MPs Reject Johnson's Election Plans... Why? - Brexit Explained

[@JavaMuko]

I kind of lost track what this video was about due to the podcast section. I feel it's less to the point than regular videos and very much just a way to promote the podcast rather than provide an informative video

[@KlickPy]

I think the problem is that it changes from him giving you direct sentences to it being a conversation and that makes it difficult to follow the ideas and points that are being presented.

[@KlickPy]

And they talk very fast and the mic quality varies a little.

[@luffytrace1]

He spends far too long promoting himself. It’s a shame because his content is great

[@MrKh4O]

luffytrace1 the content isn’t that great anymore, it’s all about self promoting!

[@noirguitarsuperstar3410]

And they have the WORST audio. It's like a 2008 podcast.

[@Alpha372]

The mixing of the classic TLDR video formats with your new podcast does not really fit well......it's mixing an "explain" video with a ...well podcast "discussion" ...for me that lowers the quality of your videos significantly which is sad because I really liked the old format.

[@ryanbamforth1290]

I totally agree. Keep them separated

[@manapany_6392]

Totally agree too

[@bennygoat]

I agree totally

[@ben9090210]

Agreed, tbh i just drop the vid when the podcast stuff starts.

[@shekel8245]

They're just advertising. Give them a break

[@JoelBurke1]

The mix of the podcast with the normal format is pretty offputting

[@the33rdguy]

Joel Burke I agree I think the two should be separate

[@aleximery8260]

Agreed

[@lightontheceiling]

I really like the podcasts, but agreed they should be kept out of the main content of main channel videos, bar a plug here or there. I don't mind the parliamentary clips though, they give a bit of context!

[@javiercamacho2066]

If they continue to add podcasts, soon its going to be TLDL news. Too long, Didnt Listen

[@longpredave]

I find this format makes your videos completely unclear and defeats the reason I follow your Chanel. This did not explain why even with a majority the motion failed. Please go back to you're regular explain videos.

[@habilsubarqah]

Please keep your explanation videos and podcasts separated.

[@mediatube3527]

Completely agree. This new style contains lots of superfluous padding which may end up ruining this oherwise great channel for me

[@Seppes94]

The Podast just doesn`t live up to the standarts of a normal tl;dr video. Because, well... it`s a podcast. Don`t mix them up.

[@zhiyuanlu8039]

other wise it is turning into TLDL... too long don't listen...

[@V1ct0v]

Please don't do more podcast segments! TLDRnews is great because it explains things clearly, the podcast segment is pure chatter and reduces TLDRNews to a regular mainstream news channel, which all just feature chatter between reporters nowadays.

[@angelkennethtolentino8261]

Yeah, I agree. I'm getting realy annoyed with the podcast section.

[@johnydl]

generally, I'm getting fatigued with TLDR, cause what could be 2-3 minute videos are often being dragged out to get extra KZbin advertising slots in with all the "go watch our previous video to find out more about this" but in brief here's 90% of the information and "join us on ...." the show's are now almost Too Long; Don't Watch

[@Alpha372]

The amount of "original content" in this video is only 1 minute 15 seconds..... the rest is: - Advertisements for multiple TLDR channels, podcasts, etc. - Recycled uncommented content snippets from the parliament live stream - Recycled content from the TLDR podcast As much as I liked the channel so far, if this is how the future of TLDR looks like ...oh boy

[@casper020198]

I'm getting annoyed about the fact that they explain the same things in most of the videos, like the detailed explanation of prorogation in every video for 2 months. I feel like they should other stuff than Brexit if they can't make enough new content about it

[@sickbailey21]

​@@johnydl the problem with this though, is that you expect high quality content but the author not to be paid for making it. You want both ends of the spectrum it would seem. I would love it if the guy spent weeks, months, or even years researching each video upload, making sure there's no mistakes in the video or anything like that and ensuring its as concise as possible - no time wasted at all. The idea of him doing that whilst also asking him to not get ad revenue and work another full time job to be able to make these videos for me in his free time, well is frankly ridiculous. We all have bills to pay and I'm pretty sure this guy has to pay his editor for each video already. People need to have reasonable expectations of their fellow humans. If someone else already does exactly what you want, go watch them and also pay attention to see how long they last.

[@SRFriso94]

I will say, adding in the podcast into your videos that always have fairly clean scripts and slick animations feel very messy.

[@SEAN-kw9ek]

I'm guessing this is partly down to practicalities - in order to keep these videos coming so quickly, which they need to do or else they will be outdated before they are uploaded due the speed at which politics is moving, then I'm guessing it's a bit quicker and easier to insert clips of a podcast than to prepare new scripts/animations etc....for each video (I'm guessing, but I'm not an expert on video editing). I don't think it dilutes the content or impact of the videos, it's just a different way of doing it. Either way it's a good thing that TDLR are managing to keep pace with events.

