Efficiency battle between Ioniq 28 kWh and MIC Model 3 SR+ (LFP)

ts.la/marcus25347
Get 30 day free Premium trial on ABRP by using referral code "Teslabjorn":
abetterrouteplanner.com/ref/t...
Get 20 % discount (also works on discounted prices) when ordering from Stormberg online by using discount code "Teslabjorn" (only ships to Norway, Sweden and Finland):
www.stormberg.com/no/kampanje...
Kempower make awesome EV chargers:
kempower.com/teslabjorn/
Want to sell your Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/selge-bilen/?utm...
Want to buy a Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/biler-til-salgs/...
Leasing a Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/leasing/?...
MisterGreen EV leasing:
mstr.gr/bjornnyland
Results from my range tests, banana box tests and other goodies here:
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
Main folder with everything:
drive.google.com/open?id=1HOw...
ScanMyTesla app for showing battery temperature, etc:
play.google.com/store/apps/de...
/ scanmytesla
www.e-mobility-driving-soluti...
www.e-mobility-driving-soluti...
The OBD dongle I use in Tesla, Leaf, Ioniq, e-Niro, e-Soul, i3, ID3/ID4 (Android only):
www.obdlink.com/products/obdl...
My Artlist playlist:
artlist.io/mycollection/24628...
Most of my music is from Artlist.io. If you sign up for one year and use my referral link, you will get two months free:
artlist.io/Bjørn-42729
Donation links:
streamlabs.com/bjrnnyland
/ teslabjorn
My live channel:
/ teslabjornlive24
Teslabjørn Discord server:
/ discord
Reduce food waste and get great deals on food:
toogoodtogo.no/

[@maximilianholland]

These side-by-side "exact same conditions" tests are actaully the fairest way of comparing consumption/efficiency. Thanks Bjorn!

[@rolandrohde]

Yes, Bjorn is doing a great job, however, the Teslas tend to under-report the consumption quite a bit, so the real comparison should always happen at the charger...

[@sadlogic]

As a Ioniq Fanboy, im satisfied. Bow to the King!

[@JohSno]

Yes, please, re-do 1k km challenge for Ioniq.

[@dennisvanhelden9253]

He'll be doing it with Ioniq 5! 1-2 week wait!

[@florentcoste]

@@dennisvanhelden9253 ioniq 5 is a lot less efficient ;)

[@kasmopaya2676]

And Model 3 LFP 1000 km challenge please!

[@JohSno]

ABC - always be challenging Ioniq efficiency ;)

[@christophersherrington5412]

Yes re-do the 1000km challenge in the classic IONIQ!!!

[@pete9b]

Yes Bjørn, please re-do the km 1000 challenge in the classic 28kw Ioniq. Thanks for the video!!….

[@Jinguapingi]

I bought our first "real" EV (we had a Twizy before) thanks to Bjorn, and it was a Ioniq ! I love it and bjorn's ioniq video convinced us. If sometimes you pass through Geneva, I owe you a beer !

[@meiakla2519]

Oh yes! Please re-do the 1000km challenge with the 28 Ioniq!!

[@riccardomarinoni6733]

Yeah

[@klauskdk4125]

Teslas Efficiency is incredible for a car of that class ☝️

[@meisterkenobicrypto]

Even though they have crazy amounts of power they are still very efficient, it's impressive

[@thosoz3431]

Fantastic It's really happening. The electric car is here to stay.

[@vreauacaunt]

"I'm a big ventilator of you"

[@Pervypriest]

Lol

[@ChuckJ1944]

I am so glad you mentioned frontal area. Some people think that coeficcient of drag is all that is required whereas both are required to figure total drag.

[@ME-cb1vw]

THIS is the video the world has been waiting for Yes, the battery-fan is behind the trim where the light is. You can improve cooling if you dismount the side-trim or at least open the trunk and setting AC on "south pole" while charging.

[@Hans-gb4mv]

I love my Ioniq. Been getting consistent usage of below 9kWh/100km on my trip to/from work the last months with the GOM reporting around 300km of range when fully charges.

