We caught the live stream just as you were waiting for it to come back, so managed to catch the landing. I was intrigued, so I read up about it. On Flight Radar it was showing it off the coast of Cornwall making pretty patterns before coming back. If we'd known it was going to happen, we'd have hot footed it to Sheldon. We're just in Nuneaton. That would have been amazing 😊 Another one for you to be proud of!
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Maureen , it certainly is a rare sight 👍
@lizsavage9730Ай бұрын
Wow I have never seen this plane before. Thank you for filming it.😁
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Liz 👍
@davidcartwright5591Ай бұрын
An unusual looking but very effective airborne early warning platform . The Aussies have operated these for a few years and have one based in Eastern Europe . A great catch Kev , one to remember , and one for the history books .
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks David 👍
@JK-zx3goАй бұрын
Interesting for the pilots in a crosswind. That runway is like the big dipper at Blackpool.
@MilitaryAircraftVideosАй бұрын
Well caught, the RAFs first Wedgetail of x3 ordered still partly in primer green!
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thank you MilitaryAircraftVideos 👍
@a7m4sumАй бұрын
Amazing capture. Glad you captured this, I missed the stream on that day. Thank you Kevin 😊
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Abdurrahman 👍
@barrywood5357Ай бұрын
Such a change from when it went in great work to all involved
@johncotton2272Ай бұрын
What a great capture well done Kev
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks John 👍
@S4M134R1WАй бұрын
No way I just seen the time in the video i literally just took the dog for a walk just before this 😫😂 typical! The livery reminds me of the Aston Martin f1
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Sods law S4M 👍
@S4M134R1WАй бұрын
@@AirportAction always the way 😂
@tonynewton1325Ай бұрын
Hi Kev this is the new Ryanair variant with outside coach seats
@AirportActionАй бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Don't give Michael O'Leary any ideas Tony , he loves a windowless seat 🤣
@bigmac60Ай бұрын
😂
@davetrousersАй бұрын
@@bigmac60 It's a plane not a coach
@captainbligh3894Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@GeorgeMCMLIXАй бұрын
Great coverage of its departure & arrival, Kev 👍🏻 I followed it on FR24 as it was on manoeuvres off the Cornish coast. Keep up the great work 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks George 👍
@drsmith6595Ай бұрын
Another great catch today Kev. Thank you for being there 👍
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Dr Smith 👍
@jowolvoАй бұрын
Wow what a treat to see this
@seanavery7265Ай бұрын
Well done. Wow you got too see the wedge bird.
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Sean , the whole reason for the channel is so we all enjoy what's going on at the airports. 👍
@carolyn2130Ай бұрын
Wow! Way cool!! Never seen one of these before!! Thank you for sharing this ❣️
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Carolyn 👍
@vitality397Ай бұрын
nicely captured kev
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thank you so much Vitality for your very generous OFF Stream Superchat , we really appreciate your support watching the streams , thank you Vitality 👍
@ronh3424Ай бұрын
@@AirportAction your welcome kev👍
@robertbate5790Ай бұрын
Fantastic catch Kev. Didnt see it but heard it, without knowing of course. I was in Chelmsley square. So near yet, . . . . Lol 🤣 👍👍👍👍. Definitely one for the modellers records. Get a copyright quick. 👍👍
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Robert 👍
@kevinburden781Ай бұрын
I wonder how many 747 deliveries recently have had the parts for this plane .This is the first of the two second hand planes then RAF will get. I think the last 3 of the 5 are actually built on brand new 737 , but not MAX just NG Specification. From RAF Website... The E-7 Wedgetail AEW Mk1 is the RAF’s successor to the E-3D Sentry and will provide a 5th Generation Airborne Early Warning and Control capability (AEW&C), with a Multi-role Electronically Scanned Array (MESA), that is interoperable and interchangeable with key allies.
