Neptune Missile How it Works | Ukraine Missile Vs Russian Cruiser Moskva Ship

[@Aitelly]

Please Subscribe and turn on Notification Bell

[@Gryffoon]

Neptune missile is a soviet design

[@Wisdomwave-63]

I did this

[@kikaev1980]

No, the Neptune Missile was developed by the Ukrainian design bureau "Luch" in the period from 2014-2020. It was adopted in 2020.@@Gryffoon

[@Gryffoon]

@@kikaev1980 no the neptune is mainly a copy of the soviet missile Kh-35. Kh-35 is a soviet design.

[@VALMOX]

Check it out my LEGO version of the Neptune❤

[@The136th]

I like to add some info from Chinese sources here. 1-2yrs before the Ukraine War, a Slava-class cruiser participated to a joint naval exercise with the Chinese Navy. The Chinese launched a UAV to simulate a sub sonic missile attack on the Russian cruiser, the cruiser's air defence failed twice. The UAV was eventually shot down, but I forgot if it was by the cruiser or by something else. The poor performance of the Moskava wasn't a surprise to the Chinese at all.

[@Oles..]

The Ukrainian Navy has never participated in any exercises with China. Where do these stupid myths come from?

[@triadwarfare]

Was the results of the Chinese war games known to Ukraine and the western collective prior to the invasion?

[@taktuscat4250]

@@triadwarfare definitely if a random guy knew about it

[@spreddyreds9408]

Chinese would have wondered if they supplied the defence to Russia.😂😂

[@The136th]

@@triadwarfare Western military probably know about it considering lots of Chinese speaking military watcher knew about it.

[@Gushik]

Good job! The Neptune is amazing! rip moskva

[@mskatia9940]

Rip USA sponsors of wars around the world

[@ayooo454]

@@mskatia9940 cry more

[@mskatia9940]

@@ayooo454 you will cry😌killer

[@ayooo454]

@@mskatia9940 why did you delete your comment nazi?

[@ayooo454]

@@mskatia9940 you are saying it for 9 years 🤣 the only people who cry are nazi killers that are your nationality) just as moskva sailors)))))

[@clinton3098]

Thanks for your informative video. You also made a video, which I requested. Thanks for acknowledging my request. I am a student and I hope to make a bigger contribution next time.

[@Aitelly]

Thanks for your support financially. Your contribution helps us to produce better Video.

[@ryanthompson5761]

There was a report on the Moskva, and it was grime, the Russians put her to see with multiple problems. Which Include: There was only 1 out of 6 AK630 working the other was cannibalised for parts The Engines was well passed there service date, and was locked into half speed due to overheating and couldn't be used without the admiral permission. The Generators worked at random. The Fire Control Radar wasn't turned on as it interfered with comms and was turned off. And even when turned on had problems lacking onto targets. The Main gun couldn't be fired due to problem with hydraulics out of the 500 fire extinguishers on board there was 50, and they was locked up by the Admiral. So basically it was sailing (at half speed) into a warzone, blind, unable to defend themselves,

[@timohelsing7372]

source?

[@ryanthompson5761]

@@timohelsing7372 Plenty online, Or you can watch Lazerpig moskva breakdown.

[@espada_i_daga]

Literally as a rest of ruzzian chmobics, blind and can't defend themselves in occupied territory

[@henriqueferreira5165]

@@timohelsing7372 do your own research, but i do believe these claims way more than the Russian ones

[@MissMan666]

Sounds the the average state of russian equipment.

[@chrysllerryu4171]

SCENARIO 3. the crew never expect ukraine will attack them in such bad weather condition so they don't bother to man the radar at all

[@Ybvvv]

Exactly! And some air defense systems were faulty due to insufficient technical training of the crew. This is russia

[@josssun]

If your crew doesn't expect to be attacked during war, it's a bad crew

[@Ybvvv]

@@josssun maybe in your country. But it’s just a regular crew in russia

[@MsVarush]

You just don't understand how warship works.

[@mikhaileskola3581]

Погода была хорошая ,через два часа добрались спасатели ,по видео видно волны не было..

