J-20: Comparing China's secretive fighter jet to the F-22 & F-35

  Рет қаралды 1,031,739

Forces News

Forces News

Жыл бұрын

China's secretive J-20 'Mighty Dragon' fighter jet has gone on public display on the ground for the first time.
Entering service in 2017, the J-20 is China's answer to the US F-22 Raptor and one of the world's few fifth-generation warplanes.
We've compared the Chinese fighter jet to the F-22 and F-35 aircraft.
#j20 #f22 #f35 #forcesnews #china
More: www.forces.net/china/j20-vs-f...
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: forces.net
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: forcesnews...
Twitter: / forcesnews

Пікірлер: 1 500
@adamc2378
@adamc2378 Жыл бұрын
All 3 jets have different roles within the doctrine of their respective militaries. This is like comparing apples to oranges to bananas because they are all fruits.
@addygreen8919
@addygreen8919 Жыл бұрын
I prefer apples.
@kingdomofprussia9749
@kingdomofprussia9749 Жыл бұрын
I prefer all
@farrukhahmad555
@farrukhahmad555 Жыл бұрын
I Want Do Asset Manager, Asset Take Care, Accounts And Tax Manager I Do Work for you safe And Honestly
@djuanstanziola9882
@djuanstanziola9882 Жыл бұрын
1 day I got into an Orange fight with other kids, I prefer bananas 😂
@farrukhahmad555
@farrukhahmad555 Жыл бұрын
@@djuanstanziola9882 I do work for you with safely
@joosiekawk
@joosiekawk Жыл бұрын
correction: there are more J-20's in service than the F-22 today...there are over 200+ J-20's and more are being built. While the US has 170ish F-22? and that's it.
@aaron6493
@aaron6493 Жыл бұрын
200 🤣🤣🤣🤣 are they flying on their own. You need specialized pilots to do that.
@joosiekawk
@joosiekawk Жыл бұрын
@@aaron6493 there are more credible pilots than there are j-20s. As the j-20s are now undergoing mass-producing using the finalized ws-15 engine, expect to see at least half a thousand J-20s in the skies by 2035
@aaron6493
@aaron6493 Жыл бұрын
@@joosiekawk mass producing a plane that has engine issues? What "wise".
@aaron6493
@aaron6493 Жыл бұрын
@@joosiekawk the J20 is a great fighter but now the challenge starts with the next phase which is monitoring/improving/upgrades/tests etc. Even with new engines this is part of execution & improvement of all human-made technology on this planet. Something that the US has been doing for 20+ years with the Raptor F22 fleet. So China is 20 years behind in this phase in comparison with the USA. Again remember that the upgraded Raptors are 5+ th gen and J20 is still an early 5th gen in development. With development I do not mean production, but test/monitoring/improvements design/upgrades/tests etc.
@biochemwang2421
@biochemwang2421 Жыл бұрын
@@aaron6493 LOL, where did you get the news that Raptors are being upgraded?
@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm
@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm 4 ай бұрын
The J-20 actually has quite a few variants, not only does it have 2 and single seat variants, but it also has 3 different types of engines, when it was first made it used imported Russian engines (cant remember which one) and then transitioned to an upgraded WS-10 used on the J-10C and J-15 and now it uses the WS-15 engine.
@ado5182
@ado5182 3 ай бұрын
Its copy ru engines... ru engines is copy from FRA and US...very old engines
@pisablavatsky-cb3dd
@pisablavatsky-cb3dd 2 ай бұрын
Ok joker😂😂😂​@@ado5182
@user-ug4yr8er9g
@user-ug4yr8er9g 2 ай бұрын
​тебя скопировали с бабуина😂😂😂
@ado5182
@ado5182 2 ай бұрын
@@user-ug4yr8er9g я рад что ты показал какой ты дурак! Молодец. Но самое смешное что про авиацию ты нечего не знаешь
@user-ez6cl5rj1r
@user-ez6cl5rj1r 29 күн бұрын
​@@ado5182Sorry, the J20 in China uses the domestically developed and produced WS10 engine, and the latest Ws15 engine is also equipped in the latest batch of aircraft.
@tiredboss4209
@tiredboss4209 Жыл бұрын
To be honest, every time I see Indian netizens commenting on the poor quality of China's military industry, I find it funny. India is a country with very weak industrial capacity. Almost all industrial raw materials need to be imported from China, South Korea, Japan, Western Europe and the United States. The important components of military equipment come from Israel, Russia, Italy, Germany, South Korea and other countries. It is objective and rational to say that the quality of Chinese products 20 years ago was worrying. But today, China can produce almost all kinds of high-quality light industrial products, high-tech products, electronic products, heavy industrial products! It can also produce low-end light industrial products to earn money from the poor in third world countries. the indian's logical is very funny: Although there are 143 companies in the Fortune Global 500 from China and 7 from India, the CEOs of American technology companies are of Indian descent! Indian netizens: India wins! China's Mars rover is on Mars, and the lunar rover is on the moon. India only launched a small Mars probe, and the lunar rover was destroyed. Indian netizens: India's lunar exploration plan is 98% complete! Indian aerospace technology is higher than China! India wins! China is afraid of even Americans in high-tech fields such as 5G, artificial intelligence, supercomputers, quantum engineering, aerospace, but superpower India always feels inexplicably that China only has quantity and no quality. The scientific and technological strength of the United States can mock China like this. Even Japan and Germany we think we still need to learn from them humbly, but India? Who gave you confidence? God cow? Or the Ganges water with excessive E. coli? Be humble Indians! Every time the Indian media says "will", or gives some future goals, Indians are overjoyed, as if they have already done it, almost all comments like JAI, HIND! As for laught at China, I think a country with a population of 1.4 billion, GDP is only 3.5 trillion, per capita is 2000+, the hunger index ranks in more than 100, the number of malnourished children is the largest in the world, a country like this~how about just shut up and develop quietly, excellent expression of desire will not make your country strong, industrialize first, there are One day I want to boycott Indian products, I wish I could have such a chance~~🤣🤣
@Lucas12138
@Lucas12138 Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@user-ze3dt2td9q
@user-ze3dt2td9q Жыл бұрын
恒河的鬼、印度的嘴 😂
@yzfwing7439
@yzfwing7439 Жыл бұрын
印度人高兴就好
@xing-----7064
@xing-----7064 Жыл бұрын
印度的上限比日本,韩国,更高
@KKK-wh1sd
@KKK-wh1sd Жыл бұрын
兄弟,你太强了。
@beest_
@beest_ Жыл бұрын
Both can fly, beyond that it's like comparing apples with oranges.
@frank-ko6de
@frank-ko6de 2 ай бұрын
J-20 looks like a fake orange. Hahahaha.
@xiaoxiao-wk2mz
@xiaoxiao-wk2mz 3 күн бұрын
​​@@frank-ko6de因为太科幻的东西出现在现实会让你们觉得不可思议
@muzikizfun
@muzikizfun Жыл бұрын
The only thing that matters is what happens in combat. While reputation might deter or make an enemy hesitate, only combat can settle the issue.
@kopite8971
@kopite8971 Жыл бұрын
Exactly the battle of Britain, proof....
@jimmygeeraets9039
@jimmygeeraets9039 Жыл бұрын
@@kopite8971 the spitfire was a master piece. I dont think its the same.
