Jeff's channel is a case study of getting more and more educated and increasing understanding of the evidence over time. Mad respect.
@burper-oe6tm2 ай бұрын
Progressive overload
@FitOneswithVarun4 ай бұрын
Jeff is dropping more papers than Benjamin Franklin
@hayesdelezene45904 ай бұрын
He better not go galavant in France and abandon us
@mattc42664 ай бұрын
Just like how you be sweeping comments about hersoyvac !
@hayesdelezene45904 ай бұрын
@@mattc4266 who’s hersoyvac my guy
@Matt.Conglomerate4 ай бұрын
Varun with the broom 🧹 Clean it up!
@Schrankle4 ай бұрын
The janitor of the fitness scene made sure that Hersovyac's closets (ideology and the other one) remains closed!
@Schlauchy4 ай бұрын
Jeff Nippard is just such a joy to watch. Such a bright, humble and hard working guy. Respect!
@horus44114 ай бұрын
Jeff really speaking facts, he really is changed a lot even from a year ago he is someone who is open minded
@TheHybrid3504 ай бұрын
Great collab. Really speaks to the quality of yours and Dr. Paks educations and work as researchers that Nippard is working with you guys. Also speaks to his desire for actual good research and pursuit of best practice we can have for lifting
@AYstrength4 ай бұрын
08:42 : How i look in my home mirror 08:52 : How i look in a car window
@jernej.skoflek4 ай бұрын
😅
@Just2Ddude4 ай бұрын
too real
@xX_dash_Xx4 ай бұрын
bruh I can't have one unique thing about myself. why tf does everyone think the same fucking thing in private 😭
@AYstrength4 ай бұрын
@hikenzankusen indifferent to woman? Dafuq is this mgtow BS
@Scion153 ай бұрын
@hikenzankusen wtf
@SenhorMsandiFelipe4 ай бұрын
At this point Jeff should do a research paper and get his PhD that he deserves. The guy already knows all the research done. Therefore, has identified a key research area
@ldgarnett7774 ай бұрын
“My name is Jeff” cracked me up 😂
@CinderBlock3313 ай бұрын
Personally I'd love more of this style of video. just like rapid fire Q&A with citations to support. Anyone that follows either of you two probably already knows most of this stuff intuitively at this point, but having it put succinctly in one video is very valuable, I think.
@jdanielortega4 ай бұрын
Please do a video showing how to properly execute lengthened partials for each muscle group
@TheHybrid3504 ай бұрын
Check the Playlist for this channel and there's a Playlist full of how to do workouts
@jdanielortega4 ай бұрын
@@TheHybrid350 Thank you for answering! But I see most of those videos focus on full ROM, but one standalone video that consolidates the proper full-lenghted partials of the top excerices he advises on would be good to have IMO.
@rockyevans15842 ай бұрын
@jdanielortega you just have to find a spot that indicates the end of the partial, anywhere between 1/3 and 2/3 of the full rom is fine
@cn01194 ай бұрын
Came for Jeff stayed for Jeff
@farmingthetnt80814 ай бұрын
You did what?🤨
@edwardsl05244 ай бұрын
no diddy
@cn01194 ай бұрын
I did what I did, boy
@alexmaples98803 ай бұрын
I never noticed how much jeff nippard sounds like ben shapiro. 😂
@ridhwankazi95033 ай бұрын
i just closed my eyes and pictured him and your right hooly
@bluecollargains4 ай бұрын
A dope discussion. I didn’t know Jeff was deep in the science like that but he actually knows his stuff 👌🏽
@gibbsm4 ай бұрын
oh, for sure, he's a super nerd about it. No degree, but you can't tell.
@brandall1013 ай бұрын
I thought that was his whole appeal? The science/evidence based approach to everything basically
@rockyevans15842 ай бұрын
@@brandall101I came to Jeff's nipples channel when I saw his gfs glutes in the thumbnail. Giggity
@Kaarajann4 ай бұрын
Two heavy weights of evidence based lifting science
@sircdrom3 ай бұрын
Fun convo! Jeff Nippard is the goat. Love that guy!
