Id like to see belivers scientists vs atheist scientists.
@hamburger96773 жыл бұрын
wouldn’t be that interesting imo
@stephanierivera71433 жыл бұрын
I WOULD LOVE THIS
@ayeshaahsan79313 жыл бұрын
Not as bad. Believer scientists do not claim religion is a fact based science.
@krizhiel63763 жыл бұрын
THIS
@SB-no9pz2 жыл бұрын
I SECOND THIS
@HaUynH243 жыл бұрын
Crystal healers and geologist, that’ll be interesting lol
@tasneemahmed58213 жыл бұрын
That would be freaking embarrassing. Imagine believing a freaking ROCK can do anything let alone work the cosmic powers in your favor. I don’t understand human beings I swear
@joccie71133 жыл бұрын
@@tasneemahmed5821 embarrassing but nothing could ever beat flat earthers vs scientist
@stinkygremlin2673 жыл бұрын
@@tasneemahmed5821 I think rocks can heal you if you believe in it bacuse it's a placebo
@xadielplasencia36743 жыл бұрын
I think they would also need a doctor
@MrWongerz3 жыл бұрын
That’s a great suggestion!
@ezicanshred2 жыл бұрын
This is like an actual proffesional blacksmith talking to a guy who crafted 10,000 axes in minecraft
@flurifiction2 жыл бұрын
As a Minecraft player I feel offended
@scottbecker43672 жыл бұрын
Psh. Amateurs. Talk to me when you've crafted 1000 iron daggers in Skyrim.
@steevinsuhgahl11612 жыл бұрын
Hit the nail on the head.
@jovankuzmanovski53242 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this laugh, I needed it.
@smolcatastrophe29062 жыл бұрын
ahahhahahahahhahh
@arbabashraf11264 ай бұрын
As a Physics Graduate, when he says 'energy' it itches my brain in ways I cannot explain.
@Siegfried58462 ай бұрын
Say that again after you try 🍄
@ahsnsb2 ай бұрын
Physics grad here. The casual use of energy/quantum other scientific terms by these uneducated people is so infuriating
@timothybrown84242 ай бұрын
It’s a buzz word now.
@ShubhamThakur-lq3uc2 ай бұрын
I cannot agree more.
@dn456782 ай бұрын
That’s the difference between spiritual and scientific people. I understand what he means by energy 💀
@Lightnin25113 жыл бұрын
best part astronomer: well im not a evolutionary biologist so i wouldnt know astrologist:well im a cancer rising so i feel the moon and i know this is comedic gold
@hectorcastro49563 жыл бұрын
The guy really knew what his limitations on the topic were and then that girl went on to say that lmao
@nafi_q3 жыл бұрын
Fr
@dimitrifranck3 жыл бұрын
The more I watched the video and listened to the astrologists, the more I realized that they have a lot in common with religion as a whole. Religion is not based on facts and cannot be proven but wants to pass as the ultimate truth. Personal experience plays a huge role in the foundation of people’s religiosity. Instead of energy, religion appeals to faith in order to supposedly prove its trustworthiness and reliability.
@HoneyFromTheHive3 жыл бұрын
Very funny. Though also she is very wrong, 28 days is the average cycle but the cycle length varies from woman to woman. So I guess being cancer rising didn't help her know there!
@tripleschaeyeon3 жыл бұрын
she immediately reminded me of that meme "Omg I crashed a car! I'm such a libra"
@olajong23153 жыл бұрын
These guys said "energy" more times than I did today and I'm taking chemistry and physics.
@Mariane.w3 жыл бұрын
LMAOO
@rocketman37703 жыл бұрын
i just 'feel' that energy surging through me
@AleXander-eo3iz3 жыл бұрын
Astrologist: "If you take all the energies of the sun you'll get enough energies to create more energies inside people. Unless the energies conflict with your shakkra energies then you'll just be left with two energies" Another Astrologist: "YASSS"
@olajong23153 жыл бұрын
@@AleXander-eo3iz I feel the energies
@shlomojaffe11733 жыл бұрын
@@AleXander-eo3iz The energy in this statement really allowed my energy to feel your energy
@unicornbiomes3 жыл бұрын
“It’s a science because I use math” …honey I use math in dungeons and dragons that doesn’t make it a scientific pursuit
@floatytrouty3 жыл бұрын
I used math to calculate resources in Minecraft too,math is merely a tool to describe basically the language of reality,we use these tool to describe a lot of stuff including science
@gypsyhannie3 жыл бұрын
BAHAHAHAHA amazing comment
@jasonz313 жыл бұрын
Yeah umm i think he was the most radical one
@vespeyre3 жыл бұрын
AMAZING!
@reasondro3 жыл бұрын
yup basically
@TheSixerFixer5 ай бұрын
"Because it's been practiced for so long it's a science." Well gee I guess that makes witch-hunting a science.
@Idkchangethislater2 ай бұрын
Science of Fellatio rise up 🔝 🗣️
@myoptimumpride51782 ай бұрын
Religion must be science then
@Loctorak29 күн бұрын
I'm a graduate of pooping studies. PhD, in fact.
@artisanaltoast90853 жыл бұрын
I liked hearing the astronomer talk about how the moon affects his mood by being so beautiful
@kstar14893 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the idea that scientists are these cold calculating inhuman robots is an insane assumption a lot of people have. Scientifically minded people can be just as connected to and emotionally impacted by the universe and it’s beauty as anyone.
@justahugenerd12783 жыл бұрын
It's so cute, I love hearing scientists talk about the beauty in the things they study, idk why that specifically but it brings joy to my heart
@ianlauerastro3 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much, I truly love the stars and the beauty of the cosmos!
@kit1063 жыл бұрын
It really does. Taking my astronomy course has made me look at life different. It’s such a beautiful feeling to know you are apart of such an amazing universe.
@DeepVoiceBryan3 жыл бұрын
Food does that for me. Lol
@haleyandre2 жыл бұрын
"astrology is a science" and then "i interpret the astrology to fit my desired result" that is literally the antithesis of science..
@Galiant20102 жыл бұрын
Imagine if people did that with physics. Like gravity. "What does this ball want? If I throw it up it comes back down, therefore it wants to be with me. If I just let go of it then it falls to the ground, so it must want to get away from me. If I throw it, it won't come back because it thinks I don't want it." Astrology and flat earthers make me so frustrated because they ignore logic and data and make up a narrative to fit their own views. And that's gotta be the worst way to live. You're life is basically a lie at that point, and you're too thick headed to even realize it.
@JoeBrandAG2 жыл бұрын
So, astrology is NOT a science that's why arrogant people call it "pseudo-science" but then again, it's also true that it's NOT NOT-A-SCIENCE because, to be a "pseudo"-science it should be partially true/functional... So, Astrology is not a science because it involves the individual's interpretation of abstract factors that can't be pinned down to the point you can replicate it 100% of the times"... which is exactly the case with Psychology... "Oh, but we can see the chemical reactions on the brain!" Yes, and we can also measure the gravity of ALL planets on earth, but we can't prove their correlation with astrology's claims (because science just doesn't want to give astrology a chance, I mean its so easy to prove it's wrong but they don't because that's how science works when there's a new hypothesis that clearly shows some results) just like how psychologists can't prove which chemical reactions correlate to which trauma/stimulus/etc... so they're both pseudo-sciences.
@confidential3032 жыл бұрын
haley you totally missed the boat on this.
@RONOVLOGZ2 жыл бұрын
@@JoeBrandAG astrology isn’t backed by empirical data, thus the claim that astrology being a science cannot be true. The claim that it can’t not be science is a redundancy to attempt to create a counter argument that is faulty at its root.
@benellis2732 жыл бұрын
@@thelittleowl8399 go off king
@GabrielRaskind2 жыл бұрын
“I’m not an evolutionary biologist so idk” “I’m a cancer rising so I feel the moon” Yep that pretty much sums it up
@user-jq2wg6vk4p2 жыл бұрын
I believe in astrology, but she made us look insane 😬
@alasdairscott47182 жыл бұрын
@@user-jq2wg6vk4p you are insane
@user-jq2wg6vk4p2 жыл бұрын
@@alasdairscott4718 I’m not insane for having beliefs. Just until the past decade, we didn’t know everything was energy, and we still don’t know what dark energy is. There is still so much about the universe that we don’t know for us to be pompous enough to think we have all of the answers. I don’t believe in mainstream astrology. I believe in constellational astrology. I believe in patterns in the universe. If that makes me insane, then so be it, but at least I’m not being told by others what to believe.
@animealpha47952 жыл бұрын
@@user-jq2wg6vk4p past decade ? Dude you need to get back to science asap ! Ever heard of e=mc² ? Yeah that's basically a conversion equation of converting mass into energy. That's year 1905 when we literally devised a equation to calculate how much energy we have in our universe. And yeah, you had to know that the entire universe is made of energy if you wanna start working on discovering an equation about it.
