16 сағат бұрын
Пікірлер
@tommyrjensen Сағат бұрын
Have they got EMAS at that runway end?
@thecoolnessification 2 сағат бұрын
Why is it that some planes glide down like this and you see others straight nose dive like a heavy ball being dropped when they lose power? Also doesnt all control services stop working once the hydralics have no power from the engine anymore? How do the wheels drop with no power? People say 747's can glide for 60 miles it seems like they would fall faster than a cessna due to the much heavier weight ...
@captainchaos3667 3 сағат бұрын
So what happened; in theory even without flaps they still should have been able to stop on the runway?
@ShadowRap-y5l 4 сағат бұрын
How come they not dump some fuel before landing? Knowing that the slats were not working and coming in at higher speeds with still a fair bit of fuel onboard.
@consortiumxf 5 сағат бұрын
True story: A train dispatcher (aka 'train traffic controller') missed an incorrect read-back from a train, which turned into a collision course with 2 trains, killing all 4 people on board (2 on each train). Just putting that out there.
@tweedius 5 сағат бұрын
Last thing you hear is "Ok runway 8" and then in the next frame, "The aircraft was finally vectored for runway 7R."
@VASAviation 4 сағат бұрын
Indeed
@Xanthopteryx 6 сағат бұрын
"We're stopping on the runway, Cargojet 2387. Stopping on the runway." No, you are not. =) Thankfully everything worked out as it should. That is why you have a soft long clear path after the runway so in case of this happening, it will mainly be material damage and not any damage to the passengers. And the plane did well too. Collapsed in a normal, as designed way, and engines held up nicely too. And no fire. No nothing really. In the end, this is ONLY hard dead things and money. Nothing more. The system worked!
@ds78613 6 сағат бұрын
This is yet another example of how ridiculous these VIP TFRs are. Aside from the near-comical issues some of the CAPs have had intercepting slow-moving planes like Cessnas, these GA flights that are following ATC directions aren't the risk and ones that aren't are part of the reason there's CAP accompanying the VIP. It's other things at supersonic speeds and/or flying below radar level that are the real potential risk...the sorts of things that all of the TFRs and CAP in the world aren't going to do anything to stop. How much fuel was wasted by this pilot to hold as long as he did? Especially with all of the push for SAF, making flying more efficient, and reducing flying to reduce climate change, what is the collective impact of all of these TFRs.
@epapa737 7 сағат бұрын
San Francisco is allergic to decent controlling
@HikingBob 7 сағат бұрын
It seems that the only thing that could make flying in and out of SFO any worse is if Aerosucre flew there.
@collectorguy3919 9 сағат бұрын
"Normalization of deviance" will be one phrase in NTSB's report after two aircraft crunch into each other on approach to SFO.
@runninrebel1520 10 сағат бұрын
They were fatten
@TrevorVanDerLinden 10 сағат бұрын
It is said "things happen in threes". What will the third flap/slat issue be?
@DomManInT1 11 сағат бұрын
Southwest 2196, you are clogging up my airspace and you are now declared as an emergency.
@carolynmacdonald8047 12 сағат бұрын
Question- when a plane has a problem- or declares an emergency- do other pilots just shut up- or are they moved to another channel… ty
@andreweddie8211 9 сағат бұрын
Depends on the emergency. Usually everyone just keeps it short and sweet. If it’s serious enough and going to be over some time like talking down someone with nav issues in bad weather, they’ll end up being on their own frequency.
@tzahner 12 сағат бұрын
At 4:59: “we should be able to come back in this lap”
@hotrodray6802 12 сағат бұрын
Gave he a headache just watching. Piloting is not as stressful.
@UtahJohn777 12 сағат бұрын
Look at the FOD on top of the wings.
@xAIIen 12 сағат бұрын
One day, TCAS is going to fail, and shit is going to hit the fan.
@Glideslopes 12 сағат бұрын
Not the best look.
@theEagleBeagle 12 сағат бұрын
I guess diverting to another airport with a long runway wasn't available. They did a good enough job though, plane will probably fly again one day.