[@FFVoyager]

Fantastic! The 'classic' Ioniq is still the car to beat! Given a suitable 100kW charger network, it's perfectly usable. I think small battery + fast charging without compromise is an excellent design as it makes lighter (and cheaper?) cars. And normal people are going to stop for a break every 125 mile/200km anyway so a 10-15 minute 'top up' is not of any consequence. It's still a shame Hyundai messed up the newer 38kWh Ioniq....

[@MrJanJunker]

I'm not sure how much range you get in 15 minutes on this car. It is quite slow to charge in the end. 7-10 minutes would be the maximum time for a quick toilet break I think. After that you are waiting for the car.

[@FFVoyager]

@@MrJanJunker that's true about any EV. With the Ioniq you charge the small battery fast to 80% and move on.

[@marilyncampiz8628]

I recently discovered your videos when I was researching the Hyundai Ioniq EV, found a 2019 with only 16k miles and snapped it up after viewing your challenges and reviews. I really wanted a Tesla, but economically the Ioniq is solid. Your strategy with the road challenges and demonstration for winter driving had boosted my confidence with my purchase.

[@olyalphy]

It just shows how important overall weight is to efficiency. Still super impressive that the MiC Model 3 SR+ was so efficient for such a heavy car. It was a very close battle. But arguably the Ioniq isn't a super practical car with 28kWh battery and 230km range (WLTP). Still, really interesting results.

[@ThePeterOlausson]

As a Ioniq 28kWh driver I can say that as long as you don't need to que at a charger there is no problems driving a 700km trip. Yeah I need to stop 4 times but it doesn't bother me. 15-20 min stop only

[@MrJanJunker]

Well. I do find the Ionic interesting as a second car. We have a Tesla as the primary car. But for at second car the 28KWh bought second hand with a couple of years on the bag would be a nice car. Instead of the 11 year old Peugeot 107 we have currently.

[@marcink5820]

In a fact, it is one of the most practical EVs on the market (actually one of the most practical and economical cars ever made). Because in everyday commute what counts is efficiency. For example, as mentioned, Ioniq easily reaches 12kwh/100km mixed driving. With 70kW charging means your charge speed is 580km/h, even if You appear on weaker 40kW charger, You still get 330km/h. Battery never coldgates, goes 70kW straight up to 80%, your average pit stop on the charger will be about 20min (unless you have to wait until some Leaf 2nd gen tops up). Battery size doesn't matter, efficiency and range does, that's why most OEMs' marketing depts advertise only how many kWh they have, but then it appears you get 30kwh/100km on daily basis and rapidgating on longer trips. What also nobody cares to mention while selling You EV is that You will actually have to pay for the charging, and inefficient EV will be more expensive than a diesel to run. And Yes, TM3 is better, but is also newer and much more expensive..

[@computerbob06]

Ioniq is a lot cheaper though

[@andreabgo4298]

Ioniq 28 is a beast like city effciency. Hyundai had to made a new model Ioniq 35 to discourage people to buy it 😂. After 5 yr my IOniq28 still deliver consumption almost like day 1. impressive!

[@ME-cb1vw]

keep in mind: ioniq28 does not coldgate. There's lots of cobalt in the battery

[@florentcoste]

yes, there is no magic

[@petrihietanen1102]

This was so fun to watch! Thanks Bjørn!

[@geb.strohm]

👍Can't wait for the Winter results😁 Great work, Thanks a lot, boys!

[@patriksteffan2060]

Very chill and happy guy. Great vid. Thx Bjorn!

[@SylverWWA]

1st gen Ioniq is still one of the best cheap but stylish and capable EVs out there! I had the chance to drive it for one week and put 1300+ kilometres in it: it was a fantastic experience and now I want a 1sr gen Ioniq as my first car ever to own ❤ And also: please redo the 1000km challenge with the Ioniq 🙏

[@boostav]

Cheap sure, stylish definitely not.

