armored car looks more soviet than nazi with all the round edges and greenish camo.
@12isaac004 жыл бұрын
and the whole "no gun depression" thing
@PanzerEdelweissStevenDelMar5554 жыл бұрын
It even looks like it came out from the Fallout 4
@bryanmartinez66004 жыл бұрын
@@12isaac00 well no gun depression was also kinda common on German tanks like Panther, Tiger, King Tiger, Ferdinand, Stug, Hetzer, and a bunch of others. British and Americans had better gun depression and the Sherman was pretty good depending on what gun was mounted. The Firefly also didn't have such great gun depression as the gun internally took up a bunch of room.
@PanzerEdelweissStevenDelMar5554 жыл бұрын
@@bryanmartinez6600 I heardRussian tanks were almost the same as well
@bryanmartinez66004 жыл бұрын
@@PanzerEdelweissStevenDelMar555 lol definitely you ain't gonna shoot over a hill in a t72 hull down.
@Demospammer99874 жыл бұрын
"The gun looks too big for this kind of tank" Nah they just put it in sideways.
@imanin99723 жыл бұрын
lmao
@anm10wolvorinenotapanther323 жыл бұрын
I see you're a Potential History fan aswell
@Demospammer99873 жыл бұрын
@@anm10wolvorinenotapanther32 meme's been around longer than that, but yeah his content is pretty good
@ghilliem.g.58242 жыл бұрын
the gun on the VC wasen't sideways so it could fit, it was sideways so the loader had an easier time loading it, the actuall thing the brits did to fit the 17pndr on the sherman was to remove the radio, but it in a box on the outside and carve a hole for the crew to operate it from the inside, because all they needed was *extra* space, because the gun *could* fit in the turret, the only problem was that the recoil would hit the back of it
@mrwehraboo54784 жыл бұрын
I never knew that wolfenstein had tanks
@CaptainAwesome-mz6mt4 жыл бұрын
But in Wolfenstien they have flying gunships and carriers
@TheArklyte4 жыл бұрын
Well, we all knew they had them, we just never noticed them and expected them to be more then a background info. And that's only in regards to new series. Even 2009's game had Tiger and... well, let's call it a SturmMaus.
@CaptainAwesome-mz6mt4 жыл бұрын
@@TheArklyte I remember in the video just before when the narrator was talking about the Sherman and went to a clip, with BJ on the Massive wheel cycle, driving past the old U.S Army equipment, they were all standard from the war, but the trucks, jeeps and the tanks have been so heavily modified to keep up with the German war machine until they finally lost.
@Kez_DXX4 жыл бұрын
The Shermans only show up in passing. Literally. There are lines of them and other US Army vehicles abandoned along a rural Texas road in a cutscene in The New Colossus. The photo for the nuclear powered nazi tank is part of a letter you can find as a collactable in The New Order.
@sethleoric25984 жыл бұрын
Yeah thought the Nazees would just go full mecha
@snipsoe4 жыл бұрын
KZbins favorite symbol 0:14
@Joaosantos221144 жыл бұрын
*KZbin* "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee".
@thomas.024 жыл бұрын
demonetized!
@aussieman47914 жыл бұрын
:shook:
@jarskil88624 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, Finnish modern Airforce symbol
@WollongongWacko4 жыл бұрын
*N*
@spyrelle39704 жыл бұрын
The Armored Car isn't designed to be any 'kinda "troop transporter". Judging by the way it launches drones out it's hatch in The New Order, I'm convinced it's primarily for that purpose over all-else, a drone-deployment platform. (Also although they aren't used in-game, there's hatches across the front body I imagine the drivers could look out of.)
@Galdenberry_Lamphuck4 жыл бұрын
Its heavily armored and is packing giant cannons dude. Not cost effective as just a drone deployer
@ognoders4 жыл бұрын
@@Galdenberry_Lamphuck lol nothing they use is cost effective its all go big or go home xD
@adamjames11494 жыл бұрын
Alackofcaring This is a WW2-era Nazi German military. Cost efficiency was a foreign concept to them.
@ognoders4 жыл бұрын
@@adamjames1149 *Cold War Era* majority of the game takes places in the 60's +
@spyrelle39704 жыл бұрын
@@Galdenberry_Lamphuck I imagine the "London Monitor" isn't cost-effective either.
