Can A US Navy Coordinated ToT Strike Beat An S-400 & Pantsir IADS? (WarGames 65) | DCS

Vs S400 Series:
Tossing Nukes vs S-400 IADS: • Could Pakistan Beat In...
MLRS vs S-400: • Can HIMARS MLRS, APC, ...
USN ToT Strike vs S-400 IADS: • Can A US Navy Coordina...
Kh-47M2 Kinzhal vs S-400 IADS: • Russian Kh-47M2 Kinzha...
Sweden & Star Wars vs S-400 IADS: • Could Swedish SEAD or ...
WWI, WWII & Stealth vs S-400 IADS: • Could WWI, WWII Or Ste...
USAF 4th Gen Strike vs S-400 IADS: • Could A USAF Strike Be...
Different USAF Bombers vs S-400: • Which Aircraft Can Pen...
S-400 Mod: drive.google.com/file/d/1tI1L...
Other Mods: • Free DCS Mods
0:00 Overview
1:16 Details
3:10 Tomahawks Without Decoys
5:03 Details 2
6:42 Predictions
8:52 Take Off & Time On Target
23:42 Firing Weapons
SPONSORS
Winwing Store: wwsimstore.com/STORE
Sponsor Reviews: • Sponsor Reviews
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (KZbin): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZbin): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
OTHER
CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#WarGames #GRWarGames #USN #Decoy #Tomahawk #S400 #SAM #Russia #DCSQuestioned #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military

[@grimreapers]

Vs S400 Series: Tossing Nukes vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aqK7i5SOqJ6YiJo MLRS vs S-400: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpiki3uDoaiBfNk USN ToT Strike vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqS1aKyknqlsi68 Kh-47M2 Kinzhal vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/epvGgqGoq7J7mKM Sweden & Star Wars vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWSTZISkobuipJI WWI, WWII & Stealth vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIrahoR9pLSGq5o USAF 4th Gen Strike vs S-400 IADS: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z6C0aXxmZaqhmaM Different USAF Bombers vs S-400: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l3TWk6KFfJWEi5Y

[@appalachianamerican2075]

That last kill wasn't from the S-400, that was Tom Cruise using the scietologolical force to exact his revenge.

[@DDGVET4]

For what? Not making Top Gun II sooner?

[@AndySpicer]

That was a wonderfully planned and executed suicide mission. Well done!

[@castlekingside76]

Russia has overlapping SAM coverage right now in Ukraine. S400/S300 etc. They haven't provided much protection against cruise missles and other aircraft. There's no way Russian troops would be this capable. Apparently Ukraine targets the radar systems and not the launchers. I like these simulations in terms of showing what Russian crews could do when trained under NATO standard. Secondly, Russian SAMS have shot down their own jets and SAM launchers. Literally shot themselves. Video on here of it.

[@Eo_Tunun]

It's the typical russian overselling of the capabillities. The Moskva's S-300 search radar wasn't able to detect the two incoming missiles at all, as was evident from the tracking radar's antenna still being in the off-position when the power failed. The first thing the crew will have known about being under attack was when the first missile went *Bang!*

[@user-qn3xu5ee3t]

Any statistics or that is just your pure fantasy?

[@toetagjeee]

@@user-qn3xu5ee3t Russian sources are angry cause they cannot intercept HIMARS shooting up your precious warehouses. Btw. Putin Khuilo.

[@chichotwojay740]

Except that US analysts say the exact opposite. That Russian air defences are virtually impossible to overcome, and that they are actually operating with great proficiency in Ukraine.

[@ghostfacegrillah7891]

@@chichotwojay740 Which is why literally everyone involved in that conflict is flying somewhere close to 50 meters off the ground

[@gregelliott2165]

I think the TALDs were so bunched up (except for Grump's lovely spread) that a single Growler took out the lot of them. The planning was exceptional, execution was classic GR. Another fun video, well done.

[@gl1500ctv]

"The defense department regrets to inform you that your sons are dead because they were stupid." - RIP Goose

[@Davros-vi4qg]

Might have missed this…. Why are cruise missiles at 5000ft?!? More like 50ft rl. Which means S400 gets about 20 miles or approx 3 minutes to react.

