Going Back in Time to Stop the Second Amendment - Key & Peele

[@samuelwallace2782]

"Gentlemen, imagine if someone were to invent a gun capable of firing hundreds of rounds in a minute" "Oh, sick! That sounds bad ass!"

[@BeaverChainsaw]

"Sounds like it will become a staple in the moving pictures industry!"

[@noneofyourbusiness9489]

That is pretty much what they would have said.

[@marienemozzarella8502]

A point of order !!!

[@THESLlCK]

They were already in existence back then, congress almost bought a bunch for the military

[@boyzzersbiggestfan]

@[[Eunsunglee ] I’m not saying you did, but do you think civilians actually purchase these?

[@JoshuaLotion]

I shot up a piece of paper, now everyone carries pulse rifles. Consequences.

[@emmanuelgoldstein2558]

Pulse rifles? FN2000 5.56mm bullpup. Design is like 20 years old...

[@derrickrobinson7269]

^ look at this high-and-mighty nerd

[@TG-ny3vv]

Kekw

[@emmanuelgoldstein2558]

@@derrickrobinson7269 nerd? I'm not the one talking about fucking pulse rifles lol

[@TheInsanitiesedge]

@@emmanuelgoldstein2558 he jus mad u beat em to the punch at pointing out what rifle it actually was lul.

[@jesuspreciado634]

"Pass me the quill let me draw it before i forget" LMFAO

[@jimmyphantom5572]

😂 Like every Mad H artist do Speed run with they drawing 😂

[@capame3737]

Weren't the founding fathers under 50? Of course, they're going to think this is pretty cool. We're going to be bad ass in the future 😅.

[@sirsmoothable]

This part 😂😂😂

[@Jerry-yr1en]

@@capame3737 then he will have to terminate them

[@mossfamily5455]

Key and Peele got it right. The Founders generation was actively trying to create firearms that could be fired multiple times. Almost all of them were amateur gunsmiths. They allowed personal ownership of canon. Someone showing up with an automatic would have excited them, not sent them into fearful spasms.

[@elizabethhenning778]

They probably would have thought twice about a pissed-off 18-year-old being able to walk out of a Walmart with one, though. And the Second Amendment doesn't say anything about an unrestricted right to own firearms as personal self-defense. "Shall not be infringed" doesn't mean what you think it does.

[@dudewatevs56]

​@@elizabethhenning778 James Madison's essays made it clear that he wrote "Shall not be infringed" means that no restrictions are allowed. The supreme court themselves came out and said that any and all firearm restrictions are unconstitutional, and should they be challenged in a federal court, then they (assuming the judge adheres to SCOTUS' ruling) will be shot down. This was not even a decision made by just Republican justices. There were members of both parties that were part of the majority. So please, tell me how you know more than the SCOTUS and James Madison himself.

[@elizabethhenning778]

@@dudewatevs56 This is absolutely false, both about James Madison and SCOTUS. There have ALWAYS been restrictions and it wasn't until the NRA turned into an extremist organization that anyone thought restrictions were categorically "unconstitutional"

[@reptiliangold15]

And they weren’t stupid, they knew technology would advance thats very obvious even though people are too stupid to understand what actual smart people are Just because they were from the 18th century doesn’t make them bumbling hicks

[@reptiliangold15]

@@elizabethhenning778this is one of the stupid people I was talking about for instance

[@noaht5269]

To think, there's still skits i haven't seen

[@curingyou]

@@xaex7711 ok mister xaex

[@DantheMcCoy]

@@xaex7711 what a sad clown

[@YungandRekless545]

@@xaex7711 if you think Kevin Hart is funnier than them, this comment is pretty much invalid

[@tylerjohnson4825]

didnt this come out today?

[@aktan4ik]

your dumb

[@jimmyscripts6557]

"I used the second amendment to destroy the second amendment"

[@bpurple7263]

kzbin.info/aero/PLZOMlO2_17fvIiTRFiQ9C2OqfGER03v4G I'd like to see your opinion on theese set of videos. I'll look for your coments under them"

[@eyelikehurdles]

I used the stones to destroy the stones!

[@jamaalsq8134]

Consequences!!

[@6Vex]

I USED THE STONES TO DESTROY THE STONES

[@KicksPregnantWomen]

this is why the second amendment is important

[@Blashmack]

At this point I'm convinced that the original run of Key & Peele is some kind of a paradox with an infinite number of sketches.

[@BeaverChainsaw]

well there are 5 whole seasons worth of skits with 10 episodes each season and at least 6 sketches in each episode.

[@Viper3048]

@@BeaverChainsaw But I've seen every season and they still post skits I haven't seen ALL THE TIME...

[@AaronPaulIbarrola]

Interdimentional Cable.

[@Scytherene122190]

Jesus fellas. We've been in quarantine for far too long. Wait...what?

[@maadtee6281]

@ADAM CARREON wtf are you actually stupid or something its because their skits are quality like Alternatio didn't spell his name correctly I think

[@josemendezfr]

First he's holding Mac-10's then the Founding Fathers were so impressed he litterally got upgraded to FN-2000's.

[@warweasel2832]

"""Upgraded"""

[@unzmpiti8147]

I expected some laser shit.

[@TheSundayShooter]

@@warweasel2832 Apart from concealability, it's an upgrade in every way

[@normankuebel7231]

Those are the original version of the CZ Scorpion

[@EstorilEm]

@@normankuebel7231No they aren’t, it’s a freaking bull pup haha - op was right, they’re FN-2000’s. They should have used PS90s though.

[@DailyDoseofShortsVideos]

Imagine having the budget of Key and Peele just for jokes

[@BobbyJ529]

that level of cg isn't hard to do these days. average person with a decent computer and some brains could pull that off after a few months of training.

[@emiraryaputra4900]

its not JUST cg, all the costume department, extras, props, set, film crew etc.

[@sharpnova2]

@@BobbyJ529 there is a lot more to their high production value than just cg, idiot

[@3boodae749]

jacindor j The type of cameras they use, plus lighting, set design, costume, casting etc all seem the equivalent of small movies in many of their skits. They definitely had a way higher than usual budget for this series.

[@commaJim]

Well that's the benefit of having a comedy central TV show, which they had between 2011-2015! Their budget increased as the show exploded in popularity.

[@cloudbud4313]

Well hello there skit I haven't seen.