@zafranorbian7574 жыл бұрын
With the poll a Valkyria Chronicles tank discussion seems unlikeley, but I am andamant that those are some interesting tanks to talk about. They are pretty good at resembling functional tanks. Anyway that fake Puma looks more like it has atleast double 5cm guns based on how large that entire vehicle is.
@koverpy4264 жыл бұрын
The pinnacle of exposed engine (radiator) at rear.
@BaDArxz4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I honestly have to agree on that. Though all the vehicles have one obvious con and that’s the exposed engine on the back of the tanks
@Joaosantos221144 жыл бұрын
Radiators are pratically impervious to small arms fire, it would be interesting to note that as the germans had issues on the eastern front with their rear armor against soviet anti-tank rifles, the same would potentially apply to valkyria in terms of radiator exposure.
@CptJack-ws8nz4 жыл бұрын
I would love to see Spookston do a episode about Valkyria Chronicles tanks
@leonardodibartolomeo77384 жыл бұрын
I bought valkyria only because I read some comment under the fallout video, but man, am I loving that game!
@WetWiIIy4 жыл бұрын
No comment about the random superfluous machine guns bolted around the future-Sherman?
@rhodanjones51554 жыл бұрын
Its not historicaly innacurate just look at all the early war american tanks, just look at the early stuarts that had up to 4 machine guns on a man tank.
@aussieman47914 жыл бұрын
Imma guess, it was just there to add extra firepower to support infantry, definitely not useful but yeah idk
@Brapir4 жыл бұрын
@@aussieman4791 Maybe, but you can see some upgraded shermans like the sherman revalorisé and the sherman repotenciado. They aren't too flashy.
@edwardzero92754 жыл бұрын
Americans were in the cult of the machine gun at the time, not the most ridiculous thing. Not to mention it can prove still useful if supporting infantry
@Mr-Trox4 жыл бұрын
The very first M4 Shermans had two machineguns bolted into the hull that the driver could fire on top of the hull gun, the .30 coax, and the. 50 roof gun.
@WeegeeSlayer1234 жыл бұрын
4:18 That thing BJ is driving looks like one of Jimmy's vehicles from Jimmy Neutron.
@Rrgr54 жыл бұрын
It actually exists, believe it or not and it was made in Italy in the 30's.
@Rrgr54 жыл бұрын
@один день мама monowheel, yep, stupid name, but it isn't very practical anyway, some people did reproduce it nowdays, but still kind odd and unpractical.
@deathtrooper1994 жыл бұрын
@@Rrgr5 An revolutionary joy ride I suppose
@theprepaintedcanvis34524 жыл бұрын
It was in borderlands 3 too.
@beanhead50374 жыл бұрын
No one going to talk about how general grevious rode one of these
@DS-xy7bu4 жыл бұрын
3:24 Imaging chilling in an out post in Syria and that just rolls up
@Knallteute4 жыл бұрын
Isn't even that impossible. In the 6day war the Israelis used Panter IV and some of them might get back on the battlefield und a ISIS command. And they would build such a contraption.
@user-do5zk6jh1k4 жыл бұрын
I'd see if a mobility kill were possible, because an antique like that should be preserved.
@reckyourself69484 жыл бұрын
Imagine how it feels to grease a dude and pick up an STG 44 from his corpse. Modern warfare is an amazing thing.
@kirra91524 жыл бұрын
That?. aww cmon. Not very dreadfull considering lots of rpg and ied nowdays.
@domchubs58364 жыл бұрын
5:27 That looks a hell of a lot bigger than a 90mm... maybe they mounted a howitzer gun onto the turret or made a long barreled variant of the 105mm gun that the U.S. already had.
@codenamehalo98474 жыл бұрын
Dom Chubs yeah, the US did add a 105mm on their Sherman's at some point but they also made the turret bigger so the crew could still have space, this one just looks like the regular Sherman turret with more curves
@domchubs58364 жыл бұрын
@Drunk Pharaoh The allies didn't have that on their tanks, they only had the short barreled 105mm howitzer. I'm saying either the germans added their own full length howitzer gun onto the turret or made a long variant of the american 105mm.
@domchubs58364 жыл бұрын
@Drunk Pharaoh Right, I thought the upgraded sherman was upgraded by the germans
@rhodanjones51554 жыл бұрын
No a 105mm would require a much bigger turret mantle e.g the abrams and unless your talking about artillery, the americanos did not have a long barreled 105 on a tank just a short barreled one
@domchubs58364 жыл бұрын
So is this modified sherman made by the U.S. or the germans after they captured it?