@kopite8971
@kopite8971 Жыл бұрын
@@jimmygeeraets9039 in terms of more powerful aircraft and completely out numbered. I'd say so in terms of power doesn't always win. If you get my point
@kopite8971
@kopite8971 Жыл бұрын
@@jimmygeeraets9039 the spitfire was easier to manoeuvre and more agile but the German planes were probably the most powerful from that era, I'd just say we had better pilots and tactics.
@jimmygeeraets9039
@jimmygeeraets9039 Жыл бұрын
@@kopite8971You've got that right. the battle of britain was also won on several factors. good British secret service. aircraft crashing, the pilots who survived could be picked up from the English and returned to work. and a very good plane and more experienced pilots over longer periods of time. the Germans had a very poor intelligent network, they received a lot of misinformation and pilots lost them when they crashed in England and the surrounding area. . I also think that the BF 109 Messersmith was a less aircraft than the Spitfire more competitive with the Hawker Huracine. and the choice to move from military targets to civilian targets is what ultimately cost the Germans too much manpower.
@digitalkamran1
@digitalkamran1 Жыл бұрын
Does anyone know the trackname in this video???
@ronaldwang9838
@ronaldwang9838 5 ай бұрын
J-20's maximum speed is 2.55 Mach when equipped with WS-10C engines(China's state media once reported that J-20's pilot said J-20 flied 52 kilometers per minute. That is 2.55 Mach), J-20's maximum speed is 2.8 Mach when equipped with WS-15 engines. The total number of J-20 in service is more than 200 right now. Media revealed that production capacity of J-20 production lines is 120 per year.
@user-fs9kc1vo4o
@user-fs9kc1vo4o 4 ай бұрын
2.0
@Truth-will-prevail786
@Truth-will-prevail786 3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 What they showed in Afghanistan That's we all seee😂😂😂😂
@DaniHaldar-qk5zg
@DaniHaldar-qk5zg Ай бұрын
Chinese slave spotted...
@m.a3914
@m.a3914 3 күн бұрын
It is a mach 2 jet and the production rate is in the tens not hundreds.
@user-ln5pi6zp2t
@user-ln5pi6zp2t 2 ай бұрын
The J20 has front canards but the F20 and F35 do not use canards. It is a totally different design in aerodynamics. But strange that the commentator keeps saying there are similarities and China must have stolen data. In engineering there is a concept of convergence of design. That is given a set of physical and chemical principles to solve an engineering design problem the solution looks similar. For example bows and arrows. In prehistoric times with little or no communications, isolated countries or communities have bows and arrows. Although different in size, lengths and materials all bows and arrows look similar.
@johnghilduta3016
@johnghilduta3016 Ай бұрын
I like the concept “convergence of design “ and I knows for long time is absolutely true.
@pinkppagi8228
@pinkppagi8228 3 күн бұрын
Internal bay engineering is what they copy and pasted
@pinkppagi8228
@pinkppagi8228 3 күн бұрын
They are forced to used canadas and larger wing due to weak engine output
@m.a3914
@m.a3914 3 күн бұрын
Similarities from inside and not necessarily outside
@douginorlando6260
@douginorlando6260 Жыл бұрын
China must be working out strategies on how best to use combined mixes of J20, non stealth fighters, and old generation fighters converted into drones. And now add loyal drone wingman to the mix. Now add Various Missile load outs including future missiles under development. The last key variable is sensor networks on the ground, in the air and in orbit and ECM aircraft
@dfmrcv862
@dfmrcv862 Жыл бұрын
They might... But fact is, they're playing catch up... And I'd prefer we keep it that way.
@aaron6493
@aaron6493 Жыл бұрын
@@dfmrcv862 do you know the new laser tech of the US? There is no catch up. Nothing in the sky will survive.
@dfmrcv862
@dfmrcv862 Жыл бұрын
@@aaron6493 shhh!!! Don't tell Congress that! They'll get complacent and may demand cuts to defense!
@aaron6493
@aaron6493 Жыл бұрын
@@dfmrcv862 you should know that laser tech is by far cheaper than those missiles, so I am pretty sure congress would be eager to get rid of missiles tech.
@timfarley274
@timfarley274 Жыл бұрын
Their best strategy is to eject.
@scottfoster5817
@scottfoster5817 Жыл бұрын
Just an FYI - there are at least 150 J-20s in service at this time with some experts in Chinese military aviation believing there might be more than 200 now flying. I'm not sure where the 74 in-service number came from but that's not accurate.
@user-yi9ls5uf3v
@user-yi9ls5uf3v Жыл бұрын
240
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 9 ай бұрын
@@user-yi9ls5uf3v vs 1000 F-35
@jefflai6077
@jefflai6077 3 ай бұрын
​@@SelfProclaimedEmperorthe 1000 F35s are not in one place, how many you can gather at one time.😂😂😂
@jeepkile8918
@jeepkile8918 20 күн бұрын
Only 74 are functional at the moment. The Chinese are starting to understand that water is not as combustible as jet fuel.
@Spikyzzzz
@Spikyzzzz Жыл бұрын
Still better than Russia
@justice32legends
@justice32legends Жыл бұрын
Way better actually. But canards, really?
@GLORY-TO-ENTROPY
@GLORY-TO-ENTROPY Жыл бұрын
@@justice32legends why? It looks cool
@milanradovanovic3693
@milanradovanovic3693 Жыл бұрын
Better by what measure? The fact that you amateurs watched for years how US propaganda showed you how 5th gen plane looks like? Are you people aware that none of these planes, 5th gen, can enter any kind of fight with su35 and exit alive. Su 35 has rockets almost 400 kms range, and about dog fight dont wanna discuss. Some un important measure like radar crosssection has been lifted like a diety... And thats radio electronics engeneer talking that is me
@penguinxed
@penguinxed Жыл бұрын
anything is better than Russia
@milanradovanovic3693
@milanradovanovic3693 Жыл бұрын
@@penguinxed Yes for those of you educated by CNN and Hollywood i agree. Now that you have nuclear scientist into Biden's stuff which are not just trans but also have sex with animals you Will definetly fight your way into prosperity
@phooogle
@phooogle Жыл бұрын
"In the end any fight could come down to the individual skill of pilots on both sides" Good job that the Chinese have ex-RAF pilots teaching them then, eh? :-/
@into_the_void
@into_the_void Жыл бұрын
And legally too....
@phooogle
@phooogle Жыл бұрын
@@into_the_void Hope that gets changed ASAP.
@CtrlOptDel
@CtrlOptDel Жыл бұрын
@@into_the_void While them working there may be legal, there are certain three-character agencies that won’t hesitate to resort to… less legal means to stop them working there.
@db-dl3nu
@db-dl3nu Жыл бұрын
@@CtrlOptDelmeaning?
@CtrlOptDel
@CtrlOptDel Жыл бұрын
@@db-dl3nu Take a guess… also colloquially referred to as a “wild stab in the dark”… 🤫
@nbgoodiscore1303
@nbgoodiscore1303 Жыл бұрын
Same exact speed? "Nah, It must have been the wind"
@bussolini6307
@bussolini6307 Жыл бұрын
there is way more than 74 units of J-20 in service, probably around 150-200.
@thunderwrld
@thunderwrld Жыл бұрын
Nope there's around 80 lol
@GoldenKhanate06
@GoldenKhanate06 Жыл бұрын
@@thunderwrld Lol because you counted them youself right?