[@fadc86]

@@SEAN-kw9ek You are totally right. He's just trying to economize content. Those animations take a lot of time and effort to be made. It's extremely admirable what they do.

[@benchilcott6908]

@@SEAN-kw9ek They managed before the podcast came about, I think they're just trying to promote the podcast. Kind of annoying though since we get reminded of that at the start and end of every video anyway.

[@ridavanderkam3536]

And some people don't like the podcast format to boot.

[@bobfoster7177]

They’re doing a great job and have produced an exceptional amount of content in a very short space of time. The podcast do seem a bit scrappy in contrast with the video but what they’re saying is spot on.

[@NGBRADLEY1991]

Lads I love your videos but recently they have been super messy. I know you guys are moving into a new studio right now but I’d rather you put out less vids until that process is over. Quality over quantity. The animations obscuring the text, the talking to the camera sections, the choppy editing, the messy audio, the excessive plugs, merch mentions and calls to subscribe (I understand it has to be done but your over doing it now) and now your mixing in your podcast (which absolutely does not fit an explained video format) into the videos to promote it rather than doing what’s best for the video at hand. You guys are trying to do too much too quickly and it shows. There’s no rush, from the channel gradually.

[@Felishamois]

thank you, what I wanted to say

[@MrKh4O]

Very well said moinseur! Forgot to mention his face being added to the videos! We’re here for good content, not to skip all the merch portions! Seems like £ got the control of this channel!

[@ACoroa]

The animation over the text was getting on my nerves!!! Thanks for mentioning it.

[@KryzMasta]

Totally agree with all points. And I realize the anxiety that comes with moving from an extracurricular activity to a full time job, so getting money in to support the channel is very important, but the best way to grow is to keep do what you’re doing: great, clear and clean content. No sales, no soliciting for likes and subs, no endless cross-platform referencing and no quantity over quality. Don’t buy quality with subs, buy subs with quality. And if in the end you can’t make it financially sustainable, you couldn’t have changed that by begging. Integrity above all.

[@iuks2185]

Keep your podcast separate from your TLDR videos!!

[@anurgaprasad123]

I prefer the old format even if it takes longer to make. I dont mind a video every 2-4 days.

[@jayit6851]

I do! Things are moving so fast in British politics right now that they'd fall behind of have to skip covering things.

[@LlamaJordan]

Having the podcast sections really ruins the flow of the video. I miss old TLDR. :(

[@IJustLoveStories]

6:07 I don't think this is a good way to plug your podcast. For one, you're essentially citing yourself as an authority on the subject, which I have no reason to believe is warranted. Secondly, we, as viewers, really have no idea who the people speaking are. We don't know what their background is or why we should care about their thoughts on the matter. As a result it just becomes a kind of white noise. Lastly, there's a real issue with mixing the fact checked news content with free speculation and/or opinion, especially when the same voice that usually speaks with that fact checked authority presents in both segments. It creates needless confusion about the truth value of the information delivered. I think it's a matter of journalistic ethics and your integrity that you find a better way to plug your podcasts in future videos.

[@Alpha372]

totally agree. It really dilutes the quality of the otherwise good "infographic" parts

[@RronKarahoda]

ThatGuyWithHisHat You've nailed exactly what has got me feeling unnerved during the podcast segments! I agree wholeheartedly.

[@pconaty]

Agree totally.

[@DaniStarEngland]

Well put

[@marcuslit4576]

BJ: We will take the UK out of the EU Corbyn: Okay, how do you plan to renegotiate the backstop? BJ: You're a chlorinated chicken. And repeat.

[@quenchize]

How does Corbyn plan to renegotiate it? I mean its all very well being opposed to no deal, but you have to be in favour of something else. At least the Liberals have a concrete position (albeit since they know they will never be called on to implement it) The problem (as demonstrated by the indicative votes) is that there is no majority in the house for ANY of the options potentially available to us. The house would be much better spending its time trying to reach a consensus on what they actually do want. The proposal for remaining in the customs union but leaving anything else we can got the most votes and IMO it is a very reasonable compromise given the 50/50 division we have in this country. Sorry I ranted a bit, not all directed at your comment

[@aidena8381]

@@quenchize I think Labour wanted something similar the Norway model, but the EU will not budge on the backstop.. I think its a real stickler. Labour seems to have a very vague idea for a deal but I don't think anyone is going to get the EU to budge.. its very tricky and difficult. Red, Blue, Green or Yellow I am uncertain is anyone is going to convince the EU to ditch the backstop.

