hahahaha Everyone knows The Republic of China is China
@jayhi88Ай бұрын
@@RectalRooter 哈哈哈!大家都知道呆灣是屬於中國的領土。
@yoverlord340Ай бұрын
@@RectalRooter Part of China
@chenchen695Ай бұрын
你这头像也太搞笑了
@Huang-m6pАй бұрын
👍👍
@pinfu7179Ай бұрын
Worth mentioning that Nanchang was the birth place of the PLA.
@etow8034Ай бұрын
Correct, another place I need to visit Bayi Square !
@soumao233Ай бұрын
“南昌起义”。
@RichardsMiscCornerАй бұрын
it's a very clean and sleek looking ship
@ericswain70Ай бұрын
The housekeeping on the Nanchang is impressive. She looks pristine and majestic. Salute to all sailors.
@mythbusterthe6749Ай бұрын
Chinese warships are always look new and clean in appearances in comparation to navies of other nations esp. USN
@charlesburke2379Ай бұрын
The worn look is noticeable. But remember manpower is down, and US vessels patrol the far oceans of the world. Chinese naval deployments rarely breach the South China Sea. The Red fleet could gain anchorage in Mariel, Cuba or Bluefields, Nicaragua soon. So, they'll be around.
@cheungchingtongАй бұрын
Discipline.
@thomas_jayАй бұрын
Most likely because they are all new and hardly have undergone any wear and tear as the ships of most other navies.
@cheungchingtongАй бұрын
@@thomas_jay Have a look at the old ones.
@ZhaoHe-rl8mxАй бұрын
@@charlesburke2379中国只需要在太平洋击败美军就可以了,或者用核弹攻击华尔街🎉
@charttrakarn3438Ай бұрын
It is not only a beautiful ship but a combat excellent ship!
@Hellfox777Ай бұрын
What combat?
@BITStudioCodeАй бұрын
@@Hellfox777depends on how you interpret it!
@etow8034Ай бұрын
So smart in it's construction with stainless steel rails and stairs, no corrosion or painting necessary for the life of the ship !
@williamho1976Ай бұрын
Isn't this ship that has repelled an electronic attack from the Growler at the South China Sea at 2023?
@etow8034Ай бұрын
Not just repelled, but recorded the radar signature of the American electronic warfare spectrum !
@hanhuang7263Ай бұрын
@@etow8034and cutted off the radar and communication from the Growler for couple hours.
@BuconoirАй бұрын
Repelled? Lololololol
@BuconoirАй бұрын
@hanhuang7263 lolololol. You wolf warriors are too funny. Fuck Xi Xi the Pooh
@ningzhang3282Ай бұрын
@@Buconoir so you meant "expelled"? ~
@tgsgardenmaintenance4627Ай бұрын
The type 55's are very impressive ships! Been on-board a few Japanese warships , don't know if it's an Asian thing, but they were also spotlessly clean!
@DorJinTanАй бұрын
Asian thing.
@freeworld88888Ай бұрын
It is benefit that during Nancy pelosi visited Taiwan, America sent out a F18 superhornet jammer to jam the chinese warships, apparently it was the a type 0055 destroyers. But the F18 flied over and attacked a few times, it did nothing to the type 055 super destroyers radars and electronics sensors, the type 055 was open their lunchers doors, the F18 pilots were in shocked and left quickly and the America general got sacked for sent the F18 jammer out. china's sensors and radars are advanced AESA series are so powerful , its actually nearly melted the F18 eletronic system. we don't know it true or not but pla and Americans troops are talkng about it.
@Klentung8989Ай бұрын
Bullshitting
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
@Klentung8989 please try harder to rebutt unless you got nothing
@Klentung8989Ай бұрын
@Wvk5zc u have nothing, just another bullshit pile
@92HazelMochaАй бұрын
This did happen, but a little differently. Firstly, Pelosi's visit was months before the F18 incident. During the visit F18's jammed Chinese AWACs aircraft, but the PLA analyzed this interaction and developed a method to render F18 jamming ineffective. Months later an American naval officer (not a general, in the US Generals are not in the navy) ordered an F18 to jam a Type 055. Not only was it a Type 055, it was this exact ship that the video is about. However the jamming attempt failed as the F18 received a lock warning meaning that the Type 055's radar was still functional. The F18 continued to get closer (probably in an attempt to successfully jam the warship) but continued to fail, then the Nanchang opened it's weapon bay doors and the F18 turned around and went home. The Nanchang did not "nearly melt" the F18's electronics, but the officer in charge on the US side was fired and the US is now looking to quickly replace their F18 jamming systems as a result.
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
@@Klentung8989 again, hollow words from nobody like you
@killen47Ай бұрын
Great! Thank you!
@BITStudioCodeАй бұрын
The ship looks hella futuristic with that sleek hull design!! Also wondering if you could do a video on the French FDI frigate
@DISTINGUISHED.GENTLEMAN.Ай бұрын
Dear Eurasia Naval Insight, Did the Type 055 repel an electronic attack from the Growler at the South China Sea in 2023 ? If yes, could you please make a video on this incident ?
