Cop vs The Driver | Give Me Your ID Before I Break Your Window | NOPE!

#wethepeopleuniversity #police #lawenforcement
Original Video: • Tyrant cop violates my...
-------------------------------------------------------
My New Sports Podcast: / @goatdebatemedia
-------------------------------------------------------
Get The Book: Living In The World of Tyranny
www.amazon.com...
-------------------------------------------------------
Submit your video: forms.gle/vbiU....
-------------------------------------------------------
[e-mail]
-------------------------------------------------------
Download our app:
Apple: apps.apple.com...
Android: play.google.co...
-------------------------------------------------------
BODY CAM & DASH CAMS FOR YOU!
ROVE R2-4K Dash Cam
amzn.to/47dkiw1 (Amazon)
BOBLOV M5 2K Body Camera
amzn.to/3semjsT (Amazon)
--------- Budget Friendly Cams --------
Dash Camera for Cars
amzn.to/3FHeX4w (Amazon)
Body Camera with 1080P HD Recording
amzn.to/3QFfQkh (Amazon)
-------------------------------------------------------
Sponsorships: [e-mail].
-------------------------------------------------------
Social Media:
TikTok (We The People University)
Twitter (@Abiyah_WTPU)
Instagram (@Abiyah_WTPU).
Thank you for watching, and we hope you find our content informative and useful.
-------------------------------------------------------
FAIR USE NOTICE This video might contain copyrighted material for which specific authorization from the copyright owner has not been obtained. We are sharing this material for purposes of criticism, commentary, review, and news reporting, all of which fall under the fair use provisions of section 107 in the US Copyright Law. It's important to note that utilizing copyrighted works in this manner for criticism, commentary, review, and news reporting does not constitute a copyright infringement, despite the regulations in sections 106 and 106A.
-------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Please note that We The People University does not provide legal advice or act as an attorney. All information provided is for educational purposes and general knowledge only. In the event that you require legal advice or representation, we encourage you to seek the advice of a qualified attorney.

[@WeThePeopleUniversity]

Cop tried to use his brain in this one. Tricky old fellow 😂 Texas Highway Patrol Facebook: facebook.com/TexasHighwayPatrol?mibextid=ZbWKwL Only if you follow sports come check out my other podcast. My new sports podcast "Thee Goat Debate": youtube.com/@GoatDebateMedia?si=hObFL5BE4dYafned

[@michaelccopelandsr7120]

Keep fighting the good fight, WTPU!

[@ssgemactv]

You're absolutely right about the law grifters and I've come across channels where a guy was talking through a $1000 microphone and a $10000 suit with gucci glasses on saying if a cop orders you out of your car you can legally just told them no and whatever the hell he said after that... Watched a few more of his videos just to see if he was a sovereign citizen and well I mean yes kind of but he was honestly just a legal grifter, not necessarily a sovereign citizen LOLI wish I remembered the name of the channel because ive come across a few channels like that after watching channels like this and Lackluster, John Bryan, Audit the audit and the list just goes on but yeah

[@95percentair]

Thank you! Thank goodness youtube has exposed the gross, awful, abuses of cops and "middle-of-the-road" violations of citizens/human rights (like basic road piracy & how they treat the poor) and as long as we have this tool let it continue! Always film the cops! But there was a point that _some_ 1A audits became cringe (like filming regular ppl from a sidewalk, office settings, basically provoking ppl other than cops to get the cops to come). Some are clearly riding the coat tails of a very serious problem, and I think it backfires on the purpose of the whole thing. I understand 100% the hypocisy of surveillance/cameras everywhere, but there has to be a better way than sticking a camera in the face of ppl trying to do their daily business (who are also overworked and underpaid). I wonder why would anyone give the cops more "ammo" against real activists by upsetting regular citizens, and wonder if super-ridiculous 1As are actually cops undercover, lol. Thanks again Abiyah!

[@runedragone]

what about the right to travel if not involved in commerce no one needs a license registration or insurance as stated in the motor handbook? Case law says it also!

[@Theyliewesleep]

I don't know how your name became Israel but you're the only one I trust that with that name.

[@Donovan_Walker]

That’s the most patient, friendly , and PROFESSIONAL trooper that I’ve EVER seen. Just saying

[@Wjones450]

Agreed

[@Userunknown0010]

😂as he tugs on the car handle though

[@Area51-is6vg]

In NV drivers are allowed to have tinted windows. I have white 4drs tinted windows car. I get stopped by cops all the time during the daytime but not during at night time. As soon i get stopped I wait for the cop to walk closer to my car and then i rolled down all my windows. They would look inside my car and they would tell me you are free to go. I don't say anything to them i would just roll my windows up and go. 🤣🤣😂😂

[@brandon_maurice]

@@Userunknown0010 that was after asking 5 times

[@everardoramirez3709]

This police officer also beat the shit out of a handcuffed gay man and called him a f@gg0t during arrest. I pulled up his disciplinary records and he’s actually not a good person.

[@dannyw7662]

That was the COOLEST officer I have ever seen.

[@scarbo2229]

A cool tyrant is the worst of all. He knew exactly what he was doing.

[@everardoramirez3709]

This police officer also beat the shit out of a handcuffed gay man and called him a f@gg0t during arrest. I pulled up his disciplinary records and he’s actually not a good person.

[@ivepeters]

Dashcams, essential equipment for everyone these days but especially for those pressing their rights.

[@Wranorn]

Was "pressing" the word you wanted to use? I mean it works; I've just never seen it in this context before. Most would have elected to use "pushing". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[@origintrackz5235]

​@@WranornI prefer "Flexing my rights" 😂

[@sulynn72]

He should have just given his license and then argued it in court. Makes me wonder if he wasn't speeding after all. Either that he needs to learn the actual laws before he fights with cops😂

[@tattedup7031]

This cop was very respectful

[@JepsonPA]

Are you serious? He pulled him over for giving him the finger. Its obvious it was retaliation. If it wasn't retaliation he would have given him a ticket. But he would be lying if he gave him a ticket because there is dashcam proof he wasn't speeding. The cop is an absolute tyrant.

