All-New 2023 Toyota Sequoia review // Is this a rare Toyota fail?

[@SandmanV3]

Nowadays these honest reviews are super appreciated. Test drives are almost non existent in Canada. Imagine waiting for your order to arrive in 1-2 years and end up utterly disappointed.

[@James-il3tq]

If you buy a $90,000 vehicle without a test drive that's on you. It's not difficult to find these to test drive (although you might not find your preferred trim).

[@SandmanV3]

@@James-il3tq Please point to me where I can find a demo unit in Ontario, Canada. Dealers here rather sell every unit they have in inventory. "It's a Toyota you should know what you're getting into."

[@chrisdiscodude]

@@SandmanV3 I can confirm that this is the case here in my city. A Toyota dealership i went to only has 1 car for a test drive. If you choose to order any other car but that one, no test drive for you. It's crazy.

[@90DegreeCircle]

@Spectre26 Come across the border to WNY. I had an SR5 last week from West Herr. It was very disappointing.

[@markhale9877]

Nothing hones about the review.

[@alwaysiyi272]

About the MPG, I feel a lot of people got carried away when they heard the word hybrid, they expected this huge SUV to get like 30 maybe 35mpg, but if that was the case, the engine would have to run on the Atkinson cycle, which it doesn't, it would have a CVT, which it doesn't because it is an SUV that needs to tow, and it is heavy and as about aerodynamic as a fridge. This thing was never meant or designed to get good MPG, it is not a hybrid in the sense of a Prius or a RAV4 hybrid it is a hybrid for power and smoothness and especially towing, this thing has more power than virtually any of the gas rivals in its class, except for something like the Cadillac Escalade V, and it has one of the most if not the most torque in its class. Yall are also driving the TRD Pro with the more aggressive treadwear, an in crease in ride height, and it has a rood rail as well, not exactly the best recipe for good fuel economy. The 3rd row is a little disappointing but I don't think it is as big of a deal when you factor in what this vehicle can do offroad and still be able to fit 7 or 8 people decently, its the only truck in its segment to have like actual off-road capabilities, and I know that off-roadability is not the most important thing in this segment but with the Land Cruiser gone, something had to fill in the space, and that was the Sequoia. So I get why you might call this a fail but I don't believe it is as bad as everyone else makes it seem.

[@FrankAparo]

I had many Tahoes and Suburbans they had similar issues until they introduced the independent rear suspension. When the independent rear suspension is incorporated the floor can be lowered and there is a footwell for 3rd row. Toyota had to use components from the Tundra to keep the Sequoia viable given its small sales volume. I drive a Tundra Crew Max and a 4 Runner I like both of these vehicles. The Ford Expedition also has the independent rear suspension and has a much lower floor height.

[@DCuerpoJr]

The problem is the previous generation Sequoia had rear independent suspension, more cabin and cargo capacity.

[@christopherclark4774]

To me, I like a solid axle in the way of ride and durability, etc... But the last IRS setup was still better than this. What amazes me though is that my 2001 first gen sequoia with a solid axle doesn't have the ledge shown in the back. Yeah I can't fold down the seats, but when I take them out, at least I have a flat floor up to the second Row. How Toyota overcomplicated this gen sequoia is amazing, that in combo with the problematic turbo v6... I'll stay far away (Coming from a 01 sequoia owner (225k miles) and 15 tundra owner(145k miles))

[@dallinnevitt_444]

Isn’t from the hybrid batteries

[@Jeymez]

then just get rid of it, there's no point in keeping a vehicle that barely sells. that wasn't always the case, but this is not your grandpa's or uncle's 01-04 Sequoia. that was a good generation, but we're a long way from those days. the small sales mainly have to do with, Toyota not giving a damn about the vehicle. it's like Nissan with the Armada, they don't do much with it. the only one they don't need to touch that still sells decently well, is the 4runner, but it makes sense. the 4Runner is designed for offroad use and light duty work. the Sequoia is technically supposed to be a family suv, and it was at one time, but since 05 Toyota has done very little to get people to buy it.