@kevinburden781Ай бұрын
Based at RAF Lossiemouth , Not Brize Norton as are the 737 Poseidon MRA1( Maritime Patrol Aircraft)
@laurencejones5707Ай бұрын
None. The 747 freight flights originate in China and, even if there were parts to be sourced, there are prohibitions on American companies sourcing from China for military contracts. The order was reduced to 3. The other two are in the STS hangar at BHX. All are second hand airframes.
@kevinburden781Ай бұрын
@@laurencejones5707 You wonder why the US military thing we're no longer a first-tier service (UK MOD) anymore. We can't even afford the E-7 we budgeted for.
@johnedwards3198Ай бұрын
Second hand????
@MarkHarrison-xy7jgАй бұрын
What is in the box on the top??
@derekporter7658Ай бұрын
The flying blackboard/Cleaver making it's debut for the UK. That's a very undulating runway 😵💫
@andrewbennett7756Ай бұрын
Fantastic aircraft
@sandervanderkammen9230Ай бұрын
@@andrewbennett7756 The Boeing 737 is the most successful jet aircraft in the history of aviation.
@katekempson4191Ай бұрын
Gutted I missed this as i was getting the house ready for my birthday tomorrow. Great catch Kev ✈️
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Happy birthday for tomorrow Kate , have a great day ! 🥳
@lagunsmooseАй бұрын
Great catch, I've yet to see one of these in flight! 😗👍
@Speedmaster1200-d8uАй бұрын
great spotting mate
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Speedmaster 👍
@howiejohnsonimages1861Ай бұрын
Yesterday was an awesome stream Kev, Michelle and Chloe, one of the most exciting I have watched. King and Queen and more, Read today that that was the maiden flight of the Wedgetail, so you got something really special. From take off to tracking and waiting, would it land back at BHX or not, great coverage as ever. Blessings
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks for being part of an historic , exciting stream Howie . Incredible scenes at BHX yesterday 👍
@inkysquid4Ай бұрын
Wing wave too!!
@AirportActionАй бұрын
😍
@planespottingcricketer58Ай бұрын
that's so cool
@Tdog-k6xАй бұрын
Cool 737
@OskarmineproАй бұрын
Well done for capturing I managed to see this myself too!
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Oskar , great you was there for it as well 👍
@dhouse-d5lАй бұрын
Wow, would love to see the wind tunnel smoke test of that in action, wonder how it compares to the Sentry saucer setup.
@lutomson3496Ай бұрын
Was thinking the same
@shawnerz98Ай бұрын
Very nice catch! I like the name: "The Wedgie!"
@m19c65Ай бұрын
Hi. I saw this coming over Bristol heading to Fairford i belive on its way back from Exeter, what a sight
@AirportActionАй бұрын
👍
@wesfreemantle5984Ай бұрын
This aircraft has come into London Southend Airport today for painting
@Wendy-B09Ай бұрын
Wow i missed this😮
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Luckily we captured it for you and everyone to enjoy Wendy 👍
@Wendy-B09Ай бұрын
Great to see kev,thankyou😊
@rocknroll527Ай бұрын
Brilliant.
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks rocknroll 👍
@andrewfoster259Ай бұрын
How cool
@shanedavis9166Ай бұрын
Not sure if it's the radar fin catching the wind, whether or not it was relatively light or what, but I noticed on t/o and landing, it seems quite unstable. I know there was a x-wind but even so, it still looked a handful.
@AirportActionАй бұрын
I thought the same Shane , there was a bit of crosswind , so i guess that hitting a big sail like it's radar is going to impact it somewhat 👍
@ianstewartaviation2634Ай бұрын
Great catch
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Ian 👍
@AwesomeFullHDvideosАй бұрын
well done
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thank you 👍
@ClaudiaUnfilteredАй бұрын
First testflight of the new transit system skymonorails maglev, soon there will a fleet of these taking to the sky. And have highspeed maglev connecting London and New York in less than three hour compared flight time of 8 hours today!
@anthonyhill8061Ай бұрын
wow wish i saw it.....
@NigelsModellingBenchАй бұрын
WOW!! She's beautiful!!