@azulsimmons10404 ай бұрын
This is why after all these years even with people making fun of him, I still listen to Nippard. He has very smart opinions concerning training with effort being more important than volume or intensity. You have to work the muscles with effort and with volume and intensity being knobs to turn while training with sufficient strain and effort to stimulate the body to grow stronger and bigger. Because ultimately the body is adapting to what it considers a necessary survival adaptation to an environmental stimulus as in getting bigger and stronger is necessary to do this thing which is threatening the body by causing it damage and consuming energy and nutrients. That is what it knows. Not that you're lifting weights to grow your muscle to look good on social media or the beach.
@nemo7542who2 ай бұрын
I'm subscribing to him now, but what do people make fun of him for?
@Jk-zv6tz3 ай бұрын
5:15 You check yourself out in the camera, realise the angle isn't great, so you lean forward and flex. XD
@DeePat-gd5so4 ай бұрын
Love me some Nippard. I am frugal with my hypertrophy dollars. Just cashed in on Nippard program. Support my boiy Jeff.
@kevincrittenden89614 ай бұрын
I didn't know Jeff ended all his statements with question marks
@tms2294 ай бұрын
LOL SAME! Bothered me a bit tbh.
@joeyb93964 ай бұрын
Canadian thing
@baranmelik69023 ай бұрын
He's trying to be respectful. Since Dr Milo is the clear expert, he's using a question intonation to say "is that true? would you agree with that?"
@Azaric4 ай бұрын
Thank you for that last bit. I have been on the same routine for about a year and I have been seeing gains in size and strength and didn’t see a reason to change it but had so many work out buddies tell me I needed to change it and “confuse the muscle.” Glad to hear there is little evidence for it outside of boredom.
@6reps4 ай бұрын
Closed book on the spot oral presentation is mental.
@Mvine19874 ай бұрын
Loved this collab..
@Professor-d5f4 ай бұрын
I love when Jeff and General Haffaz Aladeen (the Dictator) join together to discuss science. "- Niiiice"
@Yupppi4 ай бұрын
With the restricted feeding studies I've heard Dr. Trexler quote, and just guessing on evolutionary needs, I'd put my bet on protein timing really doesn't matter much cup. That being said I'd recommend spreading it on multiple meals for practicality, it's really ass to try and eat towards 130-180 grams protein in one meal. It makes for an awful digestion experience and awful day in general and even the food choices become weird. Non-scientific application. Fascinating how the old free powerlifting program by Greg Nuckols sounds a lot like the daily undulating periodization for muscle growth example in this context. Like let's say twice a week, one is your main lift at lower reps and the other is the accessory with a bit higher reps. It also fits the idea that the same exercise in same rep range can get exhausting for the joints and other structures as well as hypertrophy reasons. This was a cool video, Jeff being able to drop studies to support his opinions from the top of his head is pretty impressive for someone who didn't train in the field and science technically not being his job.
@vikdaddy4 ай бұрын
05:20 when Wolf looks at the camera and thinks he better flex those muscles
@Dolphchristiaan4 ай бұрын
Hahaha. Sharp noticed 😂
@JorgeHernandez-bz4ub4 ай бұрын
What muscles.?😂
@snakeace04 ай бұрын
@@JorgeHernandez-bz4ub Wolf is obviously above average in muscle mass for a natural lifter. I better hope that you arent on the juice as you desperately try to invalidate others achievements. Not a good look.
@contentkeeper87694 ай бұрын
@@JorgeHernandez-bz4ubikr lmao. Science based lifters are tiny…
@colbyscott85453 ай бұрын
@@contentkeeper8769 have you seen jeff...
@andrewpani28344 ай бұрын
This was amazing. As a lean, early-intermediate lifter this gives me lots of confidence that what I'm doing is "correct" and the obsession around optimization for an adult with kids and a job can be sub-optimal.