[@MIZUNOMP60]

Great review Zach and Andrea, very informative and unbiased. When I first saw this new gen Sequoia at its press release, I knew Toyota got it wrong with this new design. Factor in the abysmal fuel economy too and it indeed is a rare miss for Toyota. Every reviewer's take I've seen on this new Sequoia has a similar theme. Among the common complaints like you covered are an unrefined ride, gas guzzling fuel economy especially given it's a hybrid, poorly designed interior layout/functionality with the cramped third row and no flat loading floor (in the traditional sense) Given it's dimensions the cargo capacity overall is very uncompetitive with other brands in this class. The afterthought cargo shelves to alleviate the flat loading floor situation to me seems like a compromise to a design fault rather than an innovative design from Toyota (I understand the hybrid battery pack is incorporated under the third-row seats, so that decision has greatly affected the cargo set-up). No full time AWD/4WD offered in the States. On the plus side, plenty of power, competitive with towing numbers and it's a Toyota so it should be reliable. For a newly designed vehicle and for those Sequoia fans waiting for this for what seems like an eternity to make it to market, overall, this has to be a disappointment.

[@daman9780]

ya but it will outlast anything in quality and reliablity then anything the big 3 can produce.....it has a proven record for toyota for what the last 10 years by jd power,consumer reports,etc and etc

[@akc5247]

What use - even if it becomes reliable -, if it is unusable as a 3 row vehicle?

[@daman9780]

@@akc5247 not everyone need a 3rd row and rather have no 3rd row and wayyyyyy better reliablity down the road so the service rep doesnt know my name like at gm ford or dodge

[@akc5247]

@@daman9780 sure But that's beside then point. Focus for this vehicle is for families needing 3 rows. If it cannot satisfy that basic requirement, it is off the list - reliable or not.

[@daman9780]

@@akc5247 buy what ever you want and watch the deprecation value drop like a rock from a tower and in 10 years you will have paid the cost of the suv in repair bills and the toyota will keep going strong....i bet you in 10 years you wont even own the suv anymore ....go take a look and see if you can find a used old sequoia....thay are hard to find for a reason....people hang on to them as they are RELIABLE and dont cost the owners money....buy and old one has more room then a surburban then and will last longer then any of the new big 3 suv's

[@Jay-bw3fl]

Thanks for keeping it real and not being afraid to tell it like it is. Seems like this hybrid is only better for the environment on paper and not in reality. My 2022 Silverado 4x4 with the 5.3 v8 gets 16-18mpg real world. Doesn’t seem like it’s worth risk of the extra tech being unreliable over time to go for the Toyota. Sure does look cool though.

[@slyfox909]

I really wanted to like the new Sequoia because I think it’s very good-looking. But they completely ruined the practicality of such a large vehicle with that 3rd row design. The 4Runner has more usable interior space now. A swing and a miss from Toyota

[@ctclardy]

I completely agree, it seems like Toyota designers were deprived of their morning coffee when they designed the interior of this vehicle... that back seat fold-down is laughable old-school and the second seat arrangement makes one just scratch their head in wonder... it's like they called back their long-retired engineers to come back for the redesign and they just retreaded old archaic layouts... I guess Toyota has to make some mistakes but, this is overkill.

[@leftcoaster67]

Maybe they hired some fired GM/Ford designers....

[@ctclardy]

@@leftcoaster67 Even GM and Ford designers are not that incompetent... that backseat design functionality is below 3rd-grade incompetence.

[@leftcoaster67]

@@ctclardy Pontiac Aztek? ;)

[@ctclardy]

@@leftcoaster67 GM buries their mistakes... maybe Toyota needs to do the same with this one.

[@kpmmsupervision1297]

Hard words Chris! But they deserve them.

[@monicahavechristjesus5455]

I know a lot more about cars since i started watching this channel a few years ago. I really enjoy this couple ☺️

[@andreaspencer9813]

Thank you very much!

[@njbloke]

Love your honest reviews. So many others just rave about this vehicle and don’t critique.😊

[@tonylee4838]

+1 on the honest opinions. Honest opinions from experts and objective comparison across the competition is what consumers and buys want to know. It was super helpful to watch your video.

[@andreaspencer9813]

Glad to hear it, thank you!

