Babe, wake up! The Queen has returned! And she's picking water lilies for the River daughter!
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
🏵🌼🏵
@colindunnigan86216 ай бұрын
As I've gotten older, I've come to appreciate Goldberry (and Tom) more. "Have peace now until the morning! Heed no nightly noises! For nothing passes door and window here, save moonlight and starlight and the wind off the hill-top."
@Enerdhil6 ай бұрын
I am always struck by how well Tolkien writes dialogue for female characters.
@saeedshahbazian98896 ай бұрын
@@EnerdhilI'm always impressed by how well he writes everything 😁
@expred6 ай бұрын
Yeah, I'd love to visit Tom's place. At the edge of adventure, a cozy and psychedelic place of comfort. And banger ass tracks to sing-along-to. Sip some magical singing water before embracing on more adventures involving evil trinkets, wraiths and whatnot. It's such a breath of comfort, yet in a mystical way. My headcanon is that Merry and the Pippin picked up some psychedelic mushrooms by accident from the Old forest, explaining some of these events and Tom is just a normal dude singing a lot. Okay I'm just joking around here. Maybe... Anyway, I always used to skip it, now I love reading these passages. So on the same boat as you :) edit: i realize now your comment was more about Goldberry as is the video; I just woke up and not fully cognizant yet, sorry. Anyway, I also love Goldberry's mystical aura and near-annoying ambiguity about Tom. "He is, as you have seen him." Okay, thanks for the info :D
@Makkaru1126 ай бұрын
@@Enerdhil notice how treebeard/Fangorn speaks several lines of Tom. Gandalf does too. In the movies.
@Makkaru1126 ай бұрын
@@expred hundreds have said that skipping Tom and the song and poems and or the description of a tree and a leaf or something on the side of the road don’t get Tolkien. As it’s all important. Heck. Even faramir said to Frodo he wouldn’t take the ring even if he saw it on the side of the road somewhere.
@TolkienLorePodcast6 ай бұрын
Whoa, the parallels with Galadriel are eerie. Can’t believe I never noticed that before!
@flamingosedai18206 ай бұрын
lmao. Tolkien:"Don't think about Tom too much. It's not important." Fandom: " Challenge accepted."
@sirwilliam41285 ай бұрын
😂🤣
@pennyc85725 ай бұрын
I know, right?! And am I the sole fan who was glad Peter Jackson DIDN’T fool with adding the layer of Tom, et al, to the movie? That sees the Tom interlude into the rest of the narrative in LOTR as totally superfluous? I remember reading LOTR as a kid and when coming to the Bombadil/Goldberry part, thinking, “Um…why?!”. 😂
@jpbjoel6 ай бұрын
With Goldberry and Tom, I’ve often thought of them as demonstrating in their marriage the interaction between Nature and Mankind if Mankind had not Fallen. The elves had not fallen as a race (they had as individuals) and Nature entwined with them, and together, places of beauty and solace were created. Goldberry and Tom showed what the interplay of unfallen Mankind and Nature would be like. More rustic, closer to the beating heart of the Earth, less etherial and more sensual than the elves, rustic and more fun, but no less wonderful. The Eruhini are of Arda, but fallen Man is distanced from it. G&T give a glimpse of what life in Arda would be like for unfallen men. I haven’t pondered on this in some time, but it’s how G+T make the most sense to me. That’s the best thing about your videos for me, Lexi. Even when real life is crazy for months on end, you create a moment to allow me to revisit Tolkien’s work - and that allows me the space to think about different, simpler, but in many ways deeper things.
@Duiker366 ай бұрын
I really like how you've phrased this, and I pretty much agree.
@izzycurer12606 ай бұрын
Sounds kind of like Enkidu and Shamhat in the epic of Gilgamesh.
@rikk3195 ай бұрын
How can you fall as a race and still have individual free will?
@akseiya4 ай бұрын
@@rikk319 How can you have individual free will but somehow not fall as a race?
@rikk3194 ай бұрын
@@akseiya If you're judged on your individual choices, your race has nothing to do with it.
@andrayellowpenguin6 ай бұрын
I always thought Goldbery very interesting and could never understand why almost nobody talks about her, when everyone is wondering about Bombadil. So happy to see this video! ❤
@eluthiccgol47156 ай бұрын
Oooh. Really like the idea of Goldberry being a Maia of Ulmo.
@paulbrickler6 ай бұрын
I think she most likely was, a lower-level one, a river-sprite Maia in the company or service of Uinen.
@Enerdhil6 ай бұрын
I like that concept too.
@c.antoniojohnson71146 ай бұрын
I believe she's a river sprite, lower level.
@johnscanlon84676 ай бұрын
I think it comes close to the answer, but don't forget she's the river-woman's _daughter_, not the river-woman herself. As far as we know from the Silmarillion, none of the Ainur have offspring among themselves, but there is a precedent for one reproducing with an Elf (Melian the Maia and Elwë/Thingol, parents of Luthien). So my hypothesis is that a Maia of Ulmo (embodiment or guardian of the Withywindle, or possibly Baranduin) was involved with a non-famous elf in the distant past, and Goldberry is the result. It's simplest to assume an elven father who departed west due to physical death or ennui, because in Tolkien's world a human/maiar couple wouldn't happen. (In GRRM's world, her father would of course be Bombadil himself.)
@Enerdhil6 ай бұрын
@@johnscanlon8467 Goldberry a child of Ulmo?! 😱 It would explain why he isn't married, though.😅
@michaelogrady2326 ай бұрын
"And her heart was beating!" A very interesting observation.
