Honestly Ranking EVERY Premier League Club's Transfer Window (Tier List)

[@LyesClips]

Poor timing on this upload not gonna lie🤣🫣

[@tttnk8910]

Fr 😂

[@nont18411]

Yep, but to be fair. Your club did almost everything right so far in the transfer window. The everything that went wrong is on the pitch and it came from the decision of not sacking that bald fraud sooner.

[@Joewiz01]

Suprised this channel isnt alot bigger already , one of the more consistent reasonable voices on footy youtube rn

[@Joewiz01]

Please keep this up loving all the content

[@LyesClips]

Appreciate that. Only really seriously committed to uploading on here around the end of last season tbh!

[@Joewiz01]

@@LyesClips here's my since day one ticket lmao

[@LarsLars-kb4rk]

Agreed

[@BraveNewSoul]

@@LyesClips you should be uploading these kinda videos on your main channel ngl , splitting the channels like that idk how it’ll be for growth

[@KibalaSports]

to put chelsea at d and tottenham a is extremly contradicting they bought 1 proven player in solanke. The rest are all question marks and we dont know if they are good enough, that is pretty much what chelsea have done on a bigger scale.

[@MrPooley1]

You lot still don’t get it do you 😂😂😂

[@peterumathum4903]

​@@MrPooley1get what exactly? What did he say that's wrong?

[@MrPooley1]

@@peterumathum4903 buying lots of players doesn’t = good window and can actually be a bad thing.

[@peterumathum4903]

@@MrPooley1 that's true but the comment you replied to wasn't talking about this. I agree that the chelsea signings COULD turn out horribly but at this point there's really no reason to say spurs did better and especially not with such a huge gap. Like if chelsea is d tier what makes spurs a tier?

[@houradm.419]

Chelsea and objectivity don't go together these days... Chelsea sold the most player and bought some new quality player but still no body give any credit

[@Lu149]

Yeah but the point was they didn’t sign a striker who they wanted and in Felix and Sancho they signed 2 players who haven’t shown consistency in years. The rest of their signings are either meh or simply players that are just used to turn a profit and will never play first team football. Neto is a very good signing even tho he’s injury prone

[@teeqx7361]

@@Lu149Jackson got 14 non pen goals last season and he missed loads of chances. They prolly just banking on him improving his finishing and he’s young as well. Jackson overall is good just can’t finish for shit

[@madeupstory9510]

28:22 It's not just the incomings and the outgoings but also the fact that we successfully kept KDB, Bernardo and Ederson. It was very easy to lose them and the board deserves credit for having them stay.

[@footballunplanned]

Spurs is C at best, they signed Solanke for huge money considering he had one big season in mid to low tier team. I'd be surprised if he manages to score at least 15 in prem this year. They payed 40 mil for Gray and if they don't plan to use him he can go back on the list of prospects they didn't develop. He only had 29 min in first 3 games. They splashed 100+ mil pounds and still didn't fix their depth issues.

[@jerryryan6502]

Forest only getting a C is crazy. Surely not an A+/A, but a solid B makes sense to me. They kept all of their key players while adding depth and players to the 11 everywhere except striker. The net spend on the window was ~19MM loss, so sensible with FFP while leaving something for January if they need it.

[@Lu149]

Don’t get people questioning City at A. They are arguably the best team itw which hard to upgrade. But Gundo for free is amazing and Savinho for 25m is a bargain, he’s gonna be one of the best wingers in the league soon. They also kept Ederson and got a lot of money for Alvarez who’s a top player but always gonna feature as second striker to Haaland. They are in net positive and I’d argue got stronger

[@shreyam1008]

29:22 Man city

[@SomethingSomewhereJustOnce]

Thanks!

[@emreescobar8734]

Rating Uniteds window A and chelseas d is crazy

[@fplfieco22]

It's not

[@vinsmokesanji6280]

@@fplfieco22it is lol. Only De ligt starts at Chelsea of Utd’s signings lmao

[@onlycyro10]

@@vinsmokesanji6280just cause you guys buy a lot of players don’t make it good lmao

[@pinealdreams1064]

​@@vinsmokesanji6280only like 2 of Chelsea's signings will get into their 11. What even is there 11? Does anyone know?