[@SylverWWA]

@@boostav Compared to a 1st gen Leaf or an i3 or a Zoe, it is definitely more stylish

[@samusaran7317]

@@boostav Better than most lame crossovers on the road.

[@andrewcooke8014]

This video makes me so happy! More head to head videos please.

[@AdamDadeby]

Really interesting video Bjørn. I get 66kW consistently on high power chargers with my classic Ioniq over a wide SoC range. Definitely worth redoing the 1000km challenge.

[@Barbarossa06]

Love these direct comparison tests, you should do more of those

[@mario_supermd6504]

I remember the Ioniq Supercharger video last year: very nice person 😉

[@JoseRamonTB]

Very interesting video, thanks very much, Bjorn.

[@anderspersson6134]

Ioniq Classic or 28 kWh is absolutely a CLASSIC. Thanks guys. Really dig the old Ioniq. Efficiency seems crappy by comparison in the new Ioniq 5. Kind of sucks but....

[@Tom-Norway]

I'm very impressed with the TM3, simply because it's as efficient as the Ioniq 28, only with longer range and faster charging, but as an Ioniq 28 owner, I would like to mention that the ioniq 28 is technology from 2016, and Tesla's technology is the latest

[@ellistreloar2047]

At more than twice the cost of the comparison car, the TM3 should be impressive. The fact that this five year old Korean design car is so efficient is testament to the engineering superiority of the Koreans. Why are the contemporary European cars so poor in comparison? VAG engineers asleep at the desk.

[@minjung3350]

@@ellistreloar2047 What are you talking about? The Hyundai Ioniq Prime costs about the same!

[@ellistreloar2047]

@@minjung3350 The five year old, ICE/Hybrid/EV platform design Ioniq in this video, is a second hand car that is literally half the cost of the brand new, pure EV design, second generation Model 3. Do some research online, you’ll see. It is embarrassing for ALL pure EV engineers including Tesla, VAG, Mercedes, BMW etc that this old, compromised Korean EV design is as good as the best contemporary technology any of the big makers can create. Many ICE owners keep saying that EV technology is changing too fast to buy an EV now and risk falling behind the tech curve. The Hyundai Ioniq proves that is media hype and bull. NONE of the massive car manufacturers, including Tesla with all the power of its technology, has taken a significant step forward in efficiency from the Ioniq. Watch the video again because maybe you didn’t notice that the Ioniq BEAT the Tesla in four out of the five tests. The Tesla lost, fair and square and no amount of fanboy worship changes that.

[@minjung3350]

@@ellistreloar2047 What an argument, the second hand car is cheaper... This Ioniq is sufficient for most situations, but noway a car for the masses. The software is bad in comparison and the range miserable, so you have to rely on working fast chargers, which is a problem sometimes. I would always buy the Tesla, because it has way more possibilities, power, speed, loading capacity and a wonderful charging net. This little consumption difference is negligible and turned around above 120km/h.

[@Gaijin101]

Looks like a win for both tbh :) one is simple, lean and efficient and the other is high tech, full featured n efficient. Cant go wrong either way.

[@BillB33525]

Nice to see you are such a good sport about this competition.

[@CoolSilver]

So am I a watcher or a viewer? :D Yes you should redo the 1000 km challenge with Classic Ioniq. Ooooo Winter test.

[@Jjengering]

Oh yes, more LFP videos please :) I'd love to see best charging practise for LFP.

[@Luis-xr9ye]

Nice vídeo. Yes, 1000kms challenge will be fun! 👌

[@Zedus-rl9hp]

Both cars are impressive. Very efficient old (and fast) Ioniq. It's a shame that Hyundai could not build on this success with the Ioniq 5. And very impressive, that a bigger and heavier Model 3 can almost catch up, and with the 130km/h usually used in Europe, the tables might even turn. Model 3 is a "Eierlegende Wollmilchsau" - egg-laying woolly milk sow

[@jespernrgaardkjr3507]

Same colour as our Ioniq :) Please do the 1000 km test with Ioniq!

