Cruella: *asks specific questions about her dogs hair and jokes about wearing her dogs* Anita: seems legit🙂
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs ..
@bread.that.is.threatening3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs ...
@marijamarcelic31493 жыл бұрын
Why are u kids promoting yourselfs, theres other ways to get famous idiots Edit:holy crap i knew that matpats popular but 51likes,i just wanna thank yall
Friendship can be very blinding. She likely convinced herself it was a joke. The sweeter a person the worse people they attract.
@TheRealGuywithoutaMustache3 жыл бұрын
"They even adopt Cruella's abused cat" Wow Cruella was one messed up character, but really unforgettable and memorable.
@Arackoon3 жыл бұрын
oh hey it you again i met you somewhere tho
@alexp.d36893 жыл бұрын
In the 1956 book Cruella has also murdered her cat's kittens by drowning them because her cat got pregnant from a stray cat
@afriendlycampfire2603 жыл бұрын
That’s it you’re the new Justin.Y
@mimistardust39153 жыл бұрын
Using both 'unforgettable' and 'memorable' is redundant 💀
@Satibogurl-Sat3 жыл бұрын
@@alexp.d3689 oh god
@BlankPapers3 жыл бұрын
Even as a kid, I thought that taking care of so many puppies was too much and selling them for adoption for all of them would be smart. Though, the specifics were unknown to me, glad MatPat cleared that up
@cookiecakeeater63403 жыл бұрын
They’re already rich. Just give them for free
@arandomidea90103 жыл бұрын
@@cookiecakeeater6340 Adoption fees aren't just for the actual money- it's to try and make sure the animals go to good homes. A free dog is much, much more likely to be used in dog fighting, abused, or neglected.
@ellugerdelacruz25553 жыл бұрын
"To save the England from it's overpopulation of 102 Dalmatians by turning about 51 of these dogs and pups into coats would be crazy feat. Luckily, I'm a crazy woman. Once I do it, the nation will thank me; because it'll be perfectly balanced as all things should be." -Cruella De Vil (w/Infinity Stones)
@Factsspoken2153 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pHTLdoJopJuZm6c 👀
@nitwebwetv91063 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHzZfHWji8uCa9E
@travisgoonan7667 Жыл бұрын
In the original book, Cruella didn’t need anyone’s help to get the idea to turn puppies into coats. In fact, she was more messed up in the book.
@tadstrange14653 жыл бұрын
I mean...how could you expect that your boss would literally be insane enough to try and kidnap your puppies and skin them? Anita probably just thought she was gonna try to recreate the feeling of Dalmatian fur through fabric or something.
@theia-3-3 жыл бұрын
My exact reaction
@Kraken_Dawn3 жыл бұрын
Anita: "She's mad but not evil... Right?" is a literal line in the movie! Like she even considered the possibility but it seemed so outlandish, even for Cruella to do it!
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs
@pyrotheevilplatypus3 жыл бұрын
Or she's just obsessed with textiles - on or off the animals. I love animals more than anything and would never in a million years ever hurt one, but when I learned to sew, suddenly everything that could be a potential textile became a fascinating "whatif" to me.
@seantaggart73823 жыл бұрын
I get that But All you need is to Grow skin cells from the coat
@emanibrown15443 жыл бұрын
It’s crazy how recognizable Cruella De vil is and I can’t even remember the owners names
@Blasted2Oblivion3 жыл бұрын
She is a really memorable villain.
@El-A13 жыл бұрын
Also remember Disney’s cruella is out this May 28th in theatres or on Disney+ with premium access 💅
I mean with a name like Cruella DeVille how could she not be recognisable!?
@joaogui01263 жыл бұрын
"Was Cruella ACTUALLY Wrong?" short answer: yes long answer: yes
@eagles52053 жыл бұрын
but like isnt the long answer no because you can sell the puppies for more the 10x the amount you would have made with the coats and not committed puppy murder
@joaogui01263 жыл бұрын
@@eagles5205 so the answer is yes she's wrong
@therealveridicalyt4973 жыл бұрын
Yeeeeees
@damianwayne30003 жыл бұрын
Yes but after watching cruella 2021 I totally understand why she did it
@sydney54383 жыл бұрын
Was cruella really going to skin them the original movie was never really clear about it and with the new movie was she really going to skin them or was she talking about something she never said she was going to skin them it makes you really think about everything in Descendants Cameron said his mom hated dogs but in the new movie she likes dogs nothing is really clear
@alexhulea27353 жыл бұрын
This is why i love matpat's theories: he tends to explain in exhaustive detail. Though i think the prices should have been in 1950s prices
@christinakinch3 жыл бұрын
The fact that they called their home a plantation, makes it seem to me, that Anita and her husband had every intention of selling some of those pups.
@chaosmastermind3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, a puppy plantation sounds like just a breeding ground for selling dogs.
@kaminari5183 жыл бұрын
it rhymes with dalmatian
@minnion28713 жыл бұрын
@@chaosmastermind That and alliteration.... Better than calling it a Mutt Mill right?
@ikeepscreamingbutgodwontan31323 жыл бұрын
I mean, why else would you keep so many dogs at your house?? Yea we all love dogs but like seriously??? Whoever wants so many dogs
@chatboulon7433 жыл бұрын
Yall some simple morons. Plantation rhymes with dalmatians, hence the joke.
@planetbob67033 жыл бұрын
I think Cruella is the only character who’s name people actually remember from that movie
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs .
@planetbob67033 жыл бұрын
@@lfkkkfk862 I am not clicking on that link
@Angel3x1113 жыл бұрын
Thats not true, I remember like two of the dogs names
@elfiot3 жыл бұрын
The dad Dalmatian was named Pongo, and I think one of the puppies was named Spot? And that was weird because they’re all spotted...Other than that I have no clue.
@Battle-Bunn1e3 жыл бұрын
I don’t even remember her henchmen’s names lol
@nicky553 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: how the author thought of the idea is that at a party someone said that her dog would make a great fur coat She also had about 8 dalmatians
@wellusee6883 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/apyZiI2EdsyoZqs .
@El-A13 жыл бұрын
Also remember Disney’s cruella is out this May 28th in theatres or on Disney+ with premium access 💅
@daff-ek7ns3 жыл бұрын
Lou, Mania, Juju - the holy trinity of promotion
@kkcake57713 жыл бұрын
Yep true
@themonocleguy3713 жыл бұрын
@@daff-ek7ns dudeee u dont have to roast them that hard
@nidohime62332 жыл бұрын
11:10 The moment where MatPatt never heard of neutering. 14:00 Is actually dangerous to breed a dog so young, most dogs breeders usually wait until the second or third heat where the animal's body is bigger. 14:15 Those kind of business already exist, there are called puppy mills. There are more worse than there sound.
@mattmcbride69613 жыл бұрын
Why do I feel like mat is preparin for when his son gets to that "I want a puppy" stage?
@MasumiSeike3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣 It sure foes
@ikeepscreamingbutgodwontan31323 жыл бұрын
@@MasumiSeike lol
@santzerosantone3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/jam8eWh5jcejj6M
@jazberrybear3 жыл бұрын
“Hey daddy? Can i get a doggy pweeeaaaaas?”