[@krismurphy7711]

The ENTIRE PURPOSE of the Tomahawks is to do NOE...Nap Of the Earth terrrain following at the lowest altitude possible.

[@duthimer219]

I think that was ASL not AGL

[@ser43_OLDC]

Just DCS programing, no cruise misile is flying at his lowest altitude

[@Davros-vi4qg]

Shipwrecks have terrain following. Freakin’ cruise missiles don’t. Mmm… sim or propaganda tool!?!

[@grimreapers]

Don;t know but we can't control it.

[@mikeck4609]

Good job and great video. It’s a shame though that DCS can’t model actual EW warfare (nor could they since even 30 year old capabilities are still classified). One would never attack a site like this without EW support. With it, it’s quite manageable with a good plan. EW significantly degrades the range at which targets can be Engagaed AND creates even more false contacts. It wouldn’t see 72 TALDS and 20 missles 150 miles out. If would see static or nothing until -at a range much closer than it has in a “clean environment”, it sees hundreds of contacts approaching quickly. Wouldn’t need to launch many TALDS. I’m reality, the TALDS arent designed to be targets to overwhelm. They are designed to “stimulate” the air defense system to turn on and track so it can be located, fixed and either destroyed with JSOW, JASM low observable munitions or suppressed with HARMS.

[@SukhoyBoy4113]

Cope

[@mixit2413]

Well there is no reason why DCS couldn't model EW it would be an estimate as are many thing are already in the game I doubt the coding would be that hard.

[@OldFartGrows]

The mission failed, but the banter won the day

[@KortanaDCS]

You know, the worst bit is that this is without Skynet integration... It is gonna get a whole lot meaner soon 😈

[@grimreapers]

ooooOOO eek

[@timothysalmon2259]

The goat ears made me snort coffee until it came out of my eyes! Funny.

[@thesquirejoosh4088]

absolutely gorgeous mission but would love to see something similar with weegens as the TOT with their waypoint systems is my favorite.

[@grimreapers]

We did a ToT with Weegans on this one but we didn't use the waypoints: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWSTZISkobuipJI

[@thesquirejoosh4088]

@@grimreapers still awesome thanks!!

[@Wintelburst]

This was very entertaining.

[@saintuk70]

This is good stuff.....just like lovely haggis and black pudding. Love it.

[@RuralSurvivalLLC]

Funniest video yet! Thank you!

[@Anarchy_420]

22:38 wham bam thank you mam😂

[@johnvoytko2424]

Scotty: my wife's thighs are like thrashers...i need it dial it back. Killing me

[@johnvoytko2424]

Lol..That's what i meant. Sorry drinking, laughing and texting is dangerous combination.

[@michaelmcpherson5406]

Love the show!

[@randalljones4370]

I realize the typical GR battleplan involving decoys goes something like "cram as many deck-ducks under the Bogs' wings then blaze in to under a klick and blaze with gunz'.... but wouldn't it make more sense to try something with a little more standoff potential (e.g. the AGM-88E)? It was the Desert Storm way of doing things. I think you could still get 6 TALDs underwing plus a couple AGM-88's. If you can get within 50 miles then let the AGMs loose. No need to make the face take it on the chin.

[@seanpreston3653]

I realize that's a take my word thing👊👊. A honest man's pillow is his peace of mind

[@jasonvick55]

“That’s one good thing about the S-400, is we can see it, seeing us. So, if we can see it, seeing us, then we know…it can see us” - Cap Love Caps words of wisdom 😉🤣

[@WhiteHatH4x0r]

That DCS skin looks amazing 😻

[@EvolvedTactical]

I loved watching this video. Lots of coordination, well executed. Congrats, even if the stupid S400 is stupid. And for the record, there are still Legacy Hornets in the US inventory. Thr Marine Corps has refused to get Super Bugs, instead waiting to eventually switch all their Hornet squadrons for Fz35s.

[@grimreapers]

thx

[@AdamWalkLikeSuicide]

Good effort. Need more cruise missiles.

