Cheaper and Better Than a Rolex DateJust? | Watchfinder & Co.

If you’re making a run at the top spot, you’ve got to take on the alpha-and right now that’s Rolex’s DateJust. It’s been a long time coming, but Omega is finally ready to try and take its crown back from the young pretender, and it’s going to try with this, the Aqua Terra. It’s cheaper-but is it better?
Featured Watches:
Rolex DateJust 126300
Omega Aqua Terra 150M Co-Axial Master Chronometer 220.12.41.21.06.001
Shop now for Rolex watches:
www.watchfinder.com/Rolex/watches
Shop now for Omega watches:
www.watchfinder.com/Omega/watches
We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder
Watchfinder is the number one place to buy, sell and exchange premium pre-owned timepieces. Discover more exceptional watches at www.watchfinder.com

[@watchfinder]

We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

[@jonnyquatromusic]

I’ve owned both the Datejust and the Aqua Terra . The Aqua Terra was FAR superior by every measure. As everyone already knows, the Aqua Terra has better specifications, movement, materials, and value, but in addition, it looks INCREDIBLE. I’ve never seen a picture or a video that did it justice. It must be seen in person. And it looks great on so many different straps, bands, and bracelets.

[@scotdoc]

I agree. I own both & selling Datejust 41

[@Czeron01]

I saw the aqua Terra in person yesterday for the first time. Pictures and videos do not do this watch justice. It looked and felt increasingly, very high quality watch indeed.

[@michaelbuselli336]

@@scotdoc Why sell the datejust? its a rolex and a must own classic. Keep both

[@scottdimeler3636]

Just bought a brand new Aqua Terra with silver dial. Got 20 percent off retail at an Omega Boutique. Love this watch.

[@Czeron01]

@@scottdimeler3636 Congratulations! A very fine piece indeed. Terrific discount as well.

[@sleepingbanshee_]

that omega aqua terra grey blue dial looks so much better in person than in pictures and videos.

[@Mohammedalyafeimusic]

I have noticed something: Rolex’s fans are always talking in one style like “it’s Rolex” “Rolex is better” “Rolex has higher resale value” but OMEGA’s fans are talking facts and figures like “15,000 Gauss” “silicon hairspring” “METAS” “bidirectional rotor” etc. This shows that Rolex is not OMEGA and we have to appreciate both philosophy. OMEGA has super great history that unfortunately we didn’t live (50’s and 60’s) but it’s coming back. it took the company 20 years to standup after Quartz crisis. Rolex was so lucky to rely on its financial privilege/strength during the Quartz crisis “as Charity” to take the pole position from OMEGA. For me, I’ll be proud to wear a watch that fought for it’s principles throughout challenges, keep educating its customers about watch industry and provides more options to make each watch closer to the customer’s personality and taste. Devaluing any brands means you are still not up to the right level to compare or criticise their products. As I’m a big fan of 8900 movement, OMEGA wins for me. Thank you guys.

[@Mohammedalyafeimusic]

Dapdoi Ardon heeeey, Saying Rolex is the king is a Fact for you as well.. so stop buttbleeding of facts 😂 & try it next time prestigiously

[@bensonchang1318]

Hmmm for me both brands produce great watches, I have watches from Audemars Piguet Royal Oak to Rolex Daytona, GMT BLNR, Omega Seamaster 300m 2018, quite a few Seikos, Invicta, and Casios. I love them all equally, maybe one more than the others but thats based on the reason why I got to purchase it. But in terms of tangible qualities I love them all equally, like I would be as happy to wear my Casio as I would my Rolex (depending on situation of course, I won't wear my Rolex to do handy work like I won't wear my Casio to a formal dinner) if I didn't feel I would be happy wearing it on a normal day walking around the city, it would not be in my watch box. I think in terms of Rolex and omega both brands deserve respect, but it's almost inevitable that you have a preference for one brand and that's fine, just don't beat down other brands (unless it's a fake, those don't deserve any humane treatment) The sole reason I love my omega seamaster 300m (2018) is only because it was a birthday present signifying my 21st birthday. The AP and Daytona, although, like the omega, I didn't buy with my own money, has less sentimental meaning attached to those two amazing watches. I only came to possession because I was either allowed to use it (so I don't actually own it) or I was gifted second hand from my dad because he wasn't interested.

