kid, and we found the dead body of a Cow, that must've been there for quite a number of years, because, when we touched those bones....they simply shattered into dusty fragments. Well, you can't Tell me that cow was just Sitting out there for Thousands of years! My POINT, therefore, is-----Something HUGE occurred, that caused millions of animals to die QUICKLY, and during the very Same Cataclysmic Event!

[@alexburge1560]

Thanks

[@Quint-ib4nf]

My world view has not been destroyed.

[@betsieswartz]

True

[@philhart4849]

I must admit to having laughed at Ken Ham's absurdity.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

An atheist is a person who doesn't think any gods exist. Not really something that can be 'destroyed'.

[@nathanwhite704]

Well technically it could but that would require undeniable evidence that a god exists but there is none.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@nathanwhite704 yeah, true

[@nathanwhite704]

@@Who_IsLike_God Nonsense.

[@nathanwhite704]

@@Who_IsLike_God What does that even mean? Our senses are reliable because thats all we really have to go by, there's no evidence for God. No evidence for fine tuning or irreducible complexity or any of your other 100+ year old arguments.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

​@@Who_IsLike_God What do senses being reliable have to do with there being a god?

[@saliadee2564]

Magnificent

[@judithspears9356]

AMEN..❤

[@user-hr8dx9qw4n]

As a Deist : The bible is a man made book with man made wisdom (Kain and Abel) and man made fallacies : + light wasn't there before the sun + the earth wasn't there before the sun + Adam and Eve didn't exist + insects have six legs not four legs + the value of Pi isn't 3 + homosexuality is not a seduction by a satan, but a natural born healthy sexual orientation + the "firmament" is not a solid "roof" over the world + the moon doesn't produce visible light + etc etc If the bible would be from god it would be without fallacies, but it isn't.

[@davidmaust1415]

Someone should sometime see if there is fossils found in Mt st Helen's mud flows to debunk wrong views of how long it takes to make a fossil

[@stevepierce6467]

So, you do believe in science! That is what science does, goes looking for evidence of whether our present hypothesis is right or wrong.

[@JB-yb4wn]

And David, if the science says that you are wrong, and really does take a long time to make a fossil, you still going to believe in your 2000 year old fairy tales? Of course you will, better to remain ignorant than having to accept that your dogma is seriously flawed.

[@betsieswartz]

Yeah except there’s no fossils at Mt. Saint Helens. It’s impossible, so good luck on your fruitless journey.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@betsieswartz With any luck, he will be there when thing blows again.

[@georgewagner7787]

There aren't fossils there because everyone and everything ran except one old guy in a cabin.

[@JustinAnthonySantos]

You should also bring up the original Calendar God created. New Year's starts somewhere in March-April (Nisan/Aviv). We are living using the Gregorian Calendar, which differs from the original one. On the Gregorian calendar, I was born on the 9th month of September; on the Hebrew Calendar, I was born on the 6th month of Elul. If you haven't questioned our modern calendar, why would the New Year start in winter?

[@RyanHamley-cl6en]

Bravo

[@kenbattor6350]

As an Atheist, I never knew I had an 'Atheistic Worldview'. I always figured Atheism was just a lack of belief in any god.

[@Jack__________]

The very fact that anything exists at all is more evidence of a creator than the lack of one. When someone tells me to prove there’s a God, I say, “just look around.” And there is no way to prove that there is no God. The further you look up or down, the more dangerous you will find it to be. We only have this thin slice of all of existence in which we can survive… and I no longer believe that all of this could come just from trillions upon trillions upon trillions of random accidents. (Look up: Levinthal’s Paradox.)

[@JoeBuck-uc3bl]

Lol it’s impossible not to have a philosophical worldview. Just because you never fleshed it out, doesn’t mean that you don’t have one. Although atheism would only be part of someone’s worldview.

[@kenbattor6350]

@@JoeBuck-uc3bl Whether I believe in a god or not, I'm still going to act the same.

[@elmercoblentz9432]

Such effort to retain the rights to believe in a place that is wrong in every sense, makes nothing right, no justice or justification, just vengeance. The dirtiest, most disgusting thing we were ever asked to believe. Now in order to witness, give testimony for our faith, is to find and condemn those worthy of spending an eternity in torment. We can’t honestly think of one person that really deserves that, so we pretend to trust God will do that. Makes our life complete and beautiful. Sickening what religion forces us to pretend. Just for the honor of peers.

[@RitmosMC]

True

[@betsieswartz]

This man is a walking W

[@PortmanRd]

Here we go again. 😦

[@micknamens8659]

2:36 What came first: hen or egg? Information or language? Cars or steets?

[@user-uw4bl6ru8v]

Thank you answers in genesis for making me an Atheist.