[@Anarchy_420]

U.S. Navy VS Iranian Attack! Drone Sworm! Silkworms with Flack Guns defending and Iranian air to air F-14's protection! Iranian anti ship F-14's, Iranian UH-1H's, and Boghammars all attacking together! VS U.S. Carrier Fleet! U.S. Carrier Fleet has additional Iowa Class Battleship, Helicopters on support ships, and Human Pilots fly F-18 Super Hornet's starting in air!👍

[@DirtyHairy1]

NATO Headquarters: "Write that down! WRITE THAT DOWN!!"

[@chrispage9973]

The 16th is my birthday! Super rad!

[@holdmybeer3931]

Fck the long eared goat thing made me laugh😂😂😂😂

[@grimreapers]

Stop pulling those dang ears!

[@johnhodgson4216]

I am just waiting for the 500 missile attack and 500 decoys deployed.

[@Unknown-th8hx]

Interesting

[@jaxompol224]

harms would be good mixed in with the bogs hit from different directions even 2 extra bogs shooting would maybe tip the balence.

[@theafro]

I've got a fail-proof strategy for an aircraft to get right up to an s-400 system, but it involves several hundred miles of taxiing, and looking at GR's previous history of that kind of thing, it's probably not a go-er. Maybe Matrix can get in there, like only an RAF pilot could, only climbing when he has to put his wheels down.

[@grimreapers]

lol rgr

[@Stoney3K]

*attempts to taxi a combat aircraft several miles into an S-400 site* *gets overtaken on the motorway by an S-400 supply truck and some confused Russians behind the wheel.*

[@theafro]

@@Stoney3K Judging by recent evidence, getting russian trucks anywhere might be more difficult than it first appears..

[@schweizerluchs7146]

9:45 Not entirely true. Only US Navy have retired their Legacy Hornet fleet. Legacy Hornets are still being used by the USMC. They are gonna upgrade and keep them till around 2030 in Service!

[@grimreapers]

thx

[@cannon3267]

fun videos, love watching you guys try diong it the hard way. real world war, would run a few himars up to the saudi boarder and level the place. S-400/300, as seen reciently in ukraine, are defenseless against small surface to surface rockets.

[@dexlab7539]

Do you have a source for your claim? I haven’t heard of any HIMARS destroying S400s. I have heard or at least 4 HIMARS being destroyed by Russia in Ukraine though!

[@timblack6422]

It’s a great night!

[@ryanpayne7707]

2:42: Yes, RQ-170. And yes, anti-satellite missiles.

[@mikesmith-wk7vy]

just starting the game got the f16 on sale , should i get the Logitech x56 Hotas or the x52 or the cheaper thrustmaster t16000m

[@blueberrywilbur315]

Damn even the Russian bots got butt hurt about this🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@zacleaning7941]

I can’t wait to meat you guys at Rita

[@grimreapers]

rgr

[@ryanpayne7707]

May I make a suggestion? Modern day WWII style SAS raid. Make an S400 site with its ground defenses in Arma 3. Fly either a Huey or C-130 (in DCS) as close to the S400 as you can and either land or airdrop a few vehicles. However far you are from the site in DCS is how far your insertion point is in Arma. Make your way there on the ground, demo the site, and then try to extract.

[@grimreapers]

agreed

[@Michael-rg7mx]

There was a 70's TV show about the special forces in jeeps. They had machine guns mounted on pedestal. They ran around north Africa during the first years of ww2.

[@HauntedXXXPancake]

B2 : "If you Navy Boys 'bout done playing grab-ass down there, I'm ready to show you what 16 times 1.2 Megatons can do, Yeeeehaw ! ... Over."

[@seanpreston3653]

And just a thought, fire half payload from one vector and half from another and at different altitude . Fire low fire high of course death mission

[@brianstrandberg9346]

Need to do this in a hilly area so you can use terrain making to get there.

[@meltonkentjr1226]

Cap, I enjoy the videos you guys (and gal, Kortana!...lol) put out and would like to see if ya'll would redo a video from a while back. The video was about the movie, "Red Dawn", which I watched as a kid. I believe that the mission debrief was considered 50/50 because The Wolverines were evacuated but the other parameters of the mission wasn't successful. Could your Team redo that mission and see if we could defeat the Reds and regain our country? Thanks a bunch!

