i have 450 size drone motor which is 1100kv. can i use that motor for 250 size drone with small prop?
@FPVTeamLegit2 ай бұрын
To run 1100kv with 5-6" propellers, you would want to run the system on 6S voltage. Be sure that the rest of your equipment will tolerate 6S and test gradually... no promises from us that things will work out ;)
@5er5932 ай бұрын
Are there any blueprints for this wing?
@FPVTeamLegit2 ай бұрын
No blueprints for this original "hundo" as it was a one-off, but we're always thinking about large aircraft. Who knows what we may release in the future ;)
@apache55342 ай бұрын
mothership plans ?
@FPVTeamLegit2 ай бұрын
We may do a break-down of this aircraft in the future :) No plans available at this time.
@thenightvisionlab3 ай бұрын
Thank you a lot for this demonstration i just discovered in your channel. One question: i see that there is under the option "EXPOSURE", three "SHUTTER" modes for this camera: "AUTO", "MANUAL" and "FLICKER". Could you elaborate a bit more on the "MANUAL" one please (you were speaking only about the "AUTO" and "FLICKER", if i do not mistake myself)! Thank you in advance for this complement. Great job, anyway! Regards.
@FPVTeamLegit3 ай бұрын
I believe that is to manually constrain the shutter speed to a specific duration such as 1/60th, but I'm not 100% sure on that.
@thenightvisionlab3 ай бұрын
@@FPVTeamLegit , thank you for your reply.... I am curious to know, if it is the case, if it would be possible to constrain the shutter speed at another rate, like for instance 1/25th.... Just thought for food...
@MichaelJWolf-ku3kv4 ай бұрын
Have always loved your instructional vids. They’re the only reason I was able to successfully build my first fpv wing, a Team Legit 5D, about 5 years ago. I just ordered the 5D2 kit with the high output power system from your website and I ordered this carbon rod kit as well. I ordered the medium kit but now I’m thinking I should have gotten the large kit for the 5D2. Do you think the medium will hold up ok with this plane?
@FPVTeamLegit3 ай бұрын
Hey Michael--Yup, a Large kit would work great on the 5D2, but we actually already include one with each 5D2 kit! Thanks for asking!
@capnhardway5 ай бұрын
Cuz it's a stealth plane dodged its own signal!😂
@offaxisfpv7 ай бұрын
great walk through. THANK YOU!!!
@johnmoser11627 ай бұрын
What do pilots do before taking off ... may be next time, follow a checklist.
@6rusT7 ай бұрын
Nice video, just bought the RH-55 from your site to use it in the runcam thumb.... what lens can I get with ir filtering for the night eagle? is this camera 1000TVL or 1500TVL ? in the official runcam site it says 1500 but in some places it says 1000
@FPVTeamLegit6 ай бұрын
Any "M12" size lens will mount to the Night Eagle 3 for you to experiment with. The TVL of the camera sensor I am not 100% sure on. Regardless, remember that analog broadcast is only ~720 horizontal lines, so the camera will over-sample for broadcast regardless.
@Nexalian_Gamer7 ай бұрын
Although most people would complain about the pink effect during daytime, I think it looks cool as hell and could be used to film vaporwave-style footage. Also the crappy video feed at 7:29 is PERFECT for achieving the VHS effect without using filter editing software
@jfreedner8 ай бұрын
Have a signal repeater on the mother ship.
@renzus12348 ай бұрын
i had lot of fun watching that whole video , good Job! Check out my rocket plane! Unfortunately in Europe we can not buy rockets that strong
@eddyinukraine9 ай бұрын
Any suggestions for an IR block lens?
@FPVTeamLegit9 ай бұрын
Hey Eddy--Any of the Phoenix lenses will work well as an IR-Blocked Night Eagle 3 Lens: team-legit.com/search.asp?keyword=phoenix+lens&search=
@iguanapete38099 ай бұрын
ZZZZZZZZ
@gregmead29679 ай бұрын
I don't understand why it was necessary to mount the rocket plane upside down. Since the plane was dropped before firing the rocket, there wouldn't be a problem with the vertical tail fins hitting the carrier plane upon release, and you wouldn't have to worry about an upside down video feed, nor interference between the antenna and the wings.
@FPVTeamLegit9 ай бұрын
We wanted the two CG's to line up to keep the carrier's handling consistent. Right-side-up, the Funjet's tails intersect the carrier's wing when the CG's are matched.
@gregmead29679 ай бұрын
@@FPVTeamLegitThanks for your reply. That makes sense, but I keep thinking there must have been an easier way that wouldn't have resulted in carbon fiber interference. Ah, well, you guys are the ones making it.
@trash_in_a_box9 ай бұрын
Very poor antenna placement and orientation, especially with the decision to use carbon fiber, since it attenuates RF signals. Antennas were oriented such that the nulls were pointing toward your base station at higher altitudes pre separation. The only way to have gotten a strong signal out of the setup is if you were flying directly toward or away from the base station, which at the drop altitude and location would have meant flying straight up or straight down. Google "radiation pattern dipole" to get an idea of where the signal will be strongest and weakest, but my recommendation would be to go back to fiberglass and orient the antennas 90 degrees from each other with one pointing straight up (assuming you are going to drop from directly above the base station again). And as someone else mentioned, ensure that the TX and RX antennas have close to the same polarization. You want to point the broad side of the receiver antenna toward the craft and as close to parallel to the TX antenna as you can for the strongest signal. Hope this helps. Cool project and good luck on the next attempt.
@FPVTeamLegit9 ай бұрын
Thanks! #3 is returning to Fiberglass.
@scottyh729 ай бұрын
Linkage geo is wrong. Low on the servo, high on the control surface for a wing. Use 222 threadlocker instead of blue. Does the same thing, yet you can remove it with hand tools.
@FPVTeamLegit9 ай бұрын
The "pink stuff" mild thread locker is a great choice too. More guys have blue laying around than pink so that's why we recommend the blue. Anything but Red! Re: geometry... pros and cons. 1:1 gives you less leverage than Surface-High/Servo-Low, but also keeps response more linear which is why we recommend it as a starting point.
@scottyh729 ай бұрын
@FPVTeamLegit No tailless aircraft I have ever flown can use a 1:1 linkage ratio without severely limiting servo travel and resolution. 3d aircraft uses 1:1 for sure, but you have a wing in the video. Hence my original comment.
@ingmarm88589 ай бұрын
Rubbish video feed even line of sight should have triggered an aborted launch or low level recoverable launch shouldn't it?
@BigDickMark9 ай бұрын
Fun project! Where do you guys launch/fly?
@AntonMoquin-vg1sy9 ай бұрын
Actual plane drop @ 4:36
@CactusJackSlade9 ай бұрын
"Split" V-tail.... nice adaptation! :-)
@nonamelo55559 ай бұрын
Guy has a voice of Elon Musk XD
@eebydeeby694209 ай бұрын
we used to do this in middle school. im not sure how things keep going wrong
@tombusby23339 ай бұрын
Just buy a dji03 camera
@nicklachen50609 ай бұрын
looks like it went to 150km/h if the mothership was ~50km/hr just eyeballing. Wow!
@BarrettCharlebois9 ай бұрын
This is SOOOOO COOOOLLLL
@rob379lqz9 ай бұрын
Seriously! You seriously posted a 7 minute of useless vid for us nose and mouth breathers! I’ll take my meagre ever-counting-down 7 minutes of life elsewhere.
@donniewoodley86049 ай бұрын
Should use Kevlar next time.
@relentlessmadman9 ай бұрын
rocket jet comon man make up yer mind is it a rocket or a jet? or doesit have two types o f engines? I see propellers and what looks like a rocket tube! Looks like you just dropped a BOMB!
@uuzd4s9 ай бұрын
I've flown my 40 sized R/C aerobatic well past the point of visual orientation many times just for testing new antennas, receivers or just for fun to test my ability to determine it's orientation. As I got better at it, I'd climb until I couldn't see it or I ran out of fuel, just to glide it in. A max altitude recording altimeter showed me at over 1500ft one flight which was the point of loosing sight altogether of the A/C. Most of these altitude tests were 1200-1300ft in altitude. You could always see if the wings were level and to determine if it was upright, just push the elevator, if it dives, you're upright, if it climbs, you're inverted. You could see the wings disappear, then reappear as you rolled over to level flight. The fun part was to kill the motor and glide back to the field. You could stretch that to ten minutes if you wanted, but a last-minute dive from around 500ft and energy management to a landing at my feet was my "show off" signature move. All this was practiced on a relatively inexpensive model, giving much more confidence for flying my large scale A/C. If I were doing what you're attempting w/ a dropped Rocket powered A/C, I'd practice some high altitude flying on something less expensive first.
@keenankoch26009 ай бұрын
Thank you guy for being an awesome local shop!
@thomgt49 ай бұрын
Carbon fiber isn't just conductive (not copper conductive though) which has a shielding effect (like a poor faraday cage). It's behavior at different frequencies is very interesting as well. It has a decently high permittivity at the frequency of your video transmitter, leading to an absorbing effect. Some of your video feed wireless power is absorbed in the airframe and turned into heat, meaning less signal. CF in an airframe like this will continue to be trouble for your control/video signals. You should have less interference at lower frequencies if you stick with it, so you could go to 433MHz
@tomduke5589 ай бұрын
video game play irl.. the scene reminds me of Lost...
@FPVTeamLegit9 ай бұрын
Portions of Lost were filmed in this valley!
@tomduke5589 ай бұрын
ig so no wonder, a scenic spot worthy a whole TV series itself indeed@@FPVTeamLegit
@rtlongthegeek9 ай бұрын
I'm new here, but I wonder about adding a deployable parachute for moments like this when there's no hope of recovery. Seems like it might prevent total loss?
@nooneyouknow93999 ай бұрын
CF is very conducive so proper antenna and placement are very important.
@googleyoutubechannel85549 ай бұрын
Yep, you dropped it, good job.
@ryanellis43839 ай бұрын
As someone who has done rocket-planes in the past, I feel your pain.
@ChristopherF_19719 ай бұрын
Just do it. Way to many p’s and q’s
@sirukin78499 ай бұрын
It might make sense to setup your FPV aircraft on the ground and do a walkout video test. Every 50 ft, check your video signal with a clear line of sight to your VTX. If the carbon fibre blocks or interferes with RF as the folks here in the comments claim, it would have immediately popped up as being an issue to address. External antenna, higher gain, etc.
@FPVTeamLegit9 ай бұрын
Next time!
@stuwest36539 ай бұрын
What size rocket motor?
@iforce2d9 ай бұрын
Looks like the payload had an autopilot, was it just not used? I mean when you have zero video, what's the harm in trying... The carrier looks slow enough to catch by hand. Those funjets are good for high speed out of the box, even glass seems unnecessary let alone carbon. Just fly it stock, don't fix what ain't broke and the video would probably have been fine.
@opieshomeshop9 ай бұрын
*_I think what happened was, chinesium. Start using quality american made eqpt._*
@fsbollox9 ай бұрын
Very nice design whatb flight controller do you use ?
@50buttfish9 ай бұрын
El Mirage Lakebed and test area.
@martin090919899 ай бұрын
Carbon sucks on RC Planes! I recommend kevlar as a cover material, and carbon just for spars and very small crossections, where the greater stiffnes of carbon starts to make sense and dosn´t block the radio. I have an competition DLC made of carbon with a kevlar canopy, and i hate that thing!!! (although it is a very high-performance glider) When you just fly level in thermals everything is fine, but when you do acrobatics the radio cuts out....🤮 So the damm thing hangs on my wall and i fly my selfmade foamcore- paper- composit- wing on a stick DLC. 😆
@vitale66339 ай бұрын
This is an excellent control rod instructional video. Lots of great tips and tricks, including personal safety.