WINNIE THE POOH: BLOOD & HONEY - A Terrible Horror Movie

[@ElvistheAlien]

Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS/ANDROID/PC: clcr.me/Jun23_ElvisTheAlien and get a special starter pack with an Epic champion ⚡ Tallia ⚡Available only for new players

[@Looptoo]

You should review the American pie movies please and thank you

[@tdw1127]

@@Looptoo That’s actually a good idea

[@TheSsjJoker]

I know it would be terrible 😅

[@HappyEvil666]

Tigger's not in the movie because the character will not be in public domain until 2024.

[@JustStop19]

Promoting gambling, nice job, unsub.

[@chansell15]

This movie proves that just because you can do something doesn't mean you should

[@waltercomunello121]

the exact definition of "misinterpreting freedom of speech"

[@SwiftNimblefoot]

So true.

[@ghostme1635]

So true

[@PinaKoalaGaming]

“Insert Jurassic Park quote here!”

[@chasehedges6775]

@@PinaKoalaGaming So preoccupied with wether or not you could that you didn’t stop to think if you should.

[@Rozza2k]

They legitimately tried to say they starved when pooh is famous for finding honey and the rabbit grows his own carrots 😂

[@ikuvera]

LMAO

[@KillerJoke87]

yeah i know right

[@Emisop]

Not even just carrots he has a whole garden of various veggies XD

[@dumbsow9420]

​@@EmisopIn the movie it said they starved in winter. Which I assume maybe they couldn't grow?

[@ElFreakinCid]

Not just finding honey, GORGING on honey. Tubby lil' mofo sucks down a whole jar of the stuff in seconds and then happily inquires about there being more.

[@lissienicole7355]

I believe the three characters left out, including Tigger were because the copyright on those characters hasn’t run out yet. I remember seeing that as the explanation on many review videos for this movie, but if that’s not the case or you have more evidence to prove my claim feel free to comment 👍🏻 Edit: did not expect this comment to get this many comments XD

[@BohoAstronaut0819]

Yes that's right. Including poohs iconic outfit.

[@darsh8964]

@@BohoAstronaut0819 Oh bother

[@froggy5748]

Yeah plus his little red shirt is still under copyright, which is why they had to give pooh the hick outfit.

[@belledfox5369]

I was gonna come here and say this.

[@Npence09]

I was coming to say this! 😂

[@Erdosign]

If they were only going to have Pooh speak two words throughout the whole thing, it's kind of disappointing they weren't "Oh, bother!"

[@KillerJoke87]

well crud

[@cartooncritique6625]

I think they might have run into issues with Disney if they had him say that.

[@azaanimations319]

You can’t copyright dialogue, right?

[@hylianflower9681]

FR 😅😅😅

[@nakedmario9359]

When he was going to get hit by a car "Ho bother"

[@serenitythesiren5031]

Fun fact: the thing they whipped Chris with? That wasn't just a lock of hair. It was Eeyore's tail.

[@Necromancer0225]

Oh bother 😭

[@UZero1997]

"they went back to their animalistic ways" proceeds to show them driving cars, weilding tools and dressing up.

[@augusto2006-amg]

Despite the horrible plot, I guess we can all agree that the marketing team behind it made a pretty good job. Posters of the movie were literally everywhere

[@Wonderfully_Wicked6664]

Damn I missed that didn't know this movie was a thing until all the youtubers I watch reviewed it. Its some what safe under this rock!

[@augusto2006-amg]

@@Wonderfully_Wicked6664 Well they made a lot of money that's why they are able to make a sequel

[@Wonderfully_Wicked6664]

@@augusto2006-amg well hopefully they do better storytelling in the next one.

[@mitchellhouser1572]

Yeah, the marketing was pretty solid considering me my relatively normie brother both heard about it like a year before it came out and remembered it. I think they did a really popular Reddit post where we both heard about it.

[@Army_Dog]

It's pretty clear from the plot that it was just going to be a regular slasher film and then they decided to make it Winnie the Pooh to make some extra cash

[@zeebeereactions]

"Piglet, NOOOOOOOO!" will forever be my favorite horror movie quote!

[@Akursedtime]

The animation at the start is far more interesting than the rest of the movie.

[@JEvans-wy9ln]

Eeyore holds a special place in my heart. Hes the first character that i learned sympathy from, everytime he showed up looking sad i just wanted to give him a big hug

[@hylianflower9681]

I agree ❤😢

[@ElFreakinCid]

While he was never my favourite growing up, I still always loved him particularly because my late grandpa's voice sounded like a happy version of Eeyore. I appreciate him much more as an adult too, and since my grandpa's passing, I've felt even closer to him. :'c

[@liamramos1285]

This movie didn’t give Eeyore justice. I demand justice for the donkey.

[@remoryu]

the way elvis goes “well he summoned the bees of course” really gets to me

[@TheGary108]

Nicholas Cage’s greatest enemy.

[@aporue5893]

elvis could write a better movie,I truly believe that.

[@rebekahscheu4245]

NOT THE BEES!