[@aliens7719]

I would say the labour could manage to get some kind of deal and then put it on the people’s vote with 3 options, leave with their deal, leave without a deal and remain. This could unblock the situation, but always if there’s a majority.

[@marcuslit4576]

​@@quenchize Valid points, but I was aiming at BJ's rhetoric and his inability to answer any questions directly. Usually he just does a bit of name-calling and then sits down. Not that that's unique, but it would be nice for the man in sort-of charge to have some grasp of the details, especially since he's been such a vocal Brexiteer for so long. Ideally, he should know Brexit inside out. He has never demonstrated a working knowledge of the complications of Brexit, at least not that I've seen. I agree that Labour is a bit of a mess, which is a shame because the Tories are falling apart so the bar isn't very high. I think EEA membership makes the most sense personally, but (thankfully) I'm not in charge.

[@joaquim64rodrigues]

@@aidena8381 The backstop is the less damaging solution in what concerns to the Irish issue and could accommodate the GFA, the single market, free movement, etc . Unfortunately it will never be accepted by the brexit side so it´s pointless. I think there´s no solution with this parliament or any future parliament. The people´s will simply can´t be implemented (a portuguese view).

[@BryanCheong]

This video was mostly a collection of parliament clips with a podcast segment appended. It didn't really explain anything, I feel.

[@desmon]

GRRrrrr...was happy to get a proper video and then it we went into podcast mode...thank you for the information but I personally hate the format :)

[@jerryork]

Bojo: I have no plan so I will insult everyone very loudly and gesticulate wildly.

[@MrBizteck]

Worked for Trump.

[@aliens7719]

They’re mates isn’t it???

[@MrBoboiscool]

BoJo's plan: SHOUT LOUDLY, CATCHPHRASES AND SOUNDBITES, BLAME EVERYONE ELSE FOR MY OWN MESS. and repeat.

[@ttz4m3]

@@MrBizteck yeh, but Trump is actually good at it.

[@SASMADBRUV7]

@@ttz4m3 that's actually true. Whether you like him or not, he does that role really well.

[@CharalamposKoundourakis]

I don't really like having a it of the podcast in the videos as it just discourages me from listening to the podcast.

[@spoopytime9928]

*It was time for Jo Johnson to leave. He had seen everything.*

[@chansolpark6860]

the transition from Jojo's to Bojo's Bizarre Adventures is now complete

[@orangecrush6215]

If he voted against his brother he would've gotten The Whip (removed). 🙃

[@SaturnusDK]

It is time for BoJo to leave. We have seen enough.

[@mobiuscoreindustries]

@@chansolpark6860 BoJo's Brexit Adventures season 4 is just the best!

[@Alpha372]

@@orangecrush6215 Isn't that a possible reason why he quit, to save his brother from that awkward situation?

[@ReasonSama]

I understand you want to plug your podcast but this is counterproductive. You are making people hate it because it doesn’t mesh well. Please stop doing this in the future

[@BitsOfBen]

You've built a channel with an original format. It's been going great. It's great that you have a podcast too but you shouldn't mix the two. Don't ruin what you've already built.

[@wildroseabbieeify]

He sounds like he can barely string a coherent sentence, let alone actually answer any questions put forward to him. Good lord.

[@Iazzaboyce]

So why is the opposition is so afraid of allowing the people to decide?

[@biocapsule7311]

@@Iazzaboyce Oh they aren't afraid of letting the people decide, lets make it jan 2020? After an extension is asked? lol

[@Dear_Mr._Isaiah_Deringer]

@@Iazzaboyce Fine. Second referendum it is.

[@MrBizteck]

@jovi b Never interrupt your foe while he's making a fool of himself.

[@Iazzaboyce]

@@biocapsule7311 They are behind in the polls and divided. How long can they run chicken from the people? If Boris goes no-deal Brexit Party will not stand. Corbyn is about ten years past his best before date and he's always been a scrawny chicken. Labour only did well last time because half UKIP vote thought Labour would have to Brexit. The people will end this - the traitors will be humiliated.

[@1urie1]

Corbyn: "Can you prove you're negotiating?" BoJo: "No but I can insult you!"

[@metametodo]

And unfortunately it seems that that's all it takes these days to win the public and maybe even elections.

[@theartemisgland]

You dont seem to realize that nobody likes labour in consrrvative party so I doubt they even axtually listen to what Corby has to say.

[@fdaunja]

To be fair Jeremy Corbyn is the personification of a spiteful spit of phlegm.

[@metametodo]

@@fdaunja even if that were a fact, that still wouldn't justify insulting, especially in such an important context and issue. Everyone insult and despise someone, but the problem is that Bojo leads the country in school kid manner, that's not the right context for that attitude.