@mayawhitten-desroches98003 жыл бұрын
It's Matt's kid, he won't have that phase he'll have a “dad can we get a murderous animatronic from a shady restaurant, I promise I'll burn him and water his circuits” phase
@shadowrosegx3 жыл бұрын
I love how mattpat just automatically assumes that they wouldn't just have all the dogs either spayed or neutered.
@xraidpallet40263 жыл бұрын
Yeah he just jumps straight ahead
@SharpDesign3 жыл бұрын
In the live action, they definitely did not, they say "and their children, and their children, and their children..."
@humanbean86993 жыл бұрын
Technically that would also cost quite a bit of money as well, and its therefore cheaper to not have them spayed or neutured and sell off the puppies. Therefore it will end up more expensive to do so in loss of profits and money spent to look after the dogs
@ManyMonstersMedia3 жыл бұрын
@@humanbean8699 ok but at some point they will have flooded the market with Dalmatian puppies and the value will plummet they will either need to eventually get the dogs fixed or idk what they are gonna do with all those puppies no one wants :v
@santzerosantone3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/jam8eWh5jcejj6M
@sprinklechesed3 жыл бұрын
In the book, Anita and Roger actually buy Cruella's house in the country (the house where the puppies were imprisoned) because 1) it already had a huge wall, 2) it already had kennels, and 3) it was dirt cheap because Cruella had to flee the country due to being ruined financially by the dalmatians destroying all her furs as suggested by the abused cat. So there you go, Mat Pat: they were able to afford the house not only because Roger was a math wiz, but because of the abused cat's revenge on her nasty mistress.
@chrishale74803 жыл бұрын
I do love cats. Intelligent enough to purposely ruin your life but dumb enough to roll off the top of the fridge because you’re giving them head pats.
@mirjinou79993 жыл бұрын
My parents Said iff i gott 15k subss before thee endd off thee yearr,I wouldd get a new gaming PC.
@GradyDP3 жыл бұрын
@@mirjinou7999 now why would they do that? I would think that they would have a priority on teaching you how to spell.
@NessRandom13 жыл бұрын
@@dont9790 ok then
@testerwulf33573 жыл бұрын
Just because she fled doesn’t mean it was free..someone probably took over and sold it to them, of which they aren’t just gonna be like “y’all can have for free/cheap cause yes :)” that’s not selling houses works especially for the banks and such! They’re gonna sell it for it’s worth. So he isn’t entirely wrong that it’d cost a pretty penny plus they likely had to do some remodeling which would fill in the rest missing from the total. Not to mention if ruined financially you’d want more money, selling cheap makes no sense. If they’re stupid enough to care for 101 dogs they’re dumb enough to buy the house at full price.
@LAADY3653 жыл бұрын
Was I the only one who ever thought as a kid "why didn't they just try to find the original owners of the puppies?" I could never understand why they chose to keep all of them instead of returning them to their owners
@rosenewbie27733 жыл бұрын
According to the original novel, Cruella bought the rest of the puppies from their owners. She was only obsessed with Roger and Anita's puppies because they refused to sell.
@ice_pls Жыл бұрын
I mean maybe the owners didn't want them? I don't see why anyone would sell their dog if they were still willing and able to care of it.
@eway44 Жыл бұрын
I thought they were bought from Pet Stores
@melissacooper8724 Жыл бұрын
@eway44 In the animated film, the other puppies did say that they were bought at pet stores.
@SurprisedAlien-zt7wm2 ай бұрын
i thought it was because they couldnt find them plus may be some where strays and (worst) cruella dognapped them from someone who lived too far to be tracked so thats why anita,roger and nanny instead of having to do all a search decided to give the puppies a new family:theyrs(plus they are kind souls ❤)
@Nephrite_Harmony3 жыл бұрын
if anita gave cruella the idea for dalmatian coats in the 1996 movie, then matpat is forcing mrbeast's hand by unofficially challenging him to upkeep 101 real dalmatians as an experiment for a set amount of days
@yodoctor61753 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/bWaxo4uFereDh7c
@narindervirk21013 жыл бұрын
Yes please that needs to happen
@Diamond12343 жыл бұрын
(Cackles) FOR SCIENCE-
@milkywaycafe.3 жыл бұрын
@@Diamond1234 oh no 😂
@damnfeds70323 жыл бұрын
www.youtubegas.com/watch?v=svideoshot
@communist_oranges3 жыл бұрын
Cruella is basically the trope of "villain kicks puppy to show that they're the villain" but instead of kicking the puppy, she kills and skins it. Because ✨ *fashion* ✨
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs ..
@tomasferreira34153 жыл бұрын
Vanilla ice
@russiancheems22753 жыл бұрын
*JoJo villains intensify*
@cyberseai93053 жыл бұрын
Hotdog
@timechanger66793 жыл бұрын
Oof
@MissLilyputt3 жыл бұрын
Why would they need 101 beds or grooming supplies? Doesn’t Matt realize that dogs mostly don’t use the beds you give them so a better bet would be having dog houses, and patio furniture that the dogs can lay on that’s easily washed. The brushes can be used for more than one dog, the dogs can also be microchipped meaning they don’t need dog tags. You can use water troughs and refill them and wash them out with a hose instead of fancy fountains that use electricity. Get all the dogs spayed or neutered, which some organizations will offer low priced or even for free. If they turn their plantation into a non-profit for rescuing dalmatians then they can get discounts on food, flea and tick meds, ask for donations, etc. Why wouldn’t you have a personal vet if you’ve got 101 dogs? Wouldn’t it make more sense to have a staff of people 24/7 caring for them and cleaning up after them? You could get many people to volunteer to help so dog walking, feeding, watering, cleaning bowls and surfaces, dog bathing, playing with and treat giving could all be done by unpaid labor who need community service hours for a myriad of reasons (graduation, scholarships, probation, religious, etc)
@Mehk3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I was wondering the same thing. A lot of the costs in the video seem frivolous. The animal shelter near me has between 50-100 animals at all times, and they have less sources to provide care than a rich millionaire couple would have.
@StompMom53 жыл бұрын
Agreed. I was thinking the same thing. I have pets and I have pet beds. They almost Never use them. Some of the things mentioned were overdone because most people don't go that crazy with expenses with their pets
@BiggestPhangirl3 жыл бұрын
My dogs NEVER use their beds. They claimed a random bath towel one day and it’s been theirs ever since.
@blissfulrain3 жыл бұрын
@Ladon Beats Only 15 of the puppies were originally from the family. The rest of the 99 pups were literal rescues since they were rescued from an illegal fur operation so turning everything into a pet rescue would be the realistic course of events and honestly is basically what they did just using money from media sales of the incident instead of donations.
@riyaxziz3 жыл бұрын
We can only imagine MatPat’s search history and targeted adds...
@almendratlilkouatl3 жыл бұрын
Mostly satanism and diet pop
@cherrydragon31203 жыл бұрын
XD don't forget the fact he may be on a FBI watchlist
@sebastianortiz18413 жыл бұрын
Is no one going to talk about where is the original film theory intro?