@Dyson_Cyberdynesystems 13 сағат бұрын
Aviate! If you have visual contact, do some of that pilot sh*t, and avoid the other plane. Continue. It irritates me to no end that Navy pilots can land a whole carrier airwing without saying a word on the radio but we stuggle with basic VFR approaches like this.
@mark- 13 сағат бұрын
are you going to call an emergency or would you like me to declare it for you ? ?
@MrYoungkimba 14 сағат бұрын
Holy shit! That’s so boss!
@AppEal-y6y 14 сағат бұрын
THAT WAS ME WHO ORDERED THE RICE COOKER!!!! IS IT THE SUN Q420 SERIES??? I NEED THAT PACKAGE SO I CAN MAKE SUPPER IN TIME FOR MY FAMILIES CHRISTMAS DINNER!!! WILL I GET IT BEFORE CHRISTMAS OR IS IT DAMAGED???? I NEED IT NOW EVEN IF IT IS PARTIALLY DAMAGED BECAUSE I HAVE A LARGE FAMILY TO FEED SINCE I HAVE 500 FAMILY MEMBERS COMING OVER SINCE I HAD CHILDREN WITH A WHOLE TONE OF WOMEN OVER THE LAST 25 YEARS SINCE I WAS VERY YOUNG!!! I AM WILLING TO INVITE THE PILOTS OVER TO MY MANSION IN WEST VANCOUVER UP IN MY MOUNTAIN HOUSE ACCESSIBLE VIA HELICOPTER IF THEY CAN GIVE ME MY PACKAGE ON TIME!!! JUST JOKING THIS IS AN IMAX SCRIPT FOR MY NEXT MOVIE
@imbowser 15 сағат бұрын
why is there no standard for reporting fuel in pounds and souls when declaring an emergency
@DavidMcCoyII 15 сағат бұрын
Clear to land 22, traffic holding 31? Clear to land 31 😳🤯☠️
@craig7350 15 сағат бұрын
Always, always, always an issue with fuel. He asked for time remaining, he got it in minutes, but then, he asked for it in pounds.
@ickipoo 14 сағат бұрын
ATC want to know how long they can stay in the air, fire crew want to know how much fuel they're dealing with if there is a fie. Conversion is not necessarily trivial.
@dermann439 13 сағат бұрын
@@ickipoofuel in minutes is quite important because you don't want them to run out of fuel while dealing with checklists but I really don't get that stupid pound amount. If it burns it burns. And rescue crews should be able to figure how much fuel they'll burn approximately when calculating how long they are in the air.
@Dirk3672_StupidYT 16 сағат бұрын
How about ATC get a conversion widget that translates minutes of engines still turning to pounds of fuel? Over and over again they have to nag about fuel remaining in pounds. Unload the cockpit!
@ickipoo 14 сағат бұрын
Conversion requires knowledge of the configuration of the plane.
@danbarnard9785 7 сағат бұрын
Not all engines burn at the same rate. Not all airframes have the same engines (PW, GE or RR for example). Thrust settings also change fuel burn. Would be more questions asked if it was a conversion of x time to y pounds/kilos. ATC wants to know how long they can issue delay vectors so crew can work the issue (and how quickly to move traffic out of the way), ARFF wants to know how much fuel to expect should things go wrong. In the grand scheme of things, time is more important than pounds since if something ignites you'll be fighting the fire regardless. ARFF just needs to know how much equipment to bring should a fire start on landing (in case of another emergency, you don't want to dispatch ALL your resources to one unless absolutely necessary...which you can always bring more later if needed).
@nrakma 16 сағат бұрын
I heard that the new 738 is equipped with two new secret systems, not available on the 737.
@VASAviation 15 сағат бұрын
The new 738? What version is the "new" 738?
@xjcrossx 16 сағат бұрын
It's still amazes me in such a high-paced environment in radio calls coming in and out within seconds, that it is still possible that Communications are blocked
@wilsonpickett3881 16 сағат бұрын
wow
@JASONCIRONE-kp4xr 16 сағат бұрын
just glad this wasnt over my house i live 15 mins away in between both airports
@Frankie2751 17 сағат бұрын
The funny part is he makes the call when he is a couple miles from the airport and communicate with the guy when he’s flying over the airport and getting ready to enter the downwind for 29. But afterwards he doesn’t report when he’s turning base and he doesn’t report when he’s on final for 29. Just goes to show he made an immediate U-turn to try to land before the IFR pilot.
