Who was Bahira?

[@Oldwhiteguy]

Man I just can’t get enough of this guy. The way he discusses Islam is so clinical and basic fact based it’s amazing it’s never been presented in this manner before. Love it.

[@djcudworth2355]

Looking up Bill Warner at Center for Politcal Islam

[@Kleyana]

I love how calmly and professionally you approach your critics. Great work Daniel!

[@Morgow1]

I wish there was an entire social network with doctors explaining matters this way. We would all be so much more informed.

[@benrex7775]

Theoretically yes. But pastors and church leaders would need to promote it as well. By the way if you want to watch Christian people in the field of science who believe in young earth creationism then I can recommend the KZbin Channel "Evidence and Reasons". If you got burned by Kent Hovind then it is still worth a try. Sal goes at it from a different angle. And DrJamesTour is also a great researcher who is Christian and critiqued abiogenesis.

[@salahtube7924]

Look up Dr Roy Casagranda.

[@St705]

Thanks for your scholarly work Dr Brubaker and keep it coming.

[@walkerjobe6964]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5e0Y5WhhJ2sbaM

[@walkerjobe6964]

@코카콜벳cccb01닷com Do you speak a Engrish?

[@qasimrafiq6067]

Praise The Lord More Blessings

[@alanbutler7712]

Fantastic! Thank you for the deep dive!

[@mytaichi5945]

Loved your Video so happy to be able to hear from scholars without having to pay admission to a great college

[@John-qo6fs]

Wow, you are doing an amazing job and millions will be benefiting from these videos of you. Keep it up.

[@HH-ss9vj]

I’m a critical Muslim and native Arabic speaker. We need more people like Dr Brubaker. He’s very sincere and I’m honestly tired of two extremes. Like one extreme are Muslim scholars that blind folded follow the Muslim traditions and have no critical view and the other extreme like David wood and Jay Smith. Keep up your good work and don’t get intimidated by anyone. Jazzek allah khir!

[@variantquran4505]

Thank you, H H, for this kind assessment.

[@variantquran4505]

@Siraj Haq I made a quick response with some comments last week and I will do a more detailed one soon. Please be patient, as my life is not to be spent responding to critics but rather carrying on work, answering critics along the way. For my earlier response to the only other critique from a scholarly venue, see: www.academia.edu/44923907/Corrections_to_Hythem_Sidkys_review_of_Corrections_in_Early_Qurʾān_Manuscripts_Twenty_Examples

[@nobleprince1238]

Please would you mind if I ask a question related your comment on extremes. There are 2 people - you may know them already - who seem to be on an entirely different spectrum to those you mentioned: The authors of "The deception of Allah" and "Why I am not a Muslim". What do you think about these two? One of them is certainly a native Arabic speaker.

[@HH-ss9vj]

@@nobleprince1238 The deception of Allah is written by Christian Prince and he is like someone else said, an extremist. I would even call him a hate preacher. I haven’t followed him but I’ve seen some of his videos. He’s spreading hate and if he was a Muslim, he would be called a terrorist. Judging from his English accent I would say that I’m quite confident that he’s either Syrian or Lebanese Christian. There are lots of hate in the Middle East between different Christians, Muslims and sects, that’s why it’s such an unstable region with war and killing. The other person that you’re asking about, I don’t know him so I can’t comment on him.

[@zanjabil1789]

@@HH-ss9vj The most hateful person (or groups of persons) was unaguably the author of the Quran.

[@charitysimon-peraboh5555]

Thanks first time of hearing this legend, certainly it's relevant

[@walkerjobe6964]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5e0Y5WhhJ2sbaM

[@simonhengle8316]

Another excellent video, I actually learnt a bit about Christianity as well, top stuff Dr. Brubaker

[@lastprophet8338]

Keep up the good work

[@dannypantom3536]

Daniel Brubaker we stand with you & thank you for the work you’ve done ✝️🙏🏼🕊️ May god bless you and protect you my brother

[@Mokinono45]

dang, there are so many more stories about this topic than I know. Ty for the video, it's nice to know these surrounding stories.

[@walkerjobe6964]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5e0Y5WhhJ2sbaM

[@St.Irenaeus]

Another amazing video Dr.!! Great topic and thanks for the book recommendations!

[@allahallah9325]

“He [Jesus] said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah, He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet.* And He has made me blessed wherever I am and has enjoined upon me prayer and zakah as long as I remain alive.* And [made me] dutiful to my mother, and He has not made me a wretched tyrant.* And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive.” (19:30-33)

[@loosestroodle]

Who cares what muhhameds quran says? 😂 muhhamed is a liar, and 600 years too late.

[@joshuaimoru9933]

If you would believe, I think it should be, verse 33 of your Quran quote, then why does Islam refute Jesus's crucifixion?

[@sdraper2011]

Well researched and presented. Thank you.

[@truthdefenders4694]

Excellent, well done. Thank you.

[@alphonsopereira2866]

Dan, you are great, please continue to educate us and help us to see the light of God!

[@jeffczermanski2993]

I have been waiting for someone to go into the story/history of Bahira? I have always wanted to know more about this guy. Thank you. I'd love to know more about Waraqa also (and his possible impact on the Quran).

