Honda CR-V Hybrid review | Should you buy this one or a Toyota RAV4?

#HondaCRV #CRVHybrid #HondaCRVHybrid
The Honda CR-V is one of the most premium SUVs that you can buy. It's well built, has Honda reliability and can carry anything and everything that a family throws at it.
Now that the hybrid is on sale, is it worth it over the standard 1.5 petrol engine? How easy is it on fuel? All will be revealed in this video!
| SUPPORT THE CHANNEL LINKS |
Merch store link : shop.spreadshirt.ie/nobby-on-...
This channel is a passion project of mine which has required significant investment in terms of camera equipment, software and my time. If you'd like to support it or sponsor a video, check out the links
Patreon / nobbyoncars
PayPal paypal.me/noblemark?locale.x=...
Social channels for Nobby - / nobbyfm104​
/ ​
For sponsorship enquiries or to get in touch; [e-mail]

[@simonnash2416]

Got mine 2 September. Excellent car. Rewards smooth driving style with excellent economy. Quiet & comfortable.

[@narniebone1332]

Have a 2021 CRV EX AWD Hybrid from new have done 52,000 in it already trips to France are effortless it’s a great car, getting 42 MPG around town & saw 51 on motorway at a steady cruise but would go down to 45 in sport mode, highly recommend it.

[@timking1964]

2 x 29” electric mountain bikes, upright in the back (front wheels removed) is what swings it for me over a RAV4. That and mechanical AWD, as opposed to a lower powered, separate electric motor. The RAV4 has now joined the Apple Car Play party, but those awful, square wheel arches… Hoping for legendary Honda reliability in the Hybrid too. Thanks for the excellent review 👍

[@NobbyOnCars]

Thanks for checking it out Tim! Good reasons to go for it I think.

[@conorhanley9009]

Good to know you can fit 2 wagon wheeled mtb upright in the back that crv is an executive spec lovely machine

[@OpenEyeAutomobile]

Great review. Keep up the good work as well as the momentum.

[@workaholicjay]

4:43 I wish every car reviewer did this! Well done.

[@jorgeherrera1075]

Great fun review and simple

[@Adamadam-tc1qg]

Had one of these for the day today, lovely cars, surprisingly nippy, great suspension and yes I was getting 43mpg too :)

[@me109cito5]

4:34 Could be poison!! lol, made my day...great review, will check review for Rav4 as still undecided, we shall see.

[@cheeseyphil]

Great review as always. Honda are very hard to beat. They tick all the boxes. This one is on my bucket list. Maybe in a different colour.

[@conorhanley9009]

Nice real world review nice CRV the ex spec is impressive

[@gregoryobroin3461]

Just bought a CRv Sportline. Lovely to drive, very spacious,

[@ryanwilkins7080]

Excellent unbiased review, other reviewers should watch and learn

[@NobbyOnCars]

Too kind 😊

[@ryanwilkins7080]

@@NobbyOnCars call it how I see it

[@portraitonetelo1897]

Good review. Does it have lights on the sun visor vanity mirror? Tks.

[@NobbyOnCars]

It sure does!

[@portraitonetelo1897]

@@NobbyOnCarsNice! Cos, the non-hybrid variant back at where I live came without. Plus no memory seats. Beats me, why Honda would do that..

[@NobbyOnCars]

@@portraitonetelo1897 Memory ones here too. You better move to Ireland ;)

[@portraitonetelo1897]

@@NobbyOnCars 😁

[@qasimansari7540]

As always a great review! I have yet to buy my CRV because I'm thinking over the hybrid. In Italy you can get the fake wood trim changed to a dark grey inlay. Also you do not have to pay for parking so maybe that €2500 difference will be made up faster than 5-6 years. I am looking forward to trying one. Drove the petrol and absolutely loved it especially that sporty gear stick which of course the you do not get with the hybrid. Also if you use the clutch well and do not rev too much you can save petrol anyway! Also the petrol version has a bigger boot which is handy for a family man.