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
Rules out barrow-wight, I should hope 🤣 💗
@michaelogrady2326 ай бұрын
@GirlNextGondor It implies perhaps there were other similar beings that did not have beating hearts, that were purely spiritual, or illusory. From the time I first read it as a much younger man it always seemed a strange way to describe a corporeal being. To be sure, Tolkien did not just add the line as filler.
@Enerdhil6 ай бұрын
@@GirlNextGondor Yes. Goldberry has white arms, not wight arms.
@Requiemslove6 ай бұрын
I always read it as a double meaning, in that first he was surprised at Goldberry being corporeal, maybe she'd been taunting him and tricking him for a considerable time? And he didn't "think" she was, but some incorporeal spirit playing tricks on him. But also, and more immediate, the quite obvious boy meets girl meets boy scenario. "And her heart was a beating". I wouldn't be surprised if her reprise was "and his feet were a floundering"
@pwmiles566 ай бұрын
@@Requiemslove She's actually a semi-transparent river-nymph, of a kind known to biology, being larvae of insects such as mayflies, damselflies and dragonflies.
@ninasurr39026 ай бұрын
I always thought she had a touch of Persephone - she appears at the cusp of summer and fall, and the perils the hobbits face are natural and alive before they meet the Bombadils (Old Man Willow) and dead and supernatural after (the barrow wights).
@crhu3196 ай бұрын
I would love Overly Sarcastic Productions take on that! They did wonderful deconstructions of Persephone
@Scrub_Jake5 ай бұрын
Man I love being in the time I’m in… my father was an arguably bigger Tolkien fan than anyone I’ve ever met, read everything, watched everything, etc… but he never really got to experience such philosophy on the topics as I get from these kinds of videos. Thank you young lady, every year my respect for Tolkien and his effect on the modern world grows.
@retbookers6 ай бұрын
I love Tolkien's ethereal description of Lady Goldberry. The man had a way with words.
@lotsofspots6 ай бұрын
When you said "wights' barrow" I heard it as "white sparrow" and was momentarily confused. This has been your help-with-the-algorithm interaction for today!
@AmatureAstronomer5 ай бұрын
Tom? "Old Tom Bombadil is a merry fellow, Bright blue his jacket is, and his boots are yellow. None has ever caught him yet, for Tom, he is the Master: His songs are stronger songs, and his feet are faster." Goldberry is Tom's wife.
@MatejCadil6 ай бұрын
I love seeing my illustration used in the video! 😁 Great video as always, I love especially the comparison of Goldberry with Galadriel. It was always obvious that there was a similarity, but the number of parallels in the narrative is striking. And at the same time the differences are even more interesting. Goldberry representing the seasonal changes in natural landscape, whereas Lothlórien is so enchanted in its time bubble, that even the seasons do not work there as they would normally do.
@wxwaxone6 ай бұрын
The observation of Goldberry’s expressly emphasized seasonality being the opposite of Galadriel and her Wood’s expressly emphasized disruption of the usual seasons is really important, I think. Tolkien did that on purpose, for certain.
@paulbrickler6 ай бұрын
Once again, I'd like to compliment you on your art selection for the visuals. I watch other Tolkien channels and see a lot of the same (very, very well-produced) images repeated there. Many of your selections are new to me and equally well done.
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
Thank you!!
@kayla-Rey226 ай бұрын
@@GirlNextGondor So who on earth was that supposedf to be in the final art photo? Goldberry is described as being as slender as a willow-wand yet the person depicted in that picture is anything but slim. Her thigh is thicker than my whole body. Has Goldberry benn on steroids?
@tiltskillet70856 ай бұрын
Why, the answer is right there, Springing fair in the video: Goldberry, GNG my dear, she's a merry yellow berry-o!
@louisebrouillette55806 ай бұрын
Goldberry has always fascinated me, so thank you, Lexi, for this deep dive into her lore. It's a great day when GirlNextGondor teaches us!
@hipsterhunter4eva9016 ай бұрын
This was fr a great video. I loved the comparisons to Galadriel. I never thought of her as a “Galadriel-warmup.” I also love that you dissected Goldberry as opposed to Tom. I don’t think I’ve seen another Tolkien channel do that.
@pwmiles566 ай бұрын
It's probably not very important, but I think it likely that Goldberry descends from the river-fairies in The Water-Babies (1863) by Charles Kingsley -- a strange, pro-Darwinian children's story which was a Christmas gift-book in Tolkien's youth. The fairies are portrayed similarly to real water-creatures, rather like young-Goldberry, and they have a Queen who would be the River-woman.
@Makkaru1126 ай бұрын
And said mother easily has a connection as a Maia of Ulmo’s lot
@itsjkforreal5 ай бұрын
... i.o. descends - ascends maybe?
@pwmiles565 ай бұрын
@@itsjkforreal I meant it was her ancestry as a concept :-))
@alesiabradley53996 ай бұрын
I love the characters of Tom Bombadill and Gold Berry. I felt that the fellowship of the ring wasn't complete without them in the movie. I was also disippointed about the fight for the shire. That should have been included too.
@crhu3196 ай бұрын
The movies are crap without those. Those two events are the absolute soul of the book. They symbolize Tolkien's utopic Catholic vision of what life could be, and how to feel to achieve it, AND that you cannot ever "go home again" after participating in any conflict abroad. It changes you AND your home. These are absolutely the critical points Tolkien made about conflict and harmony. It also makes no sense that the hobbits become leaders at home with no demonstration of what they had learned in war.. and how Frodo felt isolated in a Shire touched by war. SO MUCH could have been done with both. Instead we got what seems like 20.minutes of gay-adjacent greetings and battle scenes that should have been laid aside for the extended edition so the emotional parts of the story got more space. For this reason I don't mind at all extending Arwens part so much, she is serving as Goldsberry and Glorfindel both. As wormtongue kills Sharkey anyway this is less shifty but misses that the setting is the point.
