World War 3 (Hour by Hour)

[@TheInfographicsShow]

Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days! Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile 💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/TheInfographicsShowWW3

[@princeerrlcabrera1714]

Nice I'm gonna download it the game looks cool

[@bobjoebo8933]

Lol I have been playing for years

[@TrilogyNjStorm]

This is amazing breakdown 😂 truly is

[@orionlucio6817]

Me like

[@princeerrlcabrera1714]

@@bobjoebo8933 Lol what?!! 😲

[@gaminglife9205]

I love how he ends by talking about nuclear warfare and nukes ending the world, and then starts thanking the sponsor

[@marshall2q648]

im thanking that he is thanking the sponsor at the end of the video

[@aphoriste5067]

"End with the world in ashes"-- THANKS AGAIN TO OUR SPONSORS

[@ptlewis2000]

That was startling and sobering. "The world will end and we all die. So hey guys don't forget to to use your promo code, and choose YOUR country to simulate the end of civilization! See ya next time as we explore the history of Sierra Leone!"

[@Kaniela-xq8vl]

“note’s”??? What does the apostrophe do?

[@gaminglife9205]

@@Kaniela-xq8vl wrong comment

[@OneCut1Slash]

"... That will end with the world in ashes..." Roughly 140 years later the Vault Dweller emerges.

[@9_1.1]

This comment alone made me redownload fallout shelter

[@LEX_O0880]

@@9_1.1 nice

[@charliechurch5004]

Lol

[@Xtank425]

Vault dwellers, you mean, if you're thinking about more than one fallout game

[@someoneout-there2165]

Fallout 2 was absolutely one of the best games I've ever played. You can literally almost do anything you want.

[@luluonly486]

This video: Russia takes Europe in a day. Russia: can’t take Ukraine in 6 months… *this video aged well* 😂

[@michaelafrank56]

Lol facts

[@danielramirez1529]

Yeah literally I think this creator and similar will need to reevaluate their estimations on the military capabilities and strength of Russia’s forces.

[@ozPanzer]

@@danielramirez1529 should release a new one where Moscow falls within a week.

[@thegoingmeiry]

Actually Russia could take Ukraine easily if they want to. They are only sending their old weapons to Ukraine so that they can use their better weapons against Nato incase they started to attack Russia. And remember they also have hypersonic missile technology that NATO doesn't have so they only need very few hypersonic missiles to attack useful parts of Ukraine and end everything. Remember one hypersonic missile can destroy the capital of Ukraine in less than 30 minute. Now I'm not picking sides I'm just saying what could happen so don't come at me with your snowflake attitude.

[@ozPanzer]

@@thegoingmeiry hahahahaha no. They have so few hypersonic missiles it wouldn't make a difference otherwise they would have used them. Russia has been proven to be a paper tiger and the world is now laughing at Russia. They have sent T-90 and latest helicopters and strike aircraft and all have been found out. They won't send SU-57 and T-14 because they have so few and will be found to be like everything else Russia has sent to the meat grinder. Not good enough.

[@Adam23165]

...he really needs to re-do this one. In the last 7 months since this video was released, the world learned that Russia would be a big no show for WW3.

[@noonefromnowhere9940]

What?

[@Blackeyemofo]

True, their cardboard helmets and inability to refuel their vehicles efficiently has shown to be disastrous. Drone warfare and the javelin supplied by the United States also has been crippling them hard. I don’t think Russia is really trying all that hard although even on a small scale people were expecting Ukraine to be squashed. We since then have been able to reverse engineer some of their tech.

[@imreloadin]

@@Blackeyemofo Bro you really think they're not trying hard??? I'm sorry but you don't get to say they haven't been trying hard when they've had to vastly widen their conscription efforts and have been having to resort to using bullets from 40 years ago. They are trying REALLY hard but they are just vastly ineffective in both war materials and personnel. They've shown the entire world that their military is mostly bluff at this point due to extensive corruption and ineptitude.

[@Blackeyemofo]

@@imreloadin they havnt even used a 1/5th of their known active personnel. A little under 1/15th of their active plus reserve… if Russia were to be trying they would be sending hoards of dudes with no weapon to charge a machine gun nest like they did in ww2

[@matsv201]

Its simple. Russia don´t attack, and it don´t happen. The only possible war now is a nuclear war.

[@writingref]

The likelihood of China attacking Taiwan at the same time an already devastated Russia decides to go after the rest of NATO is increasingly unlikely- but I will consider this a “what if Ukraine had fallen quickly”

[@jakeg3126]

I also don't think it's remotely any of the other stuff could take place or already happen in a few hours not everyone is 100% ready all the time and is attacking with planes in the air, marching through countries and have have time for it to be considering hesitating to attack only a few hours after something happens

[@berlyngrey9242]

@@jakeg3126 I couldn't follow any of what you were saying

[@jakeg3126]

@@berlyngrey9242 I should've added comma or something. He mentioned them both attacking and counterattacking at same time. I wordy by saying by hour 1, somehow the attacked countries impossibly got mobilized and was ready to defend itself. I don't think a lot of people would even know something happened for a few hours. Everyone was too ready

[@azersrecordings.3600]

@Good nest he’s basically saying some of these events would probably happen farther over time.

[@JasonCummer]

Maybe they are waiting for Russia to fall further so they can annex some of the disputed land on their boarder

[@virginiatrains7886]

Anyone else feel like everytime this guy uploads something involving either Russia, Ukraine or WWIII if it happened, it ends up happening?

[@Slenderlink99]

yeah i was just thinking ab that

[@Normal_is_boring25]

Now that you mention it yes.

[@Normal_is_boring25]

@Deceased Canadian Goose really? Wow that’s impressive

[@galaxyminer694]

@Deceased Canadian Goose what does this comment mean for this

[@NortheastSurvival911]

As I was sitting here watching that I was thinking pretty much what you just said and then I glanced down and there it was. But yes you are correct. So if he could like maybe make a video about World war 3 not happening and me hitting the lottery you know that'd be great.

[@iunnor]

Infographics: “US aircraft carriers are almost impossible to sink!” Also infographic: “Yeah the Chinese will sink about 4 or 5 of them”

[@SalvorCraft]

frrr

[@robertcowan7610]

The United States' aircraft carriers would not be sunk. Period.

[@backupdoughboi6822]

I mean constant bombardment would reshape the earth, highly doubt a ship would be just fine

[@SalvorCraft]

@@backupdoughboi6822 you have a point but it wouldnt sink

[@backupdoughboi6822]

@@SalvorCraft only a matter of time until we see who is right

[@tinynekoking6488]

I whole heartedly think they should make an updated version of this video every year. So much changed it would be so interesting to hear any differences or similarities between the years.

[@JoshMessiCR7]

The American government is under control of nuclear warmongering imperialists lee by biden prestige but russia is under an dictator who abuses his position and commits war crimes.

[@Spectator12]

Ok no one gonna talk about indie

[@Military-Games]

LOL😂

[@henrytang2203]

This hypothetical situation could only arise at the peak of the USSR's power. The majority of Russian youth today want to emigrate and the vast majority of Russian conscripts don't want to be there. I doubt Russia could effectively take on NATO without nukes. As for China and Taiwan, I think it'll more likely persist as a North/South Korea arrangement; lots of threats but war is too costly.

[@bradleyisclutch]

that’s the problem. They wouldn’t have a chance without nuclear weapons. Which is why a war with NATO Vs Russia would result in nuclear disaster :(

[@xxxcool2565]

Why would Russia have any qualms to use Nukes? What do they have to lose? West pushed them against the wall.

[@isaowater]

@@bradleyisclutch Exactly, it's horrifying what will happen to europe and the world when such a thing happens.

[@JordanBlue1]

You sounds hopeful, and scared.

