Why Have NO Dinosaur and Human Fossils Been Found Together?

[@JoshKenedy-w4x]

It is a wonderful blessing from God that we still have rothers and sisters in Christ who are willing to stand upon the firm foundation of God's word and defend it's truthfulness without compromise. The Lord bless and keep you and your ministry.

[@JamesBach-hz1pc]

Lower house Christians Are more interested in the here after than the marvelous creation of the hear and now. And joining in GODS GAME

[@davegillman6296]

Or are you to brainwashed to understand reality

[@shaerobbins4924]

@@JamesBach-hz1pc You don't even know what you're talking about, just your speculation and biasness

[@bamboo1763]

its concerning that people with power to influence what policies are made can be this delusional.

[@RaySanders-vp2ql]

@@bamboo1763 No human and dinosaur fossils have been found together because the dinosaurs died out millions of years before humans evolved. Trying to prove the Bible with this kind of nonsense is why young people are leaving religion.

[@Doc-Holliday1851]

"why don't we see human and dinosaur fossils together?" would you live next to dinosaurs?

[@Doc-Holliday1851]

@@joefriday2275 I'm afraid I don't understand the question.

[@arcguardian]

​@@joefriday2275either way it's an argument from silence, so it carries little to no weight. I'm not gonna lie though, finding them together would be ground breaking, but it is by no means necessary.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@arcguardian No data means we don't know. It does NOT mean that any particular religion must be true. But we have found a LOT of dinosaur fossils, and not a single one is from more recently than 65 million years ago.

[@statutesofthelord]

@@jockyoung4491 jocky, since Jesus spoke this earth into existence roughly 6,000 years ago, the probability that any fossil is 65 million years old is zero. Why not just repent of your parroting of lies, and receive eternal life with Jesus?

[@jockyoung4491]

@@statutesofthelord You are welcome to your faith. Others disagree. I hope you can respect that.

[@Doc1855]

When Mt Saint Helens blew in 1980, it took 9 hours for things to be changed that scientists had said in the past that it would have taken millions of years to do. After that eruption it put the scientists on notice that they’ve been wrong.

[@sciencerules2825]

No it didn't. What a ridiculous claim. MSH didn't change our understanding of geology or biological evolution one iota.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@joefriday2275 No it didn't. Why do you keep repeating this same lie over and over?

[@Doc1855]

@@joefriday2275 I dont doubt that. The earth has been around for billions of years. The Bible says that the earth was Void and without form. God raised the earth (land) out of the oceans during Creation.

[@Doc1855]

@@sciencerules2825 You can believe whatever you want because God gave mankind a Freewill. I read what I stated in a scientific journal. So not everyone agrees with your logic.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@Doc1855 You obviously didn't understand what you read. The lahar from MSH carved a 50' channel which some people call the "little Grand canyon" because it *superficially* resembles the real 2 mile deep Grand Canyon. The geology of how the two were created remains entirely different.

[@JP-nr1ty]

I am so happy to have come across Answers in Genesis. Their reasoning and calm informative presentation style is truly amazing. I was a college teacher for 35 years and this guy is Top Notch. Thank you for putting this together.

[@bufordghoons9981]

The stegosaurus carving at the Ta Prohm temple in Cambodia is evidence of humans living with dinosaurs but this evidence is dismissed. Likewise, if human and dinosaur bones were found together, some sort of far-fetched willy-nilly excuse would be fabricated to explain how human and dinosaur bones came to be mixed together. "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." --Luke 16:31 Here, Jesus is demonstrating that those who refuse to believe in God and obey his commandments, they are so blinded and pig-headed that no amount of evidence will change their minds. No amount of evidence will persuade a godless person whose faith is in Evolution the truth of the Gospel, any more than they would be persuaded if someone came back from the dead and told them God is real.

[@spatrk6634]

its dismissed because its not a stegosaur. if stegosaur was alive when humans were, we would have a lot more carvings of them instead of horses.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@spatrk6634 or..... Horses were alive at the same time as the Stegosaurus. Tell me this. How did they get such an accurate depiction of a Stegosaurus if it didn't exist at that time?

[@spatrk6634]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 its not. for once its head is huge on the carving and no neck. stegosaurs had long neck and small head.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@spatrk6634 it may not be 100% accurate for the liking of a paleontologist but it is obviously a stegosaurus. Undeniably so. The picture tells it all.

[@spatrk6634]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 its not a stegosaur at all. why would they carve stegosaurs wrong but other animals that are still around today are not wrongly carved? if stegosaur was walking around at their time it would be 100% accurate

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

It's always best to trust the Bible. Science is always changing because humans don't know everything. God's word doesn't change. He hasn't let me down so far. I don't think that's going to change.

[@earthisasphere]

"God's word doesn't change." Then why were verses added to Mark and John 200 years after the original manuscripts were written?

[@Bomtombadi1]

You’re right! Let’s not learn anything and update our models of the world with new information. We’ll stick with your stupid book which gives profound insight such as blood is life.

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

@@earthisasphere what verses would you be talking about? Can you name them or are you just spouting words?

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

@@Bomtombadi1 yes......sounds good

[@MarSchlosser]

@@earthisasphere Of course you can prove that.

[@mccalltrader]

Because if you had monsters the size of houses…you don’t live near them….why aren’t lions and tigers found with humans…because we don’t live amongst them

[@samburns3329]

Why are human fossils and dino fossils found in strata dating a hundred million years apart?

[@jockyoung4491]

Most dinosaurs were small and humans almost certainly would have eaten them if they were available.

[@earthisasphere]

@@samburns3329 He doesn't know what a stata is. You just have to call it a "rock layer."

[@i7Qp4rQ]

@@jockyoung4491 How often do you find dog, cat, chicken bones at a graveyard?

[@RS54321]

@@samburns3329 'A hundred million years apart' is an assumption. Where are you getting this number from?

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

The Bible is right, darwin was wrong.

[@HS-zk5nn]

yup his theory is not even original. it was plagiarized from the brothers grimm

[@sunnydays8270]

​@HS-zk5nn so you believe creation theory is folklore? I think you need more faith to be an atheist. Can't prove evolution theory, and evolution scientists know it. That's why now to keep it alive they are writing 'new science' of evolution. It's all BS.

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@sunnydays8270 no, I am talking about darwins theory

[@sunnydays8270]

​@HS-zk5nn, was it? I didn't know that. Wow, it explains a lot

[@jockyoung4491]

@@sunnydays8270 Obiously not. HS is a dishonest troll.

[@marcandrewsmedoutagne9781]

The term dinosaurs is very recent. Before, dinosaurs were called dragons.

[@logicalatheist1065]

Prove it...

[@marcandrewsmedoutagne9781]

@@logicalatheist1065 A dragon is a massive, serpentine creature, often depicted with reptilian features. Its body is covered in tough, gleaming scales, which can range in color from deep reds, shimmering golds, and dark blacks, to vibrant blues or greens. The dragon's head is crowned with sharp horns. Its claws are razor-sharp, capable of slicing through stone or metal, and its long tail whips with deadly force. The dragon's mouth is lined with rows of sharp teeth. The description of dragons vary depending on the culture. But you'll see that the description of a dragon is similar to that of a dinosaur . Plus the term dinosaur is relatively recent. It was coined in 1842 by the British paleontologist Sir Richard Owen. He created the term from the Greek words "deinos" (meaning "terrible" or "fearsome") and "sauros" (meaning "lizard" or "reptile"), which together mean "terrible lizard." Before this, there was no scientific term to describe these prehistoric creatures, and people often misunderstood fossilized remains, attributing them to mythical beings.

