Sky Sabre: Up close with the Army's new air defence system

The new Sky Sabre system brings together data from the British Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, as well as being able and can hit a tennis ball-sized object travelling at the speed of sound.
The Army's 16 Regiment Royal Artillery has welcomed Sky Sabre, which is a replacement of the Rapier missile system.
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: forces.net
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: www.instagram....
Twitter: / forcesnews

[@loki76]

Nice system. I see it's using the Swedish SAAB "Giraffe" radar system. Britain and Sweden have a lot of military manufacturing together with BAE and SAAB and Thales etc. That NLAW is a joint Swedish-British anti-tank weapon. I hope Sweden procure some of this.. Ukraine war has shown Anti-air defense is critical.

[@intruder313]

And I hope Sweden joins us in NATO now that Russia has proven it's a psychotic aggressor that really can't be trusted at all!

[@gooner72]

They do indeed, mate. We have similar needs, a similar mindset, are both very clever and inventive, are both very resourceful and both punch WELL ABOVE our weight in terms of size of our Countries and military power. 🇬🇧🇸🇪✌✌

[@nikkibouttell3232]

@@gooner72 we obviously have realised this system is good and we can also Provide money and knowledge to make it better than it was. As long as it defends me and my family I don’t care what country produces it 😊

[@Redmanticore]

has to stop those grad missiles some way >;)

[@welshe222]

@@Redmanticore Grad has an effective max range of 37km.. This thing intercepts at 120km lol

[@bobthebomb1596]

Now we need a mobile, land based version of the ASTER/Samson system from the Type 45.

[@ThatCarGuy]

A lot of newer missiles coming out with the "sky" title almost got this confused for the US Sky Hunter. I guess "sky- whatever" just sounds cool haha.

[@ThatCarGuy]

@Varangian Guard Yeah seems to be a popular title. Sky Viper by Northrop Grumman as well lol.

[@fod1855]

Maybe SkyNet will be next 😂

[@Bigmoneeey]

That’s the direction they go

[@TT-hd3zi]

@@fod1855 Skynet is a British military satellite communications network :)

[@fod1855]

@@TT-hd3zi oh god someone should be sacked for that haha

[@joeoreilly_35]

It’s being deployed in the eastern flank of Poland defence secretary ben Wallace just announced

[@bigmatthews666]

I would take the range numbers with a grain of salt. Range is sometimes determined as effective range vs certain types of targets. Air to air missiles can travel 200 miles and take out a slow moving cargo plane, but the range to take out a fast jet would be significantly less as the missile loses energy the further it travels - even ramjet after a certain point

[@davidhouseman4328]

You also have a British convention of "+", they'll often understate by saying something like 25km+ instead of 40km. It all means public stated ranges don't mean that much.

[@Cravendale98]

@@davidhouseman4328 From what I read, it was reported by Janes Defence that the Camm missile actually flew 60km in trials. Although if true this is likely to be a maximum range in perfect conditions, effective range would probably be much less, but it does give you a good indication the range is definitely more than 25km.

[@quincg1288]

Thanks for that General Matthews👍🏾

[@michaelkavanagh5947]

From Britain with love.

[@shinkoreancookery952]

Now that’s what I like to see! 👍👍

[@milgeekmedia]

Interesting that the UK has moved units of Skysabre into the east of Poland where it's coverage easily extends into the west of the Ukraine!

[@rutherfordclan5693]

WOAH that just upped and turned left on a dime.... That is freaking awesome

[@rutherfordclan5693]

@Ryan Davies I did not know that

[@Jin-Ro]

I still think we should commission a long range system. Allow Sky Sabre to mop up those that get through. A lot to be said for multi layered defence. This seems "Eggs all in one basket" to me, or as the Americans say "Betting the farm on it"

[@soph1823]

We probably will commission one at some point, especially with the escalating tensions

[@glennhearn401]

thats one nice bit of kit

[@stoufer2000]

wow, that certainly looks pretty impressive. some pretty impressive calculations going on to control that lot at once... I wonder at what sort of range the missiles own guidance takes over...

[@ThatCarGuy]

It's a short range fire and forget missile, it only has a 25km range. You can add course corrections though through its data link. It's meant as a last ditch if all other longer range SAMs fail.

[@Louis-ej1lx]

Longest range SAM the army has operated ever.

[@davidhouseman4328]

@@ThatCarGuy it's not a back up to long range SAMs, it's a back up to jets.