[@everardoramirez3709]

This police officer also beat the shit out of a handcuffed gay man and called him a f@gg0t during arrest. I pulled up his disciplinary records and he’s actually not a good person.

[@timhogan745]

Respectful, with his punkass tyrant hand on his firearm..... Such a respectful and helpful blue line gang pussy

[@charlesmoore1980pure]

Been rocking with you for almost 2yrs now and appreciate your knowledge you spread to help us "We the people" to understand our rights💯👏🏾💪🏾

[@MANDALORE380]

@MaddenFifathe courts have already ruled if you operate a motor vehicle and are pulled over you must at least present your license to the officer now if the guy was walking down the sidewalk and the cop just stops him correct he wouldn't due to 4th amendment protections but when your driving it's a different story

[@sharonwilhelm2173]

This is EXACTLY why I like your channel! You tell the truth, even when it isn't convenient. That is the mark of integrity. Plain and simple..

[@oemytech]

TX DPS statute 521.025 states you only have "show" or "Exhibit" your licsense. You do not have to surrender it.

[@MANDALORE380]

And the officer accept that the problem was the guy wasn't even doing that until he felt he had enough to sue

[@LucasJackson_37]

​@@MANDALORE380Right!!! I was just about to make that comment, you beat me to it 😅

[@hawk.wynd.4645]

he could have just gotten the ticket dropped in court as speeding in texas is a two element offense and since the speed limits are presumptive, there are no real speed limits in texas.

[@buddygrimfield7954]

@@MANDALORE380 Well, if he was not in fact speeding at the time. And he can prove as much with his own dashcam (if he had one and it was on). Or if he can get a hold of the trooper's body or dash camera footage and it should illustrate that the stop was indeed retaliatory, and therefore, pretext in nature. Then he definitely has a case. And he really does need to sue. Personally, I think that it was in fact a bogus stop. And the trooper was simply angry that somebody had "given him the bird". Because you only have to show your ID if you actually did commit a crime/traffic violation in Texas. And any attempt to force someone to surrender their ID is a Fourth Amendment violation. Isn't it?

[@vitogriffin8902]

​@@buddygrimfield7954according to the statute police can stop and detain a person to determine if they have a driver's license.... It's a crap law, but it's on the books

[@milesterwillegar9973]

Thank you! This driver is completely WRONG! If a cop pulls you over for ANY perceived violation you MUST upon demand provide legal state law approved documentation. Don't argue roadside law. If you feel you were wrongfully pulled over and written a citation GO TO COURT!. That is where you can try and prove your case. I think this guy was trying to provoke cops just to get pulled over hoping for a rights violation to get a paycheck not because he is trying to uphold his rights.

[@nolanforcier1796]

"Im not always right, but im also not above correction." What a great and humble statement. The world needs more people like you. I admire your self awareness and humility. Thank you for what you do for we the people. Cheers sir. Cheers.

[@damifino1872]

Some people don't know when enough is enough.

[@stellasknifeobsession]

I love the fact that you do it the way you do. Integrity is so important, so why do some auditors sacrifice theirs to convey the wrong info? Money 💰

[@laurierice7687]

​@MaddenFifaAbiyah did Not promote the behavior of this driver. He promoted the correct laws & driver violating them.

[@stellasknifeobsession]

@MaddenFifa incorrect.

[@laurierice7687]

@MaddenFifa You need to watch the video.

[@laurierice7687]

​@MaddenFifaWhat argument?😂 He showed the Texas law saying the driver in a traffic stop must show their license. Which the driver did end up doing. It probably was a retaliatory stop but he still had to show his licence. Now stop being stupid.

[@Nebzz]

@MaddenFifa WTPU admitted himself that he was a bad cop. He said he watched fellow officers make retaliatory stops. Of course he defends the cops.

[@totalenlighten]

Such a nice gentleman officer. He has the control demeanor and patience of a saint. Thank you sir. Sorry for the added stress of the job.

[@KennyTC527]

Honestly the kid was being an idiot and was disappointed the cop treated him nice. He gave the cop the bird and got the attention he so desperately needed.

[@Sh3r-Bear]

Agree! He wanted to get pulled over so he could get his content. If you’re going to do that then you better know exactly what you’re talking about. He doesn’t.🙄

[@mypov8028]

He's an asshole. He's trying to provoke this cop. What if one of his family members has an emergency and needs the cops and they are dealing with some asshole that wants his face on youtube?

[@jeffpadgett1339]

Yup, he just wanted his name and bag number. 😂😂😂😂

[@simrdownmon6431]

Nope, it's not against the law to flip the bird. His civil liberties don't stop because of your opinion. With that being said, aside from probabaly conducting a retaliatory stop, the LEO was very professional, knowledgeable of the laws, and made sure not to escalate the tension.

[@joeswartz8286]

@@simrdownmon6431 It is against the law to speed. That fantastic cop is trying to save your life.

[@bram4818]

In a perfect world I wish all police officers act like this officer did! He’s honorable he shows good character and he’s respectful!!! Thank you officer for being one of the good ones!! 👊🏽

[@CTS_31]

That guy is lucky he got stopped by that officer. A lot of others would have broke his window and arrested him. Maybe it was retaliation, but on the side of the road is not where you fight it. Take it to court.

[@pm5206]

True. Others who are lunatics would have done stuff YT would not allow us to say. Break window, taser, etc.