[@ericherrmann3799]

I think your right USSR today could never beat NATO, like you said though they have the nukes, and if there losing the war really what do you think they're going to do 13000 nukes worldwide and no one going to use them in WW3 I bet the nukes will start flying in less than a week. Guess will see ?

[@dorkking100]

It's crazy to me to think people actually believe russia could take the entire baltics in a day. If every city just surrendered, it'd still take a week. Same with taiwan. First day they might not even invade taiwan themselves. Unless the island just surrendered, it could take years to fully conquer.

[@foolroblox3231]

Yet again, the Taliban took over in like 1 month after that offensive

[@Dodsodalo]

@@foolroblox3231 America left the defense of Afghanistan to the official Army and government. Who just.... Left. I think there is a difference there.

[@kennethJAO96]

it will vary on the day they'll deploy their militaries power. take note that china is one of the great powers with lots of military equipment and personnel's. I just hope that if this happen that great countries have a way to neutralize them without using nukes.

[@robertives973]

I think if it came down to it, the west would be foolish to underestimate China. Russia obviously isn’t what it used to be but China has tons of tech and tons of money. Of course, it would be hard for the US to conquer the baltics within a day too so I think you’re pretty right there.

[@danielc9967]

Lol, China and Russia are just paper tigers, their armies would all cave unless they resort to Nukes, hasn’t the Ukraine conflict thought everyone that? If Russia hasn’t been able to conquer Ukraine, there’s no way they’ll last even a month against Nato.

[@Andy-WanKenobi]

I have several problems with this the biggest being we knew the build up of Russian forces far before the war started and the way this is shown is basically a surprise attack which I find extremely doubtful considering we would be able to see the buildup of Chinese boats before they get the chance to set sail

[@williamwchuang]

We would mine the seas between China and Taiwan.

[@FrankBUILTperformance]

Exactly. These kinds of invasions don’t take weeks to prep. You would see the major uptick in activity / build up.

[@thehorsecockexpress1068]

Yeah the US have known all of Russia's movements and numbers months before the Ukraine conflict. NATO and the US would clap China

[@nickt600]

@@williamwchuang Taiwan isn't part of NATO so i doubt they would get any help defending against China

[@DexWeapons]

@@nickt600 Taiwan japan and South Korea are in an alliance called SEATO which is a pacific defense alliance with the USA in it as well

[@christopherreynolds5783]

Such a sad story. We all just want to take care of our kids.

[@childskites6346]

Same but its not fair when leadership makes the rules

[@sirleme6522]

YEAH TAKE CARE OF OUR KIDS WHILE WE ARE BEING UNJUST TO OTHER PEOPLE AND MAKING OTHER PEOPLE SUFFER BECAUSE OF US INCLUDING OUR KIDS

[@holdenparker179]

@@childskites6346 who then would make the rules? losers?

[@mrdatnigg]

@Holden Parker So if you aren't a leader you're automatically a loser? Care to explain why?

[@holdenparker179]

@@mrdatnigg Any person in a society loses to a leader of its society. The Leader is one and only. Means he or she or it is above the society and any other from this society. Which means that they lose to the leader. Which means they are losers. Of course, they can try to make up the majority, change the game, even change the society. Bit then again, the system is built up and creates a new leader with more power. Again, the leader rules and everyone is a loser against him/her/it.

[@marshaltito7232]

Probably not the most realistic, but this was a fun all out scenario that really took me through it!

[@Kopie0830]

Yep, possible nuclear warfare is fun...

[@Ghost0fPakistan]

Probably? Almost all of it is a frikin joke. He's just doing this for bias entertainment.

[@JP-hj2gs]

@@Ghost0fPakistan Then please tell us what you would forecast for WWIII

[@ThorSuzuki1]

@@Ghost0fPakistan Think he is clearly quite unbiased. It's no secret Russia stands NO chance against Nato, Putin himself said it. China is a difficult one as China has never fought a modern war. And not at this scale with their unproven tech.

[@emanueldelacruz1101]

@@ThorSuzuki1 China Russia alliance would destroy NATO. Both China and Russia have allies that this guy conviniently Left out. North Corea alone. Whole make a whole to the NATO. No to mention Iran

[@TheHockeyKeeper]

The extent of changes in the world, and new realizations since the release of this video, is staggering.

[@danielsmithiv1279]

There was no point in all this demonstration of new technology when nukes were going to end up getting used. It's all pointless. Might as well kick off the football game with an actual football.

[@xhippy4682]

Yeah like Finland ans Sweden now members of NATO.

[@ctg4818]

Plain to see real life is just Hearts of Iron 5

[@jmupp2876]

@@xhippy4682 yes and also the ineffectiveness of Russia

[@jamama3218]

@@danielsmithiv1279 You are extremely naive if you believe that kid..

[@jaredcolon4535]

This was an absolute and totally captivating story line. And I honestly think it would be a worth while series to produce monthly. To play this actually out and use declassified info and get input from military strategist act and retired. I will say though that was a very optimistic outcome china taking out that many carriers so quickly. Maybe maybe that many over two months or three but not in the open especially not against the next generation carriers

[@parkourcentral7194]

Yes yes yes

[@zsarimaxim692]

Would be more entertaining if the guy has better knowledge of how military equipment actually works.

[@raylopez99]

Nope, this Infographics Show video is bogus. I did not watch the video, but it's probably inaccurate if it deals with nuclear war. Extensive war gaming has found that in a ICBM nuclear exchange (i.e., not a tactical nuke situation) the most likely areas to be hit are NOT the USA or Russia or China, but rather...the Pacific Ocean or some other uninhabited area. This is because for the first round, "saber rattling" is common rather than actual strikes. The USA actually though about doing the same thing in WWII, but because it only had two bombs, it did not risk a "demonstration" strike. However, today, with thousands of nuclear missiles on each side, it's feasible to do such demonstration strikes. Upvote me if you found this informative and if the Infographic Show failed to mention this (I'm not going to watch this long episode).

[@manoloorz]

@@zsarimaxim692 he doesn't write the episodes, he's just the narrator, infographics is a big team of people, not just him

[@damien991]

@@raylopez99 They briefly mention it in the last 30 seconds, with no real detail. At least watch the a video before you criticise it. I don't care if you don't want to watch a long video (Listen to it in the background if you must). They went to the effort of making it so at least go to the effort of watching their video. It take can easily take 100+ man hours to make a video this long all it cost you is 30 minutes. Worst of all you didn't even bother jumping to the end of video to see if they mention nuclear wars it would have taken what 1-2 minutes max. You probably spent at least 10 writing that ill informed comment.

[@kylethecatholic]

The one thing I think that’s wrong with this scenario, Belarus is not included as a belligerent, or at the very least, is not included as a Russian jumping off point for their invasion of Poland.

[@maxpowsey3763]

@@afterawordfromoursponsor @1:53

[@Rob337_aka_CancelProof]

The poles aren't idiots they've been thinking about this scenario for decades. They're the least likely to be caught by surprise by any hypothetical situation in this video

[@tryep5567]

I'm okay with most of this as it's all just speculation. However, expecting the people of Russia or China to rise up and do more than small protests against their governments over military aggression means you vastly overestimate the willingness of people to risk their lives

[@gunslinger9171]

Yeah Hong Kong would totally revolt and a civil war would occur so China would have to deal with that too.

[@johnpaul3099]

Furthermore war with NATO would focus support from the people nobody wants to see their country destroyed regardless of the regime

[@bhatkat]

Yeah, any dissenters will know enough to keep low, they will know the consequences of challenging the popular lies. Even in an open society like the USA they had very little effect during the oil wars. And the "right to life" people will be screaming for blood of course.

[@amhuman5138]

@@gunslinger9171 I would personally revive the 'mandate of the emperor' concept and make the position democratic, then rule China by sheer power of not understanding their politics!