[@Pervypriest]

Platinium silver😄

[@rickyb1448]

Same here and SAME year! Yes do the 1000 km test.

[@TheSaschaM24]

16:10 is the fan running? Or isn´t it more like a running follower? :D

[@mateuszbalon3762]

Thanks Bjørn. I was waiting for this test. Ionic is a true efficency king 😃

[@wealox]

Well, the two cars are so close that the battle would be decided at the charging station. The classic Ioniq has high power PHEV cells, only air cooling, and it's also charging slower so it should also win this round very clearly. Comparing with AC and DC charging losses would also be interesting, there might be a slight chance that the Tesla onboard charger is a little bit more efficient.

[@danieslov]

Thanks to You Bjørn I got my first ioniq in 2017, drove 70000 km without any problems at all. Now I’m on my 2:nd ioniq 28 kWh. The new one has only reached 8200 km so far, I still love it.

[@qwacker6429]

I bought an 2017 Ioniq 28kwh based mainly on the 1000km challenge results. I would like to see if it is even better than I thought! It is a poorer persons Tesla model 3 ... and I am delighted with it.

[@KapitanBombaKopa]

Funny because you add this movie in the same time, when I was buying my own ioniq. I've made 250km with one short charge at Ionity and it's so impressive! BTW it's funny when you know about the car more than the seller

[@scottyas602]

Yes Bjorn, please re-do the 1000 km test with the classic, 28kwh Ioniq, would be very interresting...

[@sai-hymlee5984]

Would be interesting to test the 39.2kwh battery version of the Ioniq, I've just driven to Bristol from Birmingham and back and achieved 4.8 miles per kW at a steady 70 ish mph

[@flemmodk]

Nice video. Bjørn just saw a video from the UK testing the Ionic 5.. The vehicle are Norwegian, hope you will try it out soon.

[@vincentdelacroix]

Please do the 1000km challenge again on the Ioniq 28 !

[@ThePeterOlausson]

New 1000km test with a classic Ioniq ftw!!

[@tomvogels3565]

I hope you'll get a Lightyear One to test when it comes out, now that would be an interesting efficiency test ;)

[@ChuckJ1944]

Wow, interesting result.

[@noproblem386]

what about Fremont vs MIC SR+ battle?

[@soerenras111]

I really don’t we why people find it problematic that all other cars than Tesla shows all energy including HVAC in park on the consumption. Energi is used from the battery needs to be counted 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@GlenwingThink]

Because it is counted in the "Wh per km" counter, which should tell you the energy used to travel that number of kilometres, which doesn't include idling after the trip is over.

[@soerenras111]

@@GlenwingThink doesn’t matter. The same in a petrol car. Fuel used for idle is also counted.

[@GlenwingThink]

@@soerenras111 The information that some people are interested in is how much energy it took them to travel a certain distance. That count ends when the trip is over because time after the car is put in park is not part of the trip. Counting idle time after the trip is over makes it more inconvenient to get information about how much energy it took to travel a certain distance. That is why the people who are looking for that information find it problematic, which is the answer to your question, not an argument about which one is the "correct" way to do it.

[@ChaimLoecher]

Haha, fan or follower? Paul: "same" 😆

[@smartorder4997]

When are you going to test the Model Y range test. I am very interested, BTW do you have any HEPA Filter recommended ?

[@mario_supermd6504]

Redo 1k challenge with Ioniq would be good for to see if the efficiency king has improved over the years

[@danpaul4975]

To turn off the passenger aircon blowers, turn off "Auto", and turn off the aircon direction that blows towards you (and maybe your feet I think). If you have just the upwards fan on, it'll be driver only

[@kardy12]

The original ionic was an excellent car, but it’s a shame Hyundai didn’t do more to improve it and if anything made it worse with the larger battery that had more charging issues…

[@itsfahys]

The original Ioniq still is an Excellent Car. Ill be driving it for many more years hopefully, and id still consider the newer 38kwh model as it is still an efficient car as shown in tests by Bjorn, but obviously has slower charging. But that doesn't make hardly any difference to me, as I pretty much always charge at home.