[@TT-hd3zi]

@@davidhouseman4328 depends, jets don’t do much against cruise or ballistic missiles.

[@davidhouseman4328]

@@TT-hd3zi it doesn't depend in that we don't have a long range SAM system for it to be back up to. More generally the longer range SAMs may have utility against ballistic missiles but also have issues with cruise missile due to them low flying, and given the extra cost they are likely a worse option than something like sky sabre.

[@AtheistOrphan]

The presentation would have been a bit more impressive had the launcher been filled with some drill rounds rather than completely empty.

[@1chish]

I guess there are some things they don't want to show up close to the press. And they did show the same missile firing off a T23.

[@ElyasBinYahya]

So very advanced

[@jackbruce6053]

Do you have 15 around every city in uk and Scotland?

[@kickboxerforever00]

"The enemy cannot push a button, IF you disable his hand" Sgt Zim (Starship troopers).

[@orangejjay]

Ehhhh ... a button is a type of switch. We have plenty of ways to "press" a switch that don't require human limbs.

[@Andy-zs7bw]

Which cost less, CAMM or MICA? Many countries still pick MICA even though CAMM already is available & even though French surface forces don't even use MICA

[@johnnygreenshirt6215]

Who's here after hearing that the UK will deploy its Sabre anti-air missile systems to Nato ally Poland, along with 100 troops.

[@youtubeboxing719]

This is got no chance , russia has way better air Defence systems hence why they were struggling for air superiority because Ukraine has their old BUK and S-300 Soviet systems which are way better than this, they should’ve reverse engineered t he s-300 and made it better to try to rival the s-400 this system has no chance just like the crappy SAM systems and the iron dome that failed against home made rockets in the Gaza war , russia has the best air Defence and missile technology it’s only evened out by our superiority in AirPower with jets like f-22 and f-16’s but even then they are slowly catching up

[@hilarymiseroy3251]

@@youtubeboxing719 As Russians are incapable of telling the truth about anything then I'm quite sure they have a fraction of the stuff they pretend to have.

[@hilarymiseroy3251]

100 troops indicates 2 Batteries.

[@youtubeboxing719]

Hilary Miseroy yeah and the ghost of Kiev is real lol

[@youtubeboxing719]

Hilary Miseroy the fact that they supplied the technology to many countries already and have already used it in Ukraine and set a world record with the distance of the interception is hilarious but you do you and make sure you take your booster shot and scream slava Ukraine 3 times a day at the least good luck freedom man

[@waynewayoaveyard9397]

key detail here - what is the smallest target they would shoot at = cruise missile. smallest...

[@liverpoolscottish6430]

Oddly enough, there aren't many wpn systems which are the size of tennis balls currently. A cruise missile is smaller than an aircraft- so obviously, that's the most likely smallest tgt the system would be used to engage.

[@waynewayoaveyard9397]

​@@TheCoolCucumber tf are you on about? 😂 when i said key detail i ment anything above a 20ft cruise missile is fairgame, meaning...the 28ft brahmos hypersonic missiles might have being a focuse for developing such a system. - what was that again about a key detail i misunderstood?

[@waynewayoaveyard9397]

​@@liverpoolscottish6430 you are backwards if you think for one moment that aircrafts are the focuse of this system. you may want to read my reply to the other person who also thought he was smart.

[@tomlee3412]

🇬🇧 this is a grate upgrade to our defence systems

[@dovidell]

great/ grate ?!!!!!!!

[@2.Cuzzzz]

The giraffe is a swedish design made by Saab it’s not BrITish

[@mostevil1082]

​@@2.Cuzzzz CAMM, the missile system here is ASRAAM based which is a British system. Thankfully Sweeden isn't as petty and jingoistic as yourself and is happy to integrate with this system and save the cost of developing a new search radar.

[@EuropeukAndrussia]

Use magnetic proximity fuse in the missile instead of laser fuse

[@nathankaye1577]

Public don't realise that these are actually all over the UK. Most around London. And Nuclear Power Stations. And thier are 3 other systems in Combat Rediness around the UK for 'Life Grids'.

[@henriettalondon6141]

Ukraine needs it desperately. Save Ukraine!

[@philthai99]

Very interesting.