@koig83932 жыл бұрын
@@user-jq2wg6vk4p we are closer to having a perfect model to explain everything in the universe thanks to the advancement of the quantum theories, so if u want answers you can sit and wait cuz they'll keep coming
@willdouglas98969 ай бұрын
I respect these scientists for being able to stay so calm with these takes, as a physics student I wouldn't be able to stop myself laughing tbh
@altaccount97169 ай бұрын
Im surprised the astronomers said something wrong. 13:50. So the thing about that is that it is because of the speed of light, and it took that long for the light to reach you. But it's not only the speed of light. it's the maximum speed of the universe. For example, if the Sun disappeared, we wouldn't know for around eight minutes. That's because that's how long the light would take to reach us. But it's not only the light. it's everything that affects us from the sun, like the gravitational pull. The gravitational pull wouldn't be noticed instantly ethier it would be noticed when we saw the light. That's because everything's maximum speed is the speed of light. So if this beetlejuice plant/star, i don't know what it is, disappeared, we wouldn't feel the effects of its disappearance until we saw the light. Sorry if the English is bad, im only 15, and im not from an English speaking country. Also, source: i learned this from watching a video from Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
@BullShitThat9 ай бұрын
@@altaccount9716 I believe you missed her point entirely, she's saying because it takes photons, gravity, cosmic rays, etc. *time* to propagate through space to reach us here on Earth; then how is it possible that Astrologers are using such celestial objects to make present-day claims about humanity, WHEN those same objects no loner currently exist in this present-day to be interpreted at all. But there is a rebuttal/counterargument to this that could have been made by the Astrologers, but they're not versed enough in science to make this logical counterpoint
@ND72268 ай бұрын
Bro astrology and physics don't have much in common. You are not more qualified to judge than any normie
@SaintIC8 ай бұрын
@@ND7226bad take
@tiinan3758 ай бұрын
@@ND7226they have very much in common what are you taking about
@Cyrotech3 жыл бұрын
I didn’t know people thought astrology was a science
@nick-vv1lz3 жыл бұрын
Yep there's the people who think it's interesting but don't take it serious there's the people who like it in a spiritual sense but know it isn't science and then there's the people who take it way to seriously and ask you your sign before your name and tell you stuff like "oh your a virgo well I'm a gemini and we're just not going to get along together"
@nashi._.75633 жыл бұрын
@@nick-vv1lz Yep, I like it in a spiritual sense. Not in a militant sense. I would never disregard someone based on their sign. That’s silly lol
@cariocaemfuria39463 жыл бұрын
This is why we have the term pseudoscience.
@wwxx233 жыл бұрын
Exactly i thought we were doing it for fun 💀
@rosealexander90073 жыл бұрын
@@nick-vv1lz yup I’m one of those that think it’s interesting but definitely don’t take it seriously lol 😆
@Patterrz3 жыл бұрын
Listening to the Astrologists talk, you can't convince me they're not just making it up as they go
@hamburger96773 жыл бұрын
Alr bro
@electronicbamboo67643 жыл бұрын
Ok
@cartersmith98423 жыл бұрын
Isn't that how talking works...?
@lukassferracin083 жыл бұрын
@@cartersmith9842 you make things up in conversation? thats just lying
@astralfluxaf3 жыл бұрын
You can’t understand things you know nothing about…
@r.b.50502 жыл бұрын
„Psychology is not rooted in a scientific method but in a person‘s energy“ cries in statistics
@in-self-sabotage-mode2 жыл бұрын
Legit lmao I would not want her for a psych consult😂😂😂
@bupekabamba60172 жыл бұрын
I came to the comments section to group cringe at that statement.
@jazminreyes23262 жыл бұрын
Cries in psychological statistical methods in psychology and experimental psychology
@chocofrogs11152 жыл бұрын
Statistics yup, statistics yup yup
@gergelyvirag5332 жыл бұрын
Imagine the reaction on your final exam from the opposer when you say "My thesis is rooted in my personal energy so i thought, no need to use ANOVA". :D
@Mason-lr5dz8 ай бұрын
One thing that stood out to me is how often the astronomers asked questions about what the astrologists believe, compared to how often the astrologists asked.
@dwighteldrichmanaol89224 ай бұрын
That's cuz they have to "defend" astrology whereas astronomy is set in stone.
@tomotrono2424 ай бұрын
what ive gathered and i might be wrong is that astrology is a religion
@a-jjjjjjj3 ай бұрын
Why would they ask questions about what the astronomers believe? Astronomy is widely accepted so they don't really need to defend their beliefs, nor would the astrologists be confused about what they think.
@dasani.like.the.water.2 ай бұрын
@@tomotrono242Pretty much. It’s a belief system with no scientific evidence to back it up. So yeah, exactly like a religion.
@mindhackz2 ай бұрын
@@dwighteldrichmanaol8922If by set in stone you mean observable, ok.
@tomliao30733 жыл бұрын
Time and time again, Jubilee keep showing us that the most clueless people are always the most confident.
@sisi54443 жыл бұрын
yep.... Dunning-Kruger effect
@hawkmaza55512 жыл бұрын
Facts
@jeidelgado30232 жыл бұрын
Factss
@christinagaller43742 жыл бұрын
Jw who are u referring to here?
@-manillazilla83272 жыл бұрын
@@christinagaller4374 obviously the people that believe in astrology
@lostrainforests82593 жыл бұрын
That astronomer stepping forward when asked if celestial objects influence people’s moods and going on and on about pretty planets literally made my day
@Pivotification3 жыл бұрын
My problem is though, that they could be right. I don’t see why planets being far away means they can’t influence us, they do, we can see them and thus experience them. But I just don’t see ANY evidence to what astrologers say. I could copy their ideas and make up my own and then defend them with new ideas like they
@kstar14893 жыл бұрын
@@Pivotification except your think off intuition instead of evidence. Just because we can see the light from a star (one that possibly no longer even exists) doesn’t mean they have an actual physical effect on us other than looking pretty and effecting us emotionally in that way. We know the gravity from far off celestial bodies doesn’t effect us in any significant way objectively.
@_sam_marquez3 жыл бұрын
@Are You Going To Do The 'Ora Ora' Thing? A peer reviewed study recently came out about how our moon affects us physically depending on whether it’s a full moon or a new moon. If the moon is one of the reasons we have tides & affects us physically in terms of our sleep cycle (which can then affect mood) who knows what is possible when it comes to celestial bodies having a influence over us.
@leulgetachew6963 жыл бұрын
@@_sam_marquez causation =/= correlation.
@thastayapongsak44223 жыл бұрын
@@_sam_marquez That's just a cultural effect. Full half and new moon means different things in each culture and to each people. It doesn't prove anything.
@lila66213 жыл бұрын
they should've made the astrologers guess the astronomers' risings, that would have been fun
@yousifa73542 жыл бұрын
Well the lady said you can’t know someone that well after first meeting them to make a prediction, so they’d probably just say that if they get the signs wrong.
@shuzennn2 жыл бұрын
I was thinking that :)))
@altheuss2 жыл бұрын
so to get rising signs we need the exact birth time down to hours and minutes, place and date of birth, not everyone has their birth time with them (usually can be found in birth certificate though). just to clarify :3
@christinagaller43742 жыл бұрын
Great idea. At least they can prove something. If it’s science, there should be reliability.
@pass_da_knoccs832 жыл бұрын
LMAOOO 😂😂😂 Precisely
@Spacedoubt73 ай бұрын
I’m a high schooler taking a college astronomy class. There’s this girl who thought it was an astrology class and she was excited to learn how all the signs work and how the constellations connect our “energies”… I was about to throw a chair…
@eladmint2 ай бұрын
LOL😂
@PonityponАй бұрын
😂😂😂
@Joshua-dc1bsАй бұрын
😏
@Ethan-vo7po3 жыл бұрын
I just came home from a physics exam and the number of times this guy said energy made me cry.
@orchidtea123 жыл бұрын
I’m actually wheezing right now
@eldritch_moth31913 жыл бұрын
You keep using that word… I don’t think it means what you think it means
@gooberthorpos81953 жыл бұрын
ikr... They constantly use the word in a non-scientific way
@karatefutzi3 жыл бұрын
Well Sir i got a fact for you then ! nothing MATTERS unless its ENERGY huehuehuheue
@OmniMale3 жыл бұрын
My mom says that crap. I wanna carve out my eardrums with spoons. Ughh.
@peaceblossom83 жыл бұрын
Nina lost me the minute she said you could use astrology "to validate and affirm the things that you feel in yourself". That is pretty much the definition of confirmation bias; and if you've got confirmation bias going on, your science is at the very least heavily flawed and likely not really science at all.
@shuruktigarajeswaran98523 жыл бұрын
Exactly. When they say they’re just showing possibilities. They just pick and choose things until it perfectly encapsulates the person. There are so many components to astrology that you can just take out and add things until they fit
@alukardio69913 жыл бұрын
@@shuruktigarajeswaran9852 yep, and they make the VAGUEST interpretations so that whoever is reading that feels like it's describing themself. For example: most aquarius moon don't like to fit in a box, they thrive in wild conditions. Like that's at least 60% of people on earth. Mockery
@peterf083 жыл бұрын
She is literally just a con artist
@calvinkay17473 жыл бұрын
Lmaoooooooooooo
@iicloudydrxxmsii28783 жыл бұрын
She was so judgemental and seemed like she wasn't hearing out the otherside.
@squidwardtesticles11913 жыл бұрын
I think astrology should be kept as a spiritual belief, not compare it to science
@squidwardtesticles11913 жыл бұрын
@Extended Long I practice the metaphysical & in my opinion it’s a belief not science I wouldn’t even bring it up into science Bc ik it would just be debunked as not scientifically accurate or possible
@squidwardtesticles11913 жыл бұрын
@Extended Long okay, and it was evaluated in this video lol therefore it’ll be a spiritual belief
@UrbanDecayLova2472 жыл бұрын
Most people I know don’t even see it as a science they just like it for fun, yet people still get so angry about it 😂 I think people who hate astrology need lives personally.
@UrbanDecayLova2472 жыл бұрын
@whatupbrahs and most people I know just view it as fun…so again people who hate astrology so much need lives 😂
@queennatifah_2 жыл бұрын
@@UrbanDecayLova247 truth
@miguelabreucoelho3 ай бұрын
"What makes you say that?" "Physics" "Sure, but we have anecdotal evidence..." .........
@rocketrakkor94243 жыл бұрын
“Psychology isn’t a science” Psychologists: 👁👄👁
@parthavinautiyal3 жыл бұрын
@Alexa Brock and some people’s ignorance would change it?
