But it was made to appear so.

You will believe the quran, when later jesus will come to this world and claim that he just a prophet..at that time you will follow Jesus faith and entering islam because jesus is muslim..jesus no alcohol, no eat pork, and bow to god..

Jesus pbuh can predict his own death but doesn’t know the hour is wild what a weak human god u must follow if u believe that nonsense

And again he had a good start but nah he’s just talking shit is this like a Christian behavior atleast he don’t scream

Bible is very false

It has lots of lies and mistakes in it the Bible

Allah has a sweet been there

Contradiction means when 2 sentences of a book are totally opposite to each other. Quran has already cleared his position that muslims believe jesus was not crucified and someone else was crucified and Jesus(PBUH) was raised so thats the belief of muslims it is not contradiction. u can't find any contradiction so u said crucifixion is in history and muslims are saying that Jesus(PBUH)was not crucified we believe that crucifixion was done but not of jesus but other person. How much sure are you and how do u know that the person who was crucified was Jesus (PBUH)....?

Rookie mistake. The kid needs a lot more than playfield tantrum. Just read the very next sentence. Besides Quran is talking about internal coherence and contradiction. Not contradicting other sources. If it had no new or contradictory items, the bible was enough, never needing the Quran.

Oh Allah. Give this guy a visdom. or at least bravity to quote all the verse without taking part of it. You are talking about historians well done. And Qur’an says about those ones who believe that Isa a.s. was crusified. I believe that he is alive, also that he will be sent back to earth as his mission is not ended yet. If you would know what he will do as a first thing, you would not talk like you know everything and claim that a creations knows more then a creator.

Educate yourself before speaking !

Out of respect and curiosity I watched your video and here is my response below. 1. Firstly, Sela cannot be referring to the Edom city since it does not fit into the context. If, for argument's sake, we're assuming that the servant in this verse is referring to Jesus, then the context would be talking about people singing for joy and shouting praises for Jesus. However this is extremely unlikely since these people would have to be firstly Arabs (as defined by Kedar), secondly Christians (since they are celebrating Jesus showing up), and thirdly inhabiting the area of Edom (which Arabs are not natively from). These 3 factors are an impossible combination as there are no historical records of such a group of people existing at that place. However, when referring to Sela in Medina, we literally have the recorded nasheed (song) that was sang for the Prophet Muhammad PBUH upon his arrival at Medina called 'Talaʽ al-Badru ʽAlayna'. This would be too much of a coincidence due to how it matches up perfectly, and therefore has to be the fulfillment of the prophecy in Isaiah 42. 2. Secondly, just because the word 'Lord' is used that doesn't mean that it is referring to God/Yahweh. The Bible uses the title of 'Lord' to refer to many people such as kings, fathers, husbands etc. in verses of Genesis. Therefore the title of Lord is to denote the level of respect this individual, particularly as a military leader which the Prophet PBUH was. More importantly, it's ridiculous to imply that Yahweh is marching out to war, stirring up his zeal and raising a battle cry like a footsoldier. It's very clearly talking about a human, and it's insulting to think that the almighty God needs to raise a battle cry to scare his foes. 3. Thirdly, Jesus says "I was sent ONLY to the lost sheep of Israel" in Matthew 15:24. The word 'Only' clearly and unambiguously means that he was sent to no other tribe. Now yes, he heals a gentile woman but only doing so reluctantly after initially refusing due to her being a gentile, (he also calls the same woman a dog 2 verses later). This discrimination between treatment of a Jew and Gentile clearly shows how one group is prioritised exclusively and the other group isn't even an afterthought. When Jesus says he is the light of the world, the word "world" doesn't necessarily refer to all of humanity but more likely to the entire Jewish community. This can be seen in other examples, such as Romans 4:13 where Abraham and his offspring (referring to Isaac) would be "heir of the world". Obviously Abraham and Isaac weren't actually heir to the entirety of humanity, but rather they were heirs to the Israelites. Another example is in John 12:19 where a Pharisee refers to the Jewish following of Jesus as "the whole world has gone after him". Also, the use of "nations" in Matthew 28:19 also doesn't necessarily refer to the gentiles. Rather it's referring to the scattered Jewish people living among the Gentiles since Jews were spread across the Roman Empire living in many different "nations". This verse just proves that Jesus is trying to reach the Jews living outside of Judea. This can be seen in Matthew 10:5-6 where Jesus send his 12 disciples out with the following instructions 'Do not go among the gentiles or enter any town of the samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.' 4. Fourthly, in this section you are being incredibly dishonest. When referring to Jesus you jump to a completely separate chapter of Isaiah and ignore the apparent meaning of the text, however when referring to Muhammad PBUH you inconsistently laser-focus onto the apparent meaning. You can't have it both ways, and i'm quite frankly disappointed in the lack in the consistency in your approach. Anyways, Jesus clearly cried out in a loud voice saying "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" to which any reasonable person would immediately say this contradicts Isaiah. As for "raising his voice in the streets", this clearly suggests someone who raises his voice when it is unnecessary and obtrusive such as in the marketplace. The Prophet PBUH only raised his voice when it was necessary and beneficial to the Muslims such as during sermons and when delivering warnings. Why did you conveniently ignore the "in the streets" part? 5. Finally, the word "Torah" is most often translated as "law" in the Bible. One clear example is John 1:17 where "Law" is used interchangeably with "Torah". The Greek word for "law" here is "nomos", which is the Greek translation of the Hebrew word "Torah". Also it fits with the context of the verse since it literally says "till he has established justice in the Earth". Justice can only be achieved through application of law, and swapping out this correct term for instruction/teaching wouldn't make sense. The act of teaching someone doesn't inherently lead to justice since people can always reject teachings freely. However, people cannot reject the law without consequences and so no term other than "law" fits here.