[@Osama-Bon-Jovi-01]

Very cool

[@AtheistOrphan]

All very good but can they get it into the shops in time for Christmas?🎄

[@gondorianboy92]

Thanks for sending them to Poland. We are in huge need for AA systems in case of Russian agression.

[@ParallelComparison]

I heard Poland have their own home made air defense systems

[@gondorianboy92]

@@ParallelComparison yes, one of the best ones literally production launched a year ago it's called "Piorun" or in English simply "Thunder". It's previous previous version ("Grom") shot down in Georgia something like 12 Russian planes. We gave the new ones to Ukrainians in like few hundreds of them and I strongly believe those few shots downs from yesterday may be the outcome, at least partially. Even states bought big batch (up to 1000 systems?) of it. But there is one simple disadvantage - once effective this is only 2 men used, very short range system (I think up to 6 km). We don't have medium range and long system AA defence in Poland whatsoever (under development , they bought some Patriots but in such quantity that Russian saturation attack would wipe it out). It's simply expensive as hell, highly advanced and long lasting to produce such capabilities so even if you borrow it for time being it's a huge help and increases potential Russian blood cost by a degree.

[@MostlyPennyCat]

@@gondorianboy92 Never buy off the Americans, it's always too expensive. Either buy off MBDA (like the CAMM system in this video) or, get in there with MBDA making a SAM system in conjunction.

[@gondorianboy92]

@@MostlyPennyCat everybody knows it but I believe it was forced on our government as a package with the Americans troops to stay locally.

[@stewartread4235]

We can hit 8 targets at once, that's why we put 8 missiles on the rack...genius level...we got the bestest army ever...so proud.

[@WillyJunior]

What? At no point does he say that.

[@WillyJunior]

He's just saying where the 8 missiles are, then he says they can either be used for 8 individual targets or multiple missiles can be used for one target.

[@stewartread4235]

@@WillyJunior quote "it can fire 8 missiles at one target, obviously we have 8 missiles on the flat rack". Doh..!!

[@WillyJunior]

@@stewartread4235 Keep nit-picking mate, whatever makes you happy.

[@stewartread4235]

@@WillyJunior seems your knit picking, I was having a laugh..jeez..!!

[@EuropeukAndrussia]

To solve thechnical difficulty please follow this procedure

[@Shanetangybits]

Britain should look at the otomatic turret mated to surplus challenger 2 hulls (if they havent been gas axed). Drone killer, shore bombardment, rapid fire light anti armour, light indirect fire. Once you have that then a marinised version as a ciws in complement to the 57mm.

[@MH5XXXX]

Nice weapon.

[@vitaliyvyntu4566]

Hello from Ukraine

[@justonecornetto80]

Greetings and salutations from the UK!! Long live Ukraine!

[@-NOCAP-]

I was in the process of reading the CC that did " can destroy aircraft, drones, and laser guided smart bombs" when the guy started talking again saying "The smallest thing we would usually shoot at is a cruise missile". Those statements don't really match up.

[@obliviouz]

"Usually". Cruise missiles are high value and high risk enough, and maneuverable enough that you'd need an interceptor like this. Other targets can be more cost effectively dealt with.

[@-NOCAP-]

@@obliviouz the comment went right over your head. In one sentence he's talking about using the weapons to intercept small drones and laser-guided bombs, but then he follows that up by saying the smallest thing that they would intercept with the weapon is a cruise missile. Which contradicts his earlier statement since cruise missiles are huge.

[@obliviouz]

@@-NOCAP- No, actually I think it's the reverse. I emphasised "usually" from the quote because that's what made the difference. Example: "My car can go fastest 200mph, but the fastest I usually go is 60mph." "Usually" is a statement about frequency, not capability limits.

[@goldenlabradorskye]

My lab is called sky.....she intercepts squirrels and cats

[@johnnycrinkle]

Could she catch a gerbil, doing twice the speed of sound tho?

[@philipadderley]

i know rapier and blindfire are antiquated, but it looks a lot less "agile" than a rapier/blindfire system...

[@greva2904]

How on earth can you tell that just from a PC generated promo vid?

[@philipadderley]

@@greva2904 rapier and blind fire you can haul around on a couple of land rovers this thing looks like it needs a couple of 18 wheelers to haul it around. Rapier and blind fire could hide in a large thicket this thing would need the new forest to conceal itself

[@philipmichaelswales3351]

Rapier is outdated, ok for when it saw time in service as SHORAD but not effective in todays Air Defence.