[@scottnewellguitar]

Wow that space between the huge screen and rear view mirror is really tight! If you want to put a radar detector below the mirror there won’t be much visibility there.

[@johnholst]

Zach and Andrea...I love the way you guys coordinate your clothes with each other and the vehicle you review! Looks sharp!

[@andreaspencer9813]

Thank you very much!

[@trevorhowell6575]

You two do the best reviews anywhere, honest, straightforward, and you don't see anywhere else. I really appreciate it because it saves me the time of having to go test drive duds. Actually I have stopped test driving them and just purchase them. Just make a few calls to find the cheapest deal, and it's all done. Never been disappointed, so thanks!

[@Motormouth...]

Much appreciated!

[@gregp.7148]

Love the rugged looks and the turbo V6, but that fuel economy and price is not on the side of this Sequoia!

[@MarkR973]

Good morning, Mark from NJ here… besides the negative comments, aesthetically I think it looks nice and at least it is all new and provides insight into where Toyota is going with its trucks. …. This is basically a Tundra with a closed cab. Does this reveal any influence for what the GX new design might incorporate? I’m looking for clues. I drive a 2011 Avalon Limited that I bought new, 167,463 miles on him so far, everyday driver, love it, never an issue mechanically but the seats on a long drive over two hours cut my circulation off!!. .. and the drivers leather seat has a tear in it, not the most durable leather, I’m 5’10” and weigh 185 so perhaps average sized man so it is not abused in my view, my only complaints really. I have to add its pearl white and the paint began bubbling and flaking off after 7 years and Toyota re-painted it for me and gave me a loaner! Was impressed they stood behind it, grateful! Hey, you guys have any idea about the GX forthcoming in terms of what it might look like and when it might arrive?… I’m waiting patiently on the new GX release, don’t wanna buy a new, old one, and I trust Toyota/Lexus new releases so I’m ok with diving in, but only will wait until year end cause who know, it could be a century before they ever release an all new one and I ain’t got that kinda time… 😂 love the videos, faithful follower, stay warm, be well !

[@afzalshaikh2128]

I’m up early on snowy Saturday morning to watch this one. Great review 👍

[@andreaspencer9813]

Thank you, glad you liked it!

[@michaeltsui3280]

love your videos, very honest opinions from a user's perspective 👍

[@Motormouth...]

Glad you like them!

[@planbparadise2046]

Delete the red seats says the guy in the red shirt

[@UltimaRSfan]

Thank you for an honest review. Every other auto journalist i seen just praised it to the moon. It looks good, but i also want to know the practical aspect.👍

[@andreaspencer9813]

Glad you liked it, just couldn't praise this one.

[@foxlake6750]

A friend has an F150 twin turbo, at 60 mph, gets 28 mpg, but at 65-70 mph, it drops to 20 mpg because the turbos come into play. The EPA combined rating for this SUV 20 mpg, which is best case. Once the turbos kick in, good luck.

[@ChopperChad]

Average 18 on my F150 Ecoboost. About 22 on road trips.

[@yournightmare9999]

Big cars in turbos or twin turbos is a trash. But tough low IQ drivers still drive pickups to work everyday and carry havy air in back

[@citizentex5720]

So glad you posted this. I am near buying one for the gas mileage. Seriously. Thank you.

[@josephsanluis1733]

I already had my reservations about this before it came out. Your video just confirmed it and more. Love this video, very informative. 👍🏼

[@jonclassical5710]

Loved the filming in the snow guys!!! Since my 1995 Avalon (loved it) to my 1999 4-Runner, (hated it) I have not bought another Toyota and don't ever plan to...my brother is on his 3rd Prius...loves em.....to each his own.....plus "who can even find a Sequoia" to test drive besides the motor press?!?!? Great report Motormouth!

[@mcmeelp20]

You mention the msrp of the limited being just 65k in the US. I was interested in buying one last month that a local dealer had available. Price was 87k… so yeah Toyota dealers need to stop the price hikes. They lost my business on the spot

[@herbertwedermanjr239]

Two Words: Zacks Shirt”!!! Totally highlights the ridiculous camo red seats, that do the exact opposite of camo. The seats are too over the top, as well as the ridiculous oversized badging on the grill and even more crazy on the passenger dash. Zach is 100% correct, diesel is the way to go for towing in this application. Modern diesels burn super clean nowadays too. Nice looking vehicle from the side and back.

