this is the type of conversation that make people annoyed at “the left” because it’s just common sense to understand that saying “women” in the context of abortion is referring to (biological)sex. Those few trans-men out there are not being called-out, ignored or attacked by someone speaking simply, by using the word “women.”
@REdds-ws4ll3 жыл бұрын
43% of Women are anti abortion (pro life ), and 64% of women would like restrictions on abortions. And yet; abortion is always presented in the mainstream as a 'women's issue'; as if those women referenced above do not exist or count.
@K1forMVP3 жыл бұрын
A trans women will never need to worry about getting or needing an abortion anyways because last time I checked men cannot get pregnant. And I dont care what hormones, injections etc anyone trans women is on they aren't growing ovaries and eggs AKA female reproductive organs in their lifetime.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Gender ideology, by design, is predicated on removing sex from any conversation or space, so this is exactly why the T community acts as if "woman" needs to be erased from any dialogue about women's issues.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
@@REdds-ws4ll It is a woman's issue, as only women require abortions. Just because some women don't agree doesn't make it not a women's rights issue.
@REdds-ws4ll3 жыл бұрын
@@ncorp2668 That is a very disingenuous interpretation of the "women's rights" when it comes to abortion. When nearly half all women oppose it and about 2 in 3 would like to see abortions restricted. Your argument, would be akin to somebody 50 plus years ago saying 'war is a men's issue' as only men fight it. It would be absurd; just as your reasoning here.
@jaimhaas51703 жыл бұрын
This whole segment reminds me that rhetoric can be used to sound so smart but in reality is just word salad.
@alop95353 жыл бұрын
Kinda like an anus
@noahpaulog76172 жыл бұрын
That was Obama's whole schtick.
@mrjay12682 жыл бұрын
💯💯
@Bob-zd4od2 жыл бұрын
Well said word salad exactly how Marxism works I call BS
@k.h.a.l.i.l.2 жыл бұрын
@@noahpaulog7617 Obama is very plain spoken. you're confessing your stupidity.
@DaleCarterDrives3 жыл бұрын
The idiocy at the root of this entire conversation is just mind boggling.
@Nico_Conradie3 жыл бұрын
Defying the laws of physics and nature lol, the power of make believe is magical
@marthacanady94413 жыл бұрын
Right. With all the legitimate problems out there in the world today, they are wasting time and brainpower discussing THIS? ABSURD. The only people in the WORLD talking about these issues are media types. Real people talk about real issues.
@mikitz3 жыл бұрын
Just so that you know, from now on I want you all to call me Loretta.
@skyearl18163 жыл бұрын
Why are you guys commenting on this issue if it is a waste of time tho
@marthacanady94413 жыл бұрын
@@skyearl1816 Pulled it up to see what was on offer and saw that ridiculous subject. That’s why. I certainly didn’t listen to the whole thing after I heard the first moronic comments. It’s akin to listening to a serious discussion on whether or not aliens have abducted Biden’s brain. Oh, wait a minute maybe that is he only explanation.
@MrLewyboy3 жыл бұрын
I cannot believe grown adults are having this conversation.
@ellenbienenfeld84303 жыл бұрын
Right??
@paulw37473 жыл бұрын
Lol... God help us all.
@user-microburst3 жыл бұрын
True!!!! It goes without saying that the baby is the one that matters
@daddynanners39443 жыл бұрын
Because they aren't adults. They are adult-sized children.
@ANTIStraussian3 жыл бұрын
@@user-microburst Not if the baby is going to kill my wife, by bleeding to death.
@patmyles47763 жыл бұрын
We nearly always talk about Native Americans as if they were all one tribe. There were hundreds of tribes with diverse cultures.
@xaspirate80603 жыл бұрын
Right. And many of them did not get along with the other tribes. That is something that will not be brought up in History class for a long , long time.
@tafike223 жыл бұрын
Just like there are countless white cultures, black culture, Latino cultures, etc. White doesn't mean white. Black doesn't mean black. We may have differences, but we are all children of a greater power. We are all special in our own way, but that uniqueness does not mean we get to control others. Stand up. Show all that we accept everyone. But no one deservers to control us all. We all have a voice, but we must be willing to speak honestly. Even if is in despite of what we believe. Only when we let go of being selfish can we stand together. My beliefs see us all as children of GOD. Your beliefs may differ. That is ok, but we can agree that we all came from somewhere, and that somewhere is greater than ourselves. Let go of your own self interest, and let us find and become what we are supposed to be.
@TheColdplay2003 жыл бұрын
@@xaspirate8060 And an even longer for when we talk about how many tribes had slavery. It's almost as if human beings aren't perfect on every fucking spectrum. Regardless, history isn't looking for friends. Usually at the bowling alley with its pal logic. Those guys and their routine.
@jhitchcock55033 жыл бұрын
Same thing with Africa. We act like it's just a country but it's three times the size of the United States with a vast array of cultures that speak hundreds of different languages.
@josh182303 жыл бұрын
They also owned slaves, wiped out entire tribes, and killed animals. The entire narrative of the noble savage perpetuated by the left wing is a false idea, as well as the entire history of the colonists versus the natives to begin with
@Dan_Capone3 жыл бұрын
If "Two Spirit" is a Native American concept, wouldn't it be cultural appropriation if the white man starts using it? According to the woke narrative it should be. And also, it perpetuates the idea that women and men are fundamentally different (they have different spirits), instead of being just a learned and cultural convention, like the trans community says. When you try to warp the reality you fall into so many contradictions it's astounding.
@malcolmshane30393 жыл бұрын
Well said.
@awesomewxyz70833 жыл бұрын
Woke is their religion. It's bad one with little consistency.
@kamicam29883 жыл бұрын
dope comment. I was thinking the same
@starobservers98623 жыл бұрын
Every man was once a female in another life as female is the dominate common generic form of man. Feminine is nature and why we say mother. A man lives several lives and different states. The seman a powerful tool is utilized to raise the holy spirit up the spine or Kundalini. By not allowing a physical discharge then the energy is transferred and transmuted up the spine unlocking the tomb in the skull. Awaking God consciousness in himself. The woman is there to assist the man in his awaking from his deep sleep. He rests in Sabbath. Meaning is deep. Search law of one if you wish to understand more esoteric knowledge like this. For woman are like men and do this naturally without effort and gives life abundantly but man must transmute his energy and use it wisely or suffer pain and death. This common knowledge of two spirit preceded native Americans and were taught to them by the survivors of Atlantis who where white Caucasians. They brought agriculture and civilization to the uncivilized and guess what! They did not condemn any form of love for woman were the great teacher and holy spirit incarcerated as are men. We all are from an androgynous single sex spirit that has both polarities of male and female and we return to that spirit form after death. Only here are we divided by polarity and sex. All bodies will come together into one body including the gay and trans. They are part of you father
@kevindwelle16253 жыл бұрын
Basically If all parents would just teach their children empathy decency and respect for all people we wouldn't have these serious problems or issues in America...
@alienkid3 жыл бұрын
I literally just heard Two Spirit for the first time on this very youtube clip
@taycarroll11243 жыл бұрын
It originated from from Native American tribes to describe lgbt people. The more you know.
@SunDown.3 жыл бұрын
That means you're ignorant on the subject.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
It's a worthless, homophobic idea. No need to know about it. Two spirit was mostly in reference to gay men, and it implied they were less of men because of it. It's pro-gender roles.
@peepeepoopyhead5103 жыл бұрын
Lucky you
@disciplewill76963 жыл бұрын
Same, I've heard of three Spirit before though.
@lindalance25323 жыл бұрын
I am Native American. I am appalled. Two spirit? That’s just plain nuts!
@retalittlegeorge30673 жыл бұрын
I am native American. Twisted.
@AbcAbc-sp1od3 жыл бұрын
@Linda Lance , But are you as native American as Elizabeth Warren?
@Sigueme12 жыл бұрын
Yes. The soul and the demon in the person . Two spirit 😂😂
@lizsalazar88082 жыл бұрын
Is two spirit a legitimately Native American concept? I’ve only heard it used by non Native Americans which makes me skeptical of the claim that two spirit some how represents transgenderism in Native American culture.
@zane62135 Жыл бұрын
@@lizsalazar8808 Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but based on what I've read, sometimes men were born who turned out to be a bit "feminine" - or "gay", as we call it it English. In some tribes, these people were called "two-spirited" and made to work with the women of the tribe. It's really not that radical or surprising.
@TornSoul0624733 жыл бұрын
When I was a kid in school, they used to say: "We're all different, and have different ideologies and beliefs, but we set them aside for the common good." The common good. People don't talk like that any more. We sure could use that right now. It's almost as if we're going to need an extinction-level event to get us to stop arguing and work towards something together without taking sides.
@subodhsarin90983 жыл бұрын
Bad times make strong people, strong people make good times, axxholes like Dan Savage and Gillian Tett emerge during good times, guess where we are headed next?
@birdtower28013 жыл бұрын
That's exactly the one non-negotiable value: common good.
@Krndancedance3 жыл бұрын
Common good? Isn't 'common' the root word for COMMUNISM?! But seriously, the mentality in America has no use for the 'common good' because unfortunately for too many people it boils down to 'screw you, I've got mine."
@TubesForNoobs3 жыл бұрын
The common good? Lol I always love when people say common good and what that really means is the good of their own group, often times at the expense of others, separation is the only way to have unity. There are some values that will never be compromised and the sooner people realize that and voluntarily separate the better it will be.
@shcoky3 жыл бұрын
The out is the ego
@Athelite6663 жыл бұрын
This whole conversation is ludicrous
@breadmoth64433 жыл бұрын
yep , we could be discussing how we could be further exploring space or something, but instead we are talking about nonsensical mental gymnastics about gender.
@advancedsettings96993 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@frederf32273 жыл бұрын
It's not ridiculous for the albeit small fraction of people this pertains to. It's a big deal for them. The shit they put up with on this front is not trivial, it's just rare. Like if they were ripping the arms off heterochromic siamese twins born on the third tuesday of every month... not a wide ranging issue but still an injustice.
@advancedsettings96993 жыл бұрын
@@frederf3227 I agree fully, but what we are witnessing is not the same
@Arthog6273 жыл бұрын
@@frederf3227 you missed the point.