[@mikelangelo3997]

Completely agreed on what you're saying...

[@drK2811]

Amen to that. 🙏

[@johncheng9958]

Thanks for your education. Inspirational

[@richarddavis7548]

Just purchased the Aqua Terra with the blue dial - passed on the Rolex. I guess that answers the question for me!

[@UnyieldingHierophant]

You and I are one and the same! Love my Aqua Terra. And I know that with my Omega, it’s not just another number like Rolex, yuck.

[@SG-he4cy]

I bought Omega seamaster Blue. Eyeing on Aqua terra too. Screw Rolex. My dad has them i know how tough is it to get them.

[@alfredgarcia6608]

Smart buy.

[@austinzizzi1142]

About to trade my oyster perpetual in for an aqua terra skyfall

[@korswe]

Good choice. I got the Aqua Terra, too.

[@LemtemPoktui]

When I was getting my first luxury watch I was debating between these exact two watches. In the end I went for the 8900 AT simply because it's a better watch. The fit and finish, features and the overall history of Omega is just more interesting to me.

[@GhostRider659]

2:13 that synchronized time on both watches is very satisfying.

[@scottlauren3145]

I would do questionable things for that Omega.

[@goblinoverlord9381]

Same

[@peepeepoopoo-lz7vj]

questionable would be an understatement.

[@joeshaves2020]

Gay as hell is here

[@tinton08568]

@@joeshaves2020 Im not gay but a Omega is a Omega

[@mb3318]

I would too. I would continue working as an overworked, frustrated, and sleep-deprived IT admin for about two weeks to earn the money to buy that watch. Oh wait...

[@qadrik]

To be fair, the Omega is a “better” watch with its superior movement. And it’s a “better value” with its price point. The issue is that the Aqua Terra as a design does not look like it will age well, where as the Rolex has a timeles quality to it. The Aqua Terra would be a much more intriguing alternative to the DateJust IF the design was a LOT more simpler.

[@2deep5u]

This is my problem with Omega. They can't design cases and dials that won't look silly 10 years from now on, even though their movements are more than impressive enough to rival Rolex.

[@heminder]

That's a matter of perspective. Rolex already looks like an old man's watch, but the Omega looks fresh. In a decade the Rollie may well be an antique sought after by cork-sniffers on a pension.

[@qadrik]

They did a video where they compared the Omega Globemaster to a Rolex. Now that Globemaster - in my opinion - more than holds its own in competition to the Rolex. Classically styled with an outstanding movement.

[@blankspace5614]

Not sure if it's a better value than a Rolex. Of course it's quite a bit cheaper but it also will lose a lot of value the second you leave your local jeweler.

[@zzeuss87]

@@qadrik Love that piece. Classic style. It will always look relevant. The bezel predates the DJ too. No resale, but who cares? It's a keeper.

[@tiempoconedd5634]

After 2 years and 5 months still enjoying this episode!!

[@DougieFresh13]

The Omega in question is a fine piece imo. This was my gut reaction and I am a sucker for an exhibition back...

[@jigd0471]

What a lume shot ! Just beautiful , Bravo for the Omega!

[@smr32061]

The Omega is Seamaster is a beautiful watch. I would buy it despite the fact I own a Datejust 41.

Perhaps Omega's finish is too rich when you consider it a daily casual watch and compare it to DateJust. However, this Omega is a Seamaster, and despite these two being similar in design at first glance, the "Sea" here is crucial. Then the colors and all finishes make it, in my opinion, one of the most beautiful watches for a passionate sailor and yacht owner. My point is, these are two different kind of watches. If you want to compare Omega to Rolex's DateJust, do it with Globemaster :)

[@WatchGeek]

Omega ON A BRACELET, YES, the rubber strap doesn't do it for me

[@Mannykeri]

Put it on an Omega Nato.

[@sp3c0ps]

@@Mannykeri Natos look cheap af.