[@venomousgas3300]

@@logicalatheist1065 Lol, every culture across the world has stories of them. How about this: Disprove it!

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@venomousgas3300 Mythology, Local floods. Done. Noah's flood was never shown to happen, it's just a story.

[@venomousgas3300]

@@logicalatheist1065 Ah, well done, demonstrating that you've done absolutely no research.

[@jugheadjones5458]

The Ark narrative doesn’t require “just so” events. Everything works logically and naturally.

[@Gek177]

Well, except for literally everything about the story.

[@earthisasphere]

Um, no... Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to form 13) the change in salinity levels would kill both freshwater and saltwater fish ,and on and on and on

[@richardgregory3684]

The alleged ark fails in dozens of ways and makes no sense.

[@mattdillon4398]

I love how all the atheists are here commenting on a video that they believe is completely impossible and doesn't follow science! Why? Are they trying to save people from belief in God so that they can die and turn into dirt? What is your point atheists?

[@samburns3329]

@@mattdillon4398 Mainly because we don't like when creationist clowns lie about scientific facts.

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16

[@Bomtombadi1]

Completely irrelevant to this thread!

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

@@Bomtombadi1 God's word is never irrelevant and this is a Christian channel. Don't forget.

[@cherrygummybear1132]

@@Bomtombadi1It’s the most relevant statement in history. I pray that you will understand that.

[@MarSchlosser]

@@Bomtombadi1 Actually you are the irrelevant one.

[@Bomtombadi1]

@@cherrygummybear1132 relevant according to you. Irrelevant to this conversation. Irrelevant to this video’s topic.

[@felixvecchiarelli6458]

Amen!! Keep teaching truth!!

[@logicalatheist1065]

He's not though, he's lying like always

[@felixvecchiarelli6458]

@logicalatheist1065 - Evidence-less one-liners! Nice work. Those are totally worth your time.

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@felixvecchiarelli6458 well if you knew anything about science you could EASILY tell he's lying, Stay ignorant.

[@noneyabidness9644]

​@@felixvecchiarelli6458his name always gives me a chuckle. I think he chose it for its irony.

[@felixvecchiarelli6458]

@@logicalatheist1065 - Sticking to the shallow answers? Respect for the perseverance.

[@williammcleroy558]

You never find hippo and human fossils together. We totally can't be living at the same time as them. 😂 Edit: Because sarcasm doesn't translate to text I have to inform that this was a sarcastic joke. Many think I am being serious. I am not.

[@earthisasphere]

Actually, we have. Homo erectus footprints have been found with hippo footprints in the Koobi Fora Formation, Kenya that date to about 1.5 MYA. As recently as 2018 children's footprints were found next to butchered hippo carcuses and footprints in Ethiopia. Do a little research before you post your nonsense next time.

[@paradiserestored6179]

😂

[@RaySanders-vp2ql]

Dinosaurs died out millions of years before humans evolved from chimpanzees.

[@williammcleroy558]

@@joefriday2275 lol

[@RaySanders-vp2ql]

@@joefriday2275 They deleted my post. What are they afraid of - the Truth?

[@Tuishimi]

I would say Calvin's strong point is shooting down arguments that are fired off to argue against biblical history.

[@earthisasphere]

His strong point is lying and his followers don't fact check him.

[@logicalatheist1065]

He's just a little pansy

[@droidtigger]

"history" that's been altered so many times that there isn't one unified interpretation.

[@Gek177]

@@Tuishimi is say his strong point is dressing like a dandy.

[@skywarp2414]

well, most likely the majority of dinosaurs got wiped out from a meteor. But there are ALWAYS survivors. But those survivors were outnumbered by the rising mammals. Noah, like any other human wanting to save endangered spicies got some dinos on his ark.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God bless you AIG 🙏🙏🙏✝️ appreciate your hard work in encouraging the saints

[@ffjsb]

What faith are you practicing, because it sure isn't Christianity...

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@ffjsb that's funny. 😅🙏✝️🕊️

[@ffjsb]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 Maybe you should actually read the Bible instead of finding emojis to use...

[@JKRoth-jh2im]

I’ve asked that question for years! No answers. I just started watching. I’m intrigued.

[@earthisasphere]

Get your science from scientists, not lying grifters like Calvin. Just do a quick fact check. He is never correct about science.

[@K-lINE-76]

I know I’m going to pass away one day,,, I’ll put my trust in the Bible,,, I want to go up not down….

[@earthisasphere]

Believe in a god if you wish. Plenty of people do that while still understanding the science is legit, but AIG certainly takes you "down".

[@flyingtime5501]

​@@earthisasphereClearly biased in every way, is not a good look for claiming "legit"!

[@Yiannis2112]

Wish what you like, you're going down. Six feet down.

[@flyingtime5501]

@@Yiannis2112 only the body. But as for you, well that would include the soul unless you were to realize your hatred n mistakes n change.

[@Yiannis2112]

@@flyingtime5501Prove your soul goes up, down, left or right.

[@ashbooth1817]

Excellent thought provoking video Calvin. I cannot wait for the next chapter in this series.

[@Gek177]

@@ashbooth1817 are you serious?

[@henrry889]

@@Gek177 All of this garbage is self-contradicting and hypocritical. They are constantly saying evolution is a "story" when the bible is exactly that, but full of supernatural events. Evolution is actually reasonable for theorizing.

[@rocketscientisttoo]

@@Gek177 So, how do you explain scientists finding red blood cells and soft tissue, that cannot survive longer than several thousand years in a perfect environment, in T-Rex bones that are supposedly 350 million years old?

[@Gek177]

@@rocketscientisttoo first of all the T-Rex didn't exist 350 million years ago. Secondly, you don't actually know what was found. So now do you explain being so ignorant that you don't know the supposed age of the specimen or the actual material that was discovered?

[@jockyoung4491]

@@rocketscientisttoo They did NOT find tissue that can't be preserved. They found degraded tissue inside the bone that had once been "soft tissue." We don't yet understand exactly what it is or how long it could be preserved or how, but we know that it is over 65 million years old. There is zero question about that

[@Mrmancan]

I would imagin it's like today why you don't find human and animal bones together but yet we clearly live with animals

[@earthisasphere]

Nothing today would be fossilized yet.... But yeah, we actually could. I have pet animals buried in my back yard. I could dig those up, and dig any plot in the local cemetery, and bam, humans and animals remains from the same strata...

[@vando6679]

Ya they are found together all the time. Ancient human remains have been found with animal bones that have been converted into tools.

[@mirandahotspring4019]

Plenty of human fossils have been found with animal fossils.

[@droidtigger]

​@@vando6679but never dinosaur bones. It's almost like they were seperated by millions of years 🤔

[@arcguardian]

​@@earthisaspheregood example. So the next logical question would be the following... Is it possible for organisms to coexist yet appear in different strata?

