Judge Teaches Tearful Defendant Life Lesson! & Odd Request!

Subscribe to help the channel, please.
In this court hearing Judge Teaches Tearful Defendant Life Lesson! & Odd Request!
Every defendant is innocent until proven guilty. These videos are designed to provide a glimpse into US justice system. CourtCamTV's goal is to educate and entertain people.
This isn't official court record. Check official courts' transcripts and channels to learn more.
SOVEREIGN CITIZEN In Court
Karen In Court
lauren lake's paternity court
people's court
judge judy full episodes
off the court sleazy
divorce court judge lynn toler
cancel court
personal injury court
#women #crazy #sovereign citizen #sovcit #trending #bikes #karen #mothers #cars

[@steppy3736]

You lost your son because you didn't do what you were supposed to do; these are called consequences." Wow! Wtg Judge!

[@jenniferbangerter5128]

She is Judge and she is so firm fair and wise

[@debbieellett9093]

Why in the world would a dude who is using drugs be carrying loaded guns?? And I am with the Judge, drug addicts and loaded guns are not a smart idea.

[@artgroupie]

“What!? Why are you crying?” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 “Because I lost my son 😢😢” “….you lost your son because you didn’t do what you were suppose to do. These are called consequences.” I love it 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@veraoldham8983]

"Alright. Here's what we're gonna do....." I love Judge Boyd.

[@pwest2986]

Indeed, she is concerned with the lives of victims of family violence , what a noble gesture and common sense.

[@actuallowroller]

I feel all the middle schools and high-schools should watch these cases. These judges really drop some wonderful knowledge and advice and seeing these people dealing with the consequences of their bad choices might make a person do something differently. Great video.

[@Siamesebutter]

Perhaps parents should watch this too as it should be their responsibility to teach their children Right from Wrong.

[@asabovesobelow7981]

​@@Siamesebutter🎯👌

[@SannTenny]

This Judge is just amazing! We need more judges like her!

[@destroyerinazuma96]

Those bags in the background are becoming a trademark of hers.

[@Claudia-lq3ns]

And the flowers, too 💐

[@trubblesiriahrenn751]

We enjoy your professionalism. your knowledge, your strength. One of the best Judges we have both seen. Ever... Now on a personal level.... Your collection of Handbags is a big Wow!!!! I watch each time to see what's new..... Imagining the matching shoes... 😍

[@OHlookSHINYthing]

This judge must have a room in her house just for her purses. Seems she has a different one in each of these videos. LOL

[@A5hleigh]

Yup. Started noticing that too. You go, judge Boyd!

[@DeeDeeUnlimited]

I was thinking the same exact thing 😂

[@ronwade2206]

Now I have to go back and watch again. 😅

[@ericcoverdale9523]

I love her, she always has them prominently displayed! 💗

[@OHlookSHINYthing]

@@ericcoverdale9523 and I have loved every one of them. I love purses, so it's always a treat to see which one she has on display. 🙂

[@stefanboster5728]

Faced with profound failure, I might be doing some crying, too.. Brutal..

[@dottyebenton5352]

I love, love Judge Boyd. She is a no no nonsense judge but tries her best to help these people, to no avail. All of our judges should be just like her. ❤

[@Kennymac8251]

Judge Bryant, tough as nails but also compassionate when needed. Excellent judge.

[@sjc4]

Judge Boyd. Stephanie Boyd.

[@Kennymac8251]

I keep mixing the two up, Michigan Bryant and Texas Boyd. @@sjc4

[@dgatsf]

Judge Boyd is fierce.

[@slc1161]

One female judge has glasses coordinated with every outfit. Judge Boyd has purses. Love both their style and the way they adjudicate their cases.

[@mzuribeauty4287]

She has millions of purses😂

[@butyoucancallmesam]

Who's the judge with different glasses?

[@natsumikenshiru]

love her so much best judge😍😍

[@michaelbeattie8106]

She rocks.

[@steppy3736]

I love that she's bluntly honest.

[@ericcoverdale9523]

I could watch her and Judge Lynise Bryant ALL DAY long!!

[@sylviabenson6523]

This judge is great. What I don't understand is 12k views and only 544 likes? Come on guys.