[@williamwhite1596]

To be separate from God is to be truly without wisdom no matter how intelligent a person is . John 14:9 KJV Bible !!!

[@markduell2468]

That same Bible condones slavery. Are you OK with that?

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

Amen

[@rogercaldwell2440]

I love it 🙏

[@squeaksohko5863]

I'm confused, what does John 14;9 have to do with the comment or the video? Not trying to offend you, I just don't know if you made a mistake of which verse you wanted to quote.

[@williamwhite1596]

@@squeaksohko5863 No mistake He is where every answer can be found every Blessing . The man is lost in a never ending question .

[@nicholasloftus7421]

The Christian world view got high jacked because the formation of earth and evolution is not religious 😅😅😅👌💯

[@jnorth1000]

It doesn't help his argument to have a mouth-breather sitting in the front row.

[@SK-bw2cv]

Good job exposing the mythology of evolution. There is more facts in Mother Hubbard than the theory of evolution. 😂 Love you AIG

[@michaelawford7325]

Rubbish

[@toldyouso5588]

...more imporantly Mother Hubbard could produce a real bone for the dog. While Darwin's missing link is still missing.

[@nathanwhite704]

@@toldyouso5588 Define Darwins "Missing Link"?

[@nathanwhite704]

@@toldyouso5588 Your missing link argument is over 100 years old btw. It proves you have no idea what evolution is or how it works. Evolution isn't like a ladder and we did not come from Chimps.

[@toldyouso5588]

@@nathanwhite704 Thank you for at least admitting that it is missing.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

I love the thumbnail! 'Charles didn't think of this' This obsession with Charles Darwin the young Earth creationists have is baffling. Nobody talks about Charles Darwin more than young Earth creationists, it's so weird

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@Who_IsLike_God it's actually fantastic entertainment! It's also sad, because they put out so many videos that are so obviously anti-science, yet they love to talk about science all the time as if they are actually interested. Channels like this need to be mocked. We need more science literacy in the world, not more ignorance. So, yes, I pop in and out of these videos a lot leaving comments. I do it with other channels as well. No big deal, right? It's true though:-) young Earth creationists seem to be obsessed with Charles, as if evolutionary theory is based on him alone, one person, and he is some sort of Messianic figure or something. It's a clear-cut, excellent example of projection. Look how many videos they have on their Channel talking about Charles Darwin and biological evolution, and all they do is misrepresent and lie about the subject. That should raise some huge red flags in your head, but unfortunately, I know it doesn't.

[@ShamoaKrasieski-xm4ze]

This is real education. Everyone should watch this.

[@Sundayschoolnetwork]

You know what else never happens? Nothing has never created something.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

Where did your god come from?

[@Sundayschoolnetwork]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... he's outside of creation. He is eternal.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@@Sundayschoolnetwork that doesn't explain anything... where did he come from?

[@Sundayschoolnetwork]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... God doesn't come from anywhere. He is.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@@Sundayschoolnetwork so he's nothing? How can he be a he?

[@robertl6631]

Atheism is not a world view. Its simply the non belief in any gods. Period.

[@jeremiahsams2848]

Ok 🤣🤣🤣.

[@IlxEliteJay]

Atheism can indeed be considered a worldview when it forms part of a broader framework of beliefs and perspectives on fundamental questions about existence, morality, meaning, and the nature of reality. While atheism itself is simply the absence of belief in gods, individuals who identify as atheists often have a distinct set of beliefs and values that shape their understanding of the world, making atheism a component of their overall worldview.

[@razark9]

Happy birthday to a real and very important man in human history, Isaac Newton.

[@globalcoupledances]

Indeed, born 25 December

[@jounisuninen]

”Though these bodies may indeed continue in their orbits by the mere laws of gravity, yet they could by no means have at first derived the regular position of the orbits themselves from those laws. Thus, this most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the council and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.” - General Scholium to the Principia (Isaac Newton) In his posthumously-published Observations Upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John, Isaac Newton expressed his belief that Bible prophecy would not be understood "until the time of the end", and that even then "none of the wicked shall understand". This we other creationists understand as well.

[@razark9]

@@jounisuninen I mean... Isaac Newton was indeed very, very religious. So what? Everyone was in his time. His religious beliefs were also irellevant to the discoveries he made. And since then the origin of the solar system and planetary orbits have been thoroughly explained.

[@razark9]

@@jounisuninen I should also remind you that your cult are pretty ''wicked'' yourselves.

[@sscalercourtney5486]

One difference I note between most science based videos and most (not all, most) Bible based science is that scientist tend to say this is our best knowledge which is open to even better knowledge. Where most Bible based science videos say this proves we are absolutely right beyond any question. Interesting. Thus scientist tend to think they could be wrong. While the Bible based science says no possible way we are wrong.