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

God's word can always be trusted over the word of man. 1 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

[@richardgregory3684]

How do you know it;s gods word? Oh yeah becuase it says it is lol

[@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n]

@@richardgregory3684 "please argue with me sempai"

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@richardgregory3684 if you don't want to believe it, nothing that anyone says can change your mind. God's word is there for any who will believe it. He will never force anyone to follow Him.

[@davidslone9776]

Don't waste your time on the close-minded. They will find out the truth, soon enough, from a source they can't make fun of.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@davidslone9776 let's just hope and pray they find out before it's too late

[@brycecampbell4845]

There are humans and dinosaur footprints together in Texas and other places as well.

[@susangonos589]

Why are there human footprints and dinosaur tracks side by side in New Mexico? Why are the drawings in mud flow of Fish, Mamoths, deer and other animals?

[@samburns3329]

_Why are there human footprints and dinosaur tracks side by side in New Mexico?_ Easy. There aren't.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Because fish, mammoths, deer are not dinosaurs?

[@howardf5264]

I would like to see these dinosaur and human foot prints in New Mexico. Can you provide a specific location?

[@jaymarr6012]

Exactly, they are known as trace fossils.

[@avgejoeschmoe2027]

@@samburns3329 halfwit, it is well documented, paluxy river in TX

[@davidslone9776]

One reason could be, the world-wide flood scattered every thing all over the place. Things that may have been close to the surface may now be at a lower level, and things buried deep may be close to the surface. That, plus, everything could be mixed up, and scattered all over the place. It was a world-wide flood, that according to the Bible, covered even the mountain tops. What happened around Mt. St. Helens, in 1980, is a short version of the devastation floods can bring, even one caused by a vulcanic explosion.

[@jockyoung4491]

That doesn't explain why different species occur in different rock layers spread across hundreds of millions of years.

[@logicalatheist1065]

There was no world wide flood, there's 0 evidence to suggest that

[@earthisasphere]

Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to form 13) the change in salinity levels would kill both freshwater and saltwater fish ,and on and on and on

[@davidslone9776]

@@earthisasphere yawn!!!

[@kevinkelly2162]

@@davidslone9776 How dare he interupt your ignorant speculation. You have a right to your fantasy about being clever

[@benpascua2192]

I use to believe in evolution until I met Jesus. Then I discovered he is the way, the truth and life. And God's word is perfect and true.

[@julau-v6x]

The bible doesn’t disprove evolution, it is not a scientific textbook

[@thatoneguybones8036]

He's also pretty good with a weed eater. I like him

[@avenger4027]

@@julau-v6x The Bible disproves evolution, for "evolution" is Hindu myth dressed in scientific-sounding terms for the West.

[@Skyfly1715]

Just.... how is Jesus the "way the truth, and the life"! I mean...what does that even mean?

[@feartheghus]

Where did you meet him and did he have a phone number or something I could use to contact him?

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

If the Bible is truly God’s Word, then we should cherish it, study it, obey it, and fully trust it. If the Bible is truly the Word of God, then it is the final authority for all matters of faith, practice, and morality. If the Bible is the Word of God, then to dismiss it is to dismiss God Himself. The fact that God gave us the Bible is an evidence of His love for us. God communicated to mankind what He is like and how we can have a right relationship with Him. These are things that we could not have known had God not divinely revealed them to us in the Bible. The Bible contains everything mankind needs to know about God in order to have a right relationship with Him.

[@neplatnyudaj110]

You do realize the Bible was written by people, right? What things we couldn't have known otherwise does it reveal?

[@aomana4357]

Why was the Bible written in such a language that no one now knows how to accurately translate it? Didn't god know this issue would come up?

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@neplatnyudaj110 first and foremost it reveals God's salvation plan. As a side note it gives us the history of the world.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@aomana4357 the Bible was written in Hebrew and Greek. They know how to translate it.

[@aomana4357]

@@IAMhassentyou-e7l I thought it was Aramaic, maybe not. But there is controversy in translation to English. English will soon be the universal world language. I think the Bible should've been written in English, non-metaphorically, and in a way not open for interpretation.

[@poliincredible770]

Powerful!

[@David-gh6vp]

Ignorant!!

[@bruceseals584]

They have been found together evolutionists cover up to avoid surrendering to God as the creator and facilitator of everything

[@KNIGHTFOX80]

Everyone keeps commenting against this using "physical proximity" to describe bones being "found together". When you are grouping things in archeology to time periods, you are looking at the different levels of the soil and rock. People don't seem to want to use their brains and have a lot of very weak and foolish arguments anytime the Bible is involved.

[@robertfrapples2472]

You can hear the banjo music in the background when you read their posts.

[@mikefranklin1253]

You mean your argument?

[@davidwhitton5519]

The geological column only exists in books, its never been seen in real life.

[@guylelanglois6642]

Thank you sir

[@Philip-w5l]

Believe the Word !!!🙏✝️🙏🕊️

[@Thruevangelisteyes]

Philip, amen ! And then what do we do ? Philip, I have an idea ! We tell others the Gospel. So are you ready to tell someone else about Jesus ? 🙏🏼🎶

[@venomousgas3300]

I remember dinosaur footprints being found alongside human footprints. When the discovery was sent to be studied (I forget who made the discovery, and who it was that it was sent to in order to be studied).. The person that received the footprints destroyed them and said it was inconclusive. Sorry for the vagueness, it has been a long time since I last read about it.

[@richardgregory3684]

Yah, they were fakes.

[@venomousgas3300]

@@richardgregory3684 If they were fakes, why destroy them and claim they were inconclusive? If they were fake, and they were sent off to be studied, I would think that they would be shown to be fakes, and not simply destroyed and called inconclusive.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@venomousgas3300 Oh no, the actual ones were fakes. The ones in your story never existed because that never happened. There were soem supposed human footprints alongside dinosaur ones - they were carved by Christian fundies.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@venomousgas3300 You have been told a story that may or may not be true about someone "intentionally" destroying them. I don't see that it matters, because we know objectively that non-avian dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago.

[@samburns3329]

That whole story is 100% creationist fabrication. A creationist claimed to have found human/dino tracks then had other creationists "destroy" them so no one could ever verify the story.

[@MikeMarley-r9s]

Nothing science can say or so all prove will convince me of evolution.For I know my Redeemer Lives.

[@simpleiowan3123]

Jesus never said evolution wasn't a thing. This is an extrapolation and misinterpretation of some of the most archaic stories that well pre-date the Bible. You put too much stock in them being "true" or "false." Leave science to scientists...some things can both be true at the same time.

[@Thruevangelisteyes]

Mike , amen . Now Mike it’s our turn. So are you ready to tell someone else about Jesus ? 🙏🏼🎶

[@julau-v6x]

How does Jesus being raised from the dead disprove that god perhaps created this cool thing in genes called mutation?

[@IluzjaRecords]

Thanks!

[@waiagaming]

❤❤

[@davidburch3863]

Dear Editor, those multiple bright white transitions burn my eyes.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

One thing you have to consider is how many humans were alive during the flood? Then think about how much land there is on earth and how rare it is to even find a fossil. To find a fossil of a human during the flood period is highly unlikely, in my opinion .