[@jasonlib1996]

You underestimate the level of resistance of general populations once they're seeing large volumes of their country men killed. The Ukraine war has show massive public outcries and protests against the Russian government. as well as troops who were misinformed of their tasks, and object significantly to the point of critically low morale and desertion. This has been the reality in Ukraine, whilst they are against an almost infinitely motivated opponent fighting strongly for their freedoms from occupation, including civilians who have been fighting, or erecting obstacles and traps.

[@dcap1]

End of the video: "...in an escalatory ladder that will end with the world in ashes. Thanks again to our sponsor, conflict of nations."

[@Powderlover1]

Conflicts of nations is usually the backbone of their videos.

[@beenaplumber8379]

Yeah, it's nice they got around to acknowledging nukes in a video about WWIII. I mean, it's cool to see all this stuff about how it could play out today. All the best nuclear holocaust movies include a scenario for the start of the war, and it's nice to see that updated. But really, nukes are kinda the assumption for WWIII, and I was really looking for a description of how that might play out. Instead we get a fascinating premise for a video game.

[@Powderlover1]

@@beenaplumber8379 I don’t think either side would actually launch the apocalyptic exchange that movies describe. I’d bet limited exchange with deaths in the millions, maybe tens of millions (including from radiation, climate disruption, food shortages, etc.). I think that would be enough to get both sides to back away from the table.

[@luckyus4377]

have a look at Patrick Lancaster or Graham Phillips channels, they report from the front lines, so we can see some truth.

[@warrenreid6109]

Yea, I got that too.

[@Justin-bv3gi]

Feel like he’s giving away everyone’s secret defense tactics with this.

[@matthewnewton8812]

If they were secrets, he wouldn’t have known them….duh…

[@philipwade2103]

There’s no way he’s giving up Classified material. He’s giving up general information that is already known by all sides. There’s so much we don’t know that’s kept Top Secret.

[@your_-_mom]

@@philipwade2103 it was a joke…

[@mohamednorizam5027]

Relax dude… Dis is juz another GI Joe cartoon.. 😂

[@zofferz0]

Most of the tactics in the video are for training/what they might do by the book. In reality its not gonna go anywhere near the video different tactics for different times adding in the amount of resources they have at the moment

[@pahtar7189]

China making a declaration of war would be an admission that Taiwan is an independent nation, so there's no way they'd do this.

[@nathanbrammer8471]

I think you are being very generous to the Russians especially and also the Chinese. Also this would probably go nuclear a lot quicker.

[@kamilwolny]

There is no reason to youse nuclear weapon, Z Chinese want Taiwan in one peace

[@ianburns1175]

I don't think it would go nuclear quickly....mutual destruction is suicide....as long as they have hope no one will use nukes....now once a side loses hope that's when nukes will be used. Before you beat them they will want to inflict as much pain as possible

[@justplanes295]

@@kamilwolny Russia doesn’t seem to be so thorough though

[@agarrikr2996]

@@justplanes295 none of them can, no country will want war, this isn’t Lego or UFC. even if a country will beat another, it’ll sustain heavy damages. Let’s say Russia and US decide to go nuclear, and Us wins, cool it wins. But now it wouldn’t be a world wide power, and it will be like Pakistan or some third world country. Win but at what cost ? Leaders are smart, not children. It’s only us talking about wars

[@qweqwe-qe9ty]

Not really, given that 7 months into Ukraine invasion nukes are still not used. He said nukes within a week, which is extremely early

[@matthewjacob5174]

I'm both fascinated and scared bc this is interesting but scared bc it might become a reality

[@Dylan-uz4nq]

If you live in America you don’t need to be scared we good lol

[@biblicalmotivation_7]

@@Dylan-uz4nq Canada gang 🥱

[@lordtark6736]

If this channel is talking about it. You bet it's going to freaking happen 😭

[@Tanker000]

Blame on Joe Biden for not doing his job right

[@11th_defender51]

@@biblicalmotivation_7 bro we are part of NATO. Which means Canada has to help.

[@Meloncholymadness]

6:00 Imagine being a tank driver and assigned to one of Russia's cold era tanks... It'd be like knowing you're literally canon fodder..

[@Theorginalherobrine772]

Command wouldn't tell them they are...just like the conscripts and the equipment they sent to Ukraine in the first weeks was literally canon fodder but Russian government told the the conscripts it was just "a special operation and that Ukraine would welcome them"

[@Meloncholymadness]

@@Theorginalherobrine772 That's a Western propaganda narrative.

[@adrinathegreat3095]

True, you could also say the same thing with nato infantry, Low iq cannon fodder. The ones waging the war wouldn't be the ones fighting

[@meloney]

@@Meloncholymadness The fact that they were canon fodder is not though. Thats just reality with conscripts going into a war the first days.

[@chriszachary8104]

I wouldnt wanna be a driver of russian anything in ukraine right now st.javalin is watching 🤣🇺🇦🇺🇦

[@myservicesride6086]

After this video was released, the Philippines agreed and allowed 4 new "bases US can use". This is a game changer, to the detriment of China.

[@ReeseW313]

That part ‼️ 🤓

[@Powderlover1]

i love how this is basically a battle between Russia and not the US, but the US’s ability to get to the battlefield.

[@FrankBUILTperformance]

Yeah I doubt the us would be caught so off guard. We’re always looking for a war, we would be much more ready. At least on one front lol

[@Powderlover1]

@@FrankBUILTperformance I paid $85 for a 3 minute doctors visit and antibiotic yesterday. That better be for a reason.

[@Powderlover1]

@LibtardsStillCant SilenceMe20 actually I give in, you recognize in the UK, if you have a heart attack you don’t have to wait, right? General wait times for doctor visits are equal to the US, as is emergency response/intake. And for specialist visits it’s determined on an as needed basis, if you have an emergency you get in, same as the US. What does have higher wait times are elective and nonemergency surgeries, think colonoscopy, which have about double our wait times. However you fail to realize a nationalized system would cut OUR direct health expense by about 40%, that’s about a new car for me. That’s how much more efficient a system like the NHS is. As for death panels, no, just fake news, and as for forced abortions, no you do not, unless you know someone in China, but that’s not exactly on their healthcare system. Goodbye bot.

[@Powderlover1]

Oh that 40% is if you have an average HMO plan, if you’re uninsured it could be 100’s of thousands.

[@Powderlover1]

@@JeikuAnimeReview of value, absolutely. $100 an aspirin at the hospital, or 3k for a 5 min ride in a glorified bus, not at all. Our system is built for the rich, and why our infant mortality rate is ranked so much lower than European countries’.

[@kennethn3179]

I think this channel gives Russia a lot more credit than it's actually capable of.

[@johnpaul3099]

What European country has the ability to take over the Ukraine?

[@danielc9967]

@@johnpaul3099 Germany, France the UK even Poland could all take Ukraine easily

[@danielc9967]

@@johnpaul3099 even Russia could have taken Ukraine if they weren’t so disorganized and incompetent

[@johnpaul3099]

@@danielc9967 Only France and Turkey have that ability . Germany bwahaha

[@matthewb5364]

Best to overestimate and then "never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake."

[@mcain2911]

The critique I have is that I highly doubt it would take that long to get the American military into the places it was needed. We knew what Russia intended to do months before they did it. I would imagine there would be an obvious and not so obvious buildup of forces in anticipation of the scenarios shown.

[@spvillano]

We have two primary deployment modes. Airborne mode, with somewhat limited assets deployable and while granted, it's an impressive capability, a full army it is not. Then, there's marine transportation mode, which can take weeks to get shiploads of angry men and angrier equipment.

[@k.lisaswensen9877]

Agreed.

[@rustyreese4006]

@@spvillano it depends on the theater of the conflict. The US has forward deployed equipment in several places that's all maintained and wouldn't take weeks to deploy. Also several nations use equipment the US has sold them so they could use them while waiting. Plus a bunch of other logistics stuff that we probably don't have a clue about. Then there's the weapons that have been developed tested and never needed that people never think about. One of those things is a reason I don't think China would be very effective at the extreme long range missile strikes against the navy. About the only accurate thing in this video is most likely the very end.

