What i hear here. Dbr62 has a liitle more deepness and stage. And this effects cant be notixed by me in all songs, so there is very few. But dbr62 already twice a cost of 6.2,so you think twice,if you need them. 6.2 is way more than enough for fun)) .imao.

Damn for the price. You just can’t beat Sony

Kefs is a bit bass heavy, which muddies the mids and highs. The Elacs are too sweet in the highs and the bass underwhelming. The kef Q150 is actually better than the Q350. Especially if you had a decent smaller driver say 8-inch woofer.

Boys help!! Need advise Kef 150 with Zen dac ifi V2(after all settings done) and Yamaha a-s201 Vs your set up kef150 and 301

yamaha leggermente meglio

I like those!!

This is not a good quality upload. Not even on Tidal. But there sounds better.

A and B are too bright for me. B being weakest out of the bunch overall. I felt like the highs on A could also be fatiguing in the long run. C is solid, if not constrained -- maybe a touch too much base? The Meta's were clearly the most spacious to my ears. Going into this I would've bet I would prefer the 4.2's but nope, the Metas. Thanks for this.

I might be missing the point of these videos. You can’t really judge the difference through a secondary speaker?

Kissing Candice is not death metal 😂

100us difencia, calidad precio XT15, los tengo puestos en stereo con un Fosi V3 + P1 en un dormitorio y suena bastante bien, de hecho le tengo que bajar los graves un poco ya que para una habitacion de 3 x 4m esta de sobra. Creo que por 300us o un poquito mas hay mejores que el XT20

I have x1700 but leak dynamics a lot...

Μ 16 ,1400 euros !!!

oh, I also owned yamaha s501. I would get s501 also over the c328 which is still more money then the 501 as well.

I owned the yamaha s801, Nad 316 and Nad c328. Book shelf speakers are hungry for power. If you have very efficient speakers go nad. If you need to once and a while want to turn it up, well Yamaha. Pluse Yamaha amps are made in Malasia not china like the NAD. That may be important to some people. Yamaha is much bigger company, which allows them more funds in research and development. Yamaha is heavy, look at the amps with top off and the Yami will have huge hsinks. Class d does not need big sinks because it is class D. Both amps are good, I like both. But for me the nad is not worth 250 more for less power. If it was rotel , then I would go rotel. Look on the used market and the yamaha holds it value better then the c328 which you can get for 200-250. That should tell you something. Just my humble thoughts.

СА win

I have a Yamaha RX-V481 and going to the Sony for the built in phono preamplifier. The 481 is tailored to theater entertainment and I haven't used most of its features. It doesn't have a phono preamplifier. I look at electronics these days as disposable, like computers and phones. The Sony is exactly what I'm looking for!

Big difference! But both not made for this kind of "music". Get some old infinty or quadrals would make you happier i think.

In this video, they both sound horrible. So microphone problem?

I have 2 pairs of the Sony SSCS5 speakers. Excellent sounding speakers!

Edifier E25HD is warmer. Egg is brighter. I prefer the warmer sound and can listen to it for longer time.

A gusto mio meglio il suono dell' Aiyiima....

HI, for a 5.1 system which one do you prefer? 4 dali spektor1 plus centre or 4 dali oberon 1 plus centre?

Its seems obvious that the 12.2 would spund vetter (given its a more expensive speaker in same range), but sometimes budgets dictate. The 12.1s seem to still be a really good speaker for their price range.

Honestly this was so close to call. There's a tiny difference in the crossover tuning but overall they play so well that when switching over is was hard to tell unless really concentrating very hard. And Bedroom followed by All The Way Up is such a sweet demo cause it's so radically different but so pleasing.

Have heard both of these in person and I would say they are actually about equal in performance but have a different presentation. Yamaha has that more forward neutral sound and the Cambridge has that classic warm signature British sound. All comes down to what sounds better to your ears. If you like the Yamaha sound then you're in luck as it's significantly cheaper than the Cambridge. In fact you could step up to the Yamaha A S801 and still save vs the Cambridge. The Yamaha 801 has a better DAC, more power at 100 watts, detachable power cord. Yamaha hifi equipment offers great value for the price all around. A better comparison would be the Cambridge AXR 85 vs the Yamaha A S501 as they are priced closed to each other; that would be a tough contest though.

