Why Men And Women Probably Won't Ever Get Along...

[@bizzwoofer]

Exactly. Our society has become so materialistic that money seems to be the foundation of every relationship. I don't think it's by mistake, either.

[@truthseekingfreethinker5214]

If people stopped wanting material things, society would crumble. That is the real rat race

[@sebbonxxsebbon6824]

Rescinding the 16th amendment would alter things a bunch.

[@allseeingotto2912]

All by design Hand wringing intensifies 👏🏻

[@c-b.s.7624]

all ancient societies knew that the human civilization is cyclical, at the end of each cycle, right before its total collapse, women become fully "corrupted" as the Indian Vedas called it. This "evil" time is relatively short lived and after 99% of humanity perishes in a devastating cataclysm, gender relations switch back to its normal and healthy state. Women will live in constant fear to be raped or hijacked or just eaten by wild animals, a womans" value will equal that of a loaf of bread and women will start to love their husbands as "saviors" like never before. The rule of the male will once again be established in this golden age, until humanity multiplies again bringing upon them a new wave of decay and corruption of women.

[@raslipmugfrud2040]

Man being made for the economy rather than the economy is made for man

[@pokemercenary6511]

How can men and women be in “relationships” when we can’t even relate to each other?

[@easter_sunday]

You can’t. Women are in a relationship with social media.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

@@easter_sunday Rubbish!

[@b1zzarecont4ct]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 not rubbish, most are

[@trevoravery9270]

I dont think men and women are "designed" to be in relationships. we are designed to procreate. And you dont need a relationship for that.

[@easter_sunday]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 it’s not. Social media is the vehicle women use to come to consensus and receive validation. That is a relationship.

[@DrmCom2003]

A question I've pondered for years. We've reached the point where we can't go back to the way things were. Even normies are becoming aware of the dangers in being in a relationship. Men will always have more to lose as we are the expendable sex.

[@truckingbachelor2277]

I really think the same thing, there are slightly more normies waking up, I'm 42yo, I had no knowledge of this in my late teens into early 20s, as the internet was still very very new in the mid to late 90s. Now thanks to the internet and many channels of mgtow and redpill content has reached many. Honestly even without that tech, men are reaching that understanding through hardship of divorce and family courts. Plus inflation means men who are earning average salaries are feeling the amount of money dating costs every weekend.

[@domen1154]

Wouldn't men being disposable mean that we have less to lose?

[@malicant123]

There was a guy with whom I used to work. He was very much a normie, but he had been through hell with his ex-wife. He would often tell me "never, ever get married!".

[@tinagold3395]

What do you mean “the way things were?” There was never a time where gender relations were good, they just benefited men and women were silenced.

[@DrmCom2003]

@@domen1154 A very good question. Most men don't like to think of themselves as disposable. Whether it's through a societal or biological narrative, we're programmed to feel like we have a use. It's only through lessons and experience that we realize that what we want means shit to people.

[@jimlambrick4642]

'We weren't ever meant to live in these large scale societies' pretty much sums up the main modern problem. Back in the ancient 60's I worked in remoter parts of East Africa and around small clan level subsistence agriculture living which was doubtlessly very similar to the long evolutionary way of human interactions. Basically day to day through 'work hours' the women would all be together, the men all together, and the children all play together. No electricity or anything modern of course. Only after dark would the three groups usually come together as social interaction, usually around a fire. Two or three hours of that, the men drinking pombe (banana beer) and then it would break up to individual families going to sleep in their mud hut. Next morning, at dawn, repeat. These people, despite poverty unimaginable to any modern person, were invariably very happy as individuals because they had that one thing most modern people don't: complete group security and identity and a knowledge of where they fitted in. They had value; they had purpose. There were social hierarchies, higher status males often having more than one wife, and sometimes the entire group would revolve around one male and his wives. But there was never any serious conflicts, everybody would settle into their own status niche and life would go on. None of this exists in any modern society, or course, but the evolutionary ghost of it certainly does.

[@ryanscarrmusic2329]

look at papa new gunea thats what your destcribing now and there is loads of violence but i agree modern life makes you need invisible and unwanted

[@db1777]

This is my way of thinking as well. Humanity started going downwards once we moved out of tribal societys.

[@gaodacheese4691]

this is actually fkin interesting. But how could people in modern western societies at least try to mimic this?

[@armoredghost6180]

Is banana beer good?

[@malicant123]

That's how we're meant to live. What would be interesting, though obviously not something that I would want to have happen, would be to introduce feminism to that tribal group. A feminist would tell you that it would empower the women and elevate the whole tribe because "reasons". In reality, the tribal group would be wiped out by another tribe who would kill the men and take the females. It's only in an utterly decadent "society" that a pipe-dream like feminism could exist. In nature, it would be and is an evolutionary dead end.

[@roninsjourney7560]

If you take away sex/biological drive/attraction, I don't think men and women would really interact that much. We're too different and not as compatible as we think. Another bizarre aspect of this reality.

[@CrummyVCR]

Yes, I completely agree. I was also thinking just how insane women would get if most men when monk mode and held that frame. Imagine the absolute state of chaos that would be after a couple of years.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

What would be the basis for that reaction? The problem is that men cannot separate sex from conversation with a women and there are some women who use that to their advantage. Added to that, and we have to resort to generalisations, men are stronger than women and the interests are more physically orientated. Is it not better to consider someone, male or female, who is complementary to us. Someone who shares in similar interests and seeks similar goals in friendship? All relationships can change and develop positively or negatively.

[@dududu5189]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 Instead of commenting in Male spaces YOU could make yourself useful and actually confront the *Amber Heard's* in your circle.

[@rokor3578]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 You really think men dont want that?

[@electric_sand]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 Since you seem to have a good grasp of the problem, why not move on and let men be? why invade those very same male spaces?

[@lordofgingers]

Two in a row! You been holding out on us. It’s a roll of the dice and when both men and women have their own LMS, the truth is the two sexes don’t like each other as much as they thought as evidenced by the failure rates. It’s kinda sad but as you said it is what it is

[@reality-always-wins.9014]

Men and women will never get along by the simple fact that men have honor and women don't. Worse part women are solipsistic.

[@luisd5098]

🤦🏿‍♂️

[@lordofgingers]

@@luisd5098 I’m assuming you believe the exact opposite of what I just said to warrant a facepalm?

[@lord.of_iron]

It is what it be, indeed, Sir Red.