@Karmingiry3 жыл бұрын
I live in a third world country and we all have ID for voting. How can a developed nation like the US not want voter ID? The rest of the convo had me lost 😅
@JonathanGarza163 жыл бұрын
Mee too, I could not believe it when I found out they don't have voter ID in every state
@lastarrmorris31233 жыл бұрын
The problem with voter ID is if you recently moved to a new state because of work, school or decided to relocate it takes a while for a state recognize that you live there. So if you moved to a new state in June and elections are in November you may not be able to vote because the state might not recognize you by then. This happens often to black Americans who move to another state let alone another county in that state
@Karmingiry3 жыл бұрын
@@lastarrmorris3123 and it doesn't happen to white Americans? Anyway I'm just perplexed that America as a first world country can't solve such a simple problem. Is it very hard to have a national ID? Or why can't they use social security number?
@lastarrmorris31233 жыл бұрын
@@Karmingiry it is a a messed up system we do have a national ID but because of the fear of over voting they prefer that people vote in there own state, city and county. That way they can make sure people don't vote twice. Not to mention people don't even get a chance to vote due to voting hours, not enough voting machines voting machines breaking down. Our whole election system and it's process is messed up
@RollingCalf3 жыл бұрын
@@lastarrmorris3123 isn't that what absentee ballots are for?
@trayvonparker47723 жыл бұрын
Dan is the type of man to make coffee for his wife’s boyfriend.
@mlondon11573 жыл бұрын
That has to win comment of the day 😂
@ashmoe_bangs79863 жыл бұрын
If you were trying to say Dan looks and sounds Gay, that’s because he is Gay. So he wouldn’t have a wife.
@gstar35693 жыл бұрын
He is what we on the right call a "beta orbiting soy boy".
@christinegreene19863 жыл бұрын
😆
@SupremeInvigilator3 жыл бұрын
What is "make coffee" a gay euphemism for?
@zachary_attackery3 жыл бұрын
The party that "believes in science" also thinks men can menstruate
@frederf32273 жыл бұрын
They can, at least the tiny proportion that are biologically female but social-gender male. You understand how that works or you don't. Calling those that understand it unscientific is demonstrating your ignorance.
@zachary_attackery3 жыл бұрын
@@frederf3227 There is no science that says men can menstruate.
@jenwalls79743 жыл бұрын
@@frederf3227 if born female then you are a female science
@kianis12063 жыл бұрын
@@frederf3227 smh your argument is purely semantics a play on words..We call people with vaginas women the sam sway we call animals with feathers and beak a bird..we use word to describe things we see hear In our reality..
@chrisbaker30663 жыл бұрын
@@zachary_attackery Your ignorance screams here old mate! You wouldn't dislike trans people at all would you???
@WBKimmons3 жыл бұрын
This whole discussion is just ridiculous
@anthonybrett3 жыл бұрын
Yep!
@Potterhead503 жыл бұрын
As a woman who had an awful pregnancy and who is currently breastfeeding my 10 month old baby, I find it offensive that the words breast or women are being taken out of certain titles to appease transgendered people.
@ultimatebailer2 жыл бұрын
Grow up then?
@alexbeardsley7512 жыл бұрын
@@ultimatebailer I'd say the same thing to you. Its not right for women to be subjected to a small percentage of people who constantly have their feelings hurt. This is ass backwards
@ultimatebailer2 жыл бұрын
@@alexbeardsley751 subjektets to what?
@imam14ma3soom19942 жыл бұрын
@@ultimatebailer How about erasing of their identity? Are you only capable of speaking in three word sentences?
@martinwashington65432 жыл бұрын
Anne we agree with you. Democrats manufactured the totally fake Republican "war on women" to distract from their actual erasure of women.
@casinoman77043 жыл бұрын
Im not a liberal(thank God) but Bill Maher is the type of liberal I find myself agreeing with about 75% of the time. He has common sense and he isn't a nut case like the guy next to him. Keep pushing the trans stuff at us at the level you are now doing and Trump will be President again or someone just like him..
@AlexM-ht9ff2 жыл бұрын
grow up and get over yourself
@karienrothmann93952 жыл бұрын
A nutcase? Whose nuts are u smoking?
@IsraelCountryCube2 жыл бұрын
@@karienrothmann9395 degenerates can also females who knew? I always have good support for my evidence here.
@IsraelCountryCube2 жыл бұрын
Hey I don’t care that you are atheist I only want you to have morals and values. There’s only morals and values no such thing as evil morals and values because I don’t have to say good along with morals and values those who are empathic truly and have suffered tremendously have morals and values along with ethical standards. That’s those three words are inherently good.
@gw5932 жыл бұрын
Bill is what you call a “classic liberal” What you don’t like is the “radical left” the fringe. It’s not the majority. It’s a minority with a loud voice. Most people are actually in the middle. It’s called being reasonable.
@m.lhenderson58853 жыл бұрын
Someone started a lone clap during bill’s disagreement, you can just tell they looked around nervously and stopped
@terronisaac20983 жыл бұрын
I just caught that 😂 so awkward
@Be_reasonable1013 жыл бұрын
This happens every show now. Everyone is afraid of cancel culture.
@Nathan-gd7xq3 жыл бұрын
@@Be_reasonable101 what do you mean the person in the audience is afraid of cancel culture? Do you think they were worried about being escorted from the building and permanently banned?
@boblazer92203 жыл бұрын
He seems less and less connected to his crowd
@josiplilic33843 жыл бұрын
But that panel,was so "inspiring",that I had to go to bathroom.I remember people like Cornel West,late George Carlin,Tarantino ect,were coming to his show.Oh Bill🤕🤕🤕R.I.P. Norm MacDonald,with Leonard Cohen greatest Canadian ever(to me)
@CamBlow3 жыл бұрын
Dennis Prager talked about this (men menstruating) and Bill Mahr called him crazy. It was around a year ago.
@dannyarcher63702 жыл бұрын
@jon pork I don't understand. How can he be crazy if he predicted it? That would usually imply high levels of reason and rationality.
@boomerang89092 жыл бұрын
If that's the case, shouldn't Bill call Arnie's 1994 film Junior crazy?
@rohanjoshi3792 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/fIfSmmCBi5t3b5I
@boomerang89092 жыл бұрын
KZbin.com/watch?v=FVoi-KV6D90&t=309s Firstly, there was a small population of trans-women in which Bill answered and has grown exponentially. Secondly, Prager quoted 'men can menstruate' as if more than 50% of men do. Thirdly, Prager still calls those who transition to women as men. Buddy Valastro was in trouble calling that and had to be educated by LGBTQ.
@boomerang89092 жыл бұрын
Fourthly, I may have missed it, but in this video, Dan initially talked about women transitioning to men, hence trans-men. The video with Prager was about the opposite direction.
@ogbuzzy19743 жыл бұрын
I'm a life long conservative, and Bill hit this one on the head. The tone of this is what pisses people are.
@xaspirate80603 жыл бұрын
And it has never been so distinct as it is right now with these hard Left pols plus Squad Gals and a Dem party that is way too far left. So condescending so often = sickening. That being said, in many ways so many of the basic Alt-Right types had it coming.
@jleisner19743 жыл бұрын
Just because Bill SAYS there's a tone, that doesn't make it true, and complaints about tone can fuck off and to the left- especially from Conservatives. Bill showed us that fear of learning something new LOOKS as ignorant as it sounds. "I'm open to learning new things, but it has to be done in a tone that's pleasing to me" is about as Boomer as it gets.
@stevenp23093 жыл бұрын
It is sad though that ppl are willing to vote against their own self interests just because they don't like the tone of a message.
@josh182303 жыл бұрын
It's not the tone, it's a lack of reality and insanity, as well as the fact that it completely breaks society that bothers conservatives. I'm not going to go around checking people's pro nouns, I'm not going to call a woman a man or vice versa if I know who they are, it's just not going to happen. I don't care what tone you use to try to get me to change my mind, you'll get the same response.
@candyjohnson33023 жыл бұрын
What pisses rethugliKKKons off is that they can’t control EVERYONE.
@rachelobrien96603 жыл бұрын
0 seconds ago It’s incorrect to generalize the belief of two-spirited to all Native Americans. Some tribes do believe this and have for generations. Many tribes DO NOT incorporate two-spirited people into their beliefs, and have strong ideals about the roles of men and women. It’s a part of their culture and they recognize that men and women are created by God differently to serve an equally important role. I feel many people use natives as a way to push their own political and personal agendas, particularly in this area, without really understanding the native people and their beliefs. What he is stating is misleading and fundamentally false.
@low_vibration3 жыл бұрын
They're racist so all tribes are the same to them
@Jaserocks23 жыл бұрын
It's a perversion of what two spirit means. Just like the greek concept of anima and animus.
@martinacosta38213 жыл бұрын
But still, regarless if it is just part that incorparate that word, it is a native word, isnt? So they are still right
@rachelobrien96603 жыл бұрын
@@martinacosta3821 It is a generalization of Native Americans. So it is incorrect.
@martinacosta38213 жыл бұрын
@@rachelobrien9660 yes and no, regarless of generalization it is still a native saying, what else were they gonna say?
@marthacanady94413 жыл бұрын
This whole ludicrous discussion makes me realize that they are living in a parallel universe. theater of the absurd. Just think there are people taking all this in as serious. Scary.
@Nico_Conradie3 жыл бұрын
Many of them. Many like Maher just pretend to for the money.
@samcharlie77243 жыл бұрын
I rewatched 3x and still don't get it. I studied biology and chemistry, and I'm still confused. Or is my brain blocking out information due to overload. Too much change!?
@therebellion69112 жыл бұрын
@@samcharlie7724 Your not the one that's confused. Dont worry about it.
@bobjames19923 жыл бұрын
This level of inclucivity in language is getting out of hand. The group's we all have to account for are getting more and more with fewer and fewer members. One day this will reduce down to groups the size of one and we shall all start to treat everyone as an individual. What a novel idea.
@gavinm44663 жыл бұрын
You’re spot on💯
@markdouglas16013 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson makes this point. The logical conclusion of intersectionality is the individual.
@alienkid3 жыл бұрын
It's gonna a evolve into everyone just calling each other by their name🤣
@Ameborl3 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha true
@vaibhavmukherjee98303 жыл бұрын
@Mahi Bhai thats kinda dumb. Thats how it was before the periodic table, but separating them into more classes is better for society. It doesn't hurt anyone really. And I'm not saying that unknowingly misgendering someone is an issue but if someone tells you what they want you to call them, just listen to them.