Ok so lets be honest you can not distinctively tell how good or better one amp sounds compared to another from a KZbin video. I own several amps including the 2 in this video and believe me there is a massive audible difference between the audiolab 6000a and the Yamaha RS202. That's not to say the Yamaha sounds bad; it's actually quiet good and provides a lot of value for anyone starting out in the hobby. The Yamaha also blows the doors off of any cheap Chi Fi class D amp out there period.

I picked C overall and it wasn't a surprise for me when I discovered it was the 4.2 Evo. I own them and I am very satisfied with their performance especially if you consider the price/quality ratio.

I just bought the ELACs along with the 5.2 center channel. They are fabulous as a front trio in a surround system! Front porting is perfect for smaller rooms

Неужели лучше моих Edifier G2000 звучат?

At that volume I like the Marantz. The voice sounds softer and not in your face

A good comparison between those excellent speskers, although the music selection was not quite good. It was a teenager selection. 👎

Yamaha has the crispiest sound - my preference

Elacs

I have both the emacs are definitely better

A video like this with no commentary after or during is kinda pointless . Everything basically sounds the same cause you are amplifying it through whatever you already have. I mean I guess there is SOME difference, but its like test driving a car watching a video.

What is on the top of amplifier?

B & C 👍👍🙂🙂

Sony has a fuller sound and the yamaha is more detailed

Ok first of all, thanks for the efforts put on making this video. However despite the 3 amps in here it's the speaker itself that is the weakest in chain here i.e the ugly looking kef which doesn't have any bass to even begin with. Now on the tests, it was very easy to differentiate between the AX and CX series as the AX25 and 35 sounds exactly the same. CX sounds little more focused at least on the video. But with CX series u loose the tone control. I really wish Cambridge should produce a 55watts AX series as well so that budget audiophiles can have more speaker selections with out breaking the bank. Suggestion to E-Project :On the second song you should have shuffled the order of the amps in the blind test portion mark. For me personally I even loved the axa25 when I had auditioned it once with elac speakers.

For instrumentals, I like the Q350 better. But vocals sound a little muddy and I prefer the R200 for vocals.

How can you use a bright sounding Yamaha with bright sounding Dalis ?? That's too much!

dont test with rocks song, test it with an classic sound

I have to admit that the R200 sound better, BUT not excessively better. That is because the ES20s are great speakers as well. I find that the R200 mids are more powerful, more defined, without affecting the highs and low. In my case the price difference does not justify an upgrade S20 > R200

When I listen to the Polks they sound quite good to my ears (good base, crystal highs). BUT when music switches to the Elacs, they sound as if you put the Polks in a can, in a box, muffled, dull and flat, without character. Who cares they were designed by Andrew Jones when yhey are very boring to listen to. Conclusion... Why pay so much money for Elacs when they sound like an average quality speaker pair. They have a good look though... Sound and image are always subjective. Some like saturated colors, and some washed out colors. Some like the sound bright, some like it blunt.

Amir at Audio Science Review tested both of these receivers, but only recommended the Yamaha. Although neither is rated for 4 ohm speakers, he ran 4 ohm speakers on both receivers, and the Sony receiver overheated and broke when running 4 ohm speakers. The Yamaha was able to run the 4 ohm speaker without overheating.

Both are incredible , i think they are the best on their category. The Monitor Audio i like better on classical music. Overall the 12.2 are nr. 1. Someone know a better speaker then 12.2 in this budget ? (Around 300 Euro are both in mt country)

Close call, Goes to show you sound is subjective. The Emotiva sounds more detailed, the Yamaha is smoother and more Vibrant

Extreme differences in sound. Does it make sense? DA-9 sounds almost "honky". I did not think such a big difference could be possible.

Micca ❤️