Karen Read Jurors Speaking Out to Confirm Not Guilty Verdict

[@CourtTV]

00:00 Opening Statements with Julie Grant 02:43 Karen Read Jurors Speak Out 16:24 Sonya Massey Shooting Update 21:10 Hotel Workers Charged with Murder 26:20 Brendan Depa Sentencing 36:06 Karen Read Back in Court Friday #CourtTV What do YOU think? Catch up on MA v. #KarenRead here: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?

[@my2cents581]

Why is the reporter talking like that? The run-on questions are as WEIRD as her CADENCE! Please just talk NORMAL so we can understand.

[@mattthompson9160]

The judges behavior towards Karen and the defense attorneys was ridiculous. Her sighing all the time was uncalled for too. She had it in for Karen and team the entire trial. She should not be involved in anymore of Karen's court proceedings.

[@mattthompson9160]

@SunsetBlue-r2eAre you serious right now? You never heard the judge sigh????? 🤣😂😆 Then you were watching a total different trial or you had the tv muted,, because literally people were commenting and complaining about it every day! You're the one who needs medication or HEARING AIDS

[@mattthompson9160]

@SunsetBlue-r2e You were watching a different trial then or had the tv muted. You need some hearing aids or a better tv

[@earlsmypearl5949]

@SunsetBlue-r2ewhoahhhh are you serious or trying to start a rage over your comment. Did you watch the trial? This is scary . People can not be this stupid. Something has to be done to fix stupid. I’m concerned

[@vickirobinette1452]

I’m concerned about all of you people who can’t hear. I listened Every day. There’s absolute nothing wrong with my hearing. The judge was sighing non stop throughout the trial.

[@TeresiaLemaster]

Either sighing or bad case of asthma😅​@@vickirobinette1452

[@Headcase650]

When there are multiple charges on a verdict form it should be absolutely mandatory to pole the jury foreman on each charge before declaring a mistrial. The fact that it's not legally required is a huge hole in our judicial system.

[@vikkyvictoriaf2395]

They had verdict forms for each charge.

[@cambodiateacher]

Don't soft pedal Proctor by stating he has been moved to another dept when he has been suspended without pay. Plus other LEO's on this case are under investigation

[@dargful]

The judge caused this confusion.

[@KarenPeck54]

To me, the directions sounded like the jury needed a unanimous decision on "all" counts before marking the jury paperwork.

[@JRay.R]

That’s exactly right.

[@GrandmaMarlayne]

This Judge was horrible in the Karen Read trial. She did not do justice for this trial. If they do have a trial then I would say they also need to start over with a NEW investigation of the case by top investigators to look into the family that held the after-party and where the victim died. Investigators that can look without any bias but just wanting truth.

[@bexyrexy]

A proper investigation is impossible at this point. The crime scene was contaminated. The Albert’s house was never searched. Phone data was destroyed before it could have been collected. John’s arm wounds weren’t swabbed. That’s why it should be dismissed.

[@ballen787]

Shocked that 9 jurors voted guilty on ANY charge. Worst case I’ve seen in recent memory. Weird stuff going on in Mass. Edit: And Massey was murdered in cold blood. Cop is done. Life without parole; do we really even need a trial when the entire encounter is on camera?!

[@Seabees_SW2]

The jurors are not law professionals, the judge is and it is up to the judge to have a clear historical record for this proceeding. Period.

[@kabbystevens5167]

The judge acted as if this was the first time she had a jury.

[@cfawcett9870]

​@SunsetBlue-r2ewell you're half right, the jury listens to the evidence and comes to a verdict according to the law

[@Seabees_SW2]

@SunsetBlue-r2e which they were bamboozled at every turn, lies by the prosecution allowed in, defense experts not allowed to give full testimony, completely conflicting and confusing jury instructions and rushed out the door. Smh sure it was all above board, hopefully it's not you this happens to next time. I'm sure you would want a fair trial. But since it is someone else, it's okay? Open your eyes.

[@bethbounds2873]

FREE Karen Read‼️

[@MegaTazmom]

@@bethbounds2873 she’s guilty

[@MsFitz11]

If you have not noticed Karen Read is FREE. It is sad how the loss of John O’Keefe has become unimportant in this circus.

[@Kristina_617]

She's not "FREE." She's out on bail. Justice for Karen Read IS justice for John O'Keefe. 🩷💙 You can tell who watched the trial and who watched clips. How anyone can listen to the testimony of the ARCCA experts from the FBI vs Trooper Paul and not scientifically understand she's innocent is beyond me. Even the prosecution's medical examiner said the injuries were inconsistent with a MVA. As did the FBI ARCCA experts who were independent of each side. They said the car didn't hit him and he wasn't hit by the car. If they want to retry on count 2, fine. Counts 1 & 3 should be dropped.

[@jendee1260]

@@MegaTazmomplease

[@shaylynned8786]

@SunsetBlue-r2e They obviously didnt wait for the trial to be over..

[@Trial-watcher2023]

The judge failed also, you can hear she is bias

[@carrow1057]

Agree, the jurors were articulate. They had the golden opportunity to clarify their thoughts.

[@shaylynned8786]

Im hoping we can hear what the bullying was about, so many ways to hear from these Juror's if they dont want to be seen, I just hope know favors were done for certain people, wonder if the Feds will investigate that?

[@SJSummers01]

@@shaylynned8786Feds have investigators of Read case ‘Under Investigations’, but seems to be on vacation to allow a 2nd trial or continuation of this madness IS INCOMPETENCE!!!! Jurors are afraid of harassment. The Cops (in costume) that beat John to death terrorize people who don’t sing their songs & dance their dances. 68 witnesses PERJURED themselves FOR the Prosecution (showing their ‘loyalty’ to their corrupt regime) - & allowed murderers of a good man & OFFICER (notice they never reference that?) to go free & frame his girlfriend. Four of them have made my life hell. I can’t comprehend what the Feds are waiting for….they perjured themselves Under Pains & Penalties of Perjury!! Judge mislead Jury on instruction & confused them; didn’t follow procedure to declare mistrial, premature. She considers the Albert’s her 2nd family. They spend time at her Cape home…’Aunt Bev’.

[@Ji5-24]