@NaNa-lt1po3 жыл бұрын
Abortion law.. and we end up arguing about spirits ?? Focus.. if you want to win this ..
@someperson99993 жыл бұрын
A part of me thinks it's too late because of the way all this crap is framed. Identity politics has made the progressive movement radioactive to the moderates that are needed to be won over.
@michalsiporski89673 жыл бұрын
Haha actually really good point xD
@josh182303 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the communist wing of your party is going to break up Democrats long before Republicans ever see that type of rift.
@claiminglight3 жыл бұрын
@@someperson9999 Count me in on that. I was punk in high school. I still am. But a chunk of the world went total psycho, redrew the whole spectrum, and now 'not-crazy' is moderate by default.
@LazarheaD3 жыл бұрын
Bill should call out this. WTF is with the spirits talk? Is the left now more religious and anti-science than the right?
@AmasaTony819473 жыл бұрын
I just heard about “two spirit” for the first time also. However Dan Savage and his unnamed colleague administered a very effective correction. I agree completely with the notion that some liberals are condescending, scolding, self-righteous and too eager to identify with the latest “in” phraseology that would have us decontaminate everything we say lest they’re be a “microagression” (god I hate that word and others of the same ilk). But I, like Dan, don’t use that vocabulary and have no desire to scold over “right speech”. I don’t think I’m the only liberal who feels that way.
@correypeta2 жыл бұрын
Well, you've probably never heard of "Two Spirit" because it is a term that only Natives should be using. It does not apply to non-Natives and so for Dan Savage to be using it in his argument is appropriation at its finest.
@sofrshsocln42 жыл бұрын
microaggression is actuality appropriate bc it takes under the racism umbrella. the cluelessness of some ignorant ppl and how they continue such harmful or ridiculous notions and then act offended or get defensive when called out. No it'snot OK in a professional setting to simply claim you're a dark as a BP bc you have a tan. Imagine the death by 1000 cuts idea. that's why they have the "micro" part. Bc over time that ish builds up and is the WORST of your in the receiving end of it, hearing it in your daily life activities, and now in studiously songs you're supposed to continue to take it? nope
@ikeikeforty Жыл бұрын
"two-spirit" was a term invented in the 1990's, and does not accurately describe pre-columbian native societies.
@theplaylister3 жыл бұрын
And to think that menopausal women never ever even thought of demanding that people say "SOME women menstruate, not all". Since the dawn of time, they would hear about menstruation and just knew it doesn't apply to them without being offended.
@umwha3 жыл бұрын
Bump
@carlyav002 жыл бұрын
Iconic point
@MerryClark2 жыл бұрын
exactly. I don’t see postmenopausal women going out and starting their own identity group but I’m sure there is one they’re just not yelling that loud
@Nofurtherquestions2 жыл бұрын
because post menopausal women are still women. only men get offended as they feel threatened
@criswebb74702 жыл бұрын
SWISH. It's because they're not self-obsessed dudes.
@casbot713 жыл бұрын
A better argument for AOC would be it also affects men in that _men (and teenage boys) are forced to become fathers due to contraceptive failure._
@drsnova73133 жыл бұрын
I would say it's good to point out that it also affects trans men, because that's rarely in the conversation of it, but yes, you are right, that is also a good point.
@si913 жыл бұрын
An important corollary to this is that abortion denies men and teenage boys who want to become fathers the opportunity to do so, because they get no choice in the matter of the abortion. Conversely, men who don't want to become fathers are still forced to pay child support whether they wanted the pregnancy or not. Thus women's "reproductive rights" are actually a male issue, because women get all the choice, and men get none, but they do get obligation.
@MikeyDiL3 жыл бұрын
@@si91 wow...lots of male toxicity in this comment 🙄
@MikeyDiL3 жыл бұрын
@@si91 😉 well done sir or ma'am (wouldn't want to assume your gender). But do note, the left will not do well with your logic. They will shift the argument to women's rights. But conveniently leave out 2/3 of the story. The child's right and the father's rights.
@MrRecrute3 жыл бұрын
@@MikeyDiL, an embryo or a foetus is not a child, it’s forming into a child. Get educated.
@oneirishpoet3 жыл бұрын
One of the few times I agree with Bill Maher, Democrats should not make a huge deal of these trans issues when there are much more important things to be focused on
@brianloper66692 жыл бұрын
What? Why not? Why not direct this ay Republicans who have introduced hundreds of bills restricting trans rights in this country just this year?
@jcolinmizia91612 жыл бұрын
There’s an old phrase: don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Yes, trans people should be included in the issues, but don’t let being completely inclusive derail the abortion debate.
@itbizint6112 жыл бұрын
I've never seen a minority so small hijack every issue with such ease as trans people do. Maybe billionaires...
@patriciamartine54102 жыл бұрын
The democrats are likely to lose the election to a MAGA maggot over this trans nonsense. They need to fight to win with issues that are actually important.
@criswebb74702 жыл бұрын
Trans issues affect SUCH a tiny minority of people ... but they get a ridiculous amount of play from Dems using them as, like ... idk, virtue signaling? It's annoying. I feel like it's very alienating to people too because if you're not 100% Woke about every little thing they act like you're a troglodyte that needs to stay in your cave come voting time. No wonder Roe got overturned.
@Anythingelse1253 жыл бұрын
I love how only the elites on tv (on both sides) talk about how “divided” we are, yet almost every average person I know has multiple friends with lots of different political opinions and they get along just fine. At this point I’m convinced every celebrity and tv personality is just rooting for this “divide” by talking about it constantly
@alejandrorivera61223 жыл бұрын
it could be, but we also have to consider that talking in a friendly environment is radically distinct to conduct an idea into the political sphere.
@iamkatdali19613 жыл бұрын
Omg yes I said this too when I deleted social media I noticed how no body ever is triggered in real life and acts pretty rational it seems to only be on social media
@5amiann3 жыл бұрын
Lucky you. Millions are tribalized.
@Raptor3023 жыл бұрын
Yes, because that's how they make their money.
@BryonLetterman3 жыл бұрын
You're exactly right. I voted for Trump twice and my girlfriend didn't vote for him. She voted for Hillary and then Biden. But we're still great
@dfwherbie88143 жыл бұрын
There’s so few transmen and even fewer who want to get pregnant. Including them when talking about a mostly woman issue reminds me of the “all lives matter” response to BLM
@nicolecorry24183 жыл бұрын
That's exactly how I thought of it when listening.
@DrakonR3 жыл бұрын
All lives do matter.
@zeffey2123 жыл бұрын
@@DrakonR Except yours.
@DrakonR3 жыл бұрын
@@zeffey212 We know. No room for white lives for today's progressives. Lol.
@LoneWulf2783 жыл бұрын
Good point. 🤔
@TheOldWeigh3 жыл бұрын
Love my Two Spirited friends. Brandy and Whiskey.
@mahikiya06633 жыл бұрын
Lol
@SparkyKev3 жыл бұрын
The audience feeling too scared to laugh… I felt that.
@xaspirate80603 жыл бұрын
I think Dan had a lot of his people in the crowd tonight.
@itsmeprasad19873 жыл бұрын
It’s almost a taboo… to talk about
@CorneliusCody3 жыл бұрын
Or the audience realizes that it’s not something you claro about? It’s a deep, complex issue. Sometimes, listening and supporting is the appropriate response.
@itsmeprasad19873 жыл бұрын
@Cornelius Cody yep… you are right
@jamesmccallum67703 жыл бұрын
Bill always makes his audience scarred that they won't laugh at the right time, or whether they should be clapping instead of laughing. You can see it in all his shows now and it's become very distracting.
@sianais3 жыл бұрын
Anybody else scared about the sort of conversations we'll be seeing in ten years when this is the new baseline for normal?
@elirivera38803 жыл бұрын
2 late in some places it already is
@KRashad6 ай бұрын
THAT PART
@bluehand96313 жыл бұрын
Oh for joy, I just learned the meaning of a new politically mandatory correct term.
@frederf32273 жыл бұрын
It's treating people with respect gone mad!
@zeffey2123 жыл бұрын
@@frederf3227 Nah, not everyone deserves my total respect just for existing. It's not my responsibility to be walking on eggshells every time I interact with a member of a "victimized class".
@kigen64003 жыл бұрын
@@zeffey212 I'm proud of you for saying this.
@TagSpamCop3 жыл бұрын
Delete. Delete, delete, delete.
@mcsinnin64733 жыл бұрын
This sounds like I'm watching a game of Dungen and Dragons. "My Trans-elf uses Two-spirt!" "My lesbian-cis-Ork defends the attack using Rachel-Maddow genderless-bathroom pass!"
@veddiinspires3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂. You and me, both. Dude.
@DT-bp2om3 жыл бұрын
Lololol
@Grande793 жыл бұрын
They themselves pretend not to be confused.
@rogerrogerson12323 жыл бұрын
What a joke segment that was
@Nico_Conradie3 жыл бұрын
Feels like a Monty Python skit. or something out of South Park
@estill2733 жыл бұрын
I’m sure Mr. Savage levitated off of the stage when the show was over. Neanderthal actions like walking have to be beneath his enlightened sensibilities.
@Deathdemort3 жыл бұрын
Its worth mentioning that the term “two-spirit” is actually not non-controversial amongst the Indigenous either. People keep saying the idea of the gender spectrum and fluidity has always been with humanity and that we should get over it, but the truth is a LOT more complicated than that. Its not that easy to willy nilly compare cultural phenomena from very different cultures who hold differing axioms. Talk about freaking cultural appropriation. This is just using Indigenous cultures (for there are many) for the political stock of a nasty section of the far-left.
@melsop543 жыл бұрын
They don't expect their base to do an ounce of research like this tho. They simply say the sky is green, and it is unquestionably green from that point on. They say the ground doesn't exist, and the ground just ceases to exist at that moment for them. That's the mindset of the "vote blue no matter who". There's no thinking, no growing, no individual ideas. You vote one color, forever. Quite creepy and definitionally cult like.
@tharveytucker13 жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? Two spirit people have been around for ages. That’s just fact. It’s non controversial because it’s a thing, whether you or some natives like it or not. There are many other cultures who have similar non binary genders. There’s no appropriation here. I don’t see anyone claiming to be two spirited who isn’t native. The whole reason it’s pointed out is two fold. One, it’s been a thing here in the americas since the beginning- so it’s not new. Which many are freaking out over trans people as though it’s some new thing. Two, nearly all cultures have a form of non binary gender(s) in their culture. Some may not be welcoming to it, but it’s still a thing.