@gabyboutros15103 жыл бұрын
@Alexa Brock I mean people do not define what science is and what is not lol, as these astrologers are doing. For something to be considered as a science it needs a lot of scrutinization and steps, etc.
@Rationality4Life3 жыл бұрын
Psychology is a science though. Human behaviour is understood by conducting many experiments often involving the manipulation of variables. Mathematical tests are done to test the significance of the results and quantitative data is also often collected and used for analysis and comparison.
@ricochetsixtyten3 жыл бұрын
definition: the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. yes, its a science, albeit a soft science with more variables and more chaotic, if you can study animals and call it science then you can study humans and call it science, were also animals and we behave in complex ways
@moomoothecow30913 жыл бұрын
Its more of a soft science. A subcategory of biology. But psychological data is sometimes quite hard to reproduce because people's minds are so unique.
@Jisungs.moving.castle3 жыл бұрын
“I’m a cancer rising so I feel the moon.” That made me giggle tbh.
@jennyoyster50543 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@giodalle3 жыл бұрын
In astrology, the Ascendant is what zodiac sign was RISING over the horizon, to the east, you can take a glance at the sky to appreciate this. Use an app or something. Anyways, the rising or ascendant is what was first marked upon your being to take the role of, when you came out of the womb. It's how "you" or how others may perceive you, and physically; by first impression mostly. Your looks. Cancer is tied to being ruled by the moon, so... she feels connected to it. As she could, a Cancer rising.
@Ghanemq83 жыл бұрын
@@giodalle who asked? 😊
@giodalle3 жыл бұрын
@@Ghanemq8 wow, great question dude.
@Blaatann533 жыл бұрын
@@giodalle ...so who asked?
@jasminewilliams89442 жыл бұрын
“Psychology isn’t based on the scientific method” I want to SCREAM
@brendad.62042 жыл бұрын
Not all parts of psychology is
@jasminewilliams89442 жыл бұрын
@@brendad.6204 yes, all parts of MODERN psychology are. If you’re referring to the ancient theories of Jung and Freud, those aren’t respected anymore BECAUSE they’re not empirically sound.
@josealbertocardenasyalan67022 жыл бұрын
Psychology is not a science in a strict way.
@jasminewilliams89442 жыл бұрын
@@josealbertocardenasyalan6702 according to who exactly??? I have a bachelor of science in psychology and I work as a research assistant in two psychology labs. From where I stand, it’s absolutely a science in a “strict” sense
@josealbertocardenasyalan67022 жыл бұрын
@@jasminewilliams8944 you are right, my bad. I just search information about the psychology status. I'm kinda old and english is not my native language. :(
@Void-Realm8 ай бұрын
I hate the overuse and incorrect usage of the word energy in stuff like astrology and pseudoscience.
@Ryan-gx4ce8 ай бұрын
My first thought exactly
@Vinny007544 ай бұрын
Kidding, they are nuts.
@a-jjjjjjj3 ай бұрын
"Energy" is allowed to have multiple meanings in different contexts. It annoys me when people use it excessively and vaguely but they clearly aren't trying to talk about the concept of energy in physics
@juliasweeney12303 ай бұрын
Dont forget quantum and resonates also
@hc70923 жыл бұрын
Can’t believe Jubilee still haven’t done Africans v African Americans 😭
@robertking46453 жыл бұрын
I assume it sort of not easy to find real Africans and get them to participate in your videos.
@noemiepalan72473 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@bobaGogo3 жыл бұрын
@@robertking4645 Africa is a big continent, shouldn't be that difficult to find someone in Africa who would be interested in participating
@mrsxber19163 жыл бұрын
@@robertking4645 agreed especially in the US lol. Legit theyd have to go search for Africans who just moved to the US
@Aasmaa073 жыл бұрын
They could do 1st generation Africans or international students/workers. I am sure there are some in California
@SupremeVerdict3 жыл бұрын
"I'm never wrong. I don't miss" *5 seconds later* "Well that's when the interpretation comes into play if they say it's not true" So you just wiggle things about until it's so vague that anything can fit and then you take a mallet to it until it does?
@synlion3 жыл бұрын
Yep. They even said it in the beginning. Astrology is just about finding personality models that resonate with you, i.e. give you the feeling of recognizing some aspect of your personality in them. It makes people believe that they understand themselves because it labels previously unlabeled psychological occurrences for them.
@SupremeVerdict3 жыл бұрын
@@synlion it's just confirmation bias, the game lol.
@theotherleonaygirl3 жыл бұрын
It’s literally cold reading. That’s what “psychics” do to convince people that they have paranormal abilities.
@SupremeVerdict3 жыл бұрын
@@theotherleonaygirl yup yup
@mr.swedishfish123 жыл бұрын
it's called the barnum effect. their "visions" and conclusions/interpretations are so vague and general that it could apply to just about anyone and people think it's true.
@JP-sf6sg2 жыл бұрын
Ian: I’m not an evolutionary biologist Nina: I’m a cancer rising Idk why this was just so funny to me 😂
@stackenitup872 жыл бұрын
Woooooo 🤣🤣🤣
@williamstallings40852 жыл бұрын
@@stackenitup87 ive watched that clip 20 times lmfaoooo
@PriyankaVerma-yh9cs2 жыл бұрын
I see ian and nina i think vampire diaries 😂
@mohamed_is_him2 жыл бұрын
Just the complete polar opposite
@Mia-ek1jp2 жыл бұрын
Loll
@markherbert47234 ай бұрын
New statement: "I feel comfortable lying to people in order to get their money."
@wolfpuppclips23712 жыл бұрын
"Is astrology a science?" "No" There you go, saved you 22 minutes.
@jamangel2 жыл бұрын
Lolll
@kstishko67712 жыл бұрын
Thanks cap
@micahroohi96872 жыл бұрын
fax
@journeyinspirit2 жыл бұрын
It's more a mythology/legend connected to the symbols. Everyone has their own interpretation tho so I'm not gunna go that rabbit hole lmao
@christopherstein20242 жыл бұрын
@@journeyinspirit So it's fiction.
@newchapterasmr3 жыл бұрын
"I'm a cancer rising so I feel the moon" I can't deal with this
@Numb_3 жыл бұрын
when Nina said that they have anecdotal evidence, I clocked out 12:40 btw. you can't argue or reason with a person that thinks like that and the fact that they still call it a science is just an insult to the scientist community.
@luigi16063 жыл бұрын
my grandma got cancer and i hope she is rising too now that she is not with us anymore...
@Darketac3 жыл бұрын
I couldn’t help but laugh after she said that 😂
@aliquidgaming10683 жыл бұрын
@@luigi1606 lmfao stfu lol I'm dying over here....not of cancer, of laughter. Will rise off the ground at some point
@qqq34943 жыл бұрын
what’s so funny about it?
@neobirb8597 Жыл бұрын
The issue I find with astrology is that it, inherently, can never be "wrong". Every inconsistency is shrugged off as an alternative interpretation.
@ilTHfeaa10 ай бұрын
which is why it’s not a science.
@qingxinn_9 ай бұрын
^^^ this can be applied to religion fr fr
@philipshumway99439 ай бұрын
@@qingxinn_facts!! if it does not have the ability to be falsified then nothing is really being said
@doorlord15219 ай бұрын
@@ilTHfeaa exactly. Science isn't always as fun as astrology for this reason. It's much more about the external world telling you what's real rather than you discovering for yourself what's real. Which is why scientists will work for years to prove their theories and will often end up being wrong because that's just the way it works.
@SRVarma19939 ай бұрын
That is the definition of an unfalsifiable claim. The very basic minimal requirement of a scientific proposition is that it should be falsifiable.
@hajartaoussi55374 ай бұрын
Kudos to the astronomers for staying calm the whole time
@seanrobinson7539 Жыл бұрын
The amount of times he said "energy" without it actually meaning anything was mind numbing
@DougDoNascimento4 ай бұрын
And when he kept saying "people actually sat down and figured this out"
@Rebius4 ай бұрын
It would be interesting to ask them to replace the word energy with something else. Would it be the same word over and over, or would they rather come up with more words that better describe what they mean by energy?
@yashasm7533 ай бұрын
Ya figured it out these frauds play with unclear definitions and barnam statements to fool the gullible like you @@DougDoNascimento
@yaboi7722 жыл бұрын
Astronomer: “Gravitational forces between far away celestial bodies are negligible” Astrology: “How do you know that?” Astronomer: “I’ve studied physics for many years to understand how gravity works” Astrology: “Sure, well we have plenty of anecdotal evidence” Is this girl smoking crack? Like wtf makes you think that’s a valid argument?😂
@user-pe2yx9kt4e2 жыл бұрын
Why couldn’t she explain exactly why? I see her point, but the astronomer sounded silly herself if you want to go down that route.
@samba94502 жыл бұрын
@UCxKCdrCfTJ8tL1KtXv3agZQ because the force of gravity has an equation that is dependent on distance u goddamn star clown
@user-pe2yx9kt4e2 жыл бұрын
@@samba9450 if you’re talking to me, then her stating that she’s studied physics for many years doesn’t really have anything to do with that. And it should still have some effect (otherwise, the law does not apply to all situations, which should be the point within their framework, from my understanding and what they put off/communicate- does it cease to exist when it’s far away? Can we say that if it essentially doesn’t show up in certain instances that it has been disproven?). As was brought up, there does seem to be some sort of correlation between the moon and women’s menstrual cycles. And why focus simply upon gravitational forces? Physicists themselves can’t properly group gravity in with the other 3 fundamental forces. There’s so much they don’t know. I don’t really believe in astrology either btw, though I’m still open to the possibility of at least parts of it being legitimate... Though overall, I still think it’s unholy, or at least- it isn’t my place to judge someone completely off of their zodiac sign or whatever other metric they use- especially when doctors push for c-sections and/or induced births.