@yuhuagao4858
@yuhuagao4858 Жыл бұрын
最少300。
@codelessunlimited7701
@codelessunlimited7701 Жыл бұрын
Both aircraft was never tested in real life scenario. China wins this one because of its long range capabilities. The Chinese aircraft seems to get a lot from the Russian technology and engineering. But it is good to see a new aircraft and does not need an entire GDP of the country to fund the program.
@eugenenunn4900
@eugenenunn4900 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese win nothing. Inferior stealth and air-to-air missiles. They also lack number and pilot training.
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 9 ай бұрын
Uh, no. Long range missiles mean nothing if you cant see your enemy. The J-20 is like 20 feet longer than the F-22...F-22 will see J-20 long before J-20 can see the F-22.
@darkevola7975
@darkevola7975 5 ай бұрын
except that China can only develop such technologies by copying other projects as there's not a single shred of innovation in the Chinese gene 😂😂. must be the effect of eating all those urine soaked eggs after all.
@michaelwan4268
@michaelwan4268 4 ай бұрын
You can not only rely on Airplane to detect stealth fighter. @@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@jb76489
@jb76489 3 ай бұрын
Wow you really don’t understand what you’re talking about lmao
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
China currently has over 120 J20 in service, not just 74. They have equipped over 5 air combat wings with J20, 24 per wing, that makes it at least 120, some say around 150 were already delivered so far.
@aztronomy7457
@aztronomy7457 Жыл бұрын
KZbin is illegal in China
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
@@aztronomy7457 I am a Canadian.
@johnsun3299
@johnsun3299 Жыл бұрын
It's estimated more than 200 recently
@duyataksis5210
@duyataksis5210 Жыл бұрын
@@johnsun3299 Yes, at least 208 to be precise.
@goodyiwen
@goodyiwen Жыл бұрын
看珠海航展,J20机尾的量产编号,目前超过200台是妥妥的
@crypty9365
@crypty9365 Жыл бұрын
As a Chinese person, I must say the J20 is getting close to F-22, but F-22 was built over 20 years ago, there must be new advanced fighter jets already developed by the US military, so there is no need to argue at air superiority at this time.
@akk9196
@akk9196 Жыл бұрын
They had trouble shooting down your balloons, y'all are safe. If goat herders in Hiluxes can best them, you'll have no problem reclaiming Taiwan without having to shoot a single bullet.
@crypty9365
@crypty9365 Жыл бұрын
@@akk9196 lol thats funny
@thyhandsonuslyngdoh6562
@thyhandsonuslyngdoh6562 6 ай бұрын
​@@akk9196Can you compare the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the United States operation in Afghanistan. No you definitely cannot. America's was there to help the Afghan government and usually carried out small operations or air operations against Taliban targets. The Taliban got their ass kicked and had to hightail it to Pakistan (who provide shelter, weapons).
@darkevola7975
@darkevola7975 5 ай бұрын
@@akk9196Lmao, a china simp arguing with an actual chinese. You are so desperate to prove China can even match US that you argue with a chinese guy. And goat herders didnt win, the americans simply left. And the chinese have been beaten by filipinos, indians, vietnamese in just the past 30 years bro. Taiwan will only need a tenth of its air force to drown the entire chinese air force.
@rmstark1966
@rmstark1966 5 ай бұрын
Actually they keep updating the F22. Because of lack of stealth in the J20 is very comparable. With the J20 and F35 hardly have a payload unless they carry under wings and lose all stealth. F22 carries more in the belly. The range of the radar of J20 and F22 are close, F22 has 200km, J20 has 170km. At their speeds that is mute point. I have always said even with crappy range of flight, I would still take a Raptor over the others
@taichitao85
@taichitao85 Жыл бұрын
Better tech + Skill + luck = winner
@parthasdasgupta
@parthasdasgupta Жыл бұрын
I think it's a very sleek plane. Look wise awesome. I am not a technical guy but engine nozzles are not covered! How they minimize IR signatures? Can anyone please elaborate.
@tdolan500
@tdolan500 Жыл бұрын
Common theme with Chinese and Russian “stealth” aircraft. Have the outward appearance of having stealth features but are missing the less glamorous details such as the correct nozzles, frameless canopies etc. I feel these aircraft are produced for the purpose of optics rather than having a major military value. The reality is the US is still decades ahead in technology and capability.
@parthasdasgupta
@parthasdasgupta Жыл бұрын
@@tdolan500 Thank you Sir.
@parthasdasgupta
@parthasdasgupta Жыл бұрын
@@robertm5160 Sir IR missiles don't follow exhaust of a jet engine. It track hot part of it. Part of the J20's engine is exposed and thus easier for IR missiles to track. F35's engine nozzle is also open. ( otherwise how the gas will pass) but beside the nozzle no other part is exposed. So lesser IR signature. I think you also know that.
@Emphasis213
@Emphasis213 Жыл бұрын
The nozzles do have stealth features. If you look closely it has serrations to reflect some of the RF. Also it is not like the f22 because round nozzles are more efficient. They are maximizing the power from the engines by leaving the nozzles round.
@paullittizzio234
@paullittizzio234 5 ай бұрын
The Raptor's engines are probably extremely efficient, as well as an order of magnitude more stealthy than any round nozzles out there... which is basically everything OTHER than a -22. If there was any sort of tangible efficiency issue, it doesn't seem that any the countries that are trying to develop rectangular nozzles care much about it.
@stevenmiller6001
@stevenmiller6001 Жыл бұрын
that's so good looking Jet oh my gosh .
@uktenatsila9168
@uktenatsila9168 Жыл бұрын
Is the max range of the J20 confirmed? Thank you for the great videos.
@Mishn0
@Mishn0 Жыл бұрын
We're talking the CCP here. You just have to take their word for it!
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
China currently has over 120 J20 in service, not just 74. They have equipped over 5 air combat wings with J20, 24 per wing, that makes it at least 120, some say around 150 were already delivered so far.
@ddavid1072
@ddavid1072 Жыл бұрын
@@thejeffinvade 只要中国军方愿意,生产1000架都可以,中国美国不同,中国的这些飞机制造商全部是国营的,即使不盈利也没关系,美国的军工恐怕不行。
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
@@ddavid1072 波音2018年最强的时候,一年交付了806架飞机,平均每月70架 中国商飞,唯一一款量产的"大飞机"ARJ21(其实只是个支线客机),2008年首飞,快15年了,17年开始量产,量产也6年了,一共交付了70架,产量差不多每月1架,而且只是个支线客机,比波音交付的要小得多 航空业产能差了两个数量级,还是不要号称1000架的比较好
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
@@ddavid1072 1,固定翼舰载机:美国有850+架F18,50多架F35B/C;中国50架歼15,数量不到美国1/10,而且歼15没有相控阵雷达,战力还没有美国海军的1/10 2,战略轰炸机,美国70架B52,60架B1b,20架B2,都能从美国本土起飞打击中国;中国0 3,攻击型核潜艇,美国71艘;中国10艘。数量上差不多是1/7,战斗力不到1/7。 4,大运:美国220架C17,50架C5;中国40架运20+20多架伊尔76,单个载重量还比C17小20%,只有C5的1/3。 5,隐身战机,美国182架F22+500多架F35;中国150架歼20。歼20首飞10年,还在等发动机,如今只装备了四个团 中国歼20,首飞十年一共生产了150架。F35,洛马去年一年生产了142架,今年8月交付了第800架.
@theratrace5826
@theratrace5826 Жыл бұрын
Key phrase: on the ground. Dollars to donuts this plane vaporware.