@noktilux40523 жыл бұрын
@@tharveytucker1 Can you give me some statistics and be precise about which native people? My people in my part of what is now called Canada don't have this tradition. Which tribe are you part of?
@imam14ma3soom19942 жыл бұрын
@@tharveytucker1 We all know that. Even without the native American culture, we already knew that some women had male characteristics (tomboy) and the other way around (metrosexual). These terms have been around in our culture as well. What IS new however, is that having these qualities suddenly affect which gender you are. Or there being a third gender. Scientifically, there is no basis for non-binarity. There's intersex, but those people (and their genitals) usually lean either towards one sex or the other. There's also trans, but here you identify as a person with the opposite sex. Other cultures might have different conceptions in how they perceive genders but most people are not familiar with them. Which is normal.
@yukisuperstylish2 жыл бұрын
@@noktilux4052 the guy in the video didn’t even give Bill his resources nor the tribe lol
@DrStrangeBrew3 жыл бұрын
When Dan Savage was explaining the rules. I felt like I was listening to a dungeon master making up arbitrary rules that we're going to change as the journey went on.
@noktilux40523 жыл бұрын
In trying to come up with a good analogy a little earlier, that is pretty much exactly what came to mind.
@benp48773 жыл бұрын
Yep
@charlenejohnson3093 жыл бұрын
@@benp4877 Ignorance about politics and failure to understand the negative ramifications of laws that affect one segment of society significantly that are being introduced and passed by groups that represent self-interest seem to be connected. Wait til these unwanted, forced pregnancies begin to impact your small world due to death of pregnant women, issues of bleeding or death due to nontreatment of incomplete spontaneous abortions, death/neglect of unwanted children and criminalization of those who support women who want to terminate pregnancy. Gloat now. If this isn't turned around, you won't be prepared when even more rights are erased overnight and sanctioned by a less than stellar Supreme Court. You are not safe from unfettered political power.
@user-co9jn6ec8n3 жыл бұрын
@@charlenejohnson309 Just take a red pill and you don’t have to worry about all the mental illness on the left
@charlenejohnson3093 жыл бұрын
@@user-co9jn6ec8n Your chosen KZbin name says it all. You can't get pregnant, you have no right forcing strangers to have babies.
@marklewen93843 жыл бұрын
" its getting to the point where you cant call them chicks with dix anymore....you have to call them GUYS, who talk too much"- a jeselnik
@olipop843 жыл бұрын
These guys are ridiculous. Props to Bill Maher, who is trying to shine light on it.
@sterlingforbes38723 жыл бұрын
You know the left has gone extreme, when Bill himself is like WTF???
@rp77733 жыл бұрын
Overton windows shift over time - by nowadays' standards, Bill is comfortably centre-left (if not centrist) tbh
@o77eh3 жыл бұрын
@@rp7773 He is pro-DNC, so center is as left as he can go. No liberals exist in either Right wing party.
@dangerousdiscourse3 жыл бұрын
@@o77eh I'd say 30-40% of the right wing, would have been considered liberal 10 years ago..
@o77eh3 жыл бұрын
@@dangerousdiscourse Who? The DNC stopped being a liberal party in 1976. Bernie Sanders and AoC sure, but they then betrayed their constituents. I can't think of anyone else I would describe as Liberal.
@dangerousdiscourse3 жыл бұрын
@@o77eh .. u said there are no liberals in the right wing, i said there is. Then you said the left have no liberals, arnt u agreeing with me?
@clootscalhoun94813 жыл бұрын
As someone who is very pro-choice, I totally agree that the main issue is that women’s access to abortions is being threatened. I think this whole issue with preposterous wording takes away from the main issue to satisfy a small number of social justice warriors who are more interested in getting the exact intersectional adjectives right.
@cobes113 жыл бұрын
Very pro-choice? Does that mean that you are also on-board with the growing support for a woman to be able to choose “post-birth abortion”?
@MMAGamblingTips3 жыл бұрын
@@cobes11 Lol there is no such thing. You can’t murder a child after giving birth to it. I mean, where do you come up with these things? No doctor is going to perform such an act.
@aarons.21803 жыл бұрын
Exactly. And now trying to make it look like abortion is a topic about transsexuality… to everyone who might have an on the fence position about it, it‘s going to be so much more relatable now, of course.
@christinebenson5183 жыл бұрын
@INevaFreeze That's untrue, half of women who get abortions were using other forms of contraception that failed. Fun fact: most abortions are natural aka miscarriages that happen before a woman knows she's pregnant.
@jeffreysytsma65413 жыл бұрын
@@christinebenson518 Unless the woman purposely miscarried, I don't see how you can equate that to aborting the baby, as aborting is an action one purposely takes.
@Notalloldpeople3 жыл бұрын
Why frame an argument about a law which adversely affects 1000 of pregnant women about a very small percentage of people who don’t identify as women but could get pregnant? You will turn off more much needed support than you gain in the pursuit of purity politics. A better argument would be about the impact it has i men as well as the carriers of the pregnancy
@a526003b3 жыл бұрын
Bingo! Been saying this for YEARS
@TheFeldhamster3 жыл бұрын
This should be emphasized more. Eg. the husband or boyfriend who loses his wife / girlfriend because doctors needed to wait with abortion in health related cases. Because look at that law, if it's "only" really high risk, that's not enough to allow the abortion. The woman needs to be basically croaking right now. And these cases end up often enough like the case in Ireland which then started their shift towards allowing abortions. I'm European, I've actually known what two spirit is since the early 90s because I have LGBTQ people in my family and they were pretty activist, so they knew a lot about other culture's concepts of being trans etc. But I think framing it this way was a tactical mistake by AOC. Those that still need convincing that this law is bad need to identify with the people it will hurt. They need to think "uh, this could happen to myself / my family". These folks typically pretend trans or enby people don't exist or are mentally ill. You don't win them over this way, you scare them off. It's bad advertising and a bad argument. It's a tactical mistake, even though what she said is totally factually correct. And even though how Bill reacted to it was just stupid. He should have ripped her for making the argument badly, not played pretend dumb about not knowing how trans men can still have a uterus and uuuh, he's such an ally but "what is this silly two spirit stuff". Like he doesn't have the resources to have someone research it for him for the show. Not a good look, Bill.
@hopedamon71163 жыл бұрын
I, for one, am tired of coddling men and Bible thumpers. I'm not here to educate you. I'm here for my constitutional rights, Dammit! Bible thumpers don't want these things taught in school. They don't want to be educated on sex and different lifestyles. They don't want real history to be taught. So I say, stay ignorant. But don't fuck with others people's right.
@a526003b3 жыл бұрын
@@hopedamon7116 what constitutional rights are you speaking of? I’m an atheist however I’m not interested in being “educated” about “menstruating people” and child birth. Let’s start at the beginning… are gender and sex independent of each other? If so then I couldn’t care less about your gender. This entire subject is where “the party of science” goes full anti-biology.
@Illlium3 жыл бұрын
You boys ever heard a magical thing called contraception? Abortion should be legal only if paternity surrender is also legal.
@smisanko3 жыл бұрын
"The founding fathers would be canceled for good reasons? Dude, they put forth the best effort for individual liberty and justice that They could at the time with the norms of the era. Perfect by their own or even our standards? No. But sure as shit better than anything you could ever achieve. They fought and defeated the greatest military of the time and developed a thriving nation for generations to come. If you win this culture war, congrats. You'll be noted in history as one of the rare humans who achieves much by moving us backwards.
@ivanvoronov38713 жыл бұрын
Exactly, the fact that as a gay man his rights are protected by law is because of the founding father's
@deerobinson5573 жыл бұрын
@@ivanvoronov3871 You two are a perfect examples of how bad schools are in America. The founding fathers were not trying to give anyone freedom, unless you were a white guy who owned land. They didn't even give white woman freedom to have a voice in this country.
@deerobinson5573 жыл бұрын
Stefan Paul Misanko, how did the founding fathers do their best for individual liberty, when they excluded everyone who wasn't a white man. Almost all Native tribes gave their women every right that a man had. Women were the head of the household in most tribes, they had a voice in government, and no one in the tribe tried to tell their women how to think or act period. Oh and the founding father's stole the way our government was set up, from the Iroquois Nation.
@deerobinson5573 жыл бұрын
@@ivanvoronov3871 the founding fathers would have put to death anyone they thought was gay.
@DominicNJ733 жыл бұрын
@@deerobinson557 You should stop learning history from Twitter and Tumblr, you're embarrassing yourself with your complete lack of understanding of the issues and hurdles the founding father's went through to achieve what they did. For instance, the majority of them wanted to disallow slavery in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution but they were blocked by the southern colonies, so they had to negotiate and agreed to visit the issue of slavery after the Revolutionary War and the ratifying of the Constitution.
@OceanluvOC3 жыл бұрын
Never heard of two spirit until now 🤷🏼♀️
@hustler3of4culture33 жыл бұрын
@@stepfaniehawkins205 but it was like a third gender, no?
@twiztedsynz3 жыл бұрын
@@hustler3of4culture3 Some tribes consider Two Spirit a 'third gender', yeah. It's basically one body but both male/female spirits in that one body. IMO it could blanket term not just Trans people but Gender Fluid people as well since the only difference between the two is Gender Fluid don't normally have the horrible dysphoria that Trans people sometimes have. We acknowledge we're a "base" gender, but we've also feelings and sensations of the other as well.
@hustler3of4culture33 жыл бұрын
@@twiztedsynz yeah that was essentially my understanding. Thank you for clarifying.
@hustler3of4culture33 жыл бұрын
@@twiztedsynz did two spirit people usually take the role of shaman? That's another thing I heard long ago, but I'm no longer sure if that's true.
@josh182303 жыл бұрын
Congratulations for never looking at Twitter, reddit, or Tumblr then.
@politicalorphan3 жыл бұрын
"Don't talk politics with me, just talk." Awesome
@josh182303 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that is one thing people have forgotten how to do if they have gotten into that rabbit hole, I'm guilty of it as well.