[@rosellejurd1348]

As a united fan we should be on C tier, our signings are solid but our main problem are wingers, rashford and Antony are 2 of the worst wingers in the league and we haven't fixed nothing

[@nont18411]

Nope, your main problem is the tactic. It has been 3 years since ETH got this job and his tactic of playing basketball didn’t evolve one bit. That’s why the other teams can carve your midfield easily like a butter. That’s why you can’t control the game while having so many players injured thanks to excessive work rate. The whole Antony and Rashford is secondary to this.

[@SomethingSomewhereJustOnce]

I wouldn't listen to these lies about my 🐐 Antony. Stop this or I'll sue you.

[@vypervfx7519]

no tactics , clueless , just relying on lucky goals

[@nont18411]

@@vypervfx7519 Gary Neville got fired right away after he lost 7-0 and yet ETH got to stay almost 2 years later.

[@Gswizz100]

So wait, Rashford (and Antony who isnt playing) need to drop deep, playmake, hold possession for our midfield and then burst forward and score the goals as well? Loosen it.

[@fplfieco22]

This is most I've agreed with anyone on a transfer window tier list by a mile. Good vid 👍

[@gabriellaonyemeh6358]

Quality vid again from lyes , trying to drtox myself from the surface level analysis coming out these days 🐐

[@yungtrashlord]

thing about amadou onana when playing for us is that he rarely have games where he stood out amongst others, he is good but he is never that kind of wow player for us so for us evertonians, many of us actually don't mind us selling onana

[@thedonm2045]

Chelsea literally got better, did people see our team last season?

[@ET.1506]

They won’t admit since Chelsea agenda is popular rn

[@raihanrahman398]

You say this every summer and do dogshit still

[@nont18411]

Yep. Buying too much or not, as long as it works on the pitch, then it’s good.

[@Av4nQuisH]

they needed a striker more than anything, but imo chelsea getting rid of lukaku, kepa, sterling huge wages and selling gallagher for 42m is what made their transfer window successful

[@LyesClips]

A new manager is a huge part of that. And this ranking is on transfers only

[@bexclue3007]

People keep saying that City haven't replaced Alvarez...but they kinda have. Or rather, the answer to the question "Did they even need to replace him?" is a very clear "No, they didn't.", at least for now/this season. Bc City _do_ have an Alvarez replacement. He's called *Kevin De Bruyne,* who was missing the first _twenty_ PL games last season, which was the main reason Alvarez got so many minutes to begin with.

[@nicholaskrit17]

Everything in this video is pretty much spot on sure maybe I don’t agree with everything 100% but atleast bro gave his explanation for all the topics 🎉

[@funisanartform]

I see opportunities to grab a marquee signing for Arsenal next season. Especially if they win the PL or UCL to turn the heads of players. Their lack of spending this summer may let them break the bank for Leao next summer. FDJ & Musiala are running down contracts & cannot leave for free. Camavinga & Rodrygo might lack minutes at Madrid if Valverde/Guler eat into their matchtime. Even Trent may be temped if Arsenal REALLY shine this season. Then there's the high potential players like Nico, Ferguson, Diao in attack. If they get a marquee & another highly rated talent, I can understand why they held back this summer.

[@Lukqru]

as a chelsea fan i really dont mind us not signing a centre forward, Jackson is getting better and better and we have felix and nkunku who can play as a false nine Still not a fan of signing 20 wingers though obviously

[@lanceboneau4472]

As a Chelsea supporter, seeing us at D doesn’t feel right, yet I agree with pretty much everything said about them in this video 😭 GK Situation is sketchy and it’s hard to see Sancho and Felix being anything besides EUCL players. Think that the seemingly random new contract for Jackson signals that we are content with him as the 9 for long haul though.

[@MrImabowss]

United finished 3 points behind Chelsea last season, and Chelsea have a "D" level window whilst United have had an "A" level window. So you should finish ahead of us this season, right?