[@emithen]

“These are called consequences.” BOOM!

[@cdrone4066]

Boy she’s a tough judge.

[@michaelbeattie8106]

What the world needs.

[@Monica92978]

Damn straight. She’s a Judge in the county where I live. I wish all the Judges were like her.

[@cmonster6]

Keep serial number on a list and photos as well.mine were stolen and I was able to give the detectives a list of serial numbers which helped in the investigation and proof they were mine when the weapons were actually recovered

[@tomwagner2773]

is it me? Or are the ADA and PD seem totally disinterested and disorganized. ?

[@TheScream2023]

Loving todays bag !!!

[@JustMe-pu3xm]

The judge is fanning herself like she is in Church 🤣🤣🤣

[@sharone.langley2923]

probably a personal summer

[@samuelbradley8062]

Menopause. That thang hot and steamy

[@janicelyle6966]

The court’s air conditioning system is not working. Judge Boyd has mentioned it before.

[@JustMe-pu3xm]

@@janicelyle6966 ohhh,, I didn’t hear that part..Thanks

[@angelminaj617]

Its not odd that he want his property back. He purchased them.

[@jgbains]

Would you give a grenade back to a felon

[@angelminaj617]

@@jgbains Not the same. Have a brain and don't act slow.

[@ericcoverdale9523]

​@@jgbainsExactly! 💯

[@72stones43]

Give the druggies their guns?

[@evesther1789]

I felt for the first guy I love judge Boyd she’s fair but tough gave him tough love but was fair to him I hope and pray he gets life turn around for the better he seems like a good person just made a lot of mistakes I say this cause I have and I have kids were not perfect as parents but we gotta try and make it better if we do make these mistakes so wishing him good luck 😊❤

[@pwest2986]

Indeed, so he can protect himself while he engage in illegal drug activity

[@ma32851]

I love this judge.

[@asabovesobelow7981]

DITTO 💛

[@pwest2986]

It appears that she is concerned about protecting domestic violence victims and not allowing drug dealers to carry firearms ., will he be able to produce a legitimate bill of sale?

[@monicadonnelly4991]

Now that his son is out of the picture he can party at will

[@Grawlix_Jungle]

There’s pictures of the first guy with his no-contact victim together on Facebook from 2018. Good luck to them I guess

[@alisonargall9763]

What the…. They were going to send this guy to prison for 2 years over a 3 year old failed drug screen. And he had already completed probation. Just because he owed some fines..? That is bonkers. Good on the judge for not granting that wacky shit. Gee that’s burden our prison system some more with someone who completed 5 years of probation with only one slip up. The state would’ve had to pay to house and feed him for two years …. All the while those fines are still not being paid off. Literally mind blowing to me.

[@mikejones7708]

He didn't lose his son he threw him away. People can choose to not even try drugs, end of story.

[@firefly-fu3ce]

Oh hes crying now 🙄🙄

[@scottmccrea1873]

So one is on probation and deferred adjudication at the same time. And probation can end before the deferred adjudication. I thought it was one or the other. Learned something to day.

[@moderator7169]

they said suspend the probation and enter deferred

[@scottmccrea1873]

@@moderator7169 Sometimes she says "probated sentence" too. Lawyers use words in peculiar ways. sometimes not at all like normal speech. And they'll usually explain it if you ask them. Its way too complex and confusing for outsiders. People who think they can represent themselves are dumb.

[@Codyjrt]

Brandon needs to see this judge.

[@mydogsioux]

Not sure who you're referring to but Trump definitely needs to see her!

[@taylorprather3106]

@@mydogsiouxshe voted for trump hun. She’s from a red state

[@Amy-cs8yh]

@@taylorprather3106 you do realize that the terms red state and blue state means majority of the population leans a certain way. Not 100%, right? For example, in Texas approximately 40-65% of the voting population typically leans Republican and approximately 30-45% of the voting population typically leans Democrat. The exact percentages can vary election to election.

[@alexcentury2166]

She's an elected official. She was elected to the judge position as a Democrat in 2018 and re-elected in 2022. You can look it up.

[@RolandBullock-ej8wl]

10 years, he must have been kicking his families' butt as a youth ! Stop crying....you weren't crying when you were wile'in out on your family!