[@bigj9761]

Russia wouldn't last a week and ill give china two weeks

[@emanueldelacruz1101]

Russia and China have allies. The East is just too strong

[@xavie-san-3334]

Well... This video aged like milk.

[@FranklinGreen-w7t]

?

[@soupbae3542]

Already imagining WW3. No electricity, no internet, scarcity of food, loud missile noises every minute, living in the dark.

[@Indrid__Cold]

It won't really be "living" just marking time. I'd rather be vaporized.

[@cherokeevolfusa2891]

If you live in the americas you will be untouched until nukes fly. Then if you don't live in major cities you still won't be touched.

[@arvintyree1109]

Basically the dark ages but with fallout

[@HylianJayAppears]

So...what Ukraine is going through right now?

[@idontmakecontent4870]

@@HylianJayAppears yeah but worse

[@felixnyamongo]

We need a remake of this video. In light of recent events.

[@Bearstat]

Russia is winning here lol

[@gentleminion2849]

​@Bearstat in a realistic scenario russia will fall within 5 months

[@user_mcl_28]

No matter what happens, this man takes the side of the West and pushes the video towards the victory of the West because he is an American himself

[@desertzillions4171]

Hind sight being 20/20, it is doubtful Russia could have performed as stated in this. Chance are Russia would get beat quickly due to the extreme challenges in supply chain. From what I understand, China's ability to move troops is very limited and the Navy is still very incapable. It is also very unlikely that he U.S Navy would just walk into China's missile range without attempting to take out capabilities with stealth and other first strike weapons.

[@ScpDrRisha]

Yes...though,I always feared this would happen! I'm even more frightened in the fact Russia could (might not) attack the UK where I'm from as I've got my whole future ahead and it's scary being in a country that is helping Ukraine to attack Russia! Even scarier to be in a country AT war! The more Russia fights the more country's that get involved and it gets more dangerous...there is a matter of time when Britain goes to war....I think this war would go on for quite a couple of years as it did for ww2 might not though as greater technology is being made So yeah

[@_R-R]

While the PLAN is not on the same footing as the USN in capability, that gap is steadily closing. Yet in terms of sheer numbers, the PLAN is the global leader.

[@kevinbarry4325]

Finally,a knowledgeable person…we are simply the best. War is our business,we have been at war for 100 yrs somewhere..we are the supreme warlords of this planet.

[@stephenluo8620]

And Russia has more nukes than USA. Means better not defeat Russia, or everyone dies together. You got it?

[@xdcamikazie1217]

@@ScpDrRisha ukraine isn’t attacking russia mate

[@samscharp3367]

This video hasn't aged well. Russia was given wayyyyyy too much credit for competence. I don't see the Chinese impacting the US navy this bad either.

[@marketslice5030]

a little strange infographics shows us real-world scenarios BEFORE they happen, and then these events end up happening

[@SteezusKhrist]

tbh this channel teaches me how to observe what goes on in life and predict the outcomes that could happen

[@evanoconnell9448]

Aaaaaand dont actuwlly happen anything like how infographics say it would. Which is not surprising given the propagamda style lies like in this video. Hour 2.....crippling sanctions againat russia for taking crimea.....nope. thats a flat out lie!

[@kmg9359]

@@codyspencer7047 why ):

[@Andrew-wh4qm]

Tbh I'm hoping it doesn't happen just to see the pessimists getting dunked on

[@c.eastonnn]

Oh nah dont say that 💀

[@LA-nl7ip]

I feel like you’re giving far more credit to red missiles and missile defence systems then they deserve

[@hamsterfromabove8905]

China is much more competent at warfare than Russia is. It's better to be prepared for a very dangerous fight.

[@topspot4834]

Probably cause this was 6 months ago ... Russia's incompetence and China's inexperience will certainly have an impact.

[@nibbax7772]

@@topspot4834 yup they’ll definitely use nukes and then nato and us will use nukes and then we’ll all die

[@victorbudz8157]

Lol, i guess thats his opinion

[@rickmoore4776]

what makes you think that? China and Russia are super powers with thousands of nukes.

[@hanzo8120]

The ending is hilarous, I mean we would turn this planet into nuclear dust and just doing nuclear holocaust to ourselves in WW3. but thank you for the sponsors of the game world war 3 etc., was just the icing on the cake.👌👍

[@SeraphusInferis]

There's no way that was an accident! LOL

[@Tijaayy]

The game is literally just this video but you control it😂

[@PatrickMenesesYTOfficial4945]

I like that ending, no more suffering

[@jedi4049]

@@PatrickMenesesYTOfficial4945 underrated ending lol

[@seiji-kun9488]

we're just a dust in the universe. i guess a nuclear dust is much cooler.

[@spacetragedy]

Hour 1 war starts, hour 2 France surrenders...again...😂😂😂

[@ChuckMccanless-hk4rw]

Canada surrendering quickly after France

[@zachtaylor8222]

France is a top 5 military power with the strongest historical military tradition who has the second highest amount of experience in fighting wars over the last 40 years. Yall need to read a GD history book that isn't about the one bad war they had.

[@kevinvangils5065]

@@zachtaylor8222 You’re the one needing to read a history book. France has the 11th best military as of 2024

[@repostifyou9457]

Plot twist: This isn't an alternate universe.

[@boomyoulookingforthis1362]

POV: This isn’t a point of view but the world you actually live in.

[@ShagWitTheBag]

@@boomyoulookingforthis1362 no way this would go down like this

[@fredriks91]

Language is not an issue. Italians Germans and Poles etc have become significantly better at English just over the two-three decades I've been able to observe. And remember: some might sound broken in spontaneous conversations with a lot of random topics with words and phrases some might haven't thought of in English before. But speaking around industry topics and jargons is a piece of cake.

[@puranapuu4252]

Dude, Italians who lives even in Aust NZ US UK having difficulty speaking English

[@Neverest.]

Thats cool but your observations are irrelevant. Language is an issue and translation is needed. Only about 34% of Italians can speak English for example, and some of those peoples levels are quite low. Less than 40% of Polish speak English and under 10% speak it fluently. In a world war, translation is needed because language is an issue. You're just wrong with this comment.

[@zarbi64]

@@puranapuu4252 It's not hard to understand basic broke english

[@fuzzblightyear145]

honestly, I know plenty of Europeans who speak better english than many locals I know 😁😁

[@J-C.Denton]

@@fuzzblightyear145 Why wouldn't they be fluent and well versed at English? English is an official language of the European Union and English was literally invented in Europe. lol

[@proteus404]

Next you should do World War 4 .. Crickets vs Cockroaches

[@Yippee-kiyay-Mclain]

The crickets would win, with their high numbers of support ants, as the inferior support for the cockroaches from the beetles means that the war would end rather quickly

[@thelyonsden4937]

This video is five months old, but knowing what we know now, this video gives way too much credit to Russia’s armed forces.

[@theapple3160]

not really, ukraine has fully nato aid and support, without this it would cease to exist, if world war 3 started ukraine would not get as much of the vital aid as it would go to countries like poland and be spread out, rather than a bottleneck for russia in ukraine

[@chriswho12345]

better safe than sorry. same for the other power.

[@didon8460]

@@theapple3160 not so sure, it has nato support in term of technologic weaponary, but not so much in significative numbers. we also see that russian army is experiencing some huge problem due to corruption and logistic capabilities. You don't need technologic superiority to hold a front if your opponent is not capable of supllying his primar needs in ammunitions and material. Maybe no counterattacks, but holding the defences, gaining some time. 26 billions have been sent to ukraine, it is already a lot, but not so much compared to NATO financial capacities. US were spending 20 billions in irak each year just for the climatisation supply. imagine if it were really fully supplied in ukraine...