@asherc.41204 жыл бұрын
Spookston: *says if a nuclear reactor were to explode, it'd be a steam explosion* Me: HOW DOES AN RBMK REACTOR EXPLODE
@sesostrisiii23004 жыл бұрын
He is delusional, take him to the infirmary
@oldleatherhandsfriends40534 жыл бұрын
I was in the tioilet.
@phantomsoldier4974 жыл бұрын
Chernobyl was actually a steam explosion. There would be no nuclear explosion in a reactor since there isn't enough fissile material for it
@D8W2P44 жыл бұрын
@@phantomsoldier497 Also the wrong type to do that.
@asherc.41204 жыл бұрын
@@phantomsoldier497 I knew it was a steam explosion. And it's still an explosion
@zombygaming88314 жыл бұрын
Hitler liked big things. The Car's size is historically accurate to what Hitler thought was best. To him, bigger is always better.
@zombygaming88314 жыл бұрын
@Pot Committed I guess I am.
@cobaltCarnivore4 жыл бұрын
Pot Committed *Fuhrerious*
@zombygaming88314 жыл бұрын
@@cobaltCarnivore 😆
@connormclernon264 жыл бұрын
Zomby Gaming so basically, he was compensating for something?
@rhodanjones51554 жыл бұрын
I dont know where you heard this but hitler had no role in the design and production of any of the wermacht equipment.
@Romanov1174 жыл бұрын
Removing the unity sight from the Sherman is the biggest crime in the best Tank designs I've ever seen. Any Tankers need those in case you don't wanna have a cupola with only Vision ports but without Periscopes will results having blind sights.
@WolffenBreon4 жыл бұрын
0:48 Just imagine this giant ten wheeled monster rolling up, with two big ass guns at the front and thinking you're gonna be in for one hell of a fight. Only for one little laser drone to pop out of it and... That's it...
@justin7644 жыл бұрын
We might be just watching this video going “interesting designs”, but in other universe some of us might be watching this video while thinking “that’s how we disable enemy vehicles”
@nerdynautilus53734 жыл бұрын
Planetside 2 tanks please, you can even have three episodes for each of the three factions
@hedgehog31804 жыл бұрын
I mean there are only 4 different tanks in total though.
@sethleoric25984 жыл бұрын
Damn scythes
@shocktrooper26224 жыл бұрын
There was a infantry telephone field mod in use by 44, though the improved ones didn't come around until Korea
@devinbrooks39304 жыл бұрын
Do the Halo Elephant from Halo wars and Halo 3, and maybe the mammoth from Halo 4
@alejandroosorio78654 жыл бұрын
You should talk about the Gears of War Centaur Tank
@mrfreezeable29304 жыл бұрын
@@diegomoreno7760 technically it's a light tank
@tigersympathiser22654 жыл бұрын
@@diegomoreno7760 I guess the puma, centauro and amx 10 don't count
@CrazyDutchguys4 жыл бұрын
@@tigersympathiser2265 none of those are designated as a tank
@CheemsofRegret4 жыл бұрын
You should check out some of the ""tanks"" in Star Wars. They'll really get your gears grinding.
@batingbaton45884 жыл бұрын
M241a260 IP 176mm smooth bore hvvs shermbrams 4:20
@hugos51144 жыл бұрын
i think the double sprocket on the german (those geared wheels) that you said "connected to nothing" actually work that way: the forward one is connected to the transmission, while the aft one is connected to the tracks, as it seems that they aren't in line with the hull.
@Gracz874 жыл бұрын
3:10 - I think this base on Pzkfpw IV photo - 8 road wheels, instead of 6 in Panzer III (most popular versions).
@gunnmancreations54374 жыл бұрын
I love your, "everything wrong with" videos, they are always very interesting.
@tigersympathiser22654 жыл бұрын
Star wars AAT? I'm enjoying this series and would love to see the droid hind based tank covered.
@randomuser54434 жыл бұрын
The armored car looks like it had major hydroforming, like the Soviets.
@devan91894 жыл бұрын
I love your use of rain for the outro, hits me with nostalgia everytime
@honeybadger67554 жыл бұрын
Spookston has grown so much and I honestly would love more videos such as this I can't wait to see what he has in the future
@unsc20604 жыл бұрын
Love that Halo 3's "Behold a Pale Horse" is playing in the background.