@ianlitchfield9273Ай бұрын
What ? Its ugly.
@ronpeterson680Ай бұрын
Good afternoon to. U. From Canada
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Hi Ron 👍
@vincentobrien4314Ай бұрын
Be interesting to know what it's for. Great filming and commentary Kev.
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Vincent 👍The Boeing E-7 Wedgetail, also marketed as the Boeing 737 AEW&C, is a twin-engine airborne early warning and control aircraft based on the Boeing 737 Next Generation design
@vincentobrien4314Ай бұрын
@@AirportAction Thank you for the info. I bet your camera was not the only one interested in filming this today. Not just for pleasure either
@AirportActionАй бұрын
@@vincentobrien4314 👀👀👀 Spotters everywhere Vincent 😂
@reecom9884Ай бұрын
The RAF couldn’t wait to get the Boeing 737-700 Wedgetail and told Boeing to forget about painting it, just deliver it, we’ll paint it!
@sarahpurplefaceАй бұрын
Was this its first ever flight? Wow!
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Hi Sarah , yes it's first ever flight since the conversion 👍
@NathenmooresАй бұрын
I never get to the that all I see is a400m beach texan black hawks some times the reds c17 eurofighter German a330 airforce about 31thousand feet in the air but that's a sight to see it looks new too
@CentroClass323Ай бұрын
I think there's 3 of them. WT002 and WT003 which are also there.
@grantmiller6570Ай бұрын
1. It'd be dynamite in a cross wind. 2. On the runway made by Disneyworld roller coaster manufacturers.
@madjock2878Ай бұрын
Wedgetail AEW Mk1 is the correct term no E7 nonsense on the Mil Registry
@Orbital_InclinationАй бұрын
Either will do, and more than likely it'll be referred to as either E-7 or Wedgetail by the people that operate it, in the same way P-8 and Poseidon are both commonly used
@madjock2878Ай бұрын
@@Orbital_Inclination Weegtail ? They may be refered to but the legal name is that. Also E3Ds being refered to as AWACS was incorrect in RAF service and the Seniors frowned apon it Their legal designation was Sentry AEW Mk1 as all paperwork refered to them
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
The correct term is _Boeing 737 AEW&C_ It goes by many military designations around the world but they are all Boeing 737 AEW&Cs
@madjock2878Ай бұрын
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Correct nn of this E7 rubbish
@Orbital_InclinationАй бұрын
@@madjock2878why are you getting so worked up over the designation of an aircraft? Quiet day?
@TheRobbexАй бұрын
Bonus: Female Hen Harrier passes left to right at 3.32 ish.
@RLVIDEOS2024Ай бұрын
😮
@dabrabАй бұрын
With aircraft they say if it looks right it is right... This just looks weird but there again the ill-fated AEW Nimrod wasn't much of a looker!
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
The Nimrod was a mess... a good example of where the British aircraft industry was headed..
@MarkAldrich74Ай бұрын
If Weatherspoons did planes! The toilets are outside & upstairs! 😂
@AirportActionАй бұрын
🤣🤣
@kippamipАй бұрын
Next stop paint shop.
@MidnightVisionsАй бұрын
Why is a factory unpainted Boeing flying in the UK?
@AirportActionАй бұрын
The conversion has taken place at BHX , once everything is passed off , it will then go to get it's full paint job 👍
@ricky1231Ай бұрын
The RAF needs at least seven of these Wedge tails instead of three ordered The politicians always try to do defense on a shoe string & end up costing the country billions more 😅
@Orbital_InclinationАй бұрын
@@ricky1231 why seven? What's that number based on?
@stevem-h3562Ай бұрын
@@Orbital_Inclination Two deployable if needed at any one time Two for QRA - at least one to be part of the declared assets to NATO for Air Policing for the UK Air Defence Region and the other to cover it if it goes U/S Two to be in maintenance at any one time Plus a spare. Ricky is right, there should be a fleet of at least 7. 3 is just a joke. You might as well not bother, you'll end up working those airframes into the ground and in less than 15 years you'll be having to buy them all over again. but thats typical MOD. Manned by effing idiots who couldnt find their arses with both hands and a GPS.