[@mrperfect87106]

What he should have done is ask for a ticket, not a warning. Then he can prove his case in court.

[@rb8819]

Yes, because if given a warning, it shows to other cops that he was given a warning for speeding and creates a pattern for them to track. When given a ticket and beaten in court, it is supposed to be removed from your record.

[@charleswatkins8558]

I AGREE 100% !! FTP !!

[@creocrimson836]

​​​@@rb8819 I got a ticket for not stopping at a stop sign, my lawyer got it thrown out but the next time I was pulled over (for something I didn't do) the female cop yelled at me because I didn't tell her about it. It was thrown out so why would I mention it and she said it doesn't matter, you still tell me when I ask. So you might need to take a few extra steps to get it removed, not sure why mine still showed. I received a verbal warning but she probably went back to check her dashcam and figured out she pulled the wrong person over. Found out the next day from my coworker who was heading home in the same direction, it was a red SUV that did the double illegal lane change and ran the light while I was always in the right lane and only moved one lane to get in the turning lane and did not run the light so not sure how she mixed a blue ford focus with a red SUV. She never apologized and was a complete tyrant the entire stop and said she was 99% sure it was me because I failed to tell her about my dropped ticket when in reality she probably knew she got it wrong and was just being the normal tyrant they are. I wish I would have FOIA request her body cam footage but it was a long time ago.

[@jonstone9741]

Mr. Perfect, It would be crazy to ask for a ticket instead of a warning. If a cop is willing to let you off with a warning, consider it your lucky day, and take the warning. It would be stupid to go to court and try to prove you were going 75 instead of 81 after the cop offered to let you off with a warning. The judge would think you're insane.

[@mrperfect87106]

@@jonstone9741 Not if I have proof and to show that he did it to violate my 4th amendment rights. Hell no, I’ll take that ticket and go to court all day everyday!!!!

[@steveperry1910]

You are absolutely correct. I too am a former Texas police officer. I watch many of your videos, and I think you and your channel are one of the best auditors on you tube. I also believe there needs to be polce reform. You were correct in letting people know there's lots of miss information given out from a lot of auditors. In this video the driver is certainly required to show his identification. It was a valid traffic stop, and he is required to ID. A lot of auditors I see, are purposely disrespectful and antagonize officers by cursing at officers. Granite, there's a lot of officers that don't have the training and understanding of the law, or choosing to violate our constructional rights. They take advantage of the public, that don't know the law, like as well as a trained police officer. I quit after serving 6 years as a officer. I was expected to take advantage of people that don't know the law, and lie to people. There's something wrong with law enforcement , if you have to break the law to enforce the law, there's a problem with that. We were sworn to protect peoples rights under the law. Alot of police officers forget they work for the public. They are no better of a person than the public they serve. It really disturbs me to watch some auditors taking a perfect chance to expose bad policing , only to give auditors a bad reputation by the way they conduct themselves in there interactions with police. Police officers need to remember they work for the public, and they need to treat the public like they would want to be treated, if they were being stopped by the police. Officers need much more training and accountability for there actions.. Again applaud you for the way you conduct your channel. Have a great day.

[@vonwoolf9963]

In the US, police officers can lie and fabricate any traffic violation in order to get your ID ? That's insane.

[@AngryJT]

Can't they do that anywhere in the world?

[@traphuntnstuff8096]

It’s pretty much true the world over.

[@madtabby66]

And? BTW, how do you know the cop is lying?

[@vonwoolf9963]

@@AngryJT With no actual punishment in case it is proven they are lying ? I seriously don't think so. In the US, cops are rewarding for tricking innocent citizens.

[@genericdude6551]

They do that in a lot of countries.

[@akilliess]

Texas just passed a Law saying its now against the law not to show your ID on a traffic stop reguardless if you think its an unlawful stop. best thing to do is show your DL and fight it out in court.

[@jimmyrichards5595]

If it is determined in court that it was an unlawful stop, what in your opinion should happen? I sure don’t think that nothing should be done in regard to the offending officer! But should it be like, the officer should automatically lose his job? I’m thinking, no. Everybody makes mistakes. There should be a reprimand/punishment though. Perhaps a week or two off the job and paycheck? What would a proper punishment be for the offending/unlawful officer? In my opinion, if an officer is found to have done this three times in a calendar year, then I don’t think they should still have their job as an LEO.

[@akilliess]

@jimmyrichards5595 well then he or she should be held accountable for violating your rights. And in my opinion qualified immunity should not be a thing anymore if you make a mistake at any other job you would be fired. And yes I agree everyone makes,but with the police it's becoming a everyday occurrence. How many times are they supposed to cost the tax payers money before there supposed to be held accountable. I don't think we should have to pay for their mistakes. So to answer your question I feel like if they knowingly pulled you over and made an unlawful stop they should lose their job if it was an honest mistake then no but there are way to many cops that hop from department to department and never change their behavior. So if they start getting desertified and fired possible charged for deprivation of rights under color of law.

[@newhorizon1355]

Facts, plus they need to put up billboards reminding ppl it's a privilege not a right.

[@rezz084]

I’ve learned that we have no rights. Evil people in power will do whatever they want. Judges will usually side with cops even if they’re wrong. We can only hope for comets or asteroids.

[@jasonhill9025]

​@@newhorizon1355traveling by any modern conveyance is a right and has been ruled on 11 different times by SCOTUS.

[@wolfrage8765]

Thank you for putting the truth out there, all of it. Even if some people don't want to hear the other-side of the truth.

[@KiddPanther]

This cop has got to be the most professional cop I've seen in one of these videos. Addressed everything the OP said, but stayed on task.

[@RushMMCXII]

Good grief that donut jockey was ready for retirement back in the 1970’s. The driver knows enough to be a danger to himself.