ISLAM IS THE TRUTH

5 REASONS WHY ISAIAH 42 CANNOT BE ABOUT JESUS, BUT ABOUT MUHAMMAD ﷺ 1. Verse 6: “I will make you a light for the gentiles” - Jesus (AS) was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel (Matthew 15:24) - Muhammad ﷺ was sent to the Arabs who are gentiles. 2. Verse 2 “He will not shout or cry out” - According to Christians, Jesus cried for help on the cross - Muhammad ﷺ never cried out in such a humiliating way 3. Verse 10 “Sing to the Lord a new song” - Matthew 5:17 says Jesus came to fulfill the previous law, not to bring a new law - Muhammd ﷺ brought new law through revelation. The way the Quran is recited is also melodic like a song. 4. Verse 13 “Like a warrior he will stir up his zeal… and triumph over his enemies” - Jesus never went to war - Muhammad ﷺ took part in many wars, and gaining victory over the pagans multiple times 5. Verse 11 “Let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice” - Kedar refers to the second son of Ishmael, and thus refers to his descendents which are the Arabs.

Youre wrong lol. The quran clearly said in just the next verse (which you conveniently ignored) it "was appeared to them like he was crucified"...so of coz it will be in history because people thought he was indeed crucified when hes not. So no there is no error. Unlike the Bible with clear errrors.

Koufar. May Allah guide you brother.

You took the verse out of context. It clearly said that Jesus was not crucified, but that doesnt mean the man that was made to look like Jesus was not crucified. Make sure you do your research before you spread misinformed lies.

You know nothing of the Qur'an. The Qur'an says Jesus's (peace be upon him) crucification didn't happen but it was made to appear so. So obviously historians will think and record that he was crucified. Therefore, the Qur'an is consistent with history. And the Qur'an also says Jesus will die. But after he returns. You've made two claims, and none of them contradict the Qur'an.

Weak argument, when you use Christians as a source you blow up everything, the only reason Quran exists is that biblevwas forged obviously using the same logic

Here is the Error. The name John existed even before John was born. Surah Maryam 19:7 ˹The angels announced,˺ “O Zachariah! Indeed, We give you the good news of ˹the birth of˺ a son, whose name will be John-a name We have not given to anyone ...

Quran clearly confirms Jesus Crucifixion... [Quran 4:157] And for their saying, "We have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the Messenger of God." In fact, they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, BUT IT APPEARED TO THEM AS IF THEY DID . Indeed, those who differ about him are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it, except the following of assumptions. Certainly, they did not kill him. Very sound and clear states it appeared to them as if they did ... A Fact ... For the saying they did not kill or crucify Jesus is also true ... As No one can Kill or Crucify the Branch of God ... Jesus sacrificed His self for our sin and let His self be crucified . As the ultimate sign of Mercy of God . As He's own words also confirms ... John 10:17-18 KJV [17] Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. [18] No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father. God is no God of Confusion.. Religion is ... Ready or not .. Jesus is coming back.. And that is not Mohammad...

nonsens don’t read the next verse and it says it made to appear onto them so. Nonsense christians non-legs to stand on😅

They didn't kill him, nor did they crucify him, BUT IT APPEARED TO THEM SO... cutting that part out is dishonest because what else is history going to record?

Evidence pls …..

IF it isn't man made, then you have two gods. The words are considered uncreated and exist separately from each other. If you can accept that the Quran is not man made, then you can accept that Jesus is GOD in the flesh. ( the word became flesh). This is why Islam doesn't match up to their reality. Can you hold Allah in your hands and shake it?

You didn’t mention an error. You described a different opinion by the Quran. And yes Jesus will die…when he comes back !