@didip5602
@didip5602 3 ай бұрын
The external appearance can be imitated, but it is not easy to imitate the technology, because aircraft or combat equipment is not about the appearance but the technology used.
@ashravicmehmet6055
@ashravicmehmet6055 Жыл бұрын
Some people said that J20 is developed to disable or attack any control tower planes. Especially the one that controls advanced jets like F22 and F35. Pretty smart.
@sjqncn
@sjqncn Жыл бұрын
Well we use J-16D to do something like this...though it can't control anything
@DKLGalactus5
@DKLGalactus5 10 ай бұрын
It may turn out to be a Tofu plane. China never tells the truth, does it.
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 9 ай бұрын
F-22 has powerful radar, it doesn't need any aircraft to see or control for it.
@wedmunds
@wedmunds 6 ай бұрын
​@@SelfProclaimedEmperoractivate your radar and you deactivate your stealth
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 6 ай бұрын
@@wedmunds maybe Chinese aircraft have that problem, but the F-22 and F-35 have a special radar that is "low probability of intercept", its very unlikely the enemy can see it and that it would compromise their stealth.
@mslc22
@mslc22 Жыл бұрын
It is funny to think that some westerners include some asian living in the west is still dont believe j20 exists 😅.
@ajoo129
@ajoo129 7 ай бұрын
The thing is the J20 is designed to do dogfight, while the F22 is designed to kill the enemy fighters from far away..... You can't compare an apple to an orange....
@bobsmith3983
@bobsmith3983 3 ай бұрын
The J-20's PL15 missile which has a AESA radar seeker far outranges anything the west has so the F-22 can't even get close enough to launch its AAMRAM.
@ajoo129
@ajoo129 3 ай бұрын
@@bobsmith3983 but F22 stealth capabilities so good that only few planes could detect it..... also chinese / russians and US has different doctrine, i already mention the doctrine on the main comment Both good anyway, so it's depends on the pilot's skills....
@awaisali9596
@awaisali9596 Жыл бұрын
The air defence controlling the whole fight plays an equal role for the fight as much as a pilot does so its not only pilot skills.
@SteDews
@SteDews Жыл бұрын
Combat range 1100 miles? im smelling some bull there
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
More like fighter jet ferry range
@aztronomy7457
@aztronomy7457 Жыл бұрын
@@thejeffinvade bot spotted
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
@@aztronomy7457 SMH...... At least you can try to be more substantive than that.
@aztronomy7457
@aztronomy7457 Жыл бұрын
@@thejeffinvade keep up the spying
@fredbyoutubing
@fredbyoutubing Жыл бұрын
Maybe the Chinese military don't count the return trip 🤷‍♂
@jackwhitetron
@jackwhitetron Жыл бұрын
Hopefully it performs better than it looks
@americannumber2
@americannumber2 Жыл бұрын
Nothing about the jet but how the hell did they develop it last 10 years
@francishubertovasquez956
@francishubertovasquez956 Жыл бұрын
The J-20 Stealth Fighter Jet of China is a clear long range fighter Jet of China due to its large frame and larger fuel tank with one of the World's long range missiles if not the longest range missiles the PL-15 much longer range than Europe's Meteor missiles though the Meteor is more advanced. The radars and sensors of J-20 is classified, a secret they maintained until it is used in combat. Will the China- India conflict uncover the capability of J-20 Stealth fighter jet if it's used in that battle arena.
@biochemwang2421
@biochemwang2421 Жыл бұрын
Well, an Indian media claimed that Su30-MKI can easily detect J-20s over the border with its radar. What a joke.
@MrDocbowman
@MrDocbowman Жыл бұрын
J-20 is junk after Russia tech was used in them. Guidance system is vulnerable.
@kisuke47
@kisuke47 Жыл бұрын
@@biochemwang2421 That is because the J-20's had their radar reflectors on. They would only take them off during combat, so of course they could be easily detected.
@Withnail1969
@Withnail1969 11 ай бұрын
It is designed to fight America and will be used in that role if anywhere.
@zhangmengmin5645
@zhangmengmin5645 7 ай бұрын
@@biochemwang2421 Apparently, Indians don’t know about Longbo lens yet
@allgood6760
@allgood6760 Жыл бұрын
Cool vid👍✈️
@joesc641
@joesc641 9 ай бұрын
F-22 F-35 & J20 are all old tech compared to what Lockheed Martin is working on today. It would be near impossible to hack Skunk Works proprietary computers today. Only way to copy it, is to take pictures of it while its flying.
@Lightning206
@Lightning206 Жыл бұрын
Clearly the f-22 isn't secret enough if the j-20 has similar air frame parts
@brandongriffin79
@brandongriffin79 Жыл бұрын
Stolen technology bum
@PatrickF7
@PatrickF7 3 ай бұрын
similar???
@srs6461
@srs6461 2 ай бұрын
It does not look similar at all.
@CatDaddySteve
@CatDaddySteve Жыл бұрын
SPEED: The 60 year old F104 is faster than ALL modern fighters, you do NOT need speed as much as long range multi target radar , stealth, multiple fighter- command & control linking, and maneuverability, oh and redundant - reliability.
@into_the_void
@into_the_void Жыл бұрын
The f104 did mach 2.1 at the most Even the f15 can do mach 2.5 There are many operational jets that can fly faster than the f104
@michaelanderson9140
@michaelanderson9140 Жыл бұрын
MiG 31 anyone?
@XkriskrossX
@XkriskrossX Жыл бұрын
YF-12 says hi..
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
@@XkriskrossX DF17 says hi
@roguebanana87
@roguebanana87 Жыл бұрын
Speed=friction=heat. A hot airplane is not a stealthy airplane
@tiagopatricio3805
@tiagopatricio3805 Жыл бұрын
There are 170 J-20 in service as of 2022
@aaron6493
@aaron6493 Жыл бұрын
Anyone noticed the instability of the J20 prior to take off???
@aaron6493
@aaron6493 Жыл бұрын
Look at 20 seconds and up in the video.
@garyeuscher4499
@garyeuscher4499 3 ай бұрын
Yes, it has plastic all over it. J-20 is good for 5 hours of flight, then it is scrapped
@a88304
@a88304 Жыл бұрын
The honest answer? Who knows? They’ll probably never engage eachother and until that happens we won’t know their potential
@timmcpherson9632
@timmcpherson9632 Жыл бұрын
When you order an F-22 Raptor from your wish list...🙂 But get the J-20 instead, without the possibility of a refund. 🙆🏼‍♂️
@Spiretail
@Spiretail Жыл бұрын
Mom, can we have F-22? No. There is F-22 at home. F22 at home =
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
J 20 has F35 style EOTS which will make a big difference in helping them spot F22 first. Assuming both sides will not open their radar which will give away their position, and awacs on both sides can't spot incoming flighters until it's too late
@srijanme
@srijanme Жыл бұрын
Are you seriously bragging about 80s tech? Lol
@timmcpherson9632
@timmcpherson9632 Жыл бұрын
@@srijanme It takes years to build a fighter jet, from the drawing board to conception, and other things in between. Well....guess I shouldn't expect you to understand that!
@songyotmaboon7941
@songyotmaboon7941 Жыл бұрын
The overpriced extrem sensible against dust and not produced f22 , that pilots calls the hangar queen because only 14 percent are combat ready , the rest in repair ?