[@ovgem]

when elvis said pooh should've been shorter, i immediately imagine pooh and piglet being little people and they figure out creative ways to gruesomely kill and torture people despite their disadvantage, like piglet standing on pooh's shoulders to feed a prisoner in their cellar through a mail slot or something.

[@buberrycrunch]

This comment has me dying!!! 😭😭

[@jadenbryant9283]

And More winnie the pooh like

[@geekbro6265]

damn id watch that!

[@c0zmozys]

that soundz so silly lol

[@pessien8474]

Like chucky essentially?

[@Sub-Zero8]

To clarify why Pooh didn’t have the usual voice he’s famous for is because apparently Jim Cummings threatened to sue the film if they made Pooh sound anything like his interpretation of the character’s voice in the movie

[@morgaena3313]

As he should

[@Dreigonix]

What a fucking gigachad. Holy crap.

[@TheAMVDorf]

Makes sense, he cares a lot about the character, just seeing one interview with him related to Pooh shows that. I once saw one where he’s doing the voice and he says “damn”, and immediately regrets it and says “Pooh would never say that, that’s too mean”. The guy cares about what the character represents for children, and I respect him for it.

[@LoganWH8]

Have you ever noticed that no one ever calls Winnie the Pooh by his actual first name? They call him Pooh, Pooh bear, or address him by his full name, but nobody ever calls him Winnie.

[@iso-didact789]

Because it's a female name. He was named after two animals at the London zoo: a female black bear Winnipeg, and a swan Pooh.

[@iso-didact789]

@aduckofsomesort Winnipeg. After a black bear at the London zoo and a swan named Pooh.

[@xstar4698]

Me: WINNIE POOH! Pooh: wtf Me: POOH WINNIE WINNIE POOH

[@danieldietrich9969]

Also, what is a "Pooh"? Since he's referred to as "THE Pooh", like Barney THE Dinosaur or Sylvester THE Cat.

[@iso-didact789]

@@danieldietrich9969 He was named after two real animals: a black bear at the London zoo named Winnipeg, and a swan named pooh.

[@frogfan449]

it is really terrible that people think the edgiest thing to make with a public domain fiction is to make the innocent creatures be scary murderers. the most transgressive and great thing you can do in my opinion is to just make more of a good thing as if it never stopped being made

[@ljoanshevchenko5884]

^^^ honestly!

[@thatgirlinautumn5995]

I think it’s mostly a budget question, honestly. Some of the most iconic horror movies have been made on a minuscule budget, that’s just not possible with proper animation and such

[@kylenielsen5083]

It's a bit surface level. Based more on the image of innocence rather than why that image was so stringently upheld (Disney wanting to be too clean for controversy and subsequent loss of revenue).

[@Tequilawolfman]

Oh shut up

[@M.S.Y.C]

mickey will be in public domain in 2024 there's DEFINITELY gonna be a horror movie on mickey pretty soon, i will not be surprised

[@enerioffutt1881]

I think it would have been better if Pooh, Piglet, Eyore, Rabbit and Owl, all kept accidentally killing people, while trying to help, and Pooh kept saying, "Oh bother," each time. Or else the heffalump was killing and they were trying to stop it.

[@Kster-uj6dr]

That's hilarious

[@iclynnx]

Naw not the heffalump, I loved them in the movie where Roo meets them and becomes forbidden friends. My childhood would cry tears enough to fill a pool!

[@KerReeeee]

​@@iclynnxMaybe woozles?

[@hhfggvogtthehy6451]

This is literally if every dark parody of Winnie The Pooh was a movie.

[@Lutherstrode17492]

Legally we can more than just horror movies starring Pooh. Imagine if someone made an superhero movie about Winnie-the-Pooh called “Winnie-the-Pooh: No Honey At Home.”

[@SwiftNimblefoot]

Except, completely unfunny for a parody.

[@corban0the1]

@@Lutherstrode17492 pooh wrath of honey

[@Lutherstrode17492]

@@corban0the1 Pooh: Honey and Money

[@webbyishere]

I think meat canyons parody was much more entertaining

[@GoodTimeForARoll]

This movie was so traumatic for me, I grew up with these characters so to see them starving and weak was deeply upsetting and made me sad

[@noahwoodard3034]

I didn't necessarily grow up with these characters, but to see such wholesome characters so full of hate makes me sad

[@jvillain9946]

Traumatized? Really?

[@drippyog3935]

Puzzy

[@glitch-tv7504]

This could’ve worked better if it was about stalker fans of Christopher Robin who believed they were the real Winnie the Pooh characters stalking Christopher Robin and sacrificing people to him.

[@christinastokes5534]

I'd watch that

[@itsjustmaddisen]

Oddly, I prefer this idea lol. It would make the costumes make sense.