[@AndreUtrecht]

​@@sp3c0ps Right it has to look expensive? A Nato Strap is there for the practicality. And the colour scheme gives it its standing, not its price tag. And there is a quality difference in Nato Straps: thickness, length, metal parts that are brushed or shiny. And it can get wet, just like a rubber strap. The Omega Seamaster is there to be used in the water. Don't use it as a dress watch. All watches that have an ATM of 100 or more are for in the water. In my philosophy: don't wear these as dress watches. It is ridiculous. And also if you are not a diver, don't get a diver watch with a bezel you'll never use. It is all far from being stylish. The same goes for having a watch with a Tachymeter. If you are not a driver, and aren't going to measure the speed of a car with it, don't have a watch with a Tachymeter. It is like wearing glasses with just plain glass in it to look good. You'll look ridiculous in my book. You don't look better with the most expensive watch or a watch with the most complications. It is about quality, finish, movement and what you will use the watch for, how it'll fit your personal needs when wearing it. Plus you never buy a watch based on its strap. It is about the small clock itself, the strap you can always exchange with other straps, to make it fit your style. The strap is secondary when buying a small clock.

[@sp3c0ps]

@@AndreUtrecht so in your opinion the seamaster aquaterra is not a dress watch??? You stupid lol

[@sp3c0ps]

Ofc you buy the watch for the strap you dont put a steel strap from like a rolex or this one on like a globemaster even tho i dont like the globemaster strap thats also the only reason i wont buy a globemaster because i dont like these steel straps.

[@2000bhoy]

I finally got mine in July for my 60th birthday. Exactly the one in the video. Omega of course. I am a happy bunny!

[@PeO.]

I like both, but my choice would be Omega, more sporty and casual, and doesn´t have the magnification

[@alvarortega2]

Just went for the Omega today... couldn't resist. So much more for the money ...

[@grumpyoldman2380]

That Omega is absolutely beautiful. The complexity seems natural and unobtrusive and this is a watch that will get noticed on a wrist. It just stands out. The issue Rolex has today is that there too many Rolex homages and this Rolex is just white noise. Plain, bland and uninspired. Also, with a lower price point, I can see this Omega giving Rolex a serious headache.

[@chasem3549]

My issue with omega right now is the resale value. Bland Rolexes appreciate 🤷‍♂️

[@Posavac90]

@@chasem3549 Enthusiasts don't care about resale value.

[@TurnRiver]

@@chasem3549 Omegas hold pretty close to their discounted retail value, which is good enough for me in the event I need to liquidate. Watches that double as an investment class feel more like jewelry than a watch. I also feel that paying well over retail for a used Rolex is not a good investment either. Buying used or preowned changes how I connect with the objects. Buying new from an AD on the other hand is another story.

[@SuperWhofan1]

Thanks for posting this video. Great content. This Aqua Terra is my favorite variant and I feel to be the best summer watch available. The white dial Aqua Terra with bracelet could be the better all rounder.

[@turhanapdula6046]

Hello, I want to ask question? I have a tissot le locle with pvd rose gold, and watch has scratches. How can restore the corpus of watch?

[@bobcortez4427]

I think Rolex's appeal comes from being timeless. Rolex is like Harley-Davidson, to someone who does not know watches, you could be wearing a model from 1975 or 2018, they wouldn't know the difference, just that it is a Rolex. That appeal carries real value. Porsche 911's are another example, they may evolve over the years but regardless of the model, you know it's a 911. WIth that said, as an owner of both Rolex and Omega (among others), the modern Omega's are superior watches.

[@rumporridge1]

Bob Cortez I have both as well. The word “superior” is a bit strong. Excellent build quality yes. Superior to Rolex quality and tank like movement; not so sure.

[@WyreForestBiker]

LOL .." Rolex is like Harley-Davidson " !! I know what your getting at but the analogy is seriously flawed !! Rolex is about quality and performance , I'm afraid HD has neither .

[@arbogash1852]

Bob Cortez I just want to point out that Harley Davidson is on the verge of possibly going out of business.

[@garethbennett3780]

I prefer the Omega but come on now, conparing Rolex to Harley Davidson is just insulting. Rolex make extremely high quality watches in their own right. I would say its more akin to something like mercedes to Bmw

[@Peter-tc3ep]

Column Wheel I also own both a Rolex, Submariner/skydweller and omega, seamaster 300m, and agree both are great watches. But I will say the omega movement is a half step better only because I travel a bunch and the Rolex drives me up the wall with not having antimagnetic protection. Before buying the omega I just assumed a regular trip to my AD to get your watch demagnetized was normal, now I find it fatiguing. Otherwise the Rolex is extremely well made like the omega. So my omega has become my travel watch and more of my daily wearer. Which leaves me to possibly trading in my Anniversary Submariner for an aquanaut. But I still love my skydweller it’s a bit more of a dress watch, just strange that only a couple a Rolex watches get magnetic protection.