[@lordofgingers]

@@thereisnosanctuary6184 I’m an accountant not a detective or private eye 😂

[@drxstudio1473]

I ve been thinking about this from primary scool when i had my first interactions with girls. I could get along with them only for short periods of time in my entire life. In the past sexes were separated at workplaces for a good reason. Listening to your thaughts from a foreign country far away proves that we are thinking the same way everywhere in the globe.

[@deltaxcd]

I think in that situation it may be more of the cultural issue because little girls are not that different from boys but they get different care. later at puberty girls change a lot mostly by ramping up the level of neuroticism while boys say mostly the same.

[@bigcheech1937]

When I had gfs, I found myself with a drinking habit…having to dumb myself down to be able to play the utility role needed to meet the standards set by social media and her friend group. Single now and I haven’t touched alcohol since I stopped dating. Go figure 🤷🏾‍♂️

[@brandonwombacher2559]

Women Are Overrated. They cause more problems than their worth.

[@samrosendahl392]

Women exist to enforce social standards. They are the amateur spies, the janitors of orthodoxy, and custom. They live to make uniformity and use shame tactics to best kill any uniqueness, eccentricity, strength, and siphon all that can be harnessed from others

[@Oldhogleg]

The most common error both sexes make is that they project their own values, morals and their own nature onto the opposite sex, then scratch their collective heads in puzzlement that it never seems to work out the way they thought. A classic example is that gals see guys with high paying careers with high social status as high value mates, so they naturally assume guys would see gals with high paying careers with high status as high value mates when in reality guys have no interest what a gal does for a living, but a gal will ALWAYS ask what the guy does for a living to categorize him.

[@greatestever7623]

That’s them being brainwashed by the cia created feminist & feminism cult bullshit men are made women are just ARE and their prime is only from 18-26 27 pushing it after that no man is interested especially a hvm with $$ & options

[@charaznable9209]

Girls leading with questions about job, finances, etc. come across as predatory to me. That's like a guy who starts asking them their bra size and whether they shave down there before anything else.

[@Oldhogleg]

@@charaznable9209 Except they do while pretending to be interested in you, so it comes off as purely innocent small talk.

[@supergobgoblin424]

Collective...collective...counciousness... Let your country control your soul!

[@Oldhogleg]

@@zz-if1ic Actually, tats on gals is a red flag for mental disorders like depression, anxiety, and self mutilation.

[@markhansen6236]

I don't think men and women are meant to spend this much time together, including romantic partners. I think historically society was never this atomized and men would spend more time with other men from their community. The same is true for women, they would spend time with other women.

[@fredbloggs5902]

Agreed, we evolved as Hunter-gatherers in groups of 100-200.

[@brandonwombacher2559]

I think Men & Women can spend a small amount of time together but no way long term.

[@malicant123]

Why would we ever get along? Why is human history filled with tales of friendships between men such as Gilgamesh and Enkidu, Nick Carraway and Jay Gatsby, Huck and Jim and even Frodo and Sam? It's because men will connect on a level that women are simply not capable of. Why do men love dogs? It's because their loyalty is something that we understand, though often fail to match. Women can be good company at times, but they are fickle, histrionic and ultimately just not good friends for men. They don't even seem to form lasting friendships among themselves...

[@malicant123]

@Mortal Coils I did MMA for a few years. The trainer was a serious martial artist. He didn't allow classes to mix. There were male MMA classes and there were female classes. It worked out for best for everyone. Contrast that with a Krav Maga class that I did before that. In this class, the trainers allowed men and women to mingle. More than once, I was paired with a jumpy female whom I had to baby-sit. One of the other lads got yelled at for flooring one of them when she was holding the strike pad for him. Yikes...

[@pbonfanti]

Maybe loyalty can't be achieved from women, for their nature it is a liability, and when women have the gov playing together, you know things can get much worse.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

@@malicant123 Sensible teacher. It has more to do with the physical capabilities of the male copared to the female than anything else.

[@malicant123]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 Well I think that his justification was that as MMA is segregated sport, there is absolutely no reason for men and women to train together and every reason for them not to.

[@charaznable9209]

@@malicant123 When I was taking martial arts classes we had a few female students, the teacher would always pair me with them because I was too rough on the guys and he said I needed to learn to be more gentle. I found the vast majority of them were not there to learn but to make doe eyes at cute guys in the class so they ended up being mostly just a distraction. The girl I liked ended up dating another guy in the class who was ranked above me, they stopped coming to class so much and I ended up becoming a better martial artist than that guy because he was distracted. Out of all the female students I worked with only one of them seemed to actually be serious about learning. The rest were there to try and get a hot boyfriend.

[@IvanPolyansky]

It’s like with any other interaction in your life - be it friends or family or acquaintances - when there’s no common goal or problem, then there’s really no need in communicating and collaborating. And wo m en hold an exclusive right to create those problems for men (i.e. constant nagging followed by giving birth to children) and are praised by soyciety for this built-in biological feature. As long as we allow Daddy Government to (ostensibly) solve these problems for us (i.e. promote single mommyhood and help wo men raise pussified men without fathers), men and wo m e n will never get along. And honestly, I don’t necessarily see this as a bad thing. I think the days of happy family bullshit and raising children are over. It’s the time of a free man, a truly responsible man in a sense that he’s responsible for his own life. And wo m en, I care less and less about them with each passing day, let them deal with their shit for themselves.

[@dantonkull6491]

why do you write women like that

[@bobjamer8956]

@@dantonkull6491 I think certain words written will get their comments shadow banned or deleted by the powers that be..(wink..wink) I've seen guys spell it like.."wahmen"

[@heavymetal3256]

@@dantonkull6491 freaking youtube

[@tanura5830]

Tax money goes to single moms, sad. Single moms children should die from hunger, we don't want kids with genes from women who can't choose responsible partner walking around

[@simonkolar5478]

Gender differences: - men are interested in things, women in people - men think for the long term, women for their current being - men are mostly driven by logic, women by emotions - men have better analytical skills, women are superior in social skills - men size each other up by capability, women by status - men want to provide resources, women want to provide care - men date within their league, women date paraller or up - men want stable relationships, women want some drama added in - men take risks and play to win, women play it safe so as not to lose - men love women, women love children - men can be physically violent, women psychologically abusive - men can get slowly bored in relationships, women get bored after 5-10 years - men crave for sex and strength, women for status and attention ... and on and on and on ...