[@orientaldagger6920]

€2500 difference over 5-6 yrs is such a dumb reason. You brew your own coffee instead of buying Starbucks will save you that much. But I think the hybrid powertrain will be less expensive to maintain than the gasoline version. I have the Accord Hybrid with this powertrain and 6 yrs/80k miles later it still runs smooth as silk all I did was change the oil every 13k miles.

[@karenrosenbluh1638]

Excellent video. So are there any videos of crv that talk about repair costs of hybrid vs. non/hybrid, so that I can choose gas vs hybrid? Will the battery cost triple money to fix in a couple of years that makes the non-hybrid more sensible to buy?

[@NobbyOnCars]

A battery will always be another thing that can go wrong but you either put your faith in the Honda brand and take the chances with the reduced running costs (but initial higher price tag) or stick with petrol. Both options are still petrol cars lets not forget. If you think you'll save money over say the course of six years, hybrid could be the way but bearing in mind it's not a PHEV, the petrol might do the job just fine.

[@karenrosenbluh1638]

@@NobbyOnCars Thanks for your reply. My mechanic nearby says the cost of fixing the hybrid will be 3 times higher about 5-6 in to owning the hybrid and to forget it. I'm a senior that lives in a suburb and drives around town everyday. I go out on trips 100+ miles twice a year. I love saving the environment and not paying for gas EVERY week. So which would make more sense. You are an amazing car critic so I trust your thoughts!

[@thanoscy]

Nobby On Cars I own a Honda Civic hybrid(10 years), no extra costs, just normal service in honda garage. After 6 years the battery died and they change it for free(it has 8 years guaranties ) so no extra costs there. I will buy hybrid again, RAV4 or CRV (probably crv)

[@TR4zest]

It is also compliant with the Ultra Low Emission Zone requirements in London and other cities.

[@silverback1017]

4:30 It's Iocane in candy form.... INCONCEIVABLE!!!

[@normt5463]

"During our testing, the front-drive (Equinox 1.6t diesel)model was put through Real MPG's evaluations, and the results were an impressive 33.1/46.7 mpg, making this oil-burning family car one of the most fuel-efficient crossovers we've tested." Motor Trend

[@thegoodraj]

The door opening is very impressive in person. The wood trim looks nice to me. The Honda feels more quality inside than Rav4 and the boot seems more practical because the Rav4 roof line slants at the back which isn't great for large boxy items. I am leaning towards the Honda - the Rav4 is more efficient which is why I'm interested in it but its also quite commonly stolen and has the catalytic converter stolen often (just like the Lexus) - that's a big problem with Toyota and Lexus at the moment and puts me off.

[@larryaugsburger8452]

Always amusing in videos about cars how the host feels he needs to describe how it looks.

[@jabwana9946]

I have a 2019 CRV Hybrid. And I am aiming at a Toyota Rav4 Hybrid I will take both of them.

[@mrbrianthompson]

Would ya recommend this or a Kodiaq?

[@NobbyOnCars]

Both very capable, both expensive once you add the options. The Kodiaq has a wider range of engines available, the CR-V has no diesel option for example, not sure how significant that is for you though. They’re both great at what they do but if it were me I think a black Kodiaq with black alloys in Sportline would just snatch it. More just personal preference though, they’re both great options.

[@ocalakid55]

Honda needs to offer as an option is the BIRD’s EYE VIEW . GM , Toyota , Chrystler are offering this option that really makes backing out of a parking space easier .

[@theredreiter]

This options is needed because people never learned how to park?

[@trazyntheinfinite9895]

@@theredreiter (٥↼_↼)

[@jimjimgl3]

End of July we bought the 2019 RAV 4 Hybrid Limited. A different driving experience compared to the non-hybrid. The acceleration is better as the electric motors kick in first. Mileage is over 40+mpg at fill up. We test drove the CR-V (non-hybrid) and it did have a smooth ride but the engine felt flat. The CR-V design is overdue for an update. My partner, who doesn't really think about cars, said "I doh't like all the silver trim on the Honda, it feels old".