[@owens.studios]

I honestly thought they were guys in costumes until Elvis said they were actual animals- your idea works perfectly

[@skyshunts]

That would have been better than this crap and more interesting

[@hylianflower9681]

OMG YESS

[@ElizabetaHedervayHungary]

This movie just has all the clichés we're so used to seeing in horror movies that we've ended up despising them: * Women-and-kids-do-dumb-sh*t-to-push-the-plot cliché * They-try-to-hide-but-get-found-easily cliché * Background-information-you-think-will-be-useful-later-but-isn't cliché * The-unkillable-monster cliché * Just-stands-there-to-be-killed cliché * Bimbos-on-vacation-in-spooky-setting cliché * Runs-out-of-bullets-when-you-need-them-the-most cliché And my personal least favourite: * The-car-won't-start-when-you-need-it-to cliché

[@LadyOfTheEdits]

This is why I just can't watch these movies.

[@Coffmanantics]

Phones "unusable" cliche

[@AamuAurora]

They could have made Eeyore into this great nihilistic depressed villain, a psychopathic leader of the group.

[@VixxyCopeland]

My biggest issue with the movie was the random college girls. I literally did not care about any of them. Honestly, I feel like I would have liked the movie more if the first ten minutes were about this random group of girls Pooh and Pigglet slaughtered. And that set up the blood lust of the characters. Then the rest of the movie is about Chris and his fiance finding Pooh. Like we would get some Lore and what happened to the rest of the group.

[@bo2720]

​@chandllerburse737I see your point but I did feel like the actresses were not bad at all given the script/lines. They were all pretty natural

[@chaoticklutz3633]

About the Tigger moment: Disney allowed everyone else in the cast to be up for Public Domain but still hold the rights to Tigger for a while longer. My guess is that it is due to him being the second most recognizable character from the series that Disney still has marketing rights over, so once those are up then he'll join them too. Edit: Correction - it is due to copyright issues revolving around licensing imaging/dating, thank you LUNARIS

[@lunaris7342]

Its actually not Disney. The original Book is in public domain now while Tigger and Co werent introduces until later Books so their copyright is still active. Disney only holds the Copyright to their version of the Characters thats why their arent allowed to make them look similar to the Disney Version

[@ElvistheAlien]

Can't wait 😂

[@chaoticklutz3633]

@@lunaris7342 OOhhhh, gotcha! Well, we can still hope that in later time once those catch up he'll fall in, unless they plan on extending them out cause - they are Disney so why not

[@TF2CrunchyFrog]

Tigger is glad he was spared.

[@johnwarner4178]

@@TF2CrunchyFrogif I recall the video I saw explaining it he was introduced just a couple years later so he’ll probably be in the sequel or third one

[@shyawkward]

It feels like a movie like this needs to stand out on its own, not just piggyback off of the success of Whinny the Pooh. Perhaps a more clever spin on Pooh, maybe some more cosmic horror and the victims going insane. Perhaps the true monster being the idea of childhood-memory-twisting horror. Where each victim has their own interpretation of the monster.

[@KingOfGaymes]

I’m sorry but it’s spelled Winnie.. I’ve honestly never seen it spelled so off before.. 😭

[@TWOFIRSTNAMES.]

I would watch that definitely

[@midnightfiles]

The idea of a child befriending monsters, not realizing how dangerous they are, could work on it's own, imo. And by creating their own characters, they would have had more freedom with the project. Now this guy wants to do horror movies with Bambi, Peter Pan, even the Powerpuff Girls if he gets permission/rights to do it.

[@joeiorio9654]

One thing that really annoyed me was how the animals were just guys in suits. I was hoping we would get a Chucky scenario, where they would be little animatronics that go around killing people, but that would require effort

[@caliph95]

And money

[@joeiorio9654]

@@aduckofsomesort That would have been funny

[@skyshunts]

It's disappointing they could have done better than this but no they went with crap

[@littykitty040]

Fun fact: the reason Pooh can't wear the red shirt is because that was specifically a creation of Disney when they adapted the character. Copyright is weird

[@geinigegijs]

9:14 “Some pretty haunting shots of poo” had me laughing so hard 😂😂

[@Lutherstrode17492]

Kind of shocked no one in the movie said this: “Eat shit, Winnie-the-Crap.”

[@sharzinlalebazri5673]

I always had the pitch that a Winnie The Pooh horror film shouldn't twist the characters of the Hundred Acre Woods into generic murderers or monsters, but rather turn them into Christopher Robinson's schizophrenic hallucinations which he uses as a coping mechanism against whatever dark situation he is put in like being a victim of domestic abuse or being bullied and mistreated for said schizophrenia. This would justify using these specific characters over any other innocent characters from wholesome, child friendly properties. Edit: So apparently Christopher Robinson was a real person which would make any dark and fucked up twist involving him a majorly insensitive move. Sure, you can always argue that there is a layer of separation between the person and the character but I don't think we should go there.

[@LinksBetweenDrinks]

Buddy, slow down. To do that, you'd need a scriptwriter and an editor. Those cost money!