[@EuropeukAndrussia]

Good to see GB another time powerful by sky saber

[@petermclennan6781]

Egregious large font titles obscure the high quality imagery, provide no useful additional information.

[@YouNeedM3]

These should be set up in the sea or a small boat to help defend any incoming missiles

[@DavidWhelbourn]

What the heck is going on with the Beret badge? I'm amazed it was allowed to be so low. Our BSM would have ripped it up LOL

[@richstarx]

How will it do agsinst a Blitz type attack?

[@PpAirO5]

Lance Bombardier of the Royal Artillery called: SAM 😂👍

[@saintking5598]

Can a REME go for this course?

[@tophodonthetrowel4730]

Well done boys money well spent 👏 roll on the type 26's rule Britania 🇬🇧

[@gazzergizmo]

Awesome

[@stuartmiddleton1972]

How many are we buying? Can we deploy in the UK for home defence while supporting overseas deployment? Will all of the UK strategic home targets be defended while these are deployed overseas to protect expeditionary forces?

[@ENGBriseB]

There's over 25 in the UK with more being built. Its similar to the Sea Ceptor missile system that's being fitted to Royal Navy's ship's.

[@stuartmiddleton1972]

@@ENGBriseB is that enough? Are they theatre , regional or local air defence?I just think what they are meant to do. What covers them for the home defence?

[@rago8594]

@@stuartmiddleton1972 The system is newly develop 2021 commisioned? So as the production is not like candy you made and chew.

[@stuartmiddleton1972]

@@rago8594 Hi, I know it is still being deployed but my point was how many systems are being procured? `there is no point in having great air defence for our forward deployed assets but leaving our home assets (ports, bases, airfields, energy systems etc.) totally undefended. UK has never taken home defence seriously and we can't suddenly magic 100 systems into place overnight. We also only have a few Type 45 destroyers so they won't be available to make up the gaps. The RAF has very few fighters so we can't rely on those. And if the airbases are wiped out we won't even have that.

[@James-zt7nf]

Amazing

[@pdarley58]

Funny CAMM used to stand for Common Anti-air Modular Missile !!

[@SUPERSCIENCE01]

It would be better if it could fire on the move like the TOR-M1 that it's trying to imitate.

[@joem1256]

The Missile is the same as the ASRAAM, so perhaps we could see a smaller mobile setup like the old Chaparral or the modified Boeing SHORAD turret that can hold 2 AIM9X's on one side. Combine with one of the RADA radar sets and there you go.

[@judahclough3701]

You guys should create weapons that could neutralize nukes

[@MarkoCoomo]

When you're asked to talk about a system but can't give away any of the classified data! Hah. Looks quality.

[@ENGBriseB]

There's a new video out there. Sky Sabre vs. S400 on what you're watching.

[@kcuzz4091]

Nice!

[@candidocadalzo2923]

Qué Gran Tecnología Porque ya las Guerras de Hoy Día Son de Tecnologías de Punta Como Éstas. Bendiciones.

[@WormsHere]

Nice system, but too limited in numbers to be of any use.

[@frodobaggins3974]

Can it intercept hypersonic missiles though?

[@stuartdowling5984]

8 systems with just 1 8tube launcher dose not cut it these days

[@oicfas4523]

1:32 Dang, why did they cut away from the cute lance bombardier ☺️.

[@harrysoper7173]

is it just me or is that RADAR tiny for an engagment RADAR in comparison the patriot or S400

[@davidhouseman4328]

It's not just you, it's much smaller, which fits with it not being a long range system like the two you mentioned.

[@ENGBriseB]

It's better than the S400 as the Polish has just bought one.

[@TheB1nary]

How does this system defend its own position? How does it stack up against the Russian air defence systems? Looks like an improvement though!

[@tomlee3412]

🇬🇧 Sky saber can target 8 threats with 360 direction fire can take down threats from all direction

[@samble3544]

The radar can detect Anti-radiation misslies, i.e missiles which target the radar. It can also detect and engage both cruise and ARM missiles but only has Medium/short capability (up tpo 25km). Russia has a very capable long range air defence system called S-500 which has an operational range of 600km however these are clearly two very different Air defence systems which fulfill different air defence roles.

[@ThatCarGuy]

It's a short range system, it protects itself, basically meant as a last resort if other long range missiles fail. It's max range is 25km(the ER version 45km range with some saying up to 60km) which makes it similar to the US NASAMs meant to protect high value targets. It's also similar to the Russian TOR missile system.