@pro-choicemom3 жыл бұрын
You're asking people to reason with bigots, racist, religious lunatics& misogynists. I live among them...they're irredeemable. You try talking to my moron neighbors.
@politicalorphan3 жыл бұрын
@@pro-choicemom no, we suggest you talk to them. If you truly believe that you're surrounded by people who think the way you've described, then maybe you're the problem, and not so much them
@pro-choicemom3 жыл бұрын
@@politicalorphan Of course, people who want to take away civil rights from my gay friends & family- oh they're such sweethearts. People who think the gov't should force women & girls to remain pregnant against their will are wonderful. Gtfoh. These morons think evolution shouldn't be taught in schools. Bill Maher & the other idiots going around claiming we have to be nice to bigots really aren't talking to the Trump cultists who have shoot to kill signs on their front yards. They talk to rich conservatives or people who just want tax cuts. He doesn't talk to the scum people that live in red states.
@pro-choicemom3 жыл бұрын
@@politicalorphan It's amazing bigots must be listened to but those fighting against them are the problem. You're a real POS.
@dtchinacat39733 жыл бұрын
I agree with Bill: it's "Mainly" a Women's issue. The percentage of Trans that this would effect is "SO LOW" it's a "Biological Women's" issue!
@hustler3of4culture33 жыл бұрын
Trans men are biological women
@BenDover-ij7yp3 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's a women's issue at it's core, because the question at it's core is, up to what point development and under what circumstances, is it ok, to end the life of the fetus? Almost no one believes in abortions up to childbirth.
@collydub19873 жыл бұрын
@@hustler3of4culture3 so you see absolutely no difference between a female who was born with a uterus, and a pre op trans person who was born male?
@thelaughingfoxx3 жыл бұрын
Saying that it’s a women’s issue is still true! Doesn’t that include trans men?? Why the fuck are we offended by this?
@hustler3of4culture33 жыл бұрын
@@collydub1987 that's not what this is about.
@ippolit233 жыл бұрын
It’s dawning on Bill he’s been on the wrong side of the fence for most of the time.
@reznof20113 жыл бұрын
You can see how worried he is about saying something they won’t like.
@praketak473 жыл бұрын
@@reznof2011 It's empathy, sensitivity. He wants to be more informed. He is not afraid to be 100% strong worded when needed.
@mtkoslowski3 жыл бұрын
Oh, FFS. Enough with all the politically correct *DOUBLESPEAK.* Will every normal person stand with me please?
@ridetillidie80903 жыл бұрын
Can you define 'normal' for us?
@jonathanmol44893 жыл бұрын
I thought normal was just a cycle on my washing machine?
@Rayzersword3 жыл бұрын
If you think there's such a thing as a normal person, you are severely undereducated. You clearly don't understand anything about Orwell, so please stop using words coined by him incorrectly.
@9747243 жыл бұрын
Yes
@Rayzersword3 жыл бұрын
Just so you know, the bad guys of 1984, I.e. the ones who used "doublespeak", outlawed homosexuality. If they existed, they would be on your side.
@jeremygibson5653 жыл бұрын
Dan savage thinks he’s brilliant. At least someone does.
@cooldrop023 жыл бұрын
Smarter than you. And I didn't even agree with everything he said here. ;p
@BarbaPamino3 жыл бұрын
@@cooldrop02 do you know this Jeremy fella from somewhere else or are you basing it on one comment on KZbin? Even still. It's not a prerequisite to be brilliant yourself in order to recognize someone else isn't. Any more than it is a pretty be a phenomenal athlete in order to gauge that a professional athlete isn't all that exceptional compared to his or her peers. Dan Savage is a professional opinion giver and in that realm of opinion givers he's pretty low on the list. He'll be easily forgotten about by future generations and nothing he ever said or wrote will matter. Thus, he's not brilliant.
@cooldrop023 жыл бұрын
@@BarbaPamino Well, based on the comment itself, he seems pretty simple. To comment on someone else's intelligence when they are the ones speaking eloquently, and also not conveying any ill will towards anyone as they do so, wow simultaneously giving concise information that is true in fact checkable, is indicative of someone with a low IQ. Because I know this gentleman does not know Dan in person. He doesn't know that person.
@cooldrop023 жыл бұрын
@@BarbaPamino They also made an assumption that he, the person speaking, thinks that he is something. That goes far beyond reading someone's comment, which is an action, and goes into the realm of being a mind reader. Which is something no human is capable of. Which, again, is indicative of someone with a low IQ. Also someone with an inability to self-reflect. Thank you for your candor homie.
@cooldrop023 жыл бұрын
@@BarbaPamino because if we're talking about the topic at hand. He didn't give an opinion. He gave an undeniable fact of the reality that is what the tweet itself referenced. If you can't comprehend that then, that's on you. If you think he is not brilliant cool. However I said that he is smarter than him. So you can argue against a strong man that both of you seem to want to hump, together.
@erikt17133 жыл бұрын
When it comes to reproductive rights, the term "women" has always included a large number of female children as well, which is a group of particular concern for abortion. So we would have had to say "women and girls" to be very accurate. If some trans men are still covered within their original sex in regards to reproductive rights it is also just a simplification, but for a far smaller number of people.
@72marshflower153 жыл бұрын
Sexual predation is self obsessive ie individualistic and individualism sources conservatism. Thing is, no one is conservative or liberal per se, but rather we tend to embody characteristics of either or at any given time. Which one reigns depends on which is fed the most. In individualistic culture, sexual predation will run rampant. When a man doesn’t care for his parter so much as he cares for his nut..
@brettcrook93623 жыл бұрын
@@72marshflower15 sexual predation is rampart in extreme leftists groups. Predators target these groups as the members are reluctant to report such crimes to “the enemy” they are trying to overthrow. Predators go where they have access to victims. In the past that has been church institutions, boarding schools, scout and guide troops. Now those hunting grounds are on “high alert” so are no longer as favourable. However with the rise of “Safe Schools Programs”, Critical Gender Theory promotion and exploration of sexuality encouraged the predators will be increasingly attracted to schools. Having said all that. Most sexual attacks occur within an extended family setting. The victim and predator are known to each other. 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 6 boys are victims. So 25% of the population. If 1% of those kids are traumatised that’s 0.25% of the population. Maybe this goes a long way to explaining the origins of a large portion of the LGBTIQP population. I can’t see how you make the claim it is rampart in individualistic conservative culture. Gay pride and North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) are very left and liberal and had their origins in the 1960 s sexual revolution. So I’m call bs on your comment.
@72marshflower153 жыл бұрын
1) “sexual predation is rampant in extreme leftist groups” Response) ~ for starters, extremism is to conservatism as radical is to liberal. It means you’re not even pairing sources to their proxies correctly. Secondly, you’re so desperate to defend your id/ego that you’ll defend anything that challenges the premise that you build your id/ego on. Technically, harming others for individual gain/likeness is individualistic ie conservative as caring for others is collective ie liberal. It means that, objectively speaking, all theft, sexual predation and killing is self obsessive ie individualistic and (again) individualism sources conservatism.. I was actually trafficked as child. You’ve no right to speak to this end. The reason that there are dozens of genders is due to individualism, ie self obsession.. “What am I?” Tell you what.. you’re more than an individual..
@somethingclever89163 жыл бұрын
They need to drop women issue label altogether to be more inclusive and just say its about personal freedom and right to health care and leave it at that.
@erikt17133 жыл бұрын
@@somethingclever8916 - If you include girls as women (to be), then women still make up 100% of pregnant people. I rounded it to full percentage points there without decimals. It must be permitted to refer to the total by its almost exclusive majority. In addition, pregnancy is not an illness, so abortion is not literally health care. It is important for personal freedom, though, I agree with you there.
@bath_neon_classical2 жыл бұрын
abortion is an issue that affects men, but it's a lot harder for women
@bentalaska49203 жыл бұрын
The irony of this segment is that Dennis Prager was laughed off when he brought up ‘men can menstruate’ 2 years ago. And now they’re having a serious discussion about it.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
Yes, that is unfortunate. And Ronan Farrow laughed it off too (in the segment you're talking about), only to imply soon after that JK Rowling was transphobic for saying women menstruate
@rogerrogerson12323 жыл бұрын
I know. What a crazy nut bag, tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist. (maybe Dennis Prager and Niki Minaj should get a room together the right wing white supremasits) /s
@almuhaarib3 жыл бұрын
Fucking this.
@greglinsmythe33753 жыл бұрын
Women menstruate, men don’t.
@a526003b3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely hilarious! So true!
@tonyrock53133 жыл бұрын
it's also a family issue. An extra child or fetus that will be disabled will be a burden on some families.
@ridetillidie80903 жыл бұрын
That's why I've been advocating physical, genetic, mental and monetary screening prior to being GRANTED a license to breed, since the 70s. Makes me the bad guy but just think if we started ignoring the idiot religious and made sure people were capable of having and raising children?
@GiarkReleos3 жыл бұрын
@@ridetillidie8090 your Fascism is not welcome here, that is why conservatives are going the way of the Dodo bird. Facts Matter !!
@tonyrock53133 жыл бұрын
@@ridetillidie8090 What are you a damn Nazi!?You are one step from the practice of killing the ,what you call, the undesirable.
@breadmoth64433 жыл бұрын
@@ridetillidie8090 so.... you are pro - eugenics - since that is essentially what eugenics is.
@ridetillidie80903 жыл бұрын
@@breadmoth6443 Wow. Thanks for proving my point. NO, I am not. I am pro-responsible breeding instead of random irresponsible breeding, as is anyone with the ability to critically use logic and reason. In other words, pretty much nobody in this thread. I can tell you are unable to wrap your head around the idea and come to logical, reasoned conclusions, so, I'll just stop here and let you wriggle around in your cheetos thinking you're clever.
@HorrorBorealis3 жыл бұрын
Love how the trans are trying to erase women and female experiences. so inclusive and feminist!
@v-town19802 жыл бұрын
Love how feminists and females ignore the misandristic agenda most of their so-called justices include. What a bunch of entitled, unhappy schmucks.
@HorrorBorealis2 жыл бұрын
@@v-town1980 say it again in english this time.
@stephenvierling22872 жыл бұрын
The fact that this conversation is taking place makes me have less hope for society. The fact that there are people that think men can be women and vice versa is scary.
@AlexM-ht9ff2 жыл бұрын
learn science, bigot
@IsraelCountryCube2 жыл бұрын
Time to kill some!