[@earthisasphere]

Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to form 13) the change in salinity levels would kill both freshwater and saltwater fish ,and on and on and on

[@logicalatheist1065]

The biblical event never happened, it's mythology. Science doesn't support it 1 bit

[@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n]

@@earthisasphere bros just copy pasting now lol

[@droidtigger]

​@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0nbecause it's the correct answer to all of your "points".

[@jockyoung4491]

@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n I agree that copying large blocks of text can get annoying, but he does make good points.

[@Charlie94781]

It is strange how that chaotic disaster sorted out the flora and fauna in distinct layers rather than a jumbled mess

[@avgejoeschmoe2027]

there IS a jumbled mess, look into the Hanson Bone Bed out west

[@earthisasphere]

@@avgejoeschmoe2027 There are many examples of regional flooding throughout earth's history, and the Hanson Bone Bed may be explained by a flood, but it wasn't Noah's flood. We should see that mess world wide and in the same strata if there was indeed a world wide flood... but we don't.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

@@Charlie94781 Yes, hydrodynamic sorting has no predictive value, but AIG scientists are working on it.

[@skydriver5709]

@@earthisasphere Sediment layers very quickly in water. Go scoop up some dirt and river mud in a jar and wait a month. You'll get layers based on weight and density of the material. Remove the water and let it dry, they'll stay in those layers and harden. That's just small level experimentation, but it's completely recreatable and repeatable. Two things critically necessary for science. Avoid "science" that skips recreatable and repeatable results through experimentation, b/c it skips the scientific process and is therefore, not science.

[@skydriver5709]

@@earthisasphere It's pretty clear that the rapid melting of ice during the Younger Dryas period would have caused much more than "regional" flooding. It likely covered hundreds of miles (some areas thousands of miles) of coastline and flooded all rivers, which is where all Earth's early civilizations would have existed. There's geological evidence for this around the world about 11,700 years ago. It likely would have wiped out almost all of the world's human population (99% would have lived within a mile of water), and reset mankind, which is basically what the premise of Noah's Ark is about. Genesis isn't "historical narrative". It's the only book of the bible that isn't. Pre-Moses, it was a collection of mythological stories, based on true events, told through elaborate mythological stories.

[@jeannine1739]

Well done! Off to watch the first one. :)

[@Thruevangelisteyes]

Jeannine, amen ! Now it’s our turn. So Jeannine, are you ready to tell someone else about Jesus ? 🙏🏼🎶

[@jeannine1739]

@Thruevangelisteyes As often as a disabled shut in can. I'm so thankful for the internet. :)

[@hdsamte]

The same reason noone would find my bone next to a tiger's or Lions' after 500 yrs.

[@Thruevangelisteyes]

Warrior, that was a good answer. Now it’s our turn. So are you ready to tell someone else about Jesus ? 🙏🏼🎶

[@JamesPatterson-gb9et]

But I have a statement to make that people who love truth can understand. Not one of these so called scientists can produce a shred of evidence that proves evolution to be anything more than a theory.

[@earthisasphere]

You do know what a scientific theory is, right? Science isn't in the business of proving things, that would math. Science does require evidence, massive amounts of it, to support it's laws and theories (laws are note even "proven", just supported by evidence). So while you are technically correct, Evolution is the most well supported theory of all time. To falsify it, you are going to need a lot of really good evidence yourself.

[@curseddeity6379]

a theory is based on evidence

[@Steven-p3e6r]

​@@earthisaspherenot entirely true. The number 7 is the number of creation. The number 9 is the continuation of all life by Horus and that continuation is seen mathematically. Are you aware of what is special about number 9? The canopic jars are 4 types of humans created after Horus mated with the females of each jar. Osiris is the creator and when Set killed him, his heart spiritually worked thru Horus which gave Horus the power to create

[@animalsaroundus2]

@@earthisasphereevolution is definitely not well supported. There are so many holes in the theory that the more we progress In time the less validity it holds. The fossil record doesn’t support it-we have no examples of transition species. Archaeopteryx only shows examples of a bony tailed bird, still a bird. And you can bring up the like four other examples the evolutionist like to grasp onto, but they have all been debunked at this point in time. Mutations are almost always harmful, not progressive. Fossilization requires rapid sediment deposition, which means it could not have occurred over a long period of time. This would compromise the integrity of a fossil. Also, the fossil record shows us an abrupt appearance of fully developed species, not a slow transitional appearance- which is not supported by the theory of evolution. We now know that the universe most definitely started at a single point and is expanding. This proves that time, space, and matter all came into existence at the same time and ultimately disproves all lot of the beliefs from the secular side that the universe is just trillions of years old. That’s more of a math thing though, not evolution. It’s really just logical to believe that evolution falls short of explaining our origin. We see examples of micro evolution in our time, but never macro evolution and if evolution were true we would need to see thousands if not millions of evidences for macro scale evolution.. but we just don’t.

[@curseddeity6379]

@@earthisasphere do you have a single instance of evolution creating anything new that wasn't in the DNA before? What i have found is that evolution merely removes unfavorable traits, it never adds anything

[@jannyjt2034]

@9:00. Correct. It's story telling posing as science. It's objective that such fossils exist but theories are story telling. It's interesting that people ignore the proof of the remains of Noah's arc in turkey, discovered by Ron wyatt.

[@pomegranatepip2482]

People don’t ignore Ron Wyatt. He has been proven to be a fraud. From Wikipedia…. “Wyatt's claims have been described as "fraudulent",[2] in "the category of trash which one finds in tabloids such as the National Enquirer",[3] and been criticized by scientists, historians, biblical scholars, and some creationists. They are not considered credible by professional archaeologists and biblical scholars.” Note the bit about “and biblical scholars”…..

[@africasummarized3456]

Human and dinosaur bones paired together isn’t the important question. Were Human remains and Dinosaurs ever in the same strata/layer or dated contemporaneous with one another. There are plenty of species that aren’t found together who lived in the same time period.

[@earthisasphere]

These people are too indoctrinated to attempt to learn anything.

[@davidbutler1857]

And the answer to that is that humans nor dinosaurs are found in the same layers, anywhere.

[@carlhovadina7299]

I do wonder how scientist came to the conclusion that layers equals years. I'm going to do some research on that.

[@davidbutler1857]

@@carlhovadina7299 before radiometric dating the simple idea was that layers were composed of regular deposits over time, which was correct of course, except that the composition or amounts of material will depend on conditions. A coastline might see regular deposits over millennia but a simple change in sea levels means the regular deposits stop and the next layers may take a long time to deposit some other material like organic remains or volcanic ash, or floodwater sediments over spilling a nearby river or lake. Stuff that takes millions of years to accumulate since they are quite rare. So a layer doesn’t mean years so much as periods of conditions.

[@davidbutler1857]

This is why the Petroleum Industry maps out various types and extents of sediments to model the shape of an oil trap or ‘play’ and they’ll date the rock layers via core drilling to figure out relative ages of the sediments which helps them figure out where the oil might move once tapped and the extent of it in various areas since some sediments are porous and others are not

[@RodericGurrola]

Nice video 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻. Good research. Also like the videos with the animals my favorite part.