[@simonkolar5478]

@Trst97 That's because men love and care about women. Women get emotionally destroyed if their children turn against them.

[@cruelreality6789]

Women can be violent too, actually I’ve seen some stats and believe women are more violent in relationships it is just normalized or ignored. Men also like status and attention just not as much. Lastly, men love their children too idk what you were talking about with that one.

[@johnmike1771]

Women physically age faster and men physically age slower and men have more testerone and women have a higher dosage of estrogen and men are less selective in mating and quantitative about how many mates they have and women are more selective and qualitative in their mating strategy

[@THETRIVIALTHINGS]

Men are interested in people too, more so, men always have the instinct to be with their tribes. Men also want to provide care. Moreso than women. We care about our children often more than women. Men often avoid risks because we are analytical. Men also love children, often more than women, because that's their genepool. Women can be physically violent too, way more than men, and they're vicious. Men often never get bored as long as men are happy, sometimes, even if they aren't. Men crave for closeness and trust.

[@johnmike1771]

@@THETRIVIALTHINGS true

[@lorenzocardenas5071]

Women will always choose what’s in their best interest. Men appear to not be that way and the current modern society proves it. What woman has ever showed mercy that wasn’t your mother? Exactly.

[@latt.qcd9221]

Men and women got along back then because they *_had_* to in order to survive, not because men and women naturally get along.

[@yoyo762]

It was required to survive. Shared labor. The work load to survive was too much for an individual back then.

[@BobelPop]

The way things are going I can see things are beyond just not getting along. There's down outright hostility being manufactured to the point I could see society becoming similar to the plot of Vandread where man & women don't even see each other as being part of the same species & are at raging war with one another.

[@pbonfanti]

That was a very nice anime, and really to see them as aliens makes all the sense, more than ever.

[@dududu5189]

Despite women currently being the overly aggressive ones, both physically & especially psychologically... ...imagine if Men decided they'd had enough and instead of being controlled & rational decided to fight back for a change? How long do you think such a war would go on?

[@potheadraccoon8536]

@@dududu5189 with the amount of simps willing to sacrifice themselves for some box the war would be pretty long and i dont mean just leftist simps the right has its simps too

[@richarddo7881]

​@@dududu5189 yea but consider most men are biologically programmed to be a simp for females, I doubt men will liberate themselves out of women clutch, meanwhile females can easily hate on Men because in their eyes, if you are not the top men that fufilled their hypergamous instinct then you are as good as death

[@crazyrr144]

Authors a simp if he thinks that would work

[@fredkeeler1234]

The cause of the tension between the sexes is the denial of these differences between them. Simply accepting them and to stop creating a false equivalence between them will make everyone much happier.

[@liamc4113]

Community/tribe is what bring men and women together in a long term alliance and keep everyone in check. Industrialization/globalization has atomized individuals and eroded traditional roles and relationship to the point that we really don't need each other to survive locally, which is what it is. Our psychology just has not adept to the new normal (game) yet.

[@deltaxcd]

You overestimate influence of tribe community, the reason why men and women stayed together was just plain convenience. nobody woud give a shit if rather than man and woman 2 men of 3 women decided to get together. but if they leave no children they woud be forgotten quickly.

[@zambooza13]

What I've noticed is women are more interested in people and guys are more interested in things.

[@fillfinish7302]

Simplistic .

[@zambooza13]

@@fillfinish7302 If you want to sit around and analyze women's thought processes be my guest. I'd rather make money and enjoy my hobbies.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

@@zambooza13 I'd rather be enjoying my hobbies and persuing my interests as well. Men's thought processes are only a problem when they don't converge with mine.

[@deltaxcd]

well I think the reason is more cynical than expected, It is hard to be interested in people when you are being rejected and treated like shit by everyone. As a guy you don't have that much choice. put a guy into hot female body and he will be also very interested in people :)

[@DevPythonUnity]

no , women are more interested in people so they can still stuff from them!!!, the are more interested in stealing

[@Judge_Red]

Why men and women won't ever get along? Because dominance instinct in both sexes. It's all about who has the upper hand.

[@ronizielinski4048]

Yes, that seems to be the main ruler of this reality in every relationship of any kind...

[@ronizielinski4048]

You want to be nice and kind and share with another individual, but then u realize they run with everything and take all the credit, therefore everything is a power struggle. It is too much a battle for me tbh

[@brandonwombacher2559]

Women and Men will never get along cause we are Competitors at the end of the day.

[@ronizielinski4048]

@@brandonwombacher2559 :(

[@paulespinoza6781]

Finally seeing the amount of subscribers you have on KZbin’s mobile app. Love your work btw

[@mexicounexplained]

That was a good move you made to start showing your sub count. A higher sub count gives your channel "more authority" in the minds of many (often subconsciously), so you should expect even more subs because of this. I say this because I love your content, and with more subs I know you can do more. Adelante.

[@josueramirez7247]

I think it was a change by KZbin to force all channels to show their sub count to hopefully try to make scam/impersonator channels more obvious.

[@mexicounexplained]

@@josueramirez7247 I had no idea about that change.

[@IvanPolyansky]

It’s a change by KZbin.

[@interesting2491]

Also, people like to associate themselves with a ‘recognised’ and ‘popular’ group - He will soon reach 100k by the end of the year for sure - His topics are VERY relevant and philosophical regarding society

[@zombiemachinery4868]

Because deep inside we don't like each other and we have almost nothing in common but to get together and reproduce to please the meat grinder we call mother nature.

[@zombiemachinery4868]

@Mortal Coils, the funniest part is that I have no issues getting box either but yeah, if they insult you the odds are you might be telling the truth.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

@@Zenoandturtle we all live a lie to a certain extent but I have never heard or thought of Mother Nature being a meat-grinder before.

[@BEYOND-EGO]

@@carolleenkelmann4751if you think Mother Nature is not a meat grinder you don’t think deep enough

[@v77scorpio41]

Also reason why romance was heavily popergated into society during the 18th and 19th century. It was dam near impossible to get a man stable with a woman. They all were nomad cheaters. So “ROMANCE” created an ideology of purpose, cause and reward for stabling with a woman for marriage and family. The 1950’s was essentially humanities mating season where human populations grew after WW2. Clear as day Romance is a program. Not an actual fact of life everyone can get. And bc the Baby Boom program is over (love, romance, marriage, commitment). A new one has emerged in its place, DEPOPULATION. Dehumanization, and more. We’re seeing the beginning stages with economic collapses that easily could be resolved. Point is…. We’ve been lied to about love. Love is a belief system engrained in us by who ever controls media programming worldwide .