[@ServantofErra]

@@theapple3160 Believe it or not, no. NATO and the US has been deliberately sending Ukraine gimped munitions and weapon system. The oldest stuff they have in stock in order to avoid any advanced stuff falling into Russian, and therefore, Chinese and Iranian hands, as well as to avoid escalating the war. Ukraine has been holding easily with 40 to 50 year old systems.

[@tt128556]

@@theapple3160 It's far from full NATO support, they haven't even sent a single tank yet. Full support would mean sending fighter jets and other long-range weapon systems to really turn the tables.

[@alexmarrs7762]

Eh....this relies too heavily on a "perfect scenario." Simply put, Russia would suffer immense logistical and attritional problems and it cannot launch a coordinated attack between it's sea, air & land forces. China has serious equipment issues, no body armor and most of it's troops consist of "spoiled brats." There is an actual term for it, I just can't recall it. Not to mention the lack of drone warfare. Simply put, Russia and China would not be able to pull off anything to that scale. Maybe in the next 50 years or so.

[@alvarohernandez8287]

but the outcome would be the same if they declared war, no? talking about the use of nuclear weapons

[@Minamoto_1]

Little emperors

[@seanthomxx2694]

Thank you. Also, it seems weird that Infographic is giving the Chinese air power so much credibility when they did a video about their failures, including the J-10 and their trying master carrier landings.

[@zenpai5998]

@@seanthomxx2694 it just came out that Chinas population will start to decline this year as opposed to next decade so maybe they’re being paid off to give china a handicap.

[@coleanderson8035]

And what this shows especially at the start shows nato amd specifically the us doing absolutely nothing until china already strikes which is extremely unrealistic

[@leonard6536]

When I’m nervous about this stuff I come to this channel to lighten the mood but then it is all back again before the sponsors are thanked.

[@andrewwallace2576]

At the time of writing, I am only 19 minutes in. However, I have to say, I enjoy The Infographics Show neutrality when creating videos like this. They do not choose sides necessarily, and they do not beat around the bush on a lot of their videos. Watching at 31 minutes I cannot get over the fact that they have not really expressed the idea of Africa and South America in this video. The issue these days is that a world war is simply that... a world war. Not only will we experience tension with those that we "US" deal with daily. We acquire new threats everywhere. Whether these threats can be dealt with and potentially turned with us against our enemy is one thing. But we still have to take into consideration of these two continents. (Whether they're capable of doing any harm to us or not)

[@Oweywiwy]

Putin be like: interesting idea can't wait to try it

[@wcw209suck]

You had been watching too much main stream media. Had you watch independence media? There are peoples like Aaron Mate who are not paid by the government like CNN and NBC and are trying to find the truth.

[@doggydude2668]

Ik it's a joke but bro this is *world* war💀

[@zubzero9593]

@@doggydude2668 russia cant even beat Ukraine in 2 months let alone the entire EU 💀

[@soupbae3542]

@@zubzero9593 it's because Russia is the aggresor and they use tanks while their counterpart are just hiding and waiting to attack. Russia is being cautious to civilians.

[@soupbae3542]

@@zubzero9593 ukraine ranks 22 in most powerful military in the world. Russia are not underestimating that.

[@darenstroud6254]

I think this video over estimates the abilities of the Russian and Chinese military.

[@kyliepechler]

Not to mention it leaves out the use of nukes being deployed very early on.

[@benwatso]

Yea, it’s pretty biased

[@ghostofantarctica8216]

Maybe Russia, but Idk about China. Only China knows whats going on in China.

[@ghostofantarctica8216]

Chinas policy is to get Taiwan to join China peacefully. If all efforts fail, military force will be used as a last resort

[@Today97129]

Yea overestimating is better than underestimating

[@kdakan]

Each hour in this video should be a day or so in a real war. Ground operations are never that fast, every capturing of a city or even a town must be calculated based on intelligence collected, a battle is not a fist fight but rather a chess play.

[@SarcasticTruth117]

I agree. This video is mostly based on paper stats. For example, the amount of tanks and missiles each country holds. It's more of a show of brut force and nothing else. I doubt Russia and China would be half as successful as this video shows.

[@matthewbarlow982]

@@SarcasticTruth117 init evidence that this vid isn’t accurate is literally happening right now in Ukraine. Were they can’t even beat a singular country nvm 30 odd

[@CakePrincessCelestia]

Was my first thought as well, maybe even a week looking at how a certain operation currently is going...

[@python5827]

@@SarcasticTruth117 i doubt us would practically survive even a month if ww3 starts. Chinese will because they are Asians who can survive in nature. USA will be wiped out of world within 15 days if china and russia join hands

[@StevenSeagull6969]

Putin would launch all his nukes in the first hour of WW3 and then go hide in an underground bunker.

[@joellyneham1987]

As an Aussie, I love how you refer to us as a ‘major power’ 😂😂

[@richardofrijole6309]

When the United States is your close allie then you are world power.

[@braddles5639]

As a fellow Aussie, I actually came looking for this comment as I thought the same thing haha. I did look it up though. The Global Fire power Index has is at no. 17, between Germany and Israel.

[@Kryojenix]

'Straya!

[@joellyneham1987]

@@braddles5639 so we are above Israel, which has nuclear weapons? Wow I have new respect for our defence forces.

[@jacksonpettit4690]

@@joellyneham1987 that's because a treaty between the USA and the UK allows Australia to have nuclear armed fleets

[@jynxyouowemeasoda5066]

I love how this channel went from just facts to theoretical with facts looked at to make possible outcomes it makes it interesting

[@shanep2369]

🤣 right 🤭

[@necrogenesis1981]

This isn't a theory, this is the inevitable future at this rate.

[@EmperorProd]

@@necrogenesis1981 if Russia nukes America or Ukrainie

[@necrogenesis1981]

@@EmperorProd which is going to happen, Putin is crazy. I might as well skip writing my will since nobody will be left anyway.

[@EmperorProd]

@@necrogenesis1981 might as well try to enjoy life while we can

[@slyfox8900]

Wow, that ending though, "end with the world in ashes" - "THANKS TO OUR SPONSOR!"

[@sisuriffs]

After doing so much in WW2, looks like Canada pretty much sits this one out, except as generalized NATO forces (English and French) until that last Doctor Strangelove hour of course. Intriguing video. Excellent work!

[@deanfirnatine7814]

Trudeau has let the Canadian military wither away to nothing

[@kevin9218]

The only thing I disagree with is the Chinese missile strike sinking one and heavily damaging multiple carriers. Looking at a carrier you might think such a hulking beast should be easy to hit, but when you consider the difficulty of targeting something from such range in the middle of the ocean moving in unpredictable ways, and the lack of ability to change the trajectory of a post-reentry hypersonic missile.. the number of missiles you would need to saturate a large enough area of ocean to have a decent chance of landing even a single hit is staggering.

[@shemyazadrolfossendam8156]

The aircraft Carrier is the modern equivalent of the battleship it is far more vulnerable to attack and would not Prove as decisive as it has been in prior military engagements

[@rameira2716]

@@shemyazadrolfossendam8156 Yeah, an aircraft carrier is the modern equivalent of a ship that uses a completely different weapons system and doctrine to hit its targets and to defend itself. ???????????????????????????? This is ignoring the fact they have uranium reactors, a classified top speed that eclipses most ships of its class, CIWS, air assets, the ability to not need refueling for the better half of TWO decades, advanced radar, and an entire complimentary element to further defend them from "hypersonic missile threats". ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Yeah bro, just the battleship of our time.

[@AsreiMurasame]

@@shemyazadrolfossendam8156 With one major exception it moves far faster than a battleship (top known is 41 knots but actual top speed is classified) aka they can go faster than 41 knots at full speed and they're loaded with CIWS's.