[@Eagle8]

Exactly! He didn't read the entire memo.😂😂

[@jackshafto9123]

Meddling auditors are a danger to themselves

[@laurierice7687]

Agree with you 💯%! People need to know the laws before posting on KZbin & influencing other people. Otherwise, they are not providing a service.

[@MrSteve1015]

Well said.

[@nbeneby]

Thanks for raising awareness of this issue for us

[@HazeOfWhearyWater]

All cops should be as nice as that guy.

[@HG-Studio]

I’m sooooooo glad you released this video! There are plenty of bad cops doing bad things but not every situation rises to an unlawful stop. It’s one thing to refuse showing ID when not driving but when behind the wheel your options are greatly reduced. Trying to make something out of nothing doesn’t help our cause. Both sides need to stay within the law.

[@TRC19999]

3:08 thank you for keeping it real here. I thought that he’d have to give his ID if it is a traffic stop too.

[@tenin982000]

@MaddenFifa lol so clueless

[@falseprophet1024]

"Lawfully detained" are the key words in the statute.. my guess is the cop has zero evidence of him speeding..

[@Pixeltrainer]

That guy DESERVED a ticket for wearing those HIDEOUS red pants!

[@pingfl]

Thank you for being fair and objective

[@drunkwoodswyllia4885]

Abiyah, this is why I respect and look up to you Sir! Thank you for educating us!

[@honestcitizen1983]

You are correct.😢truth hurts sometimes. You are right.

[@Kodiah-]

Isn't it crazy they can resort to violence because you won't show them a piece of plastic with your name on it over something miniscule.

[@MooKau_]

... and can still work out who you are thru the plate on the car and records, including what you look like, without that card.

[@ignaciojimenez3866]

I think the driver is in the wrong you don’t prove your innocence on the side of the road you do that in court

[@MooKau_]

which is all very good and well to say, but that still wastes a pile of your time to prepare for court, travelling to court, and be there for a day to hear the case... all for something that they could of worked out already, and/or is made up.

[@jskyg68]

Yeah it's crazy isn't it? imagine if we had criminals running around that end people and force themselves on women/kids, car jack, rob and thieve, of course the cops know you aren't one of these wanted people they just ask for ID to screw with you... And yet they are the first ones you call when someone jacks you up or screws you over....hypocrites.

[@jackfallat9516]

@@MooKau_ , BINGO ! Most of the time its made up for revenue.

[@notduhpopo]

The law is not set up to protect you. The law is set up to take your money.

[@benvoeller8946]

Really? How does that comment fit in here? HE GAVE HIM A WARNING! It didn't cost him anything other than looking stupid.

[@anon4854]

@@benvoeller8946 The warning stays on record so the next time it's almost a guaranteed ticket. The big takeaway was getting the ID so the cop can spread the name around so other officers know to target the driver.

[@licensedprofessional4742]

Reminds me of a song by Judas Priest "Breaking The Law, Breaking The Law!" 😂

[@veger2001]

If your not 100% sure of the law then it's always a safe bet to comply to an order or demand! you can refuse when they ask but as soon as they demand then you have standing in court and you can sue them for amendment violations!.

[@Sean-pc8zs]

statutes, codes, ordinances, mandates aren't laws

[@itseithergonnaworkoritaint7852]

Plus it never works out when a "supervisor" shows up because they will always side with their underling.🙄

[@madtabby66]

Exactly. Most supervisors are even bigger D’s that’s how they got promoted.

[@kevinphillips150]

Situation dictates.

[@Taylorchef]

Not every time. I've seen videos right here on KZbin where the supervisor shut the uniformed thug down.

[@itseithergonnaworkoritaint7852]

@@Taylorchef Yeah but the majority of the time it gets worse. Usually the super visor is the one that will escalate.😯 I'm sure you've seen when a 🐖 get a vacation from when he committed redrum or pum mels an inno cent shortly after returning they get a pro motion.🤨🤷

[@Taylorchef]

@@itseithergonnaworkoritaint7852 ya got me there.

[@DTBaker-gq4fd]

I appreciate your integrity. Your honesty is refreshing.

[@briantaylor9697]

This is one of the better examples of what not to do. Please stop arguing with police with information you've gotten off the internet.

[@basanistes359]

Just comply huh? Keep licking the boot.

[@zackari]

You must love the taste of leather 👅🥾🥾

[@modernretroradio993]

It was a retaliatory stop. Cop was 100% wrong.

[@darin5794]

He's a first amendment lawyer. 😂

[@creocrimson836]

​​@MaddenFifa He still thinks that but it's always better to fight in court and not on the streets. Being arrested doesn't always help with a lawsuit, you're better off complying in situations like this then filing a complaint and lawsuit for 4th amendment violation and first amendment retaliation. Notice how he never badmouthed the guy having his rights violated, he simply tried giving the best info against these corrupt cops so you have a better chance in court. You need to remember we're on the same side and should be fighting together for a better future ❤

[@mtdewandal]

Actually, we need a lot more police like this guy.

[@nuclearmedicineman6270]

*"lawfully* detained" appears to be a requirement in that statute.

[@je.9793]

From how it appears, he was lawfully detained.

[@glumberty1]

Being pulled over for speeding, whether he was speeding or not, is lawful detainment.

[@daniellenard2872]

That guy is probably retired then got that job , no one is that nice , he is so professional I would have cooperated just based on how friendly and nice he was

[@licensedprofessional4742]

Agreed ❤

[@notsomadscientist9602]

Hell I might have even apologized for flipping him off... maybe

[@jaimeortega4940]

In Texas that amended 38.02 is a BS. They have an updated hardware/software package called TLETS which automatically scans you license plate and pulls up your DL and insurance. In essence they don't need to ask you for anything because they already know. Now ok instead I would provide my DL "Under duress I will provide you my DL as I have committed no crime and you have refused to show me your radar gun proving I was speeding. Any falsely written ticket at this point is and illegal manipulation of a state instrument." And leave it at that you will in all likelihood be sent on your way as the trooper created a testable argument by lying and stating, "Hey boy you was drivin' 81 in uh 75." You respond, "Ok let's see your radar gun." His likely response "Ok goodbye."