@paullittizzio234
@paullittizzio234 9 ай бұрын
It's a shame that the true cost of the F-35 extends all the way now into the complete loss of overwhelming dominance, from just a few short years ago. With the MUCH longer-raged J-20, and no F-22 in production, the tech that tax payers have paid hundreds of billions to develop now struggles to stay current in a jet still heavily under development, as J-20 production rates soar. There should be no need for a mad-rush to get to 6th-gen, yet that's what it seems we are faced with - And with quoted costs of several hundred mill a piece, and intended production runs of 200 aircraft, it also looks like the value of quantity in the quality vs. quantity conundrum is heading to near-0. Seems like nothing has been truly learned from the F-35, there's way too much fascination with its wiz-bangs for the powers-that-be to acknowledge that the cost of this program is not an $80M aircraft... It is much, much higher. 4th-gen fighters' service lives have had to be extended to make up for the time spent with a ridiculous all-eggs-in-one-basket approach - As has been said many times before, the F-35 is a great Strike aircraft, with some amazing tech/capabilities - But that tech has come at an incredible price, in both $$$ and time... And production rates now are stalling out as the realization sets in that 20+ years into dev, MAJOR upgrades/tech need to be accomplished just to get to the baseline capabilities that should be non-starters. If the F-35 delivers EVERY capability promised and the J-20 lags behind in sensor tech and avionics as the F-35 Club insists, then there should be no rush to get to 6th-gen. But based on at least its stealthy outline, long range, good payload, good maneuverability, and now engines to challenge F119 engine performance, BOTH of those conditions would need to be met in order for F-35 to cope with the threat of J-20. Here's to hoping the F-35 fan club is right, because if they're wrong on any of it, the J-20 WOULD be a problem.
@sean70729
@sean70729 3 ай бұрын
No worries the NGAD fighter will be in service before the end of this decade and obsolete the J-20 even more than the F-22 already does and it will be much larger than even the J-20 and will have 6th generation combined cycle engines putting China right back to being 30 years behind and their economy can no longer support the rapid development 9f the 2000s
@XIVI_SRN
@XIVI_SRN 4 ай бұрын
The new paint job is really nice, Looks kinda scifi with the metallic surface
@isthisshabab4561
@isthisshabab4561 Жыл бұрын
F-35's works like drone swarms and that is what makes it superior
@lktan224
@lktan224 Жыл бұрын
Yes it has a submarine mode too.
@isthisshabab4561
@isthisshabab4561 Жыл бұрын
@@lktan224 don't be afraid, experts know way more than I do. I'm not exposing any secrets
@ridhobaihaqi144
@ridhobaihaqi144 Жыл бұрын
Damn! My social credits +1000 points because likes this jet fighter.
@dangal9366
@dangal9366 2 күн бұрын
Judging by my coil packs and tie rods that lasted a year, not well.
@timbarnes2259
@timbarnes2259 Жыл бұрын
Obsolete Farsical Vehicles which can be easily destroyed with hypersonic negative heat fracture weapons..
@justsaythewordzoinks3896
@justsaythewordzoinks3896 Жыл бұрын
Mach 2.25? I thought f22's top speed was classified. I'm guessing its definitely over mach 3. Also j20 operational numbers are not 74 but over 100 according to many sources.
@pell9538
@pell9538 Жыл бұрын
Seriously doubt its mach 3, the f22 wasnt made for speed while aircraft like the f15 were meant to be speedy but are still only Mach 2 aircraft, the only mach 3 combat jets in service are mig-31's as far as i can tell and they made huge sacrifices to preformance in order to achieve that speed.
@yuhuagao4858
@yuhuagao4858 Жыл бұрын
300
@biochemwang2421
@biochemwang2421 Жыл бұрын
Well, if an airplane has top speed over Mach 3, it will not shape like F-22 or J-20. It will have to have narrow delta wings. Simple physics.
@user-yi9ls5uf3v
@user-yi9ls5uf3v Жыл бұрын
J-20 is 2.8
@bobsmith3983
@bobsmith3983 3 ай бұрын
The F-22 can't do mach 3 as the engines do not have enough thrust.
@seycheles27
@seycheles27 Жыл бұрын
That thing is huge. It will be as stealthy as a school bus.
@ProAvgeek6328
@ProAvgeek6328 Жыл бұрын
wtf? size does not mean bad stealth!
@jasonlee148
@jasonlee148 Жыл бұрын
By that logic militaries should be using amazon drones to carry out strike and bombing missions .
@JohnDoe-jp4em
@JohnDoe-jp4em Жыл бұрын
The B-2 is twice as big and very stealthy, and the F-22 is just a meter shorter.
@adamc2378
@adamc2378 Жыл бұрын
truly living up to your name
@simonwoess5679
@simonwoess5679 Жыл бұрын
1:06 an far as i know there are at least 150 of them some sources even cailming over 200 The number shown here is at least 3 years old
@telchinealucard8055
@telchinealucard8055 3 ай бұрын
The numbers has increased
@duyataksis5210
@duyataksis5210 Жыл бұрын
There are 187 F-22s, not 123. There are also 208 J-20s, not 74. Given your poor sourcing overall, one is deeply skeptical of your claim that the J-20's stealth is inferior to any American plane.
@dominikvonlavante6113
@dominikvonlavante6113 Жыл бұрын
It is a certainty that J-20's radar cross section is somewhat better than an F18/F15, but orders if magnitude worse than an F22/F35. This can be seen in the general geometry of the airplane, surface features and its turbine intakes.
@duyataksis5210
@duyataksis5210 Жыл бұрын
@@matthewochoa6973 No, I think China can easily match the US in stealth overall. You need to recalibrate your ideas of what China is capable of.
@duyataksis5210
@duyataksis5210 Жыл бұрын
@@dominikvonlavante6113 Wrong. The J-20 is a VLO air superiority fighter whose RCS easily matches the F-22/F-35.
@elektrotehnik94
@elektrotehnik94 Жыл бұрын
@@duyataksis5210 Your anti-America, pro-China & pro-Russia "empty convictions" can be even found through a simple Google search. That's impressive & very sad. A lof of bark, very little source data to back it up - as you do. It's just sad.
@garyeuscher4499
@garyeuscher4499 3 ай бұрын
No
@robam3801
@robam3801 Жыл бұрын
if its made by the same people and with the same care and attention as my toaster is we need not worry
@ceesj.m.lanting2669
@ceesj.m.lanting2669 Жыл бұрын
How about your iPhone or PC ?
@zwen3763
@zwen3763 Жыл бұрын
The factory don't decide what to make, the customers do. Pay up, we got you covered. Don't be a cheap ass no more.
@garyeuscher4499
@garyeuscher4499 3 ай бұрын
Designed and chips not made in China. Assembled in China So what
@rf8003
@rf8003 Жыл бұрын
Its more likely to be 4.5 gem...
@markymark3572
@markymark3572 Жыл бұрын
It's RCS looks huge
@hortik
@hortik 3 ай бұрын
Does it really maneuver that fast? 😮
@tinto278
@tinto278 Жыл бұрын
J-20 primary mission is for taking out US, Japanese and Australian AWACS's and Tankers. WVR or "Within Visual Range" is its second mission and its too heavy and fat to do it well.
@l.a.xgunner
@l.a.xgunner Жыл бұрын
Same with the Russia A2A missiles. Most of their newer models were designed to knock out Western AWACS.
@KTK-o
@KTK-o Жыл бұрын
It's still lighter than the F15 so I don't see exactly why it can't do well in WVR, whats it's bigger problem is actually is the lack of a cannon for dogfighting
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
J20 is more of a hybrid between an attack aircraft and a flighter. Since China doesn't have stealth bombers yet, they will have a great role to play on air to surface attacks.