[@kardy12]

@@itsfahys Indeed, i meant past tense as in not being on sale rather than no longer being around.

[@marianatanasov3908]

In my opinion it is matter of time, someone to do higher capacity aftermarket battery for the 1st Ioniq and if the density is better and keeps the good charging speed I think this will be game changer! Then all of us owners of the “classic” Ioniq will never change it…

[@mario_supermd6504]

FYI to turn off the passenger air vent when moving, you’d have to put it in manual (e.g. in the feet or windscreen) and then put it on auto again: then it should use only the driver unless you tap the passenger side vent.

[@yasin040190]

Yeah, give us more Ioniq content 😎👍

[@APKable]

Where's Pavel?

[@wiezyczkowata]

I thought this is Pavel, Paul is Paweł in english

[@cbromley562]

Haha, great challenge. They’re both very different cars at heart, and both very good. A test with the cars loaded for a 2 week camping trip, with two kids/teenagers arguing in the back seat, would make for an interesting, real-world challenge…to Germany and back say.;)

[@Thomas-in2wu]

I also love my old IONIQ! It simply rulez!!!

[@BareGoggen]

Great. The Ioniq28 is my next car, going from a diesel. Thanks Bjørn.

[@christopherthompson4187]

I would want to know how this competition would turn out with HVAC off for both vehicles. I drive w/o HVAC as much as possible in my M3.

[@JoakimVikberg]

Interesting to see. I love your content Björn. The Tesla seem to have better efficiency considering the weight difference. If the battery pack would've be the same size for both cars maybe the weight would be equal but the Tesla would have had better numbers since they almost reported the same numbers. What do you think?

[@alankinney6497]

Do the 1000km in the classic Ioniq again :-)

[@thrustsst]

Interesting comparison - especially since I have owned an Ioniq 28 before my current model 3 SR+ MIC. Since the experiment is about exactly the same driving distance, it might have been better to look at the total consumption in kWh per trip instead of Wh per km, which requires a counter-correction in the mileage display. In addition, Tesla uses more power at standstill than Ioniq - but that is of course a different story.

[@wasserdrucker6227]

Please next time do a "charger to charger" test, so we know the interesting energy consumption, that we pay for.

[@NicoSteinacker]

1000km in Ioniq classic. Try to beat 12hours!

[@Gonza1000]

How would this result compare to a BMW i3? I am seeing roughly the same results on my i3. My average consumption over the last 3500km is 120Wh/km, and that's from 20% citydriving (50-60km/h) 80% country roads (70-80km/h) It could be fun to add the i3 to the test? It seems to be pretty efficient when driven properly :)

[@df3555]

I cannot wait for Bjorn to get behind the wheel of the Ioniq 5 and EV6!

[@andreac7389]

The on-board computer does not necessarily represent real consumption. it's software, they can write whatever they want. The best way to see the difference in efficiency between the 2 cars is to refuel, use them for 100 / 150km together and then refuel (better in AC and look at how many kwh each single car has entered)

[@evdabbler]

I would agree with this statement. Early days on my Ioniq but I struggle to reconcile what the car displays in terms of miles per kWh and what carScanner is reading from the car in terms of total kWh consumed.

[@pigedehekkan]

Nice test but a bit unfair that Ioniq has ventilated seats. Looking forward to winter already 😆

[@bof.5715]

Good test! But what about test the Tesla 3 up against the New Ionic (38kW) (the one you ‘hate’..) I drive one for more then 53.000 km and are Happy about, do a lot of High Way kilometers in Denmark (130-140 km/t) with consumption below 180 wh/100 km👍😎

[@chrisobber5604]

I'd love to see a test where you pack the Ioniq to the point when both cars weigh the same. I find it fascinating how well the Tesla keeps up with the king despite being that heavy.

[@michelmelinot]

Let's put 280kg of stuff in the Ioniq!