@Orbital_InclinationАй бұрын
@@stevem-h3562 E-7 isn't a QRA asset, and Sentry wasn't either. The entire UK FIR is covered by land-based radar, and there's a whole load of other kit spotting aircraft further out. Even if it was (which is isn't), that would only require 1x aircraft for the task, on standby. Our RJ fleet operates on 1x available, 1x reserve/forward maint, 1x depth maint, and covers all taskings. Working airframes into the ground isn't an hours issue as such (our RJ fleet were tankers previously, and fly a lot) but a mid-life extension/depth issue. That's what bit the E-3D in the arse and got the fleet grounded before it went out of service. Plus we have the combined AEW&C fleets of NATO for major conflicts, training, etc etc. The last time we fought alone was in the Falklands, where we didn't even use fixed wing AEW&C.
@androidr.8470Ай бұрын
This is most obvious a conversion from a passenger jet. Who flew the airframe prior?
@Orbital_InclinationАй бұрын
It was a Boeing Business Jet, then operated by a Chinese business jet provider, before returning to US registration
@standurham2525Ай бұрын
I heard that the Aussies first got these in 2009. I never even knew the Wedgie existed until now. Nice one AA👍
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Ian 👍
@justin1669Ай бұрын
It is named after the Australian Wedgetail Eagle. An early morning predator.
@standurham2525Ай бұрын
@@justin1669 didn’t know that 👍
@charlieroberts7775Ай бұрын
Mate we have had them for about 15 or so years. AWACS of choice in the middle east, Turkey and South Korea also operate them. You guys and the US are just playing catch up
@standurham2525Ай бұрын
@@charlieroberts7775 that’s our government for you…mate.
@rohsek7298Ай бұрын
That is a goofy looking plane 😂😂
@AirportActionАй бұрын
🤣
@davidkearney7142Ай бұрын
Is that easyjet's idea of a joke, putting a bus stop on a plane 😂😂😂😂😂
@johngraver2828Ай бұрын
It looks like a Pop-Top . . . .
@AirportActionАй бұрын
🤣
@matthewhoney362Ай бұрын
Don't think it likes side winds!
@1chishАй бұрын
This hasn't just been stored at Birmingham. STS Aviation take a standard NG and convert it to a Wedgetail for the RAF. A lot of british kit goes into this aircraft. And there are two others under conversion. Just IMHO but we should have never started the Nimrod MRA4 and bought new stripped out A320 aircraft and fitted all the kit that was going into the MRA4. And this sort of proves the point.
@sharla82Ай бұрын
Exactly a real shame the RAF, MOD & BAE were so obsessed with updating a decades old plane, when a new A320 military version could have been sold around the world. This would have been a rival for the 737 Poseidon
@1chishАй бұрын
@@sharla82 Indeed although in fairness BAE did explain the difficulties of putting computer built wings onto hand crafted 40 year old fuselages It not only lost us a hard won leading edge in a key and growing area we lost the export potential and worse had to buy in from the USA. Typical story of a UK Government up cock.
@stevem-h3562Ай бұрын
Yeh, kind of but different horses for different courses. We should have never signed off on MRA4, that was Portillo having his plonker pulled by BAe. The solution that should have been taken then should have been the Marconi one which involved pulling P3 Orions out of the Arizona desert and fitting them out with a decent mission suite. Muh more deliverable than BAe's half-a**ed moneyprinting exercise. In so far as the Wedgetail was concerned, the problem was that the RAF, during that most important phase following the introduction of the New Management System in 1994-5, post Cold War, didnt look after the E3D's like they should have done and kept on pleading poverty and missing out on the mid-life maintenance and upgrade programmes and just plainly didnt look after the kit which is why other nation's E3's are still flying and ours are a pile of junk and having to be replaced with something significantly smaller, involving more expense and frankly, probably nowhere near as long-range deployable as the E3's were and certainly nowhere near as flexible operationally. Nice work for STS and it keeps Boeing's mitts off the programme outside of supplying the airframe, but... it shouldnt have been necessary. And having served from 83-99 and seen the E3D's come into service, worked with them on many occasions and seeing how the airframes were treated.... I can see how the ended up the way they did.
