Getting the Picture

[@pchelloo]

Hey plaintiff: There's NO such thing as *"Free."* The price is ALWAYS hidden somewhere in the price of the item(s). I'm glad you won your case. The defendant needs to get educated in his field of expertise. Also, the defendant's "emergencies" are unfortunate but they are NOT the problem of the customer! The customer is the employer. The hired business becomes the employee. The employer never has to put up with the employees emergencies. Ever.

[@BobBlumenfeld]

Yeah. I suspect the transmitters came six to a pack and the defendant chose to make believe the plaintiff didn't pay for all six.

[@trekgirl65]

Defendant needs to do back to tech school. Lower pixels lowers the quality of the pictures taken by the camera.

[@GummyBearWA]

He gets to sell the equipment again and not have to pay the judgement. Win-Win!

[@BobBlumenfeld]

He does have to pay the judgement. TPC does not pay them any more. Check out this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4vblaRoftqDb7c

[@N_Frazier]

Doug is so shady & condescending. He’s messy, always tries to pit litigants against one another & often cut them off after asking a question. 🤣

[@lolamaude3449]

You will never make me believe a 2 pixel camera would have good clear viewing. 5 pixel, 2 pixel.... no comparison.

[@ohsuellen]

DANG, My cheap AMICCOM cameras from Amazon work great! I installed them myself in under an hour for all 5 cameras.

[@cbro2807]

"I don't think I was given opportunity to speak..." Naw, man. You said enough.

[@msfranklin2650]

THAT'S RIGHT SEE THE PLAINTIFF WAS PREPARED GREAT TEXT MESSAGES SO THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO DISPUTING THE DEFENDANT HAD NO IDEA OF WHAT HE WAS DOING THEN HAD THE NERVE TO LOOK STUPID WHEN HE WAS ORDERED TO GIVE THE PLAINTIFF A FULL REFUND AS HE SHOULD

[@BobBlumenfeld]

Plaintiff says the defendant "used the same cables" for the wired system. Those were probably power cables, as wireless is by definition, "wireless," but may still use house electricity.

[@michelehemlokhexwhite4310]

Exactly

[@Childfree334]

Happy Friday Everyone 😉🍷

[@theresadimaggio7241]

Happy Friday 🍸

[@theresadimaggio7241]

🙏😎

[@pinkyshoes22]

Happy Friday 🌞🌺

[@GrumpySmurf0813]

Happy Friday

[@susanstribe4914]

Happy Friday 🥂

[@RumbleRish]

The losing side always wants to claim “they didn’t let me give speak much…” WHAT could you have said that would’ve changed the verdict? The plaintiff fulfilled his obligation (paying) and the defendant didn’t (never got a full-functioning security camera system b/c he couldn’t get the motion-activated feature to work [within a reasonable amount of time]). Defendant didn’t dispute those facts so it’s a pretty simple cut-n-dry contracts case….

[@lorrainegaughan3317]

Right!!!

[@PhilipOII247]

Funny how people in the comment become sideline lawyers. Weak.

[@RumbleRish]

@@PhilipOII247 Even funnier how some of us in the comments section actually *are* lawyers. Weak!!

[@PhilipOII247]

@@RumbleRish Bahahahah! Rriigghhtttt...🙄 You sound 12.

[@RumbleRish]

@@PhilipOII247 okay Philip instead of personal statements, why don’t YOU tell me what the defendant here could’ve said that would’ve made a difference?? Pllllease inform us on what else is relevant to this contracts dispute. Looking forward to your reply!

[@chuck9380]

I have “Ring” cameras and doorbell and it works a lot better than the ones this guy tried to install for a lot less

[@ashleypatten2304]

The cheap comes out expensive is soooo true, as JM said. I have experienced that more than I would like to admit.

[@BobBlumenfeld]

There's a reason 2 megapixel systems are cheaper than 5 megapixel systems: The images aren't the same quality. Period.

[@lescobrandon9693]

This is a common problem. It’s the result of weak wifi. Most techs will try to use wifi extenders and place them near the cameras to boost the signal. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t.

[@dennisranck1613]

I totally agree. If the customer has got weak wi-fi, that would explain why the first camera system was intermittent. Though, the second camera system was hardline, and I do not understand why it was intermittent.

[@arianefr78]

The defendant installed a cheaper version of equipment the second time, although claiming he ate half the cost, how can a cheaper version cost more? He was shady from the start and should not be charging professional prices, when he is an amateur...

[@BobBlumenfeld]

The "NVR" is a receiver, not a transmitter. Slip of the tongue by the defendant?

[@Channel-JJ]

I don't think it was a slip. I think he did a youtube course or helped a neighbor then decided to start a business.

[@BobBlumenfeld]

@@Channel-JJ Quite possible.