[@robertduklus6555]

i dont think toyota has any diesel engines for ''civilian" application. they divested from diesel propulsion in europe few years ago and there is no way they will bring one to NA . you are right mate, red leather in off road aspiring model??? ridonculous.

[@mtrotter325]

what a great review - thank you !! I had a 2003 Sequoia and wow, I loved that except for the gas mileage. If I recall that model correctly, the 3rd row not only moved forward and backward but also could tumble forward as well as be removed. It appears the 2023 sits on that platform as electronics may be underneath the seats (electronic fold and recline). That causing loss of headroom. It doesn't seem customer input or focus groups were considered for design. I had a QX80 so I might have to go back too that as it has more room in the caboose. What a shame...

[@stephengneri2136]

With the sound off Zack getting in the way back is hysterical. The main reason you guys are the best is you tell the truth. good/bad/so so.

[@yfbgca9492]

Thanks for the great and honest review. I hope they won’t screw up like this on the next generation 4 runner and Prado which is rumoured to come to North America soon.

[@davidh3049]

i love the look! that's exactly how i configured it before I canceled reservation. I think toyota should have released it as PHEV and provided XL option.

[@papagen00]

Last week in Yosemite I saw a Sequoia and Tahoe parked side by side and I much prefer Tahoe's styling especially in light gray (white-ish) color and black wheels! In general new Toyota /Lexus products have sacrificed quiet and plush cabin for sport which I think is a huge mistake.

[@eggheadegghead]

just tried this SUV 2 weeks ago. I can’t even sit straight in the 3rd row, WTH. Not sure what Toyota designers were thinking? Is this even a large SUV?

[@stig120212]

Great great great real review of the new Sequioa!! thats why i watch your channel.. no bs and tell the truth

[@andreaspencer9813]

Thank you very much!

[@Chenny0]

As always Andrea your outfit color coordination is fabulous!

[@andreaspencer9813]

Awe thank you very much!

[@chrisbui5555]

You forgot to mention the reason Sequoia seats are raised up because of the rear solid axle. This helps the car flex for better offroading.

[@stevep5736]

No thanks. I’ll stick with my 2010 Sequoia Platinum. Plenty of space , comfort and safety for the whole family, extra cargo room and two big dogs. A bullet proof tank on wheels.

[@TalismanPHX]

Brutally honest review. Thanks for taking the gloves off on the Sequoia. People will buy it for the Toyota badge, but I'd rather have a Tahoe or Suburban turbo diesel. Well done.

[@justinsalazar9070]

Yeah good luck down that road especially with resale value

[@timphillips4147]

Wow Andrea, that's a monster of a truck. Even the front grill scowls don't mess! Great interia with the red contrast seating and other subtle red accents. Front dash and infotainment screen look good on the eye.

[@andreaspencer9813]

Yes, it's one of those vehicles people see and get right out of your way.

[@timphillips4147]

@Andrea Spencer I'd do exactly the same too!

[@Stinger430]

I had just watched your CX-90 introduction video a few days ago, and I have to say I prefer the Mazda. Are these two vehicles even competitors? Or am I comparing apples to oranges? The Mazda seems to be so much more useful (packaging wise).

[@Motormouth...]

Mazda for moving people, this for towing...

[@justinsalazar9070]

We had the Mazda cx90 it’s very uncomfortable sequoia has way more room and resale value is night and day

[@scottleech9571]

Great honest review .. that fuel economy is brutal

[@tylermccomb1925]

Yeah I do wonder though how long they actually drove it. If I have my battery unhooked for whatever reason on my Tundra it'll read 30l/100k and gradually come down to 18l/100k over the course of a couple tanks of gas. I can't help but wonder if the Sequoia wasn't totally 'set'

[@mrsargemeister]

What would you expect when they keep hammering the pedal? Not buying that they went soft. I always get 10% better then epa rating.