@michaelbarletta10244 ай бұрын
12:47 the editing here was top notch
@LeanAndMean444 ай бұрын
I love the reference
@StayMad264 ай бұрын
I would love a long term study about meal frequency for musce growth. Group A with most if not all protein in 1 big meal, Group B with it spread out evenly between 3 or 4 meals and then Group C that has 3-4 meals but with snacks in between that contain protein
@MHBlackAce4 ай бұрын
I wanna see them stand next to each other
@brandall1013 ай бұрын
One's short and one's tall. Shocker, I know.
@VernCrisler4 ай бұрын
On periodization. I actually pick out a couple of days a week to do more volume or more intensive training -- just because I'm trying to avoid injury. If I train like that every day, the risk of injury goes up -- so, I only do that a couple days a week. That means I was doing periodization without knowing it, more by instinct or feel rather than scientific knowledge. Great discussion.
@quangsumi4 ай бұрын
oh man, I can hear those science-based lifters talk all day. What a blessing from the lord
@ngatihonky4 ай бұрын
That was an excellent discussion. Do more of this original content rather than critiques of others...
@dimitrivforvictory2713 ай бұрын
As Arnold would say ‘yooo’vv got to shok da musssselll’
@Wolfuskaktus3 ай бұрын
Bro you legit look like gigachad
@lilcxxj4 ай бұрын
This was a dope crossover.
@shakir49694 ай бұрын
i feel like training hard is the way to go. Training to failure question often arises when someone is lazy enough and feel like they just want to get the heck out of the gym as soon as they reached there.
@ellipsis...19864 ай бұрын
That last citation got dangerously close to "My source? My source is I made it the fuck up." Great chat guys.
@ck-rd2ce3 ай бұрын
1-2 RIR seems to be the sweet spot for maximising muscle growth without the associated fatigue of going to failure
@butteranium4 ай бұрын
Am I the only who thinks there is some *chemistry* between these two? Sitting close to each other as well
@youngornitier4 ай бұрын
they definitely have some Fe going on together
@Washyourbellybutton4 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@EStephensII4 ай бұрын
It’s all about the beards and brains
@michaelbarletta10244 ай бұрын
Dr. Mike will be Jealous
@jeremyjjbrown4 ай бұрын
Jeff is gonna have to fight Dr Pak for that...
@Coach_WODYN3 ай бұрын
Enjoyed this one . BTW: I usually hate most "evidence based coaches", who cherry pick a research to prove their point or cherry pick research to stir the pot.
@KurokamiNajimi4 ай бұрын
That study with experienced lifters comparing failure to 2-1 RIR doesn’t convince me for several reasons. Imo the effectiveness of a session should be measured by how much your performance dropped from what it was at the start of the session. Why would someone with fatigued muscles be able to perform anywhere near what they could at the start? They gained too much muscle within the time frame of the experiment. They claimed the average was 7 years experience from what I remember including having done powerlifting and shows and they even recorded some sets. This all sounded promising on paper but there’s no one people that advanced are getting a 7% increase (at least if house of hypertrophy did his math right I tried finding the before and after stars myself in the paper couldn’t find them) in 8 weeks was it maybe it was a little more but point stands that’s a ridiculous increase Look at Basement Bodybuilding’s road to 18 inch arms series for example a guy who knows how to train better than the vast vast majority including the average advanced lifter. He has 9 years under his belt now I think and it took him 6 months to get a 1% increase to his arms Some explanations I have on why they got such a good increase in a short time frame is 1 they made everyone increase their volume midway through so it was a new stimulus 2 the failure group perhaps was doing too much to begin with that they couldn’t fully recover from (muscle wise not even CNS) because they were told to do the same amount of volume they’d normally do. When you go to failure total sets should be going down at least initially until you adapt to it. That in of itself is already gonna cause gains and the same for the 2-1 RIR group they probably weren’t use to being at an actual 2-1 RIR
@Johnpdf4 ай бұрын
I 100% agree with jeff nippard about volume I have tried all types of volume and rep ranges and my best gains have come from 8-10 weekly sets 4-9 rep range every exercise, I never have to deload my gains progress way faster
@samuelmeisterw4 ай бұрын
My name is Jeff
@SKINNY_BRUH4 ай бұрын
I realised that all this info is for free. Thank you Dr.Milo Wolf
@riguyisfly4 ай бұрын
why does this feel more like a quiz than an interview
@NonsenseTreasure4 ай бұрын
Probably because it is 🤷
@DeNiruable4 ай бұрын
Because it's set up as a knowledge test in other words a quiz
@Rezumi4 ай бұрын
Yeah, it felt like a big bro quizzing a little bro about life facts or something.