[@GreggK6EGG]

do you like your 2019 hybrid RAV4? my wife and i are debating on the honda CRV... I think Hondas feel cheap...

[@jimjimgl3]

@@GreggK6EGG Hey. Like any car there are things we like about the RAV 4 and somethings that are a little disappointing. The Hybrid handles way better than the gas because of the electric motor. The mileage for me is a below what the sticker reads. It says it should get 38/41 and we are averaging maybe 32 or 35. Still good but I think we are almost only stop-and-go and I think that has an effect on mileage. The engine is a bit noisy. I knew this going in so I wasn't surprised but still I sometimes find myself thinking "I wish it was more quiet". We came from owning a Subaru Outback which was noticeably quieter but still the CVT engine in general is more noisy. The mileage on the Subaru was not great. The sound system we have on the RAV 4 Limited is great. The heater/ AC great. Seats are comfortable. We were considering a Mazda CX but the interior was smaller for cargo than the RAV4. But the Mazda drove really well and had way less cabin noise. We test drove the Honda CRV and we liked the way it drove but the styling felt like it needed a refresh. I think it was 5 years since the last and we didn't want to buy into a model that was soon to have a refresh in design as that has an impact on resale. If you get a chance let me know what you end up buying. The Ford Escape 2020 is a hybrid but we did not test one out since it was the 2019 that was available and we knew a redesign was coming in 2020.

[@GreggK6EGG]

@@jimjimgl3 thank you very much for your honest insight on your purchase!

[@slix96]

I LOVE my CRV Hybrid AWD

[@jmw0368]

Great! 🥱

[@TomOS1971]

Hi Nobby, great review, nice to see what the newer 2019 version has over the outgoing model. I have the 1.6 AWD Diesel version (2015). Just on your fuel economy mentioned for the hybrid, I would typically get between 6.2 and 6.4l/100km in mine for mixed driving. I have gotten a lot lower and during the summer this year I got as low as 5l/100km driving from Castletownbere to Cork with a full boot, 4 adults and 2 bikes on the back. The gap between the parcel shelf and the back seats is to allow for the back seats to recline, I would presume its the same on the 2019 model. The outgoing model was practically a very good car anyway, so not much needed upgrading apart from the dash/controls which looks to have been addressed. Would probably still have one over the Rav, however with the Subaru Forester hybrid coming out in 2020 with a hybrid, this one could shake things up a little. Its definitely on my radar as I've had Subarus before. Would be good if you could get your hands on one when they come out to review it and draw comparisons between it and the CRV & Rav

[@NobbyOnCars]

You can’t argue with those fuel figures eh?! That’s the thing, the petrol one gets 8l/100 I think if memory serves me so it’s more of a long term keeping the car option I think. I chase up the Subaru I should be able to get my hands on one!

[@TomOS1971]

@@NobbyOnCars You're really only talking about €2.5k difference between equivalent models in the range between their petrol & hybrid models so it does make sense based on the figures quoted that the Hybrid is probably the better option even if you only kept it for 5yrs. My average annual mileage has come down considerably from approx 26,000km to 15,000 per year so for me the next car is going to be a petrol or hybrid. Working out the difference between the CRV petrol & hybrid consumption on my 15,000km per year I would estimate an extra 300l of petrol for the petrol version @ approx €1.50 per litre thats €450. Thats going to take about 6yrs to bridge that gap of the extra €2500 layout. Not sure what the savings would be on the road tax/insurance.

[@stephenpowstinger733]

The title doesn't show the model year but 2019 would be the outgoing model, 2020 the new one.

[@jmw0368]

With the greatest respect, nobody here is interested in hearing all about your old model.

[@ronbelcher9190]

You might have to take your tire off to plug it that's why there is a air pump

[@jaxxbrat2634]

Why no appliance plug with AC current?

[@NobbyOnCars]

Not sure, could be the market, have you seen it in others?

[@GregPolkinghorne]

Given its a 1 year wait for a RAV4 Hybrid in Australia, it boggles my mind why this isn't on sale here. Evidently there's a huge demand for hybrid SUVs here but few companies can be bothered selling them.