[@sjoerdversteeg]

Ok, I'll send over my wife!

[@harsimranbansal5355]

@@sjoerdversteeg bruh 🤣🤣

[@MacGuyver85]

Because weight has a minimal impact on consumption, compared to all other factors. There’s about a 10% range impact for 500kg cargo at 120km/h in a Model 3. Numbers are from a known data guy (Edit: u/Wugz) on the Tesla reddit btw.

[@ellistreloar2047]

@@MacGuyver85 The force required to overcome rolling resistance equals the weight of the car multiplied by the coefficient of the rolling resistance. Therefore a heavier weight will always require more energy to move the car when the wheel size, tire pressure and road surface are the same. Every EV will have higher consumption when carrying more weight and it is more noticeable in an EV than a fossil car due to the very high efficiency of the EV in converting energy to forward movement. What your friend may be noticing is that because the EV is already very heavy, often 2 tonnes, a load of 120kg is only c. 5% extra.

[@RandomRockyCX]

Maybe ioniq's ability to use the paddles to change regen on the run and to free roll have something to say, a Ioniq driver who knows how to get the most of the car have a good advantage 👍maybe??

[@kiprasmilaknis5725]

Yes, re-do it!

[@zamarinen]

i think you should do new 1000km challenge with both 28kwh ioniq and 38kwh, and compare them both.

[@FFVoyager]

The 28kWh would win. By a lot.

[@Robcomesana]

I've always liked the ionic, and I can't stand the model 3 interior but... the Tesla is the winner of this test IMHO. It has larger battery, it's a faster and heavier car and there isn't a big difference in efficiency. Great test!

[@roosterbooster6238]

Same here.. the Tesla interior really puts me off, the price compared to the ioniq is also far higher

[@Hitman006xp]

and it will be more efficient on higher speeds. In germany 120 is nearly the lowst you can imagine on a highway XD 140-150km/h is more regular.

[@ellistreloar2047]

@@Hitman006xp All EVs are less efficient at higher speeds. Because speed is squared in the force required to overcome air resistance.

[@Hitman006xp]

@@ellistreloar2047 Sure but most EVs are lese efficient at high Speed compared to a Tesla. A Tesla on a 500km trip @150km/h needs lees kWh than most if not all other EVs currently on the market. Driving fast (140-170) with a Model 3 does not hurt that much as with other EVs.

[@ellistreloar2047]

@@Hitman006xp LoL. Elon Musk is a clever guy and Tesla’s have great technology, no doubt. But you’re suggesting they can deny the laws of physics. They cannot. These are not theories or opinions. All your journeys by bike, car, bus, train, boat and plane all depend on these laws. It’s a matter of maths and physics not Musk magic. Education is a wonderful thing. Study some here www.engineeringtoolbox.com/rolling-friction-resistance-d_1303.html

[@martonberecz3917]

Do the ioniq please!

[@tonylawton7475]

What tyres brand? Size? I've found sport tyres consume more power than eco.

[@decimal1815]

Would be interesting to measure the battery degradation on an older Ionic 28kWh. Interested to see how the battery on this car is holding up after 50,000 km or more.

[@insevanhouts]

Ohhhhh yeah I'd be an even bigger fan if you redo the ioniq 1000km challenge

[@brecherxp9795]

A classiv Ioniq with 500 PS would have been nice. 64 kwh please. Big tyres and everything is all righty.

[@Pervypriest]

That would be the E Niro 😄

[@catalicos]

Could the difference be down to FWD vs RWD? 🤔 Either way it's pretty much even

[@glennrmarks]

The difference could be in driving style because it's so close. As is the ionic should be more efficient as it is lighter. But it shows what a great job Tesla has done to make a heavier car almost as efficient. Of course, that weight adds up to more range, so you do get something extra in the Tesla.

[@tymanot]

Thanks for the Video Björn. It would be interesting to see the results after charging as it was mentioned on KZbin that Tesla bord computer shows way too less. The difference between what was actually charged and the indicated consumption by the car. Some KZbinr have reported that Tesla has a larger deviation than other manufacturers.