[@WilliamOfficeSupply9832]

In which is a Federal Crime, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242 Title 18 U.S.C. Section 241 Fourth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment

[@stephansmith3881]

Officer's have no duty to show anybody their radar gun. As far as you know, it may not have even been your speed on it.

[@sazude2]

What if they don't say, "ok goodbye?"

[@simonesmith8799]

THANK YOU!!! so glad you did this

[@alastermyst]

Unfortunately, the courts don't care if the cop is committing a crime. Retaliatory stop? Hell, detainment or arrest for literal, clearly established 1a rights? Too bad. Your charges may be dropped but the cop(s) won't be criminally charged. Cop detains you and demands ID? Well, in most states you legally have to provide it at the time because the courts have taken the stance of "if someone claims to be a cop, you must obey everything they say or else". That is of course insane given self defense rights and 4a rights, but the courts are corrupt so...

[@cheesycheese7100]

There is no proof that the intentions of the police officer were retaliatory

[@alastermyst]

@@cheesycheese7100 Proof isn't needed in court. Evidence is. Hell, sometimes even evidence isn't needed because for example most traffic courts convict without any evidence, just the word of the cop alone which by definition means citizens are guilty unless they can "prove" themselves innocent. But I digress. Is there evidence here that a jury could use to convict the cop for retaliating? Sure. 1) if the driver does have a dashcam and it proves he wasn't going the speed the cop is claiming to have known he to be going. 2) There is possibly circumstantial evidence in the nature of enforcement records. As in "this cop has never enforced this law this way ever... but now suddenly is. What is different about this case?" For example of 2, I forget where but there was a city where the cops went to the house of copwatchers and combed through the city code to find something, anything, to punish them for and chose things like distance from the curb being slightly too far according to code. Courts ended up throwing it out because there isn't history of cops actually enforcing that law.

[@bwright138]

You do realize that relevant, admissible evidence is by its nature “proof,” right?

[@sazude2]

And some of the people in the comments are still being morons talking about how the cop was "nice, so you should..." Nice when he was being retaliatory? If what is said is true then the stop was also illegal, but only the driver I GUESS is supposed to be main bad guy here because he denied ID, which the driver thought was right. SMH

[@user-qe7tc6og6q]

Well I must admit that's the nicest police officer I've ever seen, fair play to him.

[@creocrimson836]

They do a written warning ticket because it shows other cops that they received a warning for that the next time you are stopped. Sometimes they go a step further like writing hostile to the police so that they give you a hard time next time. Unfortunately there's not much you can do to fight a warning because it has nothing to do with the courts and is pretty much for police reference only. This is 100% retaliatory and fighting it will be hard. That's not to say you shouldn't but this is why people hate cops because they can get away with this crap and there's almost nothing you can do about it.

[@greg11786]

He's like 30 years past his retirement lmao

[@frankdoss6313]

I was cringing the whole time the driver was refusing

[@marcmayhem0412]

​@MaddenFifa More likely because the view seeking butthead extended a warning stop into a 10 minute video for social media.

[@falseprophet1024]

​@@marcmayhem0412 This seems very much like a retaliatory stop.. i cringed because i knew the cop would win with his bullshit, even though he is probably lying his ass off..

[@everardoramirez3709]

@@marcmayhem0412you sound like a bootlicker

[@CB-qb8hj]

According to Democrats you don’t need to show your ID to vote in federal elections.

[@10ring60-bp5ml]

And there is enough sickening police actions out here to not know YOUR laws in the area your at.Its in every nook and cranny in the USA period

[@Good-Citizen]

You are being very fair, honest. Thanks!

[@keithgriffin761]

why individuals who put their life on the line to serve our government, in the name of freedom, only to return home and accept a paycheck to violate freedoms, is beyond me

[@swashkiv7509]

You think we wage wars overseas for “freedom?” lol how naive or young are you?

[@armannstraughter3296]

@@swashkiv7509fr

[@DrSammyMunchkin]

It's the American way 🇺🇸

[@brianwebber6996_ROADHUNTER]

"In the name of freedom"?!?! If they're serving to protect our freedoms, and the USA has been at war nearly continually since it's inception, why have we become so unfree??

[@wheressteve]

Thin skinned, armed, dangerous and completely unaccountable.....what could possibly go wrong ?

[@jeffveldhuizen9952]

The thing with this video is it shows that the cop is lying about why he stopped him, which makes the stop unlawful if the jury is not stupid, it won't matter how the cop plays his cards

[@stephansmith3881]

How does it show the cop is lying?

[@stephansmith3881]

@MaddenFifa He walked away because the encounter was over. He had the drivers ID and had already written the warning. What else was he supposed to do?

[@stephansmith3881]

@MaddenFifa OK, that doesn't really matter. The officer was able to confirm the driver's identity by getting his license number, which was the whole point. That warning will show up now every time he is pulled over in the future.

[@stephansmith3881]

@MaddenFifa Correct, but he needed to confirm. As an example, this dude might have been driving a friend's car.

[@user-dk7vv9nc4b]

The cop said it’s only a warning because he doesn’t want to back up his lie in court against a dash cam…as a CDL holder, warnings go against my license and I could lose my license if I have to many warnings in a certain time, so I would have demanded that he gave me a ticket so I can get it dismissed in court

[@licensedprofessional4742]

Strategic Intelligence 💯

[@middle-agedmacdonald2965]

Wow, thanks for the info. As a person who has a youtube law degree, I too thought some of those things were real things the police had to do or couldn't do, etc. Thanks for setting us straight on that. Particularly the supervisor comment. I thought they all had to do it if asked.