[@marvinthemartian9584]

The reason that the Neptune missiles got through is because the Moskva was being held together by duct tape and wishful thinking. The main gun was down due to a hydraulic leak, five out of the six AK-630 ciws down and they were being used as spare parts for the one good one. The fire control radar for the sams was off because it interfered with the satellite radio. The main engines had been pushed well past their service life and could only manage a top speed of 12 knots. The rudders were partially jammed and could only turn a maximum of 20 degrees. Plus, due to rampant theft, all of the ships fire extinguishers were locked up and only the admiral had the keys. Other than that she was a fine ship and in perfect working order.

[@garykong7597]

I like the last sentence lol

[@hamilcar358]

What is your source for this?

[@jpx1508]

UPDATES/WEATHER: Russia's claimed stormy weather was bogus. US Navy reported WINDS CALM W/ NO WAVES. Video/photos confirm. UPDATES/OPTION 3: Moskva defensive systems were in poor repair and partially inoperative (per previous RF Navy audit of Moskva). Moskva sailors were conscripts distracted by an immediately-prior and ongoing attack by Byraktor drones. The conscripts miss-interpreted the incoming Neptune missiles as a part of the ongoing drone attack. 8 seconds later many of them were dead...

[@piotrd.4850]

Radar turned off due to interference with sattelite radio? That's Sheffield excuse.

[@danielhandika8767]

Wtf?

[@ggg-cf9zl]

You've made some mistakes in the video. 8:13 Operational range of Neptune is actually up to 280 km and recent news that Neptune missiles were used to destroy Russian S-400 Triumph complexes in Crimea proves that. And speed isn't 300km/h but 900km/h.

[@moshimoshi7785]

It's worth noting that they say 300kph one minute, then 900 later in the video. The video also says 6 second engagement time on the AK's; but later they say 8 seconds.

[@henriqueferreira5165]

with a speed of 900km/h and the AK's range of 1,6km. the moskva would have had 6 seconds reaction time with the AK's

[@jpx1508]

UPDATES/WEATHER: Russia's claimed stormy weather was bogus. US Navy reported WINDS CALM W/ NO WAVES. Video/photos confirm. UPDATES/OPTION 3: Moskva defensive systems were in poor repair and partially inoperative (per previous RF Navy audit of Moskva). Moskva sailors were conscripts distracted by an immediately-prior and ongoing attack by Byraktor drones. The conscripts miss-interpreted the incoming Neptune missiles as a part of the ongoing drone attack. 8 seconds later many of them were dead...

[@eduardosaborio8239]

There was a report that said that they had to constantly disable the radar since it interfered with the communications systems. It wouldn't surprise me if it was the case

[@Conserpov]

Ukrainians found out about the fire on the Moskva from Russian state news. Cope and seethe.

[@АлексАлекс-щ7ъ]

500 dead

[@tretiakdev]

Glory to Ukraine 💙💛

[@MrZombie]

Black packets for ur people

[@ПавелСанников-р8и]

@@tretiakdev Never exist

[@mansoorulhassan515]

Its just strategized win all time

[@prashanthr1244]

Wow ... Wonderful engineering explaination

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 🙏👍

[@josephpacchetti5997]

Interesting Weapons & Systems, THX Ai Telly. 👊😎 🇺🇸

[@Pwn3dbyth3n00b]

All of those counter measures and it got clapped easily by two missiles.

[@Aitelly]

The storm was the issue 🤔

[@alexmason8557]

@@Aitelly did the sailors survive?

[@vojtakkojecky7765]

yes they were evacuated later on by second ship@@alexmason8557

[@Aitelly]

@@alexmason8557 yes all survived but one died

[@Fuck_Snowflakes]

@@Aitellynot the storm, the fact that they could only use their radios or radars and not together did them in. Their electronics were still 70s tech.

[@jamesharris184]

Well done. I had read elsewhere that the weather on the day of the missile strike wasn't too bad.

[@smippycis6285]

Lots of rampant misinformation during the war from both sides. Really gotta check sources now days.

[@-oysterthief4444]

There is a picture of it listing starboard the next morning

[@idiotic3925]

Ohhhh goddddd ac 130 a biggest surprise thank you so much i desperately want that video thanks for that love from BHARAT 🇮🇳❤

[@STUDI0TK]

There was no stormy weather that day. Moskva was just really badly maintained and basically no systems worked as intended. (For example only 1 of those automatic rotory guns worked). You can read this all in Moskvas maintenence report, that was made cuople of weeks before ukraine invasion.