[@NobbyOnCars]

I always thought the CR-V was a big seller in Australia? Can you import one from NZ even?

[@jackp2563]

Have 2019 RAV4h. Two weeks old. Top trim. First tank made 852 km on 42L. Second tank poured higher Octane fuel, fuel economy even better, computer shows 4.8L 50/50 city -Hwy. AWD model. Can Honda beat that ? Besides, Toyota hybrid systems and batteries are well tested. 3/4 of taxis in my city are Priuses, nothing to add. Ps. My first Yamaha 49cc scooter was probably less efficient than current Rav4H

[@CrushDani]

Thanks for that insight. I've had my eye set on the CRV Hybrid, but the Toyota seems to be calling my name.

[@cinnamonmon2329]

I changed my '14 diesel CR-V for a Rav 4 this year. I test drove both and ended up going for the Rav 4. The spec level I went for in the Rav4 was 3k cheaper on the road than the equivalent (ish) CR-V (Sol in the Rav 4 vs Elegance in the CR-V). I've done ~5 thousand kms of mixed driving on the Rav 4 and am getting 5.5L/100kms. Nobbby must have had the lead boot on for his Rav4 review when he was getting around 9.5l/100?!?!? The Rav 4 has a higher spec relative to the CR-V (things like electric boot are available on lower spec models of the Rav4 than the CR-V. The Rav 4 is noisy as fook if you push it on, hybrids aren't meant to be thrashed me thinks, it is quicker than you'd think though (219HP vs 190HP on the CR-V). The lack of Carplay or Android auto on the Rav 4 is annoying when you consider it's a €40K car, Toyota have said that it will come next year as part of a software upgrade. That wood inlay is horrendous.

[@NobbyOnCars]

I still can't understand why it was so thirsty. I've driven the Corolla hatch and saloon and the Camry and they were very easy on juice.

[@cinnamonmon2329]

@@NobbyOnCars You must have had A/C at max, heated seats on, windows down , boot open and an electric grill plugged into the 12 V sockets! Did it seem unusually warm and simultaneously very windy when you were driving the RAV 4??

[@NobbyOnCars]

Cinnamon Mon 🤣 I’m trying to figure out was it even a brand new engine with no miles on it so it might have been thirsty but I don’t think so!

[@The_Falken]

I also own 2019 rav4H and over 6500km I am averaging 5.3L/100Km. This includes winter start ups here in northern Canada, and running AC in the summer most of the time. The CRVH does not compete mileage wise.

[@brickfirst2604]

RAV4 all day long for me.

[@cameronmiles606]

Yeah but more gas efficiency and more room in cabin

[@Lakewildwood12]

Will this come to USA in the future??

[@Tushkoo270]

Lakewildwood12 it already came in the US motor show will be sold in the USA by the end of this year or beginning of next year!

[@Lakewildwood12]

@@Tushkoo270 sweet!!

[@user-rg9sj8kc7m]

Driving uphill and mountain roads, Honda CR-V Toyota RAV4 which is better?

[@NobbyOnCars]

Rav has a bigger engine and slightly more powerful. They're both going to be strained sounding going up steep hills, much like any car but also because the engine will be relying on more ICE than hybrid.

[@user-rg9sj8kc7m]

@@NobbyOnCars thanks

[@graemetaylor629]

nice but its very expensive, I would take the Kodiaq

[@jeffchristie1541]

peugeot 5008 all day long for me i know you didnt option it but hey i just did lol .

[@disco.lemonade]

lol

[@jmw0368]

Oh do me a lemon! 🙄

[@philippernice8769]

Rav4 hybrid has 219 hp/ i hate fake wood and piano black trim , cant they come up with a good looking trim/ No body should still be using non led bulbs in 2020, how much are you saving?

[@thelolguy007]

She’s a beaut 👌

[@jeroenjansen2709]

CRV is looking way better, inside and outside, than the RAV4.