@gibbsm4 ай бұрын
It's literally a quiz, that's why.
@contentkeeper87694 ай бұрын
@@gibbsmLeast insane Science based lifter. Stay small kiddo
@boundaryscience4 ай бұрын
My mans got that Nightwing chest hair pattern.
@pd81704 ай бұрын
I am by no means a scientist nor am I popular workout influencer but I do lean towards science-based information and meta-analysis to fuel my workout programs therefore Mike and wolf and Jeff are the people that I tend to follow having said that it is so important to reinforce when getting into the weeds so deeply and so technically with these analysis is and data and that is the individual person and their genetics and their injuries Etc no matter how technical and Science and database you must do what works for you and that is generally an exercise with proper nutrition proper form and exercises that are definitely giving you growth and a pump but also are not causing you pain to do them properly therefore I will reinforce individualism as all three of these people whom I follow promote this is General outlines and information that is science-based and accurate but you must find out what works for you by trial and error and consistency
@GYMETRIUS4 ай бұрын
Dang, Milo, almost looking like you lift in this video 😮
@kunalbhat5914 ай бұрын
Dr. Wolf's name is justified with that chest hair
@ozzy61623 ай бұрын
I bet this is the kind of conversation sports science nerds have in the pub. 🤣
@mb32934 ай бұрын
Greetings from Germany 🇩🇪
@beto130594 ай бұрын
I'd love a video on periodizitation and the different kinds of it😊
@kapitankapow4 ай бұрын
In the battle of the beards, meelo woolf is mogging the nip
@Mikehates4 ай бұрын
Where'd this guy come from?? First Dr. Mike now Jeff!
@nygeek64714 ай бұрын
The two GOATs
@buffalowellnessАй бұрын
The discussion here, the respectful perspectives in such a peer to peer environment... well done.
@matusjurcik69744 ай бұрын
when I do just 8sets a week per muscle group I do everything to failure. If I would go for let say 15-20 sets/week I would do approx only 50-75% to failure. Other sets I would end up with 1-3 reps in a tank.
@WoTMike19893 ай бұрын
Personally even as someone who was a beginner again after a long break, adding volume was not that hard and definitely played a role in very quickly getting old gains back/newbie gains Allowed me to very quickly regain both strength and muscle and if I had not added that volume there is no way I could have safely continued to progressively overload to match the strength gains simply with reps or load additions. This is especially true for the large compound lifts where in the beginner to intermediate stage you have to be wary of your muscles outpacing your joints
@RichXVIII4 ай бұрын
Jeff Nippard sounds exactly like NileRed.
@GYMETRIUS4 ай бұрын
I think the more advanced you are, the LESS sets you need and can recover from as you can push yourself closer to failure and will be using much heavier weights.
@jackdemoguitar4 ай бұрын
Lengthened partials are more applicable on some exercises than others
@adamblackshaw91514 ай бұрын
Jeff is impressive.
@user-ii7xc1ry3x4 ай бұрын
Love the DYEL? in the backboard
@dernuniverse98133 ай бұрын
Biomechanics by Doug Brignole is the way
@seanfarrellforreal3 ай бұрын
Conclusion: Jeff has more fitness based scientific knowledge than Dr. Wolf. Mic drop.