[@Bomtombadi1]

This isn’t fuqing researched. It’s not even reasoned.

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@Bomtombadi1 getting a bit angry there, boms. Upset that we aren't listening to you?

[@Bomtombadi1]

@@zerosteel0123 you people don’t listen because you’re dishonest.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@Bomtombadi1 😂 ok. Whatever you say, man.

[@Bomtombadi1]

@@zerosteel0123 more ego protection

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

The Bible, unique among books, has transformed countless lives and swayed whole cultures. After looking at the evidence, one can say without a doubt that God has spoken and that, yes, the Bible is truly God’s Word.

[@richardgregory3684]

Unique among books? The same is true of the Quran, the Hindu Vedas, the Buddhist Tripitaka - and then there are the works of Marx, Plato's Republic, the philosophies of Tzun Tzu, or scientific books like Newton's Principia, Darwin's Origin of Species, or Adam Smiths Wealth of Nations.

[@kevinkelly2162]

Your unique book is based on other Babylonian myths.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@richardgregory3684 there is no book like the Bible.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@kevinkelly2162 it really isn't. It is the written word of God.

[@kevinkelly2162]

@@IAMhassentyou-e7l So why is Genesis based on the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Enuma Elish and it contains bits taken word for word from the Code of Hamurabi? Coincidence? All these sources are earlier than even the oldest estimates for your Bible.

[@bookofrevelation4924]

I remember pressing leafs between pages of heavy books, fossils remind me of such pressing by pressure to flatten perfectly in place, then I'm reminded that similar pressure is needed to make crude oil and diamonds. So, why wouldn't or couldn't all these things be made at the same time by same event?

[@wizzardofpaws2420]

Also, we haven't excavated every square inch of the earth either.

[@earthisasphere]

But we have over 11,000 dino specimen, and not a single human specimen has been found in any strata even close to where those dino specimen were found.

[@davidwhitton5519]

​@earthisasphere what was the largest fossil ever found of one of the giant dinosaurs?

[@KaiyaCorrbin]

I loved this explanation. I'd never really thought about it before, even as a biological scientist myself. You also inadvertently taught me how to pronounce "coalecanth", too.

[@stephencrabb5123]

The same you dont find penguin's and polar bears together

[@rhondahasegawa2853]

Thank you for your videos!

[@therealwildwildwest]

My question is, 1 why no dinosaurs remains in human animal discards, like there is with out animals human ate. 2. No cave paintings of dinosaurs? An old earth believer

[@PrehistoricFarmsYT]

There are cave paintings of dinosaurs

[@Baryonyxwithwifi-z2p]

@PrehistoricFarmsYT and there are cave paintings of demons and pagan gods but I assume you don’t believe they were real?

[@AbuYonathan]

@@PrehistoricFarmsYT They're not

[@JS-sv4ol]

I’ve literally never considered this and find it very compelling

[@mikeclarke3954]

Thank you for the video. I knew it just because of difference of time to make a fossil confirms accounts of the biblical record. There must be records where man is with dinosaurs that are hidden.

[@mirandahotspring4019]

No, dinosaurs became extinct around 65 million years ago. Man only came on the scene between 350,000 and 260,000 years ago.

[@earthisasphere]

Yep, I have no evidence, so someone hid it from me...

[@statutesofthelord]

mike, there is a lot of evidence. Go look at the Ica Stones for a good start.

[@Gek177]

​@@statutesofthelordthe Ica stones? Like the known forgeries made by a poor farmer to supplement his income off of tourists?

[@earthisasphere]

@@Gek177 Multiple poor farmers, but yeah, these people are the reason they were able to sell those stones.

[@Doc1855]

The book of Job talks about dinosaurs living during that time.

[@jockyoung4491]

No it does not. It talks about big animals.

[@Bomtombadi1]

No, it doesn’t. Give us the passage.

[@badideass]

Epic fail

[@Doc1855]

@@Bomtombadi1 They are referred to as Giants. But when you take the word Giants back to the Hebrew, it’s talking about dinosaurs. Everything that I say on this channel, you want to argue. You have a narcissistic personality. People who are Narcissistic have a need to Always be right. They do not accept any other thoughts or ideas from others, as they are threatened if anyone else doesn’t agree or think exactly like themselves. Someone who has Narcissistic Personality Disorder has either been emotionally or physically abused, damaged. I’m sorry that you had to endure whatever you went through. If you would like, I can send you my professional information so that you can set up an appointment with one of the psychologists who are on my staff. I have a large company and am in 28 states within the USA. I will no longer continue to state my beliefs, because of your personal feelings or narratives.

[@Doc1855]

@@jockyoung4491 Look it up in Hebrew and Greek

[@randall1715]

We also have to taken into account fossils are created in a little as 24hrs. If you understand biology animal that died laying on the ground would be consumed by other animals, insects and fungi. Even bones would decay in time depending on environmental conditions. The fossils we find were mostly buried alive in seconds, not over hundreds of thousands of years.!!

[@FalconWing1813]

Also humans often move a body to a specific location to be buried. Where a wild animal is usually eaten by other scavengers.

[@Jewonastick]

How the fuq did humans move and bury all the flood victims if they were ALL killed?

[@earthisasphere]

This is actually a good argument against dino's and humans existing at the same time. There should be more human remains found if this was the case. The humans would cover the other humans more quickly, thus preserving them longer. More human fossils should occur if this happened.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

Amen AIG 🙏 God's word always proves true

[@earthisasphere]

So the value of Pi is 3? A bat is a bird? A mustard seed is the smallest seed?

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

Scorners may seek wisdom but cannot find it. One reason they cannot find wisdom is that they are already convinced of their own opinion. We cannot grow wise if we won’t learn from the wise (Proverbs 14:6). • Scorners refuse to learn from rebukes or mistakes. They keep doing the same dumb things over and over again (Proverbs 13:1). • Scorners are the source of strife and contention. When we get rid of the scornful, we have peace (Proverbs 22:10). • Scorners resent correction. They cause trouble for those who try to show them truth (Proverbs 9:7; 15:12). • Scorners are arrogant and haughty (Proverbs 21:24), which keeps them at odds with God because He “resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble” (James 4:6).

[@earthisasphere]

@@IAMhassentyou-e7l I was raised a YEC and in the cult for over 25 years before I finally got out. I have read the Bible cover to cover many times, which acutally helped me see the inconsistencies, contradictions, and nonsense in it. Don't give me bible versus that have no meaning...

[@earthisasphere]

@@IAMhassentyou-e7l You claimed it was infallible, I proved you wrong, get over it.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@earthisasphere you've disproven Christianity? The Bible? I hardly think so. You cannot defeat God. Try as you may. It's an unwinnable battle for you, my friend. He is the Almighty and the Judge of all.

[@leestockton9367]

I have met some teenagers where I could be quite convinced about their evolution from apes; based on how they behave 👍😂

[@chenyansong]

The key point is not whether we can find dinosaur and human fossil together, the key point is whether we can find them from same era, that is, whether we can find dinosaur and human fossil with similar C14/C12 ratio. If you can find C14 in dinosaur fossil than it can not possibly be 100 millions yrs old, if you can not find C14 in dinosaur fossil than it must be much older than YEC suggests

[@earthisasphere]

These people are to indoctrinated to try to learn anything.