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
J 20 has F35 style EOTS which will make a big difference in helping them spot F22 first. Assuming both sides will not open their radar which will give away their position, and awacs on both sides can't spot incoming flighters until it's too late.
@aztronomy7457
@aztronomy7457 Жыл бұрын
@@thejeffinvade youtube is illegal in China
@GameplayTubeYT
@GameplayTubeYT Жыл бұрын
They also copy Russian Mig 144
@bobsmith3983
@bobsmith3983 3 ай бұрын
You guys can't make you minds up, is a copy of the F-22 or the MIG 1.44?
@GameplayTubeYT
@GameplayTubeYT 3 ай бұрын
@@bobsmith3983 airframe of Mig 144 with f22 Stealth Characteristics.
@user-gx3zx4zo9m
@user-gx3zx4zo9m 2 ай бұрын
​@@GameplayTubeYTJ20实际上是从J10战机的基础上研发出来的,包括他的飞控系统都是从J10数据的基础上改进的,再融合隐身,双发,鸭翼,长航程等指标后,最终在风洞中吹出来的气动外形。整个研发过程根本就和和F22或者Mig1.44没有任何关系。
@DevoST7972
@DevoST7972 Жыл бұрын
Military fighters that still have people in them are just for show these days
@niu64
@niu64 3 ай бұрын
"It is not the martial art that matter, but the master" -Bruce Lee
@Absolut531kmh
@Absolut531kmh Жыл бұрын
All j20, f22 and f35 is different In terms of roles. J20: long range fighter F22: aggressive dogfight fighter F35: b2 spirit but less bombs and faster.
@hedgeearthridge6807
@hedgeearthridge6807 Жыл бұрын
The F-35 doesn't even need to ever dogfight, it can destroy threats from an entirely different country before they even know they're under attack, like happened in the Iran-Iraq War. It's like a mini B2 with better stealth, that can use the best missiles the world currently has. I heard it's an absolute nightmare trying to get new-ish missiles to work with old planes, especially the F-16.
@byhyew
@byhyew Жыл бұрын
@@hedgeearthridge6807 The American Pacific Command would argue otherwise. They did mentioned how their F35s were intercepted by J20s. So not so much about undetectable.
@kiro9257
@kiro9257 Жыл бұрын
@@byhyewI believe all LO aircrafts in peacetime have Luneberg lenses installed in the fuselage to avoid proper reading of the RCS. I think this is the reason why the Indians saw the J-20, the Americans with the J-20 and vise versa for the Chinese. It makes sense actually since there’s no reason to reveal your cards when there’s no reason to do so.
@Silicon12340
@Silicon12340 Жыл бұрын
F-22 is not meant for dogfights. It's for air superiority mainly
@Absolut531kmh
@Absolut531kmh Жыл бұрын
@@Silicon12340 Though it's the best dogfighter out of the three that's what I'm tryna say
@Ianmundo
@Ianmundo Жыл бұрын
for a BVM engagement this is a potent machine, but the sensor fusion of the F35 and dogfighting ability of the F22 would absolutely wreck this giant lump
@Withnail1969
@Withnail1969 11 ай бұрын
I doubt it. It would just outrange those planes and shoot them down with long range missiles.
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 9 ай бұрын
@@Withnail1969 Uh...no. Longer range missiles mean nothing if you cant see your enemy. The F-22 has a RCS of a marble, J-20 has the RCS of a truck tire. F-22 will fire first and leave before J-20 can shoot back.
@Withnail1969
@Withnail1969 9 ай бұрын
@@SelfProclaimedEmperor oh come on, nobody believes that nonsense. The F22 is visible on radar and China's missiles greatly outrange anything the F22 has. But that doesnt even matter. Know what the J20's primary target is? The fuel tanker planes. They'll shoot those down and the F22s will never reach China.
@syrez156
@syrez156 3 ай бұрын
​@Withnail1969 do you even know what you're talking about???
@polcore443
@polcore443 12 күн бұрын
F22 has many faulty issues that can not be fixed.
@BravoCheesecake
@BravoCheesecake Жыл бұрын
Oh yeah, those are the ones they build in fields right?
@DeanPattrick
@DeanPattrick Жыл бұрын
Maverick: It’s not the plane, it’s the pilot 😉😎
@jesusgutierrez6041
@jesusgutierrez6041 Жыл бұрын
That movie is so corny though
@nnnnnnn12388
@nnnnnnn12388 Жыл бұрын
U mean actor
@bobsmith3983
@bobsmith3983 3 ай бұрын
Nonsense, it's the missiles.
@joselee9605
@joselee9605 Жыл бұрын
The US is strong because their people worked hard. To compete with China , every person in the US has to pull the weight of 4 Chinese people. And now, considering the modern generation in the comment section is still relying on the head start given to them by previous generations guarantees they will lose that head start .
@englishparcc1989
@englishparcc1989 Жыл бұрын
Well, the US is stronger than China also because it didn't have its country destroyed by WW2 and a civil war immediately afterwards, and before that centuries of Western imperialism
@garyeuscher4499
@garyeuscher4499 3 ай бұрын
Don’t blame Chinese incompetence and backwardness on other countries. China is and has been corrupt, well before the white man arrived
@tty2020
@tty2020 Жыл бұрын
Wrong info in the video. There are 150 J20 in service. And it is a better stealth plane than F35.
@ace1gl
@ace1gl Жыл бұрын
So where do they put all the extra fuel to give it 2.5x the range of the f22.
@paulgibbons2320
@paulgibbons2320 Ай бұрын
Look at it's length. It's a much bigger frame.
@MrAero_1
@MrAero_1 Жыл бұрын
The J-20 just doesn't compare to them at all. China can boost up themselves all they want , just like Russia did and we all know how that turned out. The F-35 and F-22 are more than just a stealth body, the technology in them are decades ahead
@sneakymove
@sneakymove Жыл бұрын
Ya. Same like china space station, Beidou Navigation Satelite , 5G technology, 6G, high speed rail, hypersonic missiles....they are all decades away compare to US. Those are all fakes in China, and doesn't exist. Its just plain impossible chinese can invent those technologies. Those tech must be stolen from US. Eventho US might not have it yet, but yea, it Must be stolen from somewhere or someone in US. Only Anglo Saxon kind have that kind of brain. US is the most powerfulllll, just as US people are the smartesttttt of all ....like forever.....even no alien species can defeat US.... Are u happy to hear all that? U win. Hahahaha!
@pell9538
@pell9538 Жыл бұрын
The stealth and especially the sensors of the f35 specifically are the most advanced in the world no doubt about it but i wouldnt scoff at what china's done. They've leaped forward technologically at a very fast rate and left their father Russia in the dust, i wouldnt underestimate them.
@VittonLou
@VittonLou Жыл бұрын
Exactly, it's just all about the hype.
@gazzman6547
@gazzman6547 11 ай бұрын
@@pell9538 Ah yes. They've leaped forward technologically by stealing US technologies and still behind of F22's 30 years old tech. Very impressive china. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
@nobody-wk6ej
@nobody-wk6ej Жыл бұрын
It looks cool... But like the SU57, it screams paper tiger.
@stuartwiner7920
@stuartwiner7920 Жыл бұрын
This doesn't really tell anything that will make a difference. Stealth and avionics are closely-held secrets. I'm always curious why America made a smaller plane. They probably need a slightly bigger one for competitive range, so they wouldn't have to refuel so often and have that vulnerability. At some point they may super-size it, like they did with the super-hornet.