[@abhainn35]

I . . . I was just about to comment near the same thing. Winnie The Pooh would work so much better as a psycological horror over a slasher, but that would actually take effort. Edit: Okay, I've been thinking about this a little more, and I have a plot. One of the things I don't like about these "reimaginings" is that they take away every and all wholesomeness and make it over-the-top edgy instead. With Winnie the Pooh especially, it would be better to lean into it. You can still make it unsettling and I'm going to explain how. Start it off with Christopher Robinson playing with his stuffed animals. They're his comfort because he struggles to socialize with other kids. He even sees the stuffed animals as real people with lives, struggles, and personalties. Fast forward 14 years and he's 21. Everything in his life is falling apart: His parents are dead, he's in debt, he's losing friends, etc. Christopher becomes desperate for any kind of comfort, so he turns to his imaginary friends, but he believes they're real people, 100%. Winnie, Piglet, Tigger, and the others aren't malicious, conniving, or fake like humans. They have their pastel colors and bright smiles and always want to go on adventures. Christopher starts going insane. He can barely see the real world anymore, just the imaginary one in his head (maybe he even starts seeing himself as a stuffed animal or is physically TURNING INTO ONE- I'm sorry, I love transformation body horror). A couple comes into the woods for a trip, only to see a sickly man who doesn't look quite human. He hasn't cleaned himself in so long, nor has eaten. Real stuffed animals didn't need those things. They report it to the cops. The cops search the woods, only to find Chrisopher dead to the elements or starvation. Edit 2: I'm late to this, but since Christopher Robin is actually a real person, nevermind. Change the name.

[@siophecles]

Christopher Robin is a real guy, making up a story about how he was abused and schizophrenic is sorta weird. He's dead now, so he couldn't sue you or anything, but it would still be weird.

[@FaithoftheAir3]

I was JUST about to say the same thing. A psychological horror would have been much better and creepier then a slasher film -_-

[@sharzinlalebazri5673]

@@siophecles Really? Well you learn something new every day. In that case yeah, it WOULD be insensitive.

[@RedL1keRoses7]

This movie was possible to make because Pooh entered the public domain. The reason why Tigger and other characters weren’t in it is because they hadn’t entered the public domain yet. They’re from Disney’s rendition of it, not the original. Same goes for why he doesn’t have the short red top. The version of Pooh that entered the public domain didn’t wear clothes, but Disney’s version, which did have the red top, still hasn’t entered it, so they couldn’t use the likeness to that version. They could only use the elements from the original Winnie the Pooh as they are now in the public domain, but couldn’t use things that are missing as they have not yet entered it.

[@tsifirakiehl4250]

Oh, come on, movie writers! First of all, the original stories made it quite clear that the animals of the Hundred Acre Wood were fully capable of surviving without Christopher Robin around, and there was also a whole movie about him going to school and the animals not understanding what that was and going on an adventure to find him, and it ends with him finding them and explaining what school is, and they’re fine with that, so presumably he’d know to give them a heads-up about college. Second of all, if you want to make a horror twist on Winnie the Pooh, that’s fine, but it should at least be a recognizably Winnie the Pooh story! This is just a generic slasher movie where the killers happen to be named Pooh and Piglet.

[@zacharyrosemann]

Honestly, this whole premise isn't terrible, but the main problem is that they shove Christopher Robin aside and focus on this group of girls for a majority of the runtime It sucks too because if they had CR as a more prominent character, that scene in the end with Pooh would hit harder, "because you left us" would've been a badass twist of a line Idk, I hope the sequel focuses more on CR and build up an actual fight between him and Pooh

[@LeBearr]

A creepy Winnie like Pooh with a sketchbook or coralline artystyle would be scary

[@crowdemon_archives]

And a lot more interesting.

[@Joeg-yz1do]

Idk why there aren’t more horror movies in the uncanny valley

[@vrostar]

Imagine Cocaine Bear VS. Pooh like a Freddy VS. Jason style slasher movie.

[@apparitions2470]

i’d be cool to see a winnie the pooh movie in a similar fashion to the ‘where the wild things are’ movie showing a more darker creepier version of the story with heavier themes

[@lostinadifferentworld2752]

No it wouldn't

[@apparitions2470]

@chandllerburse737 i’ve never read the book but i believe so? sorry my comment was kind of confusing i meant it would’ve been cool if the winnie the pooh horror movie was taken more in the direction of a dark children’s story. It would have been more intriguing or at least creative to see them warp the original story into something darker, maybe Christopher Robin being lost in the 100 acre wood with animalistic monsters compared to a slasher with men in masks. That’s personally what I would have preferred in this kind of movie

[@garrettburke9035]

I'm a caregiver and my client loves Winnie the pooh and she freaked out when this movie came out she's like pooh wouldn't kill anyone haha

[@OddSifr]

Honestly, Chris' reaction at the end felt kinda coherent. When his fiancée was killed, yes, it was horrible and he probably irremediably hated Pooh for that, but on the other hand it was personal vengeance. Pooh attacked Chris and someone who mattered to him because hated Chris specifically. That last girl might've mattered more to Chris because he basically saved no one, even being somewhat responsible for his former friends' descent into madness, and she was his last chance to bring Pooh's humanity back to the surface while also his last chance to save anyone at all - his former friends' humanity, at least one of their prey... all that for nothing, as Pooh kills the last non-Chris survivor viciously to signal he's beyond help. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the film was good and deep - it's the whole opposite: it's an effin compilation of underexploited potential and missed opportunities. The final scene made me overthink because I genuinely wanted the film to be good and I'm still in denial that it's so terrible. Let's say that... that's how I cope?