[@Mathignihilcehk]

Compulsive Walker yes it is. Politicians do and have almost always lead their countries in a school kid manner. They just didn’t used to let cameras in the room, or when they did, nobody watched it or understood the lingo. Using fancy language does not make the discussion more mature, but it does help keep the public out of the loop. What demagogues like Boris Johnson do is use language you can actually understand... and then people get upset when they realize our government is run by effectively toddlers with connections. Same is true in the US. Pretty much any country with a democratic system will be run by immature idiots. Why? Because the method to select representatives (popular vote) by design, fundamentally elects those with the most connections, not those with the most merit or capability. We hope connections = intellect. Not true.

[@Zmax15]

Johnson: If MPs don’t support me, we’ll have to call for an election! MPs: (Don’t support Johnson) Johnson: An election then! MPs: (Don’t support Johnson) Johnson: :V

[@KlickPy]

They might be pushing for him to have a 100% loss rate lol

[@kelvindoang1228]

Loo and they complain that we wasn't elected. Such dictactor

[@chadleach6009]

If they dont support an election its the people, not Johnson that are losing support. Sad when elected officials can stay if office by refusing to give the public a say.

[@uncannyvalley2350]

Hahahaa, you're selling your own kids and country down the river cos zionist kgb funded racism. Only need to hear a Brexit smear to see these guys are either shills or even worse, VOLUNTEERS Loooool

[@Zmax15]

Dane Lloyd I’m not in your country.

[@jersn5560]

Jesus christ, I thought it was just me, numerous time I refreshed my browser because all of a sudden the video audio changed. Please bring back the old format!

[@stephenhewlett3504]

Could you post timestamps to the actual video content because its terribly exhausting to listen to the same drivel about your merch, podcasts etc etc every video. I enjoy the content but it feels like majority of my time is spent listening to promotions.

[@Toni_N]

Totally agree

[@flobojarbo]

Agreed

[@gawkthimm6030]

I use Ublock and tampermonkey until they fix these issues

[@DustWolphy]

Double tap screen on mobile to skip 10 seconds. Do it twice and it skips the ads well enough.

[@imborahey7568]

Can you please keep the podcast out of these videos? It feels like you're just trying to bump it up to 10 minutes

[@kaisalmon1646]

The 10 minutes threshold only allows to add more ads in the middle of the video, iirc, so since tldr has none I don't think this is what is happening. I think he's just both trying to plug his podcast and reduce his workload in these busy times. I stand with the supermajority of the comments though, not a good format

[@antros]

@@kaisalmon1646 actually, he does have ads in the middle

[@FaerieDust]

@@kaisalmon1646 TLDR is monetized, though. At least, I've started getting an ad break around the middle of the video 🤷

[@kaisalmon1646]

Ah, I stand corrected 😅

[@Alpha372]

@@kaisalmon1646 yup also getting mid-roll ads...and now we know why the latest videos seem so awfully stretched......because they are

[@Tuang]

Ok these podcast bits are ruining these videos. Its TLDR cause we dont want to read or listen to stuffs that we dont need, and these videos are TO POINT. And now the podcasts undo everything. Let me know when no more podcast bits are added anymore

[@Guldmann266]

It's such a shame that a channel called TLDR news has forced itself to make every video longer than 10 minutes for monetary gain, essentially removing the point of the channel. This channel was one of my favorite ones, but all this filler has made me dislike it more and more. I hope this channel will get back to it's roots.

[@TimKhalikov]

Guld Mann totally agree. This format full of repetitions and obvious facts is really below the quality of what they used to make.

[@petersebok9284]

I am not a member of TLDR. I have my own channel as well. Content isn't for free. How much are you willing to pay for content?

[@funwithrandom360]

Because he quit his job to do this full time, he needs the revenue

[@petersebok9284]

@@funwithrandom360 white English people don't "work". What they call work is counting their income from dividends of financial assets

[@conors4430]

Guld Mann I think it’s more of a shame is that you insist on a complex reality being compressed down to bite-size little simplified pieces regardless of the situation on the ground

[@yaelavivi501]

I think what disturbs the clear and coherent character of the video in that podcast segment, is the phrase "nobody really knows". People have come to expect informative videos which mostly discuss known or proven facts, and just waiting for the next one if something is yet uncertain.

[@Haxerous]

Just gonna say don't try to fix what isn't broken.

[@ovinel]

Please stop plugging so much crap in your videos. It was OK but recently, your videos are poorer quality and the podcast part was even worse. Keep the recipe that worked. Dislike!

[@funwithrandom360]

Because he quit his job to do this full time, he needs the revenue.