@shutupnumnuts 17 сағат бұрын
SKW3841 has a very beautiful voice, just saying
@hyb180 17 сағат бұрын
And why not divert to an airport with longer runway…JFK, EWR?!
@lisanadinebaker5179 17 сағат бұрын
Considering what has been going on at EWR lately, I would go anywhere else but there
@Slippindisc 17 сағат бұрын
she's obnoxious
@bobwilson758 18 сағат бұрын
Good controller calling that this heading is the base portion of the approach ! I like heads up info like that type ! Helps situational awareness , a lot .
@skycop56 18 сағат бұрын
Clear communication always seems to be a problem during these incidents. “Say again” over and over
@hendrikharryg 18 сағат бұрын
Wrong landing clearance and no prompt about it? Yikies!
@bobwilson758 18 сағат бұрын
Non - staggered approach seems rather dangerous - Very professional pilots ! Damn - sketchy ?
@sirxavier4727 18 сағат бұрын
Where is the crash and fire, or was this just a clickbait, because they landed just fine, 7000ft runway is nothing for SWA when most of their hubs have runways less than 6000ft their performance calculations is one of the best in the industry. I am going to go to an airport where company have operation on the ground if the calculations say others then there is EWR/JFK.
@VASAviation 17 сағат бұрын
Didn't you see the quotes "" ??
@daveh5204 15 сағат бұрын
BUR comes to mind…
@HikingBob 7 сағат бұрын
They clearly asked for "Crash-Fire-Rescue" which what the airport fire department was referred to before it was changed (a long time ago) to ARFF (Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting). Pilot must be pretty old-school to still call it Crash Fire Rescue
@disellin4871 18 сағат бұрын
The tower needs to get his ears checked. The pilot had to repeatedly tell him it was a slats problem.
@disellin4871 18 сағат бұрын
A Boeing with a slats problem? Why is this not surprising!
@troyfly71 18 сағат бұрын
Would have went to JFK with flap issues and 180kts. Sure the landing data says it will work but float a little and you will eat up runway quickly. Then if you go off the end of 31 you are in the water.
@jamessayre865 10 сағат бұрын
If you float beyond what the data says you are good for then you go around and try again… as is with EVERY landing. What’s the beef if the runways long enough?
@troyfly71 10 сағат бұрын
You mean go around like Swa did awhile back when they almost hit the tower? When the tower told them to go around. Sometimes things don’t work out quite as planned. A 14511 runway is a couple of minutes away at JFK. The 767 at YVR thought they had enough runway and went 1800’ off the end. I’ll take a little inconvenience to increase the safety of a non routine flight.
@7_of_9 18 сағат бұрын
What's up with multiple Boeing planes with flap failures this week 💀
@sirxavier4727 18 сағат бұрын
Really, com on menn, that's because Airbus planes are awesome they don't suffer from flaps Slats bird strike stall engines and all the other stuff that 10 year old Boeing 738 suffers especially not needing mechanics to maintain these bird or maybe journalists and the media just don't care much to report them
@lisanadinebaker5179 17 сағат бұрын
All the Boeing planes got together around the water cooler in the hanger and made this their failure mode pick of the week.
@stevenverhaegen8729 19 сағат бұрын
You sure they said flaps? 😄
@earlgreystoke3324 19 сағат бұрын
"Slat issue..."
@tomaswarner9443 19 сағат бұрын
Should be fired and find a new career in something with as low competence as his own
@YouveBeenMiddled 19 сағат бұрын
Boys, if you've got an issue and you're asking for special handling just call the emergency already. Most declared emergencies also land successfully.
@GWNorth-db8vn 15 сағат бұрын
"Or would you like me to declare it for you?" settled the issue. I wonder if their reluctance is about paperwork or they're just being cowboys.