@frankydaulman22916 ай бұрын
Ahh the unique and beloved Goldberry thankfully getting some attention at last. Blessings of Elbereth upon you.
@emdeejay74326 ай бұрын
Perfect discussion to listen to while im outside transplanting a bunch of seedlings in the fog while its lightly misting rain. Not rain just mist drops. Perfect discussion for this. Loved it thanks.
@michaelman9576 ай бұрын
Having watched farther, I change my answer to Tom being an uncorrupted Man (evil thus has no power over him, nor even does death) wooing a playful Maiar. Which is honestly quite a wholesome romance.
@tarkadal55636 ай бұрын
This doesn’t make sense to me, because Men in Tolkeins lore were always subject to death, death being Iluvatar’s gift to men.
@Requiemslove6 ай бұрын
He is described differently to that of a man. If I recall he is described as somewhat taller and yet as burly as any dwarf yet shorter in stature than a man. Beside which he is known as "the first". If we take that literally, the FIRST sentient being, period. At the least of flesh and blood. Tom was walking before there were the Elves. No Ent's had been created, and no Dwarfs were awake yet. I see him more as a caretaker sent to Arda by the authority [Eru] to better prepare it for what was to come, which eventually set aside that duty when Bombadil found a spot in Arda that Bombadil cherished. We have to remember that even the Ainur didn't take up physical forms until they went to what would become the "undying" lands. Which lends credence to the very real possibility that Bombadil really WAS the first. [as in the first sentient being sent to Arda] I see it as Eru cast about Eru's gaze, looking for a likely gardener, and then fixated on whatever passes for the spirit of Tom Bombadil, who was more than willing to fulfil that role. [initially]
@gganbp6 ай бұрын
Haven't seen the video yet, but I gotta say you always come up with the best video ideas. We all love to theorize on merry fellow Bombadil, but Goldberry is as mysterious as him. Surely we can learn more about Tolkien's world by diving into her character. Edit: Watched it now, I loved to hear about Goldberry's connection to Ulmo and especially her place in the story and themes of LOTR. Her and Bombadil are more connected to Middle-Earth (both in universe and in the meta narrative) than I had previously thought. Beautifully crafted video 💛
@annabizaro-doo-dahАй бұрын
Yes I love this analysis. They may be a representation of the old Gods, the nature gods of animism as you say which were always tied to a geographical place. In fact even El, God of the bible was originally tied to one mountain, one area.
@joshuapatrick6826 ай бұрын
the River daughter? boom... when's lunch?
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
It's right now, apparently 🤣
@joshuapatrick6826 ай бұрын
@@GirlNextGondor :)
@joshuapatrick6826 ай бұрын
@@GirlNextGondor hey am I dreaming or did you change the title because I feel like I wouldn't have made that joke if it was up there already? I won't tell if you did.
@JanjayTrollface6 ай бұрын
I can't believe I hadn't really noticed most of the many parallels between Goldberry and Galadriel.....
@robertcoplin28306 ай бұрын
I've wondered about Goldberry. She and Tom are favorites of mine. I think that the idea that she is linked with Ulmo, perhaps a Maia, makes a lot of sense. I also have wondered if she and Tom are Elementals of something like. It seems likely that they were sung into existence when Middle Earth was.
@Enerdhil6 ай бұрын
You mean during the Ainulindalë? That could be true.
@ColossusBall6 ай бұрын
This is the best video about Goldberry/Tom ever done. For so many reasons.
@1977rodi6 ай бұрын
I'm glad you talked about her. She's one of my favorite characters of The Lord of the Rings novels.
@DrTimes996 ай бұрын
She's the secret love child of Ulmo and Yavanna. As a result she is not a Valar or Maiar. as she was never an Ainur. Yet she is clearly not a Child of Illuvitar. The stillness of a flowing river, or the persistence of change in the seasons, a being of beautiful paradox.
@sbeaber6 ай бұрын
That... is, surprisingly, not a bad theory. A child of two Ainur... Great theory!
@Requiemslove6 ай бұрын
An interesting theory, but it is flawed. The problem is, Eru is THE God. The first and the timeless, the immutable, the forever, the has always, will always be. Eru, created everything, even that which Eru didn't consciously bring into being, exists due to Eru's subconscious thought filling in the blanks. That is what the "nameless" and such as Ungoliant are. Ultimately, everything owe's its creation to Eru, for only Eru "can" create. If Goldberry is the love child of Yavanna and Aule, well, guess what, the conception of that is because of Eru, on a very real biological level. Eru is THE God of Tolkien's world. And much like God, for Tolkien, creates EVERYTHING as far as he as a Christian, is concerned, so does Eru. They are one and the same concept. Goldberry is then a child of Illuvator, because EVERYTHING is. [Even Tom Bombadil]
@wxwaxone6 ай бұрын
What a theory!
@DrTimes996 ай бұрын
@@Requiemslove Child of Illuvitar in this sense is a reference to the Children of Eru Illuvitar, those being Elves, Men, and the "adopted" Dwarves. Goldberry is not any of those three.