@qwellyboy3 жыл бұрын
this made me laugh so hard!
@wi11owZ3 жыл бұрын
This explains the horror in parents face when their kids say "Mom I want that puppy 😭"
@Pleasesubscribe9623 жыл бұрын
I already have a puppy
@caramelcandys3 жыл бұрын
As a recent dog owner, i can agree
@bluebutler67873 жыл бұрын
Having an intelligent pet is like having a child. Its costly and they will guarantee make meeses that you will have to clean. Is it worth it? Depends.
@moofey69003 жыл бұрын
I have 3 puppies
@keyoteamendelbar87423 жыл бұрын
Instead of going to a pet store to buy a puppy, my mom went to a dog shelter.
@majester20783 жыл бұрын
I thought this episode would be about calculating how many coats the puppies could make but it’s nice to know someone beat Matt to it.
@Imersity3 жыл бұрын
Who?
@shaninejackman93953 жыл бұрын
Ooo,I’m curious plz tell us Who that is
@melissam26663 жыл бұрын
11:48 Guys Theyre talking about what MatPat already said in the video, the article that he mentioned duh
@HandiDandiBrandi3 жыл бұрын
"Is Cruella ACTUALLY wrong?" I'm calling it before I watch the video. Yes After watching- still yes. What was the theory? lol
@QueenOfMilkKingdom3 жыл бұрын
lol clickbaited a bit
@cheeto.burrito3 жыл бұрын
The title is trashy clickbait; the real video is "How expensive is it to care for 101 dalmatians"
@dogeboithedoomslayer3 жыл бұрын
@@cheeto.burrito but would anyone really click on a video with that title?
@blade52803 жыл бұрын
Y-you didn’t edit the comment
@HandiDandiBrandi3 жыл бұрын
@@blade5280 I didn't need to
@steveluna16273 жыл бұрын
I swear Mat Patt would try to prove that even Anakin didn't do anything wrong when he killed those kids
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs
@wellusee6883 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/apyZiI2EdsyoZqs . ....
@oblivious1163 жыл бұрын
Weeeeeeeell LMFAO
@catqueenstudios85423 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@juanmanuelpenaloza92643 жыл бұрын
Pumped Up Lightsabers
@lemonxtract3 жыл бұрын
Cruella De Vil, the villain who literally killed puppies and name is basically “Cruel Devil”.
@disneyvillainsfan16663 жыл бұрын
You Know someone is pure evil when their name literally spells "Cruel Devil."
@Begood1433 жыл бұрын
CERY SMART
@S1EEPLES53 жыл бұрын
*angry John Wick noises*
@jaydentorres2543 жыл бұрын
You could also see it as cruella d evil
@jemstheamerican78173 жыл бұрын
Her last name may derive from the dutch word villen, which means skinning, so pretty much a spawn of the devil that wants to skin puppies
@strawberryskygirl443 жыл бұрын
"but it was very fine when she was a puppy!1!1!1!" classic example of talking way too much 😭
@El-A13 жыл бұрын
Also remember Disney’s cruella is out this May 28th in theatres or on Disney+ with premium access 💅
@RC.-3 жыл бұрын
@@El-A1 nobody asked
@NekoPrissy3 жыл бұрын
When I saw the title of this video, I wondered how MatPat could possibly justify puppy murder. Then when he started talking about how expensive it would be to own them, I really hoped that wasn't the actual justification because no amount of money it would take to raise all those dogs is reason enough to turn them into coats. Luckily, he didn't end up justifying puppy murder. The answer to "Was Cruella actually wrong" according to MatPat was thankfully "yes." I also guessed that the best option would be to put the puppies up for adoption. Good video.
@amberlyon25342 жыл бұрын
Cruella took some of the puppies from Anita. Wouldn't she have taken some of them from other families too? How about giving them to their rightful owners? That would be the right thing to do. Breeding them would be Cruel too. If Cruella didn't get them from families, then that just shows how many homeless dalmatians there are. Selling them would get themselves $ and those dogs happy. But what about the homeless ones that already exist? Unless your breading an endangered animal, I think it's cruel to breed them.
@ice_pls Жыл бұрын
@@amberlyon2534 so get more stray dalmations? Plus I thought she bought the other dogs. Doesn't that mean their original owners likely didn't want them around?
@nikskyson223 жыл бұрын
So since no one was searching for Cruella until she stole Rorger's and Anita's puppies she was basically sitting on a gold mine with all these dalmatians and she decided to make a fur coat instead of all this money? I guess she seriously wanted that coat.
@ggjk84193 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs .
@RLucas30003 жыл бұрын
Dahling, it’s for the fashion
@qwqwo30383 жыл бұрын
@@RLucas3000 okay Cruella
@autumbreeze11293 жыл бұрын
Plus, she'd have gotten away with it too if she simply didn't go after Anita's puppies. Without that, no one would've even known and Cruella would've gotten her coat without a single problem
@RikoJAmado3 жыл бұрын
Cruella De Vil's own greed for just a couple more puppies was ultimately her demise.
@Kathbunny23 жыл бұрын
They could probably turn it into a petting zoo of sorts, and make money off it, alongside more songs and games. It would make a ton of money for them! Especially with that publicity.
@ggjk84193 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs
@isaaclucas79873 жыл бұрын
@@ggjk8419 no i ain’t clicken dat
@kowhaifan12493 жыл бұрын
The money isn’t so much the issue as it is time.
@JohnDlugosz3 жыл бұрын
You should talk to breeders about the costs of "bulk" supplies and services, rather than multiplying the cost of an ordinary house pet. A single bath of flea dip can be used for many dogs in succession for the same price that a pet owner uses for one or two animals. A vet will contract with breeders to do checkups and vaccinations for entire litters. You can get food that's not packaged for consumer shopping, in quarter-ton shipments. Meanwhile, there's more at issue than the expense of keeping the dogs: how do you keep them happy, besides walks, food, and healthcare? You'll need *people* around for the dogs to spend time with. Face-licking time is essential for the dogs' well-being, too.
@MissLilyputt3 жыл бұрын
Yes, not only breeders but animal rescue organizations can get discounts on buying massive quantities which can be a substantial savings. They also don’t need a different brush for every single dog and they’re so adorable that who wouldn’t want to volunteer to play with and walk those pups? If they wanted to they could make it so the plantation doesn’t have fleas or ticks by keeping the grass cut and spraying insecticide.
@mentalbreakdance13223 жыл бұрын
@@MissLilyputt insecticide could make the dogs sick if they ingest it
@selimasadfi23313 жыл бұрын
it would still be too much
@MissLilyputt3 жыл бұрын
@@mentalbreakdance1322 Don’t let your pets in the yard the day you apply the insecticide in the grass. There’s also pet friendly alternatives that do just about as good as the strong poisonous kind.
@bbgun0613 жыл бұрын
Great! That just means more profit for Roger and Anita. They're already earning at least $400k per year, I'm sure they can hire a few full time helpers... And it shouldn't be difficult to pay for that mansion at that rate.