[@pwest2986]

So is the DA anti guns also?

[@knowyourrights9793]

This is Truly Disgusting, The fact that 1 Dirty UA can send you to prison for 2-10 YEARS BUT *Violate* a *Protection Order* & you will Get your *GUNS BACK!*

[@GTPLewellen]

What are you talking about??

[@monicadonnelly4991]

And he drinks and does coke

[@tejeda7324]

@@monicadonnelly4991 unfortunately, my friend, the constitution does not say the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed unless you do Coke and drink

[@christina5kids16grands]

What is the ruling at 8:54? "Terminate you on SAT.." - what did that mean please? Was he let off?

[@mmcla5]

I believe that means she terminated his probation satisfactorily. So yes, he was let off instead of serving the 2 to 5 years. Judge Boyd can be tough, but she is fair.

[@pwest2986]

How did you draw that conclusion? You should not make such assumptions without merit. She is merely looking out for victims of domestic violence and unarming the drug dealer. Odd that he is not requesting his ammunition to be returned.

[@susanhuntley9262]

Cant hear most

[@YNot19152Xs]

Why Wouldn’t he want his weapon back? He’d be lacking to give it up, he can’t do anything about the Other charge until it goes to court. Why wouldn’t he get back what he can, while he can.

[@moderator7169]

what the hell did you watch???? because the whole hearing was for him to get his weapons back. he requested his weapons back and this is the hearing. where did you hear he doesn't want his weapon back???? the only thing they werent asking for is the ammunition good God people really don't pay attention at all

[@tmalfieri1]

Weapons (guns/rifles/shotguns) can be quite expensive. I see nothing wrong with the guy asking for them to be returned if he has a legal right to do so. 😊

[@SteveOnTheEastCoast]

I agree. This was the 1st case where I think her feelings erred against case law and property rights.

[@mrsangelafisher]

I also agree. I didn't think it was strange that he wanted them back.

[@patriciarangel9915]

I think MTG would be happy to have this criminal get the weapons back.😒😒😒😒😒

[@mattroy7326]

Judge looks like she has a couol2 of black eyes.

[@doilysimpkin6972]

I love this judge a lot, but i don't think it's professional for any judge to say in open court that they disagree with any law they are there to uphold. Of course, everyone is entitled to hold their own beliefs, including judges, and they don't have to agree with all of the laws they uphold, but i think it is unprofessional to air those beliefs in the course of their duties, whether they agree or disagree.

[@framazz7575]

Well, the same Supreme Court rules with some judges on dissent. It's their job to INTERPRET the law, their opinion is fundamental for legality to become justice.

[@doilysimpkin6972]

@@framazz7575 Sure. She read out the law, which was pretty clear in this instance, and ruled accordingly. There was no need to then effectively air her grievances with the ruling she made.

[@nightrat42]

​@doilysimpkin6972 some laws are dumb, and some people don't appreciate the chances they're given. Perfectly acceptable for her to state her opinion as long as it's done respectfully.

[@SteveOnTheEastCoast]

​@nightrat42 your feelings shouldn't go against case law. That puts her judiciary objectivity in question.

[@SteveOnTheEastCoast]

​@@framazz7575this is not the Supreme Court, which you already know.

[@robertwadas]

He should not be seperated from his children and have the same standards as people entering the United States Illegally.

[@wandachapman2403]

They’re his guns give them back, it’s none of your business

[@scottmccrea1873]

I am disappointed that Judge Boyd appears to be anti-2A. That's unfortunate. What _is_ fortunate is that she follows the law rather than her own ideological preferences.

[@sandboxplayerz667]

She's not anti 2nd. I'm sorry she doesn't think a guy charged for drug trafficking should have guns. In many states, that's the law. They can't have weapons. Even in Texas, you aren't allowed to have guns over DV cases, which are often far less serious in my view because it's he said and she said thing.

[@scottmccrea1873]

@@sandboxplayerz667 I beg to differ. This isn't the first time I've seen her make anti-gun remarks. "No one needs to own a weapon like this." That's classic gun grabbing bullshit. don't get me wrong, I like this judge. But she's a Democrat in a heavily Democratic county. It would be very odd indeed if a true 2A proponent were elected there. She's clearly anti-gun. Doesn't make her a bad person, it just makes her completely wrong. But she does follow the law. If all leftist judges did so, the country would be in much better shape.