[@wgemini4422]

I like the armored cars better.

[@txivneeghmoobmeskas4930]

Is this CRV ha having the same issue of gasoline leaks into the engine? Better check out before you buy

[@benedictoloo2394]

Where can I purchase the same ?? ....contacts please

[@TR4zest]

What? Honda dealership near you.

[@jmw0368]

Surely you’d look up your nearest Honda dealer (rather than asking silly / lazy questions here? 🙄

[@stephenpowstinger733]

He said it was a 2.0 liter engine. That's odd as they've had a 1.5 L so far. Not much about the technical aspects of the drive. I'm American so some of this is confusing- liters, euros, boots. ..He's hard to understand and fades out when talking while riding.

[@NobbyOnCars]

If you want to learn more about the tech aspects of the engine, there’s plenty of other videos out there, including one of my own. Sorry that it’s confusing for you and that my accent isn’t clear for you but there’s this video isn’t aimed at the US market.

[@stephenpowstinger733]

I’ve said before I wish the English language vids would have a code or something indicating country of origin. However, I watch many British vids and it’s interesting to see the market differences. Thanks.

[@captainjack6890]

The 1.5T engine is just one engine option for the CRV. Different markets get different choices. US only gets the 1.5T and the old 2.4L. Europe gets a 1.6T diesel too and 2.0L Hybrid.

[@motleydude73]

@@captainjack6890 US us getting the 2.0 hybrid too.

[@Garno2000]

Good review - what about comparing to Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. That does 45km EV range and 2l per 100km. Also Japanese car. You talk about Hybrids that aren’t plug in, as if that was an advantage or manufacturer has some secret technology that PHEVs don’t have. The reality is they are last generation technology. For those looking to buy a new car, another advantage of PHEVs is half price tolls nationwide and parking in certain locations.

[@NobbyOnCars]

You have to understand that a lot of ‘normal’ car people don’t understand the differences so I was pitching the review at them more than those of us who are a lot more clued in. Personally I’m not a huge fan of PHEVs, the claimed full EV mode is generally very limited so I’d always say to those who ask either go hybrid or just take the plunge and go EV.

[@Garno2000]

Full disclosure, I own the 2019 Outlander PHEV, it consistently does 45km on full electric charge. I do a lot of mixed driving and average under 3L per 100km, with regularly charging. That includes a lot of motorway driving. The Outlander is a 4 wheel drive PHEV and does that sort of economy. You really should review it. It’s 40k, half the price of a 4 wheel drive full EV SUV. Similar price to ‘non PHEV’ CRV.

[@James-il3tq]

@@Garno2000 The problem with PHEVs is when they're in electric mode they're pulling around a useless engine. When they're in hybrid mode they're pulling around a useless large battery. So overall they're not very efficient. Which is why once the battery runs out on its limited range the Hybrid fuel economy is significantly worse than the RAV4 (25MPG US vs 40mpg on Rav4). It has to pull around a larger heavier battery & and the engine.

[@Garno2000]

@James , from an engineering point of view, you make a good point. From a consumer and euro in your pocket point of view, not so much. I bought my Outlander PHEV for similar price to the Hybrid CRV. I’m averaging 3 litres per 100km. You won’t get anything like that in the CRV. There is also the advantage of reduced tolls and parking, along with the Mitsubishi 8 year warranty. For SUVs, I see the evolution as being Petrol/diesel ICE -> Hybrid (like CRV) - > PHEV (like Outlander) - > Full Electric (that is some years off at this price point, there is the E Niro but it’s a much smaller vehicle). On that basis I personally see the hybrid CRV and hybrid RAV4 as being last generation technology. I believe Toyota are working on a RAV4 PHEV, I would speculate CRV PHEV not far behind.

[@3204clivesinclair]

Nice car. 10-15yrs ago Honda and Toyota went toe to toe in the reliability charts. These days, Toyota is still up at the top, Honda sadly isn’t anymore - just average.