[@potheadraccoon8536]

@@Zenoandturtle alex jones is a fr33 mas0n gate keeper

[@lovelystarsee9632]

If you are making all these arguments, go around and cheat. No one is stopping you!

[@agustinmilone1346]

You’re basically saying we started being monogamous less than 100 years ago? We’ve been like that for ages, tf are you talking about

[@DonManuelConLeonsJacket]

I believe marriage had been weaponized long ago as a scam/scheme designed 4 most men.

[@PatronHall]

With all due respect, I think this video is almost completely wrong, TA. The most important difference between men and women is that men are direct, women are indirect. Every debate with a women needs to be seen through this lens. Women do not argue in good faith because that would be a *direct* strategy. All of these "beliefs" that women have--wage gap, equality of outcome/capability--women only pretend to believe in these things as a tactic. They argue these things publicly but rarely truly believe them in a private, good faith discussion. In a peaceful, childless situation, women--especially younger women--cannot appreciate gender roles. So they want what men have, but cannot acquire it through an honest contest. So they have to do what works for them, and manipulate. They know that direct competition with men is a doomed proposition and avoid it at all costs. Their method is PROXY competition, so they have to warp and galvanize society to fight for them. Feminist hypocrisy is by design. If feminists made sense, they'd get equal rights but they'd also get equal outcomes and they know that means that they'll lose direct competition and have to rely on men. They've convinced themselves that this is unacceptable, so they need a perpetual fight for power. The moment the dust is settled and their demands are met, the most capable humans in most fields will rise to the top and women will be the "support" class, because that's how their designed. This is what they're fighting to avoid.

[@ssing7113]

Dude. Just sum it up by men are logical. Women are emotional.

[@PatronHall]

@@ssing7113 It's not about logic vs. emotion. It's about tactics. TA's argument is based on taking women's talking points at face value when they have evolved to never fight a fair fight. It's not even a knock on women. They'd be foolish to fight straight up when they're not designed to.

[@ghostinthemachine8243]

Pretty hard to find any fault with your argument.

[@samueldawkins]

this is very accurate I think

[@pbonfanti]

@@PatronHall one thing does not exclude another. For me the arguments sums together in a bigger picture.

[@gravelpit5680]

their front-box is their currency. its how they get attention, validation, materials and pleasure. They spend it up til its useless, and then simps still give them everything. So now yall know. Better to just Go My Own Way. Thanks Stardusk

[@SanguineSet]

Yes, the past was certainly not better. Women were well documented as being highly problematic in Rome, Greece and during the middle ages among other places. It's the same old pattern, socially favored men fucked and enjoyed life whilst your average Joe was treated harshly as expendable tools. The boomer time after WWII was an aberrant period, as so many men were slaughtered in WWII, and the wealth in the Americas compared to other places, led to some less favorable men getting access to women.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

Yes indeed. My first prospective father was killed in a night run over Germany in the war. Yes, it seems we are sending all the best young men off to war to be killed and leaving the leftovers for the most part at home and after the war to breed.

[@DonManuelConLeonsJacket]

Elaborate on "socially favored men" & "less favorable men". Is this all about the halo & horn effect? Or more deep like 4 example: ethics?

[@ekurisona663]

'women know what to do, men have to figure out what to do'

[@drunkdonutboy]

I think Sherlock Holmes said it best "The motives of women are so inscrutable. I mean, how can you build on such a quicksand? Their most trivial action may mean volumes or their most extraordinary conduct may depend upon a hairpin or a curling tong!"

[@marcustrajan4873]

What sick ridiculous puppets we are / and what gross little stage we dance on / What fun we have dancing and f***ing / Not a care in the world / Not knowing that we are nothing / We are not what was intended.

[@EsotericOccultist]

Men are builders providers and protectors. Women saunter around in flip flops and yoga pants and do twerk dancing.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

To the comment: why do you say that when you know that is false in generalisation.Just to provocate? Draw attention to yourself. Should one ignore you or hold you to account ?

[@reality-always-wins.9014]

This is funny but is the truth😂😂😂

[@trevoravery9270]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 Generally speaking, he is 100% correct. Truth and reality arent for everyone.

[@allseeingotto2912]

Twerking is a low 👁Q mating dance .

[@dasuero7489]

Sounds about right lmao

[@MidKnightblue0013]

9:48 yea, I'd say it's like 3/4 (that are failures) when you consider that half the people who stay married are not really happy about it, just kind of settling for what they can get or bound by the honor of their vow.

[@Gesssy]

At the same time that the man is always in need of sex like a crack addict, his identity is based precisely on the idea of virility fused with this sex addiction. Then the woman works as a drug dealer who sells temporary relief and reinforcement of his virile identity, because she herself is only fertile from time to time and her identity is not linked to sexual potency, so she is not dependent on sex to the point of begging, paying , or snatch affection, as men do. Men need a harm reduction approach to substance abusers.

[@pbonfanti]

The Donald Symons's (antropologist) theory about why humans don't make sex in public (like other animals do it): A male chimp have more chance of sharing the meat from a hunt with a female on the heat. So maybe in hunter-gatherers societies women evolved to have a discrete heat, so even if they marry a lesser man, they can seduce a superior man, in private, and be impregnated by him, by example.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

Don't worry. women are slowly becoming like men and men......well, what have we read in these comments about what men are becoming. Try looking at what we are eating and the effects of plastics on the water (along with all the antibiotics and contraceptives. etc., etc) as well.

[@DonManuelConLeonsJacket]

​@@pbonfanti U talking about the dual mating strategy.