[@stonecoldcustoms]

Toyota only does redesigns every 10-15 years so it seems like they are always lagging behind the competition and are out of touch with what customers want. GM and Ford have been redesigning their trucks and full size SUVs every 5 years for the last 2-3 product cycles and that focus shows in their products. They're just tweaking and making improvements rather than reinventing the wheel like Toyota. Toyota needs to up their game.

[@stonecoldcustoms]

@Hugh M. they're still one of the top vehicle manufacturers in sales thanks to their reputation for quality. They don't have much motivation to innovate or have the nicest vehicles in my opinion. The last Tundra lasted through 4 major GM truck redesigns, lol

[@ningjiang9722]

almost got one at my dealership, SR5+Premium package. $64140 USD, 2 wheel drive. no markup, dealer agreed to take $1000 off if I buy that day. But I did not. Everything is great on this car, just the third row down is not flat makes me holding off buying.

[@janoycresnova9156]

2wd on this is not great

[@newsmedia-one9756]

I’m a diehard Toyota person, but I definitely would not buy this vehicle for myself. I think the Nissan Amada and the GMC Yukon are the two most appealing ones to me.

[@jermainedouglas7301]

Toyota made is gorgeous and hit the styling on the head. Sacrificed functionality that was there on the last gen.

[@mindlab780ab6]

Wow ! Thanks for the reviews. I was gonna get one but I don’t think so now.

[@1976axerhand]

One thing, Toyota did not add the hybrid system for better gas mileage, they added it for more power. They said that in the beginning.

[@goonies_never_say_die]

Keep in mind that to get better fuel economy in a GM full size, you'd need the diesel and diesel fuel can be quite a bit more than the regular gas that the Sequoia takes.

[@C00N808]

Also keep in mind. Sequoia is TWIN TURBO. Yes sure it’s a hybrid. But we all should know that turbo/boosted cars will eat more gas

[@rashid138888]

I am from Middle East, I tried to place an order in Canada and they told me I have two years of waiting list 😢

[@nicholassmith7048]

After developing the Tundra, Toyota really phoned in the Sequoia. It's basically just a Tundra with an enclosed cab and a third row. GM,Ford and Jeep all learned a generation ago that full-size SUV buyers demand more than a pickup with an enclosed cab and third row. They demand a unique interior, an automatic AWD system, an independent rear suspension and an uncompromised third row. It does have a strong powertrain, though. Overall 6.8/10.

[@sp1pilot]

I like the exterior styling, but Toyota missed the mark on almost everything else.

[@nore8141]

$90,000 is a lot of coin for a truck that doesn’t meet up to the standards of today. Imo it’s not going to do well with others in its class.

[@DrSlideit]

The B-roll has them hauling ass off every stop! 😂⛽️

[@Paddleinc]

We were a Toyota family but after owning a 22 Sienna hybrid we were so disappointed! It broke down 3 times and was a total lemon. We were going to trade it in on a trd sequoia but we swore not to buy a hybrid again. We just bought a 23 Yukon Denali and my wife is loving it. They even gave us $10k cdn more than we paid for the van on trade Happy wife happy life!!

[@kellingtonlink956]

The famous Land Cruiser was just discontinued in the United States (though available abroad). I think Toyota is assuming that North Americans might mistake (or consider) this Sequoia for one. It isn’t. It just isn’t. The Sequoia has never been cheap, but at this price there are so many better non-hybrid options. So if you really really like RAV4s and really want to spend about or over hundred thousand dollars! (taxes/financing)… get out your crayons and write a cheque out for what will never ever be… a legendary Land Cruiser. Thanks for the video.

[@kellingtonlink956]

I do, however, still like it.

[@subingeorgesajan7276]

Such a disappointment especially for the price point. I'd much rather buy a used previous gen Sequoia. I won't be surprised if Toyota pulls the plug on this in a few years time

[@christofonobrown3659]

I really like the way these and the new Tundras look, thank you for the review.

[@ChuckHT]

Luckily i switched my factory order from a Sequoia Trd Pro to a Tundra Trd Pro lol and she is arriving next month!