@10pt164 жыл бұрын
They did cram a 105mm gun into the standard Sherman turret. So if they worked around shortening the 90mm cannon m3 they could probably fit it nicely.
@Spookston4 жыл бұрын
The 105 M4 was a self propelled artillery vehicle, so they probably didn't care if it produced ergonomic issues.
@10pt164 жыл бұрын
@@Spookston it could pen a panther with HEAT shell the 105mm. At least according to field accounts and war thunder. So i really question why not just make the howitzer sherman. More he filler than a 75mm. Yes lower velocity but still a higher pen.
@cldus74424 жыл бұрын
@@10pt16 thing is, with an artillery vehicle the crew does not need to be comfortable. They just load the gun, fire it and go about their day out of direct enemy fire. In combat, however, a severely stressed out crew will not be too happy with the lack of space inside the vehicle. The biggest limitation to fitting an oversized gun into a tank is crew space inside
@10pt164 жыл бұрын
@@cldus7442 with 105mm mounted sherman the breach was smaller than the 75mm's actually. The shells were larger but the breach wasnt as long and had a tighter block that didn't hinder as much space as the 75mm m3 guns did. Unless war thunder which did research on the vehicles is lying the 105mm would've been even more comfortable than the 75mm for the crew
@thomashill13404 жыл бұрын
I'm really loving your videos man! You have a great voice that works especially well with this, in my opinion.
@sr.lontra4 жыл бұрын
This series is pretty great Keep it up, man
@ThommyofThenn4 жыл бұрын
Suggestion: Everything wrong with vehicles from Metal Arms: Glitch in the System. that game has the craziest most amazing vehicles
@GhoulGamer-yi7iq4 жыл бұрын
This mans pfp is “wolf”instine
@thepie1934 жыл бұрын
*shittyflute curb your enthusiasm*
@elijahjay2134 жыл бұрын
Hey! Firstly awesome work on this video! Good points on all of it, but if I may suggest, I think the armored car more closely resembles the more obscure Sd.Kfz 231 8 rad. The angles, frontal additions, raised turret, and wheel housings resemble it more. I know they're both very closely related however, and it's also quite pretentious to point out something minute on such an old video about a fictional vehicle, but hey thought I'd offer that take. Regardless keep up the great work! Your vids are always entertaining!
@dakkahead5174 жыл бұрын
4:53 the grunt phone was used in the pacific theater as early as...the battle for Bougainville...(i think) but definitely before the retaking of the Philippines. Im not sure when grunt phones were introduced into the ETO, but i imagine it came along as upgraded shermans started arriving in theater.
@hedgehog31804 жыл бұрын
Infantry telephone began being mounted almost as soon as they'd gotten off the beach in Normandy but they weren't part of the Sherman design, they were always just field modifications. I think that's what he means that they weren't officially part of the design.
@haloplaya20094 жыл бұрын
Just to improve on the accessibility of the less engineering side of youtube-adding highlights or circles to the parts on the tank that you’re referring to would help us understand what you’re talking about. Just a thought.
@arandomhalodude6344 жыл бұрын
*takes one look at the sherman* “Look at how they massacred my boy”
@f18_lovermacdonald-doaglau694 жыл бұрын
This is definitely my favourite tank/ land vehicles/ weapons Chanel!
@nathanscheller51734 жыл бұрын
Another great video! Keep it comin!!!
@SuspiciouslyGroomedPegasus4 жыл бұрын
Honestly I don't think much is wrong with command and Conquers vehicle desighns
@youmukonpaku31684 жыл бұрын
Depends on which C&C, some of the vehicles are frankly ridiculous (all of Renegade Nod, most of Tiberian Sun, the Apocalypse Tank, the C&C3 Scorpion) but others are just real world armored vehicles or extrapolations of them.
@ANDREALEONE954 жыл бұрын
The low level tanks seem reasonable, but higher level ones are less.
@fleshangel4894 жыл бұрын
There is nothing wrong with no vehicles of any series, they are just made up, no need to be realistic, this youtuber is just saying crap.
@ulforcemegamon30943 жыл бұрын
@@fleshangel489 well , that depends if the Game intend them to be realistic or if it doesn't tho
@marrvynswillames49754 жыл бұрын
Didnt relember that Second tank. But, it was been over a year since i played
@M4A3Sherman4 жыл бұрын
I did some research on tanks and did find stuff about the infantry telephone. The US did use it in WWII in Western Europe in 1944. However, some units found it to be ineffective and that having the commander on foot with the infantry to be a better way to communicate. Great Video by the way.