[@walkerb1734]

I dont have a dog in this fight. I own both Rolex and Omega and love them both. This whole discussion is equivalent to having a blond supermodel in bed on your left, and a brunette supermodel in bed on your right. Which is better? I’ll take ‘em both!

[@billt1954]

Brian B. HA HA! love your analogy. Reading these posts, i think us guys are just as passionate about our watches as we are about sex!

[@javierbacaicoa]

Finally someone with good reasoning. Both great watches, wich one is better? who cares, at the end of the day some people are happier with a toy watch than some with a Patek.

[@charliebrown2359]

And for those of us who like redheads, variety is the spice of life.

[@omarsaletovicprins9632]

Nah, I’ll have the blonde.

[@udin737]

I love to have more. Lmao

[@eiwlhunter]

By searching around for my first luxury watch under over many months, I finally went for Omega Aqua Terra Good Planet. Love it every minute.

[@BlackAnvil47]

Very good review, I was looking to purchase a Rolex today, but I've now consider adding Omega to the research

[@scott650]

There are many variations of the AT and some are much less "fussy" than the one shown here. I have the version with the white/silver dial w/orange second hand and brown leather strap. It provides a classic look with a modern spin and I feel the aesthetic will hold up over the years. Through much effort, I also obtained the black rubber strap w/orange stiching and the metal inserts. This provides the option of much more sporty look, when desired.

[@MrJazzflute]

That Aqua Terra is absolutely gorgeous , WOW

[@lifesanabyss2727]

I absolutely love this colour palette of the aqua terra, it’s striking and different

[@astoria1996]

3:53 God that was beautiful. Especially with that Lume! That line suited perfectly with that effect. God like production. You guys are truly remarkable!

[@thewheelieguy]

Yes, I had never seen the variation of deeper and shallow engraved lines on the dial before.

[@costasmandylor1565]

You should do a review of the Seiko Marinemaster 300, an iconic diver's watch. Would love to hear your take on it.

[@hugohernandez3651]

No reason to choose for me. I have both brands in my collection and love them equally.

[@salvadorcano4494]

Was considering getting a Rolex explorer 1, but after watching this I will definitely get the aqua terra. Gorgeous piece..

[@freedomvan2970]

These macro shots are amazing. Great video!! 👍

[@77cjam]

I'd personally prefer the omega over the Rolex on so many levels. But like every single watch bought from Rolex to Orient, Omega to Casio, it's all about your own personal choice. Great video as always

[@sinatralala]

Exactly. Better is relative.

[@RJ-xh4xb]

Right! Even for some of us Tag Heuer fans who always get discriminated against by watch snobs. :-/

[@alfonsodelosreyes119]

The only channel that doesn't show watches on the wrist and no one complaining in the comments section. Beautiful shots as always!

[@buddyrupp6235]

Omega has a free sprung balance! Nice. The balance set-up is similar to Rolex.

[@zigatelban4392]

i love the camera work, this is some quality content :)

[@4syth]

I prefer Omega to Rolex, I own a few Omega’s but not a Rolex. In this particular comparison I would chose the Rolex, it’s just stunning.

[@terr256]

I've seen this Aqua Terra in person and I personally would buy this over the Rolex especially with the blue dial

[@anparsons70]

Exactly why I bought one this afternoon, Blue face with Steel Bracelet.

[@mdaydj]

Yep me too returned a brand new Datejust 41 and went AT with blue dial it's bloody stunning

[@omegawatchfan]

The 8900 Aqua Terra and the 8500 before it are outstanding values. I've compared them directly and found the 8900 to have the edge in comfort while the 8500's longer lugs are more beautiful. When compared to DJ, it is amazing how much you get for your money with the AT.

[@petepalmere210]

Informative and professionally done video. The Omega with bracelet (though I do like that integrated rubber band look) will be my second Seamaster and it will become my goto everyday watch...it is just a beautiful time piece!