@stephenvierling22872 жыл бұрын
@@AlexM-ht9ff I would say everyone on this panel needs to learn science.
@lucasharvey89902 жыл бұрын
@@stephenvierling2287 Well I would say that you need to face the facts, since your science is wrong. What you've got under your pants isn't the only thing that determine gender. Imagine the manliest guy you can, like Arnold Schwartzeneggar or whatever, then imagine they had a vagina. They'd then fall in the murky waters of somewhere in between male and female - where they have all the characteristics of being a man, but they don't have the male sex organ. So what do you call them then? Man? Woman? It's a really unnerving question for those who do face these sorts of problems. These people often force themselves to pick a side and if they have money they can go through surgery to make it a little more "official." Others don't pick a side, and just decide to stay in-between. This is happening to millions of people throughout the Western World, and it is woefully irresponsible and childish to pretend they are all nutcases or whatever. You should take them seriously instead of belittling them. If you woke up tomorrow and what you've got under your pants magically got switched to the opposite, then how would you handle it? Would you still be guy, or would you be a woman then?
@azspotfree3 жыл бұрын
Ms Tett is wildly obsessed with the word tribe
@Jamakaya13 жыл бұрын
You're missing the forest for the trees. Her comments at the end were very incisive and compassionate.
@alkismavridis13 жыл бұрын
1:12 How on earth can transition to male? I thought that gender is the social aspect and sex was the immutable biological one. Aren't trans men females? How about abortion is a female issue? The more I look at the trans issue, the more the looks like semantic games. And semantic games are fine. What it not fine is claiming that people who play different semantic games are "biggots". Even more uncool is to keep changing your semantic games every 5 years, and call biggots the ones who still play the previous one.
@fromireland86633 жыл бұрын
Well, because of hormonal treatment, surgery and because they feel that they are male. That is how I understand it. Correct me if I am wrong? However, good point about it changing every 5 years and people being unfairly called out for not keeping up. I believe that, in the UK, there are now over 100 gender identities recognised. I still feel that gender at birth should be distinguished from gender identity, primarily for medical reasons.
@alkismavridis13 жыл бұрын
@@fromireland8663 the way I see it is still a semantic question. Instead of saying that people changed their sex, we could be more flexible about what sex identifications are. We could say that is, that the genitalia and hormonal interventions simply proove that "some males have vaginas" and "some males have different hormonal makeup". Of course these are outliers to the majority, but this is the case anyways, no matter what semantcs you choose. Same thing, different semantics. We could even use the same terms for gender for goodness shake. Instead of calling them trans men, we could be more flexible about what womanhood is. Some women dress like this, talk like this and even modify their bodies in this way. And they are still women. Same phenomenon, different wording. Of course, self identification would also follow the same semantics because hey, these people also use language to think about themselves. To me all of the above are equally right, (or equally wrong) ways to speak about the phenomenon. This way I find it to be overwhelmingly a semantic game. Which is fine, until the point where people weaponize it.
@fromireland86633 жыл бұрын
@@alkismavridis1 Do you think that the current state of affairs has arisen because society is too rigid in it's expectation of how make/female should be or behave?
@alkismavridis13 жыл бұрын
@@fromireland8663 yes, I think this is correct. And maybe (just maybe) the semantics that we ended up following reinforces this rigidity.
@PassportToPimlico3 жыл бұрын
@@fromireland8663 I'm sure that a great many people can feel that they are a great many things but that doesn't necessarily make it true.
@bernadettebockis41203 жыл бұрын
'Two spirit' is a term used by Native Americans. They don't prefer it's use as trans. It is to distinguish First Nations people from Non-Native people.
@paulmicheldenverco13 жыл бұрын
I'm not saying "I told you so", I just thought I'd share this in the spirit of helping us know facts about things we didn't know about five minutes ago. Two-Spirit is a modern, pan-Indian, umbrella term used by some Indigenous North Americans to describe Native people in their communities who fulfill a traditional third-gender ceremonial and social role in their cultures. Wikipedia
@otcourtruecitizenshipphil.83863 жыл бұрын
So is this two-Spirit, sybil style or Exorcist Style just asking?
@ethercept3 жыл бұрын
Just try to listen to this conversation without imagining that Earnest Hemingway was a time traveler and this was the last thing he heard before he pulled the trigger.
@dwknick333 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@hggtg2 жыл бұрын
I truly believe this man is mentally deranged!
@shadbakht3 жыл бұрын
What about women who are over 50? They’re not “menstruating people”.
@jennifersadler48703 жыл бұрын
If a person is not menstruating, they will not need an abortion because they cannot get pregnant.
@jhitchcock55033 жыл бұрын
@@jennifersadler4870 and yet we're still women. I don't care who AOC is I don't want her degrading me or my daughters by calling them menstruating people. They are women and so am I, even without my uterus, because I have two X chromosomes.
@michalsiporski89673 жыл бұрын
@@jhitchcock5503 Exactly. This is ridiculous what is going on. If being male or female is determinated by gender (i.e. some stereotypes associated with male or female) then you can say everything is a social construct. We have stereotypes about race or age. Already some people identify with different race like Oli London.
@hazmat19783 жыл бұрын
I love women who are 50+! They don't play games and I don't have to worry about paying Child support! :-)
@Oxbloodmage3 жыл бұрын
@@jennifersadler4870 thus the term makes sense even if you aren't talking about trans men. But anytime they are even referenced someone complains about it. 🤷 I just think bill is full of shit for attacking aoc for doing something he would do every other day of the week on a different issue, like religion, does bill think am I alienating Christians to the democrats by antagonizing them no. 🙄
@bartstarr1003 жыл бұрын
That lady decried tribalism while decrying “those people”
@OmegaMouse3 жыл бұрын
@jon pork Thanks Joh, you just showed that "you people" cannot detect hypocrisy.
@stevem23233 жыл бұрын
@@OmegaMouse You people?
@ashtonwalker38813 жыл бұрын
Congrats Bill, this is your audience now
@brezhou293 жыл бұрын
Amazing isn't it? This bit about the Texas law moves straight away to "what's 2 spirits anyway?". And then the new rules bit is about the Texas law, but mostly... about how snitching on desperate women is exactly like the Jeopardy producer didn't get to also be the host because of something he said in the past. Lots of time spent on the kind of important topic of the Texas law, only at no point it was about this law and its consequences, but about how "things are weird nowadays, aren't they?". This show could easily move to Fox now. Booohoohooo the woke left, boohooo weird gender stuff, booohoohhoo I don't like lockdowns.
@ryanshinermusic3 жыл бұрын
@@brezhou29 If you really think this is conservative, you probably haven't interacted with anyone outside of one far-left bubble for awhile.
@brezhou293 жыл бұрын
@@ryanshinermusic no, not conservative! Libertarian, i.e. conservatives... but with weed and gays!
@ashtonwalker38813 жыл бұрын
@@brezhou29 Yeah I'm confused with your point. This kind of bs debate is what takes place on CNN, MSNBC etc.. not even close to Fox news
@brezhou293 жыл бұрын
@@ashtonwalker3881 this bit starts about the Texas abortion ban, but quickly devolves into "ewww people with weird gender". When the Texas law passed, Fox hardly mentioned it. Just like on this Real Time episode. Sort of reference it in passing but really talks about something else. That's what I'm talking about. The Texas law will lead women to get back alley abortions, like in the good old time. Women will suffer, many will die from the consequences of having an abortion not done in clinic. Seems important? Well... Not to Bill, who's focus is "WHAT THE FUCK IS TWO SPIRITS ANYWAY I NEVER HEARD OF IT" and "AOC said something weird" and in the new rules bit "Snitching on women who needs an abortion is like cancelling a producer hosting a game show". False equivalents, moaning about the woke mob, weird genders and "cancel culture", whilst barely mentioning the actual madness of banning abortions even in case of rape... is what Fox does.
@JoyTb123453 жыл бұрын
I really have found that I agree with Bill on a lot and it shocks me.
@JoyTb123453 жыл бұрын
@@stepfaniehawkins205 hahha thank you🥰
@Oxbloodmage3 жыл бұрын
If this was about religion bill wouldn't agree with himself.
@GiarkReleos3 жыл бұрын
that's because common sense is a trait not found in the lunatic fringe of conservatism. Facts Matter !!
@awesomewxyz70833 жыл бұрын
@@GiarkReleos Yeah those damn conservatives... Why can't they understand that it's okay for men to crack women's skull in MMA? Man I'm glad I'm not a liberal anymore...
@freeindeed84163 жыл бұрын
Yeah because these people are out it
@kellywalsh93733 жыл бұрын
Two Spirit….meaning that they accepted the duality that exists within themselves rather than fight it and try and modify their body into one gender or the other.
@vitaliys3 жыл бұрын
it's called "gender dysphoria". I don't know whether it's treatable or not, but apparently some people suffer it
@whoopshey8263 жыл бұрын
i understood it instantly, its not complicated. I've seriously never heard it until this clip.
@rogerrogerson12323 жыл бұрын
@@vitaliys Perfect Joe will mandate the vaccine now.
@nicksherreard12153 жыл бұрын
@@vitaliys it’s not gender disphoria if you’re using the organ you’re supposedly disphoric about
@TheFeldhamster3 жыл бұрын
I think two spirit is more like what we call genderfluid now, not trans. It was equated with being trans back when we didn't have a word for genderfluid. Or probably the native people used it for both because they just didn't have the means to do that kind of surgery. But "accepting ones duality" sounds a lot more like genderfluid / non binary. The trans people I know don't feel "in the middle" kind of dual, they're more likely "I knew from when I was 5 years old that I was in the wrong body". At least that's what they told me and seeing how difficult it is to transition in my country and they still took it upon them I have no reason to disbelieve them. They meant it.
@iamtheowl96313 жыл бұрын
The fact that this conversation just happened is exactly why I'm voting Republican for the first time in my life next election. I just can't anymore.
@Dialogos19893 жыл бұрын
I think all this confusion could be resolved by separating sex from gender. Just say male or female, nothing to do with identity
@micl65623 жыл бұрын
Its meant to be confusing
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
The whole gender identity movement is predicated on removing and obfuscating sex, particularly anything to do with women's rights. It's highly misogynistic.