[@rianahayes84]

Very interesting, thank you. When we went diving in the Comoros in 1984, we found a coelacanth washed up on the shore after a heavy storm out at sea. Fortunately, we believed in God's Word and His account of Creation and a young Earth of almost 6,000 years old. We had a chuckle because it was just another example of fossilized creatures not extinct, neither millions of years old.

[@d.columbia9603]

The mental gymnastics needed to buy this bs is hilarious

[@d.columbia9603]

@@joefriday2275 god of the gaps argument. Religion has been used to explain things since the beginning of time. Sun moves due to a god. Whirl pools are caused my monsters. Eventually things like this are figured out. A lack of an answer today doesn't mean no answer ever. But just saying god did it. Doesn't actually explain anything. Somethings may not be knowable. Accepting a god of the gaps argument is just lazy. How did god come to be? God just is? You just accept ignorance with that belief

[@earthisasphere]

@@joefriday2275 You are correct, but only through ignorance. Nothing exploded, and no one claims it did. Except ignorant creationists.Not knowing exactly how life began doesn't mean evolution is false. Poor old Joe just can't help but show his ignorance.

[@michaelwill7811]

@@earthisasphere "Not knowing, at all, how life began doesn't mean evolution is false." Fixed that for you, words are important. By that logic, it doesn't mean Evolution, more specifically Macro-Evolution, is true either... neither does a bunch of unfalsifiable theories prove Macro-Evolution true, or false....

[@Thruevangelisteyes]

D , you are a funny guy . But you will not have the last laugh. “ I also will laugh at your distress ; I will mock when your fear comes ; when your fear comes as …” Proverbs 1: 26-33 The One who made you will have the last laugh. ⏰ A neighbor.

[@d.columbia9603]

@Thruevangelisteyes if you read that and believe that is a god worth worshiping I feel sorry for you. That is truly a petty and pathetic perspective to have. Petty small people worshipping a petty small undeserving god

[@spikefunakoshi5667]

There are numerous different dinosaur species. How did they all get on Noah's Ark? A wooden ship would fall apart.

[@skydriver5709]

Dinosaurs still exist. They're called birds. Also, even the largest dinosaurs were born small enough to hold in your hands. Is anything I said incorrect?

[@spikefunakoshi5667]

@@skydriver5709 So are you claiming that all the different species of animals, insects, birds etc. that apparently entered the Ark were eggs or juveniles?

[@skydriver5709]

@@spikefunakoshi5667 I'm saying it would be far more logical than trying to transport a full grown Apatosaurus. I'm not saying there were dinosaurs on the ark at all (other than modern day dinosaurs "birds"), I was just pointing out your argument is probably the least logical argument against it.

[@spikefunakoshi5667]

@@skydriver5709 Given that there is no real scientific evidence at all for the 'flood' or the myth of the Ark the whole thing is at best academic. No real scientist gives the idea any credibility. Only so-called 'creation science' pushes this nonsense. There is not a single real university on the planet that would support this silly tale.

[@spikefunakoshi5667]

@@skydriver5709 And my answer is removed. There was no 'flood'. Human evolved well after the end of the dinosaurs. The only people who accept this nonsense know nothing about real science.

[@annep.1905]

This is completely off topic, but I love your background/cabin/room...

[@bobbysweeney5377]

Im 42 and have quite literally NEVER heard a biblical creationist claim there were dinosaurs on the ark. What in the world is this weird argument? Fossil records run dinosaurs "a bit toooooo far" for Noah. What?!?

[@WilliamHudson-ug7wz]

Well, I have. Being 42 years old just means you've had 4 decades of evolutionary indoctrination. It’s a shock to hear evidence of a competing worldview. Cosmology, geology and biology are looked at through a lens, or presuppositions. Try watching this video and others. There are answers to your questions or doubts.. you just have to look

[@bekah0008]

Yes, land animals made on day sox with humans (source: the Bible). Plus of you look at dragon lore and pictures left of people in the last 1000 years alone, they clearly depicted dinosaurs (dinosaur the word wasnt invented until the 1840's so called other things back then). They knew and saw dinos. Tales from. Marco polo to wild bill. Etc.. Yes dinos and humans existed at the same time. They were far less prevalent in the last 600 years but still about in some parts.

[@bekah0008]

Six*

[@scrqqge]

It is not for nothing there are so many tales of brave men conquering dragons

[@jockyoung4491]

Everyone agrees dragons are a cool myth. What does that have to do with dinosaurs?

[@scrqqge]

The dragons they fought were the dinosaurs

[@earthisasphere]

@@scrqqge Did you notice his use of the word myth?

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

They also fell in love with mermaids.

[@TrainerSpyro]

These are some great points however I'm not so much curious about whether or not they're fossilized "together" rather whenever or not humans can be found in the "dinosaur layers"at all. If they're not, what layers have humans been found in?

[@willbritton133]

Exactly. It's not that they haven't been found together but rather that anything even closely related to us (great apes) has never been found within 40 million years of the k-t extinction.

[@TheseusTitan]

Wait a minute… they found different dinosaur bones together. One reason they might have not found human and dinosaur bones together is humans probably tried to not spend time with dinosaurs. The dinosaurs tend to eat humans

[@igorkrugly4842]

But why then they didn't even met in one stratum?

[@TheseusTitan]

@@igorkrugly4842 Look up the Paluxy River Tracks. There are other cases in the world as well. It’s an interesting circumstance these things exist. Not sure why or what caused it.

[@JamesPatterson-gb9et]

Let's think about this thing really hard yall... God destroyed the cities of the plain in a night. He would have got it done quicker if he wasn't such a just and loving God that he had to get lot and his family out of the way first!

[@jimhepworth]

So because whale and coelacanth fossils have not been found together, you get a pass on no dino/human fossils ever being found. I see.

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

God bless AIG

[@HS-zk5nn]

here come all the athiests fighting so hard against something that doesnt "exist" ironically proving exactly the very thing that they fight against. hilarious

[@tims5268]

And yet 90% of the videos here on your favourite channel are ‘fighting against something they don’t think exists’. You know, the thing you lied about having a PhD in.

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@tims5268 I thought you didnt care "what I had to say next". you dont even believe yourself, great accuser.

[@Gek177]

​@@tims5268Hahaha, that's such a perfect observation of creationist projection.

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@Gek177 you missed the point. this channel says that the theory does exist. but it is wrong. sorry that you have had to have this explained to you.

[@tims5268]

@@HS-zk5nn I just enjoy laughing at your sheer incapability of making any sort of cogent argument 😂🤣😂 I also like pointing out to others that you are a compulsive liar Walter Mitty. Further to my point, calling out liars and fools does not prove the Bible 😂🤣😂🤣

[@caasquare]

There are dinosaur and human prints in the Paluxy River bed in Glenn Rose Texas. So you can see the dinosaur and human prints and a human footprint inside a dinosaur footprint. The creation evidence museum is not far from the river.

[@kurtdejgaard]

No there is not.