[@dennisranck1613]

So, I do have a comment, although it is not camera related. I ended up running Cat 5 cables through my entire house, and through my sisters house. I told her, that she would not be using everything on Wi-Fi, it all needs to be hard lined. Especially, if you are streaming. This goes for the hard line cameras, the defendant did mention hikvision, which as I am recalling, is a Poe camera. Which is why I do not understand the plaintiff saying that the second camera system was intermittent.

[@Childfree334]

It seems that most people today want a Rolex on a Timex budget. Doesn't work that way. Quality costs money. As someone who put in a top notch home security/surveillance system from ADT, I have to say it hurt my wallet for a couple of months, but in the long run it was completely worth it. I had 2 claims of people saying they were injured on my property. Guess what the hidden security cameras showed, in crystal clear HD quality may I add. Insurance companies love customers like me. 😂

[@alyssahamlett]

There's no excuse not to have em these days u can get 4k quality camera w 2 way talking recording ect foe 30-40$ on Amazon as long as u have wifi it's not that expensive.

[@RumbleRish]

Your last bit is a good point! I wonder if home insurance companies give discounts for having security cameras or offer any contribution towards them🤔. Might have to look into it

[@dommy7077]

Installer just should have bought better quality equipment. It seems the plaintiff was willing to spend some money.

[@so-bright-i-cant-see3856]

Who was it that said never trust a man with 2 first names? Lol

[@Channel-JJ]

I'm curious about his relationship with his neighbor that referred Johnny 2 meg.

[@lollypop2310]

Shoot just get a google doorbell camera. That’s what I have and it works great lol..

[@NellieKAdaba]

Alright.

[@johnnyb6151]

When she says watch this she's Q-ing the litigant to lie most times.

[@noneyab7011]

So he had to pay more money, for worse quality cameras???? The Plaintiff paid for a working system, and didn’t get it.

[@victoriadove3363]

Pay the plantiff.... period

[@yung1717]

That question is dumb lol. What would be the point of a jury if the judge could override it if they felt like it

[@prairierider7569]

I hope everyone has an excellent weekend, may that be by the beach or skiing! See ya next week

[@theresadimaggio7241]

Happy Friday 🍸

[@judieversaul4274]

I don't understand why he or anyone else would need all those cameras to watch. Paranoid? 😳

[@RumbleRish]

Perhaps he has a big property. 5-6 cameras doesn’t seem like much - 2 for front yard/garage, 1 for backyard, 1 on each side…

[@trekgirl65]

Ever had your house broken into, and live in a bad crime neighborhood? Try it sometime.

[@judieversaul4274]

@@trekgirl65 I had my car stolen outside my house, still do not have a camera, refuse to become paranoid. Life happens.

[@keithkemp3008]

Hopefully the installer learned a lesson that if someone want cheap than don't take the job !!

[@KA-ey9sc]

Happy Friday 🧋

[@ch1701a]

I use Amcrest Camera products. 8 Megapixel cameras. 16 channel NVR's.

[@KennuhWayne]

Can someone help me understand the Nov. 10th text from the defendant that said somethingto the effect "it hasn't been 8 days...it's been 4 days"? That was clearly 8 days (Nov 2nd to Nov 8th). Or am I tripping?

[@rogertaylor7433]

November 4th, then to November 8th...

[@KennuhWayne]

@@rogertaylor7433 Oh so he's trying to calculate the day he was supposed to go into the tech support office instead of the day the problem was reported. So slimy.

[@rogertaylor7433]

@@KennuhWayne....yup...Exactly.

[@hutchu1]

Why didn’t the guy just go with rain

[@adrianprince7266]

This defendant didn't know what he was doing in installing the camera system. If I were the plantiff I would've been as upset and perturbed as he was. He deserves his money back because he never got a fully working camera system.

[@Childfree334]

He should have hired a reputable company then, not tried to go the cheap route.

[@laylathevirgo9907]

@@Childfree334 even if he went the cheap route he still should get something that works right !

[@Eswyfe]

Has this man not ever heard of the ring camera?

[@lindacallazo1818]

Exactly 🤦🏻‍♀️, I love mine

[@TopherGrant]

La barata sale cara

[@loralynart32]

this is why i hate wireless products..they suck big time

[@lashundavis156]

TGIF hey everybody

[@di1234kke3eks]

You can see the attached file is scanned image in PDF format PDF MMR the attached file is scanned image in

[@dllms]

end of the day the installers have no idea what his is doing . false advertising. than again . the plantiff when the cheap cheap route that’s ended up cause him more running around .

[@halimalger5894]

احذر الجندي 71

[@тумка-ы7д]

Gentle dolphin 74

[@santi-ll3dj]

Dirty snake 37

[@ТимурЛайф-з2и]

Ахахахаах

[@alariensuttle9195]

Second