[@loganstevens2411]

Cap, in regards to the US still using Legacy Hornets anymore; the USN strictly uses all Super Hornets and F-35s, but there are still a handful of USMC squadrons flying Legacy Hornets. However they are being replaced by F-35s as well.

[@grimreapers]

thx

[@chetnash5991]

Nice idea. How many more decoys would you need to overcome the site?

[@chetnash5991]

Decoys cost less than jets and pilots. Time to build more

[@1966babysnakes]

Haa haa... the goat!

[@torjones1701]

"And Pakistan has something special up their sleeve." That's an odd place to keep it...

[@ohiobrian8993]

As a USAF EW specialist, you are not using USAF, RAF, or NATO tactics. You start with F18 Growlers

[@AB-ng7go]

and russian EW would have neutralized all your EW

[@grimreapers]

Agree BUT offensive EW not modelled in the simulation.

[@ChucksSEADnDEAD]

@@AB-ng7go how does that work?

[@AB-ng7go]

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD you never heard of jamming?

[@ChucksSEADnDEAD]

@@AB-ng7go Jamming doesn't neutralize EW. And jamming in itself creates a beacon for missiles to switch to home-on-jam. An EA-6B was almost shot down at a training range by a F-14 Tomcat because they wanted to test the AIM-54 Phoenix on two drones while being radar jammed. The first Phoenix tracked the drone despite jamming so it worked fine. The second Phoenix detected the source of the jamming and instead of heading for the second target drone, it automatically switched to home-on-jam and started heading towards the EA-6B. They had to shut down the jammer and fly away from the area because even the inert missile would have crashed into the aircraft at supersonic speed and destroyed it.

[@UkDave3856]

Fiendish Kortana

[@shmevan_]

Poor Simba Wimba 😢😭😢😭🤣🤣🤣

[@shmevan_]

@@TeenTeenFpv 🤣🤣🤣🤣 HE'S TRYING HIS BEST!

[@holdmybeer3931]

Is there a corruption and fizzle factor in the settings lol

[@stevenvandenbosch5528]

There would be short an medium range systems spread out in the area between the site and the coast.

[@vertigoalopolus]

That isnt really true. Those systems cost a lot, and need to be used to defend specific potential targets.

[@stevenvandenbosch5528]

@@vertigoalopolus did you have a look at the map? there"s 2 airfileds between the border and the S-400 locqtion, nevermind other army barracks.

[@forMacguyver]

So close !

[@raymondyee2008]

“Top Gun Maverick” vibes here.

[@mikeck4609]

Maybe try again but with the Tomahawks coming from different directions? Truthfully, we would use low observable munitions like the JASM-ER for this I think. Far less time to engage. But, you use what you got. Could have used JSOWs if you had f-35s or EW support to get the f-18s close. Can the F-35 mod carry JSOW?

[@schweizerluchs7146]

JASSM-ER yup

[@grimreapers]

We did test with JSOWs from hornets a few weeks ago, but S300-400 shoots them down.

[@mikeck4609]

@@grimreapers I’ll check it out. Did you guys use the TALDS like this time? May just not be possible without coordinated EW

[@kgp1958]

You forgot the VLS sub....at least 12 more thawks.

[@ey6008]

Can missiles be built inside missiles just as cluster bombs so they can swamp the areas defence

[@seanpreston3653]

After first missiles. Good 2nd plan Capt there getting hit I think

[@trevortaylor5501]

The more dangerous system is the 350, it's brand new though. Looks completely different. Fills a gap in defense.

[@Anarchy_420]

Lmao you guys should have taken The F-18's in at the same time as everything else would've had better chance🙃😆

[@vertigoalopolus]

They were hoping to deplete the SAM ammo, which didnt happen, so that wouldnt have helped.