@philippd88444 ай бұрын
Neeeeerrrrds!!! Love it! :D
@MHBlackAce4 ай бұрын
He actually said it
@Lancerris4 ай бұрын
S tier - wtf lets go that was insane
@KevinMcCarron4 ай бұрын
Jeff is throwing out more papers than MIA
@imbursting37204 ай бұрын
The answer around the 9min mark is pretty much perfect with the one cavate regarding 'novice' trainees: are they actually training? (You'd be amazed how many people who go to the gym 'three times a week' average 2-4 visits a month.)
@gibbsm4 ай бұрын
I'm one of those weirdos that actually goes three times a week, every week, like I say. Been going a 4th day lately to work on, lacking parts, which is really everything.
@gokukakarot18554 ай бұрын
For the algorithm
@LeanAndMean444 ай бұрын
Bro who gave Jeff such a short chair that’s bullying 😭
@nightingalelaurence60923 ай бұрын
I see Jeff, i press like.
@SarathChandran972 ай бұрын
Arnold and Franco in some universe.
@gibbsm4 ай бұрын
I'm at 26% body fat, I have built in calories to burn until about 18-20%
@pauldope9526Ай бұрын
I am willing to be a participant in any studies you guys conduct
@kwerby32854 ай бұрын
Citation: 💪
@adamlimbach67564 ай бұрын
You just can’t outprogram effort. It’s not that complicated.
@Wetterwet4 ай бұрын
I was under the impression that you need less volume as you get bigger and stronger as recovery will take longer
@Johnpdf4 ай бұрын
you do, people saying you need more are wrong, volume only stimulates growth to a certain point and the bigger you are the more volume negatively affects you
@Johnpdf4 ай бұрын
as you get more experienced you are able to recruit more motor units easily aswell so doing more volume just inhibits recovery with not much benefit
@VanillaCoke4 ай бұрын
14:22 Dr. Mike wants to know your location
@s987154 ай бұрын
Dr Mike doesn't recommend adding volume week to week. He recommends going closer to failure week to week (i.e. increasing intensity).
@VanillaCoke4 ай бұрын
@@s98715he recommends both. Get the hypertrophy app and you’ll see. We accumulate volume throughout the meso up until deload week
@Metalkake4 ай бұрын
Fucking fantastic video gentlemen 🤘
@kevinpurnell94654 ай бұрын
Jeff is just wrong on the relative effort vs volume discussion. We already know there’s very little difference between 1-3 RIR vs 0 RIR and we know that the dose response relationship with volume basically means + volume usually means + gains. The choice is obvious when you look at it like this no?
@alanESV24 ай бұрын
We also know that people can activate muscle fibers to different extents. So failure, if you can activate 50% of your biceps vs someone who can 30% is going to be very different. I had trouble activating my lats, failure wasn’t enough at all, however I could do one set of other muscles and got huge stimulus.
@kevinpurnell94654 ай бұрын
@@alanESV2 that makes sense and I agree as I’ve done the same thing just with my triceps on certain exercises. I still think that generally it’s the case that people should focus on increasing volume rather than their relative effort. This of course assumes that they are training sufficiently hard (1-3 RIR)
@Johnpdf4 ай бұрын
@@kevinpurnell9465 why would you increase volume when you can increase the stimulus on a per set basis having less muscle damage/fatigue overall so you are always recovered easily
@kabe61462 ай бұрын
Which programming is The best for grow SBD for advanced lifter
@5kribbles2 ай бұрын
One does not simply debunk the master
@josietremlin85783 ай бұрын
As a woman, who has never been in a dedicated surplus for muscle growth- what surplus %age is recommended and for what length of time? To Maximise muscle growth.
@JonSmith76764 ай бұрын
Very cool vid 👍
@Dankdalorde3 ай бұрын
I love you guys and Dr. Mike - y’all the real ones ❤
@jedinxf73 ай бұрын
what makes no sense to me about the frequency studies re: hypertrophy is that we know high frequency increases strength more in the short term (through neuromuscular adaptations, primarily), and more strength should allow you to progressively overload with higher weight for a higher growth stimulus faster - no? so for a short term hypertrophy cycle why wouldn't those short term strength adaptations have pay hypertrophy dividends at constant volume? is it the fatigue tradeoff?