[@w.m.aslam-author]

Omega are my preferred watch brand, and although Rolex watches are finely engineered they lack character and innovative design. Omega have made great progress over the last decade and have become as desirable as any Rolex watch, and the Aqua Terra is my personal favourite. I have to agree that Omega went off on a 'creative' tangent and need to stick to a limited number of designs, just like Rolex, this will help them gain new followers and retain their current buyers.

[@joytekb]

Rolex without brand name look like...well Seiko

[@mzamroni]

Omega should give option of metal rear panel. It will make the watch thinner rather than current sapphire back.

[@arianucsb]

Just want to say .... your videos are the most well thought out and well stated on the entire web. Bravo

[@stritlit]

The problem is that you guys chose literally THE WORST aqua terra model. One a steel bracelet it's minimalist and is definitely a great purchase. The blue strap just puts people off.

[@S1000RR11]

The omega is just a superb watch and the aqua terra is so versatile, Rolex bore me.

[@foesfly3047]

Interesting history lesson and comparison. Although I own 5 Rolex models, they are not as accurate as the Pierce Brosnan era Omega Seamaster or the 2 Breitlings in my collection of Automatics. I also really dislike the Rolex cyclops. If a crystal ever requires replacement, I'll prefer a replacement sans cyclops. It's unnecessary and if compromises several indexes and degrees of hand sweep. I like a lot about this new Omega but I am personally unwilling to accept a rubber strap on any watch costing over $4k. Thanks for your excellent presentation.

[@michaelkaye4998]

I’ve enjoyed these videos very much. I have drooled over some spectacular watches but without any thought of owning. However, this Omega will be mine in the not too distant future! I have an omega diver and this would be a nice complement. Thanks

[@lonewolftrader1]

It's funny that these Rolex fanboys keep talking about brand recognition and street cred to flex and not actually acknowledging the watch comparison. Forgetting how to appreciate the art of watchmaking and innovation but only cares about the fact it's a "Rolex"

[@AAAAATTTTTIIIIIFFFFF]

Richie D i cannot agree more. Thats exactly what i ve been saying. Its like people who dont know a thing about football and you ask them for their favourite player and they say ronaldo .

[@danielplainview4778]

That’s a poor analogy. I love horology and spend a large amount of my free time researching it and learning about it. I recently made a decision between these two watches and chose Rolex. Why? Because the Rolex felt more special, made me feel better and it was to celebrate a professional achievement in my life. This fairy tale concept of “the art of watch making” guiding every buying decision is a fabrication and the real world isn’t blind to brands and marketing. Obviously the brands appeal and prestige factors into even a lot of “watch geeks” decisions. If it didn’t you could go out and buy a far better “bang for the buck” then that omega. If that exact omega with the exact same specs and movement said “Joes Watch Company” and was made in Taiwan then all the omega fan boys would hate on it. Welcome to the world of luxury goods these are not “rational decisions” and it is not a “rational market”.

[@minerdigger]

Lol you can't afford Rolex. Go enjoy your Invicta pro diver bro lmaooooo.

[@thenewexeptor]

@@danielplainview4778 Completely agree on that. The idea of "having the same or even better quality than Rolex for less money" is broken by the sole fact that we are talking objects whose functionalities can be quite well replicated by a much, much cheaper ones. I myself thought of buying a much more prestigious (same reason as yours) watch and I went to a local Rolex and Omega shops proudly wearing my Seiko SARX035 on my hand. I've spoke with the people in the shops and that were a typical luxury items sellers yet they appreciated my watch and we've even compared it with some pieces. At the end I was quite enthusiastic about my experience but what one of the dealers told me was so grounding - "yes you have a good watch and yes it might on some levels (I guess he told me that just to be polite) be compared, but what Rolex will give you as side effects cannot be replicated that easily". So as long something is adding a real value to your life - having more confidence, being proud of yourself and so on, then it justified every penny. If it is Rolex then OK, if it is Omega - not bad at all, if you are lucky and it is a Patek well ... :) ... and even if it has to be Casio - fine as long as you feel good. In the times where your phone (even a $100 piece) can give you so much more functions than any watch out there I personally appreciate it every time I see a hand with this small old fashioned item on it.