[@47Cartoonguy]

I think you put more thought into this than the writers did

[@OddSifr]

@47Cartoonguy That's just how I cope from massive disappointment. I do wish they put more thought and love into the project.

[@rosestar1324]

Nah, he secretly hated his fiancé cuz she didn't cut the crust off his toast and she HAD to die for that transgression

[@SnizelOfficial]

They can't give him a tiny red shirt because Disney still owns the rights to Disney's depiction of the character. It's in public domain, but some elements Disney came up with are still off limits.

[@amanaolina2490]

The masks on Winnie the Pooh and Piglet were actually bought on Amazon. They didn't actually make those masks. So I thought that maybe the people behind this are too lazy to create horror versions of these characters, so they bought it off on Amazon. I would believe that since this is coming from a person who made a horror movie about a fucking Christmas tree.

[@_The_Archive_]

Fun Fact: Tigger was originally going to be in this film but he wasn't shown due the copyright of Disney.

[@Frawt]

It's the same with all the characters except for Pooh, Piglet and Cristopher Robin AFAIK, as those three recently entered the public domain. There are different rules for copyright and the public domain in the US, but for Tigger, the copyright was still in effect when this movie was shot and released. Fun fact is that Tigger will be entering the public domain (from what I understand) this year, so if they ever make a sequel to this movie, they can include Tigger in it.

[@lunaris7342]

Its actually not because of Disney the original Book is in public domain now while Tiggers first appearance was in a later Book. His Copyright runs out next Year

[@tomboyraider1015]

So why couldn't the filmmakers wait a few years if they wanted to feature all Pooh chracters in the movie? Pooh, Piglet and Tigger could've been featured all together then.

[@BluebirdThekingoftrains1671]

It would be appear in the sequel

[@rosskuhlman]

From what I have read, they did not include Tigger because they cant do so legally. Pooh and Piglet entered the public domain when they started making this movie, but Tigger was created later and his copyright hasn't expired yet.

[@CheshireAnn]

Honestly, I think that the concept of a Whinny the Pooh horror movie would be incredible if done correctly. There were many other ways that this movie could’ve been better! #1 : They could’ve done it with the animals all being large and creepy creatures of the forest, commanded by a child Christopher Robin, which would be the whole “tiny friend/child with protective/scary/giant friend/guardian” and could’ve branched onto other things; like his parents could be concerned and everything and be hunted by the hundred acre gang. #2 : They could’ve done the trope of living doll/toy, which could’ve been like the chucky movies, or even like the movie MEGAN, where they could’ve killed to “protect Christopher Robin. #3 : They could’ve done a kind of body horror, where Chris and the gang are all happy and peaceful, but it has a kind of uncanny and just overall unsettling vibe the whole time because of the animals/animal-humans design (like a impossibly and overly obese Pooh from all the honey, A saggy and stitched up eeyore, and such else).

[@entwixed3406]

They should've focused more on the past with Christopher and the others, honestly. The idea of them being outcasts and "freaks" could've been established a lot better, and it likely would have felt a LOT more real for them becoming insane. Honestly the best thing a sequel could do is THAT- focus on the past, and have a part two-styled thing focused on Pooh going after Christopher-

[@NeumanProductions]

As i recall, Tigger is not public domain yet. And Disney still owns the rights to a Pooh with red shirt. Like a the character itself can be public, but the specific interpretation of said character is not.

[@matthewbibby8921]

Missed opportunities; Piglet either being a tiny Chuckie-like fella or super fat like Elvis said. Pooh drowning somebody in a honey jar. Tiger exploding somebody's head by bouncing on it with his tail (I know, copyright issues, but still) Kanga "taking care" of somebody like she did with Piglet, but ACTUALLY horrifying somehow (maybe Roo died so she's got a bunch of dead people she's tried to "replace" him with but keeps messing up somehow) Somebody getting stuck in Gopher's hole before dying. Somebody being impaled by the north pole. A hephalumps nightmare sequence. And most egregiously; Pooh saying "oh bother" right before or after he's about to kill or be killed.

[@kaynine9]

Fun fact: The hair Pooh whips Chris with is actually Eor’s tail 😊

[@AngrySecs]

Fun fact: this fact wasn't fun

[@amirahdavids3247]

?????????........

[@kelliecarmichael2539]

"Because I'm ugly and pissed" is my new go-to explanation for anything I do ever

[@MikatheVoidStar]

Actually, they could not use the look of him wearing that short red shirt, since the copyright that expired was for the original Winnie the Pooh, who didn't wear anything. Same with tigger, who's copyright didn't expire when this movie was made. In fact, Tigger's copyright expires around the time that the Second movie is going to be made. Roo and Kanga is probably the same.

[@yann6109]

There's a lot to say about this movie, but one thing that caught my attention was - why Eeyore's bones were there AND Eeyore's grave? What did they put in there? Or did they just move the earth for it to look like a grave???