[@TheSpita80]

Honda make more things than cars only there more bigger. In US they drive more hondas then toyota

[@leeholmes1525]

Wrong car sorry, it jumped to the Honda CRV which I have also, diesel ex spec 2017 model, brilliant car, not keen on the hybrid, drive a RAV4 as a company vehicle

[@jevgeniardassov]

49 grand for so many cheap plastics, hmmm...

[@nidalelias2720]

Honda

[@simonnash2416]

Fake wood can be changed to silver as I have done

[@henryhonda8408]

I don't like the colour silver..... so fake wood for me! lol

[@jmw0368]

@@henryhonda8408agreed!

[@walter777smith6]

RAV4 IS LESS ROOMIER THEN CRV.

[@ianlee5008]

It only has 183 HP compared to a rav4 that has 219. Its like night and day.

[@NobbyOnCars]

Can't say there's a noticeable difference in the real world I'm afraid!

[@jfelipehoyos]

Yes, but even with less power CRV is faster... Toyotas are very boring cars to drive, automatic gear boxes are boring and slow

[@robc8593]

Actually its not. Honda quote 190bhp as the nominal combined engine/motor power but have been pretty secretive about the actual peak power output. It feels like at least 200bhp and being more primarily electric motor driven the torque is very available, its very quick off the line. Truth is they are both pretty quick cars, the RAV4 absolutely charges 60 to 80, the main thing that hols back using its power is the rubbish high efficiency tyres they fit, they complain at the slightest sporty driving.

[@James-il3tq]

@@robc8593 Hybrid cars always come with low rolling resistance tires to get the highest fuel economy rating from the manufacturer. Changed my Rav4 hybrid tires right away to good all season 235/55R19s and car handles, drives and brakes better. Worth the 3% loss in fuel economy IMO

[@Phrancis5]

Even the non-hybrid Rav4 has more power than the CRV, yet the CRV is faster. People never seem to consider weight, gearing, and torque curves...

[@derbeno1152]

The petrol has a whiny turbo engine

[@trazyntheinfinite9895]

pre 2020 hybrid crv has 2 liter non tugo, all 2020 and on will have a turbo charged engine.

[@theeventguru]

I have mainly been driven Honda cars for donkeys of years but I feel they are now going down the toilet including customer service. Doesn't feel like Honda anymore. Very sad. Originally I would only buy Honda. Not anymore.

[@mrcn119t6]

50,000 euros?!!

[@NobbyOnCars]

Irish prices... we get hammered on tax

[@nicholaslahr2985]

The fake wood in the cabin is the main reason I chose the RAV4 Hybrid over the CR-V! It’s the ugliest, cheapest looking stuff...I firmly land on the side of HATING it. Great car otherwise...just terrible ‘wood’ and infotainment system is pretty weak.

[@NobbyOnCars]

Some silver, piano black.. anything.. would make a big difference. A very comfy car to do big miles in though

[@robc8593]

A CR-V SR is an almost exact match for a RAV4 Excel, price, size, specification. I tested both back to back... I agree the CR-V is the SLIGHTLY better car, it rides better, has better screen, better driving aids, better shaped boot, quieter, equal performance. But I bought the RAV4, well as a UK company car, mainly for financial reasons. The substantially lower CO2 of the RAV4 saves me £600 in tax a year. And for some reason (maybe fleet discounts, residuals?) our lease company could provide me with the RAV4 on a 2 year lease for the same price as the CR-V on a 3 year lease (despite identical list prices). So I get a new car sooner and pay less tax meanwhile. The CR-V was better, but not that much better! Also the RAV4 is giving me over 45mpg with no restraint on driving pace.

[@NobbyOnCars]

The Rav is still a lovely option to have so I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it.

[@robc8593]

@@NobbyOnCars I am not, 2500 miles in and I love it!

[@wilshirewarrior2783]

I live in California where fuel prices are $2 a gallon more so the hybrid makes sense even if Democrats don’t.