@DanielRodriguez-gs2xj2 жыл бұрын
I like how Mat's third option sounded a LOT like a puppy mill operation lol
@Bambo4613 жыл бұрын
Next game theory video about dogs: *How much would it cost to have Clifford The Big Red Dog as a pet*
@annoyedbipolar74243 жыл бұрын
The video they linked is in French, FYI.
@timwoods28523 жыл бұрын
Oh gosh, yes! Imagine being the runt of the litter only to find out you have gigantism.
@kevinquinonez8383 жыл бұрын
I guess it will be a bit cheaper than taking care of 101 dalmatians
@monkeyboy85693 жыл бұрын
DROWNED in POOP??? How LONG until CLIFFORD BREAKS you!?
@ashtrash13753 жыл бұрын
Actually not a bad film theory idea lmfao
@TheNaturalGlow.3 жыл бұрын
So today we were watching Disney’s Hercules in class. We were all watching the movie, when I started wondering how strong Hercules really is. His strength is probably already known, but I wanted to ask anyways because I knew you could probably make a cool video out of it that would be very entertaining and informational.
@JohnDlugosz3 жыл бұрын
I think that would be different for every movie and the classic stories. Like superman, it's physic-defying so you can't really compute an answer anyway.
@chatboulon7433 жыл бұрын
Literal god-like strength. He's a god, turned mostly human.
@CWTyger3 жыл бұрын
There's an old animated Hercules series where the lyrics of the opening theme actually say he has the strength of ten ordinary men, so that version's strength would seem to have been measured by someone at some point.
@NuggetOG3 жыл бұрын
@@CWTyger bruh, he couldnt lift even half of the strongest man that lived(in terms of pure lifting capabilites)
@fluffynator62223 жыл бұрын
Well, in the myths he carried the sky in place of a titan. So I'd see he's very strong.
@donutchan81143 жыл бұрын
Unfun fact: due to the movies a lot of people went and adopted Dalmatians, found they were hard to maintain, and abandoned them. It makes sense for a little kid to be enthused for a dog, but seriously, if you as a parent don't know what it takes to take care of A dog, much less a dalmatian or other high upkeep dog, DON'T. Its like taking care of a person whose mind is stunted at 3-4 year old child, but its a dog and therefore not a felony to abandon when the going gets tough, its just a moral quandary. Tldr: don't adopt dogs unless you're accepting you're essentially raising a child with special needs.
@vylbird80143 жыл бұрын
A similar thing happened with anemonefish after Finding Nemo, and parrots after Rio. Movies can create pet fads. I want a parrot, but I also have a realistic idea of the effort and commitment required, so no parrot for me.
@fl45hbrg3 жыл бұрын
@@vylbird8014 and that makes you a responsible person. TY for being responsible. My mother in law works as a vet and a 1-2 year old puppy was tied to a house while the owners moved away. Makes me sick that she deals with that kind of thing every couple of weeks. I wish more people thought as you do.
@Joe_Potts3 жыл бұрын
Sad but true message Although some dogs are easier to maintain. My shih tzu doesnt have all the needs a dalmatian has (they are rather lazy and are perfectly fine with wet food or chicken) Mine is a little spoiled because i have to pick him up onto my bed each night to sleep. He's tiny but he finds just the right spot to block most of the bed lol
@Joe_Potts3 жыл бұрын
@@fl45hbrg that is horrifying People are so cruel
@donutchan81143 жыл бұрын
@Jesus Gonzalez She stole like 100 puppies to skin them. She wasn't gonna eat them, and didnt indicate the desire to sell the meat either. How is this a story of "misdirected love"?
@mcaelm3 жыл бұрын
"Im just hoping they keep the part about her serial killer grandpa in there" Well they didnt but at least they made her mother a narcisistic murderer (implied to have killed multiple people)
@btetirick3 жыл бұрын
I would like to note that when I was a kid, I always assumed that the puppy plantation was always meant as a stopgap until they could find good owners for all the puppies.
@damotoneko15003 жыл бұрын
Not to mention they could expand it to a dog park after seeing ALL that open land. The dalmatians wouldnt be permanently seperated that way. WIN-WIN-WIN!
@Kahtisemo3 жыл бұрын
Quite possibly. In the live action sequel this lady has Dipstick iirc, one of the puppies from the first movie and he's all grown with puppies of his own that get targeted. So adopting them out seems likely. Edit: Oh he talked about the sequels. Cool 😂
@OnyxLee3 жыл бұрын
The silliest story of my childhood: kidnapping puppies can’t sustain, nor meet the need for mass production, while printing patterns will give you a lot more control over the texture and cost.
@tsurbwobniar203 жыл бұрын
I thought she wanted to make one for herself personally
@ellugerdelacruz25553 жыл бұрын
"To save the England from it's overpopulation of 102 Dalmatians by turning about 51 of these dogs and pups into coats would be crazy feat. Luckily, I'm a crazy woman. Once I do it, the nation will thank me; because it'll be perfectly balanced as all things should be." -Cruella De Vil (w/Infinity Stones)
@theparkershow25363 жыл бұрын
@@dont9790 is that all you comment?
@nitwebwetv91063 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHzZfHWji8uCa9E
@solereflection92843 жыл бұрын
Now that’s thinking smart. Cost efficiency was probably not Cruella’s strongest focus.
@RH-xp7ju3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Cruella De Vil was actually really beautiful in the book, Disney decided she was a villain and decided to make her look more haggish! In the concept art she was beautiful as well!
@WillowMoonspirit2 жыл бұрын
Yeah like all Disney villains get drawn in a really shitty way making them look stupid also THE LIVE ACTION CRUELLA DE VIL MOVIE IS SO GOOD!!!!!!!
@ariesearthdragon Жыл бұрын
Obviously, pretty can't be evil and vice versa.
@RH-xp7ju Жыл бұрын
@@ariesearthdragon tell that to hundreds of pretty villains
@Caridadfabero274 Жыл бұрын
@@ariesearthdragon say that to the new 2021 movie
@vanifanai7470 Жыл бұрын
@@ariesearthdragon bro bieng pretty can be used for evil
@velvetsky34513 жыл бұрын
me: oh cruella isn't so ba- "she abused her cat" me: yeet her from this plane of existence
@stingray90003 жыл бұрын
This is quite possibly the funniest reveals about Disney’s hilariously strange ideas for good hero’s and bad villains
@wellusee6883 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/apyZiI2EdsyoZqs . ..
@El-A13 жыл бұрын
Also remember Disney’s cruella is out this May 28th in theatres or on Disney+ with premium access 💅
@yourundertaleobsessedlesbi69753 жыл бұрын
@juju ikr I'm so exited 💅
@samwitherington82023 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see what Mattpatt's search history is like after doing these.
@pkmntrainermark88813 жыл бұрын
Thanks to NordVPN, you can't.
@neongalactic783 жыл бұрын
@@pkmntrainermark8881 lol
@sreeraghnair36763 жыл бұрын
@@pkmntrainermark8881 you would make a wonderful you tuber
@pkmntrainermark88813 жыл бұрын
@@sreeraghnair3676 Is this the part where I tell you to go to my channel, even though it's terrible?
