Klipsch brighter as all Klipsch speakers

Same audio clips should be side by side on the different speakers to properly compare! They are not which makes this comparison useless

BMW time travelling win 🏆

Much prefer the 12.2 here, I shouldn’t given the price difference or maybe system match is the problem but the 12.2s are showing a lot more music here…the others sound veiled in comparison…too restrained…?

Bad microphone/recording, neither sounds good in my PC (Klipsch RP-600M II / Audiolap 6000A amplifier)

antes de que se quitase la pantalla blanca, opte por el B, pues era el SONY, vaya grata sorpresa

Отлично сделан тест: трек, не прекращаясь переходит на др колонку, что даёт прямое сравнение без потерь, чего нет в др тестах. И жанры разные. Молодцы, ставлю 👍.

"Audiophile" wannabes just can't understand why a $150.00 receiver sounds as good or even better a more expensive amplifier. Get over it, let it go!.

B&W simply beating polk R200 , but price 😮, so the R200 is worth for price.

Both are performing almost equally balanced sound. E 20 is little worthy 😮

Both are nice for played all music. E 20 is very bright and Elac sounds like orijinal orchestral feel.

6000A.

Revel

They both sound good in their own. The Klipsh is more "V" shape sound EQ, with more predominat sound in bass and highs, and the Evo's gives you a more full range EQ, and you can hear the guitars with those solos right in your face. For my taste I would pick the Evos, and If I want a scooped mid sound, I just EQ the sound.

This is a deserved draw! The KEF R3 makes an excellent presentation with both brands. If they ask for a tiebreaker, the winner would be the Rega Brio for its impeccable bass dynamics. You can't go wrong. Thank you ❤

I hear more weight and tonal balance, more true to reality in Rega Brio. Cambridge audio I hear it out of time, something artificial. Here I win Rega Brio. Thank you ❤

If we place Audiolab VS Parasound on a scale. Which one sounds better with KEF speakers? Thanks ❤

I am going to say right off the bat, I am a Klipsch guy. This is going back to the 90's when a friend of mine blew me away with his Forte II speakers. Since then, I was hooked on Klipsch. I have had several speakers outside of their heritage line since, and was mostly happy with them. Recently, I had bought the RP-600m's due to their rave review, but when I got them, I had noticed that they are more subdued from the Klipsch speakers I had from the past. More so, I had discovered that the RP-600m's have a VERY scooped out midrange. I still kept them because the highs are still better than on some other speakers that I have tested, and the bass is incredible for a speaker of it's size. Now, I am looking for a small speaker with a 4" woofer for my computer system. I do have a subwoofer for this system, so the speakers don't have to perform well in the low end. I did start off with Klipsch, but I found out that a horn loaded, or waveguide, tweeter would be too forward given the near field placement. So I had been comparing other speakers in the $300 and below price range that have a small footprint and a 4" woofer. The Micca RB-42, the MB-42x came up and so did the Elac BS41. On paper and reviews, a clear winner was coming forth and it was the RSL CG3m's. I bought those and tried them out, but found that the midbass had a bad peak at 350hz. I had to bring down the 250hz and 500hz controls over 4db each to mitigate the bonk. I thought something must be up, but in the end, it was the speakers. I returned those and, once again, began my search. A similar speaker to the RSL, the PSB P3 had come up that was just slightly more expensive than the CG3m's. This speaker seemed to fair well in many comparisons, but I have to say, when compared to a Klipsch speaker, I am surprised at HOW MUCH it has come out ahead. I am currently listening to comparisons with a system that has a pair of Sony SSCS5's on my desktop. While these sound great, the problem is that they are too big for a desktop application. Soo, in lieu of this final demonstration, I think the deal is sealed. ....Yeah, it is is. I just went on Amazon and ordered a pair of the PSB P3's. I will give them a shot and see if they are better than the RSL's I tried out.

C>b>d>a

Draw

Horrible music to test these speakers.

Hi are both amp Hi-Fi. It’s not specified in the 328 model. Thanks!

All are either dull, sharp or have so much mid that I can't handle them. What the hell do I do now? I'm sticking with my Tannoy Gold 8's. Just killer flat representation and articulate AND warm when you need them to be. I will say the KEF in this video are all missing pronounced cymbals and some of the pings in the music are just flat out missing. The monitor audio have it all but way to much mid and top in your face.The Klipsch are the worst in this video which is odd because the Q150 have always sounded muted with to much cabinet resonance. And again the Q150, 350 and LS50 here have mid-range overtaking the bass and highs. So i guess I would pick the Monitor audio as second to Tannoy powered Gold 8's. On top of that I have lost track of which mic you are using to record these videos. So that changes the room and the room changes the transfer of sound. So these videos are just fun as apposed to actually hearing the speakers in room. Thanks for the videos I enjoy them all just the same.

If you compare a speaker using music will this usually translate into movies too? If one speaker sounds better listening to music does that mean it will also sound better than the other one with movies? And does anyone have any experience with the ELAC and Klipsch center channels? I also compared these two speakers and was only able to do a good test using music. And the to me the ELAC won. But I was told this doesn’t mean it will sound better with movies. I was also told that Klipsch centers are better than the ELAC centers. And advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks!!

I also have the Wharfedale Denton 80th speakers paired with the SONY STRDH 190 and the sound is fantastic!!!

I guess I now see why I like the NAD with my particular speakers. They are high efficiency more or less single driver (with a tweeter that comes in very very high). The bass punch of the NAD helps to add fullness at the bottom and I get a room filling sound. Ideally I would like the vocal presentation of the AL with the overall balance of performance of the NAD. But if I had different speakers I probably would not choose the NAD over the AL. Fascinating.

B6.2 every time. Ears of independence matter. Do you like it. That is all that matters unless you are staging in a studio to mix down components. I dig it.

What is the right crossover frequenz for the r200? I use a rel t7i subwoofer. 80 hz or higher?

сони свыливает все в кашу. жбл чище и разборчивее

it needs a comparison of same phrase... more precise..

Both are the best sound !!!

Yamaha is the winner, this time !

Denon is the winner, this time !

Denon is the King !

Yamaha is the winner, here !

Yamaha is the King !

Yamaha is the incontestable winner !

For me, Sony is the winner !

Both have an almost identical sound, but at the Sony is a bit warmer and the Yamaha is a bit more detailed, but the differences are absolutely small !

R-S202 is the king, here ! He's sound is great !!!

So many factors will change the sound, ie speakers, room,music, instruments, etc! Just get wut has the features you need, or the look you like, or price...THAT'S ALL! Don't worry about the "tone" this or "openess" that, etc...your ears will like ANY of these amps!

KZbin compression! No way to accurately compare this way!

Oberons fatigued me especially with jazz.

I'm listening to this in 3050i, so I'm not working on a test. Btw sounds amazing

ES 20 bright without being sharp on the ear

heavy metal sounds shit on anything. And thats not even heavy. poor production just a flash of clashing noise

Great vid. Polk warm but very clear through mid high and low without being too sharp on the highs

classical 6.2 sharp

the 6.2s are a lot muddier with separation on this comparison

My A130 have two quality levels depending on how they are connected at the posts and likely by design. I'm running mine with polarity swapped. My suggestion is to at least try it. My experience has been that this loudspeaker exhibits a distortion in one of two phase orientations. Making the swap resulted in better vocal presence, better texture, uncolored mid bass.