@vitaliys3 жыл бұрын
you can't separate sex from gender as of today. One word : DNA, everything else is in your imagination
@hyacinthlynch8433 жыл бұрын
Sex and gender are not disconnected.
@vitaliys3 жыл бұрын
@@hyacinthlynch843 , and till recently it meant the same :))) I have a feeling it's still the same. One can mingle the words anyway they want it doesn't change the scientific facts
@low_vibration3 жыл бұрын
lmao i love how "native americans" is just one homogenous blob as if they werent separated into myriad cultures and tribes
@Willcaballero3 жыл бұрын
I thought the same thing. I've heard two-spirit being tossed around for years now, but still am unsure which exact tribe(s) used this term. Like, did my Taino ancestors down in what's now called Puerto Rico use this term, just like a hypothetical Lakota Native American? Super doubtful...
@shawnnewell45413 жыл бұрын
Not all men who are married want their kids. My former parish priest told us in a sermon once that he'd heard women in tears, during confession, because they were told to abort the baby or they wouldn't be allowed back in the house. I for one was stunned. It really drove home what I'd realized a long time ago it's not just women who want abortion it's men too. I fear more deaths and homelessness will happen as a result of Texas' abortion laws.
@thagodwecreate51793 жыл бұрын
I am personally against abortion. And 2 years ago I met a girl and accidentally got her pregnant in 1 month. I never wanted kids and neither did she so she left the decision to me...I now have a 1 year old daughter i love so so much so my money's where my mouth is. Though this is my personal choice, I don't feel I have the right to take that decision from others. I support first trimester, there should be limits and restrictions but obviously taking it from the black market, back alley route is safer for everyone. Fun Fact: I am still with my daughter's mother in a very happy home and i love being a dad...so ya never know where life will take you. I wouldn't have believed it 3 years ago. I'm still def never getting married though. One Love
@xaspirate80603 жыл бұрын
@@thagodwecreate5179 Great post.
@tjhodge2013 жыл бұрын
Shawn I find it difficult to see a priest approve of abortion and that more than likely the women speaking to said priest would receive care for them and the baby...my question is everyone in my church us against abortion cause the death of a defenceless baby...I think you don't go church and your story kinda B.S.
@ViFabulous3 жыл бұрын
@@thagodwecreate5179 1. If you don't want kids, get a vasectomy. Glad you're a content dad now. 2. Most abortions are done in the first trimester or 12 weeks. The TX law defies medical logic and, once again, shows lawmakers don't understand human biology or reproduction. 3. second trimester abortions are often for medical reasons. Either the fetus has issues of viability issue or the mother's health is at stake. The pro-birth movement perpetuates the lies of "Late term abortion." If they really GAF about humans the GOP could go to the Texas border with Mexico, any detention center, any orphanage or foster care system and show they care about humans post birth. However; they choose to sit in judgment of others and say, "You shouldn't have children you can't afford." The GOP has been anti-life by example for over 40 years.
@fromireland86633 жыл бұрын
@@tjhodge201 You misunderstood Shawn's post. You should read it again.
@tigrouthetraveler3 жыл бұрын
This is insane! A transman is not a man, she's a woman who feels like a man. A transwoman is not a woman, he's a man who feels like a woman. Everyone has the right to feel what they want, but pretending that those feelings allows them to really become what they feel is absolutely insane!
@maskedmarvyl47743 жыл бұрын
"Trans two-spirit nonbinary". Do you want that as a soy latte?
@starwarsstuff80983 жыл бұрын
You can tell Bill really wants to smack that guy lol
@raminMTL3 жыл бұрын
What
@Killswitch14113 жыл бұрын
Who wouldn't?? Guy is unbearable.
@Oxbloodmage3 жыл бұрын
What that guy should point out is that bill does what aoc is doing all the time on other issues. He's constantly scolding and intentionally alienating people. 🤷
@Nigerian_Papi3 жыл бұрын
@@Killswitch1411 nah he’s chill, I think bill was just kinda frustrated cause he wasn’t addressing his point
@hyacinthlynch8433 жыл бұрын
@@Killswitch1411 So was the audience.
@Boobalopbop3 жыл бұрын
I am a liberal who loves AOC but what she said really cause me to roll my eyes. Maher is correct. Keep the messaging simple.
@Seasonalable3 жыл бұрын
I wasn't sure these people exist, but here is one. Extraordinary
@musashi.miyamoyo2 жыл бұрын
Do women that have a fetus have two heads, 20 fingers, and 20 toes? Is it really about the women?
@jamesjack70743 жыл бұрын
Bill keeps trying to say things need to be framed in appealing ways for the Right, but a majority of them aren't interested in changing positions on issues like this.
@awesomewxyz70833 жыл бұрын
Yeah cuz when men are being allowed to fight women in MMA, it's not okay. Also if men and women are the same, then what's the point of trans?
@freeindeed84163 жыл бұрын
Men are men
@cobes113 жыл бұрын
You can take a picture of a dog turd from 100 different angles. At the end of the day, it is still shit.
@thirstfen3 жыл бұрын
This was the most confusing conversation I've ever heard 😂😂.
@jacobrivera73023 жыл бұрын
Welcome to American politics...
@johnames64303 жыл бұрын
and absurd as well ridiculous
@maxmustermann95873 жыл бұрын
I found it quite enlightening.
@johnames64303 жыл бұрын
@GAY RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS exactly, there's plenty of gay people who aren't full woke idiots, they just like other men and that's it.
@BM-wh5qk3 жыл бұрын
All they wanted was marriage they said... Now we have to say "two spirit" and not laugh.
@jpkclutch77803 жыл бұрын
I realization I made about 3 months ago is that supporting the legalization of gay marriage was just opening the gates for this crazy radical distorting of reality. Most conservatives won’t admit this, but it was a mistake bc the radical lgbtq activists were never going to settle for just 1 thing. It’s human nature to want more power after you get a taste of it. Power can corrupt anyone and the people who think they otherwise become even more authoritarian.
@kigen64003 жыл бұрын
As an LGBTQ Conservative....both of you said the very thing I always used to fear about Gays having the right to marry. Not out of homophobia or hatred towards my own but, because I know the next generation will cause social mayhem. Because they don't care about basic rights, they want to control people and guilt them for not agreeing with them. It was never about rights.
@strongwolf85343 жыл бұрын
I'm a left leaning centrist. I support gay marriage and the right to be just as miserable as any straight couple because of all the legal crap attatched to the ancient tradition of selling your sexuality in exchange for lifelong social/economic support. But I agree, the social justice croud took this and ran, now they are just as anti-science as anyone on the far right. It's ridiculous.
@reliancepropertyservices82883 жыл бұрын
I thought transgender was somebody who was trapped in the wrong body. 1 soul in the wrong body, the fact the definitions change all the time on this subject is enough for me to call bullshit.
@Undertak20003 жыл бұрын
anyone remember when they laughed at Dennis Prager for suggesting that the left say men menstruate as totally ridiculous? oof.
@Deuteromis3 жыл бұрын
Who
@burdonwilliams3 жыл бұрын
You are correct.
@josh182303 жыл бұрын
@@Deuteromis Shut up and cope.
@iannonya52823 жыл бұрын
Because prager was coming at it from a place of hatred, he deserves to be laughed off of every stage he enters
@breadmoth64433 жыл бұрын
@@iannonya5282 but he was still correct so..........
@breadmoth64433 жыл бұрын
1950s: "Wow I bet in 60 years or so, we will be colonizing the moon!" 2020s: "I don't know what gender I am, and I am non-conforming 2 spirit, non-binary person of color, transracial - unicorn..."
@SilentMott2 жыл бұрын
Sad truth, we used to look at the stars, now all we do is stare at the mirror.
@breadmoth64432 жыл бұрын
@@SilentMott what you are describing is decadence and self-importance - every period in history has had it, but it hasn't been so pronounced as today I suppose. We have all this potential, instead - we are listening to a segment of population that is literally 1% or less, and indulging in their stupidity/fantasies. There is a reason why I agree with the addage: "lunatics running the asylum."
@sevenidols6073 жыл бұрын
I just learned what two spirit is. I learn things on Bill Maher.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
It's also deeply homophobic. It was mostly used to reference towards gay men to imply they weren't man enough...in other words, rigid gender roles.
@JohnWhiteHere3 жыл бұрын
What does it mean? I couldn’t force myself to sit through this nonsense
@landonkare6703 жыл бұрын
Its kinda scary how these new identities(very different from being gay or trans) are getting no push back.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
@@zachhayes9512 The ONLY reason any of them bring up 2 spirit is merely the fact that it's an aspect of non-European culture, and if they can somehow connect their completely different ideology to race, then they can utilize it as a shield for anything. The strict adherence expected for gender ideology within Western culture juxtaposed with the extreme cultural relativism they apply to any non-Western culture is an amazing feat of mental gymnastics...at the highest levels. Nevermind the fact that Iran subsidizes SRS as a means of conversion therapy for gay men who would otherwise be killed there. Nevermind the fact that the main people pushing this ideology are white rich lobbyists. Nevermind the fact that most POC do not support this ideology. So they have to resort to a non-universal idea held by some Native Americans....because no one else believes in it.
@hyacinthlynch8433 жыл бұрын
@@ncorp2668 Spot on. 👍
@tippy1952 жыл бұрын
Having the choice to have an abortion is a FREEDOM
@feralearthworm30443 жыл бұрын
I took off my earbuds before he could explain two spirited, just so I don't have whatever BS that is running around in my head. This crap is getting old.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
Something tells me Dan Savage, a gay man, would not live up to what he says in terms of "transmen" (i.e. females) dating him. It's OK to de-center women out of their own issues, as long as it doesn't effect him personally, right Dan?
@jt76383 жыл бұрын
What is your point? Aesthetic preferences do happen. I do not think he would date certain bears either.
@EastSide-qc5oy3 жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? Are you saying in order for Dan (or any gay man) to be consistent in a belief system that supports trans people, he would have to be open to dating a woman who transitions? Otherwise he’s a hypocrite? If that’s what you are saying, it’s an utterly preposterous statement.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
@@jt7638 Same SEX attraction isn't "aesthetics". You're demonstrating exactly my point about gender identity ideologues and their conflict with gay people.