[@gojoe47]

Kool video animation and explanation couldn't get better than that.

[@jacoblahr]

Look at you... flexin on all of the youtube channels and what not. Keep doin yer thang playa

[@christianvik3400]

Nice to know that Russias defence system are no better when German Matthias Rust landed his airplane at Red Sqare Moscow🤩.

[@CSVspb]

Where are you from?

[@F_JoeBiden-tu6cl]

The info in the video is false.

[@MaticTheProto]

@@F_JoeBiden-tu6cllol

[@Locomotive_Enjoyer_2011]

Cap​@@F_JoeBiden-tu6cl

[@キラ-l2d]

@@F_JoeBiden-tu6cl Proof?

[@Sunscreen723]

animations are magnificent .Good job !

[@TundeEszlari]

I love your videos, you are a very good KZbinr.

[@Aitelly]

Thanks we tried our best with this one. Next week another Video

[@MaxPowerEditz]

@@Aitelly Next video about HAL Prachand attack helicopter

[@AAAAAAANKJJ]

@@MaxPowerEditz Yah please make a video about HAL Prachand

[@lightsalt8279]

South East Asian here. Please make more informative video about naval warfare like this. Considering tension in South China Sea keep rising here.

[@progman347]

So you think you can deter china military might using animation?

[@lightsalt8279]

@@progman347 Don't worry, our country never lost any war. Even in cold war, we won against Communist, while US and allies lost in Vietnam and North Korea. But we might need more and more additional informations to reduce casualty as possible, if war will actually happen in 2027.

[@lightsalt8279]

@@KingFreak-jd8qm They will invade Taiwan for sure. Xi Jinping already stated they must win the Taiwan by force or not in 2027. This statement is not a joke, and could be faster. And CIA director has confirmed this statement as warning and war prediction in 2027. About SEA, I'm not sure all SEA would join the fight. So far I only see Philippine and Indonesia, where Indonesian president said: "There's no negotiation for sovereignty". But Malaysian PM this week said: "we will continue to negotiate" 💀 While Thailand still silence. Brunei is a passive country. Vietnam and Laos is still depending to China. And Junta Myanmar maybe be help China's supply. I can only add Singapore, they maybe calm but they are US allies (de-facto).

[@klimismistakidis1482]

Very impressive video and analysis. The Moskva although looks impressive is probably antiquated and no match for the Neptune missile.

[@ic2e230]

Amazing video. I have commented on a recent video that it would be nice to see a neptune video and here it is❤.

[@MikusVilsons]

Thank you for your very informative animations! Just a small adjustment - kilometres abbreviation is km, and not KMS 👍

[@Aitelly]

Thanks for the info!

[@HMTOlympic5151]

Amazing Neptune missile video my friend ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@Aitelly]

thanks

[@HMTOlympic5151]

@@Aitelly you’re welcome 😇

[@JoeyBlogs007]

They could upgrade the Neptune just by adding some larger winglets to improve lift and range

[@ANUJYADAV-n8v]

Thanks for making So knowledgeable videos❤😂

[@Aitelly]

Thanks to you 😁

[@EngineerAAJ]

Man, your videos are just amazing. I hope KZbin releases its dubbing AI for you soon so I can send to my friends that don't speak English.

[@ridhobaihaqi144]

Russia hyperfans gonna hate this, especially from indo. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Aitelly]

Its all about Engineering we are trying to be as Nuetral as Possible

[@himanshugoswamii]

Not hyperfans dude it's just abt priorities for diff groups of people based on their past experiences.. indo.. people are only hyperfans of BHARAT (India ) .. 😊

[@icemanzw]

No one is going to hate this cause I war anything can happen unlike people like you who think otherwise

[@spreddyreds9408]

True, now go and help your PM beg for loan around the world.😂😂

[@SenseiPandaa]

@@Aitelly then why don't you do this on russian kinzhal missile , ultra precise artillery system, eloctronic warfare systems ? Don't they have any kind of engineering theories?