@Requiemslove6 ай бұрын
@@DrTimes99 Yes. I know that. You merely quote the Silmarillian, Dr Times. But Eru created far more than the "races". Directly or indirectly, Eru creates EVERYTHING that exists in all of the universe of that fiction. That includes all the Valar, the Maia and all the lesser spirits after which. Be that direct creation or indirect creation. Direct being that which Eru is well aware that Eru did. Indirect being either that which came FROM what Eru created, as in the albeit rare progeny OF Valar's and maia, or that which Eru subconsciously made, because EVERYTHING needs an opposite. That is for example what Ungoliant is about. Yes, in fact, Eru CREATED Ungoliant. Whether Eru would choose to accept that or not. What I am saying here is that in the case of Goldberry, whatever she "is" directly or indirectly she was created by Eru. There's no way she could "not" be, because EVERYTHING see's it's uttermost source in Illuvatar. From the children Eru claims directly to every spirit Eru fashioned in the dawn of time itself to "not be lonely", to the nameless and the evil and the foul things that crawl around in the dark recesses away from the light, to every progeny of any sentient creature that has ever been. All of it, EVERYTHING is created by Eru. Eru is the spark that causes everything that has ever or will ever be, cause to be. The alpha and omega and every other phrase. The centre of all that there is. Because Eru is THE God of Tolkien's fiction, and is much akin to Tolkien's Christian God. [That is regardless of any of us knowing in the very LITERAL sense that Tolkien himself, made everything, that is a moot point in the case of the canon of the fiction]
@GravesRWFiA6 ай бұрын
the 2nd night in the house Frodo's dream implies a link between the house and the West. goldberry being a miar of Ulmo makes a lot of sense suddenly
@HonkIfYouLoveBeer6 ай бұрын
Bombadillowing! 😂 I’m using this moving forward as a gentler synonym for ‘faffing about,’ like the crooked-yet-joyous path to completing weekend chores
@oldlifter5306 ай бұрын
I just thought of Tom as representing Tolkien's love of Great Britain's country and country folk.
@DavidRoberts6 ай бұрын
Thanks for another video! Always a good day when they land. I like how you even formatted Tom's prose with linebreaks to reflect the poetic meter of his speech 🙂
@michaelman9576 ай бұрын
I always figured Tom was basically Man before the Fall (an un-Fallen Adam), so Goldberry could be an un-Fallen Eve.
@ImagineMySurprise5106 ай бұрын
I think I favor the idea that Bombadil is a manifestation of Ea itself, which is the master but does not dominate others, and Goldberry is that part of Ea that is the progress and process of the living things on Ea, the turning of the seasons, and the things that a life on Ea. Thus Bombadil and Goldberry work in concert to make a total whole. This is reflected in how they worked separately yet clearly in concert in laying the table before the meal.
@annabizaro-doo-dahАй бұрын
Yes, Erû's "Holy" spirit or active force & Gold berry mother nature, Gaia etc. Tom *may* also be the incarnation of "Being" left over from the Ainulindalë? Just imo🤷♀️
A thought occurred to me during the discussion of Goldberry possibly being a Maia of Ulmo: If I'm not mistaken (please correct me if I am), Tolkien didn't fully abandon the concept of some Maiar being children of the Valar until _after_ the publication of LotR. So in that context, Goldberry being "daughter of the River" might then take an interesting meaning.
@Enerdhil6 ай бұрын
Nevertheless it is ancient lore, which Tolkien would dismiss later in his life.
@Requiemslove6 ай бұрын
@@Enerdhil He would be the authority on it all. Still, it's interesting to consider nonetheless. I get the impression he abandoned that specific strand because of the sheer headache it would cause. How much bigger would the geneology be if the Valar and offspring [?] were also included? [Along with all Samwise's children, ETC...]
@sulljoh16 ай бұрын
70th birthdays are beautiful 💜❤️ 80 and 90 are hard but most of us will get 70
@tornadomuchacho6 ай бұрын
I was so excited when I saw this content in my feed. Thank you!
@SG-1-GRC6 ай бұрын
I always got the feeling that Tom and Goldberry were aligned to the spirit of place 'gods'. River spirits in Goldberry's case and certainly in Tom's case you gather that within his own 'Kingdom' he's very powerful. So much so that the ring has absolutely zero influence on him. But outside of it might well be another matter. Both Tom and Goldberry are clearly closely aligned to nature and Tom's chief role seems to be both to nurture it and prevent it from being imbalanced, hence his contention with 'Old Man Willow' which is a form of nature turned into a malevolent force. In either case everything about Tom and Goldberry is always tied to place. They are reminiscent of the lesser Gods of place worshiped in particular by the Romans and by the Teutonic and Celtic peoples. Gods tied to a particular river, spring, forest or even a region. All powerful in their own place but otherwise limited in power. Tom contends with local matters, his enemies are local, his wife local, his acquaintances generally come to see him (not the other way around) unless they live nearby, like Farmer Maggot. He is tied to 'place'.
@omarsalama4846 ай бұрын
Best channel on KZbin!! ♥️
@CaptainPlainJaneway3 ай бұрын
I think Tom Bombadil is a part of Gandalf that he separated from to save his joy and innocence from the horrors of Mordor as sort of a time capsule from better days. The long talk before he left for Valinor was him rejoining/remembering who he was before setting off on his mission.