[@fastf00dknight41]

Damien Fuentes there hasn't been a "new" K&P skit since 2015. They're all old, this one just hasn't been uploaded till now

[@mmp5453]

@@fastf00dknight41 that is the least true statement I have heard today

[@mistergoose69]

@@mmp5453 no...it took me 5 seconds to google. They stopped making new ones on September 9th 2015

[@mmp5453]

Ipun that’s just the show on comedy central, only aired 53 episodes but they continued making them after it went off air

[@mistergoose69]

@@mmp5453 you can find an article ranking "all" 298 skits, and it was posted on September 13th

[@jaredfran519]

“did you see the muskets he had?” Lmao

[@Kez_DXX]

Go back in time and try to terrify them by explaining the Gatling gun and then see Joseph Chambers start frantically writing the details down.

[@bigboi4269]

@@Kez_DXX Hey buddy, the Navy already had those for shooting at Turkish pirates

[@megalageorge9197]

I didn't get the ending part. Could you explain why Peele says damn it in the end and why 2 new bigger guns are shown in the end?

[@bigboi4269]

@@megalageorge9197 The Founding Fathers not only knew firearms would be modernized, they also made and bought several thousand firearm innovations. They didn’t exactly stick to muskets.

[@Kez_DXX]

@@megalageorge9197 Having recieved but a small taste of what firearms developments would unfold as time went on, the Founding Fathers were not willing to settle on merely encouraging their fellow citizens to have dual purpose muskets, purchase cannons, or crew privately owned warships as they did in our timeline. This caused a change in the timeline so that Peele brought back bigger and better guns into the past.

[@ursaminor9780]

Gotta admit, this comment section is way more friendly and wholesome than I expected.

[@RP-dy5mu]

It's because conservatives are able to have a laugh at a sketch without resorting to shit-slinging the creators because their political views don't align. I know, fascinating.

[@Runslik3Wind]

its just silly enough I try to assume noone actually thinks it.

[@badwulff]

Retro Progress Right. Except when the Dixie Chicks write a song about Dubya. Or "French fries" need to be rebranded to "Freedom fries" 'cause the French weren't supportive of the Iraq War. Or when Nike supports Kaepernick so Nike shoes must be burnt. Or when a hissy fit gets thrown about Potato Head, or Dr. Seuss, or Dungeons and Dragons. Guess all of those warrant shit-flinging, right.

[@ursaminor9780]

@@RP-dy5mu I dunno, after the hissy fits I’ve seen over Dr Seuss, Potato Head, and Lil Nas X, I think the ability to be a hysterical reactionary knows no political boundaries.

[@Moltenrokk]

@@ursaminor9780 if those thing you listed were in a comedy skit, they would be. But the fact that they are real makes it scary and worth calling out.

[@andreweisen99]

Thats probably what would happen. our founding fathers were actually pretty interested in firearms technology

[@justinpachi3707]

Some of them bought naval artillery and were early investors in things like the puckle gun. That was a precursor to the gattling gun.

[@andreweisen99]

@@justinpachi3707 the puckle gun was such an interesting design

[@patgray5402]

@@andreweisen99 The puckle gun? More like the SUCKLE gun.

[@micahturner6239]

Luke William L

[@KandiXoXoXo]

And all government has been doing IS infringing!!! ANY and ALL guns laws ARE infringements

[@andrew1498]

Uses guns to take away guns. “I used the stones to destroy the stones.”

[@grennbalze]

Thats like sideshow bob saying how evil tv’s are from a big screen tv

[@pleasesubscribe8762]

Yeah but in time travel movies they go back in time to kill people who invented it so

[@mickeyminaj7296]

You mean to say like using missiles to destroy missiles...hmmmm

[@arlenshepard3439]

Endgame

[@dogzer]

Plot Twist: He didn't buy a LEGAL firearm :-)

[@MaDNeSS1116]

Ok I’m convinced that they are still making skits together. That ‘I am amazed I found skits I never seen before’ thing is getting old now

[@modguy9894]

These skits are pretty old. Like 1-2 years probably

[@UmbrellaSound]

These are like 5 years old. I don't even know if comments like this one isn't some kind of elaborate joke.

[@sebastianfiedor8012]

MaDNeSS1116 when did they break up

[@williambradshaw7220]

@@UmbrellaSound These are really old skits that were never put online and are just now being released. Some people only know K&P through the internet and are just now seeing this content.

[@igpx666420]

@JohnPwnsOldschool case in point huh buddy?

[@oldschooljack3479]

Peele: "Gentlemen... Imagine if someone invented a gun that could kill 50 people in 30 seconds." Everyone else: "Uh, there are several variants of repeating arms... Like the Puckle gun. The technology has been around for a while now actually."

[@vanderful2397]

Thank you! I can't stand when "smart" people think that it took 4 centuries to upgrade muskets to a better guns or that Sam Colt invented like 90% of the revolver parts.

[@jordanoxx11]

The people also owned cannons on their merchant ships who were then hired as privateers against the British in both wars using letters of marque. Those ships were far more destructive than any full auto rifle today. Civilians would board and capture British ships.

[@jarrakul]

The Puckle gun was a crew-served weapon with a rate of fire of about 9 rounds per minute, which was never adopted for use by any organization military or civilian. Please stop trying to pull out gotchas you clearly know nothing about.

[@Gator_nit]

Uses guns to take away guns “Ironic”

[@Thezombiekiller06]

Wow thanks for explaining the joke I didn't get it

[@alfyortega473]

You will have thousands of likes in a year

[@YippeeKiYayMrFalcon]

Yup. Hmm.. Weird.

[@benrushing9685]

Hypocrisy

[@andrew1498]

I used the stones to destroy the stones

[@failed_K]

Uses the Second Amendment to stop the Second Amendment Edit:

[@marigo856]

@El Nomad also so that any jack ass can enter your office and threaten your life

[@moneyway8178]

Nathaniel Sr. ᴛⷮeͤcͨhͪ cities your house?

@@moneyway8178 yes my local business

[@leeks1408]

@El Nomad actually the Founding Fathers created the 2nd Amendment in case America ever went to war again. Then every citizen would have a gun so they could fight whichever country they went to war against. And now it seems like we’re going to war with each other 😞

[@Aegon1]

I used the stones to destroy the stones

[@BizzeeB]

The only way to stop a bad time traveler with a gun, is a good time traveler with bigger guns.

[@sam4secretary]

that's basically the theme of Terminator sequels, right?

[@xennial_miracle]

@@sam4secretary And much like this sketch, the time travelling cyborgs got increasingly more powerful with every attempt to end them.