[@ryangriffith5551]

This new format is bad. Please change it back!

[@maxwelllcfc8951]

Too long; didn't watch, along with the last few 10-minute videos. I feel much of what happened the past few days wouldn't need more than 5 minutes of my time reading.

[@MPedich]

Damn, Boris really is the British Trump. He has nothing to say, so he just wings it

[@MPedich]

WTF have I just read?

[@BeCaffe]

* Grabs popcorn (and tin foil hat, just in case) *

[@jamalpeoples3736]

This new format is trash. Who thought this was a good idea? They should be sacked immediately.

[@petersebok9284]

Sack Jack Kelly

[@antillope]

I think the quality of 'TLDR' is being significantly lowered by artificially extending the duration of videos.

[@SteveItOut]

I don't agree, I think it's still the very best way to get all the relevant information on a topic in one place.

[@zlamanit]

@@SteveItOut this channel used to have focused explanatory videos. Now in this video alone we have promotion, unstructured discussion and speculations, almost random fragments of the parliamentary debate, and some summary.

[@SteveItOut]

@@zlamanit It's almost like there's so much madness going on it's hard to consolidate it into nice bite size bits and get it out in time for it still to be relevant.

[@1984Mateo]

I have to give this channel some damn credit. I got addicted to this Brexit series tonight (in States) and as soon as I finish he drops ANOTHER ONE! I want to donate to give you a holiday!

[@hermit4706]

Oh you don't get holidays in the UK anymore, gotta work until you drop down dead just to keep a float 😩

[@1984Mateo]

Hermit 470 Wow...sounds familiar! 🦅

[@mrmagoo-i2l]

Hermit 470 You are saying that to an American!!! They get 2 weeks holiday a year. Sometimes they’re not even entitled to that.

[@1984Mateo]

Lesser Spotted Mugwump. To be fair you are talking to a teacher so I would get summer holiday if I didn’t work a second job

[@danltc9392]

hey TLDR, i suggest removing ur podcast from ur vids. i hope i speak for the majority, but when i watch one of your videos, it is to catch up on the current affairs base on facts, not listen to you nor your writer's opinions/forecast. as a few others has stated in the comments section. adding the podcast clips does indeed make the video extremely messy.

[@dachd]

Small tip for you @TLDR News, please stop making such a long noiseless pauses, it always makes me think the video stopped buffering

[@justinak517]

I’m in my 40s and this is the first time in living memory that politicians have ever had something truly important to work on to shape the future of the U.K. I think that leave or remain we can all agree that this is a room full of the most extraordinarily inept bunch of self serving assh*oles in the country, that in any other industry would have been sacked long ago for their incompetence. The worst part of which is that those with the most power are members of the upper class aristocracy that stand to lose very little whatever the outcome, as they will always retain their position and wealth and have no understanding or interest in the ramifications for those of us that actually stand to have our lives affected by all this. Welcome to U.K. parliament!

[@psych0536]

thats not just uk parliament. that's just representative democracy as a whole. it's very much flawed

[@Nemesis-lg6zf]

I can't imagine you'll get any arguments from anyone on that.

[@mimilion6072]

Totally agree.

[@AdderSnakeVideos]

I enjoy your short and succinct videos but bloating it at the end with the podcast segment didn’t make it feel very TLDR.

[@alancox9027]

I agree with others in the comments section that the podcasts should not be included in these youtube videos, I am all for the promotion of it at the start of the video but adding clips of the podcast into the video seems messy. I've subscribed to the podcast but do not feel the urge to listen now i've heard/watched a snippet in this video. Please return to the clear well formatted videos we are used to.

[@jorenbaplu5100]

is it me or does Bercow look tired, i hope he keeps it up

[@willy_dot]

Was thinking the same

[@BigHenFor]

He will. He committed to making sure things are done in the right way.

[@jayit6851]

I thought the same his "division" seemed so tired of everyone's shit

[@ruthbashford3176]

Bercow needs to be kicked out as he's supposed to be neutral and he clearly isn't!

[@Crick1952]

Boris's disses are as weak as his majority in Parliament

[@chadleach6009]

You mean the one being held up by his opposition too afraid to call a general election?

[@ONeill01]

@@chadleach6009 Then back the bill

[@uncannyvalley2350]

Smear, slur, deflect, repeat Brexit: courtesy cambridge analytica and black cube

[@Sham1r0]

Wow boi u got a podcast now congrats, please keep em seperate tho 👌

[@资深老司机-u1r]

mixing with the podcast made your explaining videos not so delicate as before, please find a better way not to lower the quality, maybe you don't have to upload everyday.