[@Timdeuces]

Still interested in your eventual discussion with Alex. I wanna see perhaps how the data he presents can be applied from the Thinking Ape perspective, and maybe the similarities and differences between you guys' perspectives

[@oldfriend327]

Thank you so much for this and all of your video sir. You are one of our favorite and based on many of the comments a great speaker and objective thinker. We are about the same age, I am 48 and it sounds like what you said before are about 50 and am blown away by your approach. Thank you for all of your efforts here to try and get people to think about things. So many men learn in the most miserable of ways because genetics and drive continue to warp men's focus and obligate men to have to work harder than women in every single aspect of life other than pregnancy. It really did not hit me until my very late thirties, early forties that not being in a commitment with a woman is not going to sabotage the rest of things in life. It is not as good as what you deeply want to believe it is. I admit that for decades that I deeply coveted a commitment with a woman and was either consciously or subconsciously finding ways to activate it into my life. A former neighbor of mine who was a Vietnam Veteran and later a police officer told me one of the hardest lessons a man will learn is that men and women are beyond dimensions apart in reality even when they agree on any given topic and that "love, romance, and loyalty" absolutely cannot bridge the differences. Yes, sex is great. It is does mean people must agree to procreation, marriage, or a "commitment" either. My only complaint really is how annoying it is that people who do have kids and/or are married for the most part find some way of guilting those who are not. I just wish they would stop making unnecessary guilt trip comments.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

I thought "guilting" was a thing of the past- It might be seen as friends and associates encouragement. Man was not meant to be alone but sometimes, being alone is preferable to being slowly poisoned, smothered or murdered.

[@crassusconquest12]

We’re animals, end of the day, male and female pair bonding for life is generally the exception to the rule for most animals with the exception mostly that comes from birds, mammals really don’t pair bond for life, our higher cognitive function taken into account, people still have emotions and are illogical at times. Most people, can’t do something or be with one person, their entire life. That’s just a fact

[@carnivoreveganbicyclist]

Go touch grass and you'll see mammals who are pairbonded.

[@crassusconquest12]

@@carnivoreveganbicyclist don’t know where you live but over 90% of mammals don’t pair bond, my point was it’s hard for humans to because of male female dynamics but also biology and millions of years of evolution, it’s just not in our dna as a species

[@J.B.1982]

Men and women work well apart for much time. Men and woman had their respective communities and it’s necessary. We have destroyed that slowly through time.

[@browpetj]

Pretty comprehensive review here. Great work :0)

[@rollthelosingdice]

They can both get along if they know the truth, very few do.

[@DonManuelConLeonsJacket]

Enlighten us

[@justinbrink7425]

As always great insights. Thats why I Patron. Everyone else should too. Stardusk is an OG. He deserves much more

[@searedscallops318]

9:29. I think that "the ooga booga" may be my new favorite way of describing those underlying primal human behaviors that seemingly most normies are unaware of despite it hindering the "progress" of civilization in various ways. Can't seem to take the monkey/ape out of us, can we? Though we sure like to pretend that we're not just a bunch of vocally articulating apes.

[@SCP--tp1qr]

The differences that made us will be the differences that break us

[@LionKimbro]

A real eye-opener for me, was talking with and forming closer ties with gay men. In gay men, we can see what male sexual desire is like, without the governing factor of women's needs, women's fears, women's anger, women's judgements. I came to realize that heterosexual men are basically just gay men who happen to be sexually exclusively attracted to women. What I mean is that gay men and heterosexual men have far more in common, than heterosexual men and heterosexual women. Women do not sexually shame or attack gay men, but women DO sexually shame and attack heterosexual men, for pretty much being the same exact thing. When this became really clear to me, the incommensurability between men and women also became really clear to me. And my tolerance for female shaming and criticizing of men for men's sexuality, dropped through the floor as well. I have basically no tolerance for women's myriad and subtle ways of shaming men for being men. I agree with Stardusk that things were not better in the past than in the present.

[@DonManuelConLeonsJacket]

I also noticed this double standard that has been encouraged by the newest wave of fem1n1sm

[@TimmyCramer]

I truly enjoy a woman's company when it's on a fair playing field ie, follow the money! Dutch Treat dating is the only way to deal with women today......otherwise the man pays and eventually gets the red ass or upset and the house of cards comes down. Most if not all women today are career women......reach for the bill ms. sugarbuns!! Timmy C Arizona

[@mgtowski395]

+1

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

Say, what is this. A man's club for bashing women? Dutch treating is a must if you want to protect your independence. A nicer way of doing it is to establish rules of acceptable behaviour before going out to eat together on a date. Society has dismantled etiquette. Politness and manners was an acceptable way of governing social reaction and interaction, making it easier to communicate.

[@deltaxcd]

The main problem here is that someone has to pay at all as entire interaction turns into WORK. it is easy to find a woman who will go dutch and happily pay whatever is required, but where do you find a woman who is not interested in anything money related at all? who rather than going to restaurant will go for a hike or rather than going to boutique will ask to go raid some trash cans? not because she is poor and homeless but because she is absolutely not interested in money and status.

[@JordanPeverelli]

I think that's a really good way to put it. "Most if not all women today are career women" That's what they've wanted, now that's what they've got, understand that and proceed with caution, if you still desire to do so. "Dutch Treat dating" Heh, yup pretty much. Definitely a good way to put it, thanks from a 22 year old, I'll remember those two lines for the rest of my days.

[@deltapope1]

volume kinda low, must blow up my speakers to hear anything x)

[@darklight6921]

same

[@RKO1988]

It was fine on my iPhone …

[@brandonwombacher2559]

Buy a Amplifier.

[@deltapope1]

@@brandonwombacher2559 volume on video is actually fairly low. It's just this video though

[@SwitchB]

Great point on what woman don't see 👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿

[@D97mgtow]

When you stop to truly consider just what womens bodies are designed for, to make and produce other human beings it’s little wonder how much of their behaviour and instincts are tied into this purpose. By extension it’s even less of a wonder as to why they are so enslaved to these instincts. For men reproduction is a momentary thing, sex doesn’t always lead to a baby and when it doesn’t then the pleasure is had, you go back to normal things. However when it does then that’s when you assume your responsibility which comes naturally as well but there’s a great deal of learning involved too. Men are certainly subject to their instincts as well but they have greater ability to recognise and overcome them.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

"...they have a greater ability to recognise and overcome them."...🤣..oops. Well, sometimes maybe.

[@deltaxcd]

why men need to overcome their instincts? It is not like there is any reason to do that for anyone what you need to do is to use your brain to optimize your instincts and pleasure

[@genestone4951]

Women's entire existence is focused on various objects entering and/or exiting their bodies. That's got to be weird.

[@deltaxcd]

@@genestone4951 No, entire female existence is focused on fear and paranoia like constant worrying if there is enough milk in the fridge or if her child will not die from starvation because its already 5 minutes after regular feeding time.

[@lukehunnable]

Not really. The opposite can be argued quite easily. Seeing as men crave sex vastly more than women, men are slaves to their libido.