@josha13492 жыл бұрын
@@user-pe2yx9kt4e that astronomer seemed to be using logically flawed argumentation anyway. She brought up beetlejuice being 400-600 light years away and how it going supernova wouldn't effect them immediately. She's implying that somehow what the astrologers call "energy" is faster than the speed of light. If she studied physics for as long as she said she had, i would hope she would realize how dangerous that implication is and how it would undermine a lot of physics concepts that our world has been built upon today like relativity
@JimmyHey2 жыл бұрын
@@josha1349 Where did you get the idea that she implied that this "energy" was faster than the speed of light? She used that argument solely to disprove how something very far away in space (a celestial body) literally can not affect you at a certain point in time (like your birth). She used a celestial body going supernova 650 lightyears away as a way to disprove that it can't affect you, since it would've happened a long, long time ago for us. She's saying it can't affect you, quite literally the opposite of what you're claiming she's saying. The astrologers would be claiming that it's travelling faster than the speed of light, since they're the ones claiming that the celestial bodies are affecting them. She's claiming it wouldn't. I feel like you're putting words in her mouth or just simply misunderstood what she said.
@sunnyy7882 жыл бұрын
The girl studying psychology sadly represented psychology in a misleading light. Psychology IS based on the scientific method, we DO have theories that guilds our research and these theories and hypotheses are then restructured if they are not supported by evidence. Yes, it is a soft science, but NO it is not comparable to astrology.
@user-ur2wd8du4z2 жыл бұрын
louder!!!!
@brandonsolanes92172 жыл бұрын
I disagree, I don’t believe it is a soft science whatsoever, that is hard science, as complicated and intricate as physics chemistry or biology, honestly it’s people like this that water down its significance because the real physiologist (unlike the girl in this video, who clearly said that in order to fair over some sort of credibility) have done remarkable work and have conducted and observe crazy experiments that deserve more recognition, not someone that poses as one just to undermine all of the work of great minds that came before
@sunnyy7882 жыл бұрын
@@brandonsolanes9217 Thanks for that! I completely agree with you regarding how you describe the science. When it comes to soft vs. hard science, I guess that depends on the definition you go by, as it is still quite vague, and what aspects you want to focus on. Main point - psychology is a science and I'm glad that other people agree with me on the fact that the girl merely tried to make herself seem more credible.
@cpisarek42842 жыл бұрын
Coming from a scientist in a biological field, I 100% agree that psychology is a science that is based on the scientific method! I think people get hung up on the fact that what was once considered fact may not prove to be true in the future. But that's science for ya. Lol
@cliffinhokisero37472 жыл бұрын
Psychology is a science
@tormartinab4 ай бұрын
I know I'm late, but calling the sun and moon planets at 14:10 is just wild to me
@AstronomyAdmirer3 ай бұрын
And also saying Pluto is a planet also 😂
@iamhere97582 ай бұрын
@@AstronomyAdmirer well, in astrology we describe Pluto as a planet.
@AstronomyAdmirer2 ай бұрын
@@iamhere9758 Pluto is a dwarf planet Not a planet
@iamhere97582 ай бұрын
@@AstronomyAdmirer I can repeat my statement as much as I need to, until you stop for a moment and actually read carefully what I wrote "in ASTROLOGY we describe Pluto as a planet".
@AstronomyAdmirer2 ай бұрын
@@iamhere9758 I don’t care what you describe in astrology It’s a pseudoscience and I have no time for it
@cheesesteakphilly2 жыл бұрын
Astronomers: “I’m mad because I slept in and was late for work.” Astrologers: “I’m mad because Mercury is in retrograde and Mars’ moon is in its 5th phase causing a shift in behavioural actions…but what can I say, I’m an Aquarius lol.”
@E_PHI_r2 жыл бұрын
I don’t think they know mars has moons
@vijaygk-zj6tl Жыл бұрын
🤣
@teaz8974 Жыл бұрын
HHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAH
@sahara_2648 Жыл бұрын
Lmao 😂
@C8H10N4O2-b Жыл бұрын
LMFAOO
@nissi55223 жыл бұрын
I aspire to have the patience of these astronomers. Hearing "energy", "I feel like", "affirming", "resonates with me" while discussing science would have made me lose my cool.
@tiny-grimes3 жыл бұрын
@Sanningen There is no "energy for me or you or them" in scince. Just like people don't say "Well, gravity for me is...". Energy in physics is a quantitative property. And whenever you say "studies show", please provide backup. What studies, where and under what curcustances those studies were performed, how many test subjects therer were (and what are the ages, genders they are), where it was published?. The moon affect the tide because of gravitational pull.
@erin15693 жыл бұрын
@Sanningen if you start with "Energy for me can be" you're already outside the realm of science. You can talk and use the term "energy", but don't pretend to be talking about science. Scientific terms are very precisely determined. Constellations have no effect on our lives except for the light they produce. Regarding the moon claim, it can come down to the amount of light you see, your biological sleep cycles, the placebo effect or many others. You wouldn't even be able to include gravity has because (at best) the moon exerts a force of 0.005 Newtons/kg compared to Earth's 9.8 N/kg, meaning it would get lost in the uncertainty of your potential paper. I don't think we're able to isolate the moon as the primary factor.
@APerson-qw8yy3 жыл бұрын
Both sides were cringey in this episode. Hard to watch.
@jesswinter3 жыл бұрын
Right? When she compared psych and astrology. I would have had to walk out right there lmaooo
@mauricioh44613 жыл бұрын
cry about it
@ovrthemoon53093 жыл бұрын
i almost lost it when that one woman said psychology is not rooted by the scientific method - this is absolutely not true. as someone about to graduate with a bachelor’s in the subject, although the field of psychology does have its issues, what we know CAN be backed by empirical research. we know what therapeutical techniques and medications work to improve symptoms of mental disorders because of randomized/controlled scientific trials.
@meeranair13 жыл бұрын
Yes thank you! As a psych student, I was up in arms when she said that. Don't need the scientific method to prove she had no idea what she was talking about.
@loverrlee3 жыл бұрын
That is true, but it’s called a “soft science” because all the scientific trials are based on testimonials. Isn’t it the same for astrology? We just haven’t done any scientific trials based in astrology yet.
@ovrthemoon53093 жыл бұрын
@@loverrlee i wouldn’t say ALL studies are based on testimonials alone. sure, subjective variables like resilience and well-being are hard to measure or observe directly, so studies on these can often rely on participant self-reports. but studies DO exist using direct observation on behavior as evidence, most often with animal subjects like mice or hamsters (especially with studies pertaining to drug use disorders or the like). i also don’t see how anyone could conduct a true scientific study on astrology, since the whole point is that you’re “born” with certain traits based on star placements at your time of birth - you can’t just randomly assign someone a new time of birth or natal chart to see if they suddenly act any differently.
@ebonyhardiman75193 жыл бұрын
I said that not to be disrespectful. From what I've studied in my masters program, I see psychology as an interpretation of human behavior that is backed by science. Unlike astrology which I see as an interpretation of human behavior that is not back by science. There's levels, I'm not saying psychology and astrology are the same thing or on the same level but I do see overlap and I do consider astrology an soft science.
@ovrthemoon53093 жыл бұрын
@@ebonyhardiman7519 this is an interesting perspective to have - thanks for the clarification! although i (respectfully) disagree on your stance of astrology as a soft science, but with your master’s degree perhaps you have learned something i haven’t yet haha, would be interesting to know how you got into astrology and what led you to considering it a soft science
@user-qw4ud5cj6j4 ай бұрын
“I can only go off of planets in our orbit, the moon, the sun, Pluto…..” literally lists 3 things in a row that are not planets😂
@rafox663 ай бұрын
To be fair, Pluto is still a dwarfplanet
@JimTheEditor2 ай бұрын
I staggered when he kept going.
@kimberleymonroe86252 ай бұрын
@@rafox66Right, but it's not a planet
@rafox662 ай бұрын
@@kimberleymonroe8625 Close enough for an astrologist.
@sanathanadharma1082 ай бұрын
Bro the literal meaning of Planet is Wanderers of the sky. So Sun and moon are technically Planets. But in science they are objects which revolve around a Star.
@CantComeUpWithAGoodName2 жыл бұрын
Ashley is so sharp. She always realises what’s going on when there is a miscommunication and can put it into words spot on. Apart from her obvious expertise of course.
@ianv28752 жыл бұрын
Yeees
@ikebeckman10742 жыл бұрын
@@inthebegninnging5166 bruh that’s sus asf 🤡🤡
@Elias.__2 жыл бұрын
Right
@eaj0082 жыл бұрын
@@ikebeckman1074 Fr💀
@annejia53822 жыл бұрын
true
@adara03 жыл бұрын
No, astrology is not a science
@adara03 жыл бұрын
@@TheGubernatis you can study it, but that doesn't mean astrology is a science in any way, it's been proven it's not a science
@astrida1113 жыл бұрын
Adara Sanchez Rosado if it was proven it’s not a science, it wouldn’t be a question. Don’t say something you don’t know
@percaholic69393 жыл бұрын
@@TheGubernatis just coz u can study and understand something doesn't make it science
@carmen_133 жыл бұрын
@@TheGubernatis Science (from Latin scientia 'knowledge') is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of *testable explanations* and predictions about the universe.
@adara03 жыл бұрын
@@astrida111 it was proven, but astrology stills around because 1. It makes money 2. People find it "interesting" and "mysterious" and 3. Lots of poeple fall for it and don't care that it's not a science, so don't YOU talk about things you don't know
@m.l34833 жыл бұрын
Astronomers: So are you saying that Astrology is more like Psychology? Astrologers: Yes Psychologists: Are we a joke to you?