[@TheRealD4]

You DID NOT explain the position of Labour not agreeing to an election AND Boris refusing to request an extension which is how it stands NOW as the EU have failed to amend the WA to what Boris wants re: Backstop, etc. Doesn't this mean Boris can easily sit back and run down the clock and wait for the EU to shift their position otherwise its NO DEAL on 31st Oct?

[@zomaarwat9]

Thank you for abusing your channel to advertize for the podcast. Could skip through most of it.

[@tarnished439]

Name calling is so uncivilised. My respect for Boris has therefore dropped as much as his credibility

[@KingofCabal]

Hi, if I may I would suggest keeping the normal videos separate from the podcast videos. You could always rather make a podcast highlights video. This is something that you could put less effort into editing and would be easier to publish. Would definitely be interested in this. Mixing the vids don't seem to work well though. I would rather suggest reducing the amount of normal vids if it takes to much time to produce to maintain the quality, the podcast highlights and quick update vids could then substitute for the gaps. Also if you aren't familiar with the other guys we have no idea if we should consider their opinions credible or not, I might suggest having them do some separate videos also to build up some credibility in your audience's eyes.

[@adamsfusion]

I don't dislike the podcasts, however it doesn't fit the feeling I go for in the main series. When I watch the main series, I'm looking for this quick, snappy overview of what happened just before I go into work. The podcasts at the ends feel like, and I know this isn't true, but it feels like the last half of the video went unproduced and so a brainstorming session was thrown in and animations layered on top. I would prefer those parts be consolidated into the general way the videos are normally produced.

[@dMonstrosities]

also downvoting the podcast content, it's garbage

[@Miiias]

So you need a super majority for another general election, but only a normal majority to leave the EU, I think they got the priorities wrong

[@mikefarrell6916]

Explain super and normal majorities please

[@Miiias]

@@mikefarrell6916 super 2/3 of the votes, normal 1/2 of the votes, he used it(super majority) in the video, so I assumed it was correct way of saying it ^^

[@mikefarrell6916]

@@Miiias .if you get half of the votes you can't have a majority in a yes/ no vote .A majority is a majority .over 50 pc of votes .You can have a large or substantial or , small , majorities.

[@mikefarrell6916]

@@Miiias .to call a GE mid term you need a certain amount of mps to vote for it .. .as for leaving the EU even with a majority it does not look like we are leaving. . Death of democracy

[@TheJakeOn]

Dont what a podcoast just what the old format. If it's not broke don't fix it.

[@David13ushey]

Yes, I agree, The podcast's inclusion was jarring. The podcast itself isn't BAD, but the transition was a full stop.

[@alanredversangel]

3:05 "Well he can F........"

[@jim_ginge]

Nice cutting there I must say :D

[@AdamKyles]

Prime Ministers' Question time is worth watching for anyone who wonders what "Bunch of grumpy 6 year olds question time" would be like.

[@evanthomas3778]

Clicked on this video straight away cause I'm confused about the party tactics surrounding an election. Unfortunately didn't get the answer I was looking for, which is a first for this channel. Just some feedback. Sorry.

[@ianotimelord]

Labour as your chap said in the podcast will wait until a no deal has a zero chance of a no deal. Then they will call it

[@razza83]

The constant advertising of your own material is getting a bit much. I enjoy the content, less so the push to subscribe or watch other videos, which I already do. Your time would be better spent QCing your video before uploading.

[@LaurensPP]

It seems to me that nobody there really wants to leave the EU.

[@chmax73]

This is the first time I have not seen one of your videos till the end. The Podcast part ruins everything.

[@ChristianIce]

You can't vote against the default option without picking another. Somebody please throw a bucket of water on all MPs to wake them up.

[@Pepsidot]

Pro tip: Always skip 1 min into every 'tldr' News vid.

[@gawkthimm6030]

to get past the nagging advertisement

[@DanielPetri]

The podcast section was horribly offputting, don't do that

[@Boreasos]

Have to agree with the sentiment that mixing your traditional video format with an audio clip from a podcast is not ideal and feels messy.

[@JacksonG.F.]

Prorogation resets the clock on whether or not the same motion can be made twice. This question was posed to the speaker when May’s government tried to reintroduce her plan earlier this year. The answer was that after a prorogation, the same motion CAN be made as before the prorogation

[@Junyo]

This video was basically a re-hashing of stuff that has already been covered by your videos. A waste of time and way too long and chaotic as well. Will not watch videos like this one again.