[@kooshanjazayeri]

@@sam4secretary not exactly... the second one is a Good time traveler with much lesser guns, (but bigger brains)

[@andrewgates8158]

Cable

[@seraphendipity]

Dont forget that they allowed people to have _cannons_ , hard hitting naval artillery weapons. That’d be akin to long range missile launchers today. They knew what they were allowing.

[@codyprice0295]

-SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. -NECESSARY FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE STATE all gun laws are non statutory and ever changing. Gun control is nonsensical

[@never2late454]

What most people don't realize is that the first rapid fire machine gun was invented over 50 years before the constitution was drafted. And they were used during the revolutionary war.

[@bobmorhane6745]

@Yeshua Is Lord No ? Nazi germany was a collusion of so many things, a rise of radical political parties in Europe, a wave of manifesto and movement anti-jews coming from URSS who gave those radical parties a scapegoat to arouse the anger of the german people who were furious about the landscape following the 1st world war and the economic distress of 1929. It's a lot and lot of things. Not "people gun taken away so nazi germany"

[@markrenton2421]

Very different culture back then. Now the population is made up of self-centered nihilistic slobs that need the government to take care of them and think personal responsibility is the only evil concept.

[@carlweathers2387]

It wasn’t the the government “allowed” people to have naval cannons because the government can’t give us a right. If they could give us a right they can take it away and then it’s a privilege.

[@karbonkai]

Him: what if someone made a gun that could shoot say, 50 people in 30 seconds? Me: Cannon...

[@ghostf6321]

Founding fathers: "that sounds badass" 😂

[@Zuon94]

Tchaikovsky NO!

[@notkevindurant8814]

The Supreme court back then did argue about whether cannons should be able to be owned by citizens for their ships and the supreme court ruled that if the government/enemy is able to have it, you can have it. The whole "founding fathers didnt imagine we'd have ak-47s" argument isnt as powerful when you realize if they were in charge now, wed more than likely be able to own such a weapon because they were firm in their second amendment rights due to our countries previous relationship with the crown, not to mention the ever so common fear of future American governments abusing its citizens in a tyrannical fashion.

[@AlohaGamester]

Exactly my thoughts I'm glad I searched the comment section before posting.

[@jasonhymes3382]

@@notkevindurant8814 Its very silly actually that anyone would think the purpose of the second amendment was to allow people to hunt animals or defend your property. Like no its pretty specifically and obviously there so to overthrow tyrannical governments. Its like arguing free speech was not meant for instant communication.

[@damonreynolds6775]

Plot twist - in this new timeline the gun shop owner had the phased plasma rifle in 40 watt range

[@elgoogsucks9005]

Hey pal, only what you see...

[@destroyanad8651]

Wait, you cant do tha-

[@elgoogsucks9005]

@@destroyanad8651 Wrong.

[@johnbueno9324]

Let me close up early

[@tempviduse]

way underrated comment. not enough people got the joke sadly

[@yungbronstosaurus4162]

Banner shouts in distance: that’s not how time travel works

[@andresct7421]

i was thinking the same haha, i mean i get the point why he got better guns(Because of the two men drawing prototypes) but the more advanced guns shouldn't appear in his hands

[@MrTREEHUNTER22]

@@andresct7421 Depends on what kind of plot convenience you have. Banner's time travel operates under the multiverse theory in which a change in the past will lead to an alternate timeline, without affecting the original timeline you were on. Other forms of time travel make it so that there is only one universe in which we fiddle with time. Really time travel is just a broad idea that writers will detail in their own story, only to inevitably contradict themselves somehow (im looking at you The Flash)

[@fargo1234]

Endgame logic was flawed. It is true that if they got back in the time and killed baby thanos and returned to the SAME timeline, it wouldn't work but killing baby thanos would have created another timeline where thanos didn't grew up to be an adult

[@fargo1234]

But then they wouldn't be able to go to present in the new timeline as it is new

[@Kesiif]

I disagree because Uzis became a thong inthe 1700s(lore of this vid). So by time his time came around the only thing that seemingly changed was gun tech

[@lSirCumference]

Ironically he needed the guns to stop the government from making laws that he didn't agree with.

[@lovecakes44]

Glad someone still understands that.

[@JackOLanter]

Yeah, like, he wanted them to taste what they were doing to their country.

[@sababaratashvili8629]

@@JackOLanter Like what? Giving you rights?

[@MLBlue30]

@@sababaratashvili8629 More like taking the rights away and invading privacy. America was never great.

[@sababaratashvili8629]

@@MLBlue30 "More like taking the rights away and invading privacy." You are talking about 18th century, right? For that time US was very progressive. "America was never great." That's just factually wrong. Unless you're some nutcase like Antifa or something you would know that...

[@dogguy8603]

Founding Fathers: ". . .you know we can just write up another one right?"

[@evandrosilva8565]

I guess so. But I have one question. Do you want to change the words or the meaning of the words? I am asking it because I understand the second amendment is about freedom, that’s why it has never been changed.

[@hansjurgen4567]

@@evandrosilva8565 Why is it about freedom?

[@Kez_DXX]

@@hansjurgen4567 Because civil liberties are awesome.

[@juliapigworthy]

@@Kez_DXX And because those who do evil will always have weapons, especially if there's less opposition in the form of a well armed population who love their country and hate what threatens it.

[@alaric_]

@@juliapigworthy Evil has semi-automatic assault rifles, you have semi-automatic assault rifles. Evil has knives, you have knives. Well at least the general population won't have to suffer like in the Las Vegas massacre.... You know how Australia got tired of their mass murders? Well they got rid of the mass murder guns and have been better since then. Unless 2nd amendment people really think that USA is soooo close to the breaking point your president will go all Stalin on your ass? In which case i don't really see why you are so damn proud of your country that is held together only by a threat of force...

[@snoopy4411]

The way that Key swallowed is so on point! Their wigs are perfect🤣

[@HaveRandomQuestions]

props to the props team. seems accurate and... proper 🙃

[@snoopy4411]

@@HaveRandomQuestions 😄

[@crimsonstripes]

“I used the guns to destroy the guns” -Thanos

[@jacobsmith2577]

2nd amendment is inevitable.

[@kuyam6340]

but what did it cost? guns... lots of guns..

[@bryan3754]

And failed...

[@guiguiwilli4268]

It is annoying bringing everything with a MCU joke.

[@thomasself8096]

@@guiguiwilli4268 MCU Joke: I am inevitable.

[@alexbrown9761]

The ending is the best. They did good with this one

[@TF2bot]

The ending was actually funny, not like someone was trying to push an agenda

[@Raul-wd1jb]

“Than I’ll have to terminate the creator of guns”

[@johnwong5317]

@@Raul-wd1jb Then slavery would still exist much longer since British and French and later US were the one that advocate the most to abolish slavery.