@youteubakount44494 ай бұрын
Why is no one talking about "bulking 24h after training and cutting 24-48h after training" ? On average you're maintaining, but we know most growth occurs when you eat around the time you train + sleep after. What do you think? Realistically a lot of people find it extremely hard to lose weight for extended periods of time.
@intjrovert9611Ай бұрын
because after 24h you still need protein/calorie surplus to repair your damaged muscle from training
@youteubakount4449Ай бұрын
@@intjrovert9611 I agree with this. But could you say that you reaped most of the benefits? It's not optimal for muscle building for sure (otherwise we would just bulk), but if you're maintaining weight, I still don't see why it's not optimal to alternate +20% calorie intake and -20% calorie intake days, with the increased calorie intake starting 4h before training and ending 20h after training.
@justnoneshot2 ай бұрын
More videos with Jeff!
@raoul90164 ай бұрын
no way, the Furry and the Nipple discussion how to lift the iliac lat pulldown the right
@josephmoore9774 ай бұрын
My name is Yeff
@stumble_leiner2 ай бұрын
Wow Milo does that weird thing where he stares you right in the eye non stop when you don't look at him, and looks away for any actual eye contact. Just don't stare in someone's eyes when they're in close proximity, it's not difficult
@jdanielortega4 ай бұрын
Regarding Protein Intake: Is my Daily Protein Intake being synthesized to build the muscle I trained earlier today? or the one I trained yesterday? or the day before? or does synthesis take long enough for the protein I eat today to actually build the muscle I will train tomorrow?
@Wolf Coaching living up to the name, as hairy as it gets. Those follicles must have abused the lengthen partials 😂
@eddiegrant584 ай бұрын
Is combining high fat with high carbs during the same meal potentially bad? What about eating a high fat meal then a high carb meal a couple hours later then a high fat meal a couple hours later again? I have heard about the Randle Cycle but not sure if it applies to the latter scenario.
@xSports_Science4 ай бұрын
Hi Eddie! Ideally you want to have your higher fat meal relatively far away from your workout windows (it reduces proteins and carbs digestion rate). Higher carbs for pre-workout or intra workout is good. If you want to do high fat then high carb, make sure you schedule your high carb meals around activities which will require more energy than at other times during the day. You may also use high fat before bed time if you have trouble with hunger at night. Proteins should ideally be spread out equally between your 3-5 meals. You may reduce protein intake a bit in your pre workout and intra workout if you fear you'll be bloated. I'd say engineering your carb and protein schedule is more important than fat, so do what makes you feel best with your fats. Have fun pumping iron!
@gibbsm4 ай бұрын
depends on how many calories you're burning. Someone in Ranger school, Q Course, BUD/s, would still lose weight. I was in the military and I kinda out ran my shitty diet.
@flow11884 ай бұрын
Milo was not pleased about Jeffs answer for L Partials
@DrSiddiqui4 ай бұрын
Yes.
@VernCrisler4 ай бұрын
I've heard others say the same thing about LPs that Jeff does -- there's just not enough science yet about LPs, so don't give up full range of motion until we have better studies available..
@gibbsm4 ай бұрын
@@VernCrisler I take joint mobility into account, so I go full ROM, and last set can be partials full Hambone style, if I want. Prisoners use LPs and get jacked, so...
@simonemicucci92224 ай бұрын
Aggresive surplus sound too much like +500kcal from mantaining A real aggressive bulk wouldn't get over 300kcal extra to mantainence, or at least in the firsts month
@MONKEYDKEVIN4 ай бұрын
So if 1-3 RiR training is relatively equal to failure should I do 3 RiR training with more volume? I feel like that would maximize growth no? Because I'm taking no sets to true failure my fatigue should be low and my maximum recoverability should be high and I can put the rest of my energy into volume. This is making sense in my head but I would want to hear your thoughts on it.
@Johnpdf4 ай бұрын
it would be smarter to train 1rir or failure lower volume, mechanical tension is more important than volume, more muscle damage inhibits growth always prioritize effort over volume