@DKLGalactus5
@DKLGalactus5 10 ай бұрын
Possibly better technology that's why the can make it smaller and more efficient.
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 9 ай бұрын
Smaller plane means smaller RCS...better stealth. The J-20 may have better range, but its bigger size means it will be spotted on radar long before the smaller F-22.
@r3yuk682
@r3yuk682 7 ай бұрын
thats not how it works@@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 7 ай бұрын
@@r3yuk682 That's exactly how RCS work, there are other factors but size plays a big role, if you cant mitigate it.
@r3yuk682
@r3yuk682 7 ай бұрын
the size of raptor and j 20 isnt that diff so the rcs not going to diff@@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@hu9818
@hu9818 25 күн бұрын
Took weeks for US to shoot a Chinese balloon. And we’re here comparing apple to apple?
@backstabingpike
@backstabingpike 2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 those engines are huge and leave a massive heat signature 😂😂😂
@hedgeearthridge6807
@hedgeearthridge6807 Жыл бұрын
The thing about the F-35 is we don't yet know the specifics of why it's so incredible, all that stuff is classified. But like Lazerpig said, the F-35 is like a gun, and all other planes are like crossbows. They're not even comparable. With modern missiles, it doesn't even need to be in the same country as the enemy. We can't actually make realistic comparisons
@jasonlee148
@jasonlee148 Жыл бұрын
Such a "badass" plane, still lost in Afghanistan against goat herders.
@vincentphan5097
@vincentphan5097 Жыл бұрын
@@jasonlee148 Exactly. I can see J-20 transforming into Optimus prime leading the Barbados 🇧🇧 to victory against Britain on foot
@netrubbish
@netrubbish Жыл бұрын
And the F35 has better stealth technology. It can dive into the ocean to hide in the botttom of the sea motionless and and stay silent
@MD97531
@MD97531 9 ай бұрын
@@jasonlee148you one of those clowns able to argue the US lost in Afghanistan but Russia is winning in Ukraine? 😂
@jsc3417
@jsc3417 7 ай бұрын
@@MD97531 how much land did the US gain in Afghistan over 20 years and how much land did Russia gain in Ukraine in less than one year?
@CtrlOptDel
@CtrlOptDel Жыл бұрын
After the US refused to sell F-22s to the UK it’ll be simultaneously hilarious & outrageous if the US tries to demand in a few years that we sell them Tempests to combat future Chinese aircraft… 🤨
@ItzD3fW1sH
@ItzD3fW1sH Жыл бұрын
Didn't know about tempest. Looks interesting!
@KTK-o
@KTK-o Жыл бұрын
They're working on their own 6th gen fighter so I don't see them asking UK for tempest. I don't even think USA has ever really bought any foreign fighters for use in their military really
@jej3451
@jej3451 Жыл бұрын
Were Harriers not considered fighters?
@KTK-o
@KTK-o Жыл бұрын
@@jej3451 ah forgot about that. However, I at the moment I don't see a reason USA would want to buy a foreign 5/6 gen fighter jets.
@CtrlOptDel
@CtrlOptDel Жыл бұрын
@@KTK-o Depends if they can actually get their 6th gen fighter working in time. They bought the Harrier (& replaced a few parts so they could claim it was a different, American, aircraft called the “McDonnell Douglas AV-8B”) because they couldn’t make a comparable aircraft of their own.
@skylem5373
@skylem5373 Жыл бұрын
But it all comes down to the Pilots that have the most flight time with there birds.
@thejeffinvade
@thejeffinvade Жыл бұрын
Chinese flighter pilots now fly 200-220 hours per year. That's more than the training you get in the US or UK.
@Invizable99
@Invizable99 Жыл бұрын
Irrelevant Gen 6 is in development , new missiles are the new war tech , turn into little drone stealth fighter swarms dropped from space.
@jamierawles5028
@jamierawles5028 Жыл бұрын
Chinas answer to the F22 Raptor tells you everything you need to know about them. They're contending with a plane that's some 20 years older. Always playing catch up.
@ex0duzz
@ex0duzz Жыл бұрын
Well duh. The point is china 70 years ago was poorer and more backwards than Africa. Now they have their own 5th gen planes, biggest economy by PPP, own aircraft carrier, own gps, own space station, landed on moon and mars, etc etc. China already leads USA in industries and technologies, like 5g, green tech, AI, high speed rail, quantum tech, etc.
@jasonlee148
@jasonlee148 Жыл бұрын
Your white house is scared of a country that always play catch up?
@nix123ism
@nix123ism Жыл бұрын
So what? The funny thing about the US war machine is , they go on and on about how they spend trillions of $ , have the most tech advanced military , the best trained and equiped soldiers when the reality is only in the results it delivers and looking at how many conflicts they have actually won since WW2 , 1 , Iraq, the rest have been withdrawals, stalemates or losses, their "advanced" military doesn't seem to produce any results that you would expect a military of that standing to produce, let alone protect the US from any attack, hell, the last time the US was attacked, 9/11 , 3 men entered the US legally, got trained up by US avaiation schools and flew 2 planes into the twin towers, how effective was the US military at protecting them from that attack?
@corneliuslove7952
@corneliuslove7952 Жыл бұрын
Yup and they still can't beat the F22
@ex0duzz
@ex0duzz Жыл бұрын
@@corneliuslove7952 wrong. They would destroy f22. That's why f22 is being retired and only f35 will be used. If they are so good and will Destroy j20, why retire them? J20 will have loyal wingman drones with dual seater versions, with missiles that outrange anything usa has. F22 cannot get inside china's anti access area denial range, any us forces which do will be destroyed like a joke, and any fight between china and usa will be in Taiwan or south china seas. It will never be 1on1 or "fair" fight, china holds all the cards fighting in it's backyard under it's rules. Usa will never have the balls to declare war on china again. Even during Vietnam war they didn't go into north Vietnam because china warned them not to even though they obliterated viet's in every fight and could have. This time they listened. After they underestimated china and learned their lesson the hard way in Korean war 70 years ago. They still remember that lesson today. No, usa will never attack or provoke china into direct war vs usa again. Usa cannot afford it. Both china and usa will go from 1st and 2nd to worse than Africa. Africa will be a paradise compared to usa after any war vs china. Usa is not THAT dumb to sacrifice themselves for what, Taiwan? Lol. They are using Taiwan for their benefit, not for their destruction.
@UngoyPrime
@UngoyPrime Жыл бұрын
With China’s highly competent cyber warfare and land acquisitions literally next to U.S installations internationally/domestically. It’s without a doubt the J-20 has U.S stealth technology.
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 9 ай бұрын
Lol no, the files they stole from Lockheed Martin were 256 bit encrypted, it would take a super computer 30 years to crack it, and its only been 10 years since they got the files
@darkevola7975
@darkevola7975 5 ай бұрын
bro, love how you online china b0ts try to show china as even a competent country, when it cant even win in air warfare against Taiwan.
@jb76489
@jb76489 3 ай бұрын
Source: I made it up
@MrOvertoad
@MrOvertoad 6 ай бұрын
Missle truck, handles about as good as a dualie.
@blaccdong7810
@blaccdong7810 2 күн бұрын
Its not the planes, its the pilots.