@ishmiel216 ай бұрын
Nice to have you back :)
@RJCE4206 ай бұрын
She is the River-woman's daughter
@David.Bowman.6 ай бұрын
I don’t believe there is a River woman. I think it’s a deliberate mistranslation, a device of Tolkien to pick homophones but to use both their meanings from different languages. In this case in Welsh (the inspiration for Sindarin) the word ‘merch’ can be ‘woman, girl, maiden’. But in other languages, the word ‘merc’ is at the root of words meaning ‘mark, boundary, border’ ie Mercia, Westmarch, the Marish etc So I think ‘river woman’s daughter’ is more like ‘daughter/maiden of the river’s edge/border’. What’s fun is applying this concept to other names and I found something interesting for Finduilas: (also from Welsh) Ffin > of ‘boundary, border’ Dwr > water Las > maybe short for ‘lass’ girl/maiden (as in ‘Frodo-lad’ and ‘Rosie-lass’) So ‘Finduilas’ can perhaps also be interpreted as ‘maiden of the river’s edge/border’🫠
@ravendelacour19176 ай бұрын
That translation suggests Goldberry is a liminal being between the elemental realm of water and the material world.
@David.Bowman.6 ай бұрын
@@ravendelacour1917 Indeed. And one has to wonder what water we might be discussing and what kind of border. Can you think of another example, perhaps more biological than geological?
@ravendelacour19176 ай бұрын
@@David.Bowman. Are you aware of the mythic concept of the Anima/Animus, the living spirit of a place? Goldberry strongly resembles such a being embodying the waters of the Old Forest and Tom the land. Each representing where raw primal nature of the land and the human intersect. Their relationship embodying the water and land mingling and providing the land life.
@David.Bowman.6 ай бұрын
@@ravendelacour1917I wasn’t familiar with that term but they definitely do fit that description! I was being more broad - though not unrelated - the ‘border’ is a womb, and the ‘water’ being amniotic fluid. What’s fun is if you break down the name Elbereth Gilthoniel: ‘gilth’ could come from the Gothic/Germanic ‘kilþei’ meaning ‘womb, uterus’. ‘oniel’ could be a singular suffix taken from Latin ‘-onia’, which formed Roman goddess names. Which brings me back to my other comment where I mentioned the British legend of Sabrina of the River Severn. Which matches up nicely with your description 😊 So Goldberry can also be linked through metaphor, etymology and mythology to Varda herself!
@napoleonfeanor6 ай бұрын
At the council, it seems Gandalf had no idea Tom was still there while Aragorn seemed to know him.
@joannakeenan33556 ай бұрын
It was Elrond who had forgotten Tom, not Gandalf. Elrond then wondered aloud if he was the same being as was heard of long ago, and if he was, should he have been summoned to the council. Gandalf just says that Tom would not have come.
@XellossBoi6 ай бұрын
A breath-taking analysis! Perhaps your best yet! Thanks to your sharing your thoughts and insights, my rereading have become profoundly enriched. Thank you!
@55tranquility2 ай бұрын
I went through a stage of obsessing about Tom and Goldberry trying to work out what and who they are. Then the conclusion I reached is they are magical beings, mysterious and ancient the remains of things long gone and forgotten from history never recorded and remembered only by a few of the wise. They are an enigma and that is what they are and who they are - understanding them is like trying to catch smoke in your hands or hers cats - if you come close to understanding them they evaporate and disappear an answer doesn't exist it eludes understanding- they simply 'are' and that is all anyone can know, it's a zen like answer and I think that is what Tolkien meant - that sometimes awe or fascination is enough and all we can hope for with characters like this as they are beyond any other form of analysis.
@fredkrissman65276 ай бұрын
Beautiful commentary for a foggy afternoon. Thanx!
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
Excellent weather for it!
@NatsAstrea6 ай бұрын
I've always thought it was interesting that Frodo's dream/vision of the undying lands came in the home of Tom and Goldberry, long before the hobbits got to Lothlorien and Galadriel.
@_creighton6 ай бұрын
Your scholarship is so impressive... and more impressively, matched by your delightful presentation. Much respect! Thank you for sharing your insights.
@eliscanfield39136 ай бұрын
Maybe it helps that Goldberry has a rather hobbit-ish name while Galadriel has a pretty foreign one from the hobbits' perspective. It probably feels a bit more comfortingly familiar; it's certainly not ethereal.
@matthewdunham16896 ай бұрын
I heard she and Tom represented Tolkien and his wife. ❤ Their Stan Lee cameo moment for a lack of a better example.
@danielbuzi77426 ай бұрын
This is my favorite of your essays so far! We’ll done!!! They both make me think of the Tao.
@calorion3 ай бұрын
What I love about this channel as compared to similar ones is that you look not only at the source material, but at the scholarship. I may one day read HOME; I will never read he journals. So you doing it for me is greatly appreciated.
@joseraulcapablanca85646 ай бұрын
This was great stuff GNG, your drawing out of parallels, both between Goldberry and Galadriel and between Goldberry and other mythic figures is illuminating. For me Goldberry is one of the most delightful mysteries, which the professor spreads throughout his works for us. I most often see her as a spirit of change, who somehow remains constant. Luckily she is a down to earth character, easier for us lowly folk to love than some of the higher characters. I also love how she changes the hobbits and the nature of the book. Thank you.
@docopoper6 ай бұрын
This video has made the themes of a TTRPG character I've been playing every week for several years click into place. Thank you. My character was heavily inspired by Lúthien, and a dash of Goldberry is totally what I need to finish off her story. Goldberry is one of those characters that I find I haven't thought about a lot, but her themes and vibes have been growing inside me for many years. Like, she's very important in a very subtle and not necessary to speak way. But when somebody as skilled as yourself comes out and makes a video discussing Goldberry it does prove the value of words in crystallising thoughts and vibes.
@joannemoore39766 ай бұрын
Lexi this was just brilliant, i may have to listen to it again, it is so rich. Thanks for pointing out the parallels between the encounters with Goldberry and Galadriel. Also that wonderful hint of mysticism at the (as in transcending time and space) which Tom also does when he leads the hobbits back to the silence of the heavens. It is a sudden fear and wonder of that silence that makes Frodo ask Tom who he is. Then a shadow passes the window and Goldberry comes in. What an absolutely brilliant writer Tolkien was.
@cojo96566 ай бұрын
I really like the idea of her being a Maia, but in my headcanon whenever I read through LoTR, I like to think of her as some kind of conceptual river spirit. I got the vibe she may be an embodiment of how the sound of water is the closest thing to the music of the Ainur brought to being, especially with how intrinsic singing seems to be to her character!
@EriktheRed20236 ай бұрын
The one does not preclude the other.
@Requiemslove6 ай бұрын
Cant she not be both? Consider when Bombadil is joking about the one Ring. To him, it's a mere trifle. A toy of little consequence. And how when he put it on [for Tom put ON the one Ring] he didn't vanish from sight, and said and DEMONSTRATED to Frodo that he could see Frodo when Frodo had the ring on. Tom is both of the seen and the unseen, as much in one as in the other. More so even than any Elf of any stature. Tom remarks on "catching" Goldberry, that "and her heart was a beating". Could it not be that he was delighted at finding a being much like he? That she is there, corporeally, yet also innately a spirit made flesh? A spirit that eventually became a living being. As though, just maybe, Eru was like "Oh go on then, live, have fun out there". And then Tom Bombadil, who claims he is the "first" had a companion. One created initially just as a spirit of the prominent river in that region yet eventually became more.
@ronniecorbett63066 ай бұрын
I think Tom is an accidental good created by Morgoth's part of the song. He can easily handle the ring because of this. Every good character in the story are affected by the ring negatively, Tom isn't. Goldberry is his compass that keeps him on the right path with her love she has for him and his love for her.
@Karin_Allen6 ай бұрын
What a great analysis! This is the first time I've gotten a recommendation for your channel, and I'll definitely be back for more. I have to admit that I never thought much about where Goldberry came from, although if anyone had asked me, I'd have guessed she was a Maia of Ulmo's domain - a child of a river-dwelling Maia, I guess. I also want to thank you for curating *good* art for your video - and for crediting the artists on the spot rather than jumbling all their names together in the end credits or description. This sets you apart from other certain Tolkien KZbinrs, and it shows you care for proper accreditation. Thanks for the lovely video!
@JoeQuake6 ай бұрын
'But she was not there, nor was it ever known whither the cold waters of Teiglin had taken her.' I like the fanciful idea that Goldberry is the reincarnation of Nienor's unborn child. Died in a river...reborn in another river. (Water lilies are sometimes associated with reincarnation.)
@michaelfritts62496 ай бұрын
I like that.. my hopeful theory was possibly Nienor Niniel, but this actually makes a bit more sense. Maybe not even reincarnated, but saved/rescued?.. Thank you!! 🤗
@JoeQuake6 ай бұрын
@@michaelfritts6249 🙂
@smillee19576 ай бұрын
Yay! I've been excited for your next video. I love it already.
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
Yay! Thank you!
@mattcarnevali6 ай бұрын
I’ve always thought of Tom and Goldberry as Father Time (he always existed) and Mother Nature
@alexv33575 ай бұрын
My favourite explanation for Tom comes from the fanfiction The Green Ring by EvadneGrande. The story is about a girl from modern Earth who happens across one of old Andrew Ketterly's world-hopping rings from The Magician's Nephew and is sent to Middle Earth at the end of the Third Age. Tom is a boy who was sent to Middle Earth way back at the very dawn of creation, before even elves, and has been wandering ever since. The fact that he is from outside of Arda is why he is not subject to Arda's laws, and hence is ageless and able to handle the One Ring without issue.
@robingile43016 ай бұрын
Meeting a lady at the river can be life changing.
@EriktheRed20236 ай бұрын
Leonard Cohen wrote a song about that.
@RaverQuarterHorses6 ай бұрын
As always, such a great video!
@davidanderson_surrey_bc6 ай бұрын
Who knew you could get 32 minutes of great scholarship out of such scant source material?
@tamlynburleigh92676 ай бұрын
In his Narnia story C,S.Lewis included Bachus, plus a few other mythological creatures, such as fawns. This Tolkein woman sounds like a personification of Spring. I think there was a Greek goddess, Flora(?) who left a trail of flowers.
@joelleblanc86706 ай бұрын
THANK YOU. I feel like I truly understand Goldberry now.
@robertflury33496 ай бұрын
I really appreciate the work you're putting into this
@theo-dr2dz6 ай бұрын
Tom Bombadil and Goldberry are also the representatives of a happy marriage. They are very different, yet devoted to each other. And in some strange way they also fit, they belong together. They are just happy together in their own little corner of the world and that's enough for them.
@TheHoneyBadger-yh5vj6 ай бұрын
May God bless you and your work young lady Next Gondor💙💙💙💙😇😇😇
@ericvanvlandren89876 ай бұрын
It is fascinating how Tolkien repeated themes as personified by specific characters. Goldberry/Galadriel as we see here. Glorfindel/Gandalf of course. Possibly Beorn/Treebeard? I would love GNG to do one of her excellent video essays on this idea of character theme recycling.