[@johnsmit5999]

I've made the point in another video that we do find birds fossilized in the same layers as dinosaurs(you mentioned the ducks), the other side of the coin is that flying animals like birds would have been able to stay aloft, even resting on wood rafts until they were exhausted, running out of resources, and eventually buried and fossilized. This would mean it would be pretty rare for a bird to be fossilized in the same layers as a dinosaur, not because birds evolved from dinosaurs, but because birds were able to avoid the deluge longer.

[@howardf5264]

Birds have been found in the same layers as dinosaurs in many places around the world One example is the Solnhoffen Limestone of Bavaria. However these birds lack beaks and have a snout with teeth.

[@mmaimmortals]

It rained for 40 days straight at the beginning of the Flood. Chances are that a huge % of animals were dead in the first month. It is possible and even likely that birds are sequenced late because most of them live among trees, not on the beach where initial inundation begins.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@mmaimmortals The arrangement of pterosaurs, birds, and bats renders that excuse a non-starter, dude. If your "they live in trees" argument was sound, then we'd expect coastal species to be universally at the bottom for all three lineages. But that's not what we see. Going further, we should expect these flighted species to simply just... do their thing and _fly away_ when the waters start to rise, leaving only flightless species (of which only exist among birds) to drown. But in that case, we should see flightless species, then bats, then birds, and then pterosaurs as the last holdouts. In fact, we _should_ still have pterosaurs now, flying around alongside the others. But we don't, despite them being, objectively, the best flying vertebrates _ever._

[@mmaimmortals]

@@burnttoast2790 "The arrangement of pterosaurs, birds, and bats renders..." Sorry, Mr. Toast, but this entire response was wrought in ignorance. There are a variety of coastal habitats found across the globe, so there can be no "universal" result as to where the fossils would be deposited. And no, the fliers would not necessarily just fly away. That reflects some ignorance about the readily available Genesis account. The 1st 40 days were characterized by heavy rain fall. A lot of fliers can't fly in heavy rain fall and most creatures the world over bed down during extended heavy rains. More realistic is that many, many creatures died in the first 40 days due to starvation and local flooding. On another note, flying reptiles have been attested to in historical writings.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@mmaimmortals *Sorry, Mr. Toast, but this entire response was wrought in ignorance.* Nope. It's called me knowing the logistics of ecology with regards to your mythical flood. You yourself have said _in this very thread_ that the waters rising would've been sufficient to do most of the divine dirty work in a month, and are now whining when I point out that the logical conclusion of that, of coastal species dying out first in this rapid flood concept you've got going. Don't throw around some bullsh1t3 and _not_ expect people to shovel it back over the fence. *There are a variety of coastal habitats found across the globe, so there can be no "universal" result as to where the fossils would be deposited.* Wrong as always, lad. If your flood waters were rising fast enough to kill just about everything so quickly, we'd expect to see coastal species gone first, and consequently being buried in the lowest terrestrial layers. Since we _don't_ see that the way you need (since we have plenty of coastal species existing throughout the fossil record) you need a better explanation. *And no, the fliers would not necessarily just fly away. That reflects some ignorance about the readily available Genesis account. The 1st 40 days were characterized by heavy rain fall. A lot of fliers can't fly in heavy rain fall and most creatures the world over bed down during extended heavy rains. More realistic is that many, many creatures died in the first 40 days due to starvation and local flooding.* Ah, but the "don't fly in heavy rain" thing is under _normal_ circumstances, which these wouldn't be. Again, we're talking rising waters such that the entire world would be covered in so short a time. Animals would flee from that as best they could, and for flighted animals that'd include flying away. Which then leads us back to the issue of their placement in the fossil record, since _your_ "model" would have it based on which ones could last the longest on the open ocean, which we don't see evidenced in the actual fossil record. *On another note, flying reptiles have been attested to in historical writings.* You mean chimerical, vaguely reptilian beasties of so varied form as to not really count as any true lineage? Or are you taking the Matt Powell approach in trusting faked images and writings for television programs.

[@lynngalibois1937]

Evolution is the process of adaptations and mutations that support the best survival means in its environment, the ceolucanth has not needed to evolve beyond its means for survival...

[@earthisasphere]

@@joefriday2275 Your lies don't evolve. You just keep repeating the same garbage over and over again.

[@BigTJK]

Dinosaurs predate manny millions of years so, no, you wouldn’t find their bones together.

[@robertopettyo]

The lion said the cruise was boring but the buffet was great.

[@nickma71]

Allow me to comment regarding the next presentation and this one and "dinosaurs". How could man do it. Who said an adult dragon of any kind was brought to him? Let's look at Genesis and the wording. The Holy Spirit chooses words carefully. They mean what he said. 19 Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. The creator brought them to Adam. Not in a shopping cart. The animals were obviously directed to go before Adam by the creator, God. After God directed the animals to the ark, Noah brought them on as commanded. This makes perfect sense, and is not contradicted by scripture (unlike the RCC).

[@adrianmasters250]

Um you guys don't actually think that two of every dinosaur would even physically fit on the ark, right?

[@earthisasphere]

You used a word that doesn't apply to subscribers of this site. That word would be "think."

[@bonniemoon6790]

With God all things are possible. Look into the dimensions of the ark, it was massive. Heck theres a real life sized ark they built in texas thats a museum, might help to go there, im sure itd be fun if you can keep an open mind.

[@adrianmasters250]

​@@bonniemoon6790 It just doesn't make sense, I can buy two of every animal but the idea of people and dinosaurs co-existing is a step too far

[@christellemaree8320]

Have you ever heard of eggs. Or babies. They tend to be smaller. Further it is not every dino but kinds. For example all dogs were ot on arc maby just 2 wolwes.

[@adrianmasters250]

@@christellemaree8320 that's not what the story says though, it says two of every animal and if it were eggs you wouldn't know if you'd get a male and female of each species. What about the meat eaters, you think they had fresh meat for the T-rex family every day with only two of each animal?

[@Doogie-ss3mp]

Gee, I don't know. Maybe it has to do with the 65 million year separation? Might be, ya know.

[@abigailfoster2467]

Their footprints have been found together

[@sciencerules2825]

No they haven't. The few claimed cases have all turned out to be creationist frauds.

[@Abidingingrace-p6z]

I have no problem believing God's word. He was there. We were not. Any guesses that assume differently are 100% false.

[@earthisasphere]

He may have been there, but the Bible is certainly not infallible. Every bit of evidence we have points to an old universe and an old Earth, and that evolution is the best explanation for the diversity of life we see today.

[@Bomtombadi1]

Says a book which says this god was there. Man, you’re absolutely pathetic.

[@Abidingingrace-p6z]

@@earthisasphere you're an atheist. Of course you believe that. Doesn't sway me.

[@Abidingingrace-p6z]

Of course you believe that you're an atheist. Lol Doesn't sway me.

[@MarSchlosser]

@@earthisasphere since when? I left OEC because it cannot answer YEC's claims.

[@HolyHolyHoly-c3e]

I forgot to say thanks for this video and your logical explanation.

[@-t2438]

Because they lived in completely different millennia and did not coexist.

[@stegokitty]

Aw, apparently you aren't able to deal with the evidence. Just more regurgitating the narrative that you've been spoon fed all your life.