[@sandboxplayerz667]

@@scottmccrea1873 I didn't see that video. I can only talk about the one I'm watching. Do you agree most domestic violence cases are less serious than drug traffic charges? In one case, your weapons are taken away. Judge showing concern over him wanting his guns right away is normal, nothing to do with 2nd. I'm sure the request is very rare as the defendants are more focused on fighting charges. It was so rare that even the State's lawyer didn't know, and they needed to dig into the laws.

[@scottmccrea1873]

@sandboxplayerz667 federal law says that misdemeanor DV conviction means loss of 2A rights. I think that's wrong as a general prohibition but might be right in specific cases. If he completed his deterred Adjudication then he's no longer prohibited from owning firearms. So her discomfort seems more than he shouldn't have them at all. As I said, it's not just this video. I've seen 2 others where she made antigun remarks. Look as long as she doesn't abuse her power to violate 2A rights, her personal opinions aren't relevant. But it's pretty clear what her opinion is.

[@sandboxplayerz667]

@@scottmccrea1873 Fair enough. I haven't seen other videos.

[@doltbezoar]

Texas. Giving guns back to all violent offenders and drug addicts. What can go wrong?

[@fappydabear1774]

I really like this judge, but I disagree with her gun takes.

[@cargopilotguy305]

He wants the weapons back because the constitution says he’s entitled to them. You don’t get to decide whether or not he has a 2A, judge.

[@pwest2986]

He is also entitled to traffic drugs with gun too?

[@cargopilotguy305]

@@pwest2986 don’t change the discussion. In this court room, in this case, he was entitled to his constitutional rights. Period.

[@KyleInOklahoma]

😂Texas needs to get it's act together & elect those who won't put activists on the bench. It's her job to call the balls & strikes, not to do her best to find a way to keep his property. He has as much of a right to have those guns as her honor does because neither of them are felons. I love how she can do nothing about it. Here in Oklahoma, we have 99% of those on the bench & the ppl of course who are all for this 2A sanctuary which is in response to sanctuary states for criminals, those on the run. So they want to protect these criminals in Cali, MA, etc then we should be allowed protect ourselves with no restrictions besides the obvious. (felons, etc)

[@robertwadas]

The law states the weapons must be returned to the person from who they were confiscated from. Nowhere does it say that he has to prove ownership. Maybe he want the guns back to sell to pay for his legal fees. The reason he put this case request because he had a strickt timeline to do it, 61 days. Shows the illogical thinking of the Judge. She does not think he should get his legal property back... Who cares what the Judge thinks, apply the law without unnecessary yapping about your personal opinion. Stick to your Job.

[@CalifornianSupremacy]

She LITERALLY read the statute out loud which specified ownership proof. What the hell are you talking about?

[@robertwadas]

@@CalifornianSupremacy Listen again.. proof must be shown only if they were alleged to be stolen. There was no such allegation

[@Oi....]

Sorry Mate, the Crying only works with women.... Men gotta Man up.

[@carolesmith4864]

Gotta give him back his guns. Luckily there is law that supersedes a judge's feelings. I say that even while enjoying watching the cases brought before this judge.

[@jillionairess]

unless the judge specifically says so. that's how I read it. unless it's changed since 2022 which is highly possible.

[@makeapathpresents]

That's what you call an activist judge, ruling with emotions outside of law. I don't give a shit if she doesn't understand why he wants his property. It's his property. I am glad she's gonna stick to the law tho and I agree, serious protection orders with high risk shouldn't have weapons during that period. Unfortunately there's a ton of really stupid TPOs.

[@Collageartist69]

She always follows the law.

[@Claudia-lq3ns]

Wait. How did she show bias? She said she didn't want to give back the weapons because his drug trafficking offense. That makes sense to me, and I own weapons and strongly support the 2nd amendment. Just because she doesn't want to give someone who is convicted of drug trafficking their guns back doesn't make her opposed to the 2nd amendment. What am I missing here?

