Alex Jones Defense Files Emergency Motion

[@Oldhandle012]

Liar Liar 😂😂 "Objection your honour" "On what grounds?" "It's devastating to my case!"

[@tonyalynne3380]

Excellent 😆👍

[@romangeneral23]

Over ruled!!!

[@TheRealStew]

cam must be held for contempt of court

[@69Jackjones69]

That scene in the elevator always cracked me up 😆 "Mama" 🍈🍈👀

[@hezhezhez]

Touché my friend 👌

[@arturostevens3]

I have been a trial lawyer for 30 years, and this is massive, career impacting malpractice in my opinion. However, much of the material SHOULD have been discovered. There was no objection to it yesterday. Defense will lose this motion.

[@numus19]

Defense already lost the motion. Judge is giving the defense attorney 1 day to identify privilege which is her being kind, because under Texas law he had 10 days from the day of notification and there is no wiggle room in it.

[@nottiification]

I have a feeling that law students will be reading about this for years to come.

[@nukeout]

@@numus19 this is now becoming a constitutional issue because the Jan 6th committee is requesting them This judge shouldn't be giving "wiggle room"

[@GeoStreber]

Yeah that's what I'm wondering. Isn't their failure to open this already during discovery also a major sign of malpractice on at least someone's part?

[@brickyardd]

The best Jones can hope for to recoup the savage financial loss he will endure is to sue his lawyers for malpractice. 50 cent sued his lawyers for 18 million for malpractice and won..

[@realitybites1794]

If you could get a mistrial based on your own mistakes, no client would ever lose!

[@kewlztertc5386]

😆 🤣 😂 😹

[@kkeelty64]

(cue sound of thousands of Defense lawyers falling on their own swords)

[@abnnuzzinicholasclay686]

Her bias is his mistake?

[@gwine9087]

I was just about to post the same thing. 👍

[@donaldsp360]

Forget the fact that the lawyer tried to backdoor it's admission into the record by asking the defendant Abt it on the stand to open the door for admissibility!! The lawyer sent a LINK, NOT DOCUMENTS. If wrong mail is delivered, do u open it? No. Link was clicked.

[@shazstar13]

The fact the lawyer first denied having the documents they were requested to provide, and then didn’t send another link “correct” link within those ten days shows they had no intention of honouring either the law or their own word. So, no, you can’t have a mistrial.

[@eyedownload]

I can't figure out how the judge could keep a straight face! Pure professionalism! :)))

[@scientistatwork4667]

Nailed it

[@eponack]

As soon as I heard about it, it seemed to be a strategic move to make a reason to scream mistrial. They knew what they were doing.

[@annak8755]

Soooo, this is literally the "can I have a mistrial because my lawyers are incompetent" but from the lawyer's side.

[@natstar7864]

@Margie Smith It's just a delay tactic so jones can move his money so they cannot get it.

[@nickymatthews3491]

The judge was correct. If a defendant's attorney could get a mistrial by purposefully or accidentally sending his attorney-client notes to the opposing attorney, there could never be a guilty verdict.

[@rllr1117]

The judge is not correct. The plaintiff's attorney is bound by law and should have known that those files are protected information and should never have been brought to trial.

[@spaceshipenterprise9062]

@@rllr1117 I'm rolling with the judge, on this .....

[@mx7431-s5y]

The original comment is still true, if defence attorneys could just send private documents to the plaintiff / prosecution and get a mistrial, every defence would ‘accidentally’ do that whenever they’re bombing a case. That’s what’s possibly happened here, the attorney being notified of his mistake over a week ago and only now using it for a mistrial. 🤔

[@onemorething100]

@@rllr1117 Interesting. Has any of the Info they want suppressed been used as evidence in the trial? I'm confused as to exactly what they want removed as it appears the Judge is too. I thought it was fair how she ruled. They bring exactly what they want removed and rule on just that as opposed to throwing all of it out and leaving the Pros. Without

[@facts394]

Not correct. The text message - the only used material - was supposed to have been provided. It just displayed perjury. Plus if you heard the lawyer, he clearly pointed out the legal technicality of what should have been done - which was not.

[@Chew5219]

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake

[@mulemule]

Thanks, Napoleon😏

[@jessebott1879]

Always act like your hunting and being hunted in life.

[@damaka]

"please proceed, Governor" moment lmao

[@ShazammtheProducer]

that need to be on a shirt

[@cynthiabrent6479]

@@damaka I wonder if Alex Jones remembered who said that. Hint: in 2016 he also said at a commencement speech: "let the FOOL talk."😉😉😏

[@bukworm]

I think we can all come together and fans and foes of Alex Jones to agree that this is one of the worst blunders in sensational court history.

[@Starshine-1979]

or a desperate attempt at a mistrial

[@susanhewitt5602]

And it happened to the right guy 🤣 it pointed out some of his lies, so I call it poetic justice

[@nicolebrown1927]

Yep🤭

[@camaro02dk]

@@Starshine-1979 like the judge said.. attempt at mistrial for the 17th time

[@jonevers8027]

@Ricky M. No blunder. Just designed to create the exact motion being brought here. A Defence 'Hail Mary' no less.

[@PhirstPlays]

The Depp trial, The Jones Trial, several other recent high profile trials, really make a poor argument for the competency of high paid lawyers.

[@d5434]

Their Legal Assistant must have been fired for that mistake.

[@RaveYoda]

I've seen others argue that the Lawyer was trying to bring about a mistrial. I'd be amazed such a tactic would work, but, it's probably the only actual option he had given who his client is.

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

Same with Elizabeth Holmes' lawyer, if the system remotely worked right that guy would be in prison.

[@hayderimran7]

you have no idea about these "high profile" lawyers - all they want is big fish to milk money out while getting in to law schools through privilege. you should see how Amy Corey got into supreme court

[@tobiasskene10]

Imagine hiring this lawyer, I’d want a refund. The judge trying not to laugh is priceless

[@codent]

Jones's 11th lawyer for this case...

[@alg5534]

@YME How so, explain

[@Ralphie5023]

You only pay for what you need

[@afyaabrafi5433]

@@Ralphie5023 😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣 Where's Emu when I need him? You got me rolling!!! Thanks very much! 🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾

[@alg5534]

I'm sure the lawyer's staff is at fault, but he is ultimately responsible for what is shared. Almost seems it was deliberately sent by one of his staff members to help bury Alex Jones.

[@PronatorTendon]

It must be difficult to sit through such an eviscerating deconstruction of your legal practice

[@johnc3673]

100% correct. That’s a FU of gargantuan scope unlikely to be topped.

[@kkeelty64]

And yet... my sympathy is at a zero. No objection raised during the use of this material at AJ's cross exam, didn't follow the rule. BOOM

[@valeciareynolds4847]

Looks like defense attorney is now fighting that long vacation that is in his future why didn't he object when his client was asked about it on the stand little to late now

[@QuiltLady]

Jones would have been better off complying with the laws. Because he failed to comply refusing to show for court and failing to supply discovery information, in Texas, you get this trial. He had his chance. But either way, his arrogance and lies and his millions won’t save him. Now the government will have access to his phone records. That and the fact is that he is guilty. Same thing will happen to Fox entertainment.