@elizabethbauer52553 жыл бұрын
Masters in psychology here... that part made me mad pissed off not gonna lie. Psychology is definitely science backed and peer reviewed!
@lovewins10723 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@nodranb983 жыл бұрын
Both psychology and astrology are behavioral based practices. To claim they are the exact same is ridiculous but there is some connections which should be noted. They both track the complexity of human nature and I would agree that psychology is a science more so than astrology by far (professional astrologer here). Many astrologers also collect empirical data throughout their studies so it is on par with sciences but because it is all interpretation and so closely linked to spirituality it becomes invalidated by science.
@bradlytshigeng73503 жыл бұрын
@@elizabethbauer5255 yes, yes it is.
@asassyghostnamedcassie3 жыл бұрын
I suggest we'd change it from psychologists to psychics, that seems more accurate🔮
@EmperorsNewWardrobe4 ай бұрын
This episode was very necessary to show that middle ground can at times be a very bad thing
@a-jjjjjjj3 ай бұрын
This one is weird because the two "sides" are both completely different yet not mutually exclusive. One is a field of science, one is a set of spiritual beliefs. The astrologists aren't even challenging anything about astronomy.
@filippetrovic8452 ай бұрын
@@a-jjjjjjjSpiritual beliefs 😂 But you can only use word “spiritual” from a stance of someone who doesnt know what he is talking about. You probably cant describe what is spiritual yourself.
@buttercat2718Ай бұрын
@@filippetrovic845i mean it’s a belief system isn’t it? That’s the main point the commenter was making abt astrology idk why you’re hung up on the “spiritual” part
@No-cg9kj25 күн бұрын
@@a-jjjjjjj that's because not one of them could pass enough calculus to have anything relevant to say about astronomy lol.
@SheldonEvansx3 жыл бұрын
*I think we can clearly see which of these people KNOW what they’re talking about and which of them do not.* That’s all I’m going to say.
@mclovin68773 жыл бұрын
Well said
@lynnhawkins9523 жыл бұрын
I had to stop at 8:53. It's called "evidence based practice" and if a therapist is using anything else outside of a research capacity they are not clinicians, they are quacks.
@ojustambe19183 жыл бұрын
How convenient even your name is Sheldon!
@TheAgonizingBeauty3 жыл бұрын
@@lynnhawkins952 it's literally in our code of ethics that we must use only interventions and approaches that are grounded in evidence-based practice.
@tracker5693 жыл бұрын
Yep!!
@jialcantara46143 жыл бұрын
"she's so annoying, she's definitely an asparagus"
@MaybeLily12343 жыл бұрын
Are you sure she's not a Capri Sun?
@dandremusic63143 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@lianives35943 жыл бұрын
she must be a tauros pokemon im pretty sure
@TheOrangVegetal3 жыл бұрын
Yall are wrong, dead giveaway she's a Bob Saggetarian
@deneikarose66553 жыл бұрын
@@lianives3594 she definitely not a tourist
@adamhicken88983 жыл бұрын
These astrologists remind me of politicians, they can talk and talk without ever saying anything. They also contradict themselves with their own logic, which is also like modern politicians
@Random-sk6hm3 жыл бұрын
fr
@rocketman37703 жыл бұрын
the astronomers were the sensible moderates, and the astrologists were the alt right and woke left lmao
@taylosaurus3 жыл бұрын
@@rocketman3770 make way for the enlightened centrist, everyone
@rocketman37703 жыл бұрын
@@taylosaurus make way for woke Taylor, her entitled opinion supersedes all common folk lmfao
@taylosaurus3 жыл бұрын
@@rocketman3770 I never specified my stance lol, way to prove me right sir
@Suzuki_bj3 ай бұрын
My favorite part is at the 11:15 mark when the one astrologist tries to explain that since the moon effects the ocean causing tides then it must effect our bodies because we are made of 70% water. You can see how a lack of understanding of science can literally have you make up anything and correlate it. He has no understanding of gravity causing tides and not the moon having some magical effect on water.
@JimboJamble2 ай бұрын
I wish they'd spent a bit longer talking about this. I feel like seeing how the moon affects the tides is validating for people who want to believe that celestial objects can influence people. After all, if the moon can move _the entire ocean,_ how could it _not_ affect us? Even if people understand just how tiny the pull from the moon is, they don't really understand tidal forces and how immeasurably small the difference in strength across the length of our 5-6 foot bodies is. They also don't really consider questions like... if we're influenced by the pull of the moon, could you change or negate the effect just by changing the orientation of your body?
@Nonamelol.12 күн бұрын
Huh? 😂 that is exactly how tides happen though, the moon’s gravity causes tides.
@oneill76511 ай бұрын
This is like watching highschoolers debate their teachers
@milansvancara7 ай бұрын
Or religious people debate biologists
@TheSixerFixer5 ай бұрын
Or humming birds debate Stephen Hawking.
@elitehumpty36034 ай бұрын
@@milansvancara ...many biologists follow religion. I think you mean't EXTREMISTS debate biologists
@Vinny007544 ай бұрын
@@milansvancara I would have no issues with these people if they claimed astrology to be a belief system akin to a religion or ideology. It's when they start claiming "science" and putting the two on equal footing like astrology can point to anything it has done to better mankind outside of giving simpler people something to talk about.
@xenon36334 ай бұрын
@@elitehumpty3603 *Fundamentalists
@blue---monday2 жыл бұрын
Astrology should be considered as religion at this point tbh. It's literally, LITERALLY a belief. It's torally fine if you find it suitable for you, but recognize it as a belief. If abrahamic religious folks can accept the whole world telling them that their scripture ≠ science, then astrologers shouldn't get butthurt to be considered the same thing honestly.
@AstroAnalysis2 жыл бұрын
Strongly agree!
@jasminehernandez49142 жыл бұрын
You can’t be serious 😂
@captainobvious80372 жыл бұрын
Jasmine, i think you need to specify what you are talking about
@juanaabad73152 жыл бұрын
Sooo you do realize it’s based on a both Roman and Egyptian mythology (religion)
@dancingdani252 жыл бұрын
100% agree
@trashpanda22192 жыл бұрын
I was really happy when Ashley brought up correlation vs causation, because it seemed to me that that was one of the largest divides between the groups.
@scrollreader73552 жыл бұрын
Sofia at one point sounded like she was starting to explain confirmation bias too. I don't know if they just kinda cut out some of that or if she actually didn't go all the way with it but I do wish she'd carried that point as far as I think it could have gone in the video because correlation vs causation and confirmation bias are probably the single two biggest perpetrators of pseudoscience.
@superflashyariel38352 жыл бұрын
I was happy about that too. People seem to forget that correlation does NOT equal causation.
@andresreal82618 ай бұрын
"I'm a spiritual analyst". Unemployed, got it.
@Melsmom4 ай бұрын
🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣
@almonteiro31953 ай бұрын
And a criminal.
@oyuyuy Жыл бұрын
You can really see how the astronomers ponder over how ruthless they want to be
@skyguytomas96159 ай бұрын
Ponder? They came in thirsty for blood. 😂
@Tavat9 ай бұрын
@@skyguytomas9615Nah, they were incredibly gentle with these weirdos.
@dragonmaster9098 ай бұрын
@@skyguytomas9615they were considerably nice
@lexivivid80738 ай бұрын
This!!!!!!!!!!
@palubaker1177 ай бұрын
Factssss
@abc64593 жыл бұрын
If I hear "energies" 1 more time I'm gonna scream
@kwesibruno3 жыл бұрын
E...ah, fuck it.
@roberttramone99673 жыл бұрын
@@kwesibruno Challenge everything!
@aspebb3 жыл бұрын
La energia
@terrancesilvermistbenjamin98643 жыл бұрын
Oof that’s some strong energies I feel coming your way. What’s your sign? Lol
@mariana4573 жыл бұрын
Energy 😂👀
@amberv1340 Жыл бұрын
Super intelligent how the astronomer said yes, there is likely a connection between women's menstrual cycles and the moon, but that's a topic for an evolutionary biologist to address. Excellent critical thinking and appropriate professional awareness of one's field.
@staebs Жыл бұрын
“The human menstrual cycle is only the about same length as the lunar month - it isn’t synchronised with a particular phase. One frequently cited study, published in the American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology in 1980, found some evidence of synchronisation, but the effect was very weak. Of the sample of 312 women, 244 had cycles that were longer than 29 days or shorter than 27, and only 70 per cent of the rest actually started their period within two weeks of the full Moon. If locking our reproductive cycle to the lunar month was advantageous, you might expect other animals to do the same. Orangutans and possums have 28-day cycles, but our closest relatives, the chimpanzees, have 35-day cycles. Non-primate mammals have an oestrous cycle, which works differently to menstruation, but none of them synchronise their reproduction with the phases of the Moon.” source: sciencefocus “Studies suggest synchronizations in the lunar and menstrual cycles are down to random chance. It turns out, most evidence suggests that a person’s period links up with lunar cycles only at the rate you’d expect due to random chance. Early studies suggested a tenuous link. However, a 2013 retrospective study in the journal Endocrine Regulations that tracked 74 women over a year found no evidence for the synchronization of lunar phases to the menstrual cycle. The rise of period-tracking apps has enabled researchers to undertake even bigger studies. In 2019, researchers at the tracking app Clue analyzed 7.5 million cycles from 1.5 million app users. (This analysis did not go through peer review, a process whereby outside experts vet new research before it's published.) They found no evidence that menstrual cycles or periods were more likely to happen at any time in the lunar cycle.” source: livescience TLDR: there is no basis in the science, nor evolutionary evidence that the timeframes of menstruation and the lunar cycle happen to be vaguely similar. Humans like to make connections and a lot of the time periods of time in the natural world just happen to be similar due to random chance.