[@MattWyndham]

I like how the time traveling was handled in this. He brought amazing guns back, then it sparked people’s minds and he got even better guns

[@Terra_Lopez]

Oh, I see! I didn't get that originally. Thanks!

[@darthjekyll3648]

The better timeline.🙃

[@giraffe3718]

but he could have just shot the guy who drew the guns right? or just kill everyone in the room

[@NemyacX]

@@giraffe3718 ah yes, kill everyone in a room to prevent people in the future from killing everyone in a room, genius

[@n8style]

thanks for explaining the joke!

[@gggggart8732]

Nice, they remembered that the founding fathers were revolutionaries

[@jondunmore4268]

Noyce. They also got it right that John Adams was black.

[@-o-dq7nd]

@@jondunmore4268 except he wasn't

[@dinkeykong]

@@-o-dq7nd Wow imagine if that was the joke they made. That would be pretty funny.

[@MilwaukeeF40C]

@@jondunmore4268 He sounded black on the phone.

[@myrhev]

Not only that but you could own cannons back then, which would be like owning a rocket launcher today.

[@JoeJoe-wp1vv]

I like how the shells fall on the carpet and make the "ting-ting-ting" Sound 🤣🤣

[@SlimThrull]

All shells do that when they fall on any surface hard or soft. The metal is hot and it contracts when it cools off quickly. That's what that ting-ting-ting sound you hear is.

[@Tony27654]

“Shall not be infringed” is pretty dang apparent to me.

[@Tony27654]

@@markdavis7397 well regulated meaning “well functioning” for the time period. Don’t forget “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” Also, the second amendment is really just an acknowledgment to your inalienable “god given” rights. You have the right to bear arms to defend your self against anyone looking to harm you, including a tyrannical government.

[@Tony27654]

@@markdavis7397the second amendment refers to “arms”. Meaning anything you can hold with your arms. Any firearm/rocket launcher/ cannon etc. your argument is stupid.

[@kooshanjazayeri]

@@Tony27654 no you are getting it totally Wrong! educate yourself, the right to bear arms means they could have gone bear hunting and use taxidermy to put it's arm them on walls that's the real right to bear arms'

[@Tony27654]

@@kooshanjazayeri lmao

[@Tony27654]

@StarWarsObservation-vs2sg “well regulated” meaning, in good working order, not laws and regulations of modern day.

[@MrMooseman182]

Imagine a never ending feedback loop. Guy jots down every new weapon Peele holds until he’s holding mini nukes

[@hardwirecars]

davy crockett rifle look it up you still aint advanced enough.

[@travishalford5223]

😂

[@raydiesel6251]

Consequences

[@unosheem6210]

Wouldn’t be possible the technology to create the weapons at a certain point would be far behind

[@crunchybones2528]

@@unosheem6210 you seem to have missed the part where this is a skit involving time travel

[@Aegon1]

He said “Damnit” as if it weren’t the first time he screwed up.

[@Aegon1]

B GONE!!!

[@sidneykemp1884]

Well now we know why everyone in this timeline is running around with all of these overpowered guns

[@blairmillington1793]

@@sidneykemp1884 there is no such thing as an overpowered gun

[@Aegon1]

Blair Millington bruh

[@jdagilliland]

In his original timeline, Archduke Ferdinand turned out to be really mean to Serbs in like the 1930s after acceding to the throne, so he went back to 1914 to waste that dude before he got out of hand. Didn't turn out great.

[@stuff1216]

I want a whole trilogy movie on this

[@manygoatmany6055]

Don't wanna spoil you but, there is one there is one

[@nlsn2684]

@@manygoatmany6055 how could you possibly know, what the future holds?

[@Ray-jg5dj]

Look up the "Dark" series. It's on Netflix.

[@GlareBoxTV]

Bill and Ted visit the

[@triplecrosscounter]

By the the third movie they have weapons that can rewrite reality and erase objects and living things from any timeline.

[@tsnoob4669]

This is actually a perfect example of a paradox.

[@FxllxwTheCircle]

How so?

[@ASSASSIN19923]

@@FxllxwTheCircle you can't change past

[@totallynoteverything1.]

@@ASSASSIN19923 Attractor Field, forces all worldlines to converge into a single point

[@angeloclubmix]

true👍especially dammit even bigger guns🤣

[@Raul-wd1jb]

@@ASSASSIN19923 unless he has to terminate the creator of guns

[@nofurtherwest3474]

"Gentlemen, imagine if someone were to invent a gun capable of firing hundreds of rounds in a minute" "Oh my, that sounds glorious. If we could only be so lucky!"

[@sparkyfister]

Not with ammo prices the way they are now

[@lumapas]

China:"we already did"

[@mikekasich836]

Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

[@alaric_]

@@sparkyfister Well, with the free slaves digging those bullet materials from the ground for free and no Wall Street capitalist in the between to fix prices, they would be very very cheap...

[@jesusfchrist8479]

@@mikekasich836 that was beautiful sir.

[@stewpear]

Lol so all he ended up doing was move the Fn F2000 up to being made 40 years earlier

[@rad_lad_2715]

To be fair 40 years is like an sixth of American history. It's a decent jump

[@jacksonreid3359]

Fun fact the founding fathers were actually aware of the existence of machine guns

[@asdfjkl981]

of course. only idiots would think that the evolution of firearms is completed in 1776. if you know that there was once an hourglas and than a clockwork (wich was already very common in 1776) you also can extrapolate a fully automatic gun from a musket. it is not that hard. people were not stupid back then.

[@reallyhappenings5597]

Well the Puckle gun existed in the late 18th century, it was basically a repeating cannon

[@santanagamingcinema]

@@asdfjkl981 EXACTLY. We imagine in the the future there will be; plasma rifles, rail guns, energy based weapons, bullets/projectiles that track track body heat and or movement. We imagine all kinds of firearm advancements. What would make us think that the founding fathers couldn't imagine advancements. Even if there weren't machine guns in that time period, its not hard to imagine point A to point B.

[@bthemedia]

And bombs, and cannons... and tyranny. Some real history on 2A intent kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5y6iJKvasmYm8k

[@JCJW101]

So you guys are cool with people having rocket propelled grenades at home without a licence or do you think there needs to be some limits?

[@henndawg42069]

Truly brought a tear to my eye when he revealed the truth and said, "I am the breaking bad"

[@Trazynn]

The only person who can stop a time traveller with akimbo uzi's is a a time traveller with akimbo FN2000's.