[@HarveMoone]

Honestly with the way Christopher Robin behaves with such a naive and borderline infantile response to clear signs of danger in the beginning of the movie just makes me want to head canon the idea that the fairytale character Christopher Robin himself was suddenly thrown into a horror twist like a fucked up version of Enchanted. It would explain why he’s confused but not put off by the environment and only being concerned for his friends. Bc he’s a fairytale character and something like danger, murder and fear isn’t conceivable in his world and he doesn’t react as quickly as his fiancé does to being afraid or hiding or he just stands there screaming like a petrified child as she’s being murdered. This is fucking inconceivable to him. Honestly feel like that’s such a cool horror concept for a _GAME_ I’d watch Jack play the shit out of that

[@kojinooni]

Piglet is an armadillo. Rabbit is a farmer. Tigger and Pooh make the most sense to eat Eeyore. They are all stuffed animals in the 100 acre woods. It would make more sense to have Christopher Robins dress up in costume and be the stalker after years of mental degradation and tough times from not having his imaginary friends to comfort him through relations and hardships. Plot twist it's some crazy dude who thinks he is Chris and he escaped the imprisonment he was in this explains the stalker.

[@AnormalLifeisboring]

I think having it as literal Winnie the Pooh and not just a murderer in a Winnie the Pooh costume when it's so obviously fake is the main problem with this movie (that and all the stereotypical horror movie protagonist mistakes) I mean they could have used cgi for the actual bear or just had a serial killer use him as inspiration either way would have been creepier.

[@Moofshire]

Its crazy that Elvis mentioned People Ruin Everything lol. Completely forgot about that series

[@Thathorrorguy12FU]

Piglet is usually little cute stuttering bff of Pooh. In the movie he grew horns and snorts and growls demonic.lol😂😂😂

[@incredibryce]

Making a Pooh horror movie is like making a John Wick for kids. Two opposing ideas collide, ruining our childhoods.

[@KumaoftheForest]

8:51 that’s all the Weed smoke everyone was exhaling. Everyone working on this movie was high

[@bekleedee]

They didnt have Tigger because the licensing on his character wasnt free yet. Piglet and pooh's were both on the public domain thing. Tigger was released a bit later than them.

[@6sKi6z6]

Legally, they couldn’t put Pooh in his red shirt because the copyright law. Same reason why they couldn’t use Tigger. Not public domain yet.

[@pixelfuzztv]

I would imagine if the masks had fur the constant dripping honey would be pretty hard to clean and reset between takes/days, and pretty much ruin the mask entirely. even if they used a substitute. it probably wouldn't be as shiny and noticeable in dark close ups either.

[@mgw5377]

He had a budget of 100k and this is what he came up with? District 9 had the same budget and that movie is a masterpiece

[@DeauntesSpot]

I was wondering the same thing,how were the animals surviving before Christopher ran into them🤣🧐

[@finalfroggitapproaches6418]

Actually, that aspect isn’t that far off from real life. Wild animals survive just fine, and humans start feeding them and that animal stops hunting because it can just go to the human for food. Why go through all the trouble of chasing prey when you can just eat some slightly-expired raw bacon someone left out for you? They get comfortable. They let themselves go, because humans have them covered. Until the humans don’t and these out of practice animals either don’t remember how to hunt or physically can’t, and starve to death. So Pooh could’ve been getting his own honey, then gotten so used to being handed food by Christopher Robin that he forgot how to gather honey. Once CR left, Pooh didn’t have the food from Christopher Robin nor the ability to find his own food, and so he starved.

[@Kloyster2010]

@@finalfroggitapproaches6418 Still doesn't make sense since Pooh HAS honey and looks fat...

[@Renoistic]

It's because they're just toys representing the magic and innocence of childhood...

[@wadubber3202]

Some of the things you mentioned have to do with the stipulations of public domain. Tigger is not public domain yet, so they cannot use him for a few more years. Pooh is public domain, but the Disney depiction (ie the red shirt) is wholly Disney's and not public domain, hence why Pooh is dressed differently

[@russmanYT]

they should've gone with the idea that none of these were real animals/beings. all in christopher's head, but christopher went nutty so all the characters in his head also got monstrous and horrible. Then at the end the big twist reveal is it was christopher robin killing people the entire time, pooh and piglet were never there.

[@DeadPressed4444]

Elvis made me think that Piglet should've been this movie's tiny murderer hoggoblin

[@ashuraconla2550]

In the comments of another review for this movie, someone gave the idea if the victims had personality traits Pooh's friends, like A scary cat, someone depressed, someone mature, etc. A parallel of sorts. Pooh would try to make the group turn on each other and kill/eat the depressed friend just like Pooh was forced too, like make it a ever repeating cycle or something. Or maybe the animals would see these friends as rivals, people who stole Christopher away from them, and the animals need to kill the friends in order to make Christopher return and love them again; some sick twisted love that is monopolizing and co-dependent. Also, Christopher should have been the main character and this movie would have been create as a psychological horror. Maybe it could be been like this one story i read where Christopher's parents have him be looked up because they thought he was insane, and then when he's older have Pooh and friends be killers, making us wonder if Christopher was doing it and imagining them doing it or not. This is of course assuming the people behind this project actually wanted to try. Instead of just rushing to capitalize on Pooh being public domain.