@@SJSummers01 1. During KR’s arraignment hearing at the Stoughton District Court on 2 February 2022 (whereby KR was aged 41, as a (supposed) intelligent, assertive and forthright person, and having legal representation) the following occurred and was confirmed. 2. Yannetti gave submissions for quite some time and represented to the Court that KR lacked any criminal intent in what was referred to as a “motor vehicle accident”. 3. KR had told LE at the time: (a). She dropped JO off because she was having stomach issues (this contradicts her subsequent calls and voice mails and what she told JO’s niece that they had an argument, that night). (b). She made a three point turn in the road and left (this is an admittance of reversing her SUV in Fairview Road as was verified at the trial). (c). She did not see JO enter, or go to, the Alberts house (as verified via the trial along with JO’s GPS and Apple data showing he did not go to the house and did not move from where he was found). (d). She first observed her broken taillight that morning and did not know how she broke it (this contradicts the later story that it was broken due to her hitting JO’s SUV with her SUV). (e). She said at the time of finding JO: “I hit him” three times (no one made this up later as some people are alleging). (f). There was no mention of any police cover up or anything of that nature, or that anyone was involved in JO’s passing, or that KR didn’t know what happened to JO, or that she had nothing to do with his passing. 4. Yannetti told reporters outside of court: (a). “KR was in shock”. (b). “JO’s death had been an innocent accident”. (c). “KR had no criminal intent”. (d). “KR loved this man and was devastated”. 5. Via a later interview KR’s father advised she had said to him at the time: (a). “Dad I think I struck something”. (b). “I remember backing up and hitting something” (again verifying KR reversing her SUV as verified at the trial, along with some sort of accident occurring at that exact time, and via her SUV data). (c). KR was obviously not referring to hitting JO’s vehicle as she would not have used the word “something”. 6. KR’s words that night via voicemails: “John I f***ing hate you”, “John I’m here with your f***ing kids”, “You are a f***ing pervert”, “I’m with your f***ing niece and nephew”, “You’re a f***ing loser” and “F**** yourself”. The venom in her voice and obsession in the fifty three (53) calls she made to him, and also the texts she sent earlier that day, appear to indicate instability/rage/anger. 7. KR later stated (via an interview): “What I thought could have happened was that did I incapacitate him unwittingly, somehow, and then in his drunkenness, he passed out”. 8. The above statement of KR is so close to what the CW are stating happened and the evidence in the trial (except the CW believe she hit JO intentionally) and if the defense current Motion is true - the jurors also believed she hit JO (eg. Juror quote: “none of us believed she hit him on purpose”). 9. KR’s own words via the above statement also lines up with what she said at the time, that she didn’t see JO go to the house (which his GPS and Apple data also proves he didn’t). 10. Eg. How could she even think that she could have incapacitated JO etc, if she saw him go to the house - it would be impossible and why would any person generally even think such a thing. 11. It appears that what KR said at the time is true (usually generally would be the case) and at her arraignment, etc, what she has said since is untrue. 12. The above is all publicly out there for people to watch for themselves and can’t be denied.

[@Empresstya]

Judge Cannone clearly stated in her instructions they couldn't talk to anyone including her, until theyd reached consensus on ALL charges. Judge should have asked if this was the case in each charge

[@MarkG-h2y]

For those who blame the Karen Read jury for not clarifying their position on the charges in their notes to the judge, the defense had time to talk to the judge after the hung jury announcement since the judge said she would be speaking privately with the jury. But they chose not.

[@missyward1512]

I’m sorry but she didn’t do this! So much corruption it’s disgusting.

[@Ji5-24]

Where are you going with all this, are you going to take over KR’s defense. Oh wait …. did you not get the memo that the FBI already investigated the frame job and the conspiracy theory (even calling on a Federal Grand Jury) and finalised it via a 3,700 page report and found no evidence of such and no charges/indictments were laid against anyone - charges still only against KR. Evidence not there then - it’s not there now - it never will be. Otherwise, surely you are not alleging that the FBI and the FGJ are also “IN ON IT”. Have you reported your concerns and thoughts as a person who thinks they know more than the FBI and without; the case files, the appropriate and necessary training, expertise and access to their high level software, etc, to the FBI’s superior governing body, to see if there is anyone there who cares 🤔. Otherwise, a waste of YT space and people’s time reading comments about matters that have already been investigated by the FBI.

[@ldolan4051]

The instructions were convoluted.

[@Ji5-24]

1. During KR’s arraignment hearing at the Stoughton District Court on 2 February 2022 (whereby she was aged 41, as a (supposed) intelligent, assertive and forthright person, and having legal representation) the following occurred and was confirmed. 2. Yannetti gave submissions for quite some time and represented to the Court that KR lacked any criminal intent in what was referred to as a “motor vehicle accident”. 3. It was confirmed KR had told LE at the time: (a). She dropped JO off because she was having stomach issues (this contradicts her subsequent calls, voice mails and what she told JO’s niece that they had an argument, that night). (b). She made a three point turn in the road and left (this is an admittance of reversing her SUV in Fairview Road as was verified at the trial). (c). She did not see JO enter, or go to, the Alberts house (as verified via the trial along with JO’s GPS and Apple data showing that he did not move from where he was found after getting out of KR’s SUV). (d). She first observed her broken taillight that morning and did not know how she broke it (this contradicts the later story that it was broken due to her hitting JO’s SUV with her SUV). (e). She said at the time of finding JO: “I hit him” three times (verifying the people attesting to this via the trial were truthful). (f). There was no mention of any police cover up or anything of that nature, or that anyone was involved in JO’s passing, or that KR didn’t know what happened to JO, or that she had nothing to do with it. 4. Yannetti told reporters outside of court: (a). “KR was in shock”. (b). “JO’s death had been an innocent accident”. (c). “KR had no criminal intent”. (d). “KR loved this man and was devastated”. 5. KR’s father advised (via an interview) she had said to him at the time: (a). “Dad I think I struck something”. (b). “I remember backing up and hitting something” (again verifying KR reversed her SUV, along with an accident occurring at that exact time, via her SUV data during the trial). (c). KR was obviously not referring to hitting JO’s vehicle as she would not have used the word “something”. 6. KR’s words that night via voicemails: “John I f***ing hate you”, “John I’m here with your f***ing kids”, “You are a f***ing pervert”, “I’m with your f***ing niece and nephew”, “You’re a f***ing loser” and “F**** yourself”. The venom in her voice and obsession in the fifty three (53) calls she made to JO and also the texts she sent to him earlier that day, appear to indicate instability/rage/anger. 7. KR later stated (via an interview): “What I thought could have happened was that did I incapacitate him unwittingly, somehow, and then in his drunkenness, he passed out”. 8. The above statement of KR aligns with what the CW are stating happened and the evidence in the trial (except the CW believe she hit JO intentionally) and if the defense current Motion is true - the jurors also believed KR hit JO (eg. Juror quote: “none of us believed she hit him on purpose”). 9. KR’s own words via the above statement also lines up with what she said at the time, including, that she didn’t see JO go to the house (which his GPS and Apple data proves he didn’t). 10. Posing the question - why would KR even think that she could have incapacitated JO, etc, if she saw him go to the house as that would be impossible and why would any person generally even think such a thing. 11. It appears what KR said at the time and what was said at her arraignment is true, and what she has said since is untrue. 12. The above is publicly out there for people to view for themselves and can’t be denied.

[@Ji5-24]

@@stolli48 The jury believed KR hit JO - juror quote: “none of us thought she hit him on purpose”. And Dr. Kenneth Kinsey (renown expert from the Alex Murdaugh trial) has stated publicly the injuries to JO's arm were not caused by a dog but from a vehicle. The FBI investigated the alleged "frame job" and "conspiracy theory" (and calling on a Federal Grand Jury) and found no evidence and no indictments/charges were laid. KR and the defense know this .... or are they alleging the FBI and the FGJ are also "IN ON IT". And who to blame next “Oscar the Grouch" hiding in a trash can on the road - oh wait I know….Frosty the Snowman 🤣

[@stolli48]

@@Ji5-24 Bin sehr froh ,dass ich in Deutschland lebe und nicht in so einem furchtbaren Land 🇩🇪🙏🇩🇪

[@anagr3010]

@@Ji5-24 Julie Grant clearly said (quoting the juror) even IF she hit JO, none of us "believe it was on purpose." They are not convinced that she hit him.

[@rando42069]

About Brendan Depa - if he is that dangerous at school, at home, at treatment, in public to society at large, what else is his possible trajectory other than prison if no one is able to help him change his behavior? Hopefully there's a state psychiatric hospital somewhere in the area with a forensic unit.

[@trialjunkie]

I seen the school security footage of the attack. He tried to kill that woman. People had to pull him off. She was hospitalized. He should have gotten way more then 5 years

[@ProblemsNeverEnd]

For the Sandra Massey, go back to the beginning when they first arrived at her place. Both officers started to walk away after checking in on her. Her alledeged m*rder stopped and asked her about medication, DELAYING them from leaving. If he was "in fear of his life" why didn't he leave when he first started to leave and why didn't he make sure his body cam was on? I hope the prosecution will do their due diligence and investigate her alledeged m*rder's connection to people that may be connected to Ms. Massey. Her family deserves the truth.

[@Toi74]

$5 bucks says they’ve reached out to the courts as well. This is very very disturbing and scary for us ALL!

[@StarterVillian]

If the judge knew that is unsurmountable for the state

[@GrandWren23]

They reached out to Lally.

[@Limitedonathios]

@@GrandWren23 they reach out out to the defense first. Then the prosecution. People are suspecting that they also tried to reach the court directly as welll

[@ILoveDogs1970]

@@LimitedonathiosI think next they should Lawyer up and take it to the media see how fast the DA’s office starts to change their tune

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

@@Toi74 They didn't reach out to Courts. That's paranoid thinking.

[@Zamo666]

It seemed as if Judged wanted the jury to come out with a guilty verdict.

[@bethryan9077]

Unlike soo many within the public domain, the judge is a very smart human being.

[@MelSan-jc8nk]

The judge knew. She read it wrong.

[@coolingwater9802]

Prayers for You Karen 🙏 ❤️ stay strong girl !

[@cfrias73]

Here we go again, trying to defend this killer and lier.

[@timelymanner-nz]

The judge told the jury not to fill in the form until they have a verdict on all counts. The ARCCA experts hold the key.

[@JupiterRising2525]

This judge is shady and should not be dealing with this case. She should be fired. Is what she did even legal.

[@MsFitz11]

They wrote these very detailed well thought out notes to the judge, but forgot to mention that they decided on 2 counts. If they were so steadfast on these counts, they could have added that in the note. It makes zero sense and it is too little, too late. There was a mistrial declared and the defense did NOT ask to poll the jury, so that is on them.

[@BlessedMomfmTexas]

Auntie bev needs to make the jury Intrustions, way more simple. All these charges are ridiculous. The CW literally pilled on a bunch of charges. Its ludicrous.

[@tinab3627]

Auntie Bev needs to go. Period. She made so many mistakes

[@shaylynned8786]

@@tinab3627 Not letting AJ get answers to pertinent questions for his case is one of the bigger ones, and her, is that an objection Mr Lally, leading him, are you objecting Mr Lally, her cough signals, I actually thought Mr Lally was helping the Defense at times purposely, I dont think he believes this case himself but had to take the job.

[@bethryan9077]

The prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Karen Read deliberately reversed her ten ton truck to instantly do 24.2 miles per hour for 62 feet when her boyfriend took her glass of vodka off her drunk ass & she left Officer John O'Keefe mortally injured to then freeze to death. It is nobodies fault that a couple of jurors had the brains of a sieve.

[@goll58]

​​@@bethryan9077The prosecution absolutely did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt she backed up into him and ran him over. Let's say hypothetically she did, there is no way a cocktail glass could cut through thick sleeves like that in this type of situation One of the defense witnesses explained how it's essentially impossible for those injuries, to be caused by a vehicle. Did you not see that part of the trial or are you just that biased and do not want to see the truth. I went into thinking she did it, however science and extremely smart people led me to what happened. And that does not include Officer O'Keeffe being run over. I guess the officers being investigated doesn't matter either huh?

[@CrazyMaryJo]

Policeman might not understand the word “rebuke”? A word I never heard in church but I still still somehow know the meaning. What kind of idiots are we hiring to police 👮 us?

[@IndianOutlaw1870]

'Rebuke' used to be 8th grade vocabulary.

[@CrazyMaryJo]

@@IndianOutlaw1870 Thank you; my recollection is not that it is a 50 cent word 🤣. Back in the day we used to be well read by 8th grade. 70 years ago for me.

[@amandastander.7635]

⚖⚖Karen Read did not kill, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe.⚖⚖

[@Juke582]

Yes she did!

[@stevenprice6957]

She definitely did. Too many people believe in conspiracy theories without a shred of evidence. Maybe you are one? Not sure. She’s a cold woman. Black heart Karen.

[@marykaiconomou9254]

​@@Juke582agree

[@mandystrong8196]

Yes she did!

[@lvwbippi]

@@Juke582explain the dog bites on his arm! Her vehicle did not make those marks.

[@Ji5-24]

The defense “blame game” yet with no proof continues via this Motion: 1. There are no affidavits of the alleged four jurors attesting to such allegations (as were filed with the Motion in the Alex Murdaugh trial when jurors made certain allegations) and the other eight jurors have not come forward making any such allegations. 2. Further, the defense were given a full opportunity to be heard throughout deliberations and had (forcefully) sought and obtained changes to the jury slips and consented to them, they sought the Tuey-Rodriguez, and thereafter repeatedly and eagerly favoured/pushed for a mistrial to be declared (Yannetti stating, quote: “I think exhaustive is the operative word here” in regards to the jury’s deliberations). 3. From that point, the reasonsable anticipation of a mistrial was apparent to the defense. They even took a “victory lap” (even though it wasn’t a victory at all) after the mistrial was declared and gave an interview on the court steps reflecting such, yet now want to blame everyone else for their own failure to say or do something at the time. 4. Furthermore, the judge can ask if the jury were hung on any of the verdicts, however she was not obliged to and when you review the final jury note (#4) it clearly indicated the jury were not hung on any of the verdicts, to any reasonable minded person. 5. The Motion will fail because the rule of law and numerous case law dictates what the defense seeks is not lawful in these circumstances for many and obvious reasons (as any proper and truthful legally minded person would/should know). 6. Yet they continue to waste tax payers money (court time and resources) on unmeritorious Motions, defense’s and arguments, that are never proven or meritorious, and their never ending “blame game” yet with no proof continues … go figure!

[@Jojosunshine6]

PERHAPS if the Judge made the instructions clearer the jury wouldn't have been confused, but let's be serious, this case oooozed with corruption, right down to tainting the jury. AWFUL.

[@shaylynned8786]

Every Judge needs to go and listen to the Judge give the Jury Instructions in the Ashley Benefield trial..thats how it should be in all trials.

[@Jojosunshine6]

@SunsetBlue-r2e she also said that she would give new written instructions but what she was saying "to them now supercedes those instructions " with does that even mean??!! Remember my words now and pay no attention to the written instructions?!

[@Ji5-24]

@@Jojosunshine6 I don't think she actually said that at all.

[@Jojosunshine6]

@@Ji5-24 she did

[@christinecarr4110]

I am a mental health clinician and by reading the histories of these young children their parents often set them up to be the scapegoats for the parents dysfunction and inability to discipline & parent....🚩🚩even disabled people need discipline sometimes even more.. it's heartbreaking💔 to see all the adolescents in the mental hospital where the parents are still scapegoating them instead of looking at their own pathology and the family system and there's a good book "people of the lie" by Dr Scott Peck. A psychiatrist that explains it all... Very very heartbreaking 💔🚩

[@christinecarr4110]

Q❤ the way that it went down is going to expose auntie Bev 100% 🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥

[@yvettebarnett5019]

Trooper Paul started his testing on Key Cycle 1164. He showed Karen went 24 mph driving backward on key cycle 1162. Key cycle 1162 is when the cops/tow truck driver confiscated Karens car, They drove it backwards, then forward onto the tow truck. There is video of it. Karen is innocent.

[@Billie-p2t]

Karen read is evil. Just look at the snarled face she pulls when Paul O’Keefe says “ it’s not over yet” within her earshot. The hatred on that woman’s face is palpable. The O’Keefe family had to sit close to this sycophant every day, watching her smirking and gurning, whilst the death of John was played out in graphic detail. She’s never once shown any respect or compassion for these people. I hope she gets a sentence of some type when she’s eventually found guilty in the next trial. She shouldn’t get off Scott free. I can’t believe that there are so many cultish followers of this woman, who are not seeing what’s in front of their eyes. They say a picture says a thousand words, well just look at Karen reads face when she hears Paul O’Keefe remark.

[@RoseGrace100]

You must be Jen McCabe.

[@ILoveDogs1970]

@@RoseGrace100YUP!!!

[@tammymcclarty8272]

Agreed shes evil

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

@@Billie-p2t She sure doesn't appear to have any love for the Officer.. She has a Reptilian Vibe to her with her Snake 🐍 Eyes. It's amazing how stupidly the people who follow her are.

[@Billie-p2t]

@@RoseGrace100 stepford wives syndrome! 🧝🏻‍♀️

[@Chris-wn9hi]

Who backs over someone with an attempted murder? In numerous previous cases, it would be full frontal assault, with possibly a back up to finish 'the job'. It makes no sense that Karen would do this. Coupled with the incredibly suspicious activity of John's supposed friends, police officers, too numerous to state now, this case is completely corrupt!

[@el676]

Seems like a rookie mistake not to pull the jury. I’ve literally seen that in every case ever.

[@JRay.R]

@@el676 yeah, when there’s a verdict declared.

[@barbarafreitas239]

I blame the judge…. She was too preoccupied being on the prosecution side and neglected her own job. The jurors obviously needed instructions…

[@Luvlacek3]

The judge did her job. The jury’s letter said that they did understand.

[@barbarafreitas239]

@@Luvlacek3 but they didn’t…

[@bethryan9077]

You are still believing whatever Read & her clowns put out to the media & all media entities are still making Money off their BS due to soo many like yourself. Jeez. Grow Up.

[@akc621]

This was a pretty dumb jury not to tell the judge that they reached a verdict on two counts. They really misled everyone saying they were "deeply divided."

[@kabbystevens5167]

Or misled by the jury instructions by the judge “teaching” them the law

[@Headcase650]

You have to keep in mind that those statements were written by the jury foreman. You know the guy who was picked before the alternates were randomly excluded. I don't know if it's true or not but I thought I read that the foreman was a retired cop. And how do you pick the foreman before randomly excluding the alternates. It's like the judge had predetermined who she wanted to be the foreman.

[@josefinasoderholm6488]

The whole point of the jury system is that the jury is made up by ordinary people. People who don’t know the law, don’t have court room experience. How were they supposed to know that they should/could do that?! There were nothing in the information or jury instructions about this. The court/the judge are responsible for the trial process and the jury. If the jury didn’t understand/knew how and what to do it’s the courts/the judges fault. Jury instructions needs to be perfectly clear and the judge should make sure all jurors have understood. If jurors are misunderstanding the court/judge hasn’t done their job! And it should be in the courts/justice systems interest to investigate what went wrong here. This is the weakness of the jury system (or one of them) how can you believe justice will prevail if the jury doesn’t have the right information about how to do their duty? There is a reason why U,S has the most wrongfully convicted in the whole world.

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

Yes I Agree with you !! NOW they're going to have to go through another trial all over again !! OMG

[@akc621]

@@josefinasoderholm6488 I am an ordinary person with zero legal experience and if I was on that jury, I would have insisted the foreman ask the question, especially if the jury instructions weren't clear and considering how much time was spent on the whole trial. I do agree with you that the judge shares the blame too. Before she declared a mistrial, she should have confirmed if they really couldn't reach a verdict on any count.

[@FarmGirl-s9c]

The judge specifically told them not to tell anyone (not even her) about their verdict

[@aizencollier6285]

You can be so smart and not see the small meanings smh imagine hit at 25 miles an hour like seriously,that whole side crushed not scratched

[@stephaniemersfelder5973]

Judge seemed to have an attitude the whole time and really annoyed it came down to a mistrial.

[@Ji5-24]

The judge also allowed the dog bit witness in even though the Defense breached the rules. What you said doesn't mean she did anything wrong in regards to this new Defense motion. It can't stand at law and it will fail because the law dictates it must not because of anything you allege.

[@WindsofChange]

Well, apparently he needed rebuking. She didn't even say it with venom, just tired annoyance.

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

I thought it was bizzare what the old Lady said to the officer about rebuking etc.... Honestly why would she say ANYTHING??? All she had to do was turn off the stove and slide the water over. Leave it but everything got Complicated when she picked up the pot of hot water !!! In my opinion she got herself shot because of her Big Mouth.

[@WindsofChange]

@@StephanieFlower-d9j She could have called them pieces of dog crap and have used a few other choice sailor words....freedom of speech- it's guaranteed to us all. They still can't take retribution against her in any way for it. If their feelings get hurt because she infers that the Lord wouldn't approve and they are doing evil enough to shoot her then she's right- they need to be more than rebuked....and they shouldn't be cops. He'll be found guilty as he should be. You can't shoot someone because they offend you.

[@davidretondo2871]

You dear person, sound like you may have one as well. If you truly believe those words are her fault, I rebuke you in the name of Jesus. I also pray for you deliverance. ​@StephanieFlower-d9j

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

@@davidretondo2871 Words carry energy. Thoughts make energy. She triggered something in the officer to cause him to react the Way he did. I'm not saying it's right or wrong but we must be cognizant of the thoughts that form in our minds to carry the words and energy that we speak...

[@isabelferreira6660]

WHAT A WICKED JUDGE!

[@bethryan9077]

Not everyone drank Karen Read's dirty Kool Aid lovey. Jeez.

[@ILoveDogs1970]

Absolutely 100%

[@naomiwells5158]

It would be interesting to know if the jury had told the judge in the note or after if they were unanimous about any

[@Ms.BeaHavenOXO]

Karen Read: The judge's conduct was questionable and should be investigated along with the less than ethical cops...ESPECIALLY with her being related and or having connections with those cops.

[@JRay.R]

They don’t HAVE to believe “the conspiracy” in order to believe that Karen Read didn’t hit John O’keefe.

[@Star-hk6gc]

The justice system is in place for a purpose. Jurors may think twice later but when it’s done it’s done.

[@cksportscards623]

But what about all the lying on the stand from the prosecution witnesses? That is very odd to me.

[@Ji5-24]

What about: 1. During KR’s arraignment hearing at the Stoughton District Court on 2 February 2022 (whereby KR was aged 41, as a (supposed) intelligent, assertive and forthright person, and having legal representation) the following occurred and was confirmed. 2. Yannetti gave submissions for quite some time and represented to the Court that KR lacked any criminal intent in what was referred to as a “motor vehicle accident”. 3. KR had told LE at the time: (a). She dropped JO off because she was having stomach issues (this contradicts her subsequent calls and voice mails and what she told JO’s niece that they had an argument, that night). (b). She made a three point turn in the road and left (this is an admittance of reversing her SUV in Fairview Road as was verified at the trial). (c). She did not see JO enter, or go to, the Alberts house (as verified via the trial along with JO’s GPS and Apple data showing he did not go to the house and did not move from where he was found). (d). She first observed her broken taillight that morning and did not know how she broke it (this contradicts the later story that it was broken due to her hitting JO’s SUV with her SUV). (e). She said at the time of finding JO: “I hit him” three times (no one made this up later as some people are alleging). (f). There was no mention of any police cover up or anything of that nature, or that anyone was involved in JO’s passing, or that KR didn’t know what happened to JO, or that she had nothing to do with his passing. 4. Yannetti told reporters outside of court: (a). “KR was in shock”. (b). “JO’s death had been an innocent accident”. (c). “KR had no criminal intent”. (d). “KR loved this man and was devastated”. 5. Via a later interview KR’s father advised she had said to him at the time: (a). “Dad I think I struck something”. (b). “I remember backing up and hitting something” (again verifying KR reversing her SUV as verified at the trial, along with some sort of accident occurring at that exact time, and via her SUV data). (c). KR was obviously not referring to hitting JO’s vehicle as she would not have used the word “something”. 6. KR’s words that night via voicemails: “John I f***ing hate you”, “John I’m here with your f***ing kids”, “You are a f***ing pervert”, “I’m with your f***ing niece and nephew”, “You’re a f***ing loser” and “F**** yourself”. The venom in her voice and obsession in the fifty three (53) calls she made to him, and also the texts she sent earlier that day, appear to indicate instability/rage/anger. 7. KR later stated (via an interview): “What I thought could have happened was that did I incapacitate him unwittingly, somehow, and then in his drunkenness, he passed out”. 8. The above statement of KR is so close to what the CW are stating happened and the evidence in the trial (except the CW believe she hit JO intentionally) and if the defense current Motion is true - the jurors also believed she hit JO (eg. Juror quote: “none of us believed she hit him on purpose”). 9. KR’s own words via the above statement also lines up with what she said at the time, that she didn’t see JO go to the house (which his GPS and Apple data also proves he didn’t). 10. Eg. How could she even think that she could have incapacitated JO etc, if she saw him go to the house - it would be impossible and why would any person generally even think such a thing. 11. It appears that what KR said at the time is true (usually generally would be the case) and at her arraignment, etc, what she has said since is untrue. 12. The above is all publicly out there for people to watch for themselves and can’t be denied.

[@cksportscards623]

@@Ji5-24 yeah, i watched the whole thing everyday and I disagree with you, respectfully.

[@cksportscards623]

@@Ji5-24 ooohhh wait a second point 10 is a good one.

[@Ji5-24]

@@cksportscards623 That’s ok….you are actually disagreeing with her then because she admitted it both directly and indirectly. Continue on believing therefore she’s a liar when she did that. Those of us with more than three brain cells agree she’s a compulsive liar, respectfully.

[@cksportscards623]

@@Ji5-24 I appreciate the comment. Still cant get over the fact that all of the witnesses were lying, destroying phones, butt dialing etc.

[@Ji5-24]

KR defense team repeatedly fail with this car salesmen “blame game but no proof”! Round 1 - They failed with their unmeritorious pre-trial motions. Round 2 - Then via the trial. Whilst the prosecution has a burden of proof, when the defense said KR was framed, in the eyes of the jury they made this case a binary decision - either she’s guilty or she was framed and how they cast this case. They put the burden on themselves and had to deliver at least something proving it and definitively. Defending and proving the defense was as important as the prosecution proving beyond a reasonable doubt and extremely pertinent in this particular case. But yet, they didn’t ask the big questions of the big witnesses, couldn’t name/prove the alleged third party culprit, didn’t prove the alleged frame job and conspiracy and didn’t get a not guilty verdict (nor in one day as alleged). Smoke and mirrors, red herring fallacies and an innocence fraud campaign. Round 3 - Now this new motion which is bound to fail. Round 4 - The retrial. Whilst the tax payers keep footing the voluminous bills (for court time and resources) which the defense team and KR love to keep wasting. Go figure! 💸💸💸💸

[@gaylereid8264]

AMEN

[@JRay.R]

@@Ji5-24 she’s not choosing to be prosecuted… it’s the commonwealths choice at this point to have a retrial. It’s not fair to say she’s enjoying wasting the money of the taxpayers when it’s the commonwealth using taxpayer money to bring the charges against her and she’s spending money to defend herself with private attorneys.

[@Ji5-24]

@@JRay.R You don’t seem to get the points. If she’s running a dodgy defence, filing motions that are unmeritorious, that causes wasted court time and resources - which tax payers pay for.

[@joancollins522]

My goodness....why did Karen Read be brought on trial for murder if it was a load of people inside in that house who committed the murder????....who decided that it was a woman with at least 10 vodkas inside her didn't back her Lexus jeep over her boyfriend??....poor man and his family.....yeah it is definitely believable I am sure that the people in that house invited some friends around to their house....and then decided to kill that lovely man....dump him outside their front door...and go to bed.....THAT NEVER HAPPENED

[@Ji5-24]

The jurors believed she hit JO based on the evidence at the trial. So yes she should go to trial again obviously.

[@nickychargreaves1111]

I don't think the judge was fair in this trial at all

[@nickychargreaves1111]

Surely the judge should have checked the jury was hung on all charges?

[@forthebeez]

She needs to be retried. The defense never requested the jury be polled. She killed him and she needs to be held accountable.

[@fancykat4]

Pathetic that Bev Cannone was triggered by Karen Read for laughing 🤣 EXCUSE MEEEE?? you find this funny Miss Read? Bev reacting like she’s the one on trial.

[@Ji5-24]

It’s called managing the court room and ensuring everyone abides by mandatory court etiquette….KR acting as vile as usual!

[@greeneyes9310]

I blame the judge

[@holylandfan3275]

17:58 No, it isn’t when “The Lord rebuked Jesus.”. WRONG! Jesus rebuked hypocrites. Jesus wasn’t rebuked. 😡

[@IndianOutlaw1870]

I know, right?

[@marrplam6232]

Finally! Bev judge was abs a shitty judge, i watched this trial I was appaled by her conduct and Lally's...what a disgrace for the taxpayers money and very scary for US!

[@Ji5-24]

The defense team repeatedly fail with this car salesmen “blame game but no proof”! Round 1 - They failed with their unmeritorious pre-trial motions. Round 2 - Then via the trial. Whilst the prosecution has a burden of proof, when the defense said KR was framed, in the eyes of the jury they made this case a binary decision - either she’s guilty or she was framed and how they cast this case. They put the burden on themselves and had to deliver at least something proving it and definitively. Defending and proving the defense was as important as the prosecution proving beyond a reasonable doubt and extremely pertinent in this particular case. But yet, they didn’t ask the big questions of the big witnesses, couldn’t name/prove the alleged third party culprit, didn’t prove the alleged frame job and conspiracy and didn’t get a not guilty verdict (nor in one day as alleged). Smoke and mirrors, red herring fallacies and an innocence fraud campaign. Round 3 - Now this new motion which is bound to fail. Round 4 - The retrial. Whilst the tax payers keep footing the voluminous bills (for court time and resources) which the defense team and KR love to keep wasting. Go figure! 💸💸💸💸

[@jamirfilms]

Way better than Julie grant!!

[@Eva-gz2ki]

@@jamirfilms I was just thinking the same :)

[@Seashea]

Agree

[@jihanjude6634]

Karen Read is innocent.

[@carrow1057]

Thank you for not having biased Julie Grant on today. Perhaps she would be unable to face the reality of the juror NOT GUILTY ON 1 and 3? Very unprofessional on Julie's behalf. Her acerbic take had to trip her up eventually.

[@duchessmartinez2035]

Had there been a not guilty on each count, this wouldn't be an issue............. The defense brought this up before jury deliberations..........

[@kathyb1188]

Agreed, Bev also told them not to fill in the form until they had come to a verdict on all counts

[@Seashea]

Exactly! The instructions told them NOT to fill out the verdict form until that had an unanimous decision on ALL counts

[@Riverpuppies]

There was no not guilty verdict

[@MarkG-h2y]

12 jurors disagree with you.

[@Riverpuppies]

@@MarkG-h2y a mistrial is not the same thing as not guilty

[@marykaiconomou9254]

She might not be a killer but guilty of manslaughter. She should be telling the truth because she is guilty of hitting him in her drunkenness.

[@Empresstya]

Arcca experts are the key. He wasn't hit by a car, her car wasn't damaged by hitting a person. Her tail light was clearly not in 47 pieces at 5am.

[@MrGrumpyGills]

His injuries were not consistent with being hit by a car. He must've had a crouching position because there's no way his face (and only the face) would've been hit by that tail light had he been standing. Why would he crouch and look up in the direction of the car, not moving? How would being hit in the face by a slowly backing up car have send him rolling several feet away, while no shards or splinters of said tail light were stuck to his injuries? No blood or anything on the undercarriage of the car?

[@TheTruth-kh2im]

One day means never. I am sorry but she did it. I don't think she meant for him to die. I think both of them were drunk.

[@VTPSTTU]

I never believed the conspiracy angle, but as the whole situation becomes a bigger and bigger mess, I start to doubt my initial impressions. At this point, I would like someone other than this judge to question the jurors. I want someone who is independent to be able to ask whether the jurors were really split on anything or whether they were pressured into something. I want to be sure that the jurors actually agreed to the language of that note without pressure from the judge or anyone else. I still don't believe that those people conspired to kill Mr. O'Keefe before that night. I'm still not even sure whether he was hit by a vehicle or whether that was Ms. Read's vehicle. I know that all of the state's main witnesses were evasive in their answers and came across as dishonest. They have zero credibility.

[@frienda315]

Where is my comment going? I simply said Karen Is guilty!

[@kristinadaubney2068]

I blame the Judge 👩‍⚖️ her instructions were not clear to the jury. She should have told them they vote on each charge separately.

[@DigitalMoneyMichelle]

I find it suspicious the cop standing by the door while the jury was deliberating was involved in the cover up. Who knows what they ask him & if he responded appropriately

[@stephaniemersfelder5973]

Yes release the whole video unblurred!

[@Morenie124]

They are allowed to change their minds after trial is over? They go home and read/watch videos and decide something else? Not sure how that going to work.

[@Lc0522]

That's not at all what happened

[@Morenie124]

@@Lc0522 and how do you know? Are you a juror?

[@josefinasoderholm6488]

The fact that anyone even obtain the ide that the police shooting a woman in her own home was in any fear for his life or had any right to do so is beyond me. She was no threat to him at this point. He had a weapon, she used words. There was a distance between them and a kitchen counter between them. Cops in other parts of the world doesn’t act like this! You have a huge issue with who gets to become law enforcement officers and their training. There’s a huge lack of knowledge/training in how to approach people with mental illness/disabilitys. And there is a huge issue in how law enforcement are allowed to use their weapon

[@Friendofstfrank]

And it is a huge country in population (335 million) and in terms of size

[@josefinasoderholm6488]

@@Friendofstfrank yes. U,S is a huge country, and yes it has a huge population. Of course there is differences in different states and city’s. But of what I can see there are issues all over the country. There desperately needs to be a change in how law enforcement is trained!! And there needs to be a change in procedure when deciding on who to hire I liv in a much smaller country. But last year we had about 34 police shootings. Half of them was a police shooting at a person. The other half was shooting warning shots into the air. Not a single one was shot dead. I’m 42, I have never seen a police with their weapons drawn at someone. Our police academy is 2 years full time university studies and then 6 months as a police cadet. But to ewe get to enroll at the academy you have to endure both physical and psychological testing. Our police are trained not to use their weapons unless it’s absolutely necessary. They are trained to view communication as there most effective weapon and they are trained to de-escalate situations instead of as in this case and so many others escalate the situation. So yes, it’s a big country, there are differences throughout the country BUT there are systemic faults in policing and training all over the country. That’s why we se situations like this one and thousands of others in which police escalates situations, don’t know how to interact with people with mental health issues/ disabilities/substance abuse, being aggressive, physical, reactive and so on over and over and over. It isn’t only some bad apples or some bad apple trees… it’s a systemic and fundamental issue. All over your big country

[@jessicaschulatz514]

She said tgey had all they needed and could not help on other questions and the verdict slip said do not fill out unless you have a unanimus verdict.

[@tammymcclarty8272]

Which they supposedly did on two counts

[@forthebeez]

"Fundamental differences"....the jury was not polled. Defense did not request it. It is on them. In fact, I wonder if the defense did something inappropriate here, they seem to be pretty sleezy.

[@christine6205]

Yea... Like the The cover up theroy Lol!! They had nothing else to use as a defense what are gonna say she hit him?? Like she told her father..quote I think I may of hit something wow

[@MrGrumpyGills]

@@christine6205 May have. May of makes no sense.

[@SandileMabena-p9g]

Karen was clearly framed n the judge knows very well she should be investigated

[@Ji5-24]

Where are you going with all this, are you going to take over KR’s defense. Oh wait …. did you not get the memo that the FBI already investigated the frame job and the conspiracy theory (even calling on a Federal Grand Jury) and finalised it via a 3,700 page report and found no evidence of such and no charges/indictments were laid against anyone - charges still only against KR. Evidence not there then - it’s not there now - it never will be. Otherwise, surely you are not alleging that the FBI and the FGJ are also “IN ON IT”. Have you reported your concerns and thoughts as a person who thinks they know more than the FBI and without; the case files, the appropriate and necessary training, expertise and access to their high level software, etc, to the FBI’s superior governing body, to see if there is anyone there who cares 🤔. Otherwise, a waste of YT space and people’s time reading comments about matters that have already been investigated by the FBI.

[@ellieokeefe27]

Note written by judge chosen foreman..

[@Ji5-24]

Judges always choose the foreperson in Massachusetts….no conspiracy theory there

[@lawhana9127]

Im so happy to see Julia J., rather than Julie G. Julia is a true professional instead of a fake drama queen. CTV would do well to just let her do research, not give her a desk in public !

[@TeaandLaceJournals]

I will never understand how this went to trial considering the autopsy and the fact that anyone can see that those injuries weren’t caused by a car backing into him. He just stood there and watched while she, in the snow, backed up for that long. It’s almost comical. Dog bites confirmed by experts. Even the experts for the prosecution couldn’t say those injuries were consistent with an automobile.

[@MrGrumpyGills]

Very true! Also, he must've had a crouching position because there's no way his face (and only the face) would've been hit by that tail light had he been standing. Why would he crouch and look up in the direction of the car, not moving? How would being hit in the face by a slowly backing up car have send him rolling several feet away, while no shards or splinters of said tail light were stuck to his injuries? No blood or anything on the undercarriage of the car? I remember some commenters saying "don't overthink it" - I wonder how exactly everything played out in their heads and somehow made sense. Or did they not think at all? That actually sounds quite likely.

[@Ji5-24]

Where are you going with all this, are you going to take over KR’s defense. Oh wait …. did you not get the memo that the FBI already investigated the frame job and the conspiracy theory (even calling on a Federal Grand Jury) and finalised it via a 3,700 page report and found no evidence of such and no charges/indictments were laid against anyone - charges still only against KR. Evidence not there then - it’s not there now - it never will be. Otherwise, surely you are not alleging that the FBI and the FGJ are also “IN ON IT”. Have you reported your concerns and thoughts as a person who thinks they know more than the FBI and without; the case files, the appropriate and necessary training, expertise and access to their high level software, etc, to the FBI’s superior governing body, to see if there is anyone there who cares 🤔. Otherwise, a waste of YT space and people’s time reading comments about matters that have already been investigated by the FBI.

[@MilkCartonMemoir]

@@TeaandLaceJournals right, it's like this exact comment keeps appearing on these channels? Tainting future jurors much

[@TamiFowler1]

That mother is lucky that her son didn’t kill that teacher. He could be doing life in prison.

[@nickychargreaves1111]

Oh that brother is something else...

[@angelbaybi997]

well I knew it or close to it...all along I said she did kill him but she never meant to kill him...but she knew she hit him

[@nevadatan7323]

However you feel about her guilt,the Defense were successful in proving reasonable doubt. I seriously question the motives of those on the jury who can still consider a guilty verdict when scientific evidence doesn't corroborate the Prosecutions version of events and the witnesses were shadier than a powercut

[@sashawood3657]

Will be pretty awkward when every LEO has to admit they're either fired or under investigation on the stand 😂 if Tully has to testify again it's gunna be delicious!

[@Ji5-24]

1. During KR’s arraignment hearing at the Stoughton District Court on 2 February 2022 (whereby KR was aged 41, as a (supposed) intelligent, assertive and forthright person, and having legal representation) the following occurred and was confirmed. 2. Yannetti gave submissions for quite some time and represented to the Court that KR lacked any criminal intent in what was referred to as a “motor vehicle accident”. 3. KR had told LE at the time: (a). She dropped JO off because she was having stomach issues (this contradicts her subsequent calls and voice mails and what she told JO’s niece that they had an argument, that night). (b). She made a three point turn in the road and left (this is an admittance of reversing her SUV in Fairview Road as was verified at the trial). (c). She did not see JO enter, or go to, the Alberts house (as verified via the trial along with JO’s GPS and Apple data showing he did not go to the house and did not move from where he was found). (d). She first observed her broken taillight that morning and did not know how she broke it (this contradicts the later story that it was broken due to her hitting JO’s SUV with her SUV). (e). She said at the time of finding JO: “I hit him” three times (no one made this up later as some people are alleging). (f). There was no mention of any police cover up or anything of that nature, or that anyone was involved in JO’s passing, or that KR didn’t know what happened to JO, or that she had nothing to do with his passing. 4. Yannetti told reporters outside of court: (a). “KR was in shock”. (b). “JO’s death had been an innocent accident”. (c). “KR had no criminal intent”. (d). “KR loved this man and was devastated”. 5. Via a later interview KR’s father advised she had said to him at the time: (a). “Dad I think I struck something”. (b). “I remember backing up and hitting something” (again verifying KR reversing her SUV as verified at the trial, along with some sort of accident occurring at that exact time, and via her SUV data). (c). KR was obviously not referring to hitting JO’s vehicle as she would not have used the word “something”. 6. KR’s words that night via voicemails: “John I f***ing hate you”, “John I’m here with your f***ing kids”, “You are a f***ing pervert”, “I’m with your f***ing niece and nephew”, “You’re a f***ing loser” and “F**** yourself”. The venom in her voice and obsession in the fifty three (53) calls she made to him, and also the texts she sent earlier that day, appear to indicate instability/rage/anger. 7. KR later stated (via an interview): “What I thought could have happened was that did I incapacitate him unwittingly, somehow, and then in his drunkenness, he passed out”. 8. The above statement of KR is so close to what the CW are stating happened and the evidence in the trial (except the CW believe she hit JO intentionally) and if the defense current Motion is true - the jurors also believed she hit JO (eg. Juror quote: “none of us believed she hit him on purpose”). 9. KR’s own words via the above statement also lines up with what she said at the time, that she didn’t see JO go to the house (which his GPS and Apple data also proves he didn’t). 10. Eg. How could she even think that she could have incapacitated JO etc, if she saw him go to the house - it would be impossible and why would any person generally even think such a thing. 11. It appears that what KR said at the time is true (usually generally would be the case) and at her arraignment, etc, what she has said since is untrue. 12. The above is all publicly out there for people to watch for themselves and can’t be denied.

[@nickychargreaves1111]

The judge wanted to be the star of this show

[@tigerlily102511]

Sad to see just how clueless that jury was. Defense attorney proved beyond a reasonable doubt that there was police corruption. I guess some people are just too naive and live in a land of unicorns, rainbows, cupcakes and perfect police officers who would never commit crimes or do anything wrong. I wish I could live there but unfortunately, I live in reality.

[@Ji5-24]

Where are you going with all this, are you going to take over KR’s defense. Oh wait …. did you not get the memo that the FBI already investigated the frame job and the conspiracy theory (even calling on a Federal Grand Jury) and finalised it via a 3,700 page report and found no evidence of such and no charges/indictments were laid against anyone - charges still only against KR. Evidence not there then - it’s not there now - it never will be. Otherwise, surely you are not alleging that the FBI and the FGJ are also “IN ON IT”. Have you reported your concerns and thoughts as a person who thinks they know more than the FBI and without; the case files, the appropriate and necessary training, expertise and access to their high level software, etc, to the FBI’s superior governing body, to see if there is anyone there who cares 🤔. Otherwise, a waste of YT space and people’s time reading comments about matters that have already been investigated by the FBI.

[@stevenprice6957]

I Still believe there could be footage of Karen swiping John and the free Karen’s would say she’s innocent 😅 Imagine if this was a male who was obsessed , unhinged and a cheater, who killed a woman and letting her die slowly. Imagine the uproar. There would be no one wanting him to get away with it. Yet here we are. Nothing Karen does is wrong. Her lies are just avoided. Her actions avoided. Her admissions avoided. Strange stuff.

[@REALFakeAdolfo]

I'm legit disturbed by how many people have become brainwashed and believe the conspiracy

[@stevenprice6957]

@@REALFakeAdolfoThe human mind. Hard to explain the way people think so illogically. I don’t get it.

[@TeeJayNZ]

@@stevenprice6957to be fair lots of them still think a dog was involved and that John entered that house and that she didn’t actually say she hit John that she said could I … so believing misinformation is a huge part of it all .

[@reasonable342]

I completely agree. These people just don’t have the mental capacity to discern credible evidence from distractions put out there by the defense. I’m just glad to hear that 9 of the 12 jurors at least recognize that she did hit him with her car, if we believe what has come out.

[@SJSummers01]

…& the taillight bit like a rabid dog too, huh? Over & over his arm from shoulder to wrist. Not one bruise or broken bone below the nose. He was beaten to death IN THE HOUSE. Imagine - U might be a first responder, a cop, a fellow cop dead on your lawn - U don’t come outside. U don’t attempt CPR on an alleged friend that was in your house a few hours prior….& NOBODY goes inside the house to rule it out S part of crime scene. Imagine U get away with beating him to death with your friend & son. Imagine. That’s the McAlberts.

[@dvb1746]

Maybe unclear jury instructions

[@chrissyellem7397]

Apparently this dumb jury didn't remember what we all learned in 2nd grade-there is no bad question. They had plenty of time to send notes to the judge for help/explanation. There were 11 other jurors that could have spoken up other than the Foreman. If he wasn't doing the job the others felt was right they could have approached the judge. Just like when they didn't like that other juror said that KR was making too many faces. Then that juror got excused. I guess when it was crunch time the jurors were a bunch of chickens.

[@wildmercuryfilms]

YOU NAILED IT!!!!! I AGREE WITH EVERY SINGLE WORD!!!! YOU USED THE WORD CHICKENS --- ANOTHER WORD IS P--IES. ANOTHER WORD IS IDIOTS!!!! Yes, one of them could have went out to the cop and said: “I WANT TO TALK TO THE JUDGE RIGHT NOW.” Then say: “The Foreman is trying to STOP US from telling you we have 2 Not Guilty Verdicts. That’s because he’s an idiot. We have 2 Not Guilty Verdicts, and NO ONE IS GOING TO STOP ME FROM TELLING YOU!!!”

[@Ji5-24]

@@wildmercuryfilms maybe it’s because it didn’t happen that way at all…..no jurors have done any affidavits at all…..wonder why 🤔💥🎯

[@markieffmorris9263]

DOESNT MATTER THEY ARE NOT JURORS AND THEIR DELIBERATIONS BACK WHEN THEY WERE ARE ENTIRELY MOOT

[@krisjustkris7970]

I don't understand WHY the jury didn't just find Karen Read "Not Guilty" if in fact they ALL agreed she didn't it or if she did, she didn't know that she did. NOT GUILTY!! I hope they dismiss this case as they should.

[@mariaparkinson8150]

Alice in Wonderland ‘s trial was more believable. Bad, bad acting.

[@hellcat2254]

Court TV was so biased on this case I can’t barely make myself watch this.

[@skiarytn6744]

Justice for Sonya Massey 🕊️

[@1rembo69]

if there were three charges then there should been documents for each count to make guilty or not guilty!!!! So, there were two charges of not guilty & unhung jury on the other. It is the courts/judge mistake for not asking about each charge from jury foreman. This is a court mistake & both sides didn't realize each charge needed to be ruled on by the court. The two unanumous not guilty is double jeapordy if it is charged in a new trial.

[@BlessedMomfmTexas]

FREE KAREN READ!! SHE'S FACTUALLY INNOCENT. PUTTING HER IN PRISON ISN'T JUSTICE FOR OFFICER JOHN O'KEEFE. OFFICER John O'Keefe is looking down thinking, Stop this madness. Rest in paradise 🙏 ✨️

[@stevenprice6957]

She’s factually guilty. How can 2 think so differently? You and I? Maybe look again at the evidence. The FBI found no cover up and what, you did ? Lol

[@cfawcett9870]

​@@stevenprice6957what are you talking about? The commonwealth's me said he wasn't hit by a car. The arcca experts said she wasn't hit by a car. The FBI haven't concluded their investigation yet as far as I know. That's why the jury couldn't be told who hired arcca because it's still on going. There is zero chance the police claim about how he died is true, it's just not physically possible

[@marykaiconomou9254]

​@stevenprice69agree with you57

[@marykaiconomou9254]

Agree with you

[@TeeJayNZ]

@@stevenprice6957💯 agree she did it

[@joklundt]

She was rebuking the hot steamy water from harming anyone ... am I the only one that gets this ????

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

Was that her motivation for quoting scripture from the bible?? I didn't understand why she said what she quoted scripture.

[@Everyoneisanartist776]

Regardless, the REALITY is, she began the visit with a pure heart, spoke with respect and favor for the officers and died from the demented supposition of a blood thirst officer.

[@clayton56tube]

the way she said it was singsong and light, not threatening and not directed at the officer. And he was triggered by her words, nothing to do with hot water. She set the pot down before he started pointing his gun at her.

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

@@joklundt "The Hot Steamy Water" ?? Oh good Grief 🙄

[@StephanieFlower-d9j]

@@Everyoneisanartist776 The Reality is if she had kept her Big Mouth shut she'd still be alive.

[@JRay.R]

I don’t think they were confused. I think they were following instructions. The judge told them not to fill out the verdict form until they had reached unanimous agreement on all counts. So they were under the impression they were hung unless they were unanimous on all counts. Your second guest is totally right. Plus… you can’t just poll the jury during deliberations.

[@nickychargreaves1111]

Yes I agree and I don't think they realised they could say they agreed one other charges

[@tammymcclarty8272]

Defense would have known poll jury. No excuse for it

[@JRay.R]

@@tammymcclarty8272 why poll the jury as the defense? A mistrial is more of a win than a conviction.

[@casparcoaster1936]

I think he heard something he could claim was a threat.... and used it. He wanted to murder that woman, and saw an opening to commit that crime in the presence of another policeman.

[@LittleMissStamper]

Bro I rebuke you is only deadly harm if you're a DEMON 😳🤨

[@kathymccarthy5264]

There was no verdict.

[@SJSummers01]

Wrong. 3 charges; not guilty on counts 1 & 3, 12-0 unanimous. Count 2 was undecided. 1&3 were murder, so NOT GUILTY. Judge didn’t follow instructions that lead to declaring mistrial. She jumped the gun.

[@kathymccarthy5264]

@SJSummers01 there was no verdict.

[@kathymccarthy5264]

@@SJSummers01 motion denied.