[@clairestudio2024]

I give 9 on the looks and performance, 1 on the space and fuel economy, 9+1=10. Solid 10 score vehicle

[@joserman2131]

Those seats are gorgeous

[@srmashwani]

You guys are experts here but let me add one thing. When I purchased my 2021 2.4L Tucson, for first year, the fuel economy that my Car showed me on digital cluster was between 16L-19L/100km. After a year and 2 service, it became better and after 2 years now, as of today, I get 10.2-11.5L/100km in city and 8.6-9.2L/100km on highway. Not sure if new cars do this ?

[@crane3]

1:39 “we got to put in in “s” for subscribe😂😂😂 I had to rewind to double check 😂

[@paulh6517]

I like "the big ass screen". I got a chuckle from that one.

[@A3A4Tom]

Just like full-size trucks, this segment is completely dominated by American. As mighty as Japanese does, they will never be able to match those of the American's strongest segment. On the same architecture, I will definitely take a Tundra instead. At least full-size truck makes more sense than SUV, when it comes to practicality. Otherwise, I will just go grab a Telluride or CX-90, if I need a 7-seating SUV.

[@mudpuppy318]

I’m a Toyota fan and It’s a nice machine but the interior layout and lack of ability to remove the rear seats kinda bugs me. I’d have to go with a Yukon XL as they have way more space

[@emmysue673]

I friggin love you guys! I've been heavily interested in this new model, like you said- that has taken forever! love your reviews! wish I could afford this! someday I'll buy a used one perhaps.

[@maqabyah2]

You guys are saying what I've kind of thought. This isn't a great deal in my opinion, especially when you consider the fuel economy here in Canada. The starting price isn't that bad for the segment

[@ph00ny1]

Is that engine noise pumped in? It seems unusually loud. I sat in one at the autoshow and my head was touching the ceiling from the second row. That caught me off guard

[@leod1671]

nice truck however , I was ready to purchase last December, however due to unavailability I purchased a GMC Yukon. Another loss for Toyota.

[@shararihamideh1608]

The interior cargo/legroom space is really disappointing due to the solid axle. Hopefully the new grand highlander will offer more space even the new honda pilot is 9 inches shorter than this and it has 27 cubic feet of extra space and the pilot third row is much higher off the ground. Hopefully the grand highlander can fix the interior space problems all the competition has more space than this

[@pearsth]

Wow....I guess I will keep my Sequoia. Great review...a lot of the intial were all gushing about how great this was when it first came out. As there were none available, I put shopping on the back burner. Coming back to it today, seems there is not point to buying this large SUV when the 4Runner is just as big inside, costs less, and gets better mileage.

[@MarkMonolithOfficial]

I love Toyota but that Yukon AT4 is hard to beat

[@anthonycalvert6165]

I’m surprised TRD suspension is so firm. Thought off road suspensions were usually softer than regular spec.

[@RyanPerlmanCooks]

I just don’t understand what they were doing with the drivetrain. I actually wish they would have tried a similar hybrid setup with the Atkinson cycle that they use in other products. Except make it a V8 with 2 large electric motors in the rear, each controlling one of the rear wheels. Feel like it would almost certainly have better fuel economy, good torque from the electric motors, and it’s not like they didn’t already compromise the space in the back so the batteries wouldn’t make too much of a difference on the back seat room.

[@tombrodzinski157]

Tundra and Sequoia are both big misses by Toyota. Tundra’s exterior and Sequoia’s interior need an overhaul. Build quality is suspect too. Nothing but problems from console rattles to engine issues with the Tundra. US plant just doesn’t live up to Toyota standards. Buy Japan build LX if you have the means otherwise look elsewhere.

[@Flying-Fox19]

Oh boy do I dislike these extra large SUVs/Truck vehicles. I only ever see one man in these and I am talking about on the weekends in the summer. A whole family should be loaded in them but are often not. Thanks for the review btw. Always entertaining to watch the both of you. Ps. Toyota needs to discontinue this and make this a limited offering only. Poor fuel mileage is a no no these days with $1.50 gas and EVs running around you.

[@IntothewestOkotoks]

Just another comment on towing…similar to half tons, you likely won’t get close to that 9000 lb tow rating. From what I can tell, the payload on the model your testing is about 1400 lbs (GVWR of 7500) definitely comparable to some half tons, but once you add people and cargo it’ll be limited for the hitch weight. Personally I wouldn’t go heavier than a 6000-6500 (unloaded) weight for a trailer.