@Isajinglebells3 жыл бұрын
There's also the Wall-E episode
@Maxongb33 жыл бұрын
"Hey, you know that book about a demon spawn that wants to murder a bunch of dog babies? Let's turn that into a kids movie!" - Walt disney.
@_jamil.pk_3 жыл бұрын
Subscribe me plss
@bobraekevelt79533 жыл бұрын
@Gabriel Lopez de Azua *using every/any channel to promote you’re own
@bobraekevelt79533 жыл бұрын
@Savannah Kelly I’m the Cheshire cat, who we’re you looking for?
@psychott63 жыл бұрын
That’s really what Disney is, you see Pinnochio and Cinderella and the stories are so much darker in the originals
@velvettyz32953 жыл бұрын
@@bobraekevelt7953 *your (I'm not trying to feel better about myself, but we need to burn whomever that kind of people with still using grammar correctly).
@mlgsponge78323 жыл бұрын
as a kid currently watching your channel, you've made my childhood better
@bm-ub6zc3 жыл бұрын
Real talk: Matpat's original profession was business consultant. One can totally see that through this video.
@jessielefey3 жыл бұрын
Matpat's primary profession now is business consultant so far as I can see. Theory is a side hustle at this point, so far as we can understand from the (sensibly) little he talks about. The real money is in analytics coaching.
@notme12823 жыл бұрын
@@jessielefey I mean, his channel is his business, not sure if this is a joke or not but he says that he can write business expenses off on taxes so that means his channels are registered businesses, also didn't he say he had a degree in Neuroscience at one point?
@raspberryicecream71813 жыл бұрын
No. Accountant
@leland8182 жыл бұрын
Dual degree from Duke in Theater and Neuroscience. Did do some consulting (while trying acting and producing) in NY initially after graduation, but the job did not pay enough. Decided to start posting KZbin videos around this time and it grew from there
@quiondasjj92933 жыл бұрын
“Was Cruella actually wrong?” Matthew, she wanted to skin puppies.
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs
@wellusee6883 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/apyZiI2EdsyoZqs . ...
@Cottagewh0re3 жыл бұрын
How is that any different from skinning minks?
@axo238673 жыл бұрын
@@wellusee688 what does this have to do with anything
@quiondasjj92933 жыл бұрын
@@Cottagewh0re this isn’t Twitter just stop
@TH0KH3 жыл бұрын
"professional dog walkers make a minimum of 35k a year". My professional dog walker friends would like to have an interview with whoever is paying that much 😂
@RebekahAntis3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if he was just meaning in London? I was also unsure where that number came from!
@VforVendettas3 жыл бұрын
I am also a pro dog walker and I want in on that.
@SupHapCak3 жыл бұрын
That was probably total instead of the average
@ChrisPepper19893 жыл бұрын
Film theory theory. MatPat took top end UK hourly rate ( £20) and then multiplied by 7 by 5 by 52. Which comes to roughly that amount. The faux paux was saying that amount is what a dog walker *makes* in a year! When obviously no dog walker is able to work 7 hours a day, 5 days a week consistently... Unless they were employed by an estate that owned 101 Dalmatians of course :)
@andresv.88803 жыл бұрын
@@ChrisPepper1989 nah 25 dollars per hour working 5 hours per day and 5 days of the week in 52 weeks is 32,500. And it's not crazy for professional dog workers to ask for about 25 pee hour here in the us, higher end areas might even pay up to 60.
@firefli99753 жыл бұрын
Kinda surprised that Mat hasn't made a Film Theory on Captain Underpants. Sort of seems like his kind of thing.
@familjenfurumark7883 жыл бұрын
Dew it
@Kari-tu3fs3 жыл бұрын
There are a couple things overlooked on the pricing. Being a large farm for dogs, the veterinary visits wouldn't be charged at the full individual rate. There would, most likely as it would become a permanent customer be significantly lower.
@ohrats7313 жыл бұрын
And they could use their savings to spay and neuter lol. But I guess that would cut into the mad profits of selling purebred Dalmatians. But then again, if you saturate the market then prices will crash so they should spay/neuter most of them if they want to keep breeding. But like... don’t because it’s already such a fragile breed. Unpopular opinions?
@The_Kaichu3 жыл бұрын
Honestly, if they were turning it into a business like suggested at the end of the video, they could probably actually hire a vet to live on/near that ranch and specifically take care of the dalmatians and other various animals.
@kevinbarnard3553 жыл бұрын
Also, they could buy food in bulk, possibly directly from a manufacturer. The insurance costs might go up or down depending on a higher rate for running a business vs "bundling". Chances are pretty good any savings would be lost to the home owner's insurance going through the roof.
@fancysfolly5543 жыл бұрын
@@The_Kaichu that would be quite an undertaking....is there a high demand for Dalmatians right now?
@LMeg93 жыл бұрын
“Dalmatian’s can start breeding as young as 6 months.” No. No. Bad Matpat. Yes, dogs can start breeding as young as 6 months, but for the health of the dog you shouldn’t start breeding until they are about 2 years old. AND you shouldn’t breed every heat cycle but should rather wait and breed every other cycle. And they should be retired from breeding after about 3 litters.
@michaelburns20033 жыл бұрын
Ok dam, he just using the figures to there MAX, cut him & cruella some slack
@patricksfriendbobthesponge82563 жыл бұрын
Yeah. A 6 month old dog is about 8 years old for dogs. That's pretty messed up...
@Megan45093 жыл бұрын
I cringed when he said that too lol. I'd like to think the owners would just get all the dogs spayed/neutered myself...but if they did want to breed some I'd really hope they would make sure they pass proper testing and reach 2 years of age first
@priestly81643 жыл бұрын
Also, aren't all of them siblings?
@JohnDlugosz3 жыл бұрын
@@priestly8164 13 of them are littermates of the 2 parents. The other 86 puppies were rescued from Cruella, and presumably were from many different litters by different mothers (since they were all about the same age).
@kindalucky3 жыл бұрын
This actually sounds like they could afford all of this based on how much money they've made in the books. Thank you for helping my childhood Mat pat.
@ggjk84193 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs .
@teddycat72183 жыл бұрын
Plus one brush is good for like half of the dogs
@thenigerianprince70173 жыл бұрын
Wait,that's ilegall!
@danebolke57223 жыл бұрын
Film theory: helping your childhood from 2011
@interopsty3 жыл бұрын
@@ggjk8419 w h y
@Nick_C199711 ай бұрын
I always assumed that Cruella didn’t care about the cost of the coats since, in the original novel and film, she wanted the coats for herself, it wasn’t until the live action movies made her a fashion designer
@sm0rie3 жыл бұрын
Does anyone ever think about how cruela and yzma look similar in design.. like high cheekbones and very skinny. Elegant furs and accent pieces to make them look evilly rich.. Idk why this was important for me to mention
@jackswan34203 жыл бұрын
Now got a headcanon Ezma is one of Cruella's distant great grandaunts or something. Edit: Spelt Ezma's name wrong.