[@nont18411]

On paper: Yes. But we all know that Ten Hag will somehow fumble it even though he has all the ingredients that he wants. He should have been fired ever since getting grouped out of the UCL, let alone the 7-0 yet he keeps failing upwards.

[@MrImabowss]

@@nont18411 On paper, you're not even close to us. We're the ones people should be afraid of if the coach manages gets us to click and we start playing.

[@spinyslasher6586]

On paper, Man Utd have the better defense. Currently has one clean sheet in the Prem, while Chelsea has none. Chelsea are just relying too much on their attack.

[@nont18411]

⁠@@MrImabowss Did you understand the word “on paper”? What I meant is that if we don’t consider the performance on the pitch, then United has a better transfer window because the manager gets the players and the staffs he wants while Chelsea is still in a transitional period. But look at what happened so far, Chelsea has a much better trajectory and could topple United easily as well because Ten Hag is such an awful coach with headless chicken tactic and horrible training sessions that keeps injuring the players. So I’m saying that in reality (which is in contrast to “on paper”), Chelsea is in a much better position. I’m agreeing with you here.

[@MrImabowss]

Except that we're better than you, "on paper" and in reality. You're suggesting that if we both actually had good coaches, you would be better because you have better players. That is far from the truth.

[@zanussidish5685]

Very good review. Everton I'd have at F.

[@arsenesson8033]

As a Arsenal fan I’d say a high C, we got everything we needed but not in the right quality. We didn’t need Calafiori but he is obviously an improvement and depth, Merino is a amazing signing from what I’ve seen and Sterling is alright I guess but what we needed was a world class winger. Either Rodrygo, Leao or Sane even an Eze would’ve been good. Sterling will surely be good but we need a monster

[@wilsonemmanuel6305]

United having an A is soooo naive. They successfully kept deadwoods like Eriksen, Maguire, EVANS, CASEMIRO, ANTONY, RASHFORD, SHAW and even MALACIA. While not signing a winger is a big fail from Utd. They've scored 2goals in 3 games, they literally went into this summer in need of at least 3 attackers but they got a 9½ in Zirkzee. An absolute FAIL

[@bigkubz6003]

Can you do this for the top teams in other leagues?

[@nont18411]

For Man United, seems like everything that is improving is all off the pitch. The only things that remain 💩 right now are the manager and the basketball tactic on the pitch.

[@lotharlaishram765]

Wait for the bald fraud to get the sack, van nistelroy will take over and things will improve on the pitch

[@lakerzfanatic]

This list is perfect, but....I think forest got hard done by. If that was palace or bouremouth with those signings they'd get a b. West ham fans btw. Great video best list so far

[@Diogo85]

It's called opinions.

[@lakerzfanatic]

@@Diogo85 did something I said bother you?

[@Diogo85]

@@lakerzfanatic No.

[@lakerzfanatic]

@@Diogo85 then I don't understand, are you saying that my opinion of an opinion is wrong?

[@Diogo85]

@@lakerzfanatic There's no such thing as an wrong opinion or take, only good and bad takes but they're subjective.

[@darren223]

Most of our fans wouldn't have given our window that ranking 😂. We still need a proven, top class winger and depth for the left side of the defence and goalkeeper.

[@kit2877]

I feel like nobody is being objective with chelsea's window in isolation. Yes we have over the last few transfer windows put ourself in a position where our club has too many players but Enzo has made it clear what he wants and its obviously not eehat we have. In retrospect BECAUSE we sacked potch our transfer window in 2023 can be rated an F but this transfer window we have achieved our goals no matter how nefarious you think they are. Offloaded players enzo doesn't want , expetitiously solving our biggest problem which is potential ffp issues. Signed players with potential for fair prices granted Neto may have been a little expensive but still a great player. Kept our key players and replaced the ones we lost (kept palmer replaced Gallagher) Rating the position our club is in and rating our transfer window is not the same thing. We have had an excellent transfer window outgoings almost matching incomings monitarily, reducing wage bill, improving first team, fixing imminent ffp concerns, Is the vaccuos regarding the long term future of chelsea? MAYBE, but to act as if it definitely is is disingenuous. We have young players getting better and a large amount of sell on value because yes we have spent the most in Europe for the last 3 years but we also have made the most with player sales. I mean i guess if you want to rate our window in context of our other windows you can say we have had D tier windows and our club is in a D tier position but to say this window was D tier is objectively incorrect