[@БукерДеВитт-т3щ]

Дякую за випуск. Слава Україні. Дякую за увагу. Коментар в підтримку каналу

[@Onemancheeseburger]

your videos are fire

[@Aitelly]

Thanks

[@MaxPowerEditz]

Please make a video about HAL Prachand attack helicopter

[@FastMan10]

The minimum operational height of 25m isn't so accurate, since this ship was equipped with the newer version 5V55RM missile. It was useless either way.

[@eemtech1606]

What is the meaning of "is not so accurate" in your sentence?

[@FastMan10]

@@eemtech1606 according to russian sources the minimum altitude to intercept an airborne target (aircraft or nsm) can vary between 10-25m in the latest variant (5V55RM) which is the one equipped in the moskva cruiser. Probably the ship was first spotted (geolocated) by a drone, then I can fire the missile without turning on the radar (knowing its position) so that the missile (neptune) can fly its first path using INS and the final stage active its own radar seeker to acquire the ship.

[@lpdirv]

Weather was calm, ship was not moving, ship systems were probably in shit shape. Believe there was a report about the state of repair of the ship systems and it wasn’t good. Now add in that russian training generally sucks and their leadership is terrible and you get the idea that the BSF is a joke. Still dangerous, like a monkey with a grenade or nuke. The Orcs almost shot down a Rivet Joint, let that sink in. The B2’s would have sunk every ship that the BSF still have in inventory. Its just crazy, russian crazy.

[@madanlalsharma1817]

Very very beautiful description I like it brilliant

[@bstange]

R360 Neptune has a crusing speed of about 0.8 mach. Not 300km/h...

[@Ηγδρα_βοα]

300km is range

[@ASMM1981EGY]

outstanding video

[@user-ww4od4jl1f]

*The Moscow cruiser had everything, the best synchronization, the best radar, missiles, one of which supposedly could have sunk a US aircraft carrier; and is now lying at the bottom of the sea. The best Russian technology.*

[@rademare7286]

The ship could be that, but loss of good maintenance and modernization due to strong curruption in Russia (becouse what is know like 70% of ship equipment didnt work)+ crew mistakes lead to this outcome. But todays weapons are stronger than any most advanced ship no matter the nantion.

[@user-ww4od4jl1f]

@@rademare7286 *"todays weapons are stronger than any most advanced ship no matter the nantion." - what causes there are anti-missiles against missiles. As usual, the technologically superior country wins.*

[@rademare7286]

@@user-ww4od4jl1f yes and I also said that 70% of equipment (SAMs, CIWS, damage control) was out of servise becouse of lack of maintenance due to corruption in Russia

[@user-ww4od4jl1f]

@@rademare7286 *That's exactly right.*

[@uostap1]

Friends, please do not belittle the merit of the intelligent Ukrainian military. It was the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet. And the Russian army is one of the strongest armies in the world.

[@Sailingspeedat9kn]

Could you please make a video on a artillery

[@razvanciobotaru3089]

Make a video about NASAMS System and one about IRIS-T, battery, launchers and etc.

[@MS-cr4hi]

Thank You!

[@sebastiand152]

How would a Neptun radar with 600 km range work? It seems not to be built high above the ground and the targeted ships are also not so elevated. At 600 km distance, they would be undetectable due to the curvature of the earth. Or do I miss anything?

[@mikhaileskola3581]

На берегу за островом радары ,там расстояние 100 км..

[@artpost854]

The combat range of Neptune missiles is 280 km with a 150 kg warhead against naval targets or 400 km with a 350 kg warhead against land targets. Flight speed 0.8 to 0.85 Mach. Idiologically, the missile is close to the X-35 and Harpoon, but differs from them in size and components.

[@abirmahmud3809]

Make A video on Chinese 055 Destroyer.....!!!

[@Aitelly]

What Chinesse Destroyer can you name

[@abirmahmud3809]

@@Aitelly xianyang

[@keithdrower9120]

Bravo. Great shot Ukraine......!

[@bandhanmondal4685]

I love this channel❤

[@RISHUS174]

Очень интересно, спасибо за это пособие

[@josssun]

Jerk, this is open information 😂

[@patjr35234]

What happened with patria video? amazing video yeet again

[@gansior4744]

Water was calm, with no waves. Missile didnt hide behind the waves, but just the radar wasn't working, as well as close range cannons. Basically, swimming wreck, so no wonder missiles got thru

[@shoktroop]

Well done!