[@redcapitalist]

@@danielplainview4778 You're a professional moron. Period. Rolex produces 1 million watches a year - that means you're just one of a million new suckers PER YEAR. The watch costs less than $400 ex-factory - whatever excess you paid for it goes to Roger Federer, greasy luxury store salesmen and Rolex executives. The Rolex movement is no better nor more accurate than an ETA. You know ZILCH about watches

[@bachaabdou4433]

This Omega is a beauty!

[@robertsullivan4773]

Had my eye on the omega for about a month now. Been thinking of one with the Sedna gold pm a rubber strap. Have to see how the New Year goes.

[@bolotyuk]

Can you compare the accuracy of watches? For example, run simultaneously with the electronic timer for 48 hours..

[@jackserious3282]

That white datejust is so beautiful! Its so clean and classy.

[@trevbarlow9719]

Isn't the recent Omega Globemaster more of a contender to the DJ?

[@ominous-omnipresent-they]

That Omega is almost perfect in its presentation. It would literally be my second choice below the GS Skyflake.

[@Ceaze87]

I love this video! Great content!

[@SoCalWatchReviews]

The Omega is an awesome watch, but the Rolex simple design is hard to beat!

[@alphaomega7367]

Rolex is for posers that know , jack shit about, high horological watches, Patek, Lange, JLC, ....enough said

[@rubenve79]

@@alphaomega7367 Calm down dude

[@RJ-xh4xb]

@@alphaomega7367 you sound like a bitter, sour graping jealous idiot. If you do not own a rolex, relax, Omega is good too.

[@SavageKillaBees]

I have both watches and the Rolex is pretty boring and not as well made man.

[@SoCalWatchReviews]

@@SavageKillaBees thanks for letting us know 👍🏼

[@chivasteele]

I once had a Rolex and almost everyone who saw it became an instant watch expert and asked me "is it a real one" on a daily basis. Replaced it with a used Speedmaster and the experts left me alone.

[@SENGVIN]

Yep that's how it is

[@Thelifeofswans]

Great review, Omega are certainly holding rheir own in the current competative landscape. I would be interested to see you review the IWC Portuguese against Breitling latest Navitimer.

[@RGMGDA]

Yep 👍 Great and Informative video 😊 Respect ✊

[@planetdee3587]

I think one of the biggest issues is no matter how you slice it, the consumers who want a Rolex (specifically a DJ) want that simple look. And the more Omega tries to look "better" the more it strays from the Datejust consumer base. So it is not about which company does it better, it is about which company gives the consumer what they want. Rolex seems to cater to older people and people who want to be perceived as older and established.

[@drfdwf392]

1:35 DID THE SECONDS HAND JUST BECOME A CYCLOPS? WHAT THE...

[@davidpippin3460]

saw that too, WTH?

[@silvershadowjsh]

The first time I saw an Aqua Terra small seconds I was absolutely blown away by its quality. It’s ridiculous. Such a superbly beautiful watch. I’ve owned a 300M for a while and that too is just staggering. No watch I‘be tried on (around a similar price point) have even comes close. Only criticism and by goodness is an extreme criticism and it also applies more to the AT than the 300M, but it’s quite a thick watch. I like chunky watches, but it doesn’t suit. Doesn’t matter though.

[@samwasher4393]

Review the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 34mm blue dial

[@morimo11]

I’d say the benefit of the Omega, aesthetics aside, is availability and price including huge discounts on the grey market and moderate discounts at dealers. Rolex, at least presently, has far better value retention and resale value. Even grey market prices for stainless models is still at or above retail and has been for a while. If this doesn’t matter to you, get the Omega.

[@kowalski2015]

exactly, who can't get a rolex is just grudging

[@asura2545]

I actually think the oyster perpetual is the perfect rolex dresswatch while the omega is a great travel piece (don’t like the date window of the datejust)

[@mclaren855]

Thank you! Oyster perpetual is my favorite rolex.

[@matthewdavis8199]

The quick hour jumping feature of the Omega would be very handy for travel.

[@MrMarantzman]

That OMEGA at the end of the video was ultra stunning.....