[@carolesmith4864]

@@Claudia-lq3ns She wanted to find a way to keep them from him, because of her feelings, even while acknowledging that by law she must give them back. Making him produce proof they are his is one way she could make it hard for him to get them back. I have guns with no proof they are mine other than my say so, no receipts or anything. One I bought from a police officer while I was in college, no receipt there.

[@rmhanseniii]

That’s the worst wig I’ve ever seen

[@v.a.993]

Leave Steven and his wig alone. There are more and bigger things to worry about in life than what someone's wig looks like.

[@rmhanseniii]

@@v.a.993 she’s a total slob, drinking big gulps and purposely embarrassing the accused, it’s no way to behave.

[@Collageartist69]

It's not a wig.

[@rmhanseniii]

@@Collageartist69 she is a total slob… disrespectful to the court and the accused

[@Gravital115]

I like this Judge most of the time, and she was fair, but her opining on guns was annoying and unnecessary. We get it. You don’t like guns. No one needs to hear it, and the law is crystal clear. You are there to follow precedent and uphold the law. She reveals a bias against the defendant by all but telling him that he is in the wrong for wanting his property back and exercising his constitutional rights. Also, she is clearly salivating at the idea of Prosecution digging up any scrap of case law she can twist to deny the defendant of his lawful possessions. Frustrating to say the least, but at least she ended at the right decision. (Also her simply shrugging at the $$ value of these weapons in the couple of thousands like it’s nothing is again annoying to say the VERY minimum.)

[@sandboxplayerz667]

That's not her problem. He's facing drug traffic charges, and he's worried about getting his guns back. It's you who are being extra precious about it. This isn't a constitution issue as in other states you can take away their guns in these circumstances. If something bad happens, people like you'll be crying why was a trafficker given guns.

[@Gravital115]

@@sandboxplayerz667 yes it is her problem to be unbiased. That is her only problem actually. To be an unbiased defender of the law she took an oath to uphold. If she can’t separate her own personal views from what the law dictates and the rights he and everyone else is entitled to then that’s a serious problem. Yes, he’s worried about getting his personal property back which he is absolutely entitled to under the constitution. I would imagine most people including yourself don’t enjoy confiscation. I’m Not sure what other states you are referring to where you can be stripped of your ownership rights without being convicted of a crime, but you may be right I frankly don’t know. If what you say is true that sounds like an unconstitutional law. You should be convicted before losing any rights or liberties guns or not in my precious view. As to how I would feel about something happening to me personally, that’s anecdotal, but yes of course I would be upset if I were wronged. Fortunately or unfortunately these are the rights we are all afforded.

[@sandboxplayerz667]

@@Gravital115 If charges are pending, your guns can be taken away in other states. I'm sure you're court hearings watcher. In Michigan, if you are out on bond, every judge tells the defendant isn't allowed to own or have a weapon. Even in Texas, if it's a family violence case, you aren't allowed to have a weapon. You hear countless times Judge Boyd say that while talking to a defendant. This has nothing to do with constitution. So, let's get that straight. Even in this video, Judge says Texas might pass a bill where you can't take away guns for DV anymore. She did put bias aside and ruled according to the law.

[@Claudia-lq3ns]

​@@sandboxplayerz667I agree with you. When you are on probation/parole/sentenced (especially for drug trafficking and violence), people lose their rights to have weapons and firearms.

[@Gravital115]

@@sandboxplayerz667 Yes, she did put her bias aside and ruled correctly. I acknowledge that in the original comment. My issue was her inability to keep her bias to herself. In this particular case he was entitled to his guns. Even if it’s not a constitutional issue, disagree to disagree on that point I suppose, her inability to keep her bias to herself is a problem and speaks to a difficulty of separating her personal views from the case and remain impartial. Again, yes she made the right decision and I’m thankful for that, but not before letting everyone know she’s not happy about doing her job and giving the defendant back his legal property that he is perfectly entitled to.

[@Moleinhole]

He did not lose his son!!! More then likely save his son!!!! Drugs are bad don’t do them !!!! Hopefully the Mother is doing the right things!!!🤔

[@alfmerck6262]

The judge could play Velma in a live action remake of the abysmal animated show.....