@1chishАй бұрын
@@stevem-h3562 Well I am 90% with you. However in fairness to BAe when the Government decided on a specific aircraft (which became the MRA4) rather than extra kitted MR2 BAe in 1986 offered the Airbus A310 as a project. When I suggested the A320 it reflected how slow this project had been (over ten years) to even get sign off. If anything it was the Governments of the day that forced BAe to offer a Nimrod version not BAe 'pulling things'. Not sure the Orion was viable because put simply at that time the UK surveillance kits was more advanced than any other and old turboprops rather than new jet engines? There was even disagreement within LM about its reliability and viability.
@stevem-h3562Ай бұрын
@@1chish Points taken, but one must consider that the USN, the dutch, the Germans and the French continued to use Turboprop driven Atlantiques and P3's for many years until the P8 became available. There would have been nothing wrong in putting the UK LRMPA mission kit in a refreshed P3 for the UK requirement. Just being a jet would not and should not be a dictatorial part of the requirement. If that particular Air Staff Requirement for the replacement of the Shackleton stated that it should be jet only (and I'm pretty sure it wasnt), then that would have been daft. But, MOD are known for their dumb decisions, particularly in procurement.
@andrewbennett7756Ай бұрын
Wel ihope theydoa better job than the max8
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
The Boeing 737 is the most successful jet aircraft in history, more than 15 THOUSAND 737s sold!!!!
@ronpeterson680Ай бұрын
Outhouse??? On the plane
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Radar Ron 👍
@Ralph2Ай бұрын
It looks all wrong aerodynamically but clearly not and a clever design. Thanks!
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Thanks Ralph 👍
@davecooper3238Ай бұрын
Did I see a raptor fly across at around 3.46 ?
@professorpopkissАй бұрын
Not sure if it was a Buzzard or an Eagle!!!!!?
@terregarobАй бұрын
Buzzard.
@davecooper3238Ай бұрын
@@terregarob Thought it looked like a Buzzard. They nest in the wood out the back. An Eagle? As far as I am aware not a single Eagle anywhere near BHX.
@peterblackmore7560Ай бұрын
Named after the Wedgetail Eagle - an indigenous Australian bird.
@WilhelmKarsten4 күн бұрын
@@peterblackmore7560 Boeing E-7.. the logical successor to the E-6.
@steveibbotson5687Ай бұрын
Ozi ozi ozi, oi oi oi....
@michaeltaylor8835Ай бұрын
Off to the Ukraine
@mickyday2008Ай бұрын
Secret squirrel stuff
@sallyc2593Ай бұрын
What? Why?? How???
@AirportActionАй бұрын
🤣 , This RAF aircraft has been under cover in the STS Hanger for several years , today was it's test flight
@sallyc2593Ай бұрын
@@AirportAction Passed with flying colours! What a strange sight, it doesn’t look very aerodynamic but hey, it took off, flew around and landed again, so what do I know!🤣
@AirportActionАй бұрын
@@sallyc2593 🤣 It certainly does Sally
@TheTurboClubАй бұрын
@@AirportActionis it brand new or something??
@AirportActionАй бұрын
@@TheTurboClub Just over 14 years old , but it was only delivered to the RAF in March 2021 . Since then it's been at BHX getting converted 👍
@DigitalDiabloUKАй бұрын
Was that a kestrel at 3:32?
@AirportActionАй бұрын
Either a Kestrel or Buzzard 👍
@Bradleygdyjh02Ай бұрын
Maybe a kite? (Im not sure if I spelled it right)
@christopherrobinson7541Ай бұрын
@@AirportAction Buzzard, bigger.