[@derekbrettell8121]

I considered both watches and went for the Omega AT in Black with bracelet. It really is a great watch with a fantastic movement! I also own a Speedmaster and have my name down for a Rolex GMT Batman so don't say I'm a Rolex hater lol. I appreciate both brands but you get a lot of watch for your money with Omega so it's hard to see past them as a brand. I would recommend the AT over the Datejust and put the change towards something better unless you want a Rolex for the sake of having a Rolex

[@toshanilov7250]

dude, just by watching your video you sold me that omega, even tho I am a Rolex fan with 2 Rolex time pieces.

[@RickyRicon2023]

which one did you buy tosha nilov? same dial color?

[@johnpinner1]

I have both Rolex and Omega they are great watches

[@taotoo2]

What happens to the lume on the second hand @1:38?

[@connork195]

Although I strongly respect omega, I have a problem with some of the details they decide to put into their watches. The first being, I just think the crown on most omegas stick out of the case and make too much of a statement. If they are trying to compete with the Rolex, I think they should scale back the crown size. The other gripe I’ve always had with omega is their bracelet and strap designs. Taking this watch as an example, I think everything about the watch is beautiful, except for the crown and the strap. I personally think this watch would flow a lot better with a dark grey leather strap, one that nearly matches the dial, or is a tad bit darker. Match that with a blue stitching to match the hands and hour makers, and I think the Rolex has some even more serious competition. Keep in mind this is just my personal opinion.

[@veetour]

I've been conditioned to salivate when I see this channel has posted a new video.

[@saltmunc]

only problem of the omega (and all co-axial movement watches) is the thickness relative to rolex.. rolex is always easier to wear

[@Gnomosfortheoffice]

saltmunc exactly. Same with Grand Seiko

[@Arcord10]

Actually the Aquaterra is pretty thin watch, feels very good on the wrist (maybe too much, I prefer thicker watchers)

[@jeanferret9497]

And the frightening Co-Axial servicing costs.

[@Gnomosfortheoffice]

Jean Ferret True, but don’t Co-Axial movements have longer service intervals?

[@petestowne]

@@jeanferret9497 what frightening costs?

[@ShepProudfoot]

The vid i was hoping for. This Omega Model is a dream

[@Dividenden_Hai]

After we discussed that, is mvmt better then Omega?

[@anon1.9.8.7.6]

Happy to say I'm just two years away from having enough money to buy my first "real" watch (a Speedmaster), Never say I could never afford that, just start saving

[@bencritchley2005]

And did you get it?!

[@anon1.9.8.7.6]

@@bencritchley2005 I did! I went for the Tudor black bay Harrods edition though, absolutely love it!

[@RJ-xh4xb]

@@anon1.9.8.7.6 but I thought you were getting the speedmaster?

[@TheBandit13]

I've handled and plan to purchase the AT, grey dial on the bracelet, which would have been a better comparison, IMHO. Not to mention, that grey dial on steel looks awesome! The Omega AT is a better watch with better tech. Period.Whether or not you like it, well that's a different story.. (I do) & Don't get me wrong I do like many Rokex models. I've just never been able to get over that Mickey Mouse looking hour hand. Rolex are simply the best marketers, hands down. Period. Just ask 98% of Rolex wearers what movement is in their watch. They will probably say "it's an automatic". SMFH🤔 Sometimes, perception is reality. Great video as always, btw.

[@casualsuede]

I like the design of the omega as it has more flair, but in the long run, I think the classic design of the datejust will age better. However, the sweep of the rolex seems more smooth than that of the aqua terra. For full disclosure, I own a datejust and an omega (speedmaster, not the aqua terra).

[@mynameistechno]

How come the seconds are running so different on multiple shots? At one time there are even, cut, uneven. @6:00 min. and onwards

[@SharapovaFan]

If you removed the 5 pointed crown, the "Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust" and replaced it with a "Seiko 5", most would probably would never even consider it. Brand aside, the Omega is simply the more handsome watch. Even the macro shots show it punches well above its price point.

[@craigwinter9539]

Not with that wonky date wheel when shown with the 22. I'm always amazed at just how many flaws these videos show up.

[@Wealthy-Spirit]

Can you please show some more expensive and rear ones, like MB&F, Bovet etc .