[@MichaelSmith-lm5sl]

Also they have laser now

[@jc2782]

That was the least believable part, the author bought into Chinese missile cope as well as Russian Air defence cope. The only way those numbers are remotely possible is if the carriers where immediately near Taiwan engaging the Chinese navy nit in the pacific dodging "600" missiles.

[@getgaijoobed6219]

Some of the things mentioned in this video are absolute best case scenario outcomes. For example, yes, Taiwan has diesel electric submarines (10:38), but they date from WW2 (though they have a modern one in development). Another example is that in a conflict in the Pacific, China would probably target the in air refueling tankers using their J-20s (which was literally designed to be a stealthy long-range missile bus, perfect for this role) instead of engaging superior US air power head on, thus bringing the curse of distance on the USAF.

[@samuelelrod7421]

But the tankers would have escorts. Plus us satellites watching anything coming their way. They could leave or have interceptors come in.

[@sixwingproductions]

i highly doubt chian has enough j-20's to even deploy them. like right now russia isn't deploying it's latest gear when it wouled be the perfect time to show what it can do. the problem is all the new toys can't do what china and russia are claiming and exsist in very small numbers likely not even being operational due to political corruption in arms procurment in these countries.

[@getgaijoobed6219]

@@samuelelrod7421yes, they will probably be escorted. I’m just saying that’s probably what the J-20 was designed for, considering that the bay on that thing is approximately the same size as the long range PL-15. I disagree with the satellite thing though, even ships are hard to detect via satellite alone, so I’m curious as to what makes you think that satellites (even ones in geostationary orbits) would be able to immediately pick up and track fast moving jets?

[@Oppteekap]

@@getgaijoobed6219 it is possible to track planes via satellites. However expensive and impractical that is

[@downix]

@@samuelelrod7421 satellites are not real-time. Sure, they can tell you 8 hours later, but for real time you would need AWACS, which would be less useful against the J-20.

[@ProfessorxVile]

1) Watch the movie "Threads" 2) Use this as motivation to develop an 'exit plan' that can be quickly enacted in the event of nuclear war 3) Sit back and wait, you've done all you can do

[@randomtransportguyx4397]

I live in Sheffield I'm not making that mistake again

[@dmarino1752]

If it’s any consolation, most nukes these days aren’t city busters so they only affect somewhere in between 7-20 miles I think. Not to mention most targets would be military targets rather than just attacking every city.

[@LionofMandalore]

@@dmarino1752 Military locations and large food supplies. RIP wheat fields 🌾

[@evorock]

@@randomtransportguyx4397 have you been listening to 4 minutes of threads by the atomic hobo. If not, I strongly recommend it. It's a fantastic podcast!

[@The_Drifter_13]

Testament and The Day After are also worth watching.

[@lucasplaygames1313]

I play Conflict of Nations since 2020 and this video give me an idea to win the half of the world in CON WW3!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!!!!!!

[@DovydasRybakas]

I love how for the end you hope a good ending. "And the world will end up in ashes..."

[@Defender78]

the burning oil in the sea 16:12 yikes! good idea tho

[@epic_moments1000]

african countries will survive.!!!!

[@DovydasRybakas]

@@epic_moments1000 survive what?

[@Sometimes_Happiness]

So which interstate problems that are currently ongoing could combine to create WW3? I've got the following: 1. China v. Taiwan 2. Russia v. NATO 3. North Korea v. South Korea 4. Pakistan v. India 5. Iran v. Israel 6. Iran v. Saudi Arabia 7. Russia v. Japan 8. China v. Vietnam .... am I missing any?

[@CodeUK93]

Britain v. Argentina (Fawklands 2.0) seems like a possibility (china has recently been backing Argentina’s claim to the island(s).

[@tomfooIeryz]

Israel v. Palestine

[@soupbae3542]

China vs america China vs Southeast asian countries.

[@fault.]

Me v You 😤😤

[@__Man_]

I'm assuming Russia and Nato. Russia has threatened the west repeatedly, and ordered that the west stop supplying equipment to Ukraine. Russia state news has said that the sinking of the Moskva has already started WWIII, since the west supplied the missiles that sunk it.

[@iphoneman1231]

Hey just wanted to let ya know when you showed the pictures for the f22 and f35, those were both the f35! The F-22 isn't a single thruster jet like the F35! Just wanted to clarify for other viewing, no biggie; love your videos!

[@nicholasniemann1176]

Also a bunch of country’s have f35s

[@bryanpayton1168]

I thought someone else had to notice that, lol.

[@ewyattgd5411]

the vertical and horizontal stabilizers are also different

[@iphoneman1231]

@@ewyattgd5411 there are a LOT of key differences, but I figured thrusters was just the easiest thing I could point out that the average person (who doesent know anything about jets) would understand as a visual difference between the two.

[@awesomealol0]

nerds

[@TheBetterLampMonkey]

Credits to the people who caused world war 3 for a video

[@TheDCGuitar13]

The part of war people never think about is even when outclassed, the enemy will inevitably take sons away from their mothers. Our advanced gear doesent come with 9 lives

[@onegoodthought6581]

Policy in US says any new draft shall be gender neutral. So next time sons and daughters will be going to war.

[@MrArthoz]

Taking sons away is the least of the problem. Nukes will take everything away...all life and all hope for a future in an irradiated environment. Well, hopefully just the region around Russia, China, Europe and USA...we in the Southeast Asia would just sit back and wait for the show to end. It will be a future of hardship and economic disaster...but at least we'll come out intact compared to any other nations foolish enough to get involved with ww3. I guess being the only civilized world left, Asia, Africa and South America would be the future world power next. Also pray there won't be a decade of nuclear winter. Here in the tropics we might just finally get to know what snow is like...colder climates might suffer terribly. In history of past natural disaster, there have been recorded of year without summer. Terrible time of sickness, famine and death.

[@troutwarrior6735]

I think Russian capabilities were highly overstated in this scenario

[@eclkt]

Yup, Russia can’t even beat Ukraine.

[@thegalhorowitz]

Even Germany and Turkey alone could hold Russia down just 1-2 members of Nato. Its all about high level collaboration, newest technology ( which Russia doesnt produce and morale is extremely low which is the main issue... )

[@princeguillermo347]

@@eclkt yea without US they can obliterate Ukraine in a week or so

[@sanjuro1180]

@@thegalhorowitz Would the morale also be very low when the Nato tanks will drive into Russia? i don't think so.. so it better is not to count in moral in a video like this.

[@Taed]

Well you gotta think about it the entire world was fooled by Russias TRUE military might...On paper the video is pretty accurate but in reality we have seen that Russia isn't nearly as formidable as we all thought...I still think China would prove to be a different beast on its own though

[@Leifthrasir]

The Gripen, Rafale, and Eurofighter are partial stealth planes as they are built out of radar absorbing composite materials, giving them a much greater reduced radar cross section compared to other 4th gen planes. Though not as reduced as the F-22 or F-35.

[@spvillano]

True, they also failed to mention CAPTOR mines. A nice blanket of those, originally intended for the GIUK gap would do nicely in the Black Sea and in the strait along the Taiwanese coast.

[@hoghogwild]

As is the B-1B bomber. It has an RCS 100 times smaller than a B-52.

[@flair500]

F-22 and F-35 dont have as good radar "hiding" abilities as Rafale I think

[@didierpaya9069]

american channel, so...

[@makeitrain8812]

@@flair500 Rafale is nothing compared to f35 what

[@AzHwk]

Interesting video, you've told us the "how" now tell us the "why". 🤔 what's wrong with the places that they've got that makes leaders feel the need to invade other countries?

[@getgggged123]

I asked my dad about this when I was a teen. his response ill never forget. "so long as two men exist that are aware of each others existance, war is inevitable" it's in our nature.