[@timmurphy5541]

@Drew Peacock Perhaps Aster 30 missiles from a Type 45 destroyer or longer range systems provided by NATO allies such as the US or Germany. The UK doesn't have a longer range missile system - I suppose that combat aircraft are the "long range" option for the UK.

[@ThatCarGuy]

@Drew Peacock Aster 30, Samp/t, etc.

[@Harrysound]

Coming to a Poland near you soon

[@peterthermocline]

Send them to Ukraine.

[@dovidell]

maybe that's where the system will be battle tested , I hope it doesn't play up like Windows 10 when THAT first came out !!!!

[@kierrenere]

Stuff that. Keep them here for our protection. These bad boys need to stay put

[@someguyfromarcticfreezer6854]

Starstreak will arrive, it is much better than Stinger missiles, twice the range, mach 4 speed and can't be stopped by flares and electronic counter measures.

[@SK-ko8dr]

@@kierrenere Fine, thn send Rapier to Ukraine.

[@eyeofthetiger6002]

You don't want to send the latest kits to Ukraine in case in they fall into Russian hands.

[@deltic5514]

How old was that Lt Col. At least he doesn't have to worry about shaving.

[@MultiDwd]

You know you are getting old when half colonels look young?

[@Andyb2379]

But can you pick up Sky history channel on that thing during down time?

[@trumanhw]

Just TUNE IT FOR J-20s, Su-27, Su-30, Su-35. It's got bettah chonce to hit tha tawget? Yeah? Mean like, it flies at the intercept vs turning the entire time? Bravo, mate

[@philipadderley]

i'm sure there's a spare plate on that giant wagon they could lob one of those goal keepers on it so it could defend itself... ;-)

[@pdarley58]

Better name than Land or SeaCepter!!!

[@barreiros5077]

La curvatura de la tierra en un tiro (no parabolico) a mach 12 10... Que Ves?

[@bees1664]

You'd think a Lt. Col. would get the name of the missile right? Well think again

[@Phil_AKA_ThundyUK]

Double the order.

[@seanw8476]

The missle has to be pointy. - Admiral General Aladeen.

[@errornamenotfound2513]

As a standalone vehicle, how does Land Ceptor/Sky Sabre scans and engage targets?

[@Alpha_0ne276]

It doesn't - it needs the giraffe radar to function

[@errornamenotfound2513]

@@Alpha_0ne276 nah, i did some research a long time ago about this, it can indeed be operated as a standalone vehicle. However, it can only track targets not scan. Meaning, u have to manually look for targets with your own. "But how"? Land Ceptor has a built in optical tracker than can track targets on its own. The optical mass is folded when a radar vehicle is in place

[@Alpha_0ne276]

@@errornamenotfound2513 Oh, cool, so is that basically using an IRST track system?

[@dragonback6075]

Another very useful piece of kit *that* could be saving lives in Ukraine now!

[@1gutek]

W czwartek, 17.03.2022 brytyjski minister obrony Ben Wallace przekazał, że w Polsce będzie rozmieszczony system Sky Sabre.

[@APT1066]

How did tht Lance bombardier pass Comms vetting 😅

[@huzary1092]

So, the UK gets this new weapon. New carriers, New fighter plane, better tanks, better or new armored vehicles etc. etc. The UK is doing the right thing. Is that because they left the EU? Then we in the Netherlands should leave tomorrow.

[@ieuanjones7615]

No it's likely just due to geopolitical tensions rising in the last decade as well as the need to keep up with military tech

[@davidhouseman4328]

Anything we are getting now like this or the carriers is a prebrexit decision, military projects take time. We'll see in a decade what Brexit brings. Generally though the military constantly get news kit and updates, it not really that special.

[@huzary1092]

@@ieuanjones7615 ........I know. 🙂

[@justonecornetto80]

There's a lot of defence co-operation between the UK and the Netherlands at the moment. A Dutch frigate was part of the maiden deployment of the HMS Queen Elizabeth carrier strike group to the South China sea and Dutch marines were training with the Royal marines as part of the Littoral response group on a huge exercise with the US marines in California recently. All this would indicate that your military chiefs are looking for some ideas on how to improve things. As for leaving the EU, come and join us! The air smells cleaner out here!