@RatzfourtyfourАй бұрын
Looks like a bad design decision in regards of crosswind.
@alanmartin1949Ай бұрын
I've just read the Wikipedia page for this aircraft and especially the young - but already helter-skelter - use of it for the UK => "we'd like 5 please, no make that 3, but maybe later we'll go back to 5, but we're not sure!?" Somethings never change - back in the 1970s, I worked on the Nimrod AEW3 for several years, which the UK Government in their wisdom (or lack thereof) eventually cancelled and bought Boeing E-3 Sentry aircraft instead! Obviously we are sticking to Boeing! By the way back then I worked at Hawker-Siddeley @ Woodford - which was closed in 2011 then flattened and is now in the process of being turned into a massive housing estate! It's not much wonder that we have to rely on Boeing for such aircraft! 😒😒👎👎
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
Britain was never a real leader in aviation and its aircraft industry was doomed after the countries defeat in WW2.. it was a long slow death to the point where Britian no longer makes its own jet aircraft anymore..
@stevem-h3562Ай бұрын
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke "Britain was never a real leader in aviation and its aircraft industry was doomed after the countries defeat in WW2" Absolutely not true. The story of what happened to Britains aviation industry, thanks to the actions of the political classes during the 1960's in particular is well documented. While the American industry was emergent in the late 40's early 50s, the British, in the early 1950s were pound for pound very much pushing the boundaries. Im afraid you're talking bollox.
@stevem-h3562Ай бұрын
Dunno about lack of wisdom, AEW3 should never even have been attempted, it was bloody useless. I was serving with 11Group at the time in the RAF and we were carrying out trials with AEW3 and compared to the E3, it was like chalk and cheese. The E3 was miles and miles better. All AEW3 and MRA4 were about was how many times BAe could get away with selling the same reheated, rehashed sh*t to the MOD without being caught. Nimrod in its MR1 and MR2 iterations was a worldbeater. But by the time it came round to AEW3 and MRA4, it was done, it had had its time and should never even have been considered. Mind you, the way that BAE behaved towards Woodford once the MRA4 deal was canned was abominable. But thats BAe for you. They dont give a **** and they never did. All they gave a damn about was rinsing the MOD for money. The only thing British about them is the B in their name. We shouldnt even buy a bloody paperclip from BAe, but they've got too many politicians and MOD Civil Serpents in the IPT's in their pockets.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
@@stevem-h3562 In terms of overall aviation technology, (fixed-wing aircraft were invented in the USA) the Americans and the Germans were years ahead of the British before the war began. By wars end the UK aircraft industry was really struggling to stay relevant and increasing relied on government aid, this is proven out by the lower performance of British aircraft, their lack of popularity among operators and the number of British companies that ceased to exist after the war. Without nationalization the UK aircraft industry would have completely collapsed 30 years sooner than it did. cheers mate!
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
@@stevem-h3562 You wrote quote; _"Nimrod in its MR1 and MR2 iterations was a worldbeater."_ There does not appear to be any evidence to support that claim... Several countries trialed the Nimrod or had interest in buying, but they all bought other aircraft instead. The Lockheed P-3 was hugely successful compared to the Nimrod and is still in service today.
@jonrobinson8005Ай бұрын
Not a bad piece of Aussie ingenuity, take a piece of high tech equipment and plonk it on top of an average Joe civilian aircraft and give it some extra bells and whistles for good measure.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
American technology... Australia doesn't make jet aircraft anymore.
@jonrobinson8005Ай бұрын
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Australian concept and spec. Didn’t say Australia built it, a bit hard when the factories are in the US 14000+ km away.😉
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
@@jonrobinson8005 Then why did you say? > quote; _"Not a bad piece of Aussie ingenuity"_ ???
@jonrobinson8005Ай бұрын
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke because the meaning of “ingenuity” is the skill of thinking, performing, or using things in new ways.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerkeАй бұрын
@@jonrobinson8005 But Boeing is not an Australian company...