[@AndyMade]

I am going to set some things clear: Rhys Frake Waterfield wasn't allwoed to make Pooh wear a red shirt, because Disney still owns the copyright rights to Winnie Pooh, how they draw him. So you can use Winnie Pooh as you want, but it is not allowed to look like Disneys version And also, Tigger wasn't in the original book that got into public domain, he is in public domain after January 1st 2024, which is around the time that the directors are going to include him in Winnie Pooh Blood and Honey 2 The reason that the animals survived before Christopher Robin came by, is that they are in fact animals that are more human than normal animals. They just had natural hunting instincts, that slowly dissappeared because Christopher Robin brought them their food, and probably didn't leave them any food. For anyone wondering, Christopher Robin didnt want any secrets between him and her, and when he saw how the place looked like, he had to check what was going on, because at that moment he still considered them as "friends". I also dont know why Pooh ripped Tinas shirt off, maybe because, when she would be put in the wood chipper, there would be rests of the material of the shirt between the meat. Or the actress just wanted to show her body. I mean, Maria could have thought that Pooh was her stalker, because the costume obviously looks like a mask, so she thought maybe her stalker wore a mask. Pooh didnt whip him with a lock of hair. It's probably Eeyores tail.

[@puddels2672]

You can literally find Pooh’s mask on a prop shop. THEY DIDNT EVEN CUSTOMIZE THE MASK😂. I deadass searched “ honey bear silicone mask” and it popped right up.

[@althealee9375]

Film Theory has a great video on this and says that Tigger isn’t in this movie because his character hasn’t entered the public domain yet while Pooh and others have

[@silentfury2005]

Actually, this movie was made because the original story was in public domain. But only Pooh, Piglet, Eeyore were made public and Tiger isn’t public domain yet because he’s one of the later ones.

[@catandogclone7880]

So the copyright for Tigger doesn’t expire until next year, as he was introduced in 1928, 2 years after the majority of the characters were created, which is why he wasn’t included in the movie in anyway, however, Kanga and Roo are in the public domain so more than likely they’re saved for a potential sequel if it’s ever made.

[@thehorrorhound6575]

He couldn’t do the Pooh voice because Jim Cummins (the voice of Pooh) said he would sue if they even sounded remotely like him lol

[@oncerand_directioner]

I was wondering what any of the original Pooh VAs thought of this abomination of a horror movie. I'm guessing if they introduce Tigger in the sequel, he'll have to be silent too since Jim Cummins also voices him

[@SuperMickyChow]

The reason they couldnt use the red shirt or tiny piglet appearance is because the copyright for those visuals /stylings belongs to Disney. For this movie the appearances to be noticeably different

[@herbiehopkins]

I'd totally forgotten that I watched this film, I guess that shows just how memorable it is! 😂

[@Mariusioannesp]

This film exists solely because the first of A.A. Milne's original Winnie the Pooh stories entered the public domain. The reason Pooh doesn't have a little red shirt is because that is specific to Disney's version of Pooh and therefore not part of the public domain. That is also the reason why Pooh's voice isn't similar to the cartoon version. The reason Tigger isn't mentioned is because he appear in A.A. Milne's later stories and are still under copyright. Those will enter the public domain next year, just in time for the sequel of this movie.

[@romatic]

They left out tigger because he isn’t in the public domain yet. He came around a couple years later

[@nova_beam]

The original Winnie the Pooh have fallen into public domain, but the Disney version of those characters have not. Pooh can’t wear a red t-shirt because that was a Disney creation. A lot what people associate with the Winnie the Pooh characters were traits given to them by the mouse house.

[@Lutherstrode17492]

3:12 They legally can’t. Pooh, Chris, and Piglet are public domain, but the rest aren’t

[@dnighthawk204241]

This movie being made for $100,000 was the biggest reveal of all. That's barely enough to pay the crew for a short no-mistakes-allowed shoot. No wonder Pooh had to wear rubber kitchen gloves, the mask was probably 5% of their budget by itself

[@clamantstone]

The beginning could of been done better if it was explained the due to chirstopher meeting them and bringing them food for years that they eventually stop hunting for food becoming complacent and soly relied on chris and thus weren't prepared for this absunce when winter arrived, it would also expained the line about returning to their animal roots no longer wanting to rally of humans like chris as for doing so forced them to kill their friend to survive.

[@Yezpahr]

1:18 "They all put their phones on a side table"... The most unrealistic part of the movie.

[@bloodrunsclear]

This is like the Banana Splits horror movie. More people will remember the show and the good vibes while the new ‘edgy’ version gets forgotten.

[@bloodrunsclear]

@chandllerburse737 It’s even sillier than that: it only exists because the Winnie The Pooh copyright finally expired. Anyone can make a Winnie the Pooh anything right now!