U are wrong

The Quran says that a person was crucified in Jesus place and that the person was made to look like jesus

Typical Christian 😂

Don’t worry you have a chance to see him and talk to him God willing

I dont know whether to take this seriously or laugh at this. 1. There is NO 1st hand non-christian account of JESUS being crucified. There is account 3rd hand of A crucifixion event. Go look up Berabbas' first name. The clue is in there. 2. I died at John Crossant the catholic priest being referred to as non-christian 😂. Yes, I know you guys dont consider catholics Christian but does not mean he is not a Trinitarian lol. 3. And the references to OT are even more lolsome. 4. To the point about Quran. Quran has 3 things. Things known at the time (eg. jewish christian beleifs). Things not known but becomes clear later (eg: merging of the oceas, big bang, pulsing star). And things unknown still. Jesus will be in the last category that will only be revealed upon his reappearance. Something that is not revealed does not equate to contradiction.

but Dax, is it so impossible that God made someone to look like him to be cucified in his stead?? I heard that there were some early christian sects who believed that, I'll look it up but may be you know something about that. And of course then we are left wondering what might be God's intention from such a deception

Your heart is blind. The Quran doesn't deny the event of crucifixion, but Allah saved Jesus Pbuh, and they crucified someone else in his place.

Let’s see some actual references to Jesus dying on the cross not solely your quoted authors opinion.

Jesus ❤❤

This is an obvious error in the Quran.

“Israel is the son of God.” Does that mean the State of Israel or people of Israel should be worshipped too? If no, then why is Jesus being worshipped as God.

I once watched a video of Ahmed Deedat on the part about ‘Mohammedim’. He posited that the ‘im’ added in the end is basically a pluralisation that is used to convey respect in Hebrew. It’s similar to “We” that you often see in the Quran when referring to God. Secondly, your mention of Makmad pronunciation is probably only from linguistic nuances. For example, some French words with ‘ch’ are pronounced as sh, but in English ch could be pronounced as ‘k’ as in ‘chaos’ or ch as in ‘church’.

To my Moslem friends President Bush is also mentioned in the Holy Bible 😅. Leave the words games and trust on Jesus if u want eternal life, bcuz He is the only one who lead a blameless life, all other have something to talk about their lives.

In 1:25 the answer that we should give to "If the Quran said that God is a trinity, would you accept it?" I believe the correct answer is yes, as the verse 81 of chapter 43 (Al-Zokhrof) says: «Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “If the Most Compassionate ˹really˺ had offspring, I would be the first worshipper.”» And the 4rd verse of chapter 39 (Al-Zommar) also poses the question of God having a son: «Had it been Allah’s Will to have offspring, He could have chosen whatever He willed of His creation. Glory be to Him! He is Allah-the One, the Supreme.» It's something that one can only know through revelation, so once he trusts the message he accepts what the message says about that

You asked about free will that do we believe in free will brother Allah almighty says in the holy Quran that human beings is the best creation of almighty Allah in all the creation .Allah has given free will to human beings and ghosts wether to follow his commandments or not if any human being follow the commandments of Allah that human being becomes superior than angels because angels don’t have free will but humans have hope you understand

Do you know more than a thousand surah verses of the Quran clearly has been proven talking about the universe how it came into being and about science and the science just came to know about these things just 40 or 50 years back and imagine the Quran talks about these things 1400 years ago who could have known these things I just ask you a simple question do the modern day Torah and gospel speak about science and universe etc. however you should read the Quran inshallah Allah will guide you

Brother first thing you should read the Quran with meanings from first surah to the end 2nd when you give reference of a surah or verse then you should read in context and give reference otherwise people will be misguided misunderstood so please don’t just take one verse from among the chapters and say it says this read in context then you will understand inshallah and the Torah and the gospel were in the original scriptures even in the time of Muhammad pbuh both were corrupted that’s why the Quran was revealed to prophet Muhammad PBUH

Thank you very much Dax, a good rival is much better than a foolish friend, and watching your videos surely helps me understand both Christianity and Islam better than naik and the likes of him. About the argument of the paraclete in 4:40 I think I understood it a bit differently although probably it doesn't change much, but I think the argument was that the Greek word Paraclete itself means "the praised one", and he didn't mean the "original" Aramaic word which is indeed nowhere to be found, and he only said Aramaic inadvertently, and whoever made the slide in 13:50 also carried that error. I say that because I heard another small preacher also making the same argument after investigating it independenty from naik and asking a Greek linguist he knew. I incline towards this explanation, as quoting an Aramaic text that doesn't even exist would be an absurdly huge mistake to commit, even for naik probably

Thank you very much Dax !!! I thought I would undertand better the verses of the Qoran where God speaks to the christians if I listened to them, and so far you are the best one I found explaining what he disagrees with and asking questions 🙏🏼Thank you

Islam is the fastest breeding religion not growing there's difference

Sorry, Islam is fake evil, and I don't need to understand anything about that evil fake religion. Christians are not into religion. We just follow the true living God. Islam is over. Religion is over . We just need to turn to jesus christ

Yeshua akbar! Salam al masih!!

Yeshua Akbar 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

Wasnt relevant before...😂