[@Anarchy_420]

@@vertigoalopolus lol how can you say it wouldn't help? If they would have went in at the same time as the Tomahawks and decoys they would've stood a MUCH better chance running in the way they did at the end instead of waiting for everything to be destroyed freeing up the radar's to focus solely on them a radar that can only target so many incoming ordinance/bogies. So yeah it would absolutely have helped to go in low with The Hornet's while the S-400 & or Pantsir IADS are tied up defending themselves from decoys and Tomahawks😆✌

[@vertigoalopolus]

@@Anarchy_420 The point was to decoy away from the Tomahawks, not have them engaged. If they are targeted, the mission is over. Yes, with the real F18's targetable also, there would have been an improved chance. But it wouldnt be much.

[@Anarchy_420]

@@vertigoalopolus I understand what your saying how that may defeat the purpose of what they were trying to accomplish or w.e, my argument was simply it would have been better for their health to have gone in undercover from everything else instead of waiting until it was all gone and then runnin in with no cover so to speak again I understand why they waited bc they were waiting for the results lol

[@Anarchy_420]

@@vertigoalopolus Thank you! Lol we can agree it would have helped, just have to agree to disagree about how much it would have benefited them... They did make it kinda close ;)

Is their anyway to simulate the podded 60 Kw laser LANCE?

[@grimreapers]

No but I wish there was...

[@pogo1140]

Problem is that DCS does not model offensive ecm. Something that would be in full use.

[@mikeck4609]

Ugh. I should have read your post before I wrote it all over again

[@hippoace]

Does it model defensive ECM?

[@92HazelMocha]

@@hippoace Nope. No ECCM in dcs at all.

[@lohrtom]

TALDs are vastly underused in DCS

[@Darthybuddy]

They were only just around a week ago for the hornets. Idk if the f-14 had them before this.

[@92HazelMocha]

@@Darthybuddy F14 has had them but they don't work great (or at least they didn't the last time I used them) only some air defenses actually interact with it and ai aircraft ignore them entirely.

[@lohrtom]

@@Darthybuddy thanks. Hope to see them used more often

[@willielinks3865]

There's a channel called HypOps that shows how the US would attack a S400 site with just a basic CSG. It's a great video if you wanna check it out

[@KortanaDCS]

That was a fantastic video. I honestly think we are going to have to create something of that scale to actually overwhelm the defenses.

[@willielinks3865]

@@KortanaDCS yeah it's fun watching y'all come up with different ways to defeat it within the limits of DCS. Only so much you can do you know. Either way it'll lose a lot of money and munitions to destroy the site

[@mixit2413]

is there artillery in game try and get some mrls systems in close.

[@grimreapers]

Yes we do have MLRS.

[@mixit2413]

@@grimreapers then surely long range MRLS batteries or artillery would be best used to eliminate these site. In fact I believe that is what Ukraine did for snake island

[@ericjustice5742]

What kind of TOT attack? Is it a STOT or a ITOT?

[@grimreapers]

no idea

[@ey6008]

A type of ray-gun to “fry” the command electronics from within?

[@ey6008]

Need as way to load ray guns onto drones, or onto a literal “swarm”

[@zainredding3476]

Are you going to live stream the meet up?

[@grimreapers]

Neg but will make a vid.

[@M3PH11]

31:38 Maybe if it's 56AD and the romans are still building the roads.

[@mikesmith-wk7vy]

i think there are still quite a few legacy f18s left

[@sirnodrick222]

So, GR Meet up at RIAT. Saturday 16th July, at 10am. Where is the meeting point? RAF Fairford is a huge place.

[@imyourdad2458]

In real life scenario,they can only shoot down slow moving UAVs (like bayraktars). They couldn't defend their ship moskhva,snake island or the recent arms depot at Kherson struck by HIMARS.

[@mattboggs6304]

Errrbody Maverick until the S-400s start flying.

[@RuralSurvivalLLC]

Possible method to defeat S400: 1980s/1990s SLBM targeting all 10 warheads to drop at 45 mile increments in a straight line to the S400s beginning at 400 miles out.

[@Stoney3K]

Obviously you could also Minuteman it from the Nevada desert. But did they even make ballistic missiles with conventional payloads? Because if they did those would really be a viable option.

[@SukhoyBoy4113]

Imagine S500, and the s600 is in RnD

[@patwoodare84]

Can the s400 intercept the himars?