[@Underpar26]

That is exactly what I thought they were too lol

[@mikafor]

Mac-11s actually. Uzis are better than mac 11s.

[@RocketSquirrel111]

When I saw the fn2k's I had to rewind because I just couldn't believe I was seeing the fish gun in a skit

[@huntermoss9403]

Ew....

[@sf8262]

The only person who can stop a time traveler with FN2000's is someone with an RPG

[@skytrexz3714]

The moral? Never time travel kids

[@onkarkorde]

But if you get to smash

[@alanoxford6219]

actually when the 2nd amendment was written they had the Girandoni rifle with a high capacity magazine and privately owned cannons that when loaded with grapeshot were capable of wiping out entire crowds of people.

[@louisarius9672]

If I understand correctly, the grapeshots were regularly used on naval ships to take out personnel of the opposing ship, while the cannonballs were anti-ships. Do educate pls

[@iannonya5282]

Yeah there were a few rich guys with cannons, but most ppl didn't even have A gun let alone enough to kill a small army like some of the nutters these days

[@benwilson5893]

@@louisarius9672 grapeshot was also the most effective cannon shot used on land based cannons for stopping charging hostile crowds. It was used more often than cannon balls against the native Americans. Cannon balls like grapeshot were used more on land than out at sea and were originally designed for defeating fort and castle walls but was also found effective in anti ship roles. The shot was also popular with navies like you mentioned, but everyone who had a cannon including none affiliated individuals kept grapeshot handy. And there were, is and always have been more land based cannons than naval guns.

[@benwilson5893]

@@iannonya5282 enough people had firearms that were superior to the cheap military arms, that those few people you mentioned were able to defeat the world's most powerful military. But even with that victory over tyranny, the founders agreed with you and tried making every single individual responsible to keep and bear sufficient arms to carry out the mission of maintaining a freedom pursuing society.

[@KBoon]

@@benwilson5893 I'd also add that in those days the priority wasn't to have as many likes/followers as possible on TikTok and other social media platforms.

[@matchesburn]

...People actually believe that the framers of the Constitution thought that firearms technology would never advance? In fact, in 1777, Joseph Belton wrote to Congress about a new flintlock design he was working on that would allow a single user to fire 16 shots in less than 20 seconds with a single rifle. Congress was interested, but eventually turned him down because he was asking for too much money. So virtually everyone that was involved in the drafting of the Constitution knew that such technology could exist, since it was offered over a decade prior to that.

[@emilsonolano3055]

I'm still too early for a "Consequences" comment.

[@AnimalMother60]

For choosing to be too early: CONSEQUENCES!

[@likhochokri6849]

Consequences man, CONSEQUENCES! 😢😂

[@Ray-jg5dj]

You're not. I saw the exact comment you're talking about 2 comments above yours.

[@shdoopyloopy3733]

I got you fam. Went back in time to stop firearms from being created but i inadvertently created a paradox that unfortunately created even more dangerous firearms in the future which just made my whole objective ironic!!!!!!! Consequences!!!!!!!!

[@SamanthaIreneYTube]

shdoopy loopy “and then a piano fell on your head and you got the HIV... Consequences.”

[@John-doe955]

If only he had just done a little more research on the founding father to learn that a bunch of them were massive gun lovers/enthusiasts and attempted to purchase or did purchase what was essentially their equivalent of machine guns.

[@陳華山-o3c]

they need supreme weapons so bad back in those days 😂

[@KraziEyevin]

@@陳華山-o3c revolutions do that

[@mikekasich836]

Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

[@John-doe955]

@@mikekasich836 good meme

[@boilingsnowwater2121]

the 2nd amendment was added to appease racist slave owners. look it up.

[@HoundTS]

Can we take a moment to respect how they put so much effort into these? They are like mini-movies.

[@alphagt62]

Their sets and costumes are always on point.

[@daytonagreg8765]

They are always awesome. #2A

[@RighteeTighty]

Fun fact: There were automatics like the Puckle gun in the 1700s. Also Rifles that fire more than once unlike how modern people think of firearms in the 1700s. Some each get auction off; if you have FU money go for it. Saw 1 auction where a simple flintlock rifle went for 33k😭

[@neilkurzman4907]

Fun fact: they all work like crap. They were big, heavy, unreliable.

[@catioicat727]

2:08 for those wondering those are f2000 not futuristic but looks like it

[@thebadlander3608]

Yeah especially when you put a 203 on it lord have mercy

[@rj.voice.covers1891]

Yeah but they're crap though

[@1337penguinman]

@@rj.voice.covers1891 They aren't that bad, honestly. They actually look bigger and heavier than they are since the entire outside is just a plastic shell.

[@nofilter.906]

Gun lovers are childlike in the way they think,its a mental disorder

[@lotta3909]

I mean, using guns to take out the gun amendment. That’s like the grandfather clause. It’s a paradox.

[@jonathanyang2359]

The grandfather clause is actually a clause that prevented people of African American ethnicity from voting in the late 1800s. I think you are thinking of the grandfather paradox

[@mikekasich836]

Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

[@Big-Grizz]

If I’m robbing a dude, and he calls me “ruffian.” Bro I’m just walking back out the door. There is nothing in that house worth taking.

[@ofAwxen]

He stole the guns, or the military gave them to him as part of his time mission. No second amendment necessary.

[@CharFil]

For those who don’t know, there was already a prototype automatic rifle made during these times and they knew it was possible.

[@jamesrivera8755]

Thank you

[@ryans2832]

That's right there were also "high capacity rifles" that held 20 rounds, and the founding fathers were fans and we're going to put in an order for the military till they saw the price tag, and even though they knew they existed they didn't ban them

[@Itsprincesweets]

P-p-p-puckle gunnnnnn

[@joshuahynes8539]

Yes sir

[@TexasVideoDan]

Yeah but they also probably thought only white people would have them and it would help them control their slaves. 🤷‍♀️

[@TheFlyingZulu]

"Imagine a gun that can fire hundreds of rounds per minute... that will be eventually be banned in the future anyway." "Oh really? We must include these 'machine guns' specifically in the 2nd amendment then!"

[@ChrisPMuffin]

“Shall not be infringed” Fed boy

[@sirmount2636]

S H A L L N O T

[@reddevil99099]

@@sirmount2636 B E I N F R I N G E D

[@YusufKhan-wx1jn]

FED BOY

[@NomadRad]

F

[@CPLRedmond]

*Sees destroyed document. Constructs new one* “Ok, gentlemen! Where were we? Ah yes, your signatures please.”