@Yumi_Jay3 жыл бұрын
Isn't that Yzma thou?
@sm0rie3 жыл бұрын
@@Yumi_Jay idk if u mean the spelling or what but I didn't know how to spell it and was convinced I did it right lol
@zeldaenby2243 жыл бұрын
@@sm0rie it's definitely Yzma
@sm0rie3 жыл бұрын
@@zeldaenby224 thanks, I'll correct it
@abigailwollam68943 жыл бұрын
“Puppies eat smaller amounts” there were a lot of flaws in this theory but I’m roaring at this. It’s the opposite. Once they regulate their metabolism, adult dogs eat less.
@AttemptedPretzelMaker2 жыл бұрын
This theory is perfect you’re wrong
@AttemptedPretzelMaker2 жыл бұрын
😑
@GameyCat2 жыл бұрын
@@AttemptedPretzelMaker ?
@AttemptedPretzelMaker2 жыл бұрын
@@heartsonev2112 that is a 4 month old comment you think i care? Plus im right not you. Google it.
@whyioughta1783 жыл бұрын
I think a hole in this theory is that we are putting high standards of care into these dogs, possibly higher standards than the average dog owner would of had back then.
@Zurpador1643 жыл бұрын
Exactly, especially if they are in a big farm, dog walkers in a farm? a toy for every single dog? this is too much
@albertoHammyer3 жыл бұрын
@@Zurpador164 not only that, but considering how smart the dogs are it shouldn't take long for them to start to help out, you're supposed to keep up the disney magic after the end of the story, otherwise it really wouldn't work
@ashchapman31643 жыл бұрын
They seem to be using the modern movie as a base though
@albertoHammyer3 жыл бұрын
@@ashchapman3164 yeah, can't argue with that
@michaelburns20033 жыл бұрын
True, why did he use that ' interpitation' the only good thing about it is that Anita is givern a hobby that actually makes sense, how she was able to cross paths with cruella de vil. FASHION is a language that MOST women speak, just whatch what happens when a clothes store has a 75% off sale
@GaBoiGregG3 жыл бұрын
Everyone seems to forget the fact that Cruella potentially bought some of those puppies and some of the others probably had owners as well who would want them back... in the real world, Cruella would have had at least enough for herself a coat... and they would have adopted about 50...
@Amokra3 жыл бұрын
fact in the book some of the puppies were the stolen puppies of the wet nurse dog they had to get for Perdita and the father of the dogs show up as well that's how they got 101 so 4 adult dogs and 97 puppies (15/8 Perdita/wet nurse the rest other sources)
@quitequeerquesadilla3 жыл бұрын
The title: Was Cruella really evil? The theory: dogs are expensive
@kanaboshii3 жыл бұрын
The links above me are self promotions in different languages
@thedootlord3 жыл бұрын
@@kanaboshii reported it
@bruhbruh54203 жыл бұрын
@@thedootlord why
@perhapsadog71303 жыл бұрын
@@bruhbruh5420 because it is spam
@bruhbruh54203 жыл бұрын
@@perhapsadog7130 i reported it but i think nothing will happen
@beastproductions25893 жыл бұрын
Your search history must look insanely strange considering how much research goes into these amazing videos
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs
@El-A13 жыл бұрын
Also remember Disney’s cruella is out this May 28th in theatres or on Disney+ with premium access 💅
@FinnManusia3 жыл бұрын
He uses NordVPN of course so no search history.
@catqueenstudios85423 жыл бұрын
Oh no now I want to see his search history! 😅😂
@dinoboilookingforthemnuggi31523 жыл бұрын
@@El-A1 why are you spamming the same thing over and over again because
@Ren_1843 жыл бұрын
The chase scene was so good
@wellusee6883 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/apyZiI2EdsyoZqs . .. .......
@almostdead5553 жыл бұрын
Too scared to click on the links and stop watching the theory
Can we bring back the old Disney animation? It’s so beautiful it makes me want to cry
@216trixie3 жыл бұрын
Sure, lets turn off the computers.
@AirQBert3 жыл бұрын
I was really sad when they killed the Disney animation department, but the harsh truth is that CGI is cheaper and quicker not to mention Disney’s last hand drawn movies were flops financially speaking... wait, did I learn that from a Matpat theory?
@franknbeans89043 жыл бұрын
@@AirQBert Except that anime still comes out regularly and that is pretty popular.
@saffi_taffi3 жыл бұрын
@@franknbeans8904 anime may be hand drawn but it isn't on paper, which is the style that the old Disney movies were in. Also would you REALLY want a Disney movie to be animated looking like an anime? Anime is cool n all but that would kinda destroy the magic
@AirQBert3 жыл бұрын
@@franknbeans8904 anime is not the Disney animation we were referring to AND is largely being CGI assisted as well. But can you honestly tell me that DB Super is up the the quality standards of OG Disney? Or even up to the standards of the Frieza and Cell sagas of DBZ?
@aesthetics76493 жыл бұрын
Honestly the “REDEMPTION” was hilarious 😂
@solereflection92843 жыл бұрын
In Anita’s defense from the intro, she was a people pleaser who didn’t want any confrontation, especially with her job on the line. A lot of us are like that, and it honestly sucks at times to the point that we don’t know how to stop more often than not. Cruella de Ville is not the type of person to cross paths with, but if you do, you aren’t left with many options.
@bartistclord19163 жыл бұрын
Then the ideal answer to all the questions would be "I don't know"
@solereflection92843 жыл бұрын
@@bartistclord1916, that was a very general statement with confusing and vaguely unrelated context. Could you please explain?
@thedukeofchutney4683 жыл бұрын
Being a people pleaser isn't an excuse its a moral flaw that people need to work through. Its like refusing food from someone in abject poverty because you're picky. Its YOUR problem.
@bartistclord19163 жыл бұрын
@@solereflection9284 When the puppy killer asks her about how soft the fur is, say "I don't know" DO NOT SAY " They were soooo soft as puppies". Instead of giving a pro-puppy-murder list to please her boss, save the puppies by disappointing the puppy-killler. When someones asks something they don't know, you can "be in the same boat" "on the same page" by pointing out that "I don't know either"
@solereflection92843 жыл бұрын
@@bartistclord1916, you are basing that knowledge on the viewers perspective as a movie, not Anita's perspective as a character IN the movie bound by story limitations. Easy question for anyone who pays attention to story flow: How does Anita know what Cruella intends without prior knowledge? She doesn't know what Cruella does behind the scenes of the business. In the live motion version, furs are still legal and Cruella has NOT been convicted of any misdeeds or illegal actions, only controversial clothing lines as far as the story's public is concerned. Anita, AS A STORY CHARACTER, has nothing to go on nor logical reaction to the contrary until AFTER seeing Cruella's manic reactions, especially considering that she was one of Cruella's top designers who, while attempting to steer Cruella toward fur alternatives, still continued to work for her until long after. Something else to keep in mind: when you get asked about something you care about, unless you are that badly distrusting of others, you are more than likely going to talk about said thing openly without much hesitation until you realize afterward that you might have said too much, not during. Anita was happy to talk about her growing family. Wouldn't you be? She only realized the mistake AFTER Cruella kept going strictly into the fur discussion. Again, you need to think about these things in better context instead of acting like all situations are the same. People are different, situations are different, results are different. Anita was not a mistake in her behavior, and that moment in the movie is incredibly realistic when you actually pay attention.
