Thanks mate, yea the latest rad is from a MR2 spyder i think, its a 3 pass one the original one I used was only 2 pass and was marginal at best, plus upgraded to bigger water pumps. Water cooling is good now, Oil cooling was still a problem and have added a massive oil cooler at the back of the car where i had the diffuser. The original engine had a decent oil cooler from the factory so i think oil temp is an issue with these engines. I have tested the suspension updates, they made a good improvement, and the car is much more predictable we've since discovered that the factory pickup points of the hawk induce some rear bump steer, was an easy fix, just had to move the trailering arm inboard point 20mm closer to the chassis rail, haven't tested that one, but should be further improvements.

Hey mate, due to cancelation of events and then getting the alfa ready for a rally, that didn't happen I havnt, I havnt driven the stratos in anger yet, but we've booked it in for a track day soon, and I'll try and make an update vid, cheers

2mm,which I ended up reenforceing on the top mount

@@105colin nice one cheers for that. I had started trying to replicate my billet 106 maxi uprights in steel for a more budget friendly option and I used 4mm so I was probably going way ott then! Cheers for coming back to me.

Me too! There has been a massive delay as I got the alfa out of retirement for a while pending a rally that never happened, but I'm back on the stratos now and test day should be soon!

Glad you enjoyed it, happy to help out

Solid plan!

Thanks mate appreciate the comments, glad your getting something out of the vids!

Thanks mate, the pedal box actually worked out really well and is not cramped at all with almost no offset either, I think the c bracket your referring to gets covered by a heal rest anyway, cheers

Hahaha, love the comments, thanks mate! Cheers

Haha, awsome, it's gone global!

Thanks mate, don't worry I can let the smoke out with the best of them!

Yea got the MAP sensor working, but the signal was still a bit uneven to use as the main laod points, so sticking with the TPS for now

I've always heard throttles don't like MAP based load?

@@105colin thanks for the quick response. Uneven as in not balancing out enough? After being with TPS based load for a while it's ok, but i'm jealous of the accuracy and stable AFR of MAP. 🙂 Did you consider putting the sensor remote to the vacuum tube? some say this will balance things out better.

Thanks mate!

Спасибо друг, да, это была забавная сборка

Hahaha, nice one!

Thanks mate, really appreciate the commentl

Thanks mate

Cheers

Yea, got to love that sound!

Thanks mate

Cheers mate

Pretty much!

Thanks mate, yea, it definitely punches above its weight!

Thanks mate Unlikely....

Appreciate it mate, no worries, yea always some wacky cars over there, I'll see what I can find!

Thanks for the comment, I probably should have spoken a bit more about outright roll center height vs roll axis angle. As the rear RC moves closer to the CG the weight transfer will happen quicker as it's not being reacted through the springs and dampers, which usually leads to more OS, and harder to read. Like everything with suspension setup, it's all a balancing act! Cheers mate

Thanks mate, yep that sounds terrifying!