@jt76383 жыл бұрын
@@ncorp2668 dude. I am not getting into a semantics banter with you. Who you want to date or not is up to you. If you like men and want certain parts you may or may not want to date trans people. If you expect to police that - oh boy! Are you going to really be wasting your time! 😂
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
@@EastSide-qc5oy How's it preposterous that i expect Dan Savage to be consistent in his logic? Either they're men or they aren't. But of course, Dan knows they're not actually men...in terms of what effects HIM. But if it's de-centering women out of their own issues...then all of a sudden it's "mEn gEt pReGnAnT 2!!!" It's absurd. Dan Savage is an absurd man, and he can take his metaphysical gender theism with him.
@MsKim143 жыл бұрын
I've got to agree with Bill Maher here. I respect that people have differing views on abortion, but I don't think that it should be illegal. I think that Texas law is scary, with no exception even for rape. I thought that when AOC was on Anderson Cooper's show she did a good job of explaining how "six weeks pregnant" means that a woman is only two weeks late on her period, so most often the six weeks would have elapsed before a woman even knows she's pregnant. But AOC lost me when she said "pregnant people," etc. Personally, I always thought that the pro-choice argument when I was growing up that "only women can get pregnant" was a powerful one. I do feel that men can never truly understand because it will never happen to them. So unfortunately, feminists are undermining what was a good argument with all of this talk that "not only women can get pregnant." I know that the right is having a field day with it, and it does make people on the pro-choice side look ridiculously out of touch with reality if they are saying that men can get pregnant, too.
@twells1383 жыл бұрын
"And ladies, to be fair to us, I also believe that if you decide to have the baby, a man should not have to pay. That’s fair. If you can kill this motherf---er, I can at least abandon them." - Dave Chappelle
@72marshflower153 жыл бұрын
Ironically, right wing linguistic eugenics has everyone speaking to a vernacular that’s utterly opposite of what’s occurring. I know it’s odd, and I’m still working out the variables on this particular segment of objective political theory, but abortion isn’t pro-liberal/collectivist, but is individualistic in nature, ie to take priority of the individual self. Caring for others, ie the unborn, would then be collective ie liberal.. I don’t want you to freak out on the implications that you think may be there. It’s something I noticed some years ago and it needs to be sorted before the fight ahead if we are ensure women’s/human rights. The right wing isn’t “prolife”, just probreeding. Actual prolife means ALL LIFE, not just human life..
@72marshflower153 жыл бұрын
@@twells138 ironic, but still on the map
@AbcAbc-sp1od3 жыл бұрын
@@72marshflower15 "...right wing linguistic eugenics..." Lol, wth are you talking about?
@nanszoo30923 жыл бұрын
@@72marshflower15 exactly. I am pro-choice collectively, anti-abortion personally. I don't want to tell someone else how to live their life, but I personally chose to carry all my children who were "unplanned" and not exactly convenient. Making the choice for myself allowed me to hang in during the really tough times better (I believe) than if I had been forced to have them. I would counsel anyone close to me to work it out and carry the baby to term if possible while supporting them any way I could. But I have never dropped any of my friends or acquaintances because they chose abortion and tried to help them deal with that choice as well. I get the sanctity of life argument, but the bigger travesty IMO is all the children living in poverty and/or homeless, all the children living with people who are so addicted or downtrodden that the child becomes a source of income or free labor to them or worse, all the children living with abuse of any kind, and all the other unwanted or orphaned children currently in our foster and care systems. We need to take care of the children we already have before we try to tell people how to handle their unplanned pregnancies. All I see republicans doing is making it harder for the families who are in the worst situations while standing on a supposedly higher moral ground that is so far from the reality of life in our country. Children die every day. If we believe in God, do we really believe that aborted children are any less in God's hand than children who died at 2 years old?
@cwkay68472 жыл бұрын
The abortion issue is not about controlling woman, it’s about protecting human life
@thaddeust.thirdiii7363 жыл бұрын
This was the most disgusting and confusing dialogue I’ve ever heard
@realgena13 жыл бұрын
Dan Savage was the best part of this.
@jonasabry90993 жыл бұрын
I agree with Bill Maher, all of this identity politics is taking away from common sense. And I'm not surprised at Dan Savage having a bad take as usual.
@CDREtrev3 жыл бұрын
There’s nothing wrong with Dan’s take on this. He’s actually quite diplomatic and spot-on. Bill has a smartphone in his pocket. Why is he sitting there waiting for someone to explain to him what a trans man is or how their bodies work?
@anna_L_N3 жыл бұрын
Aboriginal people believe that being photographed steals your sole. Is this another important point we’re missing?
@johnblain14743 жыл бұрын
I knew 2021 was gonna be absurd but I didn’t have “actually, abortion isn’t a woman’s issue” on my list of new horse shit I would have to listen to.
@elmarko90513 жыл бұрын
Or you could try educating yourself...I hear people do it all the time.
@bjensen3 жыл бұрын
I'd love to know when Dan first learned two-spirit. The SJWs (I don't think Dan is a SJW, but he travels in those circles). act like something they learned about 5 minutes ago should now be known by everyone, and if you don't go by the new rules, you are a terrible person. All the while forgetting that they used to think/speak the same way moments ago.
@AbcAbc-sp1od3 жыл бұрын
Also, they constantly move the goal posts too. It's really a form of controlling the conversation.
@CactusThorn3 жыл бұрын
Weren’t women chattel in most Native American tribes? And wasn’t Sacajawea won in a card game? Maybe two spirits wasn’t a such a complement back in the day. Maybe it’s just being reinvented for some pretend kumbaya new age malarkey.
@ncorp26683 жыл бұрын
It was invented in the 90s and it was highly homophobic and upheld rigid gender roles... so yes, you're on point.
@CactusThorn3 жыл бұрын
@@ncorp2668 1990s? I was thinking more like 1890s or even 1790s! Too funny.
@kittykatz88372 жыл бұрын
The guest literally just said that the Founding Fathers had good reasons to be cancelled. Wow.
@maxmustermann95873 жыл бұрын
One of humans greatest ability is to abstract. It helps to see the general picture. But using abstractions when looking into the detail will never work.
@Illlium3 жыл бұрын
It's like the left is living in upside-down land. They seem to think that finding five people that don't fit a standard is somehow proof that a standard is bad. I guess they never heard the expression "an exception proves the rule".
@maxmustermann95873 жыл бұрын
@@Illlium _"It's like the left is living in upside-down land."_ - This has nothing to do with _left_ or _right._ It is common practice to look for exceptions to find the flaws in ones assumption, rule or law.
@Illlium3 жыл бұрын
@@maxmustermann9587 This video is about democrats throwing a shit-fit over something. How is this not a characteristic of the left? The right is not doing that, unless you can prove me wrong with some examples. Republicans are actually the ones abstracting - extrapolating a living person to the fetus. Looking into the details in this issue is what democrats are doing. I hate both camps equally, just so we're on the same page.
@xaspirate80603 жыл бұрын
@@Illlium Nope. It no longer exists. To listen to SJWs pontificate on all of these non-Hetero classifications carrying equal weight within society is a prime example. the five people that you mentioned are now the equal of approx. 2.5 million hetros...just as an example. Actual ratios may vary in your neck of the woods. haha
@Illlium3 жыл бұрын
@@xaspirate8060 These people exist and they have issues, but bringing them to a dogfight that's happening since decades and has basically nothing to do with them is so fucking stupid it puts Donald Trump to shame.
@cassiemontgomery453 жыл бұрын
"If men could get pregnant, then abortion would be a sacrament". I read this quote in a book years ago and wish I could give credit to it's author!
@atrailerinthewoods3 жыл бұрын
DERRRRR
@LoneYote13 жыл бұрын
It’s oft used and totally unhelpful. That is exactly why I believe this is such a divisive topic that leads to rigid tribalism.
@OmegaMouse3 жыл бұрын
@@LoneYote1 Who would have thought that making up some insane bullshit about how men are women would be unhelpful? Captain obvious over here.
@LoneYote13 жыл бұрын
@@OmegaMouse that isn’t even the topic of discussion.
@danbarrett17893 жыл бұрын
You vastly underestimate the amount of losers that exist
@benjaminlackey87653 жыл бұрын
I never seen abortion as trying to control a woman's body. I have always seen it as murdering a defenseless child. I understand that my viewpoints appear limited, and understand there are extremely rare circumstances that would prompt an individual to want an abortion such as rape and incest. What I don't understand is people killing a defenseless child because it is an inconvenience for themselves. That just seems evil to me. Again only my viewpoints, I can respect others viewpoints on the matter but I find them hard to understand.
@cee1193 жыл бұрын
I respect your opinion and perspective. However, I think it is a bit limited because you stop yourself for going deeper. It is control its not what the person wants in their life (sort of like a Vax mandate). All children (born and unborn) are defenseless, but nobody is up in arms daily about poverty and lack of food or education or welfare after the child is born... not saying you in particular... but the same people that are against abortion are the same people who complain about the parents using government assistance to care for the child. So once the baby is born, it's no longer your problem, but when the baby is in the womb, you have an opinion? Does that make sense?
@benjaminlackey87653 жыл бұрын
@@cee119 Yes it makes total sense. I see from your perspective but it begs the question. Why is the system set up this way? I see myself as more of a conservative (close to center not the crazy far out ones) on the matter. I think that programs like living assistance is great to a degree as long as they are not abused. I myself am a single working Father of three and my wife takes care of the kids as 1/3 is special needs. We are on government assistance and couldn't make it without. The system itself needs to be re-worked all together so that something as beautiful as life doesn't have to be weighed by the inconvenience (for a lack of a better word) of poverty.
@cee1193 жыл бұрын
@@benjaminlackey8765 The system is set up this way because of Capitalism is not what it appears to be. It preaches independence but it order for it to be successful it also needs poor people to stay poor and for the middle class to continue to be worker Bees. So certain things are put in place for survival, not upward mobility is only for a small percentage. The system isn't broken, it's working exactly how it's designed.
@chibuezeunachukwu11623 жыл бұрын
Plus how is having voter ID racist in intent?
@Mdrnsamurai3 жыл бұрын
Dan Savage is such a coward... Sorry that everything hurts your feelings and everyone before you wasn't absolutely perfect.
@ElisonJackson3 жыл бұрын
he was being mature, i thought. he disagreed with AOC largely
@Mdrnsamurai3 жыл бұрын
@@ElisonJackson Sure but, the victimization of absolutely everything since the beginning of time is beyond ridiculous and completely unfair to view from a lens of today.