[@gpearce11]

As someone who likes to have a date, but can’t fully articulate exactly how much I hate Rolex’s cyclops date, the Omega wins for me right there. I happen to prefer the Aqua Terra over the Datejust in every other way as well, but that, and the display case back, are the main ones. I also like the new 6 o’clock date placement Omega has been utilising lately. I find the model of Aqua Terra shown here to be an interesting choice. I personally would go for the more understated black, white, or blue dials on the excellent bracelet, which are definitely a more direct competitor to the simplicity of the Datejust. This grey/blue dial on rubber, of all things, is just perfect for the kind of person who looks at a Rolex and immediately think is just SO BORING (I’m not one of those people, but I can definitely see where they’re coming from). I also love that Omega made a matching grey/blue version of the new 300m Diver, for weekends. That’s an awesome two watch collection right there.

[@danijayyy1]

This past summer, I narrowed my search for a new watch down to a Datejust 41 and the previous generation of the Aqua Terra, which measured at 41.5 - both in a black dial. I chose the Aqua Terra and am still as in love with it as I was the day I brought it home. With that said, though, I'll probably still head back to the AD for that Datejust one of these years. Two fabulous timepieces.

[@Sticky1254]

even if someone creates a 10000x better automatic movement than what's in the rolex, people will still buy rolex because it says rolex sadly.

[@udin737]

Look at what Seiko achieves with spring drive tech. But I like the name Omega better. 😁

[@brentgilbert805]

@archie baldwin lol

[@alphaomega7367]

Agreed. Rolex is for posers that know , jack shit about, high horological watches, Patek, Lange, JLC, ....enough said

[@meetseth3]

@@alphaomega7367 you're just mad you can't afford a Rolex

[@RJ-xh4xb]

@@meetseth3 i can afford a Rolex, but I am mad I can't get one from an authorized dealer. Gray market scalpers is not an option for me because there are lots of fakes out there....yeah, even from Chrono24 and other "reputable" dealers...i will stick with an authorized dealer any day, so the registration will be under my name, not some random guy I do not know...but Rolex is making it so difficult to buy one...

[@sinjon]

I can’t decide which color of the AT I want. I’m not a huge fan of that rubber strap so that’d have to go if I get the blue one. The movement in these is gorgeous. Glad it has an exhibition window

[@Pegasusbiketraining]

Love the Rolex and have one, I have an omega speedmaster and Rolex is hands down more comfy I love it

[@Ced_GT]

Just love the simplicity of Rolex. Omega needs to keep it simple and stop trying so hard!!

[@alphaomega7367]

Rolex is for posers that know , jack shit about, high horological watches, Patek, Lange, JLC, ....enough said

[@VegasMilgauss]

I've bought you a Rolex honey vs I've bought you an omega honey.... No contest 👑

[@alexbarcovsky4319]

Rolex - mainstream/Omega - honey knows her stuff

[@freedomvan2970]

Synchronized the examples before the review... that is a PRO move!!

[@intellips]

Currently looking to buying an aqua terra with a green or grey dial. Such beautiful watches

[@ednammansfield8553]

These are both great watches and I would love to be able to afford either one but in reality will never be able to. If I did have that amount to spend on a watch I would probably be tempted to go for the Rolex as this particular watch in the video is a timeless classic and Rolex have always kept their design simple and is therefore more versatile. This Omega also is a stunning looking watch and I like the design but is it better than the Rolex?, I really wouldn't know. Great video on these two watches.

[@HybrisParExcellence]

The problem with watches which are cheaper and better than Rolex watches is that they are not Rolexes.

[@MultiAlliot]

and thats not a bad thing

[@HybrisParExcellence]

Usama Manzoor no, not at all. I just think that a lot of people choose the crown over potentially better alternatives.

[@JS97278]

You clearly know nothing about horology lol

[@ernestokling]

Better is questionable.

[@Eeeeeric416]

If you only care about the name so you can show off to other people, that's fine. Rolex nothing special though, especially today. They're $6000+ watches that offer the quality of a $1500 watch. Their finishing is meh. Their build quality is good. Their movements are decent. That's all they have going for them.

[@smkader]

Whats going on with the second hand at 1:39 as it sweeps over the minute hand????

[@scottlalonde2878]

Another awesome video, thank you watchfinder.

[@olegariomartinez6807]

I like the simplicity of the datejust and in fact it is on my radar. The omega just seems a bit to busy for my taste.

[@sbsb4995]

Omega wins.

[@Wvk5zc]

Are the hands on Omega heated blue?