@TH-el1dr Жыл бұрын
@@fallenangel_899i fear you grossly misunderstood what he meant when saying it correlates with the lunar month meaning the amount of time is the same, not that the lunar cycle and menstrual cycle occur at the same time
@erinwhipple466611 ай бұрын
But everyone’s menstrual cycle is different, so how could menstruation be in any way related to an unchanging lunar cycle…?
@fallenangel_89911 ай бұрын
@@TH-el1dr There’s literally nothing to fear lol
@jasonhaven71709 ай бұрын
Evolutionary biology is not a thing.
@dasani.like.the.water.2 ай бұрын
The Barnum Effect: a common psychological phenomenon whereby individuals give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically to them, yet which are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. Without the Barnum Effect, none of these astrologers would have a job
@eladmint2 ай бұрын
Forer*
@marks.52073 жыл бұрын
“So, what’s your degree-I’m sorry, what’s your definition of science?” Freudian slip, much? 😂
@Random-sk6hm3 жыл бұрын
lmao
@bobba19683 жыл бұрын
Timestamp? 🗿✨
@marks.52073 жыл бұрын
@@bobba1968 7:33
@realsmollbean3 жыл бұрын
@@bobba1968 7:33
@realsmollbean3 жыл бұрын
@@marks.5207 Dang how were u 58 seconds before me
@liv4822 жыл бұрын
I feel like a conversation between astrologists and psychologists would have helpful and productive for the discussion. For example, psychologists (or even an evolutionary biologist) would be able to explain all the research that have been done on nature vs nurture, as well as the science behind bias studies such as hindsight bias and people's tendency to find patterns in random events. Psychologists ARE a REAL SCIENCE by the way. Absolutely infuriating that they said otherwise.
@nickgarcia65722 жыл бұрын
YES! I couldn't help but noticing how the astrologers are affected SO much by confirmation bias, hindsight bias, and so on. They really all three need to take some Psych classes. For all they think they understand about human psychology... yeah. They have no clue what it actually is.
@th-ck9vl2 жыл бұрын
My biology teacher warned me away from evolutionary psychology so idk. He said most of it is conjecture?
@katringlass21402 жыл бұрын
psychology is not science, it is just looking at behavior and seeing patterns and using these to heal people‘s minds. the chemical imbalance theory has been debunked long ago, so psychology really hasn‘t anything to do with science, but with observation of behavior. tell me one psychological practice that is scientific and not behavioral and hasn‘t been banned cos it‘s cruel?
@xh567582 жыл бұрын
@@katringlass2140 Lol , all modern psychology is done using a empirical method compatible with scientific method. Chemical imbalance theory was created in the 1950's 😂 .
@voyance4elle2 жыл бұрын
yay for that
@00mpa1oomp44 ай бұрын
This is like a call of duty bro taking on a marine
@destinyluna72163 жыл бұрын
Just needed to clarify that psychology is a science that IS rooted in the scientific method. And ethical therapy modalities are ALL evidence-based. Social sciences use the scientific method as well smh
@saraantonangeli92833 жыл бұрын
And SHE is the one who studied Psychology! 😫
@elizabethbauer52553 жыл бұрын
Yes!!! Thank you!! That made me so mad. Masters in psychology here.
@HackersSun3 жыл бұрын
Yes. And still, not the shrinks I went to didn't treat sh*t The pyschs asked me questions to "treat myself" Healthy gamer gg taught that pyschs don't do crawp
@andrew-qw5ez3 жыл бұрын
they are considered soft sciences because it's near impossible to ethically conduct experiments on people and control for millions of variables but definitely agree that it shouldnt be lumped together with astrology
@fuck_anx3 жыл бұрын
When you make a psychological test it works, when you make an astrology test it works (after 20 attempts) yeah these ppl are delusional
@Acered.2 жыл бұрын
"you know the basic planets: the sun, the moon, including Pluto"... As someone with a degree in Astrophysics, this broke me 🙃
@fluff975 Жыл бұрын
don't know why more people aren't pointing that moment out lol. literally none of those are actual planets
@renarouge5558 Жыл бұрын
I cried🤣🤣🤣
@DES.S.O.O Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 I thought that was weird too. Those are definitely stars, my dear. Pluto hasn’t even been a planet for over a decade.
@jacobrampage7814 Жыл бұрын
@@DES.S.O.Owhat you just said was just as bad. The moon and Pluto are stars now ?
@laras1072 Жыл бұрын
@@jacobrampage7814 Pluto isn't considered a planet anymore because it can't conduct it's own orbit, which planets should be capable of, pretty basic explanation tho
@breshaunbutler89043 жыл бұрын
Hearing someone say that psychology is a “soft science” and not rooted in the science method is bewildering to me being because there is absolutely no way that she knows about psychology if she made that statement. I’m getting my Masters in Clinical Psychology currently and plan to get my PhD. The amount of research and studies that are done to prove what we know is astronomical. Rant over 😅 I just got very triggered because I work my ass of to study certain topics and constantly have professors down my throat if I say/ write a statement that isn’t backed by citations.
@downwiththeclique72393 жыл бұрын
That part on the citations
@coolio48433 жыл бұрын
in my school psychology is in the college of liberal arts (a non science school) and not in the same school as chemistry, biology, physics, medicine. i am not sure why. i am just saying that a lot of people think psychology is up for interpretation because you can go to many different doctors and they not all diagnose you the same way.
@elizabethbauer52553 жыл бұрын
Yes!!!
@gypsyhannie3 жыл бұрын
HERE HERE. I'm a psych student as well and I was totally triggered by that too.
@priscieyango97983 жыл бұрын
Psychology follows the empirical method, so definitely natural sciences. The confusion is that it is a hybrid of art and science. Those who majored in the arts of psychology often do not get exposed to the sciences however those who major in science of psychology get the exposure to both. I think she's the former
@Darnactheduck8 ай бұрын
So it's feelings vs facts debate?
@jupiterfox76838 ай бұрын
@tygonysusThe astrologists can absolutely be wrong if they claim being anything other than a scam
@omnium_gatherum3 жыл бұрын
"I'm not an evolutionary biologist so I don't know-" "Sure sure sure... I'm a cancer riiising..."
@JabranImran3 жыл бұрын
11:48 Its authentic
@omnium_gatherum3 жыл бұрын
@@JabranImran 🤣🤣
@myprettygirl913 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭
@omnium_gatherum3 жыл бұрын
@@myprettygirl91 😂😂 watched that like "here we gooo 🙄"
@maria-xq8yw3 жыл бұрын
this part made me laugh so damn hard
@MN-co2ni3 жыл бұрын
Out of the astrologers, Ebony was the most level-headed. It seemed like she more so understood she is reading people and trying to be therapeutic rather than full-on saying astrology is accurate.
@jdeljones3 жыл бұрын
She also said she was a psychologist, or has a psychology degree. So maybe that's why. She's familiar with working with evidence-backed research and can distinguish between when something being more analytical or interpretive. She definitely had the most interesting perspective out of the astrologers.
@nafi_q3 жыл бұрын
Fr
@josearguettabitoni64482 жыл бұрын
What kinda name is Ebony lol
@chinenyekalu71792 жыл бұрын
@@josearguettabitoni6448 its pretty normal name.. get your mind out of the gutter, not everything needs to be sexualized
@papamama31962 жыл бұрын
Definitely yes .. but she also implied that practicing psychology and therapy is not evidence backed which is a major red flag 🚩🚩
@aliyaissunshine3 жыл бұрын
Ian’s response about being affected by celestial objects is so wholesome and sweet😭
@ianlauerastro3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! This comment has me smiling from ear to ear :)
@shibuya41893 жыл бұрын
@@ianlauerastro you had great takes Ian
@jizanthapus30993 жыл бұрын
@@ianlauerastro i love what you said, and i think you would like this poem by walt whitman! “When I heard the learn’d astronomer, When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me, When I was shown the charts and diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them, When I sitting heard the astronomer where he lectured with much applause in the lecture-room, How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick, Till rising and gliding out I wander’d off by myself, In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time, Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars.”
@yogibear37612 жыл бұрын
@@ianlauerastro nah kidding u were delusionate
@PresidentJeanAuguste2 жыл бұрын
@@yogibear3761 Hold your horses m8, arent you going too far calling him "delusionate"?
@michaelwiltbank36194 ай бұрын
if bro says energy one more time I'm gonna lose it
@jesswinter3 жыл бұрын
That girl did not just compare psych and actual therapy with astrology. Oof. Thank you to the astronomer that corrected her.
@federicamottadelli93333 жыл бұрын
As a Psychology student, I died inside a little bit.
@ebonyhardiman75193 жыл бұрын
There are many people who view therapy in the same way people view astrology. So yes I did. I am a therapy student so using my knowledge of both I stated my own opinion.
@viniciosgomes19453 жыл бұрын
I mean, I think that astrology, in regards to its psychology aspects, can be somewhat helpful to those who practice it. However, everything else that says planets and stars can affect how we should feel or what we should do is plain gibberish, then rendering astrology unnecessary at the end of the day.
@emotional_st0rm3 жыл бұрын
"psychology is a soft science" says literally only people who have never heard an actual psychologist speak .-.
@sleepyaoki3 жыл бұрын
I was really irritated when Ebony categorized psychology and astrology in an equal level. Psychology is far more deeper and important that what people believe in, in astrology
@helenhelmi81293 жыл бұрын
I think that Mars representing aggression and Venus representing love is a matter of Greek mythology, not the universe. The planets in our solar system were named after Roman Gods by us humans, so I believe it’s evident that Mars representing aggression is quite arbitrary, because Mars could have been named Venus. I felt like astronomers supported their claims way better than astrologists did.
@Maydenne3 жыл бұрын
I wish they had chosen a more practically spoken person for one of the astrologers. We don’t all talk as vaguely as they did.