[@123sarahwoodsandas]

Chelsea did not spend £77m on Sancho and Felix. At the cheapest it could be £64.5m (£44.5m + £20m) and at the most £69.5m (£44.5m + £25m).

[@isaacthegrreat]

You’re not wrong that Arsenals final piece needs to be a superstar in attack, but I disagree with the premise they didn’t try. That player wasn’t available. Mbappe? Never gonna happen. They want Nico (maybe not even a superstar) but he didn’t want to leave. Past that, who was the available star? Every “star” was a huge risk and hardly worthy of that title or money.

[@akira-san9097]

It doesn’t change anything but you did forget that Arsenal signed Neto

[@kingsmen.d8870]

brother can u do a little editing like show players pics so that we can also know which payer you are talking about

[@nawe89010]

I need people to see how different this guy speaks on Zirkzee and Jackson. Jackson is better in every department but can’t be a “top 4 ST”. I wonder if he thinks Zirkzee can be.

[@LyesClips]

you are not winning the league with zirkzee upfront. Not sure where I’ve insinuated differently

[@LyesClips]

Also never said Jackson isnt or cant be a top 4 striker. I talked about challenging for major honors with him up front

[@nawe89010]

@@LyesClips it’s just jarring that Zirkzee “raises the technical floor” but Jackson who is better technically, and bagged almost 20 league goals so far has doubts over him. Major issues on how he’s spoken about for me.

[@emilevangheem6165]

@@nawe89010 What is Chelsea’s ambition?

[@Gswizz100]

@@nawe89010I’m a united fan and I absolutely love Jackson. If only he was a pass first striker. He’s so good with the ball at his feet but doesnt have the finishing for his own playstyle

[@natik1498]

As Cheslea fan I don't agree with our transfer policy specially not buying ST and GK But your UTD bias so clear utd bought an injury prone defender , 18 or 19 defender , seria a striker with 12 or 13 goals, a psg reject for 50m. D window for you guys no needle movers here. We expect better from you lyes

[@pinealdreams1064]

Dude, your absolutely inability to use basic English or sense renders your comment obsolete. It's gibberish.

[@DoomsdaySlayer]

Arsenal are one Oshimen or Isak away from a world class team. Jesus and Havertz are not the players arsenal should be relying on to take them to that next level.

[@TYLOTYLOTYLO]

A C for Arsenal would have been crazy. Calafiori alone addressed a key problem last year and I think even if we only signed him considering his reputation in Italy would have been huge. Calafiori will start when he’s imbedded in. Merino is the Xhaka replacement we’ve needed and ultimately when fit he will begin to replace Partey. Sterling is just a market opportunity and an upgrade on Nelson. A striker. (We tried for Sesko remember) but he wanted to stay at Leipzig, would have made it an A+ for me. But ultimately players didnt want to move and some (Osimhen) think they’re better than they are Would have

[@JimJimma-r1x]

Overall Arsenal have stayed still this window. Yeah you’ve brought a few squad players in but your team hasn’t improved it’s just more consistent now. Your goal should be to improve your team as much as possible to pass Man City but all you really did was give other teams a chance to catch up. I think a C is fair it’s bang in the middle you didn’t improve you didn’t get worse it was just meh

[@fplfieco22]

C is average. Don't get fooled by Arsenal. They're not better than last and still haven't signed of striker, left back (Tierney is the only LB at Arsenal) or top tier player. A net spend of €26m says it all. I'm really disappointed as an Arsenal fan. 0 first team players. Calafiori is an unknown in the Prem, Merino looks like a good signing and Sterling is very average buisness compared to what they could have got and Arsenal fans have mostly disliked him for years. It's an OK window. Not a howler but nothing too exciting. Also Sesko wouldnt've have been a top tier signing imo either with huge risk at least in year 1. Buy quality buy once. Buy cheap buy twice