[@thatalaskaguy4593]

Can we just take a moment and appreciate the costumes☺️.

[@saxplayingcompnerd]

Repeating rifles date back to the 1600s

[@BeansPredi-ch6xk]

Huh? Source?

[@gadget19k76]

@@BeansPredi-ch6xklook up the Puckel Gun, or the Kalthoff repeater

[@socaliente2543]

Machine guns were already patented when the founders signed the Constitution.

[@Dwarf2005]

and some civilians owned warships

[@DragonBlack199]

Damn so some of them thought that far ahead

[@BlueEyes-WhiteDrag0n]

Clown

[@futuristica1710]

You must be fun at parties.

[@skykingjason]

Not only that, but the founding fathers 100% knew of the existence of these machine guns. It's not like they couldn't understand that technology would advance, I mean they already had the technology at the time.

[@ik3astar383]

That's Andy from According to Jim

[@danielstack4158]

Yeah, it's cool he got to be on a show that's actually funny this time.

[@LocaLGh0sT]

@@danielstack4158 Indeed.

[@ik3astar383]

@@danielstack4158 yeah It was an okay show imo

[@hakrj12]

... I'm just surprised there are four people who know what According to Jim is.

[@danielstack4158]

@@ik3astar383 meh, we both like Key & Peele at least. RIP John Belushi

[@Broducts]

Notice how he's just congressman "Peele" here Maybe Jordan is actually a time traveller and is trying to warn us with these skits 🤔🤔

[@otsonoma]

Lol wouldnt be surprised

[@mcpopo6728]

Brodutcs WHAT the actual hell are your videoes?😂 are u a time traveller too?

[@kata9799]

@@mcpopo6728 🤮

[@Broducts]

@@mcpopo6728 i might be

[@1337penguinman]

What's funny is that's EXACTLY how they would've reacted. Show George Washington an AR-15 and he would have responded with "Get me one of those!"

[@icecold9511]

No he would not say that. He'd ask for a price break for purchases in bulk.

[@NBDG713]

HAHAHAHAHA DID U SEE THE MUSKETS HE HAD 😂 😂 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

[@andresparrow2971]

I actually wrote a short story with a very similar concept... You can't change the future because you have to introduce things from the future into the past inadvertently creating the same outcome you're trying to avoid.

[@wajisaleem]

Haha .. Makes sense. I guess you'd have to be vague and insistent? (There's gotta be a way.)

[@风筝-n8y]

yes You can't change the future because you are the future

[@timr3621]

"When you're so early there aren't any funny comments yet" Everybody in the comments: 0:30

[@jdwmyt]

Q: Why did Billy go out with a prune? A: Because he couldn't find a date!

[@jasonx1767]

Damn where u live.its 3:30 pm here in Kentucky

[@monteroonce]

Q: What’s a good woman and a good bar have in common? A: Liquor in the front. Poker in the back.

[@Theforgottensolider]

Bro didn’t destroy the second amendment he just improve it and gives it a upgraded version of it

[@last_surprise9507]

This skit can be sumed up in one word. CONSEQUENCES

[@free00to00ryhme]

Quick, give me the Quail pin so I can draw it before I forget. LMAO

[@siegfriedbraun5447]

The Puckle gun, invented in 1718, could shoot ten rounds per minute. Kinda a rapid-fire development that showed real potential. And, by the time the second amendment was signed, lots of variations and improvements had been realized .

[@michaeltammaro482]

You're attempting to logically pursuade those that are not even sure what gender they are.

[@siegfriedbraun5447]

@@michaeltammaro482 I'm realizing more and more, how insane that is. However, November's a-coming...

[@christopherton]

@@michaeltammaro482 well done

[@billklingon6806]

@@michaeltammaro482 LOL

[@americanakimura4813]

@@siegfriedbraun5447 annnd, Republicans somehow lost the senate that November. Sad!

[@manueldeabreu1980]

The irony is he wouldn't be able to own two Uzis now without a class 3 license and that is almost impossible to get.

[@shadow435100]

You realize that around this time period a dude came up with a machine gun that fired for a solid 2 minutes 30 seconds... The founding fathers knew about machine guns and they imagined that there would come a time when they would be in use, I mean hell volley guns existed. Turns out that right after the first gun was made people where already asking "how do I get this to shoot more bullets," and the founding fathers knew it as in the war of 1812 they bought 15 of those guns i mentioned.

[@KicksPregnantWomen]

its not for home invasion its so if the government starts becoming heavily authoritarian we have the chance to resist

[@shadow435100]

​@@KicksPregnantWomen I agree with you? did you ever see an agument in there for why your idea is wrong?

[@wx7fm]

@@shadow435100 I think he may have replied to the wrong comment?

[@shadow435100]

@@wx7fm No I purposefully replied to him, because... it was weird. I wasn't taking an anti-gun side but more that the founding fathers already knew the dangers and thought that they where worth the risk.

[@wx7fm]

@@shadow435100 oh yes, my bad for not being specific; I was talking about him

[@gurennsan]

Peele wiggling his head at 00:21 is so funny 😂

[@dymondqueeana9435]

I didn't even catch that lol. Thanks for the laugh

[@peterstoric6560]

“That’s not how time travel works, you change the past but it’s not your past. Your past is in the past and already happened to you. Your making a new past that can’t affect your present or their future. Back to the future lied to you” ~ Shrek

[@charlesloftin8768]

Shrek? Don't know about that but sounds like DBZ timelines as well

[@MechaShadowV2]

Obviously it depends on what time travel theory it's based on, but yes lol

[@Ausaris]

Reminder that the founding fathers were fine with civilians owning cannons and were aware of gatling guns that existed and were in use during the time.

[@YoungGameBeatTube]

I'm sure this comment section will remain absolutely conflict-free.

[@cwr8618]

hold my beer

[@rsrt6910]

Epstein didn't kill himself!

[@Ray-jg5dj]

Oh yes, I'm sure it will !

[@tyjohnston5889]

How would you know? Are you somehow from.....the future?

[@afiqfadhli]

I'm offended

[@mirawilliams4942]

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.” - George Washington

[@Fettclone1]

The militia part is forgotten quite often.

[@bthemedia]

more history on the right and responsibility of all able bodied men (aka the militia) to be armed and train kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5y6iJKvasmYm8k

[@DarkGT]

If that was really historical moment, those people will wonder what those two colored gentlemen are doing there.