[@Stoney3K]

Swedish pots of gold? You have to put those together yourself?

[@ChaplainDaveSparks]

I'm sure there's a flaw in my logic somewhere, but if AWACS can guide missiles to their target, why not arm AWACS with some missiles of its own? Is it a weight limitation?

[@cockatoo010]

Maybe throw some F35Cs into the mix? Now that they are starting to make their way into VFAs

[@andrewsmall6834]

What about the US AGM-158 JASSM against the S 400? It's a super stealthy long range cruise missile and the results would be interesting especially with multiple launched.

[@Stinger522]

I don't think JASSM is in the game. Eagle Dynamics needs to get it in the game because beyond the F-22, F-35, and hypersonics, there isn't much else in the game that stands a chance against it.

[@92HazelMocha]

@@Stinger522 That's not true, the F15E. Hopefully it'll be out in the next few months and each one can carry 20 gbu39 glide bombs. That means 10 gr dudes can launch 200 glide bombs simultaneously which will 100% overwhelm this site.

[@MICLakVER]

S-400 HAS HYPERSONIC MISSILE TO KILL THEM

[@Stoney3K]

Probably because the specs are classified and any attempt to simulate it would just be an educated guess bordering on fiction?

[@92HazelMocha]

@@Stoney3K especially true with anything "stealth" all we can really do is make complete guesses.

[@mot13ymotley55]

Can't u taxi down the b roads to the target .they won't be expecting that

[@kenhelmers2603]

Since the Tald impersonates the launch vehicle, does that mean it will imitate the F-35C?

[@grimreapers]

hmmm invisible decoy?

[@kenhelmers2603]

@@grimreapers Would be interesting to see, or NOT see LOL

[@Darthybuddy]

I’m sure it can be programmed for whatever you want it to be irl. So an f-35 firing off decoys could realistically impersonate a whole bomber fleet with little trouble.

[@mikeck4609]

Would an actualS-400 system have over 100 missles to be able to take down the 72 TALDS, f-18s and Tomahawks ? I don’t know much about it

[@ey6008]

Everything has to have an answer

[@bluesfool1]

Y’all needed some EF-111’s …..maybe??

[@Tomcat5837]

The USMC are still using legacy hornets.

[@ThatSpyOutside]

It’s the real joint stick for the F-16

[@FalcoGer]

Can a ground force strike defeat the s400 net? Just blow it up with indirect fire weapons

[@ey6008]

Think outside the box is the obvious answer, a long range electronic jammer?

[@Echo4Sierra4160]

An EA-18 Growler would help

[@shauryasingh8447]

How about a Us combined arms assault on S400 , usaf , army with himars and naval attack from sea?????

[@tiadiad]

That should read: Not so topgun. 5:20 This guy drinks: 7:07

[@mikesmith-wk7vy]

i think Harms would help to have

[@lucaskulmann]

i wonder how an sr-71 would do over an sa-400 iads

[@schweizerluchs7146]

boom... Its not a viable option nowadays

[@grimreapers]

Tried it here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l3TWk6KFfJWEi5Y

[@seanpreston3653]

And my text is real time watching

[@trottheblackdog]

Ich bin ein valued viewer!

[@grimreapers]

Nice

[@ey6008]

There has to be as simple answer to this?

[@GageEakins]

Yeah without ECM it is hard to get the simulation to actually work properly, but you could have close by having some F-35 near by with harms to take out the radars when the sites stared getting busy with the decoys. You have already proven they can get nice and close without being fired upon so they would be the ones to take the kill shot.

[@MICLakVER]

HARM is not a problem for them tor pantsir will shoot down any kind of anti radar missile

[@GageEakins]

@@MICLakVER as they have proved in other simulations, stealth aircraft are capable of getting close enough to where anti-missile defenses do not work.

[@MICLakVER]

@@GageEakins s-400 proved to deal with where STEALTH things comes up

[@MICLakVER]

@@GageEakins in real life f22 detected by su 35 in syria and s 400 monitor its radar signature

[@GageEakins]

@@MICLakVER source?