@ebonyhardiman75193 жыл бұрын
We mentioned the mythology and archetypes in the video, unfornately it was edited out. But we definitely talked about that
@ebonyhardiman75193 жыл бұрын
@@Maydenne there were a lot of things edited out of the video because there was a lot that we did explain very practically and you can't tell from the final result which is frustrating
@kadijahmcintosh10553 жыл бұрын
Greeks were the first who studied the stars and stuff and later called it astrology
@synlion3 жыл бұрын
@@ebonyhardiman7519 how did you tie them to astrology?
@jonathanwalsh89523 жыл бұрын
This resembled a compassionate parent trying to understand the ramblings of a young teenager that doesn't know themself.
@atafakheri86592 жыл бұрын
more like a con, saying whatever people like to hear to get paid
@titusrivers50592 жыл бұрын
😂🤣😂🤣😂😂
@Dotexe2452 жыл бұрын
except they were grown ass adults
@muheetkhan49172 ай бұрын
dude thinks that he is effected by the moon cause his body is made out of 70 percent water😂
@stiffstud85112 жыл бұрын
I think astrology is a fun and neat idea and I don't hate on people who are in to that type of stuff, but if you take it as a science, that's a whole different story..
@TomisaLami2 жыл бұрын
It wasn't fun for the millions of people that were murdered due to astrological interpretations.
@jonathan_byers_stan24162 жыл бұрын
@@TomisaLami hold up lmao what
@firstylasty94172 жыл бұрын
Grimm's Fairy tales are fun, but I don't believe in talking cats and gold hay. Blows my line people who can't toe the line.
@dishadhouliyan51902 жыл бұрын
@@TomisaLami True
@cagliari59842 жыл бұрын
@@TomisaLami Danny what? Please elaborate before dropping an astrology lore bombshell.
@domdubz70372 жыл бұрын
“I’m a cancer rising so I feel and know from personal experiences” - definitely a scientist.
@KuldeepDaftary2 жыл бұрын
I think she did agree that she's not a scientist and she doesnt think astrology is a science.
@mohamed_is_him2 жыл бұрын
"Feel" is the key word here
@cherryblush23122 жыл бұрын
I have read this one at 16:00 xd
@belletense36182 жыл бұрын
Psych Student here: psychology is a science and we use the scientific method - and yes we use it for treatment too! If it weren’t based in science it would be unethical to implicate said treatment on ppl. Don’t listen to her, psychology is a field in science, research, and health/medicine
@jeremyd24532 жыл бұрын
Hence the whole idea of evidence-based practice that's gained a lot of momentum nowadays. Maybe she was referring to non-standardised therapies like psychodynamic and stuff where you can't really have the same level of evidence in why they work and all that. But you can still see whether it's helped people and compare it to a placebo and control group, and then you technically still have scientific data... But I do get what she meant, cause like it happens a lot of times where you can just have different results depending on the people that participate in the study. And it's not like all the replicated studies get published so there's a lot of info we wouldn't have...
@ChechoColombia12 жыл бұрын
Im sorry but psych is not a science, replicability fails almost everytime in psych experiments.
@leorkoubi46262 жыл бұрын
I'd like to believe that, but so many foundational studies such as the Stanford prison study a were done with a terrible methodology, and now it's unethical to repeat them so we are basing our understanding off of faulty assumptions.
@soaptastesalrightiguess79322 жыл бұрын
@@leorkoubi4626Oh just wait until you find out what WWII Germany/Japan's 'scientific endeavors' looked like LOL Remember, the accepted model of the solar system used to be geocentrist. Science is what WE can interpret of the natural world. Science is NOT some miracle method of unveiling every possible quality of a subject with absolute objectivity and detail ... There are bound to be thousands upon thousands of 'errors' yet to come in our journey to understand the universe.
@Schemaboy2 жыл бұрын
yesss
@blazin72992 ай бұрын
its criminally insulting to put up meth heads against scientists
@alejandrolobo43313 жыл бұрын
I've been wating for this one since flat earthers and scientists
@AxxLAfriku3 жыл бұрын
GAGAGAGAGAGA!!! I want to cut my toenails... NEVER! I am the feet KZbinr. Thanks for being a fan, dear alej
@Pizza_Rat3 жыл бұрын
@@AxxLAfriku what the hell?
@sayanAcharjee3 жыл бұрын
I couldn't even dared to watch the "flat earthers and scientists", didn't think I could survive the cringe arguments from "one of the sides"
@samthomas72533 жыл бұрын
@@sayanAcharjee omg no, it's seriously entertaining and the scientists absolutely wipe the floor with them
@sayanAcharjee3 жыл бұрын
@@samthomas7253 really? I will then 😅😅
@jonathanhenderson94223 жыл бұрын
Astrologer: "Can I ask what makes you say that with such certainty?" Astronomer: "Because I do physics and I know how the force of gravity works." :D
@ikkajchan3 жыл бұрын
It’s crazy though because the more you learn about gravity, the less we actually know.
@michaelxchi3 жыл бұрын
@@ikkajchan what have you said ?
@dairygecko3 жыл бұрын
@@ikkajchan and still, makes more sense
@m.l34833 жыл бұрын
@@michaelxchi it means the more you study something in-depth, the more you realize there is yet to be known
@boots10973 жыл бұрын
also like.... what if there's something effecting us from the planets that isn't necessarily just gravity?
@cWjkL8ysxOkrH66 Жыл бұрын
I love how every time the astronomers asked where did the association between certain planets and emotions came from the astrologers would simply start listing what planet is associated with each emotion.
@ctogive9 ай бұрын
Or how that guy said astrology has to be a science because they use math and charts
@altaccount97169 ай бұрын
Im surprised the astronomers said something wrong. 13:50. So the thing about that is that it is because of the speed of light, and it took that long for the light to reach you. But it's not only the speed of light. it's the maximum speed of the universe. For example, if the Sun disappeared, we wouldn't know for around eight minutes. That's because that's how long the light would take to reach us. But it's not only the light. it's everything that affects us from the sun, like the gravitational pull. The gravitational pull wouldn't be noticed instantly ethier it would be noticed when we saw the light. That's because everything's maximum speed is the speed of light. So if this beetlejuice plant/star, i don't know what it is, disappeared, we wouldn't feel the effects of its disappearance until we saw the light. Sorry if the English is bad, im only 15, and im not from an English speaking country. Also, source: i learned this from watching a video from Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
@viniwittke8 ай бұрын
@@altaccount9716 While you're correct about the gravity, quantum entanglement seems to be defying that definition of "maximum speed of the universe". Sure, we both don't know anything about quantum mechanics, but it is what scientists are saying. Quantum entanglement would "travel" in space-time instantly, or so it seems.
@MatthewJohnson-hi2th7 ай бұрын
@@viniwittkepretty sure this isn't true, and that quantum entanglement can't actually allow transfer of any amount of information faster than the speed of light. There is what appears to be "simultaneous" events taking place at a distance wrt some frame of reference, but no information can be transferred in the process. I'm not an expert though, I'd suggest looking into the EPR paradox if you want to learn more.
@viniwittke7 ай бұрын
@@MatthewJohnson-hi2th Nice, I read more about it and found out about the "no-communication theorem". Interestingly enough, not even scientist are sure about it, therefore it's still only a theorem. But if there is one thing I learned from looking at the past is you can't believe our boundaries of science will remain the same through the decades/centuries. Without any reason beyond belief in the human capabilities, I think eventually humanity will find a faster way (to at least send information) through space-time. Cheers and thanks for the comment!
@TheRyanK3 ай бұрын
I can't even, my mother has been a tarot card reader and done astrology for over 40 years and I can tell you it's just feelings and stories. And look that's fine if that's what you are into. But it's not based on fact and science. And it's ok, just dont get it twisted to be anything else.
@jaspherdansalan6352 жыл бұрын
If your psychologist/therapist thinks astrology is comparable to psychology? RUN! RUN VERY FAST!
@Lina_al_j2 жыл бұрын
indeed! there's a chance they don't actually have any degree
@junietunes2148 Жыл бұрын
So, have you never heard of Carl Jung? He used astrology and it's archetypes to understand and describe human psychology. It is a tool used by many psychologists and therapists.
@benjamincote4309 Жыл бұрын
@@junietunes2148 And jung also believed in alchemy which anyone with a few neurons understands is ridiculous. Jung's expertise was never in astronomy and using him as an example is quite fallacious.
@junietunes2148 Жыл бұрын
@@benjamincote4309 Alchemy led to chemistry and astrology led to astronomy. Also I was responding to someone saying a phychologist/therapist who uses astrology as a tool was bad, when there are plenty of therapists that use it as a tool.
@Jokr0005 Жыл бұрын
@@junietunes2148 And he is a very controversial figure because of that. They don't even teach Jung anymore and no approved therapist uses those archetypes.
@Bigdaddyn7442 жыл бұрын
Astrology works because they have a large list of qualities that 'could' apply to basically every person.
@dalaleela14532 жыл бұрын
Ur right
@kiraparson27462 жыл бұрын
You should look up your birth chart
@Bigdaddyn7442 жыл бұрын
@@kiraparson2746 I shouldn't
@carlacista2422 жыл бұрын
You know what, it doesn't work like that, I've seen people sh*tting on astrology too much in this comment section. If you don't know someone that actually studied astrology than do not talk about it like you know it so well, no you didn't find the trope. What you are talking about is the commercial and cheap astrology. Astrologers study for a reason, please be respectful (from person who is currently studying astrology)
@unratutox15432 жыл бұрын
@@carlacista242 studying astrology is like studying religion. If it makes you happy go for it but don't treat it as a real science and don't let it affectbthe way you treat others.