[@brianstewart3916]

Glad you're sharing Facts. Some can't handle the truth.

[@furtleturtle6794]

Lying comes so natural and easy they don't know when they are lying!!!

[@gmmaupin]

This may or may not have been a retaliatory stop, but this cop was VERY patient. The guy who was stopped just comes off as a jerk. If he was fishing to make a cop violate his rights, that is rather sick.

[@peterklop9015]

My thoughts exactly. Also, when you want to be disrespectful by giving a cop the finger, you’re asking for it and shouldn’t whine when you get it.

[@jaybeemhardscrote7466]

​@@peterklop9015 excuse me? No! That's the exact opposite of freedom! You're saying you are okay with cops pulling over people who voiced their displeasure with them. That's fucked, maybe you should move to North Korea fuck that.

[@timmyholland8510]

Traffic stop should be viewed as possibly dangerous. I wouldn't blame anybody for giving their ID.

[@kicojess3202]

Did he really just ask why the man is acting like this when he is a vet?

[@user-rp6eb7cc9q]

Thank you for putting that truth out there. It needed to be said!

[@user-rp6eb7cc9q]

@MaddenFifa what wasn't truth? If you're going to rebuttal a comment, at least be prepared to explain the "reasoning". What specifically is not true?

[@albertvonschultz9137]

I agree that you covered that video quite well and I agree with you on the whole situation

[@albertvonschultz9137]

@MaddenFifa Well what was discussed in this topic? I was already thinking it due to be an ex law enforcement also, but but I was trained 35 years ago.

[@albertvonschultz9137]

@MaddenFifa Well. I agree it was unlawful but on the side of the road is no place to argue right or wrong. He claims he was doing 81 was the reason he pulled him over.

[@michaelcaputo383]

That trooper was very respectful, the way this guy was acting was unreal!

[@user-zk7ip2cn6z]

Also note that you are under custodial arrest in Texas traffic stops and you must demand that they read you your Maranda rights and always follow their demands under duress or threatened with arrest and ALWAYS RECORD

[@mainid2490]

Noticed you didn't provide the law to back your statement. Most pointing out a section of law to make everyone aware of it, cite the actual law. Which you didn't.

[@robertschoelerman7496]

I respect the honesty this is the only way it works

[@Matrix_Mechanic]

It’s a shame a military veteran would buck law and order. He’s a disgrace

[@frakplease3771]

You have the Right and Duty not to follow illegal orders. It's a shame you don't know much.

[@Matrix_Mechanic]

@@frakplease3771 lol. It’s not illegal because you want it to be. lol. Suck an entitled generation

[@Accumulator1]

​@@frakplease3771obviously you don't know what the laws are. Your loss.

[@Sean-pc8zs]

@@Accumulator1 statutes aren't laws, obviously YOU don't know the laws, the real actual laws. it was an unlawful stop, no i.d. needs to be shown, and the cop attempting to break his window to unlawfully detain and arrest him is illegal and We The People can and should use deadly force to defend ourselves and others from unlawful arrest / detainment as it is legally classified the same as attempted kidnapping.. Learn the actual laws before you go yapping off your flap dude...

[@JDog-tn8we]

I’m glad you shared the video and the information. Thank you!

[@Iamrightyouarewrong]

You never have to TALK to law-enforcement AT ALL,....but as an operator of a motor-vehicle, you have to be able to prove it.

[@madtabby66]

If you’re going to be silent, you have to plead the 5th, you can’t just be silent. And don’t say you want to”a lawyer dawg” because somehow that means you want a canine lawyer.

[@kevinphillips150]

The burden of proof is with the law enforcement official.

[@stevenhunt3113]

If you are pulled over, the driver is required to present identification to the officer. Although drivers license in itself violates of the constitution, most states have laws requiring them; and if the officer stops you, you are reqired to present it, your registration ( another violation ) and proof of insurance, ( yes, that is taxation without representations ), * also note, the officer even admitted it was a retalitory stop. ** And thank you for your explaination, even admitting that you to have been guilty of being human and allowing your emotions to rule over your actions. That honesty is the reason I watch your show.

[@basanistes359]

"Lawfully" It wasn't lawful. So you're wrong. Retaliation isn't lawful.

[@yaramyahawa6729]

"Alleged Traffic Violation" is the key phrase. So yeah, unlawful or not. You still have to ID.

[@basanistes359]

@@yaramyahawa6729 Nope. Fruit of the poison tree gets thrown out. I don't I.D.

[@boydcaudel8453]

My sentiment exactly 💯

[@basanistes359]

@@yaramyahawa6729 Imagine your logic taken to an extreme level. You're not supposed to resist an officer. So a cops can rape a woman and she shouldn't resist because she can fight it in court later, right? Cops can do anything illegal and you're just supposed to take it huh? I bet you deep throat the whole boot, don't you?

[@yaramyahawa6729]

@@basanistes359 Q: thrown out where? A: In court!!

[@WEAPONX4S]

Going to/from El Paso …. They got me around Ozona. It’s a trap. Your speed limit is 75-85mph. You come over intervisibility (IV) line/horizon line… once your vehicle is on a descent, your cruise control adjusts but you’re over for a fraction of a second. It’s a hustle and a shakedown.

[@1028641]

I can't believe, after all that, he still got a warning!!😂😂😂😂

[@everardoramirez3709]

Yes because I wasn’t in the wrong

[@1028641]

@@everardoramirez3709 I'm not disagreeing. It just amazes me that a warning was given after all that. Most cops would nail you with several charges and as we know you would lose!! JMO!