[@clarkkent8286]

We never really got along, we just tolerated each other for the sake of reproduction

[@dasuero7489]

I love just observing how a little girl plays because I have a 2 or 3yo niece whom I dearly love. I love her more than I do love actual grown vvomen as I’m indifferent to them. Her eyes and face lights up and she jumps for joy when she learns something novel and is curious about it. Learning through a child’s eye is interesting. Admittedly, she’s a handful. I wish that inquisitive energy could stay for her when she gets older and when I’m not around. Actual vvomen though aren’t as playful and curious about things and their environment. I do dread that she was born at this time rather than much earlier, at least before Gen Z or Y, would have been bit better

[@dasuero7489]

@The Inkwell Nah I don’t go that far, I’m not actually like that. That’s just creepy plus when a child gets older to, say 16 but you’re much older than them then I think that’s jailbait or whatever. Funny joke though and I’m not trying to get arrested or on a watch list. I just didn’t know how to word what I said correctly so it probably came off as creepy which is not what I intended at all. I meant for it to be positive, not creepily and not weirdly

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

@@dasuero7489 Men are always complaining that women are impossible to understand yet, they are always seeking out a companion with the words, "My wife (person of committment) doesn't understand me." This will help you : There are always exceptions and as we grow to be more of a narcissistic society there will be mor of it but generally speaking, little girls are sugar and spice, all things nice; little boys are made of snips(eels) and snails and puppy-dog tails. I would have said pulling legs and wings off houseflies.

[@dasuero7489]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 Sure, except for me I’m not at that age where I can say I have married and have a child. I’ve stayed single but I’ve desired intimacy and some sex. But mostly intimacy and trust and commitment is what I look for, someone to talk and share passions and interests and to care for. Nowadays, that seems lacking or virtually absent. Whenever I would talk to a girl back then, I could only relate a bit or more often what would happen is that I’d be turned down and ignored and seen as weird and creepy like if I didn’t say much or stared off, it would be like I was planning something devious for a girl or anybody. When the truth is I can’t hurt anybody because I’m physically frail and skinny. I’ve done my fair share of hitting or hurting people because I lost composure or acted selfishly but who doesn’t. We all have our breaking points. Then again, that’s not the point I made here. Also, are you a vvoman or a male. Can’t tell

[@deltaxcd]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 little girls are sugar and spice and grown up women are made of fear and paranoia :) Yes exception do happen but men operate on probabilities and women on possibilities

[@DonManuelConLeonsJacket]

​@DR Asuero Judging by their username, their nonsensical 1st paragraph, the middle paragraph of: "Exceptions exist", & the last paragraph of: "Boys r the only cruel ones".. I'm guessing it's a voman xD. Nevertheless I agree with the narcissitic societal shift bc of more broken homes being common.

[@aftabsayed2825]

I don't think will get along anymore Either in the Future.... This a point of no return !! And i love it !! 😊

[@THETRIVIALTHINGS]

Things have been made this way so the few at the top can profit off of both.

[@Dev-qs2yb]

Very informative video for the blue pilled lads!

[@deltaxcd]

Actually nothing changed that much. In the olden times women were looking for a man to fulfill her dream now she can fulfill it herself. But the dream of woman always was to have money and status. directly or indirectly. that's the only topic they understand.

[@umbriferus]

Another example in my eyes more for humans in general are not built for large scale society. Because when we were still hunter and gatherers all members of a tribe would help everywhere, which included women hunting, which in turn negated the effects of the cognitive disconnect we experience together. Due to men and women having similar life and day to day experience, which is almost impossible with today’s society and self imposed divide between the genders started and perpetuated by the abrahamic religions in most modern first world countries.

[@TristanWintle]

All in all it comes down to this: women have an ingroup preference and want superiority over men, and men are divided among those who have an outgroup preference toward women, those who don't care and are only concerned with personal advancement, and those who want to abolish female superiority, the latter group being a tiny minority of men.

[@jackrubyshat]

Great video as always. Is there any chance of increasing the volume of your videos upon recording/uploading?

[@ssing7113]

This is why I even laugh at the notion of men and women being friends. Someone’s using someone at the end of the day as it’s not mutual ever

[@BEYOND-EGO]

Lols it’s funny before I was even red pill, when I propose to a women and she wanted to friend zone me and say we could be friends I would laugh a lot on their face, and say me and you friends, it was always funny women believe they can even be friends with men,

[@markaurelius61]

Never is too strong. In a sophisticated society (ours is not one) the sexes would learn about each other and our behaviour would be more appropriate and more respectful toward each other.

[@33Crazydude]

There is no doubt it's bad, and worse it will continue to get

[@ronweed2030]

Error in this argument at the root. This argument presents a faulty position for explaining differences (the root reason). Another error - nit picking - the bromide: life is unfair. Life - existence - is a state of being. That application of a sentient motive is in error. People can be unfair. Is that difference made clear? A clue: because humans make society a game - there is incentive to propagate things that create advantage for gaming outcome. The far greater expenditure on women's development you mentioned, is a desired outcome, by those who seek to create gaming advantage. Various interest groups form in gaming social environment. They push for advantage. Wealthy people push for tax advantages. Corporations use lobbyists and bribes - we - donations to gain gaming advantage. Religious groups push for tax exemption. The examples go on and on. In fact there are people interested in pitting groups against groups for gaming outcome. Can men and women get along? Yes, in a different kind of social organization.

[@DonManuelConLeonsJacket]

U talking bout the sabotevrs & the js?

[@mrboombasticgaylordwaterso9297]

Men and some neither better or worse just two puzzle pieces from a different puzzle. Neither scratched or worn... Just different.

[@daisukegori2112]

I learned this long ago. And no it did not make me hate women. It made me less upset. As I now understand them even if they refuse to understand themselves.

[@therealjohndoe3862]

Well, when having a man to protect you in the face of threats to your very survival actually means you do survive, it sure changes the equation. That's one of many dynamics that kept the species moving forward from a biological point of view for thousands of years.

[@Kaodite]

Your audio has increasingly sucked. I'm a longtime fan who listens while driving. I need higher audio to hear your voice. I got 30s in and couldn't discern a word, so I went on to another creator. If the volume is too high, we can always turn down. If my audio is maxed on my sound system and the KZbin app, I can't do much. I love you but please fix this shit. Signed, A loving supporter

[@thijsjong]

What are your favorite rpgs?

[@dasuero7489]

Somebody asking the real pertinent questions here

[@interesting2491]

The internet and evil sin/behaviour plays a part in my opinion

[@pbonfanti]

My grandmother had 13 surviving children, internet did not existed in that time...