[@charlesjmouse]

So our shamefully incompetent MPs continue to "debate" what music the band should play while the ship goes down. When the 31st rolls round, regardless of what they may have come up with, the EU will simply say "That's All Folks, bye." The UK will be out of the EU without a deal, for good or for ill, and the house of commons will be further exposed as the chumps they are. I don't suppose our head of state has been conducting her own negotiations? Maybe on the 31st we'll have a proclamation along the lines of "We are pleased to announce we have agreed an equitable brexit deal with the EU that we are pleased to pass in to law on the behalf of our country and it's people. The alternative is another civil war." A drowning man will grasp at any straw.

[@elvibora3965]

New format is akward if not messy. Just sayin. This might drive off viewers.

[@njujuwd3495]

The difference between the Britsh Parlement and many other parlaments is really big....

[@redguard12]

Don't know how this is supposed to work, but get your podcast on Castbox, please :P

[@TLDRnews]

Were working on getting it everywhere but it seems to take a while. We will update our website once it's in more places so keep an eye out!

[@FernandoGomez-hg4rn]

The thing with the podcast is that it's not TL;DR.

[@literate-aside]

Please don’t shoehorn the podcast in again. I like the channel, I like the podcast, but the two do *not* belong together.

[@alessandromilano1989]

How has the parliament passed May's deal? Please explain, How has been passed by default, and what are the reasons and consequences?

[@uncannyvalley2350]

It was a clause that invoked it, but can be voted down by the lords. The issue was more about the sneaky way they got it in, when there was no one in to count the opposition votes

[@xJanx1000]

Might it be possible that Boris would rather (illegally) break the bill which should have prevented the No Deal Brexit instead of asking for a Delay? So maybe he will let a No deal Brexit happen and face the judicial consequences later? Would that be possible at all?

[@allthatchas]

Then there will be a no confidence vote on Oct 19th, and Jeremy Corbyn will ask for a delay.

[@MrBizteck]

Thats based on your faith that the rule of law will result in Justice.

[@allthatchas]

I don't think so. There's a deadline in the bill well before the 31st.

[@xJanx1000]

@@allthatchas but would corbyn even have the authority to do that?

[@Victoriacariad]

The mps also legally voted to pass article 50 which said we would leave with or without a deal on the 29th of March. Most of the MP's were elected into parliament with a manifesto that said they would respect the referendum and leave the EU.

[@tapewormrage]

He called their bluff. They know they don’t have the support and if they lose their majority, Brexit actually happens. Easy.

[@luiszapata6864]

Yeah bro... leave the videos as they were: explanatory alone, clear and short. Podcasts for full review of the topic. But don't mix them!

[@puthiyedathu]

Okay.. now that's the first TLDR news I couldn't finish and writing a comment just after 3 minutes of watching the video. As one of the subscribers mentioned below the 'quality', 'clarity', and 'quantity' is all over the place. I hope the TLDR team will take the comments seriously and bring the quality of the old animated videos back where everything was said clearly straight to the point and with nice animations. Thank you for all the work done and I hope you are able to continue the good work you did in the past. Thank you.

[@ankit-prasad]

I enjoy your podcasts when I'm driving, but these videos that switch from 'information' to 'podcast' mode is really crappy. There's a loss in quality for an informational video, not to mention it becomes too long for a TLDR explanation. If you really want to promote your podcast, you'd be better off giving us the TLDR information here, and then saying 'for a more detailed discussion on this topic, listen to today's podcast episode'.

[@FireBlade9773]

So, despite that muppet's criticisms of Labour's "ambiguity"....Labour is once again playing it correctly.

[@Turtytreeandaturd]

Will the EU accept an extension?

[@thepolticalone961]

Yes probably

[@abrunosON]

EU can't afford losing UK.

[@thepolticalone961]

@@abrunosON they can

[@scorpixel1866]

@@abrunosON Definitely can, not even a question, it's just that in an economical standpoint we'd rather not

[@dangernoodle2868]

@@abrunosON prefering that the UK stay doesn't mean that the EU can't afford to lose it.

[@toddy47b]

mixing podcast with your normal videos is the biggest disappointment since brexit

[@6Man666666]

The crisp succinct narrative is undermined by podcasts. This isn’t beneficial to the high standard of your videos

[@grahamwells173]

Its totally disgusting the way these MPs are behaving

[@SamuelOrjiM]

Which part and why?

[@OMGitshimitis]

As am I, trying to do something so obviously against the national interest should mean they don't get voted in but hey what can you do people keep voting Conservative.

[@SamuelOrjiM]

@@OMGitshimitis how do you decide what the countries interests are

[@OMGitshimitis]

@@SamuelOrjiM by looking at the likely results of an action and seeing whether that will make the country a better place to live. A medicine shortage, recession and rioting wouldn't make the country better so a no deal Brexit isn't in the country's interest. I assume you think it is in the country's interest, why?