[@bmangler0880]

I have to give this officer credit for his ability to keep his ego in check and deescalate the situation.

[@bmangler0880]

@MaddenFifa Yep, as common as common sense.

[@bmangler0880]

@MaddenFifa I'm not giving anyone credit for common sense. There's a saying, "Common sense is not very common" There is no way for you or I to know if it was actually a legal stop or not.

[@SaltStorm007]

The fact that he said it was going to be a warning after he found out he had all that proof the driver had,speaks VOLUMES💯

[@billrandell4641]

Your 100% correct Mr. Israel....

[@AdWrStR_603]

​@MaddenFifa how so? 😅

[@tenin982000]

@MaddenFifa he gave his id lol. he still got the warning hence the are you going to sign this? lol go watch again

[@stickiedmin6508]

​@@tenin982000 He *_showed_* his ID - he didn't give it to the cop. There was no 'warning' either. The cop gave up when the driver called his bluff. The video shows the driver was absolutely right to hold his ground and refuse to go along with the cop's attempts to intimidate him.

[@tenin982000]

@@stickiedmin6508 lol i guess you missed the piece of paper that he was asking if he was going to sign it or not. i guess you also missed the cut in the video where he did show it. hence the warning. im not saying the cop didn't screw up but the thing is it can go badly for people. like it was mentioned each time he said no it could of been a ticket.

[@stickiedmin6508]

@@tenin982000 So you think people shouldn't stand up for themselves? Because "it can go badly?" When an authority figure lies, right to your face, you don't think it should be challenged? Seriously? The cop *_knew_* he was lying. The driver *_knew_* the cop was lying. The cop tried to threaten and intimidate him but the driver called his bluff and forced him to back down. Why on Earth would anyone willingly cooperate with a dishonest cop who's trying to screw them over?

[@brianwebber6996_ROADHUNTER]

You're a good man, Brother!!

[@jonesywails8382]

6 miles over the speed limit? This is a free range concentration camp, not a free country.

[@madtabby66]

Yes speed limits exist. You can speed, but you have to pay a fee to do so.

[@CyFr]

Driving is a privilege, not a right.

[@jonesywails8382]

@@madtabby66 Guess you have to be an illegal to speed without a license or consequences.

[@jonesywails8382]

@@CyFr no it’s not!! It’s a right stolen and sold back to you as a privilege. You must like slavery and your servitude.

[@tubelance]

Rules is rules. It is weird that in general the limit is thought of as 10 over that number

[@GALTIZER2003]

I cannot believe that cop was being that nice

[@davidwillis5016]

Every individual should research the law and know exactly what it says before you take a position and try to stand on the law, this applies to whatever you're dealing with, be it a judge, a prosecutor, police or your attorney, if you have not read it from a legal document yourself then you do not know exactly where you "legally" stand. Many people have been convicted of a crime because they believed the person they were dealing with was being honest with them, don't fall for it!

[@skinlab4239]

He was getting a warning and verbally warned.. He can go about his day. A warning isn't running someone

[@jaybeemhardscrote7466]

Then what is he doing with his DL if he hands it to him?

[@zachhaag7854]

No, he was getting a written warning that he said all his information would be on this guy's a clown that's Goin to be sadly mistaken when his lawsuits are lost hope those views were worth it

[@zachhaag7854]

If he would have shown it to him not given it his drivers license number would have been on the written warning that the cop said all his info will be on

[@fourgotten]

I appreciate you for bringing this topic up. Your integrity is appreciated, even if some may disagree with you.

[@rockchildofthe60s69]

In Texas this guy actually has to give the cop his ID. The rest of this shit he needs to argue in court not on the side of the road. This guy isn't as smart as he thinks he is. It is a bullshit stop but he should show his id. Even though the cop says he's not getting a ticket he probably should insist he get a ticket and fight the stop in court.

[@rockchildofthe60s69]

@MaddenFifa well he was stopped for "speeding," so yeah, Ironside, he does have to give the cop his ID.

[@geo9774]

Well said!!👏👏👏👏👏cops are finally catching up

[@elijahandtyliah6769]

Abiyah i think the cops was being nice and i also agree he was only trying to get ID because he got the finger which cancels the nice attitude

[@glumberty1]

@MaddenFifa Good luck proving that in court.

[@glumberty1]

@MaddenFifa Beats sticking my fingers in my ears and saying la la la.

[@glumberty1]

@MaddenFifa Driver wasn't cited because he showed his id.

[@glumberty1]

@MaddenFifa By the way, who goes into other people's profiles to see what they subscribe to just because they don't agree with a comment that was made? Do you do that on facebook too? That's like third level creepiness.

[@glumberty1]

@MaddenFifa Not all traffic stops conclude with a citation. That is not what makes a traffic stop lawful.

[@2lefty346]

Hmm... cop is not in the wrong here except for when he tried to open the door. If you're going to flip off a cop, do so while not breaking the law at the same time. This was a good video and Abaya Isreal did an excellent job explaining how the law works in these types of situations. 👏

[@jojojo1687]

Officer isn't a tyrant here. Citizen is a male Karen here

[@chuckthompson5724]

Yep this guy went looking for trouble if he has proof take it to court not on the street.

[@justinhill7224]

The fact that he clearly remembers this particular person flipping him off is clearly telling. Just "show" the ID like he requested. Up against the window so he can read it. "Here's the deal" famous phrase from these cops. Don't fight it on the side of the road. Take your evidence to court and prove them wrong.

[@richardbaker308]

Just comply right? Or maybe hold these tyrants accountable

[@justinhill7224]

@@richardbaker308 only by what's lawfully required of you. Fighting on the stop usually gets more charges stacked against you. That's all I'm saying.