@zszs100Ай бұрын
Please talk about the growler's attempt to jam the type 055 back in Dec, and the sources that prove this. Thanks.
@MZR-r9wАй бұрын
This ship was amazing
@sl5524Ай бұрын
Is
@etow8034Ай бұрын
The first ship of the class hull number 101 is named after Nanchang City in Jiangxi province the birth place of the PLA on 1 August 1927 ! Bayi Square is second largest memorial to the PLA after the one in Tienanmen Square in Beijing ! kzbin.info/www/bejne/g4ewdoSvZaZ5rZI
@Azathoth2980Ай бұрын
This is the true definition of arsenal cruiser envisioned at late coldwar but never materialized
@nassimtahraoui628728 күн бұрын
You can talk about . Gerard class frigate ❤
@IronWolfOzАй бұрын
I am not chinese, But I just hope that one day China and Taiwan will avoid war at all costs... But then again I am not sure of what is China and Taiwan flexing at each other over for anyways? Is it over the waterway straight?
@十四弟少侠Ай бұрын
You can understand them as the two sides of the American Civil War. The mainland side is similar to the victorious northern regime, which now represents the China internationally, and the Taiwan side is similar to the defeated south, but it retreated to the island of Taiwan.
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
@@十四弟少侠 Why do you always compare the ccp to America ? ccp compares itself to America America compares itself to America
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
@@十四弟少侠 Comparing the ccp being more interested in killing other Chinese citizens than fighting Japan with America civil war. Shameful you are.
@十四弟少侠Ай бұрын
@@RectalRooter I thought you spoke English. I used this example to make it easier for you to understand. That’s all.
@十四弟少侠Ай бұрын
@@RectalRooter If I compare two divided dynasties in China, would you understand?
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
seems like they can't really show a lot inside their flagship (understandably). There is not much to see here lol
@DaddyBear205Ай бұрын
I can watch the girl instead
@sitoudien9816Ай бұрын
Which is prettier, the ship or the lady?
@xiaohung6014Ай бұрын
‘Mediocrity is not really accommodated by the Chinese language’ 😂 7:55
@nickl1177Ай бұрын
Impressive but with modern weaponry, naval targets like the US aircraft carriers are vulnerable. I hope China will allocate more resources to improving its space capabilities because it looks like the US wants to dominate the final frontier.
@angelaferkel7922Ай бұрын
Well China already has their very own domestic space station up there
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
Its no coincidence that china keep launching satellites every week. Don't you worry about it ;)
@PChan-yt4ufАй бұрын
The US may want to, but they have already lost their lead.
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
Why do you always compare the ccp to America ? ccp compares itself to America America compares itself to America
@gumpyoldbugger6944Ай бұрын
As an ex RCN member, I think I can say with all honesty, the majority of the crew of the Nanchang would quickly get sick and tired of all the rah rah bs and ship song......that's how most sailors are, no matter which navy they are in......that kind of motativational gash will probably only work on very Jr. officer who are still wet behind their ears.
@BicyclesMayUseFullLaneАй бұрын
I mean, it is literally a CCTV-7 show. Anything on it that is not physical evidence of something existing should be taken with a grain of salt.
@davidbosak7503Ай бұрын
Weird to see a museum on a warship. I guess for PR purposes and crew moral they found it necessary.
@92HazelMochaАй бұрын
Almost certainly removed when the ship is in use. The ship is entirely devoid of crew and personal equipment so I'd guess it was due for a refit or something and they decided have it used as a PR piece while it's in port.
@davidbosak7503Ай бұрын
@@92HazelMocha That would make sense. At sea, everything in this museum would end up rolling around on the deck.
@Nordy941Ай бұрын
KZbin unsubscribed me for no reason…
@roro-v3zАй бұрын
The girl is soo pretty
@crazyhorse1771Ай бұрын
You're meant to be focusing on the ship, not the girl! 😂, but I agree.
@SoCalFreelanceАй бұрын
Would love to see the CIC.
@edgarnavarro1266Ай бұрын
The lady😂😂😂
@Dunewarrior00Ай бұрын
I like how the first 2 minutes was dedicated to damage control. Wasn't there a big-name western OSINT "china expert" who claimed the ship had no damage control?
@DaddyBear205Ай бұрын
Who’s that idiot
@gelinrefiraАй бұрын
Westoids like to keep thinking that they are the only smart people in the room and everyone else is an idiot.
@samuelstanley1464Ай бұрын
🔥🔥W video
@freezonechannel8639Ай бұрын
Great ship & pretty woman reporter.
@johnnyzhao4985Ай бұрын
nice and neat
@DorJinTanАй бұрын
There be a sea dragon!
@dongately2817Ай бұрын
Wang Chung in service for 10 years
@crazyhorse1771Ай бұрын
LOL, judging by the comments, seems to be more focus on the young lady than the ship. 😂😂😂
@mburumbaappolus6728Ай бұрын
Beautiful lady (guess which one Im referring to😂)
@MSAVHMPАй бұрын
They probably don't wear shoes inside 😭
@tatendawapmawumburudze2135Ай бұрын
Awesome ass kicker
@asimjabbar8445Ай бұрын
They haven't shown anything inside apart from the bunk beds and mess hall.