[@N.O.V.V]

money

[@saiya2521]

@@getgggged123 “Only the dead have seen the end of war.” Plato

[@donaldpaluga]

War. War never changes

[@Geckorawasg]

Resources

[@SageTempest]

I really like these type of videos

[@Joe-42]

Me too

[@nolanlol547]

Were bonna die

[@jd_kreeper]

Hello checkmark.

[@admiringthemoon4579]

Same!

[@TheLazyLifterr]

Why does this feel like an npc comment😂

[@diversejoe617]

Ww3: it's only a matter of time Ww4 and 5: *Coming soon to theaters*

[@phantomizer3542]

I love the fact that the gun australia is holding is actually upsidedown

[@WineOnTheDime]

Well...that was a casually neutral tone for the ending...

[@fusiondrip]

Choose your strategy wisely, will you: 1. Focus on building up country's economic might 2. Politics game and forge long lasting alliances 3. Declaring war on everyone and rely on military prowess Also Putin: 3 is not that bad tho

[@raidang]

He did all of the above what a chad

[@widodoakrom3938]

First strategy is the best

[@anasqader3851]

China is doing the first one

[@Max-jy9qb]

Finland: am I a joke to you? Great video but seriously, how did they manage to ignore Finland so hard?

[@therealpinkyskull]

because the fins are still using Viking equipment.

[@CakePrincessCelestia]

Give the Finns all those Note 7s and they'll mop the floor with the Russian Army :)

[@davidd6972]

Haha! Funny Meme!

[@ReZaReKtA340]

You're so right , Finland would be capital if there was a conflict with Russia...

[@KyleBc95]

There wouldnt be much special about finland during world war 3 they would back nato and thats it.. I'm from canada and the same. We would just back the USA

[@Wonkabar007]

And it all ends with a "Beneath the Planet of the Apes" Alpha-Omega cobalt bomb 🙈💥

[@gabormarkhardy7324]

With bomb worshipping mind reading mutants

[@MrGean83]

Called Monkeypox lol

[@kaziu312]

🗽

[@nnk-ecdd5425]

I know not with what weapons world war III will be fought, but world war IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -Albert Einstein

[@DavidJr.11]

Thanks for the Help! You just increased my Anxiety!

[@jordaniansniper934]

Then turn on your brain and think.... Russia wont touch any other country for YEARS, for sure as war in Ukraine is total failure for them: 0 major objectives during 56 days, heavy losses and their economy is being destroyed. So dont live in unnecessary fear and enjoy ur life....

[@DavidJr.11]

Not all wars was Fought out of logic and comprehensible reasons and it's a Fact!

[@rich3371]

Russia can't even take over one country 28 times smaller, so I'm not worried about them but China I'm not so sure about

[@pedrogonzalez9406]

@Coca cola That's not true, Nato, soldiers, airplanes, tanks, and so on, are not fighting against russian counterparts in Ukraine. Their providing wepons and intelligence.

[@antonijegaric1910]

Its not a full scale war on ukraine, its like when USA occupies another country, thats why they are doing bad

[@JamesFotografia]

@@pedrogonzalez9406 but we can't say russia is fighting only Ukraine .

[@emanueldelacruz1101]

@@JamesFotografia Russia is not even fighting. No war was declared and only have sent to Ukraine like 15% of their army?

[@warrencr86]

@@emanueldelacruz1101 what? Lol they mobilized 200k troops. Do you think Russia has a military of 1.5mil active duty? Because I can tell you with certainty they do not. They have 300,000 active ground troops

[@grahamkeithtodd]

as the events in Ukraine unfold (and have been unfolding since they started a war over 7 weeks ago), the russian's navy,army and airforces have shown they are NOT up to the task of fighting NATO...and most of their kit used in that war, has been shown to not work too well!....

[@x_Torment]

We will smash Putin. Their best bet is to hide behind nuclear threats.

[@justarandomguylol6481]

Yea

[@infernusifrit9348]

Yes i agree. The hypothesis here inthis episode must be based on disinformation.

[@gunslinger9171]

Even if Russia used nukes they are so old. They would probably blow themselves up or corruption is so high government officials probably sold off their nuclear payloads years ago, lol

[@pajserlatacchini9400]

Yall are listening to news propaganda. Russia is taking its time and taking it easy on Ukrain. With most vehicles already damaged or used. It was part of their country and it has valuable rescurses (gas) so they are in no hurry to counquer them. If Russia shows real agression Ukrain woild fall in matrer of days. By the news and videos on yt you would think Ukrain is going into Moskow 😂 when in realty Zelenski is begging and crying for help everyday and pyshed more and more in a conrner beging and crying for help from Nato 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@The.Sages.Corner]

The only thing here is the Geneva Convention forbid nukes. Granted War is War, but if any country wanted to "redraw lines"; then nukes wouldnt be used for occupancy.

[@pantoastado1264]

It shocks me more people don't realize we keep getting closer day by day

[@superyamky]

I already realised it ever since the invasion of Ukraine started

[@brandonfaubert7180]

Yea I get that. We are 3 months since your comment and we are that much closer.

[@pantoastado1264]

@@brandonfaubert7180 It just keeps escalating 😭😭

[@egreeno]

Long live Taiwan, long live Lithuania, long live Estonia, long live Latvia, and long live Ukraine. 🇹🇼🇱🇹🇪🇪🇱🇻🇺🇦

[@stefantsarev4442]

This video had some major misses: - Iran was not included in the picture. They have signed a strategic partnership with Russia to aid each other in case of a war. Iran will aid with oil and other supplies, but more importantly, it has a strong Navy which implements swarm tactics specifically designed to battle US Navy Carrier groups. It may either attack the US 5th fleet in Bahrain directly, or block the Strait of Hormuz, thus preventing reinforcements; - India has been a strong strategic ally to Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union. Russia has supplied the Indian Forces with many weapons, including an aircraft carrier (INS Vikramiditya is a Kiev-class carrier, the same as Admiral Kusnetsov) and SU-57 5th gen fighters. With an agreement to split the Indian Ocean into areas of influence, India, Iran and China may block the US Navy from getting any aid from its 5th Fleet in Bahrain. - Turkey is part of NATO, but has strong economic ties with Russia and is often pressured by the European Union. It is possible that it may change sides, in order to solidify its area of influence and help Iran as a fellow Islamic state; - South Korea, as a strong ally to NATO, will aid Taiwan, and that may be an issue, because that will trigger a response from North Korea, forcing the country to fight on two fronts: defending its own border and helping the Allied forces of US, Japan and Australia against China. The South Korean forces are great and well-prepared, so they will be a significant aid to the Allies. - North Korea, being a strong ally to China, will aid China in its pursuit to conquer Taiwan, as well as defend itself against the Allied forces. It will also use this as an opportunity to cross the 38th Parallel to "reclaim" South Korea, effectively re-igniting the Korean War. North Korean hackers will aid China against any Western breaches, which will significantly strengthen The Great Firewall of China; - We may even see the Taliban join China, since they recently became allies; - It is very important to notice that most of the NATO forces, specifically the US Pacific fleet in San Diego and Pearl Harbor, may have serious issues with navigating towards Taiwan in their process to send reinforcements. Why? Because they won't have GPS: in case of World War III, one of the first things that will be taken out will be the satellites used for navigation. Ultimately, we may see several fronts in the advancement of WWIII - a Polish, a Taiwanese, a Korean and a Persian, possibly one in the Balkans as well if Turkey switches sides. Either way, the war is going to be much more interesting and versatile than the video shows.

[@iBeReaper]

It would be nice if the world could just get along for once

[@LukasBulevicius]

after we done with communist contries - yes we can get along :)

[@Elemblue2]

Ill get along with people who arnt slavers. Regardless of if they actually admitting to it or not, or call what their doing something else. Thats not a dig at the US, or any historical dig. I mean literally, the countries and leaders that have and will continue to treat their people like numbers. Thats the existential threat, and it will never go away, because deviants will always appear to fill potential power niches. In a way, that is depressing. But in another way, they are the wetstone that keeps the blade sharp. Assuming they dont win.