[@davidhouseman4328]

@@justonecornetto80 This isn't just at the moment. The Dutch and Royal Marines have a very close relationship in particular but you've also seen things like the perisher sub course where the Netherlands took over the conventional sub part when we went all nuclear.

[@DDuMas]

At least we finally have a decent air defence system. I wasn't particularly confident with the Rapier.

[@ShredCo]

"More lethal and safer."

[@Twirlyhead]

Well _I_ knew what he meant.

[@ShredCo]

@@Twirlyhead Yeah, it just sounded odd.

[@Twirlyhead]

@@ShredCo Yep, it did. 😊

[@MrSuthatThinsopa]

Yeah sccan scan

[@Twirlyhead]

Great cost savings could be achieved if we had these made in China and asked them not to copy any of the tech or tell their military about it.

[@gayleralan]

The old one looked better

[@ENGBriseB]

Yeah more Thunderbirds.

[@rkenny8399]

Just hope this machine can stop putins nukes!

[@Fester_]

I want to get me one of those for Christmas. !

[@dovidell]

.......gift wrapped in Khaki camouflage ?!!!

[@firehazzard8497]

@@dovidell good luck trying to find it

[@vwduiven3072]

Does this system also works againts the satan 2 missle?

[@henriettalondon6141]

there is no system in the world in any country which can give a 100%protection against nucs. nor anyone wants to check it.

[@RobinPhillips1957]

124 km would be OTHR! Sat link?

[@kit888]

Flying missiles are over the horizon.

[@5T3-d3c]

ENGLANDS GLORY SHALL NEVER DIE

[@AtheistOrphan]

Isn’t that a brand of matches?

[@5T3-d3c]

@@AtheistOrphan Yes but dont tell anyone

[@ENGBriseB]

UK defense not England.

[@5T3-d3c]

@@AtheistOrphan WE LIGHT THE WAY

[@DCO-3447]

Flat cap with the badge on the leather band ?

[@MultiDwd]

Hmm...nine mile snipers etc :)

[@nathanruben3372]

wnat is altitude and range limitations.

[@Saint_Vincent1735]

Bang stick was the other name they considered.

[@blackmantis3130]

It can't stop hypersonic missiles though.

[@ENGBriseB]

Yes it can hypersonic missiles Lazar guided smart missiles.

[@AlexDeLarge77]

He used the word “savings” multiple times. Don’t like that at all. I want the best equipment and if it cost it costs.

[@hsdsaunders]

13 years of Tory rule

[@liverpoolscottish6430]

SHINY KIT ALERT!!

[@davey2363]

The words Sky and Space seems to be in military vogue today; a common colloquial vocabulary. Silly and trendy.

[@behindenemylines.3103]

Talk is cheap.Does it actually works or is it for some people to get rich from.

[@moa3008]

Give this air defense missile system to the Ukrainian military now before its to late!

[@Troops-y6h]

they are getting them now :)

[@dvkalinin]

Very limited range. Not capable for HyperSonic. Looks like a 1990 but not 2020

[@JammyDodger45]

Why does it need to be hypersonic? And the range is no issue at all, it's a medium point defence system easily capable of covering the Polish border from it's deployed location. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@dvkalinin]

Specification says that it is effective from 1 to 25km only (though they had some results achieved at 60km). I don’t mind if it suits the purpose. I was just saying that my expectations from something released in 2020 we’re higher

[@jimpickins7900]

@@dvkalinin Not the type of munition we're worrying about, rather defend against 14 jets, drones, laser guided bombs, missiles than 2 of those plus hypersonics

[@dvkalinin]

❗️On March 18, the Kinzhal aviation missile system with hypersonic aeroballistic missiles destroyed a large underground warehouse of missiles and aviation ammunition of Ukrainian troops in the village of Delyatyn, Ivano-Frankivsk region - Russian Defense Ministry

[@JammyDodger45]

@@dvkalinin - yeah I'm going to ignore anything coming out of the Russian State.

[@philedmonds1901]

Now everyone knows, nothing to worry about then?

[@londonroulette]

It’s a bit big, so easy to hit and destroy by the enemy?

[@alexandriaoccasional-corte1346]

Next AA-System: SKY BURIAL

[@georgeadams3954]

Thanks UK forces.

[@RaymondStarr007]

You might be using this in Kiev very soon

[@EuropeukAndrussia]

Long live Vikings

[@lastprophet9904]

Sounds good Does not work