[@SamuelOrjiM]

@@OMGitshimitis no I don't I just like watching people who ignorantly allow their government oppress my people spew garbage about democracy

[@MichaelSeixDubstep]

please never put podcast sections in these videos again

[@manheap12]

Great channel, deserves way more credit

[@scottalbers2518]

Totally agree.

[@presstodelete1165]

My prediction is Johnson may bring back Parliament early in order to prevent Labour Party conferance.

[@sirBrouwer]

he can't call parliament back until the Queen has reopened parliament. parliament is not above the crown.

[@sirBrouwer]

@Tea Lover no it's a constitutional monarchy she does have some power. when the prime minister asks the queen to open a new parliament and she grands it they can't un ask it. that would bring the crown in discredit and that is not done.

[@uncannyvalley2350]

Amazing to watch your country destroying itself just to avoid the only politician who doesn't grovel for the elite, I'm sure it has nothing to do with Israeli slush money and hedge funds. Didn't nigel Farage get done for insider trading? Isn't cambridge analytica an Israeli company? Isn't brexit in Russias favour? Hmmm, maybe we should ask Boris' the young turk Johnson's 8th cousin twice removed the king of israel. Hmmmmm

[@marhobane3040]

Boris really ought to call an election by order-in-council. This FTPA thing is total bollocks.

[@genius11433]

5:19 Did anyone else notice that Bercow wasn't as lively with his "DIVISIOOOOOOON!"? It was as if even _he_ was like "Let's just get this over with already."

[@asdcdweadasd]

You make a lot of videos, and it explains the rather simple editing and graphics recycled and nauseum. Frankly, it's fine. But the podcast doesn't sit well with the video. Switching from single narrator to three, from narration to dialogue and vastly different microphones causes an information indigestion

[@Shabbymannen]

Here is another comment agreeing that the new format isn't very good. Go back to the old format. Do the podcast on the side. I recommend this channel to people, and if this format prevails, I will no longer be able to do so.

[@paulofortza3301]

Boris doesn’t have to extend the deadline, he could completely ignore the advice from parliament. MP’s cannot for the PM to sign anything in a treaty, it’s the PM”s prerogative power to ignore it.

[@josephmabena276]

Well he kinda does have to. Once the bill passes it’s a law that he has to follow.

[@orangecrush6215]

@@josephmabena276 What if he doesn't? Vote of no confidence, general election?

[@davidmaxwaterman]

How is it the 'ayes' and 'nos' sounded of relatively even volume, but the counts are way different?

[@gawkthimm6030]

some people dont shout too loud, while others make their side sound much larger

[@ttz4m3]

Please keep the videos and podcasts seperate. The different styles don't mix well.

[@gusgone4527]

.Like many others (17.4 million plus) I am appalled by the behaviour of our parliament, both commons and lords. I assume there is no need to outline what I consider betrayal of our assured referendum result. The vast majority of MP's from the main parties, were elected on the understanding that they would deliver BREXIT. A complete break away from the clutches of the EU monster and a return to independent sovereignty as outlined in the referendum pamphlet issued by HM Gov. The question is what can be done about it, now that those same MP's have decided to ignore the will of the people? This is unheard of in the history of parliament. Clearly our democracy is in crisis and may require redefining.

[@thomasvogt2823]

The podcast does not help the quality of your videos. I usually exit the video by the time the podcast part starts.

[@mikaham681]

Its clear that the Labour Party is simply playing politics regarding the election proposed by Johnson. Last week they wanted an election, this week they don't . Its not about what the people want, or lets see what the people want, its what do the Labour Party want. Its the same with Brexit, the majority of voters, want to LEAVE the EU and voted to do so in 2016, and again in the recent EU elections. But the Labour party and other remainers, have added conditions, that were never part of the 2016 referendum, to their perspective of what people want. How do they know people do or don't want their conditions, they don't! But they don't care either.

[@elliotgovierphotography]

I love your videos but it feels like you’re getting a bit lazy. The slick animations are nice and professional. But in recent videos you’ve started to put podcast segments and amateurish video which feels like a move in the wrong direction. Now that it’s your full time job and you have a team, and many more Patrion supporters, I would have thought you would want to keep the channel as professional and credible as possible? Love the channel, but I feel like it needs to be said

[@invictuslibertas6322]

Astounding. Aren’t these the same MPs that voted in BoJo as PM, yet they are now blocking him at every turn??? SMH.

[@uncannyvalley2350]

Brexit was a conservative project, he who makes the proposal is responsible for said proposal, not the opposition You conservatives obviously read way too much saul alinsky

[@AnAwakenedSpirit]

Please stop with the podcasts.... i for one will stop watching. Your strength is explaining briefly, clearly and simply complex parliamentary issues.