[@GhostRider-hp3te]

Wonderful review indeed! I was waiting for this one for a while now. Thank you Andrea and Zack ❤. However after watching the full video….what A disappointment it is to see Toyota screw up so bad. I guess if they had introduced random drug tests in their R&D department this wouldn’t have happened 😅

[@shnerp]

For a TRD pro, it needs more ground clearance.

[@barrywiseman7012]

The 2002 Sequoia we had 13 yrs provided Lexus grade seats, 4.7V8, easily configured to large cargo area. The 2015 Sequoia 5.7L V8 we had 5 yrs had supreme turning radius, easy driving manners , even in town, roll down rear window, excellent seats & space in all rows for access & comfort for adults leg space & headroom (even in 3rd row- power seats which fold flat into floor), smooth ride, solid build & reliability. Better than adequate towing limits. Poor fuel economy at 15-17L/100kms ( that was ONLY downside)- which is even better than '23 Sequoia apparently produces! My advice-if you need for towing this size rig find, if you can, a well cared for previous generation Sequoia. We were asked so often if we would sell the truck when filling up at gas stations. lol. We loved both trucks, but as empty nesters now, have downsized (??) to a '22 4Runner- as mentioned by someone in comments, it has more usable space with 2nd & 3rd row folded than the new Sequoia (although the 3rd row in the 4Runner is always folded).

[@rimarcadu]

Hello , great review fellas 🥃🥃🥃🌹

[@michaelwiebe4282]

Very good, honest review, and Andrea is dressed perfectly!

[@BrickyardPowerMan]

Have a $500 deposit for a Sequoia Platinum model but just about to cancel. Going to Chicago auto show this weekend to look at the new Grand Highlander. Depending on what I think I may pursue it, otherwise I'll be ordering a Sienna. I've rented several and they aren't bad. Would prefer a bit more power as I worry how it would perform with all seats filled. That won't happen often though as it will mostly have 2 - 4 occupants. Regarding the Sequoia. The fuel economy worries me not because I'm worried about the cost but it pisses me off to buy a vehicle that says it should get X when it really gets far less than X. The rear storage space is ridiculous. Lexus LX600 doesn't offer the hybrid and its rear seat is flat - seats fold flat and there isn't a lifted platform from the batteries. I'm sure I would love a Lexus LX600 and if they don't feel the need then I really don't need it on a Sequoia.

[@DoctorSkillz]

That fuel economy is abysmal. And the ride isn't comfortable? Toyota, why you do this?!

[@pureammolite4338]

I wanted to click like? Seems anybody feels they can review cars now days and I am sorry but this one urked me! Like others, I really enjoy the parts of your videos when it seems like a couple is taking a simple test drive. It's a fresh point of view! But perhaps I felt it unfair to compare cargo space between this and a Yukon, which is 17 inches longer! That's almost 1.5 feet difference! Or compare the turning circle between a city driving Navigator and a SUV set up for off roading! And my favorite. The comparison with a Hyundai Palisades seating arrangement. The Sequoia is engineered and build with completely different larger stronger components for a different purpose. For road and serious 4WD capabilities. Underneath differential size, , suspension set up and running gear. Not to mention that full size spare tire under there! This SUV is a Sequoia update, North American Land Cruiser serious 4WD replacement, school driver/shopping vehicle, family weekend fun truck and a boulevard touring SUV when with 22 inch rims. With the world production crisis Toyota revamped one large SUV to appeal to as many consumers needs as possible. They even offer a lower trim $ Which yes, unfortunately must have a 'smaller center console screen', to widen that range of customer reach. You will see more of these on the roads than any previous Sequoia! Toyota fail? No, Toyota is being clever, and will prevail!

[@eleanormassaro5195]

Could be the cold weather is affecting the fuel economy, plus it is 472 hp! Not sure what Toyota was thinking about when configuring the second row and third row seating. It is a good looking truck on the outside though!

[@andreaspencer9813]

I love the look of it too, I just don't understand the interior configuration. It's a shame because the hybrid powertrain is great, tons of power.