[@johnramirez5996]

Dude was trolling. Respect for the way cop handled entire situation. A+

[@edwardlangdon9256]

Nailed it. Bottom line, argue in court, not on the side of the road.

[@Wacko394]

100%, correct

[@Wacko394]

@MaddenFifa sometimes it cost money to prove or disprove a point. if this guy feels he’s 100% correct he should’ve spent the money to find out he wasn’t.

[@edwardlangdon9256]

@MaddenFifa well if your worried about the money, maybe you shouldn’t flip the bird to cops, or anyone.

[@edwardlangdon9256]

@MaddenFifa sure in a perfect world.

[@marcmayhem0412]

​@MaddenFifathe first amendment doesn't shield you from consequences that may arise from exercising it. You have a right to yell "I have a bomb" while on a plane but you can also expect to go to jail for it. The analogy may not apply here but it's no less true. Any constitutional lawyer could explain it to you and will.

[@charlesbaugh2260]

I’m so glad that you were putting this video out because there is a lot of misconstrued videos out there that mislead people so people need to be aware of the law before they act on it

[@matthewlawson4583]

If he actually had dash cam video of him not speeding, then he didn't have to provide his ID because he didn't break the law and therefore the stop was not lawful. Also, if he had gotten arrested that police officer would have had to lie on a police report, and quite possibly in a court hearing

[@horseathalt7308]

BINGO...finally someone that gets it. The cop must have rAs or PC to stop, and they cannot use retaliation to fabricate it!

[@matthewlawson4583]

​@@horseathalt7308The real challenge would be to find a judge who is honest enough that wouldn't just automatically side with a police officer. The best thing he can do is film the police and put it online... Sunlight is the best disinfected

[@horseathalt7308]

@MaddenFifa It would appear that WTPU is actually still on the other side, a plant if you will. once a cop ALWAYS a cop.

[@zachhaag7854]

Problem is court isn't on the side of the road to determine weather or not it was lawful ... the problem is once the cops go to court there is no accountability at all even if something like this goes to.court and its found to be am unlawful stop Noone is paying the guy for legal representation or the work missed from go to court nothing goes on cops record its just well your innocent next case

[@horseathalt7308]

@MaddenFifa Correct. In any case why make it easy for the corrupt cop at the moment, if he is wrong and or acting with malice, you challenge civilly at that time. They are "officers of the court".

[@drewlosch]

Mama let that boy run the household, the finances and the entire neighborhood from age 3.

[@lissanne9769]

People really need to know their state's laws. It is better to take a disputed traffic violation to court than argue about it on a highway or busy street.

[@stickiedmin6508]

Didn't you watch the video? It was a bogus stop. The driver knew it and the cop knew it too - that's why he gave up. Why on Earth would you advise someone to go along with a cop's lies and accept a phony violation?

[@lissanne9769]

@@stickiedmin6508 Yes, I did listened closely to this video, was it a bogus stop--YES. Was the cop going to change his request for the drivers ID--NO. The cop called in more of his buddies. They would have broken the driver's window, just to get his ID. I'm just saying that arguing this in court can make a difference. I did not ever say as "advice" to go along with the cop's lies. Never, individuals need to know the law and then take your evidence to court. Arguing with cop's rarely gets resolved on the side of the road.

[@stickiedmin6508]

@@lissanne9769 Well, we _know_ that's not true. They never *_got_* the guy's ID, by breaking windows or otherwise. All the threats were nothing more than a bluff on the cop's part. The driver called him on it and he gave up and went away. It seems to me that, if a dishonest cop is trying to retaliate against someone for hurting their feelings (as we see in the video), then the very _last_ thing that person should do is to give any legitimacy to the charade by accepting any 'warnings' or 'citations' and hoping that a court might rule in their favour. Fighting phony charges in court should be the last resort, not the default strategy. When the cop has absolutely nothing on you, and is trying to bluff you into complying with their shenanigans, you _challenge it._ You _call their bluff._ There's nothing to be lost by doing so. If they insist on proceeding to arrest / charge / warn / whatever else, digging themselves even deeper into the lie, *_then_* you cross your fingers and go to court. Nobody is under any obligation to _help_ crooked cops trying to screw them over. You don't deal with this kind of pettiness and dishonesty by appeasing them - that won't change anything. Bullies only back off when you stand up to them.

[@heatherfredenburg7545]

My favorite phrases: "The thing is...." and " If you would just...."

[@brendakimsey]

This stop might have been uncalled for, but i feel like the driver is trying to provoke the officer.

[@IamCrass]

If they ask you to exit you car. I think asking if they are scared of you is a good question. They have to admit their ego or come up with a better reason.

[@Kiazhin]

Anyone operating a vehicle is required to present a license when stopped by an officer, whether or not there is an infraction. But the cop does not have the right to force the door open unless he has committed a crime, not an infraction. This supervisor shit is getting old. It's like a karen asking for a manager.

[@j.hueston4370]

He has the right to open the door only after he tells you to exit the vehicle and you then refuse. He would have the right to remove you from the car and that would entail opening the door.

[@AdWrStR_603]

​@@j.hueston4370right but he didn't ask him to step out at any point so 4th violated ✔️ other than that, the driver saying "git me a sUpErViSoR" over and over was overly annoying 😂😅

[@alexdasensation]

You’re wrong… in this case the officer noted the individual speeding and tracked him on his radar. If an officer stops you and is stating your infraction is something else that he can’t prove you can be secure in your papers as no crime was committed and infraction was present

[@Kiazhin]

@alexdasensation all people operating a vehicle must present a drivers license during a traffic stop. The cop first stated he was speeding. If you think it was an illegal detainment, that is up to a court to decide.

[@arrobrewer2730]

Not the sharpest tool but a complete tool.