[@inquisitivemind007]

Unfortunately there is another version reported here www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1479816825/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_glc_fabc_65FW6PSWF1YWTB6W7J3S and it isn't a Christian monk now was the location the event happened in Busra, Syria.

[@afifatanjeem2464]

@@inquisitivemind007 Yeah, that is literally what is said in the video.

[@afifatanjeem2464]

@@inquisitivemind007 He was Gnostic, a non trinitian version of christianity.

[@kamelleon9131]

Muhammed didn't leave the arabian peninsula during his prophethood so it dosen't make sense

[@mercedesf1fan176]

@@kamelleon9131he did before he became prophet

[@richarddalbis3323]

The more the life of M is exposed and studied, the more I sense Islam is all allegorical in order to fit into a religion. Breaking away from Islam must be an exhilarating experience.

[@jblasutavario9549]

As an ex-muslim, I can confirm that this statement is true.

[@richarddalbis3323]

@@jblasutavario9549 Keep going in your walk of faith. Jesus changes everything.

[@richarddalbis3323]

@Zola FER I don't have a favorite verse. I've visited the middle east and I believe all the Arabs were normal in their embrace of God but men and the attraction to control and power used that attraction against them. Arabs love God but are culturally attracted to a vengeful God. Jesus dismantles that natural but unholy assertion. That's what only HE can do. Change hearts and minds.

[@fantasia55]

@OTTO OCTAVIOUS Church of England?

[@universalflamethrower6342]

As an ex lefty I can confirm this is true

[@isusjebogisaija96-75]

LORD JESUS IS ETERNAL WORD OF GOD In Flesh (Isaiah 9 : 6-7) , (Micah 5 : 2) ! ONLY WAY TO HEAVEN 🙏 (Isaiah 53) ! THANK YOU JESUS ❤️ .

[@Arcturus367]

You might check your Caps Lock? A lot of people don't like being yelled at.

[@dijonperry8286]

@@Arcturus367 WHAT?

[@Kish34630]

Via the Catholic Church ? 😂

[@Towards_Eternity]

Died for 3 days? 😂

[@jamalkhan3708]

Great video, very informative 👍 thank you for sharing.

[@peterrocky4873]

There was no Mecca during Bahira's time or Muhammad's time. Historical account and present day archeology is not conclusive. Historical writings of other known and famous cities do not refer to Mecca as a booming trade or centre of civilization as claimed by tradition being the place of Adam Eve and where Abraham destroys idols and builds the Kabah. Building of the Kabah Is mysteriously missing in the Jewish writings which should be there . In which case Isacc ( Israel )should have continued as his centre of worship.. Mecca today has nothing to prove that it was the place where Adam or Eve or Abraham and his sons were . .A huge black hole in the standard narrative

[@user-yz1dl3eu8l]

There was no Mecca, so there was no "Muhammad".

[@hereweare9096]

If Mecca was there and for such a vast amount of time. Archeology should support this. We find archeological ruins of the ancient past, so there should be some of Mecca.

[@user-yz1dl3eu8l]

@@hereweare9096 There is none.

[@hereweare9096]

@@user-yz1dl3eu8l Well that’s interesting. An ancient city such as that would have remnants of some kind. Biblical archeology shows ancient ruins/pottery/cuneiform/roads etc

[@peterrocky4873]

@@hereweare9096 This is why we suspect Mecca did not exist at Muhammed's time or it had a different.name at a different place . We suspect it could be Petra . Islam started in Iraq

[@Arcturus367]

The pile of books in the background is just a small part of the sources for the next video

[@justaminute3111]

I was just a casual listener to the local Ramadan radio station for a couple of years. This was not because I particularly interested in being converted but just learning more about another's beliefs. I had been rather impressed at how much detail about the life of their founder that they were able to access. Then the station broadcast this story. Right away all the alarm bells started ringing. If this story is true, then how can the origin story of Mohammed going into a cave, suddenly being surprised at hearing the voice of a messenger of a supernatural being and the needing to be convinced that he was a prophet of a god also be true. He should have been expecting it. Not to mention, why would the monk remain a Christian if he had had such an extraordinary revelation. It completely changed how I listened to what Muslims had to say to each other about their own religion.

[@byronlewis1330]

It seems like both Christians and Muslims have been guilty of using the tale or accounts of Bahira to further each of their aims. But I can't be sure; I think this side of heaven it is hard to discern what the truth of the story is, but if there was a Christian Monk and Mohammed had contact with him, this to me would suggest where Mohammed got part of his revelations from. This is significant for Islam as I understand they all say Quran came DIRECTLY from Allah with NO, absolutely NO human influence. This account and many other matters regards the text of the Quran I believe totally disproves this belief-set by Muslims. What do you think?

[@toomanymarys7355]

@@byronlewis1330 muhammad shows evidence of having had certain things read to him from Syriac or other Aramaic writings by a not fully literate person who doesn't know what all the words are actually supposed to be and misguesses some of the vowels. Even the name Ibrahim is wrong. There is zero reason for the As to be swapped for Is, linguistically.

[@alhassani626]

Sunnis have distorted history to denigrate the Prophet to supoort Abu Bakr and Omar's caliphate. Please research the succession to Muhammad.

[@coronateststation241]

You are totally right and this shows the historic importance of some companions of the prophet. Especially in the Ummayad dynasty, approximately starting 15 years after the death of the prophet, many hadith were burned and many others were forged. Another origin of hadith are from the family of the prophet, which were oppressed shortly after the death of the prophet himself. In those you dont find stories like he was scared from the angels. The majority of muslims believe in contradicting narrations. But for the people taking the hadiths of the prophets family and rejecting the hadiths from the ummayad dynasty (which are called shia) the story of Bahira matches perfectly with the behaviour of the prophet when he received revelation

[@kanwalsaeed6414]

I think He remained christian because at that time Muhammad was just 8 years old and he claimed prophethood at age of 40.. 32 years difference

[@Chandransingham]

I watched this extended video programme twice to follow the 'fascinating stuff' of complex historical writings/traditions of the Christian monk Bahira. Thanks very much Dr Brubaker for taking us on your amazing journey of discovery. Only recently I was reading the book of Daniel in the Revised New Jerusalem Bible, Study Edition (2019) with Henry Wansbrough notes. Your study comparison of young Muhammad and young David is truly fascinating. Equally Bahira's foretelling of what Muhammad would do much later in his life as the commander-in-chef, I think; was probably God telling himself. cf Jesus encounter in the temple elders when he was 12. The rest was history as laid out in Gullaume's Sira and Roggema's powerful Syriac and Arabic recensions.

[@inquisitivemind007]

There is a contemporary of Ibn Ishaq whose biography of Muhammad we translated in 2014 www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1479816825/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_glc_fabc_65FW6PSWF1YWTB6W7J3S and it isn't a Christian monk named Bahira nor was the location of where this happened in Busra, Syria 🇸🇾

[@yvonnegonzales2973]

Thanks for the info doc, i know this already long time ago but I'm lacking in early start of my studies, that book hard to find

[@Aramis7998]

This monk is mentioned through not by name in The works of John of Damascus, The part "heresy of the ishmaelites" written in The ca. 740s

[@variantquran4505]

Thank you for this information. My colleague, Daniel Janosik, wrote his doctoral dissertation on John of Damascus: www.amazon.com/John-Damascus-First-Apologist-Muslims/dp/1498289827/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=janosik+damascus&qid=1616505733&sr=8-1

[@AbulkalamAzad-qz1vv]

perfect gentleman and unbiased

[@alexagudo9756]

the most profound explanation

[@walkerjobe6964]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5e0Y5WhhJ2sbaM Not really.

[@InNazareth]

Love to watch and learn from your videos. May you have long and healthy life.

[@jonageskuland]

If Bahira was a known Christian munk, living before the muslim tradition of the origin of the Koran was establishment, then this story would fit this scenario quite well, both confirming to Christians that they should believe in Muhammed, AND that Muhammeds revelations are in a biblical tradition and line, thus it should be received by the Christians

[@samchandra8258]

Very well made, thank you Dr.

[@walkerjobe6964]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5e0Y5WhhJ2sbaM Really not well made.

[@MsP4ndu]

Your channel is cool mate.

[@johnbaljian295]

Please Refer to Father Zakariya Botros for deep information about how Monk Bahira is the writer of the most of quranic verses, he has good arabic sources about how he helped muhammed in creating quranic verses.

[@falkenvir]

Qur'an verses was sent pieces by pieces, and these revelations are often direct answers to questions on the spot to Muhammad pbuh, not sure how Bahira can help him unless telepathically.

[@johnbaljian295]

@@falkenvir We can find sources of the verses of the quran in different sources such as poems, old science books etc.. prior to islam and that''s a clear proof it is copied from them

[@adrianlasin574]

then monk bahira was allah

[@johnbaljian295]

@@adrianlasin574 Yes he was

[@christiangadfly24]

You should also do a video on Muhammad wandering away with his brother, the two angels appearing, pulling his heart out, cleaning it, and putting it back. His parents go and look for him. Reminded me of the Jesus story in Luke where he wanders away. Also Amina being told that she'll have a kid reminds me of the anunciation of Mary. And the story leading up to the birth of Muhammad's father with the well and the patriachish type figure who needed a sacrifice and wanted to sacrifice his son. (He ends up meeting with a sorceress who tells him to sacrifice camels and use divination and arrows to see how many to sacrifice). That story reminds me of the patriachs. Those would all be good videos.

[@sifu9683]

Very good subject indeed 👍 ; )

[@Eissara]

Monk Sergius (Sargis) B'Khira (a title not a family name meaning he who predicts) Most probably he was called that following what he had said in regards to Mohammed even though this story remains to be a legend. What we know about Sergius B'Khira is that he was banished from the church and he wanted to revenge and so came about the story with Mohammed. However, there are stories that that Sergius regretted what he had done and he wrote a letter admitting to his mistakes and asking for forgiveness.

[@adrianlasin574]

but the damage is done already, if the legend is true

[@God1stProductions]

This is what i have been saying all along about m. I would take it a step further and say that he learned the Torah and the Holy Gospels by Christians and Jews since he was traveler who knew the desert. So who used to travel in those days?? It was the Jews and the Christians and along on those long trip Christians and jews prob read and spoke about scriptures all day long. And those trips could take weeks if not months. and muhammed just listened and absorbed everything and later on claimed he had an revelation. But if you read the quran carefully you will see it is precisely a text of somebody who have heard it and remembered little bits here and there. Thats why the quran is so weak on times, places, names and events. Never goes into detail always give you just the basics little story like a kid who heard a tale 2 years back and is now asked to tell about it. Anyway thats my take on it and great work daniel like always thank you and may the Lord bless you and your family

[@byronlewis1330]

The Legend of Sergius Bahira is very interesting. I do remember reading this years ago, and thinking there appeared a more Muslim account/s and there appeared a more Christian account. If so, this might point to the account about Sergius having some truth to it- unless the Arabic accounts are Christian Arab accounts. What's more unless one believes Mohammed was truly a prophet; one must reason where he got his biblical and other Quranic stories from especially as Mohammed was known to be illiterate either in the sense of not reading or writing or in the sense of being previously ignorant of the scriptures- fascinating subject!

[@variantquran4505]

The Arabic word that is often taken as meaning illiterate is ummī. However, that is not the only meaning the word can carry. I believe it could also mean "of the people," in the sense of being a common man. Personally, I find it a little unlikely that a man who was engaged in the caravan trade had no ability to read or write, but I suppose it is possible. However, it is also worth noting that not being able to read or write would be somewhat inconsequential related to the delivery of an oral/recited text. Finally, in at least one place I noted in the Biography, I note that it is said that Muhammad wrote a letter. One could assume that this is not proof positive that he could write, because (for example) it could have meant that he had someone write the letter. But it does say (at least in translation... I have not checked the Arabic) that he wrote it.

[@TheJo201]

This was very interesting

[@ambassadorkees]

Wow. That was new to me. Both ways Islam is wrong: Either the story is a complete fabrication and Christians never acknowledged Muhammad as a prophet, or the story is true and the origin of the Quran is not with Mohammed and not by visions but it is something that was taught to him by a monk who liked to mimic the Bible. And he made a poor job of it.

[@beastbabyboss1005]

But Prophet Muhammad was illiterate and he can't know how to read and write, isn't it fascinating that an illiterate person in a desert prophesied things around 1400 years ago and its prophecy is getting real, And correction that the first Arabic Bible was written in 9th century 300 years after the death of prophet Muhammad,

[@ambassadorkees]

@@beastbabyboss1005 1. Illiterate doesn't equal dumb. 2. What prophecy is coming true? 3. Lots of biblical prophecies have already come true, the most important 3 being that: A Jesus came: "Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel." B The second: That Jesus shall die as atonement for all sin and be glorified: "he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him. 3He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. 4Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. 5But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. 6All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all. 7He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth. 8He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken. C The resurrection and ascencion: 10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. 11 Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fulness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore.

[@beastbabyboss1005]

@@ambassadorkees the body of pharaoh in late 19th century, establishment of Israel, Bedouin(arabs ) competing each other with high and tall buildings, destruction of mountains, turning desert into forest, cloud seeding, obesity, high cases of STD( sexually transmitted diseases), temperature warming, wild fires, high population, the conquest of the Constantinople, the Mongol invasion, Muslim conquest of Indian subcontinent,

[@ambassadorkees]

@@beastbabyboss1005 and what were the prophecies? Again the miracle of reinterpretation, like with Nostradamus?

[@beastbabyboss1005]

@@ambassadorkees Nostradamus prophecies were in 16 the century and prophet Mohammeds was 1400 year's ago, then?????? What are comparing

[@joeynanez9897]

Thank you brother God bless

[@ellismaytham456]

Good video. 👍

[@salwanbede2666]

The thing that I know is that Waraqa did not convert to Islam and some say he was a Christian while others say he was of the Hanifs who claim to be followers of Abraham

[@pobjedaistine2177]

He was ebionite christian

[@inquisitivemind007]

According to a contemporary of Ibn Ishaq www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1479816825/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_glc_fabc_65FW6PSWF1YWTB6W7J3S it wasn't even a Christian monk named Bahira now was the location where it happened in Busra, Syria 🇸🇾

[@alioptim]

Wraqa Ibn Nowfel died shortly after his only meeting with Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). He was Christian. But his statement was if he was young he would stand by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) when his own people will expell Prophet (PBUH). From the tradition of previous Prophets Wraqa knew that same prosecution will happen with Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and showed his willingness to believe and help the Messenger. So no question over that Wraqa did believe that Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was a true Messenger.

[@Legendkiller99]

It's a legendary story Muhammad never met Bahira

[@501Mobius]

Baḥīrā, certainly didn't get the peaceful part right.

[@tyh3120]

Surah 96 is supposed to be the first revelation of the Angel Gabriel to Muhammad. Yet, no mention of the Angel at all!

[@followerofchrist1630]

Christian Prince who is Arabic Christian, well-versed in Hadiths and Quran and whom no sheiks will debate said that Waraka, Mohammed’s uncle never converted to Islam.

[@kevinexmuslim1396]

The Muslims are so desperately looking for a confirmation among the Christians and churches and books related to Jews and Christians to give Mohamad a credibility. And why the name of this monk did not mentioned in Quran ? Or the event which happened on that time Mohamad talked about ants in his book but not about this prophecy . And Mohamad name on that time wasn’t Mohamad the name is a tittle given to him when he took power

[@thecure7880]

Muhammad is the incarnation of 3 people, namely Iyas ibn Qabisah Al Ta'i, the Prophet Mani (Manicheism) and Marwan ibn Hakam .. and the initiator is Abdul Malik ibn Marwan

[@John-qo6fs]

I can not stop laughing how desperate they are and we don't need attestation from MOMO or garbage KURAN.

[@John-qo6fs]

@Sadiq-Abdul Malik Sadiq brother grow up you are living in 21st century why can't you accept criticism? Take heart bro and learn how to respect opinions.

[@osmanfarouk4697]

@@John-qo6fs Haha, garbage you find in your book full of (porn) called sacred, accused of the prophets of filthiest morals ‎‏your bible is a book full of the lies of scribes , 40 of them "" and you cannot even give the name of ONE of them "" ‎‏then you have 55% attributed to PAUL "" a drunken murderer who told you to ABANDON the whole law that jesus came to fulfill ! ‎‏then along comes an english king , he throws out 7 whole chapters of the bible and then gave this to you and told you its from god ! ‎‏oh , do you know why he changed your whole religion ?? because he wanted to screw his illegal mistresses without reprocussion !! and oh ,, this king died of syphilis, a dirty STD !! ‎‏so , a drunken murderer , 40 scribes that you dont know , and king that died of a sexually transmitted disease !!! ‎‏you call this the Holy book ?? this book full of murder , incest , adultery , prophets sending their daughters out to be analy raped , sons sleeping wih their mothers , fathers sleeping with their daughters , wife stealing ,selliong your daughter to her RAPIST !!! ‎‏believe me i can carry on all day !! "" THIS Holy book "" ??? ‎‏the injeel was the SPOKEN WORD of the messiah , not a book ..... and jesus words make up Maybe LESS THAN 40 % of the bible !! ‎‏you have virtually NOTHING of the injeel ‎‏i want to know why your book of love tells you to kill innocent women and children , incest , adultery , wife stealing , rape ect ??? ‎‏explain why this nasty dirty filth is in your bible 😱😱😱😱😱

[@silveriorebelo8045]

@Zola FER muslims are well known for inventing numbers of massive conversions to Islam...

[@leonmcnair4615]

This has been out for a day, and for some reason I didn't get notified, although I'm subscribed?

[@leonmcnair4615]

I also keep getting Islamic ads

[@variantquran4505]

Be sure you also click the bell icon to receive notifications, and let me know if that does not help.

[@variantquran4505]

@@leonmcnair4615 I don't have control over which ads come up ... KZbin's algorithms must think the Islamic ads are relevant to viewers of these videos.

[@leonmcnair4615]

@@variantquran4505 Okay thanks. And thanks for the bell thing, I checked and noticed it wasn't selected at "all" notifications.

[@sopowae2189]

Thanks sir.

[@Kawitamamayi]

Dr Brubaker, Thank you for your balanced and humble approach to the topic of the legend of the monk Bahira. I certainly appreciate you background don Daniel, specifically the “Son of Man” reference Jesus uses befor Ciaphas. Did Jesus also reference Psalm 110 first verse in the same comment? “Here is the Lord 's proclamation to my lord: "Sit down at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool!" (Psalm 110:1) Is this important to the topic?

[@Basaljet]

Thankyou for this gentle presentation. Do you not subscribe to a much later date for the Book of Daniel being written retrospectively from the period when Seleucid/Early Roman persecutions were beginning to affect the Jewish people?

[@ejectedlol1070]

You had mentioned how the geography of the narrative was illogical I.e. traveling to the pseudo Mt. Sinia in relation to Syria. I am not sure about this and wanted to ask would it be more logical geographically if narrative was actually referring to the actual Mt. Sinia you had alluded to I.e. Jabal al lawz (see Galatians 4:25)?

[@HH-ss9vj]

I have one question that has been hunting me for a couple of years. Please bare with me. According to western scholars of Quran manuscripts, the Uthman quran has never been found. Many have claimed that the Birmingham, Paris, Sanaa, Istanbul, Kairo Hussein, Uzbek Quran are the Uthmantic quran that the Muslim tradition claim existed and was sent to different places around the Muslim nation. I’ve followed this debate closely and no scholar of Quranic manuscripts (Puin, Déroche, Asma, Lemsyah) etc has said that the folios/Quran we have today are the uthmanic manuscript. If all these scholars can come to this conclusion that we don’t have the Uthamnic manuscript or some folios from it then they would be able to tell when they have found the uthmanic manuscript. They should know what to look for. What will they look for that confirms that they have found the uthmanic manuscript? Is it the hijazi rasm that is leaning to right? I’ve understood it can’t be in the Kufic style. According to scholars there were two different system of letters in the Arabic peninsula. One in the north (Arabia Petra) that was influenced by the Syriac language and one in south (Arabia deserta) that was influenced by the Ethiopian letters. Would the the uthmanic quran be written in the south or north style of writing? If the Quran was written in hijaz region then it should be in the south style of writing. Because the Syriac influenced style of writing was done in north(shem). If you and your colleagues are able to conclude that no one of the existing mus’haf and folios are the uthmanic quran than you must be able to know how the uthmanic quran should look like and what to look for. What would you look for? I hope you understood my questions. I’m just a layman and English is not my first language. Thank you for your time.

[@noork2938]

HH there never was an Uthmanic Quran, this is a half truth because by the time Uthamn was Caliph 25 years AH muslims were in North Africa. You are following fake Sunni History. Take a look at Shia Islam

[@HH-ss9vj]

@@noork2938 I’m following my mind. What does the Shia say about the quran? There is one quran that is said to belonged to Ali. From what I understand it’s the same Quran we have today.

[@adrianlasin574]

i think uthman accidentally burned all of them or maybe his followers were idiots that they burned all of them. or maybe they are with allah now

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

The believers was what Christians was called for many decades before Christians was used. Explore the oldest 28 Quran verses known . What's thought to be the oldest dated. It seems like it means Christians not Muslims. Later it appears to have been changed to mean Muslims . Its odd changes

[@m005kennedy]

Thanks for this video

[@wmarkfish]

Bahira is undoubtedly crazy and fancied himself as a Danial, Ezekiel and John who has a false vision on the false Sinai. Did Bahira live before or after Mohamad, or maybe he was a time traveler. It is much easier to prophesy things that have already happened; or things that were imagined to happen.

[@antoinelawrence9052]

So you think what's crazy is you believe in the bible every word that has so many contradictions and some false prophecies . It's amazing people are still Christians. Which most are so in love with blood and eating flesh. And you believe that . It's crazy and you doubt him being a Prophet . Get real

[@alimaclean5777]

Mount Sinai is in the Sinai peninsula. Exodus 3 locates the mountain only 3 days walk from Goshen. So that leaves Mount Sinai nowhere near Saudi Arabia

[@ohana_is_family]

Since Bahira was a Nestorian I have always wondered if Muhammed may have been influenced by a non-triniterian.

[@user-yz1dl3eu8l]

Nestorians are trinitarians.

[@ohana_is_family]

@@user-yz1dl3eu8l Are you sure? Wikipedia says Jesus is both human and divine. "Nestorian Mariology rejects the title Theotokos ("God-bearer") for Mary, thus emphasizing distinction between divine and human aspects of the Incarnation. Nestorian Christology promotes the concept of a prosopic union of two natures (divine and human) in Jesus Christ,[3] thus trying to avoid and replace the concept of a hypostatic union. "

[@user-yz1dl3eu8l]

@@ohana_is_family I am sure. There is trinity but with another pattern than Chalcedonian. Quranic Christology have no Trinity an have nothing to see with the Nestorian one which considers that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God and the Incarnation of his Word which is the contrary of the Quranic one. Now; that between Chalcedonians and Nestorian there are differences, of course. But what they reunite them is far more important than what they separate them. Nestorians are Christians. Muslims are?

[@novazemlja2921]

@@user-yz1dl3eu8l Nestortians aren't Christians, a sect yes but definitely not Christians.

[@user-yz1dl3eu8l]

@@novazemlja2921 Yes they are. Definitely.

[@issamelias1747]

Dear Dr. Brubaker, as an ex Egyptian of Coptic origin & belief, but living in Europe since ages, I‘d like to inform you that the legend of Behera ( that‘s how its pronounced in Arabic) is a well known story and is generally accepted as a fact that he was the one who gave i.e transmitted & taught Mohammed the Koran. If you would contact the Coptic Church in your area that might be of great help to you, since, as I said, this story is well known in Egypt, especially to the Coptic Christians.

[@sidprice6214]

comical

[@osuclassof88]

[3:184] But if they reject you (O Muhammad), so indeed were rejected before you messengers who came with clear arguments and scriptures and the illuminating book.

[@Kuudere-Kun]

I personally don't think the figure Al-Kindy calls Sergius should be identified with the Bahira of earlier Muslim sources, but rather his role in that narrative is more chronologically analogous to Waraqah ibn Nawfal.

[@EndingSimple]

Yeah, 1st Samuel 16 is what came to my mind too as you were reading about Bahira. Lots of appropriation from other more well know sources. David Wood just released another video where fun is made of the writer of the Koran's tendency to make historical figures say things they didn't say, like he was using them as hand puppets for his own benefit.

[@sebassanchezc-1379]

EXCELLENT VIDEO 👌

[@walkerjobe6964]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5e0Y5WhhJ2sbaM Not really excellent.

[@المسيح-ل1ض]

It all started there!

[@b0ys0l09]

Awesome!

[@mememe1468]

Valentin tomberg! When ya gonna make another book? I thought you were dead😂

[@yyunus9967]

Why did Bahira approach the prophet in the first place? He must had realised that that special boy would become the last prophet as foretold by previous prophets.

[@audhildbenjaminsen665]

If I don't remember wrong a blind priest/scholar blessed the Jesus child and praised the Lord he was fortunate to live and meet the Messias.This monk Bahira resembles the story of the Jesus child.Muhammad is said to be twelve years old when this monk "appointed" him to be a prophet,Jesus was twelve years when he "lectured" the priest in the Temple,the Christian litterature does the same to Jesus as the monk did to Muhammad,testifying that Jesus surely is a holy person.

[@Hypatiaization]

You got that book by Barbara Rogema

[@elissalabellelabelle4819]

I have wanted to buy this book for a long time but it’s $500.

[@variantquran4505]

Yes, that is the problem with Brill, for sure.

[@paghal11]

One can imagine a meeting between the Prophet Muhammad (reportedly aged 12) and a Christian monk living in Bostra (Syria), on a trading mission with his uncle Abu Talib. One would imagine that the monk must have been no younger than 30. Probably a good bit older. This account related in the book asks us to believe that the monk was able to secretly travel to Mecca (or Medina), a distance of at least a thousand miles across a harsh desert landscape, between the ages of 58 and 81 years old, likely older, without anyone else knowing. In real time. The Prophet's revelations were often almost instant (not always). See Surah Abasa (reportedly delivered in full form minutes after his interaction with the blind Bedouin man). Delivered in a form only a native speaker of the Quraishite Arabic dialect could have possibly crafted. And delivered to an illiterate man whose life was lived, almost to a fault, in full public view. The Qur'an itself refers to such unfounded accusations in its text. As a Christian apologetic, this one is really desperate! I'm a little embarrassed actually for anyone who buys this laughable account. As to the existence of the meeting with Bahira in the Prophet's childhood, it is neither needed nor in any way central to the Prophet's mission and message.

[@kayyad]

this is a good intro. Although it seems this has no bearing on the Prophecy of M. For multiple reasons: 1. Authenticity is yet to be established. And I don't mean the existence of Bahira, but his actual role and what is that really took place. 2. Bahira clearly would have rather avoided the incident to protect the Christians, why did he entertain any support. Unless he truely believed he was a prophet to be, which also entertains the reason why would that happen. 3. The narrative of M should have been more inline with Bahira's own beliefs. however, it seems to falsify and call out descrepencies in Bahira's beliefs. 4. The age they met is problematic in terms of a twelve year old (most likely) having to fully grasp all the details and the whole message. 5. In any case as mentioned it will be nice to have further studying of these questions and Bahira in general. Thanks

[@almazchati4178]

The source of Bahira story could be a Christian revert who knew him.

[@faisalwho]

Thank you Dr. B for the great analysis. I agree that these sound like stories thrown around for polemic purposes (by both sides). Shaykh Yasir Qadhi is also of the opinion that the story of Buhaira is likely false for a couple of reasons (that I recall): 1) Abu Talib never brings it up or talks about it after Muhammad (peace be upon him) declares prophethood, nor does our prophet mention it to any of his companions. 2) Others would have noticed the clouds shading our prophet and trees bending over to shade him, but there is no recounts of it.

[@iranianskeptic]

3) Abu Talib never converted to Islam, he always supported his nephew but never accepted his prophethood.

[@faisalwho]

@@iranianskeptic right, but what I’m saying is if Buhaira told him about Muhammad’s prophethood, why didn’t it come up later in his conversations with our prophet down the road? There should have been some mention of it somewhere else in the seera.

[@jackmule1572]

You(variant quran) are doing good job, hope islamist will not attack.

[@Eissara]

The first print of الرحيق المختوم was in 1976. The Islamic books specifically the Quran, Sira and ahadeeth when translated, the words which in Arabic are violent or show hatred are all translated differently for non Arab readers for example the word Kafir which means infidel is translated as disbeliever. Hence, anyone who does not read Arabic will not know the real meaning of the words nor how they are used vis a vis Jews and Christians. The translators are in their majority Muslims so they have the obligation to present what they write in an acceptable manner even if they are dishonest.

[@maniyembe]

Islam borrowing typology from Christianity in the story of Bahira , Mohammad and David

[@DWAGON1818]

Can you suggest a book about the real Bible. Any study that could point towards what Jesus actually said.

[@allahallah9325]

(110) And they say: None entereth paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian. These are their own desires. Say: Bring your proof (of what ye state) if ye are truthful. (111) Nay, but whosoever surrendereth his purpose to Allah while doing good, his reward is with his Lord; and there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve. (112) And the Jews say the Christians follow nothing (true), and the Christians say the Jews follow nothing (true); yet both are readers of the Scripture. Even thus speak those who know not. Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that wherein they differ.

[@Ghredle]

Would you identify synonymously Mount Moses with Mount Sinai? In German the term Mount Sinai is rather a modern spill over form the English narratives.

[@gavinjames1145]

I'm surprised that you (Dr. Brubaker) didn't also reference Quran 16:103, The Bee, in which people suggest that Muhammad is taught by a man, whom the Quran dismisses because the man does not speak Arabic(!). According to Abbas-Tanwir al-Miqbas min Tafsir Ibn 'Abbas the man was Jabr and/or Yasar and spoke Hebraic/Syriac. And according to Jala-Al-Jalalayn the man was a Christian blacksmith.

[@mrenigma1564]

if bahira teached mohamad then why he did not teach him to say jesus is LORD and why he did not teach him about the trinity ? i think this is fake

[@squarecircles4846]

There are writings that bahira was a heretic arian/nestorian who had been exiled, which may explain why he didnt teach muhammed that Jesus was Lord but yet believed in the pre-existent(though not eternal) nature of the Logos,

[@Alessandra07]

🙏🙏

[@allahallah9325]

Of the Jews there are those who displace words from their (right) places, and say: "We hear and we disobey"; and "Hear what is not Heard"; and "Ra'ina"; with a twist of their tongues and a slander to Faith. If only they had said: "What hear and we obey"; and "Do hear"; and "Do look at us"; it would have been better for them, and more proper; but Allah hath cursed them for their Unbelief; and but few of them will believe.

[@khadijahaiysah6934]

i just realize how handsome u r even in ur old age

[@amm6838]

Bahira=light in Syriac

[@alexanderv7702]

Muslims claim that it was a Christian that proclaimed their prophet; this before Jibril (Gabriel)!

[@saimasyed7317]

No one was harmed in the times of Prophet Mohammad. Look at Palestine 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

[@hafizhasnainashraf3565]

U should have to say Prophet MUHAMMAD peace b upon him whenever u are reciting His name.or atleast Prophet Muhammad

[@variantquran4505]

Thank you for the comment and I commend your desire to show respect for one whom you believe to have been a prophet, but I am not a believer in him and this is a place for academic discussion. You are welcome here and I hope that you find the discussion helpful.

[@mynamealehandero]

This monk bahira was mentioned in the story wrote by Ibn Ishaq. And what brubaker failed to mention was whether the story is authentic or not. Imam Al Zahabi, one of the great scholars of hadith said in his book Tarikh Al Islam ; the story about bahira and the prophet Muhammad was very problematic in terms of its Isnad or narration and it was not historically accurate. Ibn Ishaq did not mention any narrator or source from which he had received the story. Rather he wrote himself that he had taken the information of the story from people whose names he has not disclosed. Ibn Ishaq is a good storyteller, but not branded as trustworthy in terms of hadith narration. This was confirmed by many Great Hadith Scholars such as Imam Al Bukhari, Ibn Taimiyah, Imam Malik and Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. Im not surprised this story was brought up again and again by the western orientalist such as mr brubaker here. Islamic scholars has already answered similar allegation towards the Prophet. This is all lies, and the lies was already answered beautifully. You guys dont have any brand new idea to go against Islam? Try again lol

[@frankjaeger9068]

'You guys dont have any brand new idea to go against Islam? Try again lol'' ..... we all know that Muslims are ashamed of their own sources lol

[@mynamealehandero]

@@frankjaeger9068 authentic hadith and the perfect preserved quran from the times of the prophet? Nothing to be ashamed of.

[@frankjaeger9068]

@@mynamealehandero lol Holes in the narrative, here is a perfect video AGAIN all from your own sources kzbin.info/www/bejne/d3_SZ5eOmJecY5I

[@mynamealehandero]

@@frankjaeger9068 and who said that? One of the great scholars of Islam?

[@frankjaeger9068]

@@mynamealehandero who cares? you reject your own sources because they are embarrassing you do this with scholars and hadith

[@almazchati4178]

It looks to me that this story could have emerged only after the Prophet's death. There is normally more than two people in a trade caravan, for protection and for caring the animals and the cargo. If he was identified as a coming prophet by a monk, it is a good news for the trading folks of Kuraish. If he had a sign in his back, that would settle any uncertainties about his identity. The Kuraish would immediately gather around their selected son. No such thing happened. I am not sure of any other source who saw the sign, or what may have prompted the monk to make an inspection of prophet's body. The monk could not be Christian either, who were not expecting a followup Jesus. He must be Jewish. Anyway, this story must have come about after his death, when it was not possible to inspect the sign. Furthermore, the monk would join the caravan and be with the selected one, rather than looking for Mount Sinai looking for signs, while the sign is in front of him. This story is probably made up to encourage Muslim conversions. There is no scholparship worth anything in this fellow's arguments.

[@brianpeter9731]

I just wanted to ask you are you a believer in Jesus Christ has your lord and saver just wondering

[@allahallah9325]

(5) And when Jesus son of Mary said: O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a messenger who cometh after me, whose name is Ahmed. Yet when he hath come unto them with clear proofs, they say: This is mere magic.

[@LeavingIslam]

😊

[@10forthebigguy]

Islam is all based on legends and fairytales!!!

[@carllindahl8232]

Wait, do you believe Ron Wyatt about where ”the real” Mt Sinai is located? How come? Are there any more of Wyatts claims that you believe?

[@variantquran4505]

I'm open on the matter and well aware that traditional sites are not always the actual sites. I did not pay attention to who produced the material that I saw a number of years ago, but in terms of physical evidence, the archeological remains (e.g. apparent altar and inscriptions, etc.) at the base of the mountain in N. Arabia were compelling to me. This is exactly what one would expect to find around the real Mt. Sinai (and I do not use quotation marks, because whether it is that one or another, I believe somewhere is the actual Mt. Sinai). It would be odd, in fact, unless looted or carried off to a museum, to not find such evidence around Mt. Sinai, because certainly the people would not have carried a heavy stone altar with them on their onward journey through the desert ... they would have left it behind. But as to alternate alleged sites of the mountain, I confess I have not similarly weighed the evidences in their favor. I remain open to evidence in everything.

[@carllindahl8232]

Thank you for your answer. I suggest you take a new look at that video you watched some years ago. It isn’t done by scholars or any serious archeologists, at least not if it is the youtube-video I think it is. The petroglyphs they show in the video of different bovine creatures can be found allover the place in northern Saudi Arabia, and was quite common in the neolithic period. They are not made by israelites during exodus.