[@popcultureprogrammer2171]

@@LukasBulevicius No. Authoritarian regimes. (which includes communist countries) And also, peace is just countries taking a breather

[@OneFreeMan17]

We can. It’s the corrupt governments and corporations that are causing this

[@luckysonuvagun]

@@popcultureprogrammer2171 Y'all this is why we aren't at peace

[@syednaseeruddin5689]

If there is anything I have learned throughout my competitions is, you should never underestimate your enemy as that might end up being your downfall. Not just Russia with Ukraine & one more nation I can't remember but even US with Afghanistan & Vietnam as well. Countries are just powerful in name only, it's the soldiers that fight with determination, courage, no fear and true spirit can even overcome big nations like US & Russia. There are numerous heroes who changed the outcome of the battles in the past from impossible to a miracle. If there exists such a gallant person in any of the sides, then anything is possible. There are many examples but one recent example which I learned is, an old-fashioned Thai Ki-43 (1930s plane) took down an American P-51 Mustang in a dogfight even though it was outclassed in everything, but the pilot used his surroundings to bring his opponent where he wanted before unleashing power & putting him down. Though, he was also injured and later on succumbed to his wounds.

[@thorstambaugh1520]

Never underestimate the power of America unleashed with no battlefield rules of engagement

[@adnanadil4498]

The title- "World War III" and the end- "Goodbye, wonderful world", say it all. :)

[@omsymosh]

Very captivating, kudos to the scriptwriter they got me hooked for 33 minutes.

[@stephenlade5574]

I can't help but wonder if this is some fuktup cia site......

[@JasonMomos]

Propaganda have to be enticing.

[@robbiebankz]

I can only imagine how much work this videos took to create. Awesome work🙌 These videos are more intense then a lot of Hollywood movies. Imagine if all of this where to happen. Nothing short of intense.

[@screechingonions2365]

I think your favorite word is intense

[@pepedon1924]

Intense hehe

[@ouiouimonami8704]

Trolllolololol

[@randallvickers8509]

He just gives Russia and China too much credit got to remember America's been at war for 20 years they're pretty good at it

[@The_Conqueeftador]

Even just 4 months ago you should of known how silly this video was based on Russia's performance.

[@xungngo]

You giving russia conventional warfare a lot of credit.

[@stephenbachman132]

The thing i don't agree with is. The capabilities of Russia. We have seen in recent months that they are disorganised, lack decent training for their men, an seem to blunder a fair bit in lethal operations. I don't actually think they would hold a advantage over NATO forces at all.

[@hurricaneace143]

NATO is considered they great adversary so alot of the advanges Ukraine is getting from Russian low morale would be non existent in the big war. Plus, its more likely that Russia would open up the offensive against NATO with a major nuke strike, primarily as an EMP

[@williamwchuang]

Also, we have a lot of drones and decoys.

[@kevynwolf]

I think they tried to make the point that Russia hypothetically made some structural changes after the invasion of Ukraine, since this video would be taking place in the future, not in the present day

[@subtropicalpermaculture]

you've seen propaganda

[@peteribssrybka4502]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure that pound for pound nato is more powerful than russia. Considering UK, Germany, Poland, and France are very strong alone nevermind the rest of nato

[@jonathanbell306]

If only we directed all that effort, energy and money into massages, mushrooms and pizza we'd all be so much better off

[@tylerredforge5563]

I'm all for that, except mushrooms

[@davidfinch7407]

I'm not so sure. One B-1 bomber can cost &1,000,000,000. That is a terrifying amount of massages we would all have to endure, and we would all be dead from trying to ingest all that pizza.

[@theodoredy]

Meanwhile Russia trying to conquer one Ukrainian city for 3 month: 🗿

[@astonTH]

Deliberately. If they wanted to they could. Rather elongate the war & bring the world into financial ruin (currently happening and a lot more evident a month further on)

[@philipbarton2056]

Six months ago I would have agreed with him but Ukraine has shown that the Russian threat is massively over estimated.

[@Aromatize]

As a veteran its painful to watch this because unless you serve you dont understand military concepts. this is like reading a comic book and at no point accurate as we even see today.

[@streamer_services]

As it is with most things in life.... Not the ending that you want but the ending that you will probably get and deserve.

[@matttuballa4907]

There’s always no happy ending when it comes to war 😢

[@berennicholas5003]

what if no one gets injured no building or anything damaged and all that happens is the sudden advancement in tech due to the wartime we get a new iphone

[@dumbshit2353]

@@berennicholas5003 so whats the name of the new drug you are high on rn

[@zoomzoom3510]

in fact we are advancing a lot i tech , soon Artificial Intelligence AI of Elon Musk is advancing a lot and phones are the most used , TV soon won't be needed

[@TheIndispensableOpposition]

​@@berennicholas5003 I don't think you know what war is

[@kodeska8784]

Beast titan: "Isn't war such a terrible thing"

[@di-vini-ty876]

hello info show! love this channel, hope y’all doing well

[@XX-qd6ke]

“We can never invade America,” Japanese Admiral Yamamoto has been quoted as saying. Yamamoto, who attended college in America, explained his logic this way: “There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.” He was right.

[@jackaljackinfinity8742]

I just hope World War 3 doesn’t happen….

[@dsnews2212]

It will unfortunately

[@lordevil7687]

Already begun

[@gab9520]

It will

[@widodoakrom3938]

Hope so

[@eatingshrimps]

It will

[@Eyebagdude]

DONT GIVE ME A HEAT ATTACK LIKE THAT

[@kmg9359]

But whyyy ):

[@Eyebagdude]

@@kmg9359 I thought that I was gonna die at the hands of the Russians sorry if a was a bit mad at them

[@jordaniansniper934]

@@Eyebagdude but russia wont win conventional war vs NATO in any scenerio xd and nuclear war is suicide for them so that's impossible too. Do you see what's happening in Ukraine? Their losses are huge, it takes time to make it up and still 0 major objectives during 56 days... So Russia wont do anything to NATO territory and ur fear is unnecessary

[@nareeeely]

Day by day would be more accurate than hour by hour. Awesome work.

[@billy2069]

Yeah I disagree hour by hours makes sense. This stuff has to happen quick if the attacks are over Taiwan and Western Europe. If they do it slow and allow NATO and Allies to mobilize it could be a massive loss of lives with no result creating unrest from within the attacking countries.

[@alexaxy3328]

Awesome work? This guy thinks Russia will defeat the whole Europe ... Meanwhile, Russia is losing to Ukraine.

[@nareeeely]

@@alexaxy3328 Theyre not, actually NATO is losing. Their economy is going down energy prices are at their highest, the UK prime minister just resigned. Dont listen to CNN just watch the broader picture.

[@alexaxy3328]

@@nareeeely nice try, troll.

[@nareeeely]

@@alexaxy3328 lol ok

[@SingletonD]

10 months into the Russian-Ukrainian war, the thought of Russia having air control over any theater of war is LOL moment.

[@nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo1262]

KEEP ON DOING THE GREAT WORK MAN

[@RetroFoamStudios]

Haha fortnite picture

[@Ikazune_]

it isn’t just one guy

[@nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo1262]

@@RetroFoamStudios haha yeah

[@RetroFoamStudios]

@@nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo1262looks like not anymore

[@nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo1262]

@@RetroFoamStudios oh ok

[@hereitcomes3912]

I live around 300km from ukrainian border, and this channel is not making my anxiety any better. 🥶

[@ivanrizzo5513]

This was more entretaiment than a hollywood movie . Seeing this at this moment in time makes me think how humanity is walking on very thin line and things can go south in a moment.