Compro 20 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2iКүн бұрын
Compro 400 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2iКүн бұрын
Compro 100 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2iКүн бұрын
Compro 80 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2iКүн бұрын
Compro 200.000 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@RogerRoving2 күн бұрын
"Shipyard" is one word, in conventional English!
@user-ey8df9ss2i3 күн бұрын
Compro 40 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i3 күн бұрын
Compro 10 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i3 күн бұрын
Compro 5 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i3 күн бұрын
Compro 50 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro niteroi Brasil
@martinedwards73607 күн бұрын
You sound drunk, slurred commentary 😂
@user-nc3pt7zc3c16 күн бұрын
My 1st Ship was USS Radford DD-446, Homeport Pearl Harbor. Signalman SM2 L. Garcia USN.
@AlanTalbott-be7gt18 күн бұрын
I was stationed on the USS Franklin D Rosevelt from 1972 to 1976. During that time, we made two Med cruses. The Allen M Sumner DD692 was one of our escort ships. I remember refueling with her alongside the Pawcatuck (AO 108) fleet oiler at the same time. I remember as we refueled how steady the Rosevelt traveled through the water while the Sumner bounced up and down while riding the waves. That big 692 hull number sticks in my mind as if it were yesterday. I also got to ride the Pawcatuck for 2 days in the Med while being transported back to the Rosevelt. Lots of good memories.
@user-ey8df9ss2i20 күн бұрын
Compro 200 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i20 күн бұрын
Compro 50 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i20 күн бұрын
Compro 200 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
@neilturner686521 күн бұрын
All 4 ships are a pile of 💩 The MOD wanted 4 tankers and they got 4 Tankers. They are a shambles. Cheap and not even cheerful.. 😮 they look great but are badly built. Vibrating funnels means cabins are condemned due to noise pollution.😮😮
@Train11523 күн бұрын
2:00, that is a photo of USNS Hiddensee. RIP the USNS Hiddensee.
@alanbrown917827 күн бұрын
They weren't "the last ships fitted with steam propulsion". Hms Ariadne, the last Leander class frigate was commissioned in 1973, 7 years after Intrepid was commissioned. Also, nuclear submarines continue to be built with steam propulsion.
@user-ey8df9ss2i28 күн бұрын
Compro 20.000 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i28 күн бұрын
Compro 30 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i28 күн бұрын
Compro 20 porta aviões para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
@user-ey8df9ss2i28 күн бұрын
Compro 20 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
@stephennelmes4557Ай бұрын
As an AB ( R ), on Arethusa 79 - 82 i worked with the PO ( Gunner ) in the ops room on the Seacat system, and i can honestly say it was shit. Should have been an ASW weapon. Complete embarrassment.
@CaptainSeatoАй бұрын
You forgot one. pokerface.jpg
@estebanenrique5777Ай бұрын
It will simply never happen and this project is just a fantasy. Russia itself knows that it is unable to produce a destroyer, so it simply concentrates on building smaller ships, which translates into building many corvettes.
@jabba7746Ай бұрын
As tragic as her loss and the loss of life was I fear had Hood survived the war she would have only suffered the same fate as Warspite and the other BB's of the fleet in one of the scrap yards.
@05017351Ай бұрын
Where is brief No: 16? Cant find it on the channel or by searching. Any ideas, or is it gone?
@seansean9675Ай бұрын
1. 12,120 tons of ship 2. 520 foot length, 160m 3. 24m beam 4. draft 6.4 5. last steam ships were the leander class frigates. commissioned hms ariadne 10th feb 1973 6. speed 21 knots 7. LPD, landing platform dock, well decks are from the age of sailing ships 8. LST's, landing ship tanks, a whole different kind of ship 9. 978 radar operates in the X band 10. 262 radar is a fire control radar for the seacat missle system. removed in 1985 11. bofors were removed in 1985, replaced with 20mm bmarc 12. four seacat launchers not five 13. hms fearless was scrapped in belgium 14 an attempt was made to have intrepid preserved as a museum ship still afloat. basic fact checking needed
@airbrakerАй бұрын
Only ever saw it something once. Most of the time it would dive straight into the water with the wings flying back onto the ship. Or it would go ballistic forcing us to turn hard to avoid it falling. One just sat on the launcher burning setting the launcher on fire. Everyone knew it was crap more faith going to the 20mm. The only time I saw it work it was in manual manual mode in the hands of a skilled gunner who hit a slow moving "sitting duck" towed target.
@tedheath9018Ай бұрын
Thumbs down info verbatim from wiki, pronunciation must be a piss take.
@graff324Ай бұрын
My father served on the USS Irwin DD794 during the Korean war
@timwingham8952Ай бұрын
There was an acknowledged failure of RN's anti aircraft capability that only came to light during the Falklands war. Doctrine had been directed towards guided missiles as the (almost) sole defence against aircraft. Gun armament was not seen as the future. Seacat was envisaged as the replacement for the Bofors 40mm gun, with the only type of small calibre deck mounted guns planned to remain being the token Oerlikon 20mm. The RN's line of sight Seacat, near useless Seaslug, as well as the more advanced Seadart and Seawolf missiles were all in use during the Falklands war, as were their Oerlikon guns and the RAF' Regiment's Rapier missiles, but attacking Argentine aircraft still managed to penetrate the task force's defences. The relative failure of anti aircraft capability has been ascribed to two basic issues; The first was that the Navy's missile systems had all been developed to engage only one perceived threat - that of Warsaw Pact aircraft on the open seas. Defending ships anchored close in to rugged hilly coastlines (as found in the Falklands) was not a scenario ever thought likely. All RN's missile systems struggled with the situation, with some being lauched "unguided". The second was the lack of a layered defence systems integrating both missiles and guns. Almost all defence eggs were in one basket - namely missiles. The absence of enough closer range automatic gun armament was painfully evident. These days such lessons have been learned , with much improved missile capabilty and close in (gun) weapon systems such as the potent Goalkeeper and Phalanx guns being part of layered missile/gun ship defences, which still includes last ditch 20mm and 30mm automatic weapons. Let's hope we never have to put such defences to the test again. RIP all those lost in the Falklands conflict, and we must always remember those both killed and injured.
@jeffreyhall2136Ай бұрын
It's a tragety, these ships are not being replaced.
@maxplanck9055Ай бұрын
This ship was sailing in a combat zone with no weapons or decoy equipment, you can see why it was sunk, beaurocratic cost cutting sending ships underpowered?✌️❤️🇬🇧
@stevecosciaАй бұрын
Informative video. Thanks for the details.
@JohnnySmithWhite-wd4eyАй бұрын
When the President used to be Asistant Secretary of the Navy and says build battle cruisers....you say Yes sir.
@whynot649282 ай бұрын
wow thanks for a full history of MV Atlantic Conveyor in battle. most things i have seen and read only give a paragraph to th eloss and it's affects and i remember that the Coventry loss dominated the news at the time
@Mogadeet2 ай бұрын
Those ships were Battlecruisers. They fit the bill perfectly. Frankly, I'm still dismayed that such useful ships were junked so far.
@dombenedetto77452 ай бұрын
Sou do Brasil e servi no depto de máquinas do CT Paraná, D29, ex- USS Cushing. Um abraço a todos.
@GaryMeyer-o8f2 ай бұрын
My father was on USS Hall fire control w/ Seven battle stars This was a great video.
@teddy27382 ай бұрын
La Armada de Chile contó con 2 unidades a partir de finales de 1974 de la clase Allen M. Sumner Mod. Fueron el DD 697 Charles S. Sperry y el DD 779 Douglas H. Fox ... sirvieron en la Armada Chilena hasta principios y fines de 1990 con los nombres de DD 16 Ministro Zenteno y DD 17 Ministro Portales respectivamente ( eran buques muy nobles y " duros de matar " 😲 prueba de ello fue el hundimiento del DD 17 Ministro Portales en 1998 con cañonazos de otros buques de la Escuadra , bombas de aviación y finalmente fue dinamitado para que se hundiera de una buena vez : Hay un video circulando en internet sobre el Hundimiento del PORTALES el 11 de Noviembre de 1998😢
@rharvey7512 ай бұрын
Your pronunciation is abominable. That comes from someone who serve on three of these ships
@Hascienda272 ай бұрын
Did this ship actually ever visit Liverpool ? Because it's beginning to turn into an absolute myth
@almac25982 ай бұрын
I served on Antelope '79, '80, '81 (Dec). Don't remember going to the far east! Went to the Windies in 81.
@jameswallace77092 ай бұрын
First RAS was with Sutherland not QE
@fthrjckАй бұрын
Yup i was there
@jameswallace7709Ай бұрын
@@fthrjck were you on the side playing gnangyang style (however its spealt)