@EriktheRed20236 ай бұрын
Théoden/Fingolfin has come up in video, and the mirrored echoes of Théoden/Denethor has a video of its own. I'm sure there are more mentions. All the same, I agree it would be a fascinating topic to tackle.
@sakomanlee6 ай бұрын
Since music is so central to the essence of both characters, I always thought that they represent some of the original notes in the Music of the Ainur that were displaced when Melkor started scatting and were spun out into physical forms when Eru intervened. Great video, again. thanks.
@duncansutherland476 ай бұрын
I’ve also been interested in who Goldberry was. I’ve wondered why there hasn’t been more curiosity regarding her origin, powers and the love she and Tom share. Thank you for all you have shared!
@seanparker55956 ай бұрын
Brilliant analysis, both scholarly and inspiring. This whole passage of LotR is really fundamental to my enjoyment of the Legendarium. Thank you for your take on her literary purpose as well as her place in the ontology of Tolkiens mythology.
@fluorotoluene6 ай бұрын
I always thought of Tom as an embodiment or necessary aspect of *the* song, and as Goldberry as a singer of some sort - a Maia of Ulmo definitely works
@nightmare.atelier6 ай бұрын
Incredible analysis of these characters, and I loved all the art you picked.
@astrogypsy6 ай бұрын
Don' you crush my lilies! ('Cause lilies be my crush.) BTW, Terrific analysis as always.
@expred6 ай бұрын
Your video essays are always top notch. They reach a level of depth, interconnectivity and amount of insight which is honestly impressive. Your delivery is also crystal clear and sometimes frankly put hilarious, I do love the occasional dry humor here and there. (I'm still laughing over "hijinxes ensue" as your description of the entirity of events of LotR in one of the videos, think it was about Arwen&Aragorn)... I'm not a native English speaker but I can still tell your essays have great structure, they are very academic and scholarly, just overall well written. Still they're not dry, they have a sparkle of magic in them. Quite like Tolkien himself. I think the most impressive thing however is how with almost every single video you've managed to breathe life into any topic by presenting new perspectives - even topics I feel I "know everything about". I am proven wrong every time, and to "know everything about Tolkien" is pretty much like saying "i understand all of quantum physics". If I say I do, I don't. I'm sure Tolkien himself would be impressed by your work. What a shame he isn't around to hear these, to see how we people connect over his stories still so long after his passing. Lexi, may you have a summer blessed by the Valar themselves!
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
The same to you, friend! I'm very grateful you took the time to write this out - it matters a lot to me that my videos keep a sense of humor no matter how scholarly they get, so I'm always particularly happy when I hear others value it too. And I definitely agree that knowing 'everything about Tolkien' is impossible; no matter how deep into the books I go, I'm always left feeling like I'm standing on the shore of an ocean, trying to see across it. Of course, that's part of the fun 😁 Thanks again 💖I'm glad you've enjoyed the channel and really appreciate the feedback!
@expred6 ай бұрын
@@GirlNextGondor I'm happy to have made a positive impact with my comment. The scholarly professionalism with an occasional witty comment here and there makes a big difference in my opinion. I always thought learning should be entertaining, so I might be a bit biased here. Jokes and other forms of entertainment make even the heaviest of topics more digestible. And I don't seem to be the only one enjoying the humor (The comment section of your videos are a gold mine on their own and surprisingly civil for, well, an Internet comment section. Your squad definitely loves you). Every time I think I've finished hearing all the details about any Tolkien topic, I just seem to reach "new unattainable vistas" as the Fantasy OG himself would probably phrase it. And it's amazing. I still can't believe all of this stuff I've spent years researching as a hobby comes from the mind of basically a single person (of course he draws influence from others and myths, and there is the amazing work of Christopher Tolkien which deserve all the praise in the world, but in the end it is still pretty much a one man project). The mind can truly be a vast and a beautiful place. It's also trippy to imagine how Tolkien never could have foreseen how successful his works would become. Being an artist myself (though not literary, but audio/visuals), the thought of dedicating my life to pretty much a single project and not even knowing if people will care, truly speaks for how much this project meant to the man himself. I'd imagine any kind of fame was an afterthought. But I'm getting sidetracked here. Thanks for taking the time to reply and as always, looking forward to the next one! Though, especially with your quality of research, I definitely would choose quality over quantity here (as pretty much anywhere tbh). Doesn't matter how long it takes, so don't feel too pressured to come up with something, the squad will gladly wait for more :)
@EmpressOfTears6 ай бұрын
I adore this... I adore this so much.
@DJHigher16 ай бұрын
You and Darth Gandalf are absolutely carrying the lotr KZbin community rn. Nice change of pace from the countless tom bombadil theories and how powerful is sauron trash.
@izzycurer12606 ай бұрын
Tokein hated allegory, so anything he meant by his stories was unintentional unless he was unconsciously channeling some cosmic truth. That being said, if Galadriel is the Empress in a deck of tarot, then Goldberry is the Queen of Hearts. So, basically the same thing, just with some nuance.
@thomedwards81866 ай бұрын
Great video as always.
@alcuinmagus6 ай бұрын
Excellent! This is the best analysis of Goldberry I've read or heard in 50 years.
@estherandreasen3666 ай бұрын
Goldberry's association with seasons also reminds me of Vana with her flowers and spring thing. Could we be dealing with a duel associated Maia like Olorin or something?