[@UnclePuzzled]

I wish your team inspiration! Your animations are always beautifully and clearly explained:) With regard to "Moscow", we can also add that they did not expect such audacity, otherwise they would not have come so close to the shore. It is the same story that the Russians underestimated Ukraine. By the way, an interesting fact: "Moscow" was built in Ukraine during the Soviet occupation :)

[@No.Inkognito]

The aftermath of the Soviet occupation of what? )) What are you talking about?

[@UnclePuzzled]

@@No.Inkognito As a Russian, it must be unpleasant for you to hear such thoughts about your country. But you yourself understand that the Soviet Union was a violent structure - the occupation of "friendly republics." Therefore, in general, this is occupation in this case of Ukraine.

[@No.Inkognito]

@@UnclePuzzled Such words are not unpleasant to hear, but sad. In the West, they almost never tell details about the USSR. Ukraine could not have been occupied in any way if it had been part of Elina's country.😔 Pay attention. All parts of the Union were inside on the rights of republics and had some autonomy in decision-making. And this structure was laid down initially, unlike the united Russian Empire. Not only has Ukraine never been occupied, but, moreover, it was first separated from Russia in 1922 and, together with Belarus, formed the main core of the Soviet Union. )) And no, the Soviet Union was no more "cruel country" than all other democratic countries. And, most likely, a much freer country. Because it had a multi-level election system. All strata of society could be sure that their interests were represented by those whom they knew well and were confident in their decency. I could tell you a lot of details that you could confirm from Western sources. I was born and raised in the USSR. Today, among the remaining third of the former population of Ukraine, grandmothers are imprisoned for likes in Russian social networks.networks. (recently in Chernihiv) It is forbidden to treat Russians and Russia normally at the state level. And in school textbooks, 20 years ago they wrote that Russians are enemies and underdeveloped creatures. And no one (in the West) cares that this is not much different from "Nazism" and that Ukrainians were artificially made enemies for Russia. Literally every second Ukrainian has relatives in Russia. But it's hard for you to imagine such a monstrous farce...

[@UnclePuzzled]

@@No.Inkognito On December 30, 1922, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic concluded an agreement with the Ukrainian and Belarusian Soviet "Socialist Republics" on the formation of the Soviet Union. Before that, for many years (1918, for example), there were military operations against the forces of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, which somehow ended up on the territory of Ukraine. Have you ever wondered what they were doing there? The entry of Ukrainian lands into the USSR was preceded by the establishment of communist authorities on this territory, which ruled the Holodomor in 1921-1923 (according to research, about half a million people died at that time!), which was not the result of drought alone, but was also a policy of "predistribution" , which exported an excessive amount of harvest from the territory of Ukraine. Why don't you mention the large-scale uprisings (due to dissatisfaction with the communist government) on the territory of Ukraine after 1922 and another famine of 1932-1933, which was also the policy of the "great" USSR (about 3 million people died in those years, and which was also not by chance, as the Russian side still writes). Regarding the second paragraph: either you are deliberately lying, or while living in the USSR you were still a child/did not notice what was happening around you. As I have already mentioned, famines and then repressions (for example, the Soviet political prisoner O. Solzhenitsyn gave the figures of 66 million repressed in the USSR (while Western historians write about 45-80 million), usually these were people "unpleasant" to the authorities, "spies", who were actually people who did their job poorly, for example, in the industry, and rebels who were against the Soviet government). Elections in the USSR were almost never transparent and usually the results were falsified in favor of certain candidates. The authorities were not interested in the lack of a large number of consumer goods, but weapons were produced in large quantities! The USSR was a totalitarian state, which cannot be "freer" than a democratic country, what are you talking about?!