@brandonwelsh50904 жыл бұрын
The vertical doors on the armored car is for the drone bay, I'm not sure where on the vehicle troops are meant to deploy out of
@alnoso4 жыл бұрын
i honestly don't think they are supposed to deploy out of anywhere, since it doesn't even look like an APC, and the puma wasn't an APC people get in/out through the top of the turret or whatever
@dylanjohnson16954 жыл бұрын
I would love to know what you think of the warhammer 40k tanks
@sunnydaycavalry37644 жыл бұрын
As soon as I voted *BOOP* Spookston has a new video ,WOW!, THAT WAS FAST!
@mbr57423 жыл бұрын
Top exit and no shooting ports fit nicely. The Kätzchen APC concept and the pist war HS-30 both used them. The rear door om M3 and 251 where also not the main exit for fast exit. Modern designs with firing port etc. are BMP1 and past mostly
@_ArsNova4 жыл бұрын
Excellent choice of BGM, love me some Halo 3 music.
@hansgrosse95053 жыл бұрын
The whole thing with wolfenstein is that the vehicles (and enemies) are meant to be intimidating. For example The London Monitor (or Baltisches Auge) cost effective, not at all, would it make me scared to all hell if I saw that thing coming at me, very much so.
@Am_Yeff3 жыл бұрын
Very true, the nazi vehicles are all bulky and absolutely gigantic, meanwhile the, for example, updated sherman, is just an upgraded tank because it's meant to be effective
@hansgrosse95053 жыл бұрын
@@Am_Yeff it kind of makes sense aswell, why waste troops when you can end the battle before it even began
@Am_Yeff3 жыл бұрын
@@hansgrosse9505 yeah, they literally control the whole world, only thing that matters to them is if it looks cool or intimidating
@hansgrosse95053 жыл бұрын
@@Am_Yeff Seenig as they control most of the world, they probably dont have to worry about efficiency as much as if they were a smaller nation
@Demicleas2 жыл бұрын
Honestly I'm surprised the rebels don't countine to use old allied equipment considering it's just as good if not better then alot of the cold war Nazi equipment.
@impguardwarhamer4 жыл бұрын
damn you could make a whole series on warhammer tanks there's not just 1 or 2
@shadzep27014 жыл бұрын
Theres also the very tall troop carriers that can be found in the new york level
@alnoso4 жыл бұрын
a point could be made about the sherman's riveted turret being additional armor on top of the original sherman turret if it were to be built on top of a normal sherman, like what happened with multiple vehicles during WW2 (riveted armor on top of welded for captured/obsolete vehicles)
@CharliMorganMusic4 жыл бұрын
"Portholes so the men can shoot out." I think having portholes for IFVs is a stupid idea. Like, it already has a cannon. Why in the fuck anyone would want to make the cargo they're supposed to protect more vulnerable is beyond me.
@Gloria-victrix998572 жыл бұрын
Actually, Swedish IFV (CV90) has hatches that the Swedish troops often shoot out off, and they are not alone in this either since they have Tank support and other supporting Elements, the Germans did this in Ww2 as well, where Panzergrenadiers would shoot out of their Half-tracks, so there is the basis for it historically and in the modern-day with the Swedish forces. During Operation Desert Storm the M2 Bradley also has 6 firing ports. I'm not saying the M2s firing ports were really good, but, there is a basis for it in reality. But given the setting of Wolfenstein, I don't think the developers were aiming for realism here. Ironically, the firing ports were most useful in the M3 Cavalry variant of the Bradley, which reduces the number of passengers down to two soldiers acting as dismounted scouts, facing the rear doors and using the rear-firing ports; the rest of the compartment was delegated to storing additional ordnance like TOW missiles and 25mm shells. This removal of the original six passengers meant the internal space was reconfigured to allow for both more carrying capacity as well as redesigning the seats. As for the firing ports’ usefulness, the only useful role was for suppression, since precision fire was not possible within the confines of a moving vehicle nor would the periscopes and lack of weapon sights allowed for it; the magazine size also meant you might as well use the main gun or dismount and trust your luck with your actual rifle. It should be noted that firing ports were used in the contemporary Marder and BMP-1 designs, and it is not surprising that, given that these two vehicles fell away from firing port use, the Bradley did as well. The tactical doctrine made the use of firing small arms within a large armed moving vehicle made little contribution. They still have M231s stowed in Bradleys, though.