[@interesting2491]

@@pbonfanti And your point is?

[@artemisgruis1528]

The answer to women's enigma as a whole is pregnancy.

[@philyeary8809]

Nah.

[@domen1154]

I don't get what are you trying to say.

[@artemisgruis1528]

@@domen1154 KZbin deleted my reply, god damned totalitarians.

[@deltaxcd]

No longer an issue because we have contraceptive pills

[@artemisgruis1528]

@@deltaxcd I really consider women that take the pill and have liberal ideas to be no longer women but some sort of wretched creature. I guess we have a shortage of women. I think we are coming to the end of the empires of the modern era. I think only those societies that perhaps are not as prosperous but have more sound and healthy moral and social paradigms will be the ones creating families and surviving by means natural population growth. We tend to think that the more education and knowledge we have the better we are, but it is the man that are more prone to self denial for the good of their fellow men to be the best among us. And I have noticed that the gift of self denial is not present in women as much as in men since in their natural state they are selfish, pampered and morally lax when compated to most men. Of course there are exceptions but these are just exceptions. To give them knowledge and to give them the same rights as men is to turn them into deformed amoral versions of quasi-men with no accountability, sense of Honor or capacity to self denial. For the most part, real woman are those which submit either to her husband or father and thereby reach spiritual maturity and greatness through the bearing and rearing of children always under the guidance of their respective spouse. I don't believe that women of develop ed countries will forfeit their current political and reproductive Rights, and for this reason I believe that these societies are at the point of no return and doomed for failure.

[@last_samurai6690]

If you have women in your life, try the best to get along. The rest you might really ignore. Or just keep it casual, to the minimum necessary. I have a mother, 3 sisters, a wife and 3 daughters. Luckily so far we all get along and that all I care about. My boss is a lady,nor CEO is a lady, I have lady colleagues, I do not need any interactions with those beyond the minimum to get the work done. If you are not married or in relationship and still looking that might be a different story.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

Interesting point of view. - just getting along. Better than fighting.What would it be like with a father, 3 brothers, a wife and three sons?

[@last_samurai6690]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 actually I come from a large family. So I have 4 brothers and also two sons. I also had a father until the age of 40. We kind of get along except the usual casual family drama. I am more close to one sister and one brother, for no apparent raison. Maybe the age for my brother. This gender war does not make sense in a family settings.

[@johannschultz3743]

Daran dachte ich auch. Wir reden die ganze Zeit aneinander vorbei

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

And you are two men! (Und sie sind zwei Männer!)

[@gtanists6350]

Perfectly articulated

[@RKO1988]

Beautiful analysis as always.

[@darklight6921]

those men are considered sub human

[@browpetj]

Farmers in Scotland seem to be the most cooperative and successful. I mean successful as in actually make money by having a spouse rather than spend it and actually enjoy the relationship. I never hear of anyone from that community compalining or divorcing. I guess it is visceral seeing the work done and having price of crops grown/animals reared variable. Dopamine correction is built in to this system. The gender roles are also liked and accepted socially. Also, farmers are never together long except at meals and the guy is too tired at night to 'bother' the woman! Ha ha ha. But they think they are together cos most see eachother regularly throughout the day. Or at least know what the other one is doing all day and that they are close by. Again though, really not worth the squeeze... Farming is high risk and often low return.

[@ROForeverMan]

You should use a better microphone. I barely hear what you are saying.

[@fillfinish7302]

Relationships have rules .same applies to men and women whese these become obsolete or twisted it crashes.

[@heroldjaras9909]

females and males are too different, both want different things....men want polygamy and many females and bedroom fun without commitment, females want commitment and security hypergamy the best male and only one and after she has his commitment, the bedroom fun decreases. there wont be a solution to solve this, but going your own way with casual relationships and paying for bedroom fun is a good way to counter females commitment marriage strategy/divorce courts/hypergamy/female nature

[@truthseekingfreethinker5214]

I think you have it backwards. Don't listen to what people say they want look at how they conduct their lives. You will see that men want commitment and women just want to have fun until its too late.

[@IvanPolyansky]

@@truthseekingfreethinker5214 agreed, it’s actually backwards. Everything in this Matrix is turned upside down

[@fillfinish7302]

Not any more u still live in the 19 century.

[@pbonfanti]

Females don't want commitment, they start most of the divorces, they just want your resources, if they can take from you and leave, they do it.

[@deltaxcd]

@@truthseekingfreethinker5214 That's complete nonsense. women and fun don't do together ever. I never met a woman who woud be fun or interested in fun. the only "fun' that woman is interested in is being treated like queen and entertained by jesters.

[@elinope4745]

I get along fine with them so long as they are civil and don't want a close relationship with me. I understand, get along and love the girls much more than the women though.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

What do you classify as "close"? Girls vs Women. At what age do girls become women? All women were girls once. Just like all men were boys once.

[@Zzzzlmo]

You definitely have to do a video about she/her they/them trans etc…

[@philyeary8809]

Tired of the simplicity of the Alphabet People.

[@dasuero7489]

Stardusk should pin your comment

[@quirinoguy8665]

Yeah It would be interesting to see his take about the Alphabet people.

[@daisukegori2112]

Women as a majority enjoy having things inserted into them. Men as a majority do not. It could not be any more clear.

[@pulsaran]

lol yeah, ones a women sayd : men are from Mars and women are from Venus. My comment : At least Mars is viable for supporting life. omg that face hehe I ones had a talk with a guy about men and women, i saw also the problem for women to select lets say a women has a man to choose from of every finger she has. Then you get the paradox of choice. To much choice makes it that you cant make a choice (its also a problem for youth that's growing up and have to select a study for the rest of there life and have so much choice these days that they cant make a choice) Then also factor in the crap women have been told by feminists and so on and so forth.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

Please note, that it was a man who wrote those words, "Men are from Mars" and Mars is not viable for supporting life. As things stand at the moment, it is all a matter of supposition and conjecture. But you are right with having too much choice unless of course you are a chinese male whose govt. policies have interferred so much that little baby girls were murdered in preference for males because of the "one child family" and now there is a lack of females. Good for the females now but doesn't help then men

[@deltaxcd]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 mas is more viable for life than venus where anything will be cooked immediately :) even robots can't survive on venus

[@pulsaran]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 it is not only because of one child policy. Men are must take care of the parents when they grow older and women don't. But of course that dos not fit the feminist narrative. When either sex is doing bad its bad for the other.