[@burritodog3634]

all men are created equal

[@sorrowthendeath]

@@burritodog3634 yeah, but it's not historically accurate for that time.

[@androidwerewolf4541]

@@sorrowthendeath I think he is being sarcastic.

[@flabio7074]

AlucardAFT3003 are you sure?

[@sorrowthendeath]

@@flabio7074 I'm willing to be proven wrong. But as far as I'm concerned, there were no black men when the Constitution was being written... that's why BLM claims inequality and colonization after all... even when it's just a front for a Marxist organization that cares not for black lives.

[@danielsingle7214]

"Imagining the government having those weapons, but the very people we are trying to protect it from not being allowed to own them as well."

[@sanojks1]

When you find that one Key and Peel skit you haven't already watched..........it's probably new.

[@tateoien871]

This was pretty old actually, they just hadn't uploaded it

[@Ray-jg5dj]

There's no new Key&Peele skits.

[@mephistopheles5314]

I used the second amendment to destroy the second amendment

[@mamaksstorytime]

Looks like they just did a little extra skit after taping Drunk History.

[@BradiKal61]

Using automatic weapons to stop the allowing of automatic weapons , via a time machine powered by irony

[@TheBritishPatriot]

I guess Key & Peele haven't heard of the Puckle Gun and Gatling Gun.

[@angrykidwithinternetaccess9862]

The British Patriot the gatling gun was invented 100 years later sorry bud, nice try

[@KamisatoElias]

I don't get it

[@FriendChicken]

Puckle gun was 1722 (public trial) 2nd amendment was 1791 Gatling gun 1861 The transfer of information then was slow. And the puckle gun was never used.

[@solrinin]

I'm kind of curious how you'd think anyone could manage to get a Puckle Gun into a crowded area and kill scores of men before anyone had time to stop them? Do you think everyone in that crowded area is just going to stand back and obvious someone set up a giant gun on a tripod off in the (not too far) distance and just wonder what they're up to and do nothing?

[@b.k.3280]

The British Patriot 🇺🇳

[@Gun_Talk]

Killing 50 in 30 seconds sounds good when you're writing an amendment about fighting a tyrannical government.

[@futuristica1710]

Fast forward to school shootings. But, hey, it was worth it, right .....

[@Gun_Talk]

@@futuristica1710 So let's take away everyones rights because of one psycho, hey, let's also ban doctors, because hundreds of thousands of people die due to medical mistakes.

[@ButtKickington]

@@futuristica1710 Well, public schools are run by the government. And surely some are tyrannical. Can imagine someone who is forced to go every day to a place where they are constantly bullied would see it that way. And these types of schools did not exist when they wrote the 2nd amendment. Nor did gun-free zones, where most mass shootings take place. Schools are also not constitutionally protected. School shootings happen because someone wants to shoot the people they see every day at school. Their life must be a living hell. Maybe we should wake up to the problems in the school system instead. The schools aren't always the only victims. Often it's a result of one victim finally lashing out. Children are cruel and the system will solve problems in the laziest way. One child being bullied by 20+? They take care of the problem by reprimanding that one child. Have this child have to endure this for years and you're just making a powder keg. But the problem is the spark that lights it?

[@simonclarke7309]

And the right wing fascist pretends they're under threat to keep their brethren seething with an itchy trigger finger. Monsters

[@Gun_Talk]

@@simonclarke7309 except the fact that all the voilence, looting, rioting, burning down cities and murdering people is coming from all you leftie lunatics. And it happens most in democrat run shitholes of cities. So yeah, when someone is screaming "kill whitey" while trying to torch my house or my business, believe it or not I would feel "under threat". Gotta defend ourselves somehow from you violent morons.

[@kohlcooke8789]

I would low-key watch a whole action movie about this lol

[@TheHumanSystem]

I would low-peele watch one.

[@tempviduse]

@@TheHumanSystem nice one

[@daytonagreg8765]

YES 👏 👍

[@kurumauzamaki2731]

Fun fact I don’t know when or why it happened but it’s misinformation that the founding fathers only knew of pistols and muskets because during the American Revolutionary War there was wide spread use of full automatic weapons that could shoot 100 rounds per minute (could be wrong about the rounds per minute but it was certainly around 100)

[@AltarenGalil]

Ah yes the F2000 still being considered the most futuristic weapon in the world xD

[@angrykidwithinternetaccess9862]

Jan Šinkovec say what u want, it looks like awsome

[@ErebosGR]

That and the P90. And the G11.

[@anti1training]

The founding fathers were actually fond of firearms that shot more than one shot. Different prototypes were made back then. However they were very impractical. So this video is actually accurate to how they'd react

[@tiagomoraes1510]

Its not cause he would get shot, since people carried their guns

[@anti1training]

@@tiagomoraes1510 Huh?

[@tiagomoraes1510]

He would get shot, since people used to carry their guns, i doubt everyone in the room was without a gun @@anti1training

[@bellaf7774]

0:19 the way he shakes his head after he says "A point of order" 😂😂😭

[@jasonmiller8843]

I missed that, thank you

[@ADMONIUS]

The irony of gunning the second amendment down.

[@DD-su2qq]

Gun that could shoot 50 people at once... Cannon stuffed with 500 musket balls, let me introduce myself.

[@mikafor]

Or if you don't have any musket balls, use forks, nails, and other scrap like William "one shot" Dodson.

[@DD-su2qq]

@ tf do ypu think a cannon is? it is a gun.

@@DD-su2qq Okay.....so you said "gun...(nothing)" then "other gun introduces itself"..?? lmao thanks for clearing that up; now it makes total sense ha.

[@GBrimstone]

Puckle gun leans around corner....

[@bpurple7263]

kzbin.info/aero/PLZOMlO2_17fvIiTRFiQ9C2OqfGER03v4G I'd like to see your opinion on theese set of videos. I'll look for your coments under them. :

[@tksirius]

How ironic that he would use guns to get rid of guns. 😂

[@moussetache1815]

And then to get deadlier guns by deleting the older guns ... by using those same older guns. Ouch my head.

[@jenschi3833]

Right? They're brilliant.

[@Mike-gt1cs]

Like the anti-2Aer that wanted to kill people in the NRA headquarters with . . . . (wait for it) . . . . guns

[@mickee]

How was that ironic? "Hey, these apples are gonna be dangerous. You don't believe me? Ok, let me show you by using these oranges to prove my point."

[@rajabuta]

@@mickee shhhhh let them have their "supposed" Moment

[@michaelmclaughlin261]

When he upgrades to lasers: Founding Fathers: "You mean it's possible to shoot BEAMS OF LIGHT? We need to develop this!!!"