[@sstrykert]

@@valeciareynolds4847 the BAR F@CKS both parties, all spectrums. Dr King to Malcom X. Their role is to create barriers so the "little people" of all ilks can not rise

[@Elegant_Sausage]

Any lawyer that messes up this badly needs to be reviewed. Doesn't matter which side they are on. It's a level of incompetence that should be penalized.

[@tioswift3676]

It was by design

[@hawkeye681]

That’s why lawyers pay for legal malpractice insurance.

[@juneaskew6871]

I agree with you he should be investigated for misconduct. I don't think this was a mistake. They did it to get a mistrial. These attorneys have done this successfully in other cases for Jones.

[@h00k57]

There are going to be multiple sanctions against that attorney after the trial ends. Btw no one would purposely give someone's full phone data for 2 years to the opposition, anyone thinking that is a lemming

[@jamestownsassacre9211]

Another instance of terrible judgement on Jones' part. The level of self destruction over these past few years is astounding.

[@englishish]

As someone with absolutely zero formal experience with law, this motion sounds essentially like "due to my failure to properly do my job as a lawyer, this should be a mistrial". Can anyone with a legal background let me know whether or not this is accurate?

[@alyssab007]

I only have a legal undergrad degree and work as a paralegal but I completely agree!

[@andrewdobson8282]

“The judge was correct. If a defendant's attorney could get a mistrial by purposefully or accidentally sending his attorney-client notes to the opposing attorney, there could never be a guilty verdict.”

[@Manx36]

The fact that they are asking for a mistrial says to me it was done on purpose so that they could try to get a mistrial

[@skaetur1]

He fails to prove his statement: we asked them to delete the things they were not supposed to have. He is lying.

[@JudyFayLondon]

Seems so.

[@veritypickle8471]

Considering that the parties who've read the communications all say something along the lines of "wait until law enforcement gets hold of this", I'd strongly doubt it was sent on purpose. I'd wager that it was sent accidentally, then they decided the way to profit from the mistake might be to cry mistrial if the trial went particularly badly for them, which it did.

[@beverleykeller5950]

Becsuse this judge is corrupt! Nazie wanna be! They should get another court and judge because of this rotten liberal judge!!

[@Orion-yd4dy]

Mistrials are granted when the other side screws up so much it’s unfair, not when your own side screws up. How they thought that the judge would grant it is beyond ludicrous.

[@MrMvidz]

Jones lawyer should be embarrassed, making that mistake and then failing to do anything about it within 10 days. A bit rich to ask for a mistrial when you are the culprit.

[@Elegant_Sausage]

He should be more than embarrassed. It's unacceptable. He needs to have his license reviewed, or something. Anything.

[@mepulley7913]

Not that I'm defending him, but he has to "earn" those fees now.

[@SeeHang]

good to see people would perfer the prosecutor to proceed with full force against jones and his lawyer but i doubt people in the comment section would appreciate that code of conduct being brought onto their judgement. i see a whole lot of hypocrites with popcorn watching this trial

[@Lokahi-fo-life]

I think he did it on purpose hoping they would use it and then call for a mistrial. He also accused the plaintiff’s attorneys for doing it to get a mistrial, when really how would that help the plaintiff. I think he thinks he was being smart and he’s really not. I think there’s a press conference at the Four Seasons Landscaping Co. 😂

[@bruceernst7162]

Malfeasance for sure!

[@daemoncan2364]

"We want the cellphone records thrown out. Yes, the same same cellphone records that Mr. Jones said do not exist"

[@smeff099]

Revisionist history, he said he couldn't find them, not that they didn't exist.

[@robertluong3024]

@@smeff099 "revisionist" history, it's called a mistake ... relax

[@mervcharles8365]

@@smeff099 no he literally said they don’t exist and he checked himself.. also said he hasn’t sent emails in over a decade

[@LanceThompsonKssooner]

@@mervcharles8365 didn't he also say that he turned over his entire phone as well? It seemed he had no idea what the attorney was asking...since he didn't know his team had "mistakenly" turned over ever communication they had ever had. His answer would have been relevant to what was known to him and concerning information that was public. It's ridiculous that people can't just be honest about this case.

[@lunapasquale]

So no privacy is what you believe in

[@DaRadicalCavy]

God that lawyer wining and the end just throwing out dying pleas to limit damage is just pathetic. Been in a lot of courtrooms and not once seen such an awful legal arguments

[@TheAurelianProject]

@bouytt guyt Ok, bot

[@User0000000000000004]

the word is whining.

[@PatriotGamesROCKS]

"Can I have a mistrial based on the fact I am a terrible lawyer"? lol

[@skaetur1]

I like how the other attorney laid it all out yesterday so this is all fraud today.

[@blitzrule]

😂👍

[@wendymarie7151]

🤣🤣🤣 good one!! Lmao 😂😂😂

[@hawkeye681]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤓🤓😏

[@SSintox]

Next breaking news: Alex Jones fires his attorney, demands a mistrial because his attorney's send "by mistake" "without" his consent sending to opposing party evidence against him. You can't make write a better script with these losers.

[@TeaSpiracy]

This Lawyer will forever be the dude who sent the file that doomed his client

[@jeffmisch1485]

he was plenty doomed before. just icing for the cake.

[@constancedean8047]

His client was already doomed.

[@melissamoore1648]

He has been doomed several times over, at this point.

[@georhodiumgeo9827]

The trial was already concluded and he was found guilty, this is just about the amount he will pay. I think this moves the ruling from $50 million to the full $147 million they requested. Furthermore these documents will be available for anyone else that wants to make a claim against jones and the jan 6 committee. This might lead to bigger fish.

[@bayareaartist999]

or he did what the law required and protected his license.

[@donstack4011]

“What is this, like the 17th time you’ve asked for a mistrial?” Love it. As a lawyer, I can tell you that you only ask for a mistrial when you know you’re in big big trouble

[@idc0459]

Never do it when stuff is actually f-ed up. Nope. Only when you're in trouble. For sure dude. Totally......

[@joshuaedwards3322]

"As a lawyer?" Lol

[@SofaKingwetodded93]

Well I’m also a lawyer and I also agree

[@abelis644]

@@joshuaedwards3322 You do know people are lawyers, doctors, nurses, cops etc It IS a profession, there ARE thousands of them out there, 2 on my own street. Just because you didn't go to school past grade 8 doesn't mean that the rest of us didn't either.

[@joshuaedwards3322]

@@SofaKingwetodded93 and Im also a client... lol

[@user-qx2ml4qy6y]

Gamble’s reaction to this whole thing is just chef’s kiss. “Okay, just review all 300gb worth of information by the end of the day and let’s see what we can do because you had a long time to figure this out when you were suppose to do this”

[@Montesama314]

If a mistake by your own hand could be used as the basis for a mistrial, then there would never be a trial because any losing party could just go "oops, I sent this document" on purpose and shut everything down. No judge in their right mind would allow for that sabotage of the civil court process.

[@asangamanoj]

I know few people said the same but you did good by simplyfing it for everybody , I think you should get more likes.

[@nANa-bq8xm]

Yeah sure... but not if he was asked not to view it and did it anyway in court. What country are you from Russia?

[@justsomeguy6474]

@@nANa-bq8xm Your tears are delicious.

[@williammasters3545]

that is the reason the receiving lawyer should have sent it back !

