UCAT : Arrow method for syllogisms

Feel free to support me at www.buymeacoffee.com/medichero DON'T FORGET TO DOWNLOAD THE SCRUBBED-IN E-BOOK THAT WE CREATED , IT HAS 80 PAGES FILLED WITH TECHNIQUES ,TIPS AND QUESTION BREAKDOWNS ALL TO HELP YOU ACE THIS UCAT EXAM ! SO WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR !!!
£15 FOR THE ucat-eBOOK
www.etsy.com/uk/listing/10216...
Any questions , please comment down below !
Subscribe to Scrubbedin !
Subscribe for more content! : / @medichero
Share this video with a friend:
• UCAT : Arrow method fo...
Watch next - • UCAT 2020 ! SCORE HIGH...
Let’s connect:
Instagram - Medic Hero
Instagram- Scrubbed in
Facebook - Medic Hero
Facebook- Scrubbed in
Any video suggestions , comment them down below !
By the way , my name is shumile (Medic Hero) and I am a medical student in the UK, nottingham/lincoln. I record and make videos about study(hopefully more towards medicine) , motivation , productivity and lifestyle .
I am also an ambassador scrubbed in and co-founder of medic tribe.
WWW.MEDICTRIBE.COM/UK
I'd love to talk to you , so message me
via instagram @medichero or via twitter @hero_medic (someone stole the name medichero, grrr) however if you are someone who loves sending paragraphs, just like you do to your crush , I am more than happy for you to send your message via email @[e-mail]
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER * Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. 1)This video has no negative impact on the original works 2)This video is also for teaching and inspirational purposes. 3)It is not transformative in nature. Medic Hero does not own the rights to these images, videos and audio files. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and motivate others for positive change. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact me by email at @
[e-mail]

[@sambell2152]

I have ADHD so I find most other UCAT tutorials difficult to watch, because they're always so long and full of waffle. Your videos however are concise and easy to follow. I watched this on 2x speed and still understood everything fine. This has helped me a lot. Thanks!

[@MedicHero]

That means so much to me ! Thank you very much , I am very glad you have been able to absorb content from my videos !! It will only encourage me to make more :)

[@victoriagoble1855]

Thank you so much for this! Am going to start this method tomorrow and hoping it pays off! It certainly was helping me as I was following you go through the questions! :)

[@MB-gk1ou]

Who even makes these scenarios though 😆 🤣 they become ridiculous day by day. Btw amazing video, found it just in time 🤌

[@Akira12364]

frrr lolll

[@prakz123]

you have changed the game !!!

[@ShubhamSingh-hc7vz]

This was really helpful, thank you

[@MedicHero]

I am really glad it helped !!!

[@nageshmachiraju6192]

Great explanation, so painstakingly prepared just to help others. God bless

[@justinlam5764]

Thanks for the tutorial !

[@MedicHero]

Happy to help!

[@zxcbnm7829]

DONT STOP MAKING VIDS

[@ireneifereohia8525]

Thanks so much for this. Very very helpful. God bless

[@MedicHero]

no worries ! really glad it helped ! :)

[@Mustafa-ve6mf]

Jazakallah brother

[@RA-il3rw]

Btw such a good method of shorthand

[@astrangeshape2761]

that makes it so much simpler ughhh thank u

[@MedicHero]

No worries !!! ☺️

[@jisikaicho8821]

Hi Sir, would that be okay if you do more practice questions about this syllogism and interpreting information in decision making. I found this very helpful.

[@rabiyafarooqui8462]

could “most” be considered as the second arrow?

[@omarfarouk7946]

I feel like this would work for the shorter statements given but could you possibly make a video where you go through this method in the longer statements? Thanks!

[@MedicHero]

Hey, sorry I didn’t understand what you meant by shorter statements (as they all have to be a max of 47 lines) , this just to provide some structure and get you started off !

[@MedicHero]

If you tell me what you mean , I’ll definitely look into it

[@omarfarouk7946]

@@MedicHero Apologies. I meant to say that maybe this method would be difficult to follow with the longer syllogism questions that have 3 or more lines of information. I may be wrong but it would be very helpful if you could possibly go through the more extended description syllogisms using this method. Thanks!

[@MedicHero]

Sorry my bad , KZbin glitched and showed this comment under another video instead the personal statement video so I was confused 😭😭😭wait let me te read the comment again now

[@MedicHero]

Yeah sure I can of course look into longer syllogisms as well !!

[@ak-7865]

What about the word only?

[@PIXELGamerzXvlogs]

i have aphantasia so i hope this improves my scores

[@MedicHero]

Oh my - I genuinely hope it helps - my advice to you would be to get used to writing short hand form notes - or even replacing key words with symbols BASICALLY modern day hieroglyphics (like the arrow method)

[@PIXELGamerzXvlogs]

@@MedicHero Do you, or people in general usually use their mind when doing the UCAT? I want to know how disadvantaged I am

[@Dandelion_flight]

I agree that drawing for DM is a great idea. That said for the example near the end about no doctor is anaemic and many vegetarians become anaemic, the last three questions did not necessarily need a diagram, they are very straightforward. I am not sure if you even resorted using the diagram as you were mostly reasoning out verbally. With regards to the second question 'some vegetarians are doctors' @9:09 Why can't the answer be 'Yes'? There can be doctors who are doctors but not anaemic since the statement says 'many vegetarians' but not 'all vegetarians are anaemic'. I don't think you actually used the diagram to solve the questions too.

[@RA-il3rw]

How does the first conclusion not follow but the second does 😖 its what’s losing me so many marks in DM

[@A7TGzed]

Which one ? No doctor is vegetarian the answer is no because it dosent say in the passage that doctors are vegetarians

[@TM-cb6gz]

Hi please could you clarify something? Throughout my practise questions on different platforms medentry/medify/tutoring each give a different answer to this question. If the stem says i.e. "Chris likes all mountains" and one of the options are "Chris likes some mountains" yes/no What would the answer be? My tutor said it would be yes because it IS true that he likes some mountains but the explanation on medentry states that it does not follow because the stem said 'all'. PLEASE HELP :(

[@yosifrasoul5754]

The definition given by UCAT for 'some' is 'An undetermined number being more than one but less than all. A part of it, not all of it' therefore Medentry is right

[@TM-cb6gz]

@@yosifrasoul5754 thanks. Its very confusing because this completely contradicts Medify and Medic mind. They say if 'All' then must also be some (not not vice versa obviously).

[@tomjohnson165]

I feel sorry for the anaemic vegetarians now

[@MedicHero]

Same here man

[@Lucybalmerr]

I have mine in 5 days pray for me 😩

[@MedicHero]

أَن يَشَاءَ اللَّهُ, all will be well !!

[@Akira12364]

did it go well

[@Lucybalmerr]

@@Akira12364 I got 2600 so not really lmaoo

[@shaikkygamesfc457]

Can't vegetarians be doctors as only some vegetarians are anemic therefore the non anemic vegetarians can be doctors

[@hopeshineseternal]

There 'could' be vegetarians who are doctors but we don't know that for sure. maybe all the non-anaemic vegetarians just don't want to be doctors. hence the statement cannot be concluded

[@AO-cu7xp]

Logically, yes some vegetarians "could" be Doctors. However, with the UCAT, you cannot assume or rely on the probability of this being true. If you cannot draw a solid conclusion from the statement, then the statement is false. :)

[@PJBoy]

ngl i dont think its useful

[@prabh6396]

yeahcuz u cant do this for the longer syllogisms man