[@Ridlay_]

Bro used the second amendment to destroy the second amendment. Bro think he Thanos.

[@roninreturns]

"Let me get cheese on that Big Mac-10."

[@bpurple7263]

kzbin.info/aero/PLZOMlO2_17fvIiTRFiQ9C2OqfGER03v4G I'd like to see your opinion on theese set of videos. I'll look for your coments under them"

[@AA-vn3ru]

@@bpurple7263 why ?

[@AA-vn3ru]

@@bpurple7263 this is just a funny sketch don’t get political

[@RicoZaid_]

People owned naval ships with cannons back then. It covered them too.

[@cwr8618]

thank you. if you owned an armed ship back then, but now if you mention something like that, you'd get scoffed by folks. probably those on the left. is the govn any less of a threat now? nope. our ability to keep our own overpaid, overreaching, overtaxing, over-regulating govn in check has diminished and will continue with crap like this being pushed out. K&P starting to virtue signal and I'm about to tune the F off.

[@YippeeKiYayMrFalcon]

"But... the 2nd Amendment was ONLY meant to cover muskets." The 1st amendment should only protect a quill pen and ink then. There's NO WAY that they could have ever imagined instant communication and voicing of ones own opinions via the internet, cell phone, etc and everyone having the capability to voice their grievances in the public square.

[@drakesdrum1]

Yes, you're right. We must do something to stop the scores of attacks committed every year on innocent civilians by unlicensed gunboats. I can't even walk down the street for fear of some scurvy dog sailing his father's battleship into an office building and unleashing broadside on an unsuspecting crowd.

[@YippeeKiYayMrFalcon]

@@drakesdrum1 You have basically just explained why no regulations are needed for the AR15 and why fear of it is unfounded. Please look up what percentage of gun deaths annually is attributed to the dreaded AR15. Here is a hint (since you probably won't look it up) it's a very, very, VERRRRYYY small number.

[@JoshuaPitts]

@@YippeeKiYayMrFalcon How are you capable of defending countless deaths of literal children for the right to what, kill more people?

[@JohnGalt916]

Watching this post covid and post riots. Yeah... I'll keep my guns thank you

[@bpurple7263]

kzbin.info/aero/PLZOMlO2_17fvIiTRFiQ9C2OqfGER03v4G I'd like to see your opinion on theese set of videos. I'll look for your coments under them-

[@nad0862]

Keep your guns I keep my brain

[@frenchvanilla7109]

And you still didn't need it!

[@DamnItMantis]

@@nad0862 It's not smart to not have protection. 🙃

[@DamnItMantis]

@@frenchvanilla7109 Maybe not for the riots but there are other threats that warrant gun use (robbery, assault, etc.) And I would use a gun on the rioters if they attacked me.

[@PaladinBlades]

I like how the timeline changed to where it gave him FN FS2000's instead of UZI's, but both types of guns existed when he went back in time. Like, his actions didn't change the technology, just the guns he had.

[@Vladimir66616]

It’s implied that most people don’t know what those guns are and they he did alter the timeline. You probably googled it too to be sure. Use context

[@JUGGERNAUT____]

Not only were they aware of such possibilities. They frequently sought out repeater guns through out their lives and even funded some precursors to automatic weapons. Also... for a militia to even be possible at the time, regular citizens had to bring their own weapons which were usually their hunting rifles. So that militias could be formed upon any instance the right to bear arms needed to be enforced for an armed populace to even form a militia.

[@blairpenny1526]

People like to ignore that Thomas Jefferson owned a pair semi automatic rifles one of which he gave to the Lewis and Clark expedition, a weapon capable of firing over 20 rounds as fast as you could pull the trigger. Historically illiterate people

[@flewkisdead]

@@blairpenny1526 The rifle Jefferson owned fired 20 rounds in 1 minute at most. The self loading mechanism was the bottleneck, not how fast a person could pull the trigger. The famous Lewis and Clark rifle was also about 20 rounds in 1 minute. It was also an air rifle that required air reservoirs that were hand pumped ahead of time. Literally would sit there over 20 minutes to pump one reservoir. You inserted a full reservoir in the rifle to actuate the self loading mechanism. The reservoir and rifle had to be well maintained since leakage was a common issue. It was barely self loading most of the time. And no, they weren't the same rifle. The Lewis and Clark rifle was invented after the Declaration of Independence. Instead of making up history in your head and calling other ignorant, maybe go read about actual history.

[@blairpenny1526]

@@flewkisdead it was a Giradoni Air Rifle that was made used by the Austrian Army. It WAS the same rifle given to Lewis and Clark and was fully capable of what I claimed. Your bullshit pathetic attempt to pretend what I said is false is flat out wrong and your explanation is lacking. Just because it wasn't up to snuff with today's rifles doesn't mean that the founding fathers couldn't envision guns capable of firing multiple shots without reloading in rapid succession like leftist like you always try to claim. My comment was 100% accurate and the implications were also correct. The founding father absolutely without a doubt could imagine weapons capable of what we have today and much more than a muzzle load musket like you all like to claim. The rifle I am talking about pre dates the bill of rights jackass you know the document that enshrined things like freedom of speech and the right to bear arms...

[@blairpenny1526]

@@flewkisdead God I can't stop laughing at how wrong your entire rant was. The constitution has nothing to do with the enshrined of our rights and has absolutely zero bearing on the conversation. That rifle was in service for years before the CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS were written and it was the same rifle Jefferson gave Lewis and Clark. Instead of rewriting history to try and make your argument sound less idiotic and uninformed.

[@flewkisdead]

@@blairpenny1526 I like how you think the declaration of Independence = constitution. Yeah. We got a real history buff here.

[@jacobrengen]

Did you see the muskets he had? Quick hand me a quill so I won’t forget

[@jacobrengen]

brandotendie relax dudearomney I thought it was funny and I quoted it

[@user-rc4jz9dy1i]

"What if someone made a gun that could shoot say, 50 people in 30 seconds?" George Washington: "Ngl that'd be sick af bro"

[@Meshuga63]

They wrote that Amendment in because the British Army walked into their homes, ate their food, slept in their beds, and harassed their families, and there wasn’t anything any of them could do about it. So they thought to themselves, “If I and my friends had guns… and if the British Army KNEW I and my friends had guns… maybe George would have negotiated with us about exploitative taxes and bad governing policies instead of crushing us under is heel.” The founders preferred a madman in the street with a gun to an arrogant man in office with thousands.