@Gloria-victrix998572 жыл бұрын
Firing ports also don't have to be very big either, just big enough to fire a rifle's barrel out of. Like in the M2 Bradley. So in reality it does not affect the survivability of the vehicle by much.
@Gloria-victrix998572 жыл бұрын
Firing ports can be closed and opened at will. I am not fighting you or anything, I'm just sharing my own thoughts, sorry if I somehow disturb you.
@shouldntreallybehere694 жыл бұрын
Can you do the Valkyria Chronicles or Warhammer 40k tanks?
@VaciliNikoMavich4 жыл бұрын
Thats what the wolf tank looked like?! Coincidentally, I was picturing a beefed up sloped nuclear tank version.
@slavcity4064 жыл бұрын
Went through the comments and nobody appreciates the nostalgic Halo 3 ODST music at the end. Wast expecting childhood memories and flash backs at the end of this but thanks :)
@kristijan994 жыл бұрын
return to castle wolfenstein was the best wolfenstein we need a remake for our childhood
@americanpride93404 жыл бұрын
I wonder what Hans was thinking when he designed the armor car
@spyrelle39704 жыл бұрын
"Please don't kill me/my family."
@stylesrj4 жыл бұрын
He was thinking about mounts for the flammenwerfer?
@Hotspur373 жыл бұрын
The gun barrel is an Oddball modificaiton he came up with the idea of putting a tube over the standard gun barrell on his shermans to make it look like they had a much larger gun
@TEGRULZ3 жыл бұрын
Actually interesting trivia, we started being able to put plug-ins to talk to Tank crews in mid 1944, due to the issues we encountered in the Hedgerow country in Normandy. So it looks different, but it's accurate. The 90 mm guns were definitely accurate too, they shoehorned a 105 mm long barreled gun into a similar looking turret in the legendary Super Shermans that Israel used.
@DoomDutch4 жыл бұрын
Had personally really hoped for C&C
@Asdtable4 жыл бұрын
But wait the real question, GDI or NOD
@DoomDutch4 жыл бұрын
@@Asdtable Why not both?
@Asdtable4 жыл бұрын
@@DoomDutch like your thinking kid. Kane wants you to view this
@Asdtable4 жыл бұрын
/googlesearch.openra
@glacier42864 жыл бұрын
Would love to see you have a go at C&C tanks. Especially the ones of Kane's Wrath and C&C4
@vovin81324 жыл бұрын
Everybody knows that the RA2 Apocalypse Tank is the greatest tank ever
@kirra91524 жыл бұрын
@@vovin8132 more like battlefortress to me.
@Asdtable4 жыл бұрын
@@kirra9152 tib sun stealth tank
@kirra91524 жыл бұрын
@@Asdtable yeah. Base infiltration was never been soo good. But it will lose against distruptor on 1 to 1 basis.
@endlesnights38174 жыл бұрын
With the way those wheel wheels are separated, and with the additional armoured skid plate is set up on the nose I think that looks more akin to the chassis of the Sd.Kfz 231 rather than the 234.
@drakonna62814 жыл бұрын
command and conquer would be fantastic, scorpion, mammoth, stealth tank so many options i hope you cover it in the future eventually
@PrinceSheogorath4 жыл бұрын
“How does 90 millimeters of tungsten strike ya”
@stylesrj4 жыл бұрын
Tank beats Ghost!
@gabrielgarcia98224 жыл бұрын
Tank beats Hunter!
@PrinceSheogorath4 жыл бұрын
Gabriel Garcia tank beats... EVERYTHING
@stylesrj4 жыл бұрын
Aww man! I could do this all day!
@gabrielgarcia98224 жыл бұрын
We forgot tank beats phantom and tank beats tank...