@DIAMONDStudios3 жыл бұрын
Cruella coming soon ...
@thekaizer3 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@sethlibal95953 жыл бұрын
The 28th
@kinyutaka3 жыл бұрын
Because we totally need a whole new movie to tell us why she is terrifying and evil.
@theweirdochannel87353 жыл бұрын
@@sethlibal9595 That soon?
@thedotgiver28203 жыл бұрын
.
@lulua62033 жыл бұрын
*Villain who literally murders puppies* Mat: BUT LIKE IS SHE ACTUALLY THAT BAD THOUGH?
@yodoctor61753 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/bWaxo4uFereDh7c
@chicknugs3 жыл бұрын
She also drown the kittens that her cat kept having in the original book. She’s messed up 😂😂
@AlyxIsSpelledWeird3 жыл бұрын
Film Theory: Was Cruella ACTUALLY Wrong? Me not even bothering to watch the theory yet: Yes
@Joe_Potts3 жыл бұрын
Today I Learned: Pet insurance is apparently a thing. Your turn!: Cruella's father's name was Malevola De Ville. Cruel. Mal- meaning evil, Vile. Add in MatPat's comments about the serial killer grandpa and the entire bloodline is based on evilness.
@Glisten4563 жыл бұрын
So, really, Cruella is Cruel The Vile, and her father is Malevolent The Vile. Something tells me that they're the villains.
@Joe_Potts3 жыл бұрын
@@Glisten456 (surprised pikachu face)
@sirpattheperson3 жыл бұрын
And PLUS, De Ville LITERALLY spells Devil (And Yes, I’m pretty sure you already knew), so Lucifer has some CRAZY offspring and descendants.
@Joe_Potts3 жыл бұрын
@@sirpattheperson i never realized that part wow
@Joe_Potts3 жыл бұрын
@@sirpattheperson @The Eggman 456 this now means Cruella De Ville means Cruel Devil. it just keeps getting deeper!!!
@alexiarosalia3 жыл бұрын
mat saying “anita girl honey* is the best thing I have ever heard
@acy42593 жыл бұрын
Mhm!
@Just_an_icy_lad3 жыл бұрын
Um okay.
@rickypedia9993 жыл бұрын
In the original book, they actually purchased Cruella's house after she went broke from the dogs (and Cruella's spiteful cat) ruined her fur coat collection (most of which hadn't been paid for yet). Yep, they painted it in dalamtion spot pattern after buying it, almost like one giant bleep you to her. Since she was at a point of desperation, they were able to get it for a remarkably cheap value. So, there goes the first major price issue.
@kelpogaming4922 Жыл бұрын
One thing i noticed is I hope he knows you can just use the same grooming equipment you just have to clean them, you don’t need 101 different grooming items💀
@yamibakura85973 жыл бұрын
Theory: Anita and Rodger use the poop from their many, many dogs to produce methane and then burn it to generate electricity, which powers their plantation. They also sell the excess energy, which helps to fund their interesting lifestyle.
@haroldb18563 жыл бұрын
If they built a dog poop methane plant, the gas produced would be considered renewable natural gas (RNG), which has low net carbon emissions. So, they could market their puppies as low carbon Dalmatians, raise the price and maybe get climate subsidies.
@9gaglover3213 жыл бұрын
I always thought that in the live action movie, the ending was that they actually became breeders. They bought the land and planned to breed them because I associated “Dalmatian plantation” as like a pure bred farm
@jitterbug42453 жыл бұрын
**A new movie trailer comes out** Me: *Yeah MatPats probably gonna do it again*
@_jamil.pk_3 жыл бұрын
Subscribe me plss
@zaheraparveen40593 жыл бұрын
@Jesus Gonzalez 5.9
@zaheraparveen40593 жыл бұрын
@Jesus Gonzalez G600
@eagelswift2 жыл бұрын
I'd like to add the note that in the book it was actually 97puppies and 4 adult dogs. There was one litter that had brown spots - they'd probably be used to make the muff 😉
@nodatedpixel40933 жыл бұрын
"Welcome to film theory, the channel that crushes kid's dreams by telling them their favorite Disney character was actually evil"
@w1ndgeneral2263 жыл бұрын
"You, front door, car, mental institute, they've been looking for you, goodbye."
@nidalflame88943 жыл бұрын
*wait a minute*
@sonofjafarreturns3 жыл бұрын
Cruella was already evil so does this really count?
@GuineaPigEveryday3 жыл бұрын
I've never felt more stressed seeing MatPat explain one after another part of owning 101 Dalmations that would be exhausting to deal with, extremely expensive and impossible to manage. Lol I just finished the video and that ending was really wholesome and heart-warming though
@zestyoverlord67723 жыл бұрын
Every body gives characters like Joker, Palatine, and Voldemort a bad time for being “incarnations of evil” but Crulela just on a whole nother level.
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs ...
@marijamarcelic31493 жыл бұрын
@@lfkkkfk862 dont promote yourself kid
@coconutthecockatiel4783 жыл бұрын
Palps isn't an incarnation of evil. He's the Senate.
@thekingnerd66393 жыл бұрын
Cruella is nearing Umbridge levels of pure evil. While voldemort has a reason for being evil, immortality, Umbridge gains nothing. Even Cruella gains something, a fur coat
@J-manli3 жыл бұрын
@@thekingnerd6639 Umbridge did seek social standing, power, and control. She LOVED telling people what to do, say, act, and think. So while not a physical goal or item, she did have something to gain from being evil.
@rainstorm26063 жыл бұрын
I like how you brought up the possibility of the puppies eventually having puppies too and then led into an alternate for that- and yet the alternate was puppy murder and not, y'know, spaying and neutering. Spay/neuter your animals unless you plan to breed, folks.
@connorirons45423 жыл бұрын
As a person with a Dalmatian, I can say that one is enough. Theres a reason why we have to keep bins, shoes, paper, DVDS, plastic bags and other such things in places he cant reach.
*"hey, you know that book about the demon spawn he wants to murder a bunch of animal babies? Let's turn that into a kid's movie!"* Yep, sounds like Disney to me
@wellusee6883 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/apyZiI2EdsyoZqs . . .
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs ...
@RaphBlade72 жыл бұрын
Personally I don't know why MattPatt didn't consider the possibility that they'd have the puppies spayed and neutered, though it does make sense that they wouldn't given how much money they'd make by selling the puppies.
@rowanbelling39313 жыл бұрын
Bright side of all this math: You are prepared for your side of the argument if Ollie ever decides he wants a puppy.
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs ...
@El-A13 жыл бұрын
Also remember Disney’s cruella is out this May 28th in theatres or on Disney+ with premium access 💅
@jamestheaverageman69593 жыл бұрын
@@El-A1 cool, hey wanna know a fun fact: bots are annoying
@pkmntrainerred42473 жыл бұрын
@@jamestheaverageman6959 I don't think he/she is a bot bro...... just promoting the movie I guess
@csharkop3 жыл бұрын
@@pkmntrainerred4247 they're saying the exact same thing on most comments, that's bot behavior.