[@Serious9185]

Thank you for an honest review. Subscribed!

[@TheRebuilt1]

that red interior is pimp nasty. Love the reaction even though I'm not a sequoia fan

[@user-yx4on8hx4w]

Great video,. This Just clarified reasons for us to take this vehicle off our consideration list

[@JC-et4vz]

Hi Zack, I miss your night life shots with the music. Please bring it back~~(maybe ending the video with that night shots would be a great idea)

[@gsl888]

Great review. As per usual. Good points and agree delete red. Love my Sequoia!! Totally opposite But she’s a 2010, heated rear seats, great luggage space with all 7seats occupied, last road trip 12.9l/100. Avg city 14-15. Cost 18,500 got her last year in Kelowna. She tows like a dream with 28l/100, way better than f150 eco, that gets 35l/100, same trailer same trips. Subscribed and notification on. Watch them all, great content, and ❤that you share things you like and dislike on each!!

[@GoOp790]

Motormouth reviews are so well done. Best in the business. Many thanks! Any idea when you’ll have a review of the Nissan Ariya?

[@andreaspencer9813]

Thank you very much for the kind words. We were invited on a Nissan Ariya drive event at the end of March but unfortunately, we are already booked up with a trip to New York. We will have to wait for Nissan to bring it in the press fleet in Vancouver. Probably sometime in April.

[@Motormouth...]

As soon as possible

[@maxwelltaylor7929]

They had how many years to perfect this new one… this is abismal!

[@AB-qt4dj]

Maybe they should’ve kept the Land Cruiser in North America

[@maxwelltaylor7929]

@@AB-qt4dj i agree completely

[@MichaelAllen-td1uu]

Toyota should offer the Sequoia in a non hybrid trim. Less money and more cargo room.

[@Motormouth...]

Yes, a base 3.5 turbo

[@ladas1106]

A HUGE miss by Toyota. Hybrids are just an environmental gimmick. Bring back a normally aspirated V6 or V8 with a flat cargo space. Toyota effed it up with the cargo space that's for sure. I will never buy a GM so we'll be looking at Honda/Acura.

[@Popcornbeetle]

Great review as you took Toyota to task for the terrible interior packaging. Huge truck but tiny interior practicality.

[@rogerf9613]

Great review. Agreed. A rare, big miss by Toyota. Hopefully Grand Highlander to the rescue!

[@jadefreier8084]

Did you actually check the fuel economy or just go off of what the dash is telling you?

[@alxdava2004]

Could be such a difference?!

[@nlken7175]

2022 Tundra was the big fail. Then Toyota made this from a Tundra.

[@janoycresnova9156]

Why was Tundra a big fail?

[@clearcut6818]

when they list 12.6 l/100 km but can only get 20 l/100 km, can we sue for fraud advertising?

[@gs98999]

No, because it achieves 12.6L using the test every other vehicle uses. Any vehicle can double fuel consumption under specific conditions. Our old odyssey used to vary from 18L/100kms Down to 8L/100kms depending on where and how we drove it.

[@mrhankey20]

I was looking forward to this release and then I saw how small the third seat and storage area was. Those are the reasons I am about to buy a Tahoe instead. I wish that wasn't the case.

[@waynemcconnell4559]

Great overall video on the new GAS PIG anyways I am not impressed with the no car camping and you indicated the gmc Yukon and Chevrolet suburban are #1 and # 2 choice are best overall in the 3.0 diesel however there is problems with that motor 1 being cost of fuel and cost of DEF added #2 Gas vs diesel prices are all over the map #3 Diesel are more expensive on maintenance # 4 gas turbos are expensive to replace and myself like aspirated V-6 or V-8 non turbo. #5 I love my 2023 4Runner! and it’s all I need. PS if I want to pull a trailer I will use my 7.3 diesel anytime you want to do a bumper pull!

[@ronripley9197]

I just can't understand why the fuel mileage numbers are half of what is published by the EPA or the Canadian equivalent! In some of your past reviews, you were able to match or even exceed the published numbers! Is there a problem with this specific vehicle? Did you express your concerns to Toyota when you returned the vehicle to them, and if so, what was Toyota's response,?