[@jackp2563]

Jeff Martin If the fuel prices are too high in CA You should get TrumpMobile powered by clean coal then. Beautiful Clean Coal

[@vegasmooch]

@@jackp2563 you Looney leftists pretend to care about the environment. I'd rather have clean beautiful coal than feces, urine, and needles like you leftists love on San Francisco sidewalks... or feces, urine, and rats piling up in Los Angeles. Rain washing all the human biohazard straight into the ocean. Hope you guys enjoy that Dungeness crab swimming in water tainted by human feces! Not to mention the out of control growing homeless populations all over California. Homeless in Los Angeles totalling over 60,000, and 1 in 7 people in Los Angeles County is an illegal 👽. Thanks to leftists, the bubonic plague is making a comeback! Yay! Looooove your Looney leftists laws!

[@rncondie]

jack p, I have no idea why anyone would be a Democrat. Look around you. England is dealing with Brexit and their economy is down. Europe economy is in the toilet, Canada lost 70,000 jobs in November, Japan is sucking USA added 266,000 jobs in November. Get a clue it is Trumps policies why you and I have seen raises in our paycheck. USA has the strongest economy presently anywhere in the world. If USA stayed in the Paris accord we would also be in the same spot as the rest of the world.

[@Perich29]

I would wait atleast 4 years before you buy that thing to see how it hold, because the earthdream engine had oil dilution on the newer civic, accord, and CRV, same goes with the 2019 Toyota Rav4.

[@bluearmy7690]

Perich29 this engine is non turbo 2.0. So no oil dilution at all.

[@James-il3tq]

2.5 L engine in the new RAV4 is proven and reliable. Same goes with the hybrid system, it's been used for 20 years in the Prius.

[@Ketoswammy]

Quit making things up, there is no know oil dilution on the Toyota.

[@JKOOLjam1234]

That head unit is so freaking ugly.. with useless black bars all around. Hope third party head unit manufacturers design one for this vehicle

[@coolister3852]

Honestly you shouldn’t be doing car reviews if don’t have the knowledge. Toyota hybrids are completely different from Hondas so if you say that main difference is the floor you just showing your either incompetence or ignorance, you tell me which. In Toyota there’s no gearbox with clutches etc. as it’s in Honda, you can start here.

[@NobbyOnCars]

They’re both CVT transmissions. They both don’t require plugging in. I make reviews for normal Joe soaps and will explain it in layman’s terms for them however I see fit. Kindly do one! 👍🏻

[@coolister3852]

just lazy then...@@NobbyOnCars

[@biga4971]

Speak up!

[@NobbyOnCars]

Get yourself to an ear specialist mate!

[@biga4971]

@@NobbyOnCars That's my advice, good luck

[@darkroastlefty2803]

wait! "turd" honda cr-v? lol

[@TheBalcerman]

Yes. Fake wood is a disaster. I would never buy a car with this fake shite if wouldn't be able to cover that with ie. vinyl.

[@EpicEternal2]

THE VIDEO STARTS WITH CALLING CRV “TIRD”.

[@NobbyOnCars]

Whatever you're smoking !

[@georgecosse6870]

Very uninformative review.

[@NobbyOnCars]

George Cosse must be why it has over 100,000 views 🙄

[@tonyrock5313]

Don't buy a hybrid. If the battery dies you may have to trash it.

[@SSB362]

10 year 150000 mile warranty on the 2020 Toyota batteries.

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

You can replace the battery cells.

[@tonyrock5313]

@@user-tb7rn1il3q for how much?

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

Tony Rock Less than 1000 USD, assuming a few bad cells and a rebalance. Hybrids don’t make sense in the US with plenty of cheap fuel. In Europe they are a necessity on larger cars.

[@Lycoris831]

@@user-tb7rn1il3q Gas is so expensive in California, it makes sense.

[@wp65th50]

Buy your mother RAV4, Toyota sucks in these days.

[@Tushkoo270]

Ikr now a days Toyota designed vehicles & Lexus designed vehicles don't look good Honda is becoming so beautiful than before. And Toyota is becoming real ugly, especially the grills on Toyota & Lexus looks real disappointing 🤮 #HondaForLife