@Chris.py_Nugget3 жыл бұрын
1st-Film Theory Idea: The Bee Movie: How many bees does it take to lift a plane? 2nd-Game Theory Idea: Super Mario : How does Mario get healed by touching coins?/Do they have a healing ability?/How do the coins provide air to Mario in Super Mario 64?
@SnickersEatsCookies3 жыл бұрын
They did the bee movie one
@gengar6183 жыл бұрын
“Was Cruella wrong?” Yes. That’s the end of the discussion.
@HasufelyArod3 жыл бұрын
Yes, but neither are the protagonists, Roger and Anita, entirely correct. Can they look after 101 puppies? I know it's a movie, and the last thing one should do is take it seriously.
@gengar6183 жыл бұрын
@@HasufelyArod I wasn’t here defending them lol. Just saying what the truth is they’re all awful
@HasufelyArod3 жыл бұрын
@@gengar618 makes sense. Understandable
@EustaceHotef63972 жыл бұрын
1:44 - I don't think I would watch the theories if they were purebred. They might not even _want_ to be watched.
@wings70913 жыл бұрын
Can we do a count for how many times MattPatt said “101” or “dollars”
@markbiwit17553 жыл бұрын
e
@LotlLabs3 жыл бұрын
e
@xraidpallet40263 жыл бұрын
Probs around 42 and 26
@everythingchannel.readabou73922 жыл бұрын
Ok
@auroraroyal18112 жыл бұрын
“101” was said 20 times, “dollars” was said 24 times, and for fun I threw in “Dalmatian” which was said 25 times
@ink_b0ttle3 жыл бұрын
This would of been a perfect episode to team up with an organization that helps to take care and save animals in need. It takes so much money and time to help and care for animals that need the help
@heikesiegl26403 жыл бұрын
Yep! Missed opportunity
@DianaHernandez-gv7fc3 жыл бұрын
No.
@DarkPsychoMessiah3 жыл бұрын
Imagine the financial burden becomes too much and they want to sell the puppies to Cruella, but she no longer wants them because it's out of style
@lfkkkfk8623 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aoHTaZ6njbmcaKs
@DarkPsychoMessiah3 жыл бұрын
@@lfkkkfk862 Stop spamming this merde
@joshuaharris30393 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of that robot chicken bit
@joshuaharris30393 жыл бұрын
@@Mooffgamesgamer close but the other one where the dogs he sold to Cruella
@Mooffgamesgamer3 жыл бұрын
@@joshuaharris3039 Oh, this one lol kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIayYn6fhJ6ha8U
@alexthetiger78063 жыл бұрын
I loved this series when I was a kid. Watched the original 1961 film nonstop, and the live action, and even Patch's London Adventure The 102 Dalmatians Puppies To The Rescue video game was my shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
@TheJudge73 жыл бұрын
Theory idea: In the Princess Bride, they use a torture device called “The Machine.” According to the six fingered man, it takes off one year of your life per every setting. How would that work? Also how did Wesley only end up as mostly dead instead of fully dead, and how did the whole revival work?
@calebcostrini3 жыл бұрын
Disney be like: "Ah yes, the perfect character to give an empowering feminist backstory."
@magdalenomartinezjr88053 жыл бұрын
Everyone with common sense: she's an iconic villain! Not a role model for feminists!
@shinigamimiroku37233 жыл бұрын
@@magdalenomartinezjr8805 Sadly, we've long since left common sense behind...
@RX-eq7ye3 жыл бұрын
@@magdalenomartinezjr8805 shes not iconic just disgusting
@magdalenomartinezjr88053 жыл бұрын
@@shinigamimiroku3723 yeah, up to the point where Twitter likes burn everything to cinders (anime, doodles, etc)
@magdalenomartinezjr88053 жыл бұрын
@@RX-eq7ye ?
@OfficialTrainzGod3 жыл бұрын
Theory for Film theory: How much damage expenses were racked up during the train scenes of the movie titled "The Lone Ranger"?
@SliceJosiah3 жыл бұрын
Hmmmm
@escapefr0mslender3 жыл бұрын
Oh god that’d take a long time
@mohammadajmal877 Жыл бұрын
When I watch the videos, the things I learned about them. That’s exactly what I do. I tell my friends and they’re devastated.
@hottopic36223 жыл бұрын
I READ THE BOOK OF HER ORIGIN STORY AND HOLY CRAP, it’s screwed the frick up, she has the perfect villain origin story-
@nathi0602003 жыл бұрын
Explain.
@chrisrue74823 жыл бұрын
Explain
@theblaze55303 жыл бұрын
Explain
@getalife56503 жыл бұрын
Explain.
@_jamil.pk_3 жыл бұрын
Subscribe me plss
@DipsyKoo3 жыл бұрын
I went "awwwww" when I learned that they adopted the abused cat that I had never heard of ❤️
@juanmanuelpenaloza92643 жыл бұрын
I guess back then people would think it's a risky decision, but there's so many homes in Texas with cats and dogs that it doesn't even phase me anymore. Guess the two were ahead of their times.
@joeelliott48203 жыл бұрын
Mat pac: hey can you think of a theory for cruella: Film theory: no lets still it for after hours
@SingingSealRiana3 жыл бұрын
Well, Cruella is so cruel that even in "Twisted" there is no excuse for her while the oher disney villains get all to explain how they are not really evil after all ^^ I love Team Starkid for those musicals ^^
@megang59063 жыл бұрын
AAAAAH STARKID YAY
@SingingSealRiana3 жыл бұрын
@@megang5906 ^^
@steve_the_vehicon6323 жыл бұрын
I think Roger's music career took care of the dalmatian plantation, he got his song about cruella on the radio at the end
@SareshaTV3 жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t say Anita gave Cruella the idea of turning the puppies into fur coats. She used her dog as inspiration for her design. Cruella was the one who decided to make the Dalmatians into fur coats.
@_jamil.pk_3 жыл бұрын
Subscribe me plss
@ojanhensem31243 жыл бұрын
She literally said the fur is softer if it's from puppies so yeah...
@kamikelly39083 жыл бұрын
@@ojanhensem3124 cruella asked, she was asking what she thought was an innocent question
@VforVendettas3 жыл бұрын
@@kamikelly3908 I don't know, those questions were very odd and pointed. Plus Anita should know Cruella pretty well, considering their long acquaintance.
@allaboutthatbass60352 жыл бұрын
There was so much Disney had to explain with the cruelly movie. For starters, Cruella gave Anita and Roger the original two dogs. Not to mention Anita and Cruella were friends. So why would she take the dogs from her friend? There’s so much more after where the story ends and it just never got explained Edit: also, to get that fur she’d have to be very careful but couldn’t she just shave the fur?
@markuop3 жыл бұрын
You wouldn’t need 101 grooming supplies, you can use the same tools to groom every dog. :)