UND Arrow Preflight and Systems All rights reserved to UND.
Пікірлер: 43
@daytonasixty-eight13544 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I made it all the way up to commercial ASEL training and I didn't know to check instruments, placards, paperwork, etc. Thanks for spending 20 minutes on that.
@jandrews11573 жыл бұрын
Nearly 2 minutes of seizure-inducing intro music and visuals.
@kylezimmerman91856 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation of the landing gear system. This was my primary resource for studying the Arrow systems for my Commercial ASEL.
@Hwantastic226 жыл бұрын
UND materials always satisfy me with super details explanations. It is really helpful for Arrow system. THX!!
@adamriggen72693 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanations. Studying for my CFI initial exam and this helps a lot. Thanks.
It's among the best explanations made for the subject.10Q.
@felixtorres1895 Жыл бұрын
Very thorough and very professional.
@B737AviationPilot8 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. Thank you!
@robinsteiner99613 жыл бұрын
Great video!!! A super valuable resource!
@DVellaio7 жыл бұрын
Congrats. Very complete!
@Aeroguide7 жыл бұрын
Well done on the demonstration. Will help on my Commercial checkride coming up. All hail the Piper Arrow IV lol!
@infotechsailor7 жыл бұрын
only flown warriors. looking forward to learning the arrow, I hear its basically a heavy warrior with retracts
@Aeroguide7 жыл бұрын
Yeah, T or Conventional Tail makes a difference as well. I would recommend conventional
@SangahNoona6 жыл бұрын
Thank you thank you thank you!
@jinwoopark31014 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great tutorial.
@gregjenkins79797 жыл бұрын
LOL not sure how happy line service is about cleaning my windshield.
@neilrampersad42916 жыл бұрын
Great video.
@stephenyoungblood36838 жыл бұрын
Very well done!
@cpuwolf6 жыл бұрын
UND maintenance ....super detail. thanks
@ecorocdrone6144 жыл бұрын
great, congratulations colleague !!
@larsmaage12 жыл бұрын
Great video and explenation!!
@blkpylut8 жыл бұрын
I should really pay attention to this since I flew the Arrow regularly. hahaha
@robertmackay46137 жыл бұрын
Differential throw ailerons deflect at a greater angle upwards than downwards to combat the effects of adverse yaw
@TravelsWithIan4 жыл бұрын
I wish you could remake the exact same video but just better quality. 240P is so terrible OH MY GOD. I appreciate the information though, very helpful.
@LostInSpace1753 жыл бұрын
AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME!
@danduset6 жыл бұрын
great teacher,you should do ground school for the majors.
@uscg9065 жыл бұрын
Love the old fashioned Super8 video?
@johnscarry61124 жыл бұрын
Why is it that every UND video has annoying music playing while the instructor is talking? This one isn’t as bad as many of the others. I fly an Arrow so I thought this would be a good video to watch but the music was too distracting.
@timbo11637 жыл бұрын
Rather confusing point regarding fuel at 17:03.....you say, "100 is typically green, and 80 is red in color". Yet the 100 fuel in your had is blue. (Blue is 100 low lead.) I guess when you say 100 is typically green you are implying it's use is more prevalent than the blue 100LL you have in your hand. Anyway, I had to replay that for clarification. Thanks for the video. Very informative.
@daytonasixty-eight13544 жыл бұрын
For the record. The red fuel 80/82 is no longer available anywhere in the united states. It's been this way for over a decade. I've flown in about 30 different states and hundreds of airports. I have seen ONCE 100 (green) being sold from a pump. It's almost not worth talking about anymore since 100LL is really the only piston fuel available unless you are diesel in which case you use jet-A. So in short, if you can't fly on 100LL and don't have a motor gas STC you aren't flying anywhere. Unless of course you want to order big drums and pump fuel for yourself, but then you always have to return to your home airport. No long XC.
@aryank20005 жыл бұрын
Classic
@zacharycahill231411 ай бұрын
you speak so fast that I had to put the playback speed on.
@LeneMar-zg3hc6 ай бұрын
我看到你也想做跨境電商是嗎
@Elein9673 жыл бұрын
240p, we meet again.....
@mytech6779 Жыл бұрын
Great preflight walkthrough. The "octane" information was highly inaccurate. Correctly called "anti-knock rating" and there are several scales and test methods, it is correct that static compression ration is one of the factors but not as bluntly as presented, the fuel distribution has only minor relation to the required AKR; and even if it did, this is engine has injectors at each cylinder so fuel distribution is actually quite good. The systems info is pretty good overall, but it would be better to leave out the explanations of the finer details. Both because they are not relevent to the pilot in any practical sense, and because the mix of idealized book theory and urban legend does not accurately represent the real complications of practical engineering values thus pointless to memorize at that level of detail.(Sort of like significant digits when taking measurments.) eg, the milspec number for the hydraulic fluid is meaningless because the pilot is not going to do hydraulic maintenance, let alone on the flight line with no service manual. Yes, 14.7:1 is a stoiciometric mix for an average gasoline blend. However, the mechanic is not tuning this engine to idle at that mix for a number of reasons which I won't go into here; instead it would be tuned for certain operating characteristics that likely put it a little on the rich side.