[@earthisasphere]

@@stegokitty What evidence? There is no evidence for a young earth. All the evidence we have points to an old earth and universe. Give on good piece of evidence for a young earth.

[@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober]

@@stegokitty what farking evidence?!?! This isn't evidence. It's just what these frauds always do - lie, misrepresent and fool their gullible audience (like you) with big words

[@ginag1290]

Well, if a flood happened right now ,I can promise you that you would not find my bones next to a grizzly bear. Why? Because I live far away from vicious animals 😂❤

[@Thruevangelisteyes]

Gina , good answer ! 🙏🏼🎶

[@miscamisca6775]

The key point is not the geographic places. It is that humans and dinos do no exist in the same layer, dinos are in older layers where no humans have been found

[@KenJackson_US]

If a paleontologist found dinosaur and human remains together what would he do? He couldn't publish it. No paper would take it. No peer reviewers would approve it. He would know it. So he would either quietly ignore the humans or declare the site to be contaminated and move to another. I'm guessing it has happened.

[@samburns3329]

Hey, it's blithering eejit Cheerleader Kenny! Have you earned that GED yet Kenny?

[@KenJackson_US]

@@samburns3329 I appreciate that you don't like me declaring you to be a "cheerleader" but it's thoroughly justified. You could choose to learn some science instead of arguing so energetically for what you can't defend.

[@samburns3329]

@@KenJackson_US Cheerleader Kenny you're one of the most scientifically illiterate creationists here and that's saying something. You couldn't even pass a Jr. High School science test. 😄

[@therick363]

@@KenJackson_USyour opening post-pure lying.

[@KenJackson_US]

@@therick363 Then tell me what he would do. What journal would accept a paper on it? Why would he end his career by acknowledging the truth of what he found?

[@JCGThewordis]

TO ALL THE EVOLUTIONIST OUT THERE: "Drop that stupid Monkey chart and step away from the child"

[@earthisasphere]

Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to form 13) the change in salinity levels would kill both freshwater and saltwater fish ,and on and on and on

[@logicalatheist1065]

Be ignorant, be proud, be a creationist.

[@vando6679]

Why is that in quotations??? Are you quoting someone?

[@mirandahotspring4019]

Yet it seems to be mainly priests and other clergy that are the ones to be concerned about around children!

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@mirandahotspring4019 absolutely, Keep the children away from religion!!

[@realWorsin]

We have plenty of species on earth that are separated by land mass and will never intermix unless humans make them.

[@arsstv]

This must be the stupidest argument i've ever heard for legitimacy of creation theory. Literally everyone who watched this video lost brain cells.

[@MrStanleyMilton]

What specific point is "Stupid"? Take it down point by point...I dare ya.

[@arsstv]

@@MrStanleyMilton As if i care about a random dare in the interwebs... But if you insist, believing that the flood ark even happened is all the levels of stupid you could ever get and even more than that.

[@MrStanleyMilton]

@@arsstv Not "Random" Very pointed-AT YOU...And your response? Another generalized accusation of stupidity , based on...Nothing but your uppity attitude. Calling ideas stupid does not show why? Maybe you are too stupid to understand?

[@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober]

Couldn't agree more!

[@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober]

@@MrStanleyMilton - let's start with the easiest. How about the fact that a global flood of that magnitude (or any really) COULD NOT PHYSICALLY HAPPEN without making the Earth an glowing molten mass.

[@christopherdriesenga4156]

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

[@dennisanderson3895]

9:11 I've a new term for "well-intentioned" theories: Just-So Science. (TY Calvin for inspiring it!) I think Kipling would approve of the crossover.

[@McFly8245]

Listen God can create the earth with age, he created Adam with age God can do anything he wants.

[@Bomtombadi1]

That’s called a cop out, McFly. An excuse. Or fan fiction.

[@McFly8245]

@@Bomtombadi1 you’re called a weirdo 😆

[@Bomtombadi1]

@@McFly8245 why does that make me a weirdo?

[@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober]

It's a kind of magic...

[@earthisasphere]

Why would he leave all this evidence behind that completely refutes what he "did? That makes no sense. In fact, it is basically lying to all of humanity.

[@nomadicoasis9260]

There are however human footprints imprinted on top on dinosaur footprints.

[@burnttoast2790]

You mean that one hand-carved fake kept by that fraud Baugh in Texas?

[@howardf5264]

Even Answers in Genesis claims those human footprints are of dubious origin.

[@nomadicoasis9260]

@@howardf5264 it's not an isolated find... there are several places, I've seen photo's

[@sciencerules2825]

@@nomadicoasis9260 References please. Every such "find" to date has been exposed as creationist fraud.

[@jonwilkinson7695]

The question is why are they not found in the same rock layers. If they all died at the same time during the food they should all be buried in the same rock layer. They don't gave to be holding hands.

[@Charlie94781]

Answers in Genesis is full of mythology and pseudoscience

[@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober]

That's being rather nice. I would have said their full of 💩💩💩💩

[@richardnixon9324]

You're not as smart as you think.

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

Good job AIG

[@logicalatheist1065]

What job did they do good at? Lying? 🤥🤥🤥

[@therick363]

You think it’s okay to lie?

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@therick363 careful some clown thinks we're the same person... lol (when you run out of arguments)

[@therick363]

@@logicalatheist1065 really? Unfortunately not surprising. I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts and when i asked them about it they went quiet

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

Psalm 1 Blessed is the man Who walks not in the counsel of the ungodly, Nor stands in the path of sinners, Nor sits in the seat of the scornful; 2 But his delight is in the law of the Lord, And in His law he meditates day and night. 3 He shall be like a tree Planted by the rivers of water, That brings forth its fruit in its season, Whose leaf also shall not wither; And whatever he does shall prosper.

[@user-cc9ck8th2b]

Thanks for your work!

[@robertrisner8829]

Misrepresentation at it's best. Only works if you ignore or dismiss the science showing the earth is indeed older than 6000 yrs. And typical strawman response.

[@Censoredbyyourcult]

Short answer: Because they didn't live together.

[@sisto5266]

Great communicator and even better channel logo, that’s the only merit I give to this… everything else I just incredibly nonsensical . Semantic deep dives with absolutely no real weight. This is irresponsible.

[@hansdemos6510]

The question "why don't we find human fossils and dinosaur fossils buried together" is misleading. The actual question is why we don't find human fossils and dinosaur fossils buried in the same rock layer, or in rock layers that are dated to the same age. This breaks down into two possible scenarios. If we found dinosaur fossils in rock layers with modern human fossils that were dated 4500 years old (or at least less than say 2 million years, if we include our immediate ancestor species), then all that would mean is that some population of dinosaurs would have survived the extinction event that killed off their cousins 66 or so million years ago. This would not contradict the modern scientific theory of evolution. We would expect to be able to extract DNA from at least some of these remains, as we have done from human and other remains of this age. Needless to say, that this has not (yet) happened. If we found modern human fossils in rock layers with dinosaur fossils that were dated 66 million years old or older, then that would contradict the modern scientific theory of evolution. We would not expect to be able to extract DNA from such remains. this too has never yet happened.