[@TheDivegeek]

@@nANa-bq8xm there's a specific process that should have been followed to address inadvertent discovery. It wasn't followed.

[@USERNAMEfieldempty]

Judge : ''Who's asked you to turn over this information?'' Prosecuting Lawyer : ''The January 6th Committee'' Judge to Jones's Lawyer : ''I mean... I don't know that you get to stop that anyways.'' An orgasmic moment.

[@mikehathaway3659]

Judge with poker face, holding back the smiles with that one.

[@mischa.brownx]

An orgasmic moment when your big nothing burger "Jan 6" turns the same results as Russia Russia Russia and all others: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. You blue anon cultists really need to get mental help and come back to reality.

[@robertbrown6879]

I love how all these people that hate this country congregate.

[@mezirezi1]

That part was funny, because if Jones don't want to release them to the Jan 6, the prosecutor will do under the provision cited.😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@USERNAMEfieldempty]

@@robertbrown6879 you aren't making any sense with that comment.

[@Lokahi-fo-life]

You know the plaintiff’s attorneys did their homework before they introduced it into evidence.

[@futurereflections4097]

He’s good. No denying that.

[@anthonybyrnes2561]

A gamble that his follow up conduct ensured would fail.

[@denasewell]

Yeah burn the witch and his attorney!

[@paulleverton9569]

@@anthonybyrnes2561 What do you mean?

[@codyschnuriger6743]

They were told to disregard the link as it was for the Connecticut lawsuit and violated attorney client privilege.

[@Junkman2008]

Karma slipped into bed with Alex Jones and whispered in his ear.... *"You're f**ked."* 😅

[@johnhud2536]

It’s one thing to accidentally send damaging information to the opposing counsel. Quite another to not invoke the 10 day rule 193.3 to prevent use of material at trial

[@skyborso4158]

Especially when 193.3 was done prior. Just complete lazy incompetence

[@lourendo01]

The plaintiffs attorney emailed defendant claiming that they did not download his hard drive yet. It wasn't until yesterday that they revealed that they actually had a copy of the attorneys emails and hard drive.

[@TT-qo9dv]

@@lourendo01 wang dang 👍

[@pdcdesign9632]

@@skyborso4158 Lionel Hutz was a more competent "lawyer". 😂😂

[@trojanhell7639]

Not really damaging info … it was text message that is out of context

[@PurpleChevron]

Remember when we all thought Amber Heard's lawyers were bad? lol! This is incompetence on an absolutely epic scale.

[@sassysarina9718]

Yesssss

[@dorothymiddaugh6234]

Have to agree, this is terrible on both sides and judge.

[@pdcdesign9632]

Lionel Hutz was a more competent "lawyer". 😂😂

[@4h204x4]

I'm starting to think this happens all the time, we just don't hear about it.

[@ditzygypsy]

@@dorothymiddaugh6234 No. The defence is absurdly incompetent. This judge is terrific and the Plaintiff’s attorneys are doing a fantastic job.

[@parrishsells0116]

That he tries to blame plaintiff attorney for his screw up is laughable at a minimum.

[@dostoyevesky12]

Actually not a bad argument. If in possesion of improperly sent material and the other attorney admitted it was, he has a duty to turn it back over. The other attorney should have looked through it first and if he found any relevant stuff he could have gone after Jone's attorney for not turning over all relevant info.

[@tioswift3676]

@@dostoyevesky12 corrext

[@totallylooney8292]

​@@dostoyevesky12 Bankston told him. He had 10 days to do anything about it. he didn't.

[@parrishsells0116]

@@dostoyevesky12 That is where the 10 days comes in. That is why it is laughable. He (jones atty) allowed the 10 days to lapse w/out disputing his error and now that it has blown in his face he is trying to lay blame where it doesn't belong.

[@MrAlehkra]

@@dostoyevesky12 No, no he does not. He has a duty to inform opposing counsel of the mistake, which he did. He would then have a duty to turn back over anything that the opposition went through and properly marked as confidential as per the actual written procedural rules. Which they did not do.

[@atheosaurus4116]

Hands down, the last 30 seconds are the best! 😂 📸

[@MusicByJC]

I love how he threw out the part about text messages between Jones and Stone. In other words, Jan. 6th committee, we have some text messages you might want to see.

[@byrnemeister2008]

The subpoena is already in from the sound of it. That was a hilarious throwaway. LOL what a screwup.

[@Zombied77]

Ah yes the OTHER witch hunt

[@nevelis]

Hahahaha so good

[@k.bryant8174]

Alex is probably using one of Roger's lawyers now. This looked like something out of a SNL skit.

[@lauriemyers3]

Kids…this is an example of how NOT to practice law. It’s like big brother telling mom that little brother was the one that broke the window.

[@davidarnold344]

The judge isn't following law either.

[@lisawesley7132]

@@davidarnold344 Really? Please be specific how she is not following TEXAS LAW.

[@zencooking6983]

The only issue is that AJ can blame his lawyer on appeal.

[@olddognewtricks9694]

The paralegal sending the link by accident is understandable but the lawyer not immediately doing everything he can to prevent publishing them is indefensible. If there was ANY questions regarding 10 days then he should have sent 500 emails within that time.

[@tomhefner6344]

I wonder if maybe the release of the texts were on purpose.

[@redsocks771]

_"The paralegal sending the link by accident is understandable"_ HUH? There is no way in a Trial of this magnitude to excuse what happened. Alex Jones should seek new counsel immediately. I am sure Mr. Jones is spending hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars for competent counsel. This rookie, bush league mistake is unacceptable.

[@jamesappling1212]

Just a scheme to get a mistrial by crying Privileged Information!

[@ilsl04]

His lawyer was probably drunk and forgot

[@racheldavila6431]

Exactly 😍💯💯💯💯

[@Marcus1074]

I went back and saw again the clip were the lawyer brings to Jones attention the "unintentional" disclosure. It's worth watching the defense lawyer reaction (which is null). Makes me think it was designed to throw the plaintiff into a last minute scavenger hunt, and hopefully if they use anything that can be considered as confidential, file for mistrial

[@mattt9187]

Your honor, it is unfair the plaintiffs attorney caught us lying again and he did it by using the discovery we claimed we did not have. 🤯

[@susanbengston3208]

🤣

[@christinearmington]

👍

[@moisesperez4605]

Oh my god that’s so funny

[@bill8605]

LOL, that sums it up . Good one.

[@AfroDeesiac]

"Your Honor, can I have 10 days from yesterday to review the stuff that I was supposed to review 12 months ago?"

[@gurkagurkadurka6688]

Isn't that a lot like asking for a mistrial because you accidentally admitted to a crime you committed?

[@qwadratix]

It's EXACTLY like...

[@hopefletcher7420]

A friend of mine was mugged and the police caught thentwo men. At the trial my friend was on the stand and was asked "Are the men who attached in the courtroom today?. The two defendants raised their hands.

[@sukikom2259]

🤣😂🤣😂😅

[@gurkagurkadurka6688]

@@hopefletcher7420 LMFAO. You're lying. Tell me you're lying. 😆

[@ysf-psfx]

@@hopefletcher7420 "No further questions" xD

[@leebehl3063]

Props to the Judge for keeping a straight face when the defense is pretty much saying, its not fair that the prosecution got the evidence that my client lied

[@robertbrown6879]

When did the defense attorney say they got evidence that my client lied. Since you know, about what? And point it out don't make sweeping comments without detail to back your claims.

[@Gush27]

@@robertbrown6879 Jones claimed he had no texts from the last two years about Sandy Hook. The defense accidentally sent his phone to the prosecution, which found that he did. That is a lie. Not that hard.

[@daniellee9763]

@@robertbrown6879 The prosecution said Jones lied. loser

[@jasonbolding3481]

@@robertbrown6879 you mean like the text messages and emails that under oath was said not to exist?

[@jojomakes]

@@robertbrown6879 Is this a serious question?

[@georgefulton8152]

This judge is exceptionally smart and a great communicator. I listened closely, in another clip, to her questioning Alex Jones in a series of questions which can only be defined as logical perfection in which there wasn’t ANY daylight for Jones to wiggle out. I mean no wonder she’s a judge, she’s obviously an incredibly gifted attorney. And through all of this with a lying, twisted and angry Jones, with pictures of her on fire, ignoring rules of courts, ignoring and lying about discovery, perjury and more, she has yet to lose her cool. Not to mention frivolous and incompetent motions on the part of defense. She’s actually amazing.

[@zerocool1884]

Since when is it the judge's job to question a plaintiff or defendant?

[@user-ot4ch4qh9c]

@@zerocool1884 obvious mistrial, judge show bias against the defense

[@brianking9215]

Yeah, but she's a judge now not an attorney...

[@timmckeown1313]

@@zerocool1884 that is not unusual at all at a trial if the judge needs clarification from a witness…particularly from one as deceptive and shady as Alex Jones.

[@lets_go_brandon2]

Kool aid much?

[@whiteraven69]

Why didnt the attorney file a confidentiality motion within the 10 days? And Now they are using their error to play the”victim”…

[@qwadratix]

Because they didn't realize their mistake before it was revealed in court.

[@MamaBlisss]

That was my thought. He said it was immediately recognized as a mistake. At first I thought defense was nervous but I was wrong lol. I can't say I've ever witnessed such incompetence and the spinning isn't working 😕

[@deecal1021]

Million dollar question.

[@brinx8634]

Why? Incompetence. 🐒

[@robfer5370]

@@qwadratix Oh yeah how convenient and also just so happens to be grounds for a mistrial hmmm 🤔

[@gerretoutdoors3710]

Mark Bankston just moved up from epic lawyer to top tier lawyer. He is absolutely wrecking the defense.

[@Rubyclaygirl]

That defense attorney's gonna be great in traffic court

[@Walawalacookie]

He is 100% a Giga-Chad at this point. I have a lot of respect for the man.

[@johngoodman9380]

The look and gesture Mark Bankston gave the defense attorney as they turn to leave was priceless.

[@KayBee659]

I cannot wait to hear what Mark Bankston has to say about this on Knowledge Fight!!

[@TangoNevada]

Totally agree he is being Epic. Also, I have to admit this case is probably well below his normal level. It's like an NFL player playing Highschool football. If you listen to him discuss any of the deposition he constantly talks about how easily everyone walked into the traps he laid out, as if they didn't even know traps were allowed. It's pretty hilarious, because most of them showed up like they were going to stonewall him and come out looking good. By the end, they were whimper puppies with their tail tucked between their legs.

[@matthias2756]

The lawyer asking for 9 extra days to redact is hilarious! It’s like when I’d ask for extra time to do my homework that was due a month prior in primary school

[@numus19]

More like asking for extra time to do your homework after the school year is already over.

[@danielroque8504]

Unfortunately, you and I are not privileged! This fools seem to catch every break possible!

[@justsayin3600]

Now we all understand how he made it through school.

[@brainfreeze44131]

I don't think he wanted the extra days for this trial. I think he was looking down the road to another trial that was mentioned about sharing information and for the Jan. 6 committee. She should have asked for a copy of the files to be preserved on a court server. I wouldn't be surprised if the law offices weren't broken into and the server destroyed or hacked and the hard drive wiped clean. I would have a backup taken of the server and that backup taken offsite.

[@matthias2756]

@@brainfreeze44131 I wasn’t making that claim 😅 read my comment again

[@suzygreen2612]

Jones' lawyer is the gift that keeps on giving.😂

[@mikeestvanik]

The way the plaintiffs lawyer just grins ear to ear when they get up and leave made my day. Pure joy on that man's face

[@cult_of_odin]

The ambulance chaser you mean.

[@DrummerJacob]

@@cult_of_odin do you always try to tell people what they mean as a passive aggressive way of you communicating your little feelings? You could just say what you think like a big boy...but I don't want to put too much pressure on you. Baby steps.

[@jimmyneal1988]

The judge is supposed to remain unbiased! This woman should be disbarred immediately!

[@djjones7226]

@@jimmyneal1988 *yawn🙄

[@TheUnlocked]

@@jimmyneal1988 To ignore the abominable behavior of the defense would be to show bias in their favor.

[@scottmatthews6889]

Basically “we accidentally sent you evidence that proves our client is lying and guilty “

[@bobbyray5165]

What this reads like is a Hail Mary to force a mistrial.

[@Kyle_Schaff]

And the classic argument “This is all being done for the cameras” lmao

[@killersalmon4359]

Not just that - it was "we accidentally sent you evidence that proves our client is lying and guilty which we should have sent a year ago anyway to opposing counsel."

[@smilinwolfette1978]

And also reads, Alex jones played a huge part in the Jan 6. Riots! Lol

[@magicianman1345]

They can't use that evidence though

[@EricOhlsen_Aventura]

Holly smokes. I could only imagine how the defense council feels being tore up like that for 10 minutes Basically invalidating your whole law career and possibly anything you might’ve learned in law school. Wow.

[@borodel619]

Hi Eric, I am a medical doctor, and almost everything I learned in Medical schools I had to reject, by coming out of coma or they call to awaken.

[@mikemike6221]

That is because most attorneys are idiots, my friend. A few of us are the rare exception.

[@EricOhlsen_Aventura]

@@borodel619 for sure. My wife says the same thing about Law School, and that prior life experiences dictated her career path. Either way this courtroom clip was brutal and reminds me of when I try to argue with my her.

[@brianrizzi6321]

Lawyer getting what he deserves for defending this piece of crap

[@blixten2928]

@@brianrizzi6321 As sleazy as his client.

[@TheBoboMaker]

The plaintiff's lawyer is brutal🤣🤣🤣

[@drobinson3999]

I am sure the DOJ would be interested to get the texts Alex Jones sent to everyone regarding the Jan 6th issue

[@starsarenumber1]

I'd bet they already have that information in their possession. I'm surprised we haven't already heard of any subpoenas being sent from the J6 Committee.

[@Jesus_Christ_is_Lord_]

Doubt it, besides Jan 6th isn't the worse thing in the world one person died. But Democrats make it out that it's worse than 9/11

[@kimberlynroberts7059]

They're on it.

[@joseduarte6729]

Jan 6 was planned by the left

[@latentsea]

Oh please, Alex is peaceful. And they already had them on January 7th.

[@FaerieLife]

My mind is BLOWN by how this "personal injury" attorney has completely out-lawyered Mr Jones's "big-league" attorney... RESPECT👏👏👏

[@michael_c2]

Attorney Lionel Hutz

[@towel-ie7554]

In an unwinnable case, even a great lawyer can get grilled.

[@thinkerly1]

The "big-league" attorney out-lawyered himself.

[@towel-ie7554]

@@thinkerly1 eh, still gets paid. Probably knew Jones was toast, took a nice retainer, wait til the ruling comes down and Jones declares bankruptcy, then walks away with a nice payday.

[@mgbreis8506]

@@towel-ie7554 That would be an admirable game plan if it weren't for the enormous malpractice claim he just created vis-a-vis his incompetence. He's in deep water now.

[@DawnRGenX]

He should be sanctioned for even asking. He's been aiming for a mistrial the entire time. I'd be very suspicious of his conduct.

[@JohnnyMJiron]

@an-n welp, good sign you all have nothing left when you sink to petty insults. Sorry your messiah mislead you.

[@brettrun8575]

@an-n not only did he screw up and accidentally send all the files to the prosecutor, he then failed or was too lazy to seek protection of these files as privileged information. Pure incompetence.

[@numus19]

At least . Probably 17 times now according to the judge

[@johnbobbypringle]

@an-n She messed up my mcdonalds order too so I'm not surprised she has no job

[@CyberBrySkyNet]

What

[@danielleyeap]

11:44 "Mr Jones intimate messages with Roger Stone" 🤣😂🤣 Bankston 🔥🔥😂

[@carnyzack]

"No you hang up first!"

[@joelwillis2043]

Alex Jones' lawyer has the same intelligence as his audience.

[@nicolebrown1927]

I concur wholeheartedly!🤣

[@seraphinaaizen6278]

@@dwc7325 Yeah, maybe. At the very least, this guy had the brainpower to get through law school. And.....school in general. Which is kind of beyond the average Alex Jones fan.

[@ladyliberty]

He just got a mistrial and bought a few more years...bots are the only comments allowed. We love you Alex!!

[@joelwillis2043]

@@ladyliberty You should learn to read. He requested a mistrial and the judge told him to sit down and shut up.

[@ladyliberty]

@@joelwillis2043 it's not up to her...you should know that

[@darealbullet]

He didn’t object when the attorney mentioned it he just sunk in his seat scratching his head😂😂

[@SDon-wn8xb]

The defense attorneys don't even appear to have an inventory of all the information they sent the prosecuting attorneys. Looks to me like the defense tried the old lawyer trick or dumping massive amounts of information, in order to overwhelm the prosecution, and it backfired spectacularly!

[@hydrocarbon82]

Rule #1 of last minute dumps: make sure you know what's in it before sending it! lol

[@Bible.Thumper]

That dog doesn’t hunt. It’s not like AJ was poor and using a pro Bono or percentage law firm. Not reviewing evidence sent, not acting to get it removed, and then denying facts revealed in that evidence is surely beyond “failure” and heading towards sabotage.

[@scottt7009]

What prosecution? This isn't a criminal trial.

[@brumbyrider54]

it is not defense v prosecution, its defense v plaintiff . this is a civil trial.

[@jackt6595]

That trick worked when everything was on paper. All it takes is a simple keyword search to go through an infinite number of digital documents.

[@martian-sunset]

So-wait-he's saying that evidence he claimed did not exist (but really did, in fact, exist) was "mistakenly" sent to the plaintiff attorney..so it should be treated as if it didn't exist....? lol

[@armchairexpert4151]

The defence and AJ made sworn statement that those evidence did not exists during discovery. However through this accidental disclosure of document after those sworn statement made, the plaintiff found evidence that defence and AJ lied under oath.

[@snapit420]

Wasn’t this motion filed by a “crisis lawyer”?

[@Bbjaz824]

😂

[@shawn6669]

Pizza Phone Gate

[@shawn6669]

...person, woman, man, camera, tv....

[@tonyagibson7986]

Slow clap. You are the winner of the internet today. 💕

[@kcrknp]

@Gary Miller you can say all the false things you want but when you’re sued you do have to answer questions. Such is justice.

[@redwoods7370]

Alex Jones’ lawyer would make me shake in my shoes if I were Alex Jones. One time my financial adviser accidentally emailed me a list with all the names, social security numbers, addresses and investment amounts of ALL his clients. I let him know what he had done and fired him in the same email. He said oh sorry he meant to email it to his secretary who had the same first name as me.

[@robertbrown6879]

But you didn't just run with it and use all that confidential information, did you? If you did you might be running afoul of many laws and face a bunch of lawsuits. Kind of like the plaintiff's attorney. Wouldn't you think? In this day and age when unbelievable amounts of information can be contained on computers and links, it's not unusual. Happens all the time.

[@nANa-bq8xm]

So did you use all the information you found? Why not? It's OK when they do it though.

[@JJKoester]

His secretary was named Redwoods too?

[@daniellee9763]

@@nANa-bq8xm so many butt hurt Alex Jones losers in the chat.

[@tonisumblin2719]

You shredded the info right?

[@seaoftranquility7228]

I knew it was going to be something like this. Jones’ lawyer was objecting every step of the way, but when the prosecution revealed that he had received the emails by accident he was completely silent. It was a pretty clumsy attempt at a trap and I’m glad the judge didn’t fall for it but I suspect it’s not the last we’re going to hear about it.

[@wanicamcneil9859]

Yeah, you don’t have a good defense, move for a mistrial. And she said he had tried for serval mistrial before, serval times. I do know if it’s joke, but she said it was 17.

[@tmseh]

Like accidentally texting you sext to the "real" girlfriend.

[@peterford9369]

Yeah, seems all Jones's gang can do is go after a mistrial. He's such a showboat, he hangs himself.

[@torontolarrivee7965]

I didn’t quite conclude from this that the leak was intentional as a predicate for a mistrial. Jones’ lawyer was I think simply stunned and didn’t know how to object. The text shared in the court yesterday was not remotely privileged. Also, this attempt at a mistrial was so far fetched that the judge more or less asked if he was joking.

[@MrOoglebog]

I think you're giving him too much credit. The emails had information he was supposed to already have handed over. It made him look really bad. There's pretty much no way it could help his client. Asking for mistrial was a last ditch effort.

[@Deafpeaches]

So, the defense attorney's office screwed up as well as being lazy and not responding promptly to the plaintiff's question regarding the materials. The only opportunity I see for Mr. Jones is to sue his own attorney for incompetence and the judge (as she did) exclude the medical records from being able to be presented.

[@wmbtech]

He can't. His complaint would amount to "My lawyers failed to properly help me coverup my perjury and hide evidence." The substance of the damage is that his texts are public, the same ones that were ordered public. The complaint is that he wanted to illegally hide them. Jones loses all rights to blame his representation when he's caught conspiring with them criminally.

[@garrybarry4286]

This defence lawyer went to the same clown school of lawyers as Amber Heard's team. In both cases you get the defence you deserve, not what you need.

[@karenwhinesmore9347]

Lmfao I was thinking the same thing

[@merlinfalcon8518]

Some things are just plain indefensible.

[@alexandercahoulan6583]

I couldnt agree more. What a joke of a defense. Jones's lawyer , like Heards lawyer, was in WAY over his head. Jones seems too crazy to notice

[@snoot4873]

Lmao I said the same thing

[@timbutler3213]

Defense is spelled with an s not a c. Just sayin

[@seraphinaaizen6278]

I had a feeling that this guy's practice is going to collapse after this trial, because a) in addition to showing himself to be an immoral slimeball, he's got some serious malpractice going on here. Not just on the attorney-client privilege side of things, but it also seems like he attempted to violate discovery rules by not handing over certain things he should have.

[@firewizzard86]

He handed over everything and he has openly announced his financials. CAN YOU SAY WITCH HUNT?

[@JamesBoddie]

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. Hanlon's razor.

[@papig619]

Alex jones slime ball? Where u been the last 10 years this dudes an American hero. Stop watching cnn genius

[@dyjaun94]

@@papig619 I truly hope this is trolling/sarcasm lol

[@mera8785]

Yeah, he HAD to be paid a massive amount to be willing to torpedo his whole career like this. Whoever wanted to nail AJ was willing to spend the big bucks to do it.

[@ericgranberg8893]

This probably did start out as a mistake, but now it is so obviously a plan by the defense to get a mistrial.

[@machucast]

Nope, they did it as bait, hoping the plaintiffs would use it in court and then demand a miss trial because they sent an email back saying "disregard". Thankfully for us, and the entire world, there are procedures and steps that have to be taken beyond that, which the defendants never bothered doing, or where just to inept to be educated in, regardless, they literally shot themselves in the foot.

[@tomarmstrong4761]

Or to totally destroy their client in the "court of public opinion."

[@tomnealon1030]

@@tomarmstrong4761 That would be cause for disbarment. I seriously doubt he would sacrifice his career to "destroy their client in the court of public opinion".

[@justindion4394]

Jones is probably terrified of the Jan 6 committee and would oppose that to no end. There is no way that would be in the client's best interest.

[@mikee5507]

AT THIS POINT WHO CARES? THE JUDGE DECLARED HIM GUILTY. DO YOU GET IT? DO YOU KNOW HOW THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IS SUPPOSED TO WORK IN AMERICA? ARE YOU AWARE OF WHY THIS IS A PROBLEM?

[@DjZephy]

1:10 that "good morning" exchange felt so miserable lol

[@olm4700]

Maybe his intention was to make it seem as a "mistake" and that way ALL the information gets disqualified as "confidential and then ask for mistrial. Genius? I think not. The judge saw through the charade.

[@susanbengston3208]

Yea, they had only already tried the same thing 17 times before, in this same Case. Sad.

[@outdoorswalker3744]

Almost as good an idea as Jan 6th.

[@NotSureIfSrs_x]

Might still work, he will probably appeal due to ineffective counsel. He does have a fair shot there, he dun goofed real hard here.

[@christianschulz1443]

i mean it gives ground for a misstrial this is a level of malpractice that clearly violated the rights of Alex Jones

[@Chris_Picklepants]

@@christianschulz1443 LOL LOL LOL LOL - nope.

[@TracyA123]

I love how the Plaintiffs attorney asked the Judge if the live stream was working because "Law Enforcement agencies are watching". Alex is going to jail for perjury.

[@echo-channel77]

So of course you're okay with sending your political rivals to jail, you'd have fit right in 100 years ago with you hand outstreched yelling "Heil!" or a few hundred km east screaming "Stalin, Da!" Holocaust, Holodomor, who cares right? So long as the people you disaggre with "disappear" you're all for it...yes?

[@TracyA123]

@@echo-channel77 LOL .... Lemme guess.... You're a simpleton, right? Lmao😂

[@shilohivy4590]

🤞🏻

[@mssusanmarie]

Oh, I hope so.

[@mralexsosa]

Not just for perjury. I think that was more to do with Jan 6th investigation.

[@wmbtech]

The SASS. "Well they're gonna now!" and "I don't know if you were serious ... This is like the seventeenth time..." She is visibly tired of the defense's BS, and I'm here for it.

[@jimmyneal1988]

She's obviously highly biased and is not fit for the bench!

[@phoenixheart79]

@@jimmyneal1988 I mean, she's been given irrefutable evidence that Jones lied to her, repeatedly. That his legal team have tried to disrupt the case, repeatedly. That his team were not going to hand over evidence they were required to hand over, only doing so inadvertently. She has every right to be frustrated with both Jones and his team - and she is far, far from the first judge to let their displeasure with one party or the other be known.

[@carriehazel77]

@@jimmyneal1988 stop drinking the Kool aid

[@michaelboyle5805]

@@jimmyneal1988 sarcasm Well done, good to see some wit

[@SiloSoundStudios]

@@jimmyneal1988 try harder troll

[@ropo8049]

Love it how Plaintiff's lead attorney Mark Bankston gives that big grin to Alex Jones' attorney F. Andino Reynal at end of the hearing! 😁

[@Dwealdric]

Photographer: "My camera is on silent your honour" Judge: "That's impossible. "Silent" can't be that loud." This judge is a gem.

[@jsusna1972]

I stayed to the end also to see what she was going to say to the lady with the camera. Too funny!

[@AWSVids]

She might be right too. DSLRs like that have a mirror that sends the image up to the viewfinder. This mirror flips up when taking the picture, and that's the big clicking sound you tend to hear. It's not the shutter. The mirror stays up if you use the digital screen to view your frame instead of the viewfinder, by switching it to screen mode instead of viewfinder mode. The picture-taking is much more quiet that way. At least, that's how it is on the ones I've used. I don't know if hers is exactly the same, but she might just not know about that trick to make it quieter.

[@lisawesley7132]

The judge is right. That camera 📷 is loud as H* LL. I wished that they showed the end with the camera lady.

[@lisawesley7132]

@@AWSVids I wish you were there to help her . 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💯

[@ccplant]

Silent mode is to prevent the beep the camera makes during the autofocus. But DSLRs are still loud due to the mirror snapping up and down. Photographer needs to invest in a mirrorless camera.

[@coma13794]

Not being a legal person, I hear the presentation of the motion and think to myself, "seems a bit loosey goosey....but I guess I can see the point." I am then thoroughly entertained for the next 15 minutes hearing that argument just being ripped into a trillion pieces. Someone's career is over, SURELY.

[@anthonymordawski6529]

I would be looking too change my name and plastic surgery l

[@o.hernandez784]

James Corden took that motion for mistrial down quick.

[@Cavc8g]

@@o.hernandez784 glad to see he’s expanding his portfolio 😂

[@zgarrett14]

I don't think it was "accidentally " shared.

[@classicalaid1]

@@anthonymordawski6529 Lets not forget gender modification, just for fun.

[@itsjustme8947]

Translation: "Your honor, we're suppressing evidence that was relevant to discovery. We want a mistrial!" Judge: "You had 10 days to get this done. Get f*cked!"

[@circuitguy9750]

No. Discovery can last years. They had *years* in front of the judge to debate this. They had ten days because they sent it out illegally late.

[@kerrynicholls6683]

It’s so much easier for the judge to say it that way.

[@cinemoriahFPV]

This is the only time I've seen Court proceedings that were more insane than Alex Jones video broadcast.

[@chrisoneill3999]

You can see how tired this judge is of the defense trying to game the justice system. This trial has been a charade: the entire Alex Jones defense team needs to be audited, and probably disbarred.

[@mariss.317]

Correct, this judge is tired of the justice system. Correct, this whole plaintiff team should be audited.

[@cyberbehikesanakori]

He found the only lawyers that would represent him.

[@dianeowen5258]

Open your eyes.

[@briarrose29]

Exactly!

[@firewizzard86]

@@cyberbehikesanakori scum bag leftists harassed his previous Lawyers.

[@willquek8782]

I knew this was a ploy by the defense!@ 99% sure he sent those purposely to try to taint the trial. AJ has done this before in another trial.

[@Jesus_Christ_is_Lord_]

What trial? Didn't know he was in another

[@aeneis116]

It was the prosecutors choice to admit the hidden evidence as evidence. If it was a trick the prosecutors used the info. even after acknowledging the receipt

[@esIworld]

You give him too much credit.

[@sterlingwinchell7207]

@@aeneis116 what prosecutor? This is a civil trial for money damages, not a criminal trial!

[@willwalker6894]

Don’t hate the player hate the game.

[@cypressbutane4575]

The good news for Alex is even if he is on the hook for millions and millions in damages, he can go online and say that it was all a hoax and the people in the trial were actors.

[@Rls_0523]

He already has...Despite being admonished against speaking about the trial.

[@poppapedro2363]

Already did, he said the judge was reading from a script and the jury are living in a bubble. It's during the plaintiff's cross examination of Alex

[@DianaCB_TX]

Well, having it filmed by HBO makes that claim pretty easy for him.

[@surelyyoujokemeinfailure7531]

Jones on his podcast: The judge is an alien reptile person sent by Satan! Jones in court the next day: It was just rhetorical hyperbole, your honor. I can't help it if one of my whackadoo followers tried to kill you based on my lies.

[@troubleondemand7703]

They're already doing that in this thread!

[@jainra]

It's like hitting reply-all on a company wide email...

[@davidwilcox3733]

It's not just that the info was sent by mistake. It's that he had 10 days to fix it and did nothing.

[@392redienhcs]

This law firm has just confirmed a breach of confidential information in public, for God knows which clients, what files, maybe all of them. This is a firm-closer of an event and their clients will be shaking in their boots, wondering if their dirty laundry is out there in the wild.

[@byrnemeister2008]

In particular as the world and dog are subpoenaing for it. 300GB is a lot of stuff.

[@alphaomega153]

Jones' lawyer: “Your Honor, we f**ked up, and it's the plaintiffs' attorney's fault. I rest my case.”

[@bruceernst7162]

OMG that is too funny!

[@Rhyas9]

"Mr Bankston?" "Sure!" Oh you know he's enjoying every moment of this.

[@kdaxir4731]

I knew they were going to do that. I wouldn't doubt it if releasing the records accidently, wasn't an accident so they could file for a mistrial.

[@IzzyMariel]

this is the most delusional take on the entire situation.

[@redkitten7046]

Yes it could have been a fishing expedition.

[@thiloreichelt4199]

If that really would have been the plan, that lawyer should be disbarred. If someone would try that, he would choose a document clearly falling under priviledge.

[@terrancekayton007]

Right, I think the lawyer right now is just going through the “motions” & making it look like he’s doing the best he can by rolling procedure, but he’s over this case and being associated with these lies, he’d rather be the guy that sent the text and got disbarred and sent Alex jones to jail for his incompetence…he’ll go down in history as the man who lost it all for Alex jones…oh well, the world will say…I’m sure he’s got enough monew and investments and opportunities that this gig can take a backseat

[@boogiewookie77]

It's sheer incompetence. Nothing more, nothing less.

[@thematrixoflife]

The first thing I thought yesterday was that the Jan. 6 committee was going to want those emails. And today, BAM! yup, sure enough.

[@dorothynelson8620]

So true, they're on it.

[@TheDazy37]

Sounds like the lawyer can legally share the texts with the Sandy Hook family and wouldn’t they just LOVE to give them to Jan 6 committee

[@jeffisaacson3804]

I wouldn't hire this guy to be my lawyer based on what I've been seeing; how he got his license to practice law is beyond me.

[@jeffmisch1485]

He's lucky,Wendy's is hiring. Paying $16 an hour.

[@wymple09]

He has practically nothing to work with, so there is that.

[@ashfield4313]

@@wymple09 assuming that's true for the sake of argument, it has nothing to do with such idiocy. All lawyers lie for their clients, it's what you pay them for as no one is usually clean on either side. The fact that this one did this to their client is a total breach in ethics if done intentionally and malpractice at the least otherwise.

[@tarnsand440]

And he was a Federal Prosecutor previously.

[@romanval69]

He's AJ's 11th lawyer, so he's already scraping the bottom of the barrel.

[@Tossona25]

I loved the smile the persecutor gave the defense attorney at the end. Priceless!

[@MrDee001]

This was definitely a ploy by the defense to create a situation that would cause a mistrial. They had no case and figured they create a technical issue and try to convince the judge.

[@taxiuniversum]

I disagree.

[@renagreat5510]

That was my first thought!

[@rogersmith7808]

@@taxiuniversum It just seems like too big of a blunder not to have been intentional. And not just the sending but he was notified and still did nothing to assert privilege. So he's either grossly incompetent or it was intentional.

[@jacksondrake-lost]

@@taxiuniversum Who cares... get ready though that's all you need to hear.

[@Gisiebob]

also I feel like there is an effort to convince alex jones audience it was a mistrial irrespective of the legal system

[@richardhayman4868]

I'm getting giddy just getting ready to watch this. Thank you, so much, Law&Crime Network for this coverage!!

[@mikegardens]

"You didn't tell me if you were REALLY trying to aim for a mistrial or if that was just a throw away... it's like the 17th time or something..." I love how the judge is putting defense on blast in the most chill way.

[@cgt0dd]

I have been a trial lawyer for over 20 years, and this is not only malpractice, but also should result in a charge against Jones for perjury given the content of the phone. I hope the defense counsel has already notified his malpractice carrier.

[@tcpratt1660]

The defense counsel's malpractice carrier's paralegals are already writing parody notices (distributed internally only) to him explaining, in painfully humorous detail, why his claim for malpractice is being terminated with extreme prejudice.

[@dragonf1092]

The judge, parents,and their attorney should be arrested, charged, and prosecuted under title 18 U.S.C. sections 241 conspiracy against rights and 242 deprivation of rights under color of law by violating Alex Jones 1st amendment constitutionally protected rights (liberties) freedom of speech,if Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech,then the justice department (courts) cannot legally charge or force anyone to pay anyone anything for something they said. The court is bound under the constitution of the united states of America. The judge and attorney should be charged and prosecuted under title 5 U.S.C. sections 3331,3333,7311 perjury in violating oath of office which is treason and a felony for violating Alex Jones constitutionally protected rights (liberties) which is treason and a felony under state and federal law. U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice, Freedom of speech.

[@dragonf1092]

@@Fee.1 the judge should be disbarred and prosecuted.

[@dragonf1092]

The attorney of the parents should be disbarred for treason, perjury in violating oath of office. This case should have been thrown out of court. U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice, Freedom of speech.

[@ct5625]

The judge isn't buying a moment of this, nor should she. The only people hoping for a mistrial is Alex Jones' team. This is such a ludicrous play I genuinely think his legal team should be entirely disbarred and never permitted to practice law in any state.

[@argentiskyblau159]

Irregardless, it falls on the lawyers and it should be a mistrial.

[@ubuu7]

LIES! This is the most elite legal team in the world, trained by the greatest lawyer of all time, Rudy Giuliani.

[@user-iw4gz7vh4w]

Disbarred for what?

[@Beyblade_worrior]

Alex did nothing wrong

[@samgreason4449]

AJ is trying to get a mistrial by publicly talking about the judge, superimposing fire over her face, and then she needed to rule on that evidence. It's a neat trick. Not sure if it's been done before. Probably has though. Hopefully there is legal precedent for this and it doesn't impact the monetary award.

[@j.thomasgough4284]

It doesn’t sound like an error. It sounds like Jone’s attorney is simply trying to plug up the works and shoot for a mistrial because derailing this before the penalty phase completes is all they’ve got and Jone’s has a narcissist’s respect for the judicial system.

[@anthonycudahy7207]

Good point.

[@dannibble]

Yeah that's what I was thinking. The defense is literally playing games and trying whatever they can to get a mistrial. This is why the judge is so short with Jones is she knows the game.

[@jonevers8027]

@J. Thomas Gough. Exactly!! On the Nose! It doesn't just "sound like it", It's exactly what the defence was planning do when they deliberately sent that information. The last ditch of The Last Ditch defence ploys.

[@GwenArlene8181]

Sorry, give me a break! Who'd want the world to know all your confidential information like that?!

[@butchdabayboss7073]

Lol now yall sounds like the conspiracy theorists

[@molotovmary24]

I cant help but thinking this is like an episode of Quantum Leap. Sam has leaped into Reynals body and Ziggy says there's a 99% chance that if he loses this case, it could be the leap that finally sends him home.

[@thewiseguy3529]

🤣 knock it off

[@joshuaDstarks]

Uh, he’s already lost the case...

[@tvdinner325]

You need a really big portal for Jabba.

[@molotovmary24]

@@joshuaDstarks why hasn't he leaped yet?!

[@anthonybha4510]

Awesome reference

[@FilthyPhilify]

emergency motion - this is like calling the Firefighters when the ashes of your house are already cold

[@jx14aby]

And you set the fire.

[@FilthyPhilify]

@@jx14aby honestly, when Bankston revealed to Jones that he had received those files in error but they weren't marked as privileged within 10 days; I was wondering whether they were playing for a mistrial. But after hearing the closing arguments I think it was just a whole bunch of dumbassery.

[@RealRickCox]

If my defense attorney screwed up like this - I'd sue them for malpractice. What a clown show.

[@TheSingingGardener]

Defense attorney “Can we have 10 days?” Judge “you have today” 😂 that’s like asking your teacher is you can turn your late homework in 10 days after it’s due

[@sanseiryu]

But it's 2 gigs of material....Judge: shrugs...

[@tails0420ify]

@@sanseiryu apparently they already went through all of it. How else would they have known what was in the files?

[@Gisiebob]

more like 10 days after it is graded

[@nicolebrown1927]

I love how the parents lawyer is so extremely competent, upfront, blunt and he looks right at the defense counsel with such well earned disgust! He's a wonderful advocate for the victims!🤗

[@AnthonyAckme321]

Morbidly obese ginger?

[@hellooutsiders6865]

He's an actor looking to set a precedent against free speech.

[@beane6426]

@@hellooutsiders6865 It’s never been legal in this country to defame people.

[@craiggodard6419]

You have free speech but you can still defame and slander in which case the affected party is at liberty to seek recompense in law.

[@abark]

Hahah victims. Ok.

[@danhotchkiss8699]

Defense attorneys hair is half an inch away from a Mullet, and to that I object

[@thenonillusive1769]

Pretending to be concerned about medical records is laughable.

[@TheFlutecart]

Alex Jones is worried about his privacy when he has zero concern for anyone else. Irony. Obvious dirty lawyer tricks, lol!

[@missv.p.8975]

Good point !!!

[@jamestaylor3805]

They were informed of the transfer and asked if they wanted it back or not. Of course this motion was denied.

[@SCU3A_S7EVE]

It wasn’t a transfer. The prosecution was sent a link and credentials to access a specific folder of documents and then exploited those credentials to download-300 GIGABYTES-of additional documents. I mean, seriously, just wow. 😅

[@mikehathaway3659]

@@SCU3A_S7EVE They screwed up the link, probably sent the full case folder instead of a specific folder inside that folder. What they did not get into is was there a curated folder with their discovery or had the attorneys basically not done the work they where supposed to have been done, and staff just sent the link anyhow... malicouse compliance.

[@JamesQMurphy]

Sounds like the link gave them access to information from _other_ cases as well. That’s on AJ’s law firm.

[@laurencaulton103]

He's trying to blame the prosecution for his unpardonable error!!!! You sent the records!!! You put yourself in this position. This is the right-wing playbook. Twist everything up and around, and say, "Look at what THEY'VE done!"

[@Anonymoususer78913]

Lmao like the left hasn't been doing that for years. (They have)

[@thiloreichelt4199]

The plaintif please, this is a civil case. But it looks like there will come a criminal case out of this.

[@unknownkingdom]

Not a criminal case. Not prosecution.

[@benwillems8584]

@@thiloreichelt4199 contempt of court Perjury Failure to produce discovery material To start

[@dddboom]

Right wing play book? What? 😂 Think this is a question of ethics, they were accidently sent something personal, they should have deleted it.

[@u.synlig]

*”Other government agencies* are interested, and want to watch this motions hearing.” 😳 Dunh-duh! Other entities want to know whether they will legally be able to get their hands on these materials. Jones can look forward to a busy future, if this motion is not decided for him.

[@nars314]

I noticed that right away as well. Soon as it was revealed there are two YEARS worth of communications from cell phone I said the subpoenas are and SHOULD start rolling in.

[@ytsm]

That was said solely to rattle the defence lawyers.

[@GummyBearWA]

He can because she didn't.

[@rainess6456]

he said at the end it was the january 6th comittee. im sure alex is shittin his pants right now

[@tishwitch]

Yup Jan 6th committee and the DOJ lol

[@drxym]

LOL I love how he just drops in a mention of there being "intimate" notes between Jones & Roger Stone. Clearly he's saying something to any 6 January investigators watching the livestream.

[@xkristianx]

And ensuring before the session starts that the livestream is up.

[@hydrocarbon82]

How sweet it would be if this leads to even more criminal charges for the jan 6th losers - and some for AJ himself! The poor parents of these children must be dumbfounded by the recent events, after years of BS.

[@cre8tvedge]

He literally said law enforcement was asking for it before he made sure the camera was on. I can't imagine that he does'nt know that J6 committee is not law enforcement. I want to know what agencies.

[@phrogme2450]

DOJ, FBI.

[@ffrederickskitty4607]

yeah, i caught that too...and my heart leaped!

[@nannersguyaners2745]

I’m not a litigator but am a lawyer and this is out of bounds - he’s committed legal malpractice 😂

[@carlmalone4011]

Bankston is killing it. He deserves a big raise. Jones should sue his law team for malpractice.

[@prof.crastinator]

Unfortunately he will try to get this case retried on this basis. It’s all a ruse.

[@o.hernandez784]

Lol I wouldn't pass it by Jones to do just that. Hope that is public also and we get more details into his grifting.