[@vadimus2007]

AC deactivates on passenger side, but heating does not, and I suppose heating might kick in with 21C setting and 21C outside.

[@daemigeo1]

Why in the world they didn't put a 64KWh battery on the classic Ioniq? I think Hyundai is afraid that they would not sell any Kona...

[@namanverdu]

Since they were working on the Ioniq 5 and want to sell that instead of the classic Ioniq

[@cosminduca3335]

@Paul - please instal the 64kW battery on yours :D

[@emceh]

Yes please redo 1000km chalange for ioniq

[@OenkePoenke]

Ioniq go home or rather home run for Ioniq? ;-) I wasn't sure either and I'd say they're mostly even. Weight comes into the equation not while driving constantly, but rather while accelerating and decelerating (read: recuperating), which is clearly reflected in the city test at 8:02 - 108Wh for the 280kg heavier Model 3 vs 96 Wh for the Ioniq. Also, Model 3 has wider tires (235 vs 205 I think), which seems to be compensated by the slightly better aerodynamics. EVcalc shows Cw*A = 0,53m² for the Ioniq 2016 and 0.51m² for the Model 3 LFP. Finally, it'd be great to see over all efficiency including charging at the same HPC charger. Bit tricky though (almost impossible to do it very accurately I'd say) as it's hard to charge to the exact same SOC. Overall they show to be even and I like what I see :-) (would aswell have if Model 3 was slightly better, I klicked the like button when I started the video cause I absolutely appreciate that Bjorn did the test!) And yes, another 1000km challange run would be great!

[@pericoolseby]

I have Opel Ampera E 2018 and it is also a very nice in city drive consumption. In the name of science I can help with a comparison with another car. Just let me know.

[@shockwave1xD]

Maybe you should re-test eUp 32kWh. I have one and in non-highway conditions in summer I regularly get

[@antoniocirino8444]

kWh/km

[@shockwave1xD]

@@antoniocirino8444 100km of course

[@ShoneBrate]

We should re do it!!!

[@Andreas11390]

Everyone knew that Ioniq would win 😄😎

[@jrntoregiskemo1702]

Bjørn, when will you get your hands on the Aptera? You need to try to get hold of the 100kwh Aptera and do the 1k test!

[@AB-yt4hd]

It will be boring as it won't have to recharge at all ;)

[@petrihietanen1102]

I think Aptera with 100kWh battery will crash 1000 km challenge for good. Drag coefficient Cd value of 0.12... and might finally be even lower than that.

[@aprilpatten5015]

With US SR+ buyers having a choice between The US battery and the LFP China battery, would you do a comparison video to help us understand the differences and decide which is best?

[@Brainar]

Do a new 1000km with ioniq 28kwh 🔋

[@ModPhreak]

What exact tires were on both cars, to rule out anything in that regard? This was a great same time test...

[@hemmper]

Softer rubber supposedly hurts efficiency.

[@YTcolinT]

Hi Bjorn, could you work out a "Tank to Tank" test with these two cars, how much Juice has been used in total? i.e. not ignoring battery / car heating / cooling rather than just looking at what's used to propel the car!

[@glennrmarks]

I think the wh/km is exaxtly that - all uses of power, not just the motors. Thats why having hvac on or off makes a difference.

[@evdabbler]

@@glennrmarks I would have thought this is the case but unless i am missing something i cannot get carScanner readings to match the economy indicated on my Ioniq dashboard.

[@manukahoney3442]

Hi Bjørn, I (a German resident) am driving an Ioniq 28 kWh, and consider to travel to Sweden within the next weeks. Can you recommend any (local or global) charging provider? German providers either don't support Scandinavian charging infrastructure or are rather expensive. Thanks in advance for your support!

[@raptorpome2577]

install the following app on your phone chargemap

[@manukahoney3442]

@@raptorpome2577 For what reason? It neither provides information in providers nor on rates.