[@davedogge2280]

Ask yourself, are some dogs out there more higher status than some men ? I would certainly say they are viewed as such by many. Now why is that ? some home truths voiced in the video above that you will never hear in mainstream media

[@unrelentingspirit6888]

Is this the real Roland Rat!?

[@davedogge2280]

@@unrelentingspirit6888 the very same one

[@scr4932]

The dogpill reigns supreme.

[@unrelentingspirit6888]

@@davedogge2280 Prometheus - A Very Gentle Introduction to The Dissident Right

[@davedogge2280]

@@Zenoandturtle I think most intelligent men know this. You'll be last in her priorities, the kids may not like you, if they do like you the relationship breaks if it breaks with their mother and worst of all you may be expected to pay for the kids and raise them !

[@williamsaloka9043]

Men and Woman "getting along" is just a Myth.

[@tnix80]

I was in a relatively useless woke class, but i saw how the Africans lived and i got to wondering about things like the rat race.

[@lilreeseakathechiraqgrimre1995]

Racism

[@bryanmiller8604]

Dr. John B. Calhoun, proved this with his Utopia Experiment, so long ago. Yet we continue on with our species self destructive behavioral nature, rather than take the time to seek, & cultivate enlightenment from the precious, simple moments in our lives, instead, we seek every form of distraction in order to temporarily appease our ego. Such behavior can only lead one to further suffering, & despair.

[@ricardomilos3464]

Men and women get along, for the most part, when there's patriarchy. Yes, women don't always like it, but its no different from children and parents. Yes, children don't like being controlled, either, but at the end of the day, theres nothing they can do about it, so they accept it for the most part. And yes, even with patriarchy, its often better to be a woman, just like it's often better to be a child, because even though you're property, the brains of women and children don't need as much to be happy, hence why even in the middle east, men still commit 2x as many suicides as women, (in the west it's 4x) Im not even saying, "patriarchy good" "matriarchy bad" I don't give a shit, aside from obviously how it affects ME if there's patriarchy or matriarchy. But If men and women are to get a long without patriarchy, well need to greatly alter our genetic makeup to make us more equal. Either masculize women, or feminize men.

[@lukeoldfield7940]

"Either masculize women, or feminize men." this seems to be exactly the direction society is going in?

[@tanura5830]

Feminizing men would be very don't think equal balance would work

[@ricardomilos3464]

@@tanura5830 I said masculize women or feminize men

[@tanura5830]

@@ricardomilos3464 yes i meant males

[@keonkla]

@@lukeoldfield7940 ya but normie men and woman who cheer this on all of a sudden when getting into a relationship with a newage male or woman realise that is not at all attractive or even worth it in the end. to many masculine woman think being a angry tyrant is being "strong" and to many men think being feminine means being weak,a man child who doesn't take care of himself,incompetent. Ive seen men who are just simply a feminine man child crying about how woman only want alphas, Nah Woman want men who actually can do things himself and doesn't need a mother. It goes both ways with women tho. Woman seem to cry that they can't be strong without men being insecure but in realiity being heavily masculine woman the only men who will be with her are feminine me and thus will just leave her fustrated most of the time. Yet men who are actually worth and have a spine won't bother with her anyway lol.

[@GearlessJoe0]

Yeah it’s not like there was a time where they got along right?

[@coolmancoolman164]

🎧

[@empemitheos]

you sound like you would be the type of person who likes fantasy role playing

[@stub4488]

The only thing matters to women today is money and Status.

[@kindasus6915]

Nope, all I want is a man that I can love for the rest of my life. No sexism. No money. I just want us both to be happy. I hope you'll also find a loving woman!💗

[@kmg501]

Audio extremely low.

[@yoyo762]

He whispers alot.

[@Tom_Quixote]

Am I the only one who thought the women of Witcher 3 were somewhat unattractive, and even the sorceresses were kind of bland looking?

[@martinavaslovik3433]

Complete understanding between the sexes is not possible.

[@jedirun]

very different indeed

[@uomodonore245]

Early on this video.

[@brofrombrum8502]

Or… Maybe, just maybe Islam was right? ;-)

[@Leptyzz]

You liked your own comment

[@potheadraccoon8536]

@@Leptyzz i liked his comment just now hope that changes something in your eyes

[@Leptyzz]

@@potheadraccoon8536 changes nothing

[@ModernWanderer]

First!

[@poiutrew]

As you say; men & women talk & walk past each other: Not untrue, yet the same hinderence to the perceiving of others could largely be said to afflict everyone, male/female. To some extent we're all trapped in a body with our experiences to help make sense of everything; which we then employ to make sense off others. There's usually a lot off room for assumptions & a reliance on generalisations & tradition; which rarely give us a fair understanding of another. As we stand, M & W get processed through the sausage machine of life until they're adequately prepared for the world of jobs & everything else 'expected' from life; at which point their outlooks have been set in stone. MGTOW as part of school curriculums seems to be the only solution I can see; educate children of the shortcomings of being human - know yourself. That way we'd at least be arming future generations with a more realistic set of expectations of life & other people. We all know which of the sexes would likely object to that, & why: That really would be cutting off a nose to spite a face. If it could be normalised, however, achieve consensus; women might be more likely to entertain it. It would actually benefit them to hear about the wall etc; they need reality pointing out or they can't see it for the trees.

[@carolleenkelmann4751]

You are forgetting one thing, the physiological differences in the sexes. As for education in schools being a part of the curriculum - in a Biology class, maybe but separate. Sex education in schools is about as successful as a psycologist giving psychotherapy. There are more psychologists themselves in need of therapy. Fancy putting someone in charge of teaching this in schools. You'd get the mess that you are now seeing.

[@poiutrew]

@@carolleenkelmann4751 For sure, it would be grasping at straws, but living in cloud cuckoo land with a fairy tale narrative isn't serving us too well. Forearmed is forewarned, though - knowledge is power. Any interference with the lives of others will always sow some degree of chaos; I wish I'd had access to the Canon of evo' bio' or MGTOW as a youth - it would have saved me a lot of time & honed my life choices, however it was applied. There is always a plan B, though: Something akin to the Golgafrinchams' space ship.

[@mountainmgtow5421]

Your audio needs work.

[@LeeroyPorkins]

Remember kids, it was the Woman that the Serpent promised Godhood too and the Woman proceeded to HEARD the Serpent when she got caught.

[@tizodd6]

Three hundred forty ninth!