[@UnclePuzzled]

@@No.Inkognito First of all, the person from Chernigov, about whom you speak, worked as a "gunner" - for money he provided the "Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation" with military and civilian coordinates! objects, and then Russian missiles get there... This is called espionage for the benefit of the enemy. This is a common thing during any war on both sides of the conflict! Regarding your longer theses: Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, killed civilians... During WW2 the British hated the Germans, they taught history in school explaining that Germany and its troops were to blame for starting the war. The German population mostly hated the British, and vice versa. Now Russia is conducting an information policy to convince the Western World that Ukrainians are Nazis.. However, I have not seen a single Nazi...! What are you talking about.. Finally, at the end of the 10s, Ukrainian schools stopped teaching history with Russian narratives! This does not mean that the Russians are enemies! (though don't forget that more than 75% of Russians now support Russia's actions -- isn't that Nazism??!) The statement "that every second Ukrainian has relatives in Russia" is an audacious lie! There is indeed mixing in border areas, but these are only border areas.

[@yanreis5421]

what is the source of data for the production of the video

[@philipharris-smith5889]

So 2 out of 3 defence systems could not engage the Neptune. Both missiles hit, was the automated close defence offline or did Ukraine fire many missiles?

[@dr.fancyngandwe4129]

No matter how advanced your counter systems are it all hinges down on how low can you limbo

[@azertyazerty5347]

Which program he is using in animation?

[@rashedulkabir6227]

Please make a video about Ukrainian cardboard drones and how those work.

[@spartacusreview]

They are from Australia

[@ayooo454]

@@spartacusreview cry more l0s3r?

[@JeromeIgnacio-d3h]

Can't wait for the next content about the Angel of death gunship

[@Thewayofgrass35]

Hello

[@Aitelly]

Hello

[@Thewayofgrass35]

i love this channel@@Aitelly

[@Aitelly]

@@Thewayofgrass35 Thanks

[@truthseeker3219]

Scenario number 3, the ship commander to much drinking vodka

[@Galomortalbr]

this video is so informative, thanks, i was tired of just hearing "Russian air defense doesn't work"

[@gino3286]

Hi thank you for the very good video I have a trivial question I wonder if these highly advanced anti ship missiles are making warships of all kind obsolete Considering that a decent warship costs about half a billion what is the reason of spending such amount of money when a 5 millions missile can destroy it ? Am i missing something ?

[@antonfilatov8140]

Brilliant!

[@cgmax7]

Please make a video on V-280 which is the Next-Generation Aircraft

[@tahasayed9341]

Name of the software used

[@EzerReborn]

Ask Moskva. He knows better how it works 😂

[@backpackingtony1779]

Commenting to support the algorithm. 😂

[@2184u]

Neptune was God of the sea in Kievan Rus. Neptune rocket is the best in the world.

[@dhannyhalim9892]

Ukraine,a country which their destroyer cant be destroy

[@illiahapak501]

To pros I'd add possibility to hit land targets (it hit S-400 Triumf recently).

[@Տիգրան-ժ1է]

When

[@illiahapak501]

@@Տիգրան-ժ1է Aug 23rd

[@shreyascprabhu90]

Make a video on mantis air defence system

[@ausezpauser]

Thanks you to @jpx1508, for doing the job you can't : UPDATES/OPTION 3: Moskva defensive systems were in poor repair and partially inoperative (per previous RF Navy audit of Moskva). Moskva sailors were conscripts distracted by an immediately-prior and ongoing attack by Byraktor drones. The conscripts miss-interpreted the incoming Neptune missiles as a part of the ongoing drone attack. 8 seconds later many of them were dead...

[@tsb28]

Make a video on the kornet anti tank missile

[@Jakub1989YTb]

From 5:19 you're showing the missile flying with the booster attached. Very big mistake and show's lack of "prrofreading". Fast content at all costs. I don't like that.

[@Jakub1989YTb]

for example at 6:26

[@mahyuddinsahidjan698]

Can u please make an navy warships animation and also they're armament😊

[@ANUJYADAV-n8v]

Wait for Ac 130 video 😅

[@Aitelly]

Next week Friday/Saturday

[@GG-gj3bp]

Scenario 3 : U must have a lucky day 🤞

[@AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys]

Nice missile (rocket) but is it hypersonic??? Roa Aotearoa nui.

[@ericcheng3143]

Remember. A chain is as stronger as its weakest link. This battle cruise has a defensive weakness against low flying missile. If the Mokva had fully functional those vulcan type machine guns, they would have destroyed for sure one of the missile. None of them fired. Ukranians attacking with two missiles were correct! one is not enough. Best to attack this vessel with four instead of two to make sure.