[@cartooncritique6625]

Didn't A.A. Milne ultimately end up hating Winnie the Pooh (as did his son, the real Christopher Robin)? Also pretty sure they couldn't include Tigger and the others because they're not in the public domain yet. 18:00 What's the point of giving the characters in your movie guns if they're too stupid to use them right? 22:31 That would likely get the mouse coming after them though, so probably best to avoid even slight allusions to the Disney character.

[@odd3s48]

When Pooh is whipping Christopher I’m pretty sure he’s doing it with eeyores tail.

[@sophiastargazer]

I was laughing so hard while watching this movie. 10/10 experience. It's actually advertised as a comedy on KZbin movies, which I personally think is 100% accurate.

[@kolonarulez5222]

The best thing about Pooh being public domain is someone else can come along to make this plot work. This is frustratingly basic for what could be pretty scary even if they can't use Tigger

[@raelogan]

They should have made this like a "Dale and Tucker VS Evil" thing where they just keep accidentally murdering intruders if the Woods due to a misunderstanding, and it all culminates in Christopher Robin in saying "Oh, Pooh, you silly old bear!" and they all just have a laugh as if this was normal.

[@Arc115YT]

tbh... i'm here for the sequel. I hope they have more money to work with and we gotta see more characters.

[@blo0dysmiles297]

Who in their right mind actually thought this movie was gonna be anything more then a B horror film?

[@huntforbigfloptober1333]

It would have made more sense if Eeyore offed himself after being abandoned by Christopher Robin. And uh I guess that also contributes to Pooh and Piglet going on a rampage?

[@buffalo5knives809]

Please review a delightful Christmas "horror" movie called Santa Jaws. It's kind of a Home Alone without the burglar stuff and the France vacation is replaced with a shark that kills your whole family. I caught it one year on Syfy around the holidays and was enthralled. Here's the synopsis to whet your appetite: "Trying to survive the family Christmas, Cody makes a wish to be alone, which ends up backfiring when a shark manifests and kills his entire family."

[@jeremiah-9209]

RIP people ruin everything, it was one of the things that got me into your channel

[@slimothyjames4577]

My husband and I regularly forget to lock the house up when we leave, but we live in a small neighborhood (village, rather; ~300 pop.) where it's completely safe to do so. I can't imagine leaving it unlocked if I lived anywhere else lol... this area is peaceful enough where I can walk the backwoods roads at night, alone, and not be concerned.

[@slimothyjames4577]

@chandllerburse737 I try to err on the side of caution, though I live in an area where you can get a lift from a total stranger with little worry. I typically don't go out alone at night and I always keep my phone on me just in case, but having grown up in downtown St. Louis MO I've come to notice this kind of safety out here is pretty unique! I still stay cautious and vigilant though :) Thanks for the concern, and I totally get why you'd be scared of that! My husband wants to get a crossbow for home defense because the world just keeps getting scarier and it's only a matter of time 'til this little paradise becomes another cesspit, especially since the surrounding cities are full of shady people and druggies

[@slimothyjames4577]

@chandllerburse737 Unfortunately, at this time, neither my husband nor I are legally able to own guns :/ a psychiatrist forcibly (by threat of warrant) institutionalized him because he discussed depression/anger/suicidal thoughts even though he was absolutely no risk to himself or anyone else, just got a shitty psych and even shittier institution. I was diagnosed with bipolar as a toddler by a child psychiatrist who never looked into home life so even though I'm completely stable I'm unlikely to be given a gun license. I'd much rather we were able to have a shotgun but a tactical crossbow would be our best bet since don't want to dabble in illegal stuff :'( American healthcare seems to just screw people over left and right. In any case, I keep a pocket knife in my purse and I'm probably going to get mace at some point since it's good for animal and human attackers, where a knife might not always work in my favor.

[@Grim_Sister]

Pooh can’t wear his iconic red shirt because of copyright infringement. That is the most iconic Pooh, but it is also the version that is still owned by Disney My guess is that with Tigger, they wanted a real tiger and couldn’t afford it while keeping the cast safe and protecting animal rights. Also, CGI and after effects are expensive. As an animator in training, I can also tell you that the “animated” beginning is more of a animatic. You can find millions of those on KZbin to whatever musical song (and critical role scene) you can think of. It’s pretty simple once you’ve learned after effects and know how to draw

[@AFKhaos1337]

Missed opportunity to not have his only two words be , "Oh, bother."

[@knguyennguyen5559]

The reasons some characters are left out is because they haven't become public domain yet

[@ChunkyMexican]

Thought you forget about this tbh.

[@BigFella32]

3:27 it was because Whinnie the Pooh, Piglet, and Eeyore were the only ones in public domain

[@bg8561]

The reason why the outfits of the animal characters aren't the same as the animated characters is because the copyright license of the aspects of the more modern designs still haven't expired and gone to the public domain, so they can't use them yet.

[@dil_krd]

That many things are missing in the movie, is because of copyrights, everyone isn’t still allowed to use those things, as an example Poohs red shirt

[@xoticbell]

Nothing better than watching some Elvis while doing homework. I’m failing btw.