@ChikiKaboomkaboomАй бұрын
Lol ofcourse they wont
@znzbest2004Ай бұрын
真TM帅
@tonyyin8524Ай бұрын
Without some updates on the Type 055 or even interesting claims or discussions by Chinese netizens "in-the-know," this video felt like a puff piece or even propaganda. Just some honest feedback, no offense intended.
@EurasiaNavalАй бұрын
No offense taken Tony. Points made. This is a fairly low effort post I will admit. In hindsight it would have been a good opportunity to include new info coming out of Chinese social media. As for propaganda, that's in the eye of the beholder.
@gelinrefiraАй бұрын
Of course it is a puff piece but so what. The entire Hollywood is a puff piece for the US military and empire and we are pretending otherwise.
@daikucoffee5316Ай бұрын
I press my F key for the poor sailor having to sing a song like a school boy.
@Hellfox777Ай бұрын
Look folks it a new shiny ship. DOES NOT mean it is a combat effective ship. From what your OTHER ships look like (003), it is going to need at least 3 years' worth of shake down cruises just to work out the bugs.
@gelinrefiraАй бұрын
The Nanchang is in service for at least 4 years.
@thomas_jayАй бұрын
Yes, the PLAN ist the bestest of the best. They virtually invented naval warfare.
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
haha funny haha
@BuconoirАй бұрын
I wonder if that thing has any Chinese made escalators on it? Those things eat people. Now, which American ship did they copy this time?
@timothychung4811Ай бұрын
?
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
Sounds like bot. No way a human speaks like that 😂
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
lol
@Valkyrie_YukikazeАй бұрын
A little bit too much decoration about speeches and inspirational saying on the interior to my liking, almost make me feels like a Chinese school or army barracks nowadays instead of a naval warship. But I suppose that’s the usual style for large enough space that do not need to be cramped up with equipment and structures LOL.
@williamcarl4200Ай бұрын
That's a pretty girl with a fine name. I would love to see a joint sail of US, Japanese and Chinese carrier task forces. In that moment, humanity would know the future is bright.
@懒王-q5tАй бұрын
如果真有那个时刻,一定是苏联复活了,而且更加强大
@imparkmade7357Ай бұрын
Sleek ship but why does the helicopter look exactly like the American helicopters
@myfamilyvideos84Ай бұрын
That is because the Z20 is based on the American Blackhawk Helicopter. In the 1980’s when US and China was on friendly terms, US sold Blackhawk Helicopters to China, but after the 1989 Tiananmen Square incident, the sale was stopped. Chinese maintained and serviced these helicopters and also reversed engineered these and made it their own, hence why they look very similar.
@tvgerbil1984Ай бұрын
@@myfamilyvideos84 Their WZ-10 turboshaft engines on these Harbin Z20s are a lot more powerful than the General Electric T700-GE-401C turboshaft engines on the Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawks. The improvement of aeronautical performance over the original Sikorsky design is substantial.
@myfamilyvideos84Ай бұрын
@ Definitely, the Z20 has better speed, higher flight ceiling and higher payload. 5 blade vs the 4 blade design of the Black Hawk/Sea Hawk.
@taiwanstillisntacountryАй бұрын
Chinese helicopters actually fly.
@RectalRooterАй бұрын
Everybody knows that fish and birds look exactly the same because the both live in the Milky way galaxy. STOP STOP STOP SAYING THE CCP COPIES EVERYTHING !!!!
@lars4953Ай бұрын
Never drink coffee. It's a drug...
@boxtearsАй бұрын
Why does China refuse to call this a cruiser?
@PaiSAMSENАй бұрын
The term simply doesn't existed in PLAN classification system. Principle combat ship either focus on local-level threat (Frigate), or focus on theater-level threat (Destroyer).
@xinyiquan666Ай бұрын
u should go ask japan why their helicopter carrier as a frigate
@Wvk5zcАй бұрын
not everything has to follow western protocol
@boxtearsАй бұрын
@@Wvk5zc The terms destroyer and frigate are both western in origin.
@khaledselim8130Ай бұрын
@@boxtears not about Western or Eastern about Chinese navy PLAN classification system, which doesn't have a "cruiser" in it (or Corvette also) just destroyers & frigates
@佯谬Ай бұрын
过于落后 可以出口😂
@user-7474mkАй бұрын
055還沒有說出口😂
@625as-pj5mgАй бұрын
@@user-7474mk 052D都没人买的起
@懒王-q5tАй бұрын
@@user-7474mk 如果是中东的王爷们想要,价钱可以商量
@doglover2343Ай бұрын
China is so obsessed with copying US military machines like helicopters it's like they worship the US military !!😂😂
@Breath300 lol what a m0r0n!! the tejas is a 1st generation trainer and you want to say that this destroyer is a copy of a plane??? what an idi0t!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