[@dominator3726]

inaccuracy is visible. "Osa" is not a vertical launch system. a launcher with two missiles extends from under the deck.

[@dennyfpv1996]

There are a lot of comments about how easily they were sunk, but in reality all the ships of both the USA and China are very easy to sink, because the reliability of all these protection systems is very low. Even if everything works well, two autocannons can be overloaded with the number of missiles.

[@sghoverland]

SAM is joke for u?

[@vasylmelnyk1362]

Speed 900 km/h not 300 kn/h.

[@fabriziodagostini9081]

Great work of the Global Hawk

[@md.abdullah40]

লম্বা সময় আছি এ চ্যানেলে বাংলা ভাষায় ভিডিও তৈরি করেন😊

[@MohamedSalah-lb6ju]

What about khinzal missles tell us how it took out patriot battery

[@yaroslavbouchet]

Who says that Кинжал took out a battery?

[@timohelsing7372]

​​@@yaroslavbouchetнаписано в похоронних повідомленнях матерям українських зенітників)

[@xyesosso2869]

@@timohelsing7372Я написал от тебя похоронное письмо твоей матери,так что твоя мать сдохла инфа сотка

[@xyesosso2869]

Ахахахахахахах

[@roberthurley8366]

The weather was very calm on the day the ship was attacked, this is easily verified by pictures taken after the attack. There are known issues with the radar systems conflicting with each other and when the radars are used the communication systems cannot be used due to interference. Most of the close in weapon systems designed for point defense were not operational and had been scavenged for spare parts to keep the one operational unit operating even though it wasn't. The ship was a victim of poor maintenance and upkeep more than anything else because if it was maintained the attacking missiles would have been shot down. Condolences to the families of those lost and prayers that the lessons are learned from this incident and applied

[@Statueshop297]

Only the S300 worked and 1 out of 8 AK CIWS guns at its last maintenance report. Not to mention the sensor issues and breakdowns that happened often. That ship never of been anywhere near a warzone.or even at sea.

[@Ozbird-72]

Why not take Kerch bridge down with those?

[@EliteBadFrog]

Out of range

[@largol33t1]

It was clever how they programmed the missile to almost skim over the waves. Makes it extremely difficult for the CIWS on the Moskva to fire at a downwards angle to intercept it, if they worked at all...

[@EmarElutin]

Ask the crew of Moskva how Neptune works.🤣🤣🤣

[@johnm8693]

I have really enjoyed your content for a long time. Unfortunately KZbin's decision to demonetize Russel Brand over what are - at this point - mere allegations forces me to unsubscribe from every channel on KZbin. I wish you the best of luck and thank you for the content.

[@jaxonl7810]

.....that doesn't make any fucken sense

[@buryitdeep]

I had the same thought. Once Rumble gets better I'm gone.

[@alligatorpc]

It's highly unlikely for r360 to skim the water at a min flight height during stormy weather as the turbulent ground (combined with an assumed dense ew battlespace) would limit the performance of its own radar and could increase the interception envelope since the target sensors are higher than its flight profile.

[@JustinTurnerman]

Big paper tiger. Anyone can say anything. Actions speak louder than words.

[@ayushshetty07]

Please make animation of starlink satellite

[@isadanjan4762]

Next Kalibr, P800?

[@-_o_o_-]

The neptunes homing head is have semiactive mode.

[@bo2web]

1:29 Think it's 0,8 Mach for the Neptune missile. > than 300 km/h

[@hamzabakhtaj8740]

Make video Russian Aircraft carrier 📸

[@ДмитрийЧ-з3я]

The Neptune missile is based on the Soviet X35, which is a clone of the American Harpoon. х35 has been completely redesigned (only the body and the layout diagram remain) The missile is equipped with a guidance system that captures a target at a distance of up to 50 km, resistant to radio-electronic warfare. Also at the time of the presentation, the developers claimed that these missiles can attack in a group. When attacking a group, missiles exchange information, independently choose a priority target, its hitting points(the system is able to determine the profile of the target), or distribute targets among themselves. At the moment, I found mention of such possibilities only in old Russian publications

[@piotrd.4850]

I doubt that so low radar can acquire ships at that distance.

[@toxichuman208]

But UAV.