@Karuan3 жыл бұрын
sorry but to me this feels like actual historians talking to nerds with star wars legends history knowledge
@wholewheatcracker35613 жыл бұрын
Straight up
@devon26673 жыл бұрын
LMAO
@sevgi60263 жыл бұрын
Yess
@maranamni87693 жыл бұрын
Dudee
@annalaszlo39563 жыл бұрын
Kinda, except Star Wars nerds at least have interesting stories to tell AND they don't claim it's real history
@badonkalover5 ай бұрын
never knew jubilee comments are so one sided lmao
@littlethings39233 жыл бұрын
How do everyone on this show comes with so much patience? The amount of time I rolled my eyes in this episode is in 100s.. Where do you find this calm people?
@CleoraAleise3 жыл бұрын
What is there to be upset about? Someone will always have a difference in opinion.
@mariosmatzoros35533 жыл бұрын
@@CleoraAleise Except for the fact that one of the sides is based on facts and the other is based on ludicrous made up things and opinions.
@luckyduck_.3 жыл бұрын
@@mariosmatzoros3553 in your opinion
@jjordynnn87403 жыл бұрын
@@luckyduck_. no its not an opinion its a fact. One is made up of literal science and proof the other is backed by opinions thoughts and feelings.
@luckyduck_.3 жыл бұрын
@@jjordynnn8740 again in your opinion
@violetstudy28033 жыл бұрын
i feel like dharmic religious people (hindus, buddhists, jains) vs new age spiritualists might be a fun one considering a lot of new age spiritualists tend to distance themselves from the religious roots of it.
@raiha14253 жыл бұрын
YES
@cbicommentbureauofinternet52903 жыл бұрын
Need West vs east religious debate
@storyalchemist_3 жыл бұрын
Yes please!
@milkbeforecereal92573 жыл бұрын
so true pls
@imiguifurr3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely... Just looking at the mess they've made of astrology is enough to convince me
@marco-jn4ew3 жыл бұрын
"I’m a cancer rising, so I feel the moon" The cringe, make it stop!!
@ramiromunoz11613 жыл бұрын
I had to pause it for a minute to bear the cringe
@aliquidgaming10683 жыл бұрын
I wanted more I'm dying of laughter
@acrazyteen15072 жыл бұрын
Timestamp pls :)
@Wafflesrbetter2 жыл бұрын
@A crazy teen 11:50
@hayleymathisen2 жыл бұрын
Each sign has a ruling planet. The sign of Cancer is ruled by the moon which means people with Cancer placements feel more connected to the moon and the energy it gives off based on which sign it’s in. Sounds silly but if you understood Astrology aside from sun signs, which is really a very small percentage of what Astrology is, then it all adds up.
@trimeresuruspurpureomaculatus2 ай бұрын
Astrology just Barnum Effect.
@eladmint2 ай бұрын
Forer*
@SolitudeVolante3 жыл бұрын
The astrologers are trying so hard to support their side. And astronomers are just chilling, I love it.
@marilenakatsioti3 жыл бұрын
yeah, because the astrologers are the misinterpreted ones. (no i don't think astrology is a science)
@nguyetminhhuynh21283 жыл бұрын
Because one thing is real, the other thing is just belief made to be real.
@M.I.223 жыл бұрын
I didn't find all of the astronomers chill at all to be honest 😅
@ShadowJinxXOX3 жыл бұрын
How can you not want to "try hard" in proving your side of the spectrum when its so heavily misrepresented? Astrology is like a color wheel, we have the sun signs - what everyone practically knows - which would be considered as the color red for an example. But then, as you learn more, you'll find out that there's in fact many different hues of red, which differentiates the people of that category. Along with people having more than one color in their birth chart as well. If you imagine the birth chart as a painting, then obviously no person's painting is going to look exactly the same. There's going to be a variety of color splashed about it in varies ways that can only be unique to yourself, based on your houses and planarity placements. This is to only explain what Astrology is, not prove that its scientific based, but to at least show that its more than just saying "Omg you're such a Virgo!" or "Eww I can't date him, because he's a Scorpio." Its like saying that this person is only [insert nationality], when they're that but also so much more which defines their identity; religion, culture, ethnicity, geography, etc.
@nashi._.75633 жыл бұрын
The astronomers weren’t chill tho lol There were some moments where you could tell they were tense especially the guy in the middle
@oak37853 жыл бұрын
when he said "when the moon is far it's less waves" and the astronomer was like "ehhhhh" LMAOO i remember doing the moon's gravitational forces in classical mechanics and being surprised that being far also increases waves and not decrease them
@andreworbs3 жыл бұрын
One peice.
@bradlytshigeng73503 жыл бұрын
Heart pirates! Let's go!!!
@oak37853 жыл бұрын
@@bradlytshigeng7350 ROOM
@sciencecompliance2354 ай бұрын
The moon being further away would make for smaller tidal changes, but the tides depend on both the Moon AND the Sun and also where on Earth you are relative to the positions of these objects.
@aaronncollier963 жыл бұрын
Astronomers: "So why do you believe in astrology?" Astrologers: "Energy"
@mihirkadam86693 жыл бұрын
classic example of pseudo science being to used to its maximum limit. "we are 70% water " xd
@dariascult3 жыл бұрын
astrology is not a BELIEF.
@Blue743 жыл бұрын
@@dariascult Then what is it?
@kadijahmcintosh10553 жыл бұрын
That exactly what astrology is so what are you trying to imply?
@Blue743 жыл бұрын
@@kadijahmcintosh1055 Define energy
@josss_ie80833 жыл бұрын
I wish the question was "Is astrology real?" instead of "is it a science?"
@yehnayz3 жыл бұрын
fr like i think 90% of astrologers and people who like or are into astrology know its not a science, bc u cant prove it- but you could say same thing with “time” … we don’t REALLY know if its 12:52pm rn
@pnut3844able3 жыл бұрын
They're snowflakes, they don't wanna "hurt their feelings."
@saubhagyatandon47873 жыл бұрын
@@yehnayz what do u mean we don't REALLY know the time, u do realise that is an construct, right? We ourselves divided the day in 24 parts called hours, they could have easily just been any other number without it changing anything
@compa62513 жыл бұрын
@@pnut3844able unironically saying "snowflake" is like still making "i identify as an attack helicopter" jokes in 2021. It's not 2014, grow up
@pnut3844able3 жыл бұрын
@@compa6251 cool story bro. No one cares.
@roxienatura Жыл бұрын
A friend of mine told me “astrology is religion wearing a lab coat”, and this video sure does show a lot of that lol.
@BrandonBDN Жыл бұрын
That’s disrespectful to religions…
@spicytargaeryan Жыл бұрын
@@BrandonBDNMay I ask what the difference between astrology and other spiritual practices are?
@BrandonBDN Жыл бұрын
@@spicytargaeryan Astrology is probably false and conflicts with science Most spiritual beliefs usually have not been disproven and usually do not conflict with science Religion (according to its followers) has been proven and does not conflict with science
@PaperParade11 ай бұрын
@@spicytargaeryanI mean would you like to get specific or do you simply mean both types are employing faith for their beliefs? Cause, duh.
@spicytargaeryan11 ай бұрын
@@PaperParade I don’t “mean” anything. I’m asking a question
@lalagurl712 жыл бұрын
My heart died when she said psychology doesn’t use the scientific method... it is a real science people !
@confidential303 Жыл бұрын
it b is kind a sad that you are studying psychology , the real psychologists were open minded in those days
@PresidentJeanAuguste Жыл бұрын
@@confidential303 Your sudden reponse after 4 months is news to me
@silvervixen007 Жыл бұрын
Yeah.. I don't know why she said that
@jailafrappecommetaimes2931 Жыл бұрын
Its ability to experiment effectively is very limited by ethics and uncontrollable variables, it doesn’t sit at the same standards as the natural sciences
@Senriam Жыл бұрын
Ehhhhh, speaking as an individual pursuing a graduate degree, I’d have to say that there are plenty of individuals in the scientific community who are skeptical of psychology’s status as a science.
@axelservellon81572 ай бұрын
Astronomers = People with Jobs and responsibility Astrologist = That unemployed friend on a Tuesday
@kirahh99583 жыл бұрын
It would have been cool if the astrologist have the astronomers a reading 🤓
@mlee-w6643 жыл бұрын
I bet the astrologist would just say "I don't know why, but I'm getting a strong energy telling me that you are a very practical person. Your chart is telling me you really appreciate facts and that is because Jupiter was rising while Mars was in retrograde during your birth.
@lordperezident3 жыл бұрын
It'd be cool if you spell checked lmao
@kirahh99583 жыл бұрын
@@lordperezident it'd be even more cool if you weren't a prick but hey, we all can't have what we wish for 🥺
@lordperezident3 жыл бұрын
@@kirahh9958 lmao I wish that was the case :(
@gaminglegend3 жыл бұрын
@Michael I think anyone could
@HouseMDaddict3 жыл бұрын
As a person with a psychology background astrology is not in the same vein. Astrology is closer to a religion than a science. It's based on beliefs and interpretations. Psychology is actually based on neuroscience and chemical imbalances which you measure and see.
@chaithusridhar73 жыл бұрын
I agree, bur psychology can't always be supported by science either... therapists often look at different people and diagnose and therapizine based on who they are and their stories and beliefs not just what their brain looks like
@alanisf54163 жыл бұрын
yes it surprised me that someone who studied psychology belives in astrology because you can explain most of personality traits by peoples backstory not a zodiac sign
@jinjunliu24013 жыл бұрын
Didn't the replication crisis also affect psychology? Isn't there a lot of p-hacking going on in this field? 👀
@ntr10me3 жыл бұрын
Hi, could you clarify how Psychiatry fits into this as well if you get a moment? Cheers
@genevalillis67563 жыл бұрын
That is exactly what I was thinking. When I heard that comparison in the video, I had to pause.