@redimperator25274 жыл бұрын
warhammer next
@savage78824 жыл бұрын
The video is gonna be like a half hour long addressing the flaws lmao
@theovoldjopus42724 жыл бұрын
@@savage7882 Leman Russ is too high, has a fixed suspension, it's threads are a bit thin and that's about it. They look fucking rad tho, can go on literally any fuel, have a diverse range of primary and support weapons, as the main tank of the galaxy-spanning empire should. The others are chonky and great, except for Malcadors, because they are outdated and plain hideous
@savage78824 жыл бұрын
@@theovoldjopus4272 The leman russ is actually one of the most horrible designs though. First of, its lower body is a 100% carbon copy of the first british tank in ww1, which had major issues with its armor and tracks. The russ's tracks are completely exposed meaning even an indirect hit can cripple the entire vehicle. It has barebones armor design and it slopes only on certain parts, meaning projectiles can penetrate it easilly, especially from the sides. Its cannon is completely off the center of mass and too big for it, meaning it would topple if it fired at an off angle or while moving. And its profile is massive to begin with, target practice for aircraft . Plus, crewing this thing would be a nightmare, it has four turrets and a very small space. Talking realistically of course. Warhammer has enough fluff to justify a few of what i wrote.
@theovoldjopus42724 жыл бұрын
@@savage7882 Leman Russ is far from Mark 1. The first World War tanks had huge problems mainly because they were the first, and people couldn't really figure out how to make them and, most importantly, did not have the technology to allow for such machines to function properly. LRBT's tracks are usually protected at the top, and in case of urban fighting, usually also front-protected by the doser blades to clean the roads for infantry, Chimeras and other vehicles, should they follow. images.app.goo.gl/hQaz9LeUuTgKmZmTA Its front armor is sloped at a good angle, about 50° for both top and bottom parts. Side armor is a massive weakspot, but is necessary to fit additional sponsons, and even it is not easily penetrated, as it has a moderate thickness of plasteel behind it. It's cannon actually is surprisingly low-caliber, the standard one being 120mm. The thickness of the barrel comes from cooling systems and compensators, because the rounds use much more powerful fuceline as a chemical propellant. And even crewing it isn't that hard of a deal, because it has a crew of 4 men, or 6 with sponsons, but their places are not fully located inside of the hull and are installed with sponsons if necessary. They all are located in a tank the size of a Tiger, but taller, whilst actually being lighter, so it isn't that much of a target. Yeah, kind of cramped, but at the same time it's less than the crew of Tiger itself. Also, lascannon or heavy bolter installed in the front isn't actually a turret, but rather is more like hull-mounted MG, controlled indirectly by commander, driver or even main gunner if needed.
@theovoldjopus42724 жыл бұрын
@@savage7882 I mean, the design is still really impractical, due to it being unchanged since like 1987, but it is not the levels of impracticality some people think it is. It would be cool, if Games Workshop could redesign it, but it most likely won't happen
@gabenewell39554 жыл бұрын
Loving that halo music in the background
@wrenchtheroo65574 жыл бұрын
I have to guess that the double idler at the back would mean it would be powered too? It makes no sense from where it is located but the pattern on the bigger one looks like a planetary drive wich is used to increase the torque output. Also maybe thats why there are suspension element on the too roller as a mean of adjusting the track tension
@FrostyFoxDrake4 жыл бұрын
“Their vehicles are mainly mangled versions of ones that existed during WWII with random stuff added onto them.” *glares at the M1 Abrams*
@CatsAreAmazing81874 жыл бұрын
What about make a video about everything wrong with Halo’s vehicles
@friendlyneighborhoodgalil18594 жыл бұрын
Would love to see you cover some just cause 4 tanks
@jx61354 жыл бұрын
Actually the telephone on the back of Sherman's started appearing in the Pacific theater during ww2
@derptank33084 жыл бұрын
*Laughs
@ChaS4m4 жыл бұрын
Him: “the 90mm seems too big for the turret” Me: “they put 105mm in the tank in WW2 tho…”
@Spookston4 жыл бұрын
The shell of the 90mm is much longer. It's about length, not width. The 105 was a howitzer, so it didn't need a lot of propellent and it didn't need to have a quick reload time.
@Annozocker154 жыл бұрын
@@Spookston What about the Israeli Sherman M-51? Proper 105mm. Sure those have the bigger turret of the 76mm shermans but that doesn't mean that you can't fit a 90mm into the wolfenstein sherman turret with some creativity.
@Spookston4 жыл бұрын
@@Annozocker15 Those don't have the 76mm turret, those have a specially constructed and modified French turret.
@Wotplaya44 жыл бұрын
@@Annozocker15 It's not the question whether you can fit it, but if you can make it ergonomically fit well enough, no use in a gun that takes up all of the turret space. The 75 turrets were already stretching their limits with the 17pdr, so i doubt a 90mm could fit in nicely. But hey, the barrel might just be for guiding rockets, nobody talked about what it fired...