[@CraigBaughan-mg3hf]

Did Adam have DNA? Or was DNA introduced when, after the Great Flood, a different metabolic system was introduced to shorten the lifespan of Noah's descendants?

[@soundrider7025]

good one :)

[@mkjohnson7826]

How could Adam have produced children? Oh, that’s right, men can give birth….I forgot. Oh…wait….he impregnated his wife. I wonder where she came from. Hmmmm the theory of evolution forgot to mention that females randomly formed from ocean sludge over millions of years, too. And , as we all know…two randomly formed creatures just happened to be compatible for creating life. I wonder what the odds are of that happening….? What about the animal kingdom…males and females. Plants….some have male and female characteristics. Bugs….fish….. We might have to give more thought to the “theory”……..

[@onestoptechnologies7305]

No... the Earth had very little Carbon-14 in the environment pre-Flood... After the Flood Carbon-14 levels were drastically increased by water coming up from deep inside the mantle (Ringwoodite). This increase in Carbon-14 levels were picked up by every carbon-based lifeform... specifically plants first... then by herbivores that eat the C-14 laced plants... finally by humans that eat BOTH... C-14 laced plants and C-14 laced animals! Carbon-14 is a tiny nuclear explosion throwing out radiation that rips through DNA sequences damaging their information and causing mutations and cancers... the more radiation... the more damage... the more cancers! This is why the age of humans post-Flood drop off over time(600 years, 450, 250, 200, 175 years) as the C-14 becomes more and more integrated into the biome... It's also why fossils have very low C-14 levels, all of them were pre-Flood...

[@HarvardPartners]

So true!

[@betsieswartz]

Where is the truth again? I can’t seem to find it. Maybe I should go watch a truthful video, and you should too.

[@KGrace0001]

⁠@@betsieswartzGo touch grass...

[@charlesbadrock]

Mythology is very powerful in the human psyche

[@TheSaintFrenzy]

That's why I walked away from evolution a long time ago.

[@charlesbadrock]

@@TheSaintFrenzy Walked away to what?

[@knowone11111]

@@charlesbadrock did you even watch the entirety of the video?

[@charlesbadrock]

@@knowone11111 Yes and?

[@knowone11111]

@@charlesbadrock then you should know that evolution has a lot to demonstrate.

[@bryanteger]

Russell's Teapot.

[@garrygraham7901]

That's just another case of the pot calling the kettle black. Materialist explanations of origin of life and Darwinian evolution are perfect examples of the teapot analogy. Your own mythology has no proof and is unfalsifiable. Yet irrefutable evidence of God exists all around.

[@bryanteger]

@@garrygraham7901 No that's just saying the burden of proof is on you. Not me. You're the one making these claims. I've yet to hear anything that's convinced me otherwise.

[@wittwittwer1043]

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur. Atheists are still around, and they will be as long as religiots are.

[@neorock6135]

"Destroys... " 😂 Yea, sure... There's a very good reason why we are taught about gravity & evolution in science class... They both have mountains of evidence backing them.

[@stephenking4170]

The gravity of ignoring God who created all things, is very deep. It's as logical and respectful as a child rejecting his parents because he wants to be his own boss. I think that in fact very little about gravity is taught in any school classes.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

08:15 he sure seems to go with the "alien intervention" theory. Yet he still admits intelligent design is the only possibility. Dawkins is halfway to being a Christian. Wow. 😉🙏✝️

[@Yipper64]

so I say this as a Christian, but the problem is he *doesnt* admit intelligent design is the only possibility. He says IF (and this is an important if) we find a signature of some kind, it does indeed imply intelligent design, but argues that said intelligent design is not necessarily mean that is God. Which I think is a kind of mute argument, Occam's razor and all that.

[@rstevewarmorycom]

Pure garbage and lies!!

[@OrcaneVault]

⁠​⁠​⁠@@Yipper64 If we were to find some sort of indicator of a designer in our biology, then proposing our designer resides/resided within our universe complies with Occam’s razor. Rather than proposing a God designer which is a type of entity that would introduce an additional concept of a being existing outside of our universe. This would, at present, be an unnecessary addition to our proposed explanation, and Occam’s razor would come into effect.

[@Yipper64]

@@OrcaneVault Well it depends on what set of facts youre working with I suppose. Whatever you consider a given.

[@RitmosMC]

Most quotes in this channel are taken completely out of context or are simply false. And even if Dawkins did convert to Christianity evolution still has mountains of evidence that the guy is this KZbin video completely fails to even make a dent in.

[@deborahhighfill5970]

😮 I think I heard you say, after Adam and Eve sinned,God created thorns and thistles, but after He created man He rested. God cursed the land to make the thorns more abundant and the land needing man to work to produce food.