@pwmiles566 ай бұрын
Picking up on my comment about The Water-Babies, it's interesting that the original Bombadil poem appeared in 1934, soon after 'Errantry' was also published in the Oxford Magazine. 'Errantry' has an insectile motif, much like Drayton's 'Nymphidia' of 1627 , which Tolkien later poured scorn on in 'On Fairy Stories'. Anyway, Goldberry's transition from aquatic to terrestrial life does recall the life-cycle of dragonflies and damselflies -- very pretty creatures and familiar sights on English riverbanks. This isn't to say there aren't other layers of meaning, but it might account for some of the imagery.
@David.Bowman.6 ай бұрын
I see a lot of your comments and they’re always interesting 🤓 Did you happen to see my comment referencing Sabrina and Thomas Arne’s Comus? I was wondering if you knew any more about her legend and if it was perhaps relevant. As an off-shoot, I did a little jump when I found that Thomas Arne also wrote Rule Britannia, which was later given an alternate set of lyrics called ‘Married to a Mermaid’!
@pwmiles566 ай бұрын
@@David.Bowman. Thank you. I should have acknowledged that it was you who gave me the idea about the dragonfly-nymphs. I don't know much about Sabrina except that she is a character in Comus, the masque originally by Milton. She lives in the River Severn and she has a stepmother, Gwendolen. Tolkien certainly knew Comus, Shippey points out various influences, but I don't know if it is particularly at play here.
@David.Bowman.6 ай бұрын
@@pwmiles56 lol did I? Not sure how but you’re welcome! I never knew anything much about her either until last year, and only learned enough to keep it in the back of my mind. In the Comus play she basically represents Chastity being pursued by the unbridled lust of Comus, assisted by an ‘unnamed guardian’ angelic being. The statues at Croome Court are remarkably similar in appearance to the descriptions of characters in LotR. Her myth is a lot older and has the usual muddied origin but essentially imported by the Romans after they landed at the Severn. One of the stories about the river Severn itself follows the kind of trope of three paths: easy, medium, difficult: and the Severn is so long because she wanted to see so much of the country and bring life to as many people along the way before finally making it out to sea. Still, I always wonder why people leap to Germanic or Norse inspirations, when Britain already has its own. It need not be all Beowulf!
@Valdagast6 ай бұрын
_Ol' man river, that ol' man river_ _He don't say nothin', but he must know somethin'_ _He just keeps rollin', he keeps on rollin' along_
@chibip66 ай бұрын
Thanks for the new content! Made my morning 🌞🌱🍃
@TarMody6 ай бұрын
My theory: Goldberry and Tom Bombadil are benevolent spiritual beings (not like elven and human soul types) and are essentially nature spirits, formed as a vision of the harmony in the Music of the Ainur and realized in parallel with Eru's creation of Arda with the Secret Fire. They have realized an incarnated existence in the form of the Children of Iluvatar, such as the Valar and Maiar, who caused their existence. Since she is a river girl, it can be inferred that Ulmo's melodies are dominant in the harmony in the nature of her formation. Frodo's dream may be a vision of the possible future of Arda drawn by the Music of the Ainur. According to this theory, their relationship with this creation music attracts attention in this context.
@shanenolan56256 ай бұрын
Thank you, lexi never got a notification on this one ..
@GirlNextGondor6 ай бұрын
Oh no! Well, you're here now and that's what matters. Hope you enjoyed it, Mr. Nolan!
@shanenolan56256 ай бұрын
@GirlNextGondor no worries, it happens with lots of channels. Always a pleasure to hear you voice, I did have to pause it , but I was enjoying it very much ( Shane Nolan Always enjoys your videos) 😆 Tom bombadil * . Have good weekend
@amh94946 ай бұрын
"and a merry yellow berry-o" 😑 Lmao your delivery makes me laugh sometimes.
@bigsarge20856 ай бұрын
Seems simple to me now, considering your excellent deep dives, but I always perceived Goldberry as the manifest spirit of the river(s) in the say way as (and a counterpoint to) Tom Bombadil seemed like the manifest spirit of the earth.
@gregjones78786 ай бұрын
Amazing. I have so many theories about Goldberry now and a few more about Tom. I won’t burden you with them.
@daHarry-ec4ce6 ай бұрын
for me, Tom and goldberry represent this aspect of the world that "just is", irrespective of whether some upright walking apes (or diminutive soon-to-be heroes) can understand it or not. Some things we just, as an individual, won't know or understand, try as we might....
@TadiatLore6 ай бұрын
Great, as usual :)
@jameshumphrey23456 ай бұрын
Excellent food for (getting lost in) thought! As you teased out the subtle differences between Bombadil’s and Goldberry’s behavior, it occurred to me that Tom incessantly (seemingly without willing it) talks and sings in the same poetic meter, as though he were a fairly pure expression of a specific motif in the music of the Ainur - perhaps taking on a body and a name only because he likes interaction with nature and occasionally with other sentient folks. Goldberry certainly can sing, but her songs seem to have a different quality of intentionality. Tom flows with things and occasionally employs some verbal tai chi to avoid drowning or injury; Goldberry understands the flows but also makes things happen on a larger scale (very consistent with the “Maia of Ulmo” hypothesis). And over the years they learn of each other’s ways, so that while still distinct from each other their views and purposes drift closer together over the years. Dang, I’ve got to go make some progress on my fanfic now.
@Eloraurora6 ай бұрын
I love this theory. Just Tom Bombadil written as a song with a 'repeat from :' notatation at the end of the tune, under which are scribbled his many, many verses.
@richardclark.6 ай бұрын
I do not know where Tom came from but I know where he went. In the 4th age he became a rapper with the name Tom daBombadil.