@Annozocker154 жыл бұрын
@@Spookston No they used the standard T23 Turrets of the 76mm shermans and the gun was the modified french 105mm modelé f1 from the amx30 which was shortened to 44 caliber lengths instead of 56.
@mathieuedde14654 жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to put in a poll for a tank review of Red Faction Guerilla
@xenomorph91144 жыл бұрын
The armored car turret looks like an IS with double cannon from WoT.
@GiskardRevenlov4 жыл бұрын
40k next?
@pittraider12214 жыл бұрын
Do wh40k next!
@MBkufel4 жыл бұрын
You should also notice that the Sherman's hull was a small-hatch, cast one. It means it was pretty early and primitive
@cheezball03402 жыл бұрын
2:45 the door is not actually for troops, i played that sequence of wolfenstein myself and the APC or however you might call it actually releases multiple drones from that hatch, that attack the player
@pk-zi7lm4 жыл бұрын
has this guy ever designed a tank? he’s very knowledgeable about them, i’m sure his would be S tier
@oldleatherhandsfriends40534 жыл бұрын
@@TonyBustaroni The hardest part about designing a tank is making it transportable by air.
@charlesturner8974 жыл бұрын
"the guns look 15 to 20mm" *Shows guns that are clearly 50 to 76mm*
@Damian-03x34 жыл бұрын
Probably 50mm. Maybe 75mm. But I highly doubt that germany would use 76mm cannons.
@addinix173 жыл бұрын
Spookston sounds just so done
@SShari-bs2kx4 жыл бұрын
also about the armored car it seem the tyres is covered with steel cover that could prevent the tyre from turning in a maneuver
@longlostpotato._.27684 жыл бұрын
This video seemed cool, until I realized a furry made it.
@autisticpain19604 жыл бұрын
And how does that effect the video?
@autisticpain19604 жыл бұрын
@Alexander Wellen ahh ok
@thegoodaussie19683 жыл бұрын
the allies (U.S, British and commonwealth) used infantry telephone in the pacific war with the brits, aussies and kiwis been among the first to mount them on the rear turret or the rear of the hull.
@saintmichaelsarchangel26444 жыл бұрын
The armored personnel carrier is modeled after the German Sd.Kfz.234/2 armored car used by panzerjäger and sturmtroopen units
@johnny-vb8ue4 жыл бұрын
Nice choice of music
@macmccartney57604 жыл бұрын
Check out the leclair mbt. It doesnt have bulge on barrel for fume extractor. Uses different extraction method
@Radzaification4 жыл бұрын
That rangefinder looks like it is modeled directly from the Co queror's commanders turret/rangefinder setup
@Alte.Kameraden4 жыл бұрын
Should really do a video like this on Valkyria Chronicles 1 & 4's tank designs. They're surprisingly good, but mostly because they're based off real tanks but with some flare. VC 4's main tank the Hofen is basically a M4 Sherman, as you progress and upgrade it, it turns pretty much into a M4A3E8 but with extra armor plating welded on. VC 1's main tank eventually turns into a Tiger II with a shorter barrel gun.
@harleyinglis53603 жыл бұрын
The rivits on the Upgraded sherman might be more of a repair to the armor then a modification. welding thicker metals together can be a issue, and welding cast required the cast peice to all be hot.
@mrwehraboo54784 жыл бұрын
Spookston you also forgot that the first tank is also based of the sd.kfz.232 8-rad
@saintmichaelsarchangel26444 жыл бұрын
With the, APC it might have a mechanical leaver to open the assault hatch as a fail safe
@TheWhoamaters4 жыл бұрын
I'd say a big con for the sherman is that the new machine guns beside the turret would probably block the turret from traversing more than say 40 degrees total
@andenbrown224 жыл бұрын
infantry phones were first implemented in WW2 with the US at least. I think they started doing in in June 44 with the battle of Normandy
@Normalguy16904 жыл бұрын
That ODST music tho god u gotta go give me flashbacks.
@ne3333t4 жыл бұрын
I love that you use halo music
@terrorbilly33674 жыл бұрын
glad to see more wolfenstein out there
@MrMarinus184 жыл бұрын
One I would like is Valkyria chronicles. The tanks overall look pretty normal but one strange thing is that the MBT's are two man even though they are slightly larger than a Sherman.