@cypeman8037
@cypeman8037 Жыл бұрын
Are the statistics on the Chinese jets verified or are they what the Chinese claim? And how much is postage delivered to my door? And don't try and force it through the letterbox.
@yuning8045
@yuning8045 Жыл бұрын
They are US/Russia/EU analyst claims, China didn't say a word about the j-20
@regolith1350
@regolith1350 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese J-20 runs circles around their western competition... in bad CGI.
@RB9522
@RB9522 2 ай бұрын
What are the MTBF MTTM numbers for the engines? LOL
@Minky-mv1pm
@Minky-mv1pm 3 ай бұрын
Well design!
@jake05sti
@jake05sti Жыл бұрын
I don’t believe any of the published capabilities. From either side for that matter. But I’d be willing to bet that the J20s are much more overstated than the F22
@bertjilk3456
@bertjilk3456 Жыл бұрын
Quick reminder: nine months ago, videos just like this one talked about how powerful Russia's military was, including their 4th & 5th gen fighters. That all turned out to be complete rubbish. More well-choreographed propaganda (that many believed) than actual reality. When push came to shove, Russia was/is rather pathetic. We don't know much about the J-20, but I don't think it's nearly as capable as many suggest. They do look the part, just like the much vaunted SU-57 (where has that been, BTW?). In short, not much to worry about, get on with your lives. 😅
@thomaszhang3101
@thomaszhang3101 Жыл бұрын
And Russian GDP is equivalent to that of a third rate Chinese province, while China is churning out more engineers per year than the total population of engineers in America.
@Nainara32
@Nainara32 Жыл бұрын
To paraphrase Warren Buffet, "It's only when the tide goes out that you learn if Chinese manufacturers have been swimming naked."
@lcplapiata5501
@lcplapiata5501 Жыл бұрын
When you believe in the ghost of Kyiv 😂🤣
@KTK-o
@KTK-o Жыл бұрын
@@thomaszhang3101 their posting out more scientific papers as well
@KTK-o
@KTK-o Жыл бұрын
Russian jets had outdated avionics. I mean they're the only 4++ gen fighters still using PESA radars. In theory China's jets seem to be more advanced
@hasanmustufa9667
@hasanmustufa9667 Жыл бұрын
Nonsense There is no comparison between J-20 and F-22, F-35 Usa fighter jets are well known while the only thing we know about j-20 is that its stealth nothing more than that
@ChipChat1493
@ChipChat1493 3 ай бұрын
Chinese J20 will use lasers instead of cannons. Hard to beat?
@_SamUSA_
@_SamUSA_ Жыл бұрын
It's not much of a secret after a few red bags were given to some designers. The US has nothing to worry about.
@tritium1998
@tritium1998 Жыл бұрын
It's not a few bags you need.
@_SamUSA_
@_SamUSA_ Жыл бұрын
@@tritium1998 Just a few Chinese designers is all that is needed. What matters is WHO gets the red bag. They are very easy to find, especially today. If you want to know who they are, look for the top Chinese engineers who have left China almost two years ago.
@Noobmaster-yc2pf
@Noobmaster-yc2pf Жыл бұрын
The J-20 looks like a cheap knockoff they tried to copy F-22 it might fall apart if it goes Mach 1.
@AlexWang990
@AlexWang990 3 ай бұрын
🤣
@bobsmith3983
@bobsmith3983 3 ай бұрын
You must be blind as both aircraft are quite different in execution. The F-22 is being retired soon so they are irrelevant.
@josef596
@josef596 Жыл бұрын
They copy and pasted it from a Satelite image. 😂
@ericliume
@ericliume Жыл бұрын
Number in service is not 74 but ~200
@yuhuagao4858
@yuhuagao4858 Жыл бұрын
最少300架。
@bigkaswrx8115
@bigkaswrx8115 Жыл бұрын
Just ordered mine off Ebay for £150 free Postage.
@teenytinytoons
@teenytinytoons Жыл бұрын
Insane how it looks exactly like the F-22 Raptor.
@loyalbeaver9402
@loyalbeaver9402 Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣Precisely! Just like how Biden looks exactly like Obama - even the skin color is the same.
@ericliume
@ericliume Жыл бұрын
Where are the canards on F22? Let alone the weapon bay design is totally different.
@darkevola7975
@darkevola7975 5 ай бұрын
@@ericliumelmao, even someone with absolutely no knowledge about arms or planes can see the similarity, No use of typing furiously to defend China when the whole world knows they can only replicate, not innovate. This is why "Chinese quality" means fake or unreliable in most nations.
@RSCB
@RSCB 4 ай бұрын
And better looking
@darkevola7975
@darkevola7975 4 ай бұрын
@@RSCB you need to wash your clouded eyes with bleach
@eyeofthetiger6002
@eyeofthetiger6002 4 күн бұрын
Why's this thing so massive compared to the F35?
@jkeelsnc
@jkeelsnc Ай бұрын
I am sure the J-20 should NOT be underestimated. However, those canards compromise stealth. It does not mean this isn't an excellent aircraft.
@factorydriver1050
@factorydriver1050 Жыл бұрын
Good job chinese. Smart people
@Peggyg13
@Peggyg13 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese makes no secret about their ability to copy and replicate stolen technology perfectly. They are so shameless about it and their confidence in showing off Ripped off design is just amazing.
@curryzhong3660
@curryzhong3660 Жыл бұрын
Bro what r u talking about😅there’s no patent when it comes to weapon and military😅 speaking of stealing tech u should question the states why they just took all the German engineers back after ww2
@Peggyg13
@Peggyg13 Жыл бұрын
@@curryzhong3660 so stealing is now a national security objective for the Chinese right ? To Steal every and any technology available. Your obvious pride in what the Chinese does is just baffling.
@famousraperandrapperkriswu656
@famousraperandrapperkriswu656 Жыл бұрын
sounds easy.. why no country make it? 😆😆🤡🤡
@curryzhong3660
@curryzhong3660 Жыл бұрын
@@Peggyg13 ur very funny, if stealing is easy, why dont u see a North Korean version of f22?? is the US that weak that even a developing country can easily "steal" its tech?
@curryzhong3660
@curryzhong3660 Жыл бұрын
@@Peggyg13 im sure most americans are still proud of NASA's legendary saturn v rocket, but its chief designer was Wernher von Braun who was German lmfao, are u refering that ur national pride is established by stealing other nation's tech?
@jlds1949
@jlds1949 Жыл бұрын
actually J20 have 250 unit in service in today
@Deetroiter
@Deetroiter Жыл бұрын
Lol looks like it was made in the same factory where Tupperware is made
American F-35s encounter Chinese J-20s over the Pacific
19:36
Sandboxx
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
Top 10 Best Fighter Jets in the World 2024
12:25
Military TV
Рет қаралды 959 М.
Спаси её волосы🙏🏻
00:40
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
КИРПИЧ ОБ ГОЛОВУ #shorts
00:24
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
McDonald’s MCNUGGET PURSE?! #shorts
00:11
Lauren Godwin
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
How The World's Most Powerful Fighter Jet Engine Is Made
17:12
Sam Eckholm
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Why the Chinese Stealth J-20 might be not what you think
10:35
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the F-35B
25:04
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
KF-21: Korea's New Fighter
15:43
Australian Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 703 М.
Why China Thinks Its J-20 is Better than the F-35 or F-22
10:04
US Military News
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
The World’s Most Advanced Fighter Jet | F-35 Lightning
15:29
Sam Eckholm
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Спаси её волосы🙏🏻
00:40
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН