2017 Toyota RAV4 vs Honda CR-V Comparison

[@courtneydurham8429]

My RAV4 may not be as big or sleek as the CRV but I know my transmission will last.

[@Skateforlifelad]

Exactly why I went Toyota, easy 200k mile rig if maintained

[@bryant4the328]

How’s it holding up nowadays

[@courtneydurham8429]

@@bryant4the328 I love my car. 💞💕💞

[@daleval2182]

Exactly

[@Helton_Campos87]

🙃

[@goldenfire5]

Test drove both of these: for taller drivers and passengers, the Honda has less leg room on the passenger side. The seats were not as deep either, which is important for long trips. I also found the infotainment screen more convoluted. The reported engine oil mixing with gas issue is also not cool. Anyway, I got a RAV4 Hybrid, could not be happier.

[@daleval2182]

Exactly, he missed that

[@rayvalero8580]

Yeah my dad just bought a 2014 RAV4 with only 57k miles. I bought a 2022 cr-v brand new. And while I was sitting on the rav4 it felt roomier. And the trunk looked bigger on the rav4 too. Weird.

[@southbound1969]

You neglected to mention that the Rav4 is blessed with a tried and true automatic and the CRV has the dreaded CVT transmission. Very important. That alone would steer me towards the Toyota.

[@JohnSmith-dt7gu]

He’s probably more of a technology guy.

[@miragexl007]

@Joe M he definitely seems like a Honda guy. I get the positives of the CRV. But the pros / positives of the Toyota over the CRV, as of right now, that I'm thinking of... And he didn't dwell on or even mentioned

[@commandertaco1762]

Honda and toyota cvt is fine. It's the nissan and American ones you want to watch out for

[@007lutherking]

Skotty kilmer did mention the transmission torque converter issue that caused jittering in the crv every once in a while, but they can still keep going and no need to change that if youre not too bothered by it for the ones who already own one, I'm thinking of going for the 2013 rav 4

[@truthistruth615]

There's nothing wrong with a CVT!

[@KUBBI7488]

My dad has 99 rav4 with 196k mile and only was replaced timing belt , water pump and rear pass hub ! still runs like a beast!

[@usandutz]

What the reviewer did not know at the time of testing is that the Honda 1,5l turbo engine has got a big problem with oil dilution, causing catastrophic engine failure. It's a very nice SUV, just get it in the 2.0l hybrid guise.

[@daleval2182]

Exactly, his cocky smile will be gone at 100 000 or less

[@darylblackburn9946]

I got this his exact C-RV for my wife as a family car and we absolutely love it. we did test drive the RAV-4 and she chose honda. we love this car.

[@daleval2182]

Watch those turbo temps, and CVT trans, both are new tech, i tend to stay with tech proven to go over 300 k

[@ldawson103]

40 inches of rear seat leg room in the CR-V is pretty amazing. That's more than a Pilot.

[@ytSuns26]

I have owned two Honda’s, I have owned three Toyota’s. I am not going back to troublesome Honda’s. Love all of my Toyota’s

[@miragexl007]

Reliability, and cost to repair. Pepper which I've kind of investigated. Toyotas. Always here of little things with Honda. And they're more expensive to fix. Last I knew for the same type issue. I could be wrong there

[@commandertaco1762]

Toyota is without a doubt more reliable but at least honda doesn't make fugly sedans

[@jackrabbit5047]

Major issue with latter-day CRV models is a very badly designed direct gas injection system, which causes a lot of fouling of valves, and worse, dilution of oil with gasoline (by some reports, a very substantial amount of gas gets by the pistons and into the oil sump). Unfortunately, Hondas ain't what they used to be, and because I want my cars to last a long time, I will go with a Toyota any day. These reviews are not all that helpful as they tend to focus on gadgets and attributes of a brand new car, which says nothing about downstream maintenance and operating costs.

[@jalenpascascio]

Clearly this was not a comparison, they should have called it "Why the crv is better than the rav 4"....seemed biased to me, he even spent more time in the Honda

[@hughjargon4347]

Kinda unfair to compare the antique Toyota to a new Honda.

[@ubashan100]

I agree

[@hiramrosajr8231]

Prince JT cuz it was better

[@muhammaddaniyalrashid9463]

Lol yeah

[@FatalAnimal]

Nope - not even close www.carcomplaints.com/Honda/CR-V/2018/engine/

[@cuongong1649]

The reviewer failed to mention oil dilution problems found in 2017 - 2018 CRV with 1.5 l turbo

[@daleval2182]

Honda must have gave him a coat and hat, lmao, cherry pick review

[@linhunnicutt6556]

This reviewer doesn't know the difference between cubic feet and cubic inches.

[@SelmerVidz1]

All of the specs are listed in cubic feet from the manufacturer. Exactly what we listed here. So I'm not sure what you're talking about.

[@redcuffs3274]

Lin, I think he does. He just made a verbal faux pas where his brain was thinking inches. Btw, where are your video car reviews where you have to remember what to say while on camera?

[@SelmerVidz1]

I hear it now! It was definitely just a slip of the tongue. All the specs listed on the screen, in cubic feet, are the correct ones.

[@lightningsmokerXx]

-Honda CRV has a CVT transmission which automatically disqualifies it from my list. Toyota & Honda prob make a better CVT than nissan (if they even make it). But CVT's aren't proven reliable in the North American Market. -If you want to keep the car past warranty, i'd be going Toyota 100% as it has a conventional auto transmission.

[@daleval2182]

I dont think he reads comments, that smile may not last, Honda has lost ground since 2012

[@Obie327]

We Got the 2017 Honda CRV LX AWD last year and Absolutely love it. Averaging 28 MPG with the 2.4 liter motor.

[@raydavies6236]

Smart move getting the 2.4 base engine.

[@Tobbots]

What about Toyotas reliability? Sure the RAV4 is an older vehicle without turbos but it is proven to last. Less moving parts equal less issues. 2016+ Honda still needs to show us that it still can be a reliable brand. Im willing to pay a little extra for peace of mind knowing that I will be driving a vehicle that will last and not have any issues.

[@clintcaldwell7232]

I just purchased the 2018 rav4. I spent the better part of the day in the CRV. It was not! Quiet at all. Every time I tried a quick acceleration the turbo lag was significant. I wanted the CRV the interior is better but the road noise engine noise and power lag I have had the Rav for 2 months now and dont regret it one bit

[@daleval2182]

Toyota less road noise, he must have had radio louder lol

[@zilfrithmaduro2117]

I think you just have to do a Honda show only, we can see you are a Honda guy period

[@dennisf1020]

Done the research on reliability. Rav4 wins in its class. Also holds value the best. Honda is a great car. These are the only 2 in this class to consider. Chuck out the rest

[@davidh9968]

He forgot to mention the front end of the Rav looks like a Storm Trooper helmet...picking up our new CRV next weekend. For the haters, we are current owners of a '98 and a V6 powered '08 Rav4 - keeping both for the kids! Also had a '02 CRV but outgrew it for the 7 pax '08 Rav...

[@SpayNeut.Always]

Will the honda CVT last?

[@ureviews]

I test drove the CR-V it's a really nice car. I wish they kept the rear style of the previous gen though. Great ride, great on gas, freakin huge interior, comfortable seats. However, it does have a belt driven CVT, when those break you're out of luck, VERY expensive repair.

[@ARB0204]

ureviews the rear looks like a Volvo

[@ureviews]

No way. When the belt snaps there's no fixing you have to replace the entire thing. When a traditional automatic breaks, usually it's not catastrophic.

[@bloopbloop2019]

ureviews Get a Toyota it will last longer

[@ureviews]

I don't believe Toyota is competitive right now in this segment. They need a refresh/redesign FAST.

[@matt9c1]

Agreed. I am buying a RAV4 just because it doesn't have a CVT. I like the CVT tech, but they just are not reliable enough yet.

[@PuffinDragun69]

The Honda doesn't downshift, it drones because it has a CVT transmission. 2:58

[@davidgrowden769]

A couple years ago when we were SUV shopping we were set on the Rav 4 but drove a crv and the crv was better in every way we ended up with a15 crv we have now owned for over 2 years and love it

[@miragexl007]

Wait 5 to 10 years, if you plan on keeping it that long.. And then give an opinion. LOL to each her own

[@usmc1992usmc]

Uhh, how could you choose the RAV? Well, for no other reason than the main reason: Toyota is absolutely CRUSHING the competition in reliability. Toyota’s ENTIRE model line is above avg or excellent reliability. That’s certainly nothing you can say about any American automaker. Furthermore, Toyota has put significant distance between Honda and Subaru. There’s a reason the top 3 vehicles in America, for holding their value, are Toyota (tacoma, tundra and 4runner). So, if you want a vehicle with some SLIGHT advantages and worse reliability- knock yourself out. I’ll keep buying Toyota and stay out of the shop.

[@shabkn1095]

If for an instance we forget the longevity and reliability issue, most people would attract to CR-V when for buying a new car. RAV4 is too clumsy and boring to stay with. Highly appreciated AutoGuide for making of such a nice video. One iteration need to be correct. Its cu-ft not cu- in

[@vickyburton2434]

I will never own another vehicle with a CVT. We just purchased a 2017 Rav 4 and love it!

[@DanDan-pn8js]

Toyota is leaps and bounds ahead of Honda

[@vickyburton2434]

@@DanDan-pn8js I agree!

[@ChicagoOutfit1900]

As far as styling goes, I find the CRV much more attractive

[@miragexl007]

I find it the same old Honda look Pier. Which is just old / flat to me and boring. But to each their own

[@skipglobal2915]

After driving Honda Accord EX cars for 23 years, I "defected" to a RAV4 Limited Hybrid. I did so because both my mechanic and I have concerns about the longevity and cost to repair turbochargers such as that in the CR-V EX. (I keep my cars 10 years.) My wife's two Priuses have been totally reliable, so no concerns here with the Toyota Hybrid system. I probably would have gone for the CR-V EX had Honda continued to offer the AWD model with the trusty 2.4L engine. Hopefully, some long term data will prove the Honda 1.5L turbocharged engine to be just as reliable and my concerns unfounded. The RAV4 Hybrid does get better gas mileage, has a tad more HP and no turbo lag. I wish that I could pick things that I like both cars as if from a Chinese menu.

[@Fadic4]

Rav 4 is on an old platform. It can't compete with the CR-V until they update it using the TNGA then maybe it'll have a chance.

[@ethan02135]

Fadic 4 I agree hopefully then it will kill the Honda.

[@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947]

Fadic 4 I'm expecting an all-new 5th-gen RAV4 for the 2019 model year. Hopefully it will borrow the 2018 Camry's 2.5L 4-Cylinder, and I hope the V6 will come back. TNGA will obviously underpin it.

[@ldawson103]

Ethan S Unfortunately Toyotas in apples to apples comparisons with a Honda will rarely go in Toyota's favor. All of Hondas mainstream vehicles will trump a comparable Toyota. I sell Toyotas and we lose more customers to Honda than any other brand.

[@azera55555]

Would still get a RAV4 any day because I dislike Honda's styling and the CRV doesn't have a hybrid option

[@supernova4300]

ldawson103 So why isnt Honda selling better generally?

[@oldgoat50]

I have the EX=L model of CRV you are showing and it was new in 3-2017. I have only had to replace the battery at 14 months, fix the shift button as it broke off in my hand and a few other things. Oh and it has 11500 mile on it now, but does get around 30 mpg all around driving.

[@TheSaqibbhai]

honda will burn your engine oil after 70k miles and most likely the transmission will die after 100k. Toyota is solid and way to go

[@darnoc698]

ive had had my Honda element for over 250,000 miles and still running good. so I don't have clue what you are talking about.

[@Fucklesticks]

@@darnoc698 Of course, it's powered by a different engine...

[@kzrr7009]

Exactly ..

[@dsteffler54]

It’s not a Honda element now is it? This CRV has a 1.5L turbo in it and owners are having serious problems with it, so I suggest you pull your head out of where you have it.

[@usandutz]

@@dsteffler54 You're totally right. I was considering buying one as they're really cheap in the 1,5l turbo guise. But after some research, I understood why they're so cheap. I guess I'll go for the 2.0l hybrid, as I do like the rest of the car.

[@WRNPR]

As a new owner of a 18’ CRV EX I can say that the Honda is the best choice although thing could easily change in 2019.

[@normt5463]

Wilfredo Rodriguez "...Honda and Dongfeng Motor Group, includes free replacements of the air conditioning control unit and a software upgrade for the electronic control unit, besides replacing the motor oil, air filter and adding new engine cleanser. For models equipped with continuously variable transmissions, the recall will also provide a replacement of the bottom water pipe for the radiator, and a software upgrade for the transmission control unit. Industry insiders have questioned the real reason for the recall as both the water pipe and the air conditioning have little to do with engine lubricant." ChinaDaily

[@ART200807]

Also none of RAV4 2017-2018 models have AC for rear seat passengers, located on the armrest between front seats, facing to the rear seat passengers. Very bad if you live in Las Vegas.

[@methohealz7341]

This guy clearly doesn't fancy RAV4, not a comparison.

[@jedidiahogunranti7105]

AutoGuide really needs to stop this, when they are comparing two cars (especially Honda) they tend to focus on the car that they like a little more witch i dont like. They are supposed to have reviewers that they dont like either car and it should be thee first time driving it that is what makes a good car reviewer

[@stanislavdenikin]

Am I the only one looking at 2.5L Hybrid Rav4 and thinking... nah, no honda crv can beat this 2.5L power/speed with 5-6L consumpt? :)

[@BTC909]

The lease money factors on the CR-V are crrrrazy high.

[@laurentiu244]

These comparisons are open minded and relevant . Thank you .

[@miragexl007]

LOL. Open-minded unbiased? Pretty funny. How much mention about reliability, transmission comparisons, engine comparison to other than power / fuel economy

[@miragexl007]

Always love the cost comparison... Depends on options, Haiti all inclusive Top Model options which many people don't care about all the options. So it depends on what you want in the model you want. How about the base model comparison prices? That never seems to be mentioned much. I hate the high-end model comparisons... Which always seems to be the case here on KZbin

[@iknowit4001]

Just look at the resale value's on each of them and that will give you a good idea which one is better.

[@daleval2182]

Toyota wins

[@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947]

Coming up next, head-to-head comparison between the 2018 Toyota Camry and 2018 Honda Accord, which is unveiling today...... See ya later, dudes!

[@Coregame3]

link

[@couchchip9013]

FarhantheMovieGuy. AKA: MovieSimulator9000 i

[@dj2big]

How could I not choose a Honda CRV? Engine issues like gas mixing with oil. That’s how.

[@paulyskidda387]

What when did that happen? Ive never seen that working at honda dealership for 10 years

[@ChrisLoneWalker]

Test drive the CR-V and found it to feel slow even though the numbers suggest it’s faster. Not very confidence inspiring when passing or merging onto highways. As always test drive before you buy.

[@chrisrentfrow1400]

Cvt is an instant turn off for me.

[@Mystyles777]

Doesn’t matter what it is, he still like CR-V, who care Toyota keep moving forward. Long lasting 👍

[@bigblue7614]

I like both. But Honda looks nicer. But I have a question? Every time I watch a video where it does a comparison between the two auto makers ( Toyota and Honda) the reviewer always picks Honda. But auto numbers don't lie. Toyota sales blows past Honda every year. Whether it's the Camry, Rav 4, Highlander. Toyota sales always bets Honda. What gives ?

[@miragexl007]

Perhaps two main things.. Reliability, cost and ease to fix... Which all seems to point to Toyota. And in my / experience it does point to Toyota. Those two things aren't really mentioned here. After all it's a car / transportation. And not a Jacuzzi or mansion

[@daleval2182]

Exactly, he saved 1500,and will spend 5700,when his turbo, or CVT blows a belt, and it will before 200k

[@harcık368]

You cannot do anything wrong by buying Honda or Toyota as long as you don't buy any other brand!

[@miragexl007]

Watched again... after watching other videos . OMG. Definitely a channel not to come get unbiased equal reviews. Cheers to those who would I do.

[@paulc858]

I have a Honda CR-V now. Wanted to get a newer one. Only thing I don’t like is the turbo and CVT on a Honda. I’m old school simple engine and regular transmission is what I like. RAV 4 might be the choice.

[@mlamike]

The RAV4 does come with two USB slots in the rear. Also the safety systems are standard on all models, unlike CRV that charges $1500 for similar features. Auto high beam is standard on RAV4 not available on CRV.

[@razorwolf]

Are you sure there is no two 2.5 usb port underneath the rear vents of the crv

[@mlamike]

Honda safety sense not available on the LX model. Toyota safety sense standard on all models.

[@bloopbloop2019]

What he also did not get is reliability!

[@consumerreview2k]

Theres definitely 2 usb ports in the rear for the crv and honda sensing is indeed standard in the ex crv or higher. Plus. Dont listen to this guy. Honda sensing includes all the safety technology like collision mitigation, road departure mitigation, addaptive cruise control. And lane keep assistance. Also ex or higher gives you the blind spot monitors in the side view mirrors standard. And automatic high beams as well. Cloth heated seats. Remote start. Apple car play and android auto. Sunroof led front and tale lights. Fog lights. And a multi angle backup camera and a 4cylinder turbo engine. No brainer against the rav4. And thats all standard.

[@shakyakeeragala5117]

it was a great video bro.acturlly fantastik one.i havent words

[@francisyawyeboah3615]

CEV

[@Soh90]

"Now when it comes to windshields the Honda wins again as it's windshield is clearer. Now when it comes to bumpers both are good picks but the Honda is just better because it's red. Also, both of these cars have badges but H comes before T in the alphabet so the Honda takes the win there also" Seriously this guy was so dry. Anyway, was this a serious comparison? The RAV4 is 5 years old now, nearing the very end of its life cycle. The CR-V is brand new. Compare the upcoming TNGA RAV4 with the new 2.5L 4 making 200+ hp. Not this old car. A better comparison would have been the NEW Equinox or NEW CX-5. But I guess he just wanted to Honda to look good.... or the Toyota to look bad? I don't know these days.

[@ultratech6671]

Cecil L yeah but its not like its a discontinued model, toyota is trying to get people to buy it still

[@mastap4713]

There are countless videos comparing the 2017 Cr-v to the 2017 Rav-4. Not just this one. Because they both are each other's main competitor. And they both get high praises.

[@mastap4713]

The current Rav-4 generation is outdated and in need of a refreshment update. The new CR-V was redesigned for 2017 and kicks the Rav-4's ass in almost every department!

[@guniseran]

Not sure if CRV can last as long as Rav4. Plus you might be facing turbo issues down the road with CRV

[@MrRedskins0021]

CVT kills the CRV. Rav4 has better reliability and holds its value.

[@motleydude73]

Driven both the CR-V is leagues ahead.

[@miragexl007]

Reliability, engine issues, transmission, cost to fix / easier to fix.?

[@iLikeTigerz101]

CRV hands down! Cause of Apple car play and android auto. Come on Toyota stop living like its 1986.

[@jedidiahogunranti7105]

Dude y do u freak out over apple car play and android auto, my acura mdx has no apple carplay or android auto and still looks better and is faster??????

[@kurtisbillerman1459]

Well I can buy a RAV4 LE base model with a touchscreen and all the safety features but on the crv base model you can't even get a touchscreen or any safety features..!

[@johnlavery6116]

Honda.crv..you can't beat this car..love everything about it. Greetings from Ireland

[@ErwinSchrodinger64]

Did anyone notice that really nice volume button Honda decided to put back into the center stack. I have a 2017 Honda Accord and after living with this car for 8 months, I never realized how nice a circular volume button is. Damn you Honda. Awesome car by the way. However, with Honda's there's always a trade off. Honda makes the ugliest rims in the business. Everything else is awesome (minus the CVT).

[@azera55555]

ErwinSchrodinger64 I really don't like Honda's styling. I agree with you with the rims, and I hate the chrome bar grilles they put on everything. So ugly. I also don't like how they don't put a tune know so the dashboard is asymmetrical and doesn't look good

[@waseemsells5378]

ErwinSchrodinger64 I have a 16 crv and I never use the volume control(touch) on the deck when driving. I only use the steering wheel control. It makes more sense, more convenient and safe.

[@williamliu940]

ErwinSchrodinger64 the crvs wheels look like fidget spinner advertisements, but everything else, like you said, is nice.

[@josephinezumakpeh1556]

Great Honda Ad!

[@roliarchie6582]

hows the CR-V oil dilution problem coming along?

[@user-uq7io2os3r]

Still going strong 😂

[@rainystorm88]

Finally a comparison that makes sense! :) good job autoguide

[@yamilmedina7194]

Rav 4 is much better..

[@chrisanderson2204]

Toyota is all about economy while Honda is about real performance

[@caffeinelife]

This reviewer seems focused on very minor points for complaints on both models. I’ve sat in both of these cars and I think the RAV is way more comfortable. He didn’t mention the rear seats recline. Just a poor review

[@waseemsells5378]

Honda is on its way back.

[@htbai2250]

Shall we talk about CVT and off-road?

[@kevtech733]

I have a 2018 Honda CRV TOURING and I would disagree with your motor comment. It has plenty of power and sounds great when you what to giver.

[@guniseran]

There is a reason why Toyota sticks to naturally aspirated engines and traditional gear-based transmission

[@jamiemartinello6436]

Excellent review, Stephen! Accept it people... Honda is ahead of the curve when compared to Toyota, and historically always has been. Toyota consistently sells outdated designs at prices that aren't terribly competitive. Not saying they are bad cars, but Toyota is always too slow to adapt to newer technologies, and their interior designs are usually less than competitive. Win for Honda!

[@Kellric7]

In USA maybe, but check in Europe, Honda's sinking and Toyota beats them on all segments. C-HR is true success here (we have hybrid version) and the same goes for RAV4.

[@Toyota4Life]

Not sure why they used a older car against a brand new model.... anyway I would still take the rav-4 4WD. I also think the older rav-4 looks better

[@JHendy]

I just started driving and I've been really into looking at cars and I can't decide which one of these two cars should be my first car

[@zard1214]

JHendy I have 2016 RAV4. It is a nice car and all but it is bit disappointing in accelerating unless I put it in sports mode. CRV will give you bit of uncomfortable feeling when you start to accelerate from stop but that goes same for every turbo engines. Either will serve you well.

[@nicknike122987]

Well first off I appreciate you doing a review on the tow top selling suv segments in the industry. However you didn't give the right specs and when it comes to the front seat there is more head leg and shoulder room in the Rav4. The Rav4 also has a heads up display which gives the driver a safer way to use there phone and even see there nav display turning directions where the odometer is where the crv does not. When you are rating technology Rav4 also has more it gives and is even easier to use no matter the age. The honda is also a 6 speed transmission with an ability to lock in the differential to improve driving on bad roads. I like the fact you compared them but you were very one sided so i take it you are using only your opinion or you are not aware of how to use certain features that they both have.

[@miragexl007]

Yes, this kind of irritated me as I'm looking for unbiased equal reviews. But what is that?. But this was a little over-the-top towards one side.. Neglecting some important things period. I believe, too many

[@jamesok1436]

How on earth was this an easy choice This is the hardest choice

[@seidadem3167]

How could you don't choose the CR-V??? Simple, because of the CVT transmission you failed to mention.

[@miragexl007]

Not to mention projected reliability indoor cost to repair of.. Of many things

[@normt5463]

Skip the 1.5t fekm Honda until they figure out the fuel diluting the oil. "...Honda and Dongfeng Motor Group, includes free replacements of the air conditioning control unit and a software upgrade for the electronic control unit, besides replacing the motor oil, air filter and adding new engine cleanser. For models equipped with continuously variable transmissions, the recall will also provide a replacement of the bottom water pipe for the radiator, and a software upgrade for the transmission control unit. Industry insiders have questioned the real reason for the recall as both the water pipe and the air conditioning have little to do with engine lubricant." ChinaDaily

[@ryanlittleton5615]

Those additional parts don't have anything to do with lubrication. However those parts have to do with getting the engine warm up more quickly, which is what the problem is. For some reason this engine takes an abnormally long time to warm up. But what I can't figure out, is why it's so much worse on the CR-V than other Hondas with this engine (virtually nonexistent on the Accord). Why do you think that is?

[@bjc_9975]

The cr-v is soooooo much better looking than the rav4gina in my opinion

[@bizgivbiz]

2017 Hybrid Limited actually actually is a better comparison imo minus a few features that wouldn’t be discussed here

[@ranum1257]

you forgot to mention crv s frontal collision mitigation

[@nabilm2941]

great job reviewing those cars. honest and straight to the point. the viewer has a clear idea about both cars and what to choose at the end of the video.

[@miragexl007]

LOL. That's a pretty funny comment

[@niacal4nia]

When the CVT and turbo fail, you have enough time to admire the interior of the CRV.

[@Phrancis5]

Wow, the new CR-V has won every comparo and that's why I bought it. I do admit the "fidget spinner" rims haven't grown on me and I do wish it had those "surround view" cameras.

[@WarOnCOD]

Phrancis5 You don't need cameras in any vehicle.

[@Phrancis5]

I play FPS games, fly FPV drones, and degrees in industrial design. I've got great 3D spatial awareness. I don't need cameras but my wife does - she already dinged it in a parking deck!

[@marcusfoo4959]

Honda Honda Honda unlike the Toyota. Yeah we know who's the winner before the start of the video

[@yosmilemo]

Good lucky your Honda cvt and change oil issue. I own rav4

[@RICARDOGARCIA-wr9hx]

The rav4 will out live The crv

[@xavierc7497]

I generally prefer honda but recently gor the 2018 RAV @ 8k miles. Im hoping it treats me well.

[@atheistmecca971]

I wish the Honda had a hybrid version here in the US.

[@piseypeov3050]

Thank for informative review

[@miragexl007]

LOL. From a Honda lover point of view of course

[@thainguyen-jf5zu]

The Rav4 exterior looking is as great as the CR-V but interior is otherwise

[@GrantLian]

I've heard the comment about the pricing before. However in the real world, I've gotten significantly lower quotes on RAV 4s than on CRVs. Honda would not really even budge from their first offers.

[@miragexl007]

I know, the pricing thing annoys me. They never compare the base model. The whole options thing... a little different so depending on what you really like or want for the price. Despite the set packages and what they offer.

[@RonnieY999]

I simply don't want to choose the Honda CRV since it has that 1.5L turbocharged engine. It sounds to me it will not last for a long time. I think Honda is going to the wrong direction regarding this engine and it will lose its reliability in the future.

[@skyhigh5157]

Toyota doesn't even have apple car play or android auto. It's 2018 and we still have to pay for their crappy navigation graphics

[@noodezS3nd]

wait till the turbo on the crv blows...

[@crystalslayer1]

I think this guy just likes Honda.

[@deborahmann9437]

I test drove both, chose to buy the Rav 4. The crv was like driving a bus

[@bobaka3918]

I am feeling bad for having a Rav4. And here in Australia we even do not have those camera features.

[@milkovas556]

Honda , of course

[@SpayNeut.Always]

why are the premiums models always the ones compared? These are the least purchased of the models

[@JetSkiBuyFixPlaySellChannel]

How can you possibly recommend the turbo on the CRV when Honda is having problems with fuel getting into the oil. In China they did a recall for this issue. Here in the USA they only provide an oil change. I will continue to avoid turbos, CVTs and direct injection like the plague. Call me crazy but I prefer long term reliability. For the record I own a 2015 Mazda CX-9 so I'm not a Toyota fanboy.

[@aLaRmCaLL1983]

Nice review but try not to scream through the whole video next time. Natural voice would be less annoying