[@user-ww1kj3ok3z]

The high ejection of the fountains of the great deep into the atmosphere created the ice that fell at the poles. Not volcanoes.

[@njhoepner]

So I decided to give "Answers" in Genesis another chance to make sense. The outcome? 1. 0:34 - 5:06 The same old apologist DNA argument, "it's really complex, therefore god." 2. 5:06 - 8:40 "We don't know how life started, therefore god." God of the gaps again. 3. 9:30: misquotes Dawkins and twists what he obviously said - par for the course for Lies in Genesis. 4. Interlude of "The Bible Tells Me So." 5. 11:35 - 18:00 Standard creationist misuse of Mt St Helens eruption - "it looks like a small canyon, so ALL canyons could only have formed this way." "That mud looks like layers, so ALL layers must have formed this way." Geology by pre-schoolers. 6: Followed by fantasies about a global flood creating things no such event could possibly have created - counting on the ignorance of the audience, which is the same thing as lying. 7. 23:38 Everything ate plants...I'd love to see Lies in Genesis produce evidence for herbivorous lions, herbivorous wolves, herbivorous tyrannosaurs...sure. Like all such claims, evidence level zero. 8. And concludes from 23:56 to the end with "for the bible tells me so." Thus we are supposed to accept that all science MUST be crammed by brute force into a bronze-age myth, because those bronze-age Canaanite priests knew everything. Right. People can of course believe whatever they want. The U.S.A. is still a free country (despite the best efforts of the christians). If you want to restrict your understanding of the universe to what humans knew in the bronze age, be my guest. But that is not what Lies in Genesis wants. They pretend to be doing science in the hope that, if they fool enough people, they can wedge their religion into the public school system and cram it down everyone else's throats by force of law. And THAT is where I draw the line.

[@L-8]

At this point they should really rename the video to: These Comments DESTROY the Creationist Worldview

[@knowone11111]

Diminishing the presentation through mockery doesn't mean anything if you can't actually demonstrate the abiogenesis, emergence of life, macro evolution etc., you hypothesize is taking place.

[@L-8]

@@knowone11111 You don’t need to “demonstrate” something to prove it. No one has watched Neptune orbit the sun, as it takes 165 years, but we still know scientifically that Neptune does in fact orbit the Sun, through rational inference. Macroevolution is grounded in extensive irrefutable evidence from paleontology and genetics. The fossil record showcases the progressive development of species in a way that can only be explained by evolution, and practically single-handedly proves it - but that isn’t necessary because genetic studies further prove the shared ancestry of lifeforms, as well as the fact that the Earth has been dated thousands of times showing that it has been around for the billions of years that evolution requires. On the other hand, creationism and Noah’s Flood lack empirical support and contradict established principles in paleontology and biology. These so-called ‘alternative interpretations of the evidence’ fall short in addressing the robust scientific foundation supporting macroevolution. There is no single accepted scientific theory of abiogenesis, although we certainly have discovered evidence that tells us how it likely occured (like the Miller-Urey experiment, but certainly not only that). Abiogenesis in some way or another is the most scientific and plausible explanation.

[@njhoepner]

@@knowone11111 1. The presentation invites mockery, in fact begs for it. 2. As for "demonstrate abiogenesis," I don't really have to, for two reasons: a) Evolution is well enough supported by the evidence we already observe - something of which creationism has zero. b) For science, " we don't [yet] know" is the beginning. It's only for religious people that it is the end. "We don't know x, therefore god" is god of the gaps by definition...and would bring about the end of science if real scientists were foolish and lazy enough to buy into it. Just because you see something you can't [yet] explain does not mean it is the work of an invisible magical superbeing. That kind of lazy thinking would be the end of science. Fortunately, the deceivers at Lies in Genesis and The Anti-Discovery Institute are only convincing to their own choirs.

[@knowone11111]

@@njhoepner Scientific research has to be, observable, testable & repeatable. Anything short of meeting this criteria is either failure or 'faith' that one day your assumptions will be proven by more information. You're not being honest with me or yourself.

[@johnnyxmusic]

I’m trying to find the logic in saying that the very same flood that laid down the layers of sediment or rock of the Grand Canyon, was then, somehow almost simultaneously washed out by that same flood water. Honey, that doesn’t make sense.

[@youBrakeIHonk]

Well, that was excellent

[@betsieswartz]

What are the two letters after M

[@youBrakeIHonk]

@@betsieswartz hehe

[@billypaxton9295]

The canyon could also be electric damage. Kinda like the scar on mars.

[@barryblackwood6050]

How could that explain the shelf of debris in the Pacific at the mouth of the river of such size?.