Expert advice on improving 3d prints (Fusion 360 Slicer Trick)

I learned this watching Makers Muse, how to use a slicer type simulator to get instant feedback on designs in Fusion 360.
Get The Coupon For My Fusion 360 Jumpstart
www.resources.techandespresso...
🎥Watch Next
Brand New User Series With Exercises bit.ly/brandnewuser
Quick Tips Series bit.ly/FusionQuickTips
23 Tips Beginners Should Learn bit.ly/Fusion23Tips
My Course 🚀
bit.ly/Fusion360Jumpstart
⚡Subscribe To Get The Latest Videos
bit.ly/SubscribeTechEspressoNow
💪🏼Support Me On Patreon
/ techandespresso
___________________________________________________________________
#Fusion360
#Fusion 360 Tutorial
___________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER
This video and description may contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps you support the channel at no extra cost to you and allows me to continue to make videos like this.

[@EnergySeeker]

very intersting video thanks , let me ask you this for 3d printing sometimes the part in the prusaslicer show the part not touching the bed 100% what is the soultion for that ?

[@alexferrari8413]

great video editing

[@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO]

Thank you!!!

[@jayinstandarddefinition]

Haha you said Magnus? It's Angus!

[@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO]

Oh wow. Thank you for the correction. I’ve been saying that for years. I’ve purchased two of his ebooks…still getting it wrong.

[@CraigHollabaugh]

Don't use fillets for this, only chamfers. Also, determine your printer's maximum overhang, then your chamfers can exceed 45 degrees.

[@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO]

I havent tested but i'm curious if fillets would be problematic? What result would you expect?

[@CraigHollabaugh]

@@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO 3D printing unsupported fillets will exceed the maximum overhang. Same problem with outside or inside fillets. Chamfers don't have this problem.

[@jayinstandarddefinition]

@@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO It's counter-intuitive but using a fillet you are creating a shape with much steeper angles than a chamfer.

[@jmunkki]

Actually... the inside part of your example would probably bridge just fine without modification. So there's really just one overhang between the two "rings" that definitely wouldn't print. You could do that with the chamfers, but then it's not really the same part. Personally, I like modeled supports. You could also do what I saw in another video recently where part of the print was done separately first. Then the second part was paused right where that first bit goes. Then the first print was manually put in place and finally the print was resumed, fusing the two parts strongly together. You could this part that way with absolutely no supports, but of course it's more work.

[@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO]

Cool! The chamfers worked perfectly for my design, the straps fit and printed well. But, I like your suggestion.

[@GeorgeGraves]

Next video this guy is going to discover the measure tool.

[@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO]

There is a measure tool!!!!????

[@thetroublecouple]

@@TylerBeckofTECHESPRESSO lol