[@TChAriv1]

Putting Tottenham in A but chelsea is D is clearly disingenous to be honest. They clearly did the same thing, buying kids. Tottenham bought 1 player in solanke that is also a question mark on improving the team. The rest of their transfers are young kids ,questionmarks and can't even make the team. Its clear Chelsea have done it on a larger scale and have media coverage but to say tottenham had a good window is simply not true.

[@spinyslasher6586]

Lots of Chelsea fans mistakenly thinking attack was the main weakness last season. They're forgetting that their attack did settle by the end of the season. Palmer, Madueke, Nkunku all showed signs of improvement in finishing last season; even Jackson showed signs of improvement. The problem was defense, Chelsea lost tons of points conceding bad goals last season, and this season it's the same so far. Not a single clean sheet so far (in the league), the only clean sheet came against uhhhh... Servette?

[@ahmedd408]

Someone’s a lil mad Liverpool smoked his team😪

[@cerb12]

how tf is tottenham an A? they didn’t sign a dm or main wingers like they needed lol

[@DoomsdaySlayer]

Chelsea fans live in their own little delusional bubble. When will they ever understand that signing a lot of players doesn’t mean having a good transfer window? I swear they signed like 3 goalkeepers this window that they don’t even know what to do with.

[@houradm.419]

Estiavo only make Chelsea transfer A+

[@GGM28]

Chelsea a D? Damn

[@isaacmeister3179]

Chelsea had a WAY better window then United this is just delusional and agenda based😂😂😂

[@alncrts4936]

These Chelsea fans are quickly becoming the most annoying fans on the internet…

[@DarwinNunez-xv2tb]

United bit was pure cope lol

[@book2316]

You keep on repeating that Chelsea has spent £1.5 billion, are you insinuating that Chelsea has spent £1.5 billion this transfer window?

[@alncrts4936]

No. But the 1.5 billion adds context, and showcases Chelsea’s strategy of just throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. A strategy I and clearly many people don't respect.

[@pinealdreams1064]

He was referencing Chelsea's own comments about 'waiting four windows beofre judging'. Theyve spent 1.5 billion in those four windows. ​@@alncrts4936

[@camphipps10]

First comment is crazy COYS

[@Cynthia20043]

What he’s speaking fax

[@gudius]

Clueless

[@anas5847]

Too much talk for a bullshit biaised review, for anyone who's interested in an objective view this video isn't it, just save your time and stop watching

[@-I_am_Him-]

Liverpool don't need anyone. Gravenberch is enough for them. They have a better team and better players than city and arsenal

[@-I_am_Him-]

They can bring Endo off the bench if they need a dm. Mac allister and grav double pivot, 2 press resistant players, no one is getting the ball off them

[@nadiranaflous7451]

Do you actually believe u have a better squad than city , arsenal I agree but city u don’t got the defensive and midfield quality of depth

[@Section20Ul]

A better team than city... Hahah deluded

[@Vladi2102]

I am a Liverpool fan as well and there is no way we have better players than City. They beat us comfortably when it comes to overall quality. With Arsenal there is a conversation to be had, but overall squad I would give slight edge to Arsenal mainly because we will need a lot more changes in the near future to keep up the pace of City and Arsenal when our best players start to fade a bit (because Salah and VVD will be in their mid 30s in a year or two and Robbo is 30 and already is declining due to his crazy intense role under Jurgen before). Still, we have a great squad and potentially I might underrate few players still like Harvey who might explode, Gravenberch that is starting to show how good he can be when plays regularly and other young players in our squad yet to fulfil their potential. It will be very difficult to replace world class players like Alisson (with Mamardashvali maybe we solved that future issue, but who knows, Alisson is phenomenal), Salah, VVD, Robbo who probably lost his world class status, but still, so let's not get carried away too much.