I could listen to her for hours. She's outstanding.
@freemason4979Ай бұрын
War is the greatest friend of state power at the expense of individual freedom and prosperity
@scottscottsdale7868 Жыл бұрын
I think she is the most engaging historian today on 20th century Europe
@SuburbanDon Жыл бұрын
I agree. She also looks frisky.
@seanwebb605 Жыл бұрын
I think she is fantastic, but I am a biased Canadian.
@McIntyreBible6 ай бұрын
Without a doubt, she's one of the best!
@RobertPaskulovich-fz1th Жыл бұрын
MacMillan is phenomenal talker.
@tolyamochin4066 Жыл бұрын
Тогда докажите, иначе вы обычный болтун.
@sitting_nut Жыл бұрын
she is a very ignorant irrational "talker" , typical of british who are living in a propaganda bubble and whose scholarship is as much of a joke as british military
@michaelplunkett80592 ай бұрын
We live her in US too. Brilliant, incisive and witty. Rare in academia, rarer still in life. She balences deep knowledge with a human focused understanding.
@brucevilla2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for Uploading.
@notlimey2 жыл бұрын
Beaverbrook was not an American politician, but a Canadian financier and British politician - Margaret MacMillan seemed a bit off here.
@briandelaney9710 Жыл бұрын
Yes. He served in the wartime government for a time as a minister under Churchill
@GUSCRAWF0RD Жыл бұрын
It’s obviously not a real person “beavebrook” psh
@markprange2430 Жыл бұрын
24:03 The Western nations were not the Soviet Union's allies.
@tonyaguilar89374 ай бұрын
She didn't say the west were allies. Listen to the whole statement
@cbwilson23982 жыл бұрын
38:55 Churchill was 64, not 69, when the war started in 1939.
@michaelplunkett80592 ай бұрын
And 65 when he finally got the top job.
@michaelplunkett8059Ай бұрын
The Red defense plan was a logical defense plan. Nobody else had the largest global fleet that could interdict US forces and supplies in either ocean. A plan was beeded just to cover that base. Similarly, Britain had several warplans ti deal with different contingencies. Italian navy hostile? German navy hostile, French navy hostile? US navy hostile? Or different combinations thereof.
@knightonlibrary1183 Жыл бұрын
Stalin did not disappear for 2 weeks with a bottle of vodka! "During the first few days of the war, there was no strong central control, although contrary to later criticisms Stalin did not have a breakdown. Instead, he conferred constantly with his subordinates, making as many as twenty significant decisions on 22 June alone" (When Titans Clashed - How the Red Army Stopped Hitler - David M. Glantz, Jonathan M. House)
@kaushikbasu3778 Жыл бұрын
Correctly quoted. There is a lot of nonsense written about the first few days after the commencement of Op. Barbarossa especially about the complete vacuum in Soviet leadership. Improperly informed opinions are dished out as historical fact. David Glantz is one person who has tried to set the record right. The study of Soviet / Russian archives, which means primary research, has him to do that. Stalin perhaps felt betrayed, although even that is disputable. To him none in the West was trustworthy. As for vodka, he was rather sparing in imbibing it normally except on occasions. Do have a pleasant day.
@markprange2430 Жыл бұрын
1:07:10 "two days"
@markprange2430 Жыл бұрын
44:33 Roosevelt Roads
@yp77738yp77739 Жыл бұрын
Don’t normally find female academics very inspiring, but she never fails to force me to temporarily question my misogyny. Stunningly good lecture, as always.
@sitting_nut Жыл бұрын
its a very ignorant irrational lecture and it is so not because she is female but because she is british who are living in a propaganda bubble and whose scholarship is as much of a joke as british military
@markprange2430 Жыл бұрын
1:17:27 nowels
@LindaAndrews-ly1qf Жыл бұрын
16:45 17:59
@garthbane29555 ай бұрын
As much i enjoy listening to you Margaret " Russia's dismal performance on the battlefield" has proven you very wrong,
@Jeroen080679 Жыл бұрын
I know prof. MacMillan is a highly regarded historian, but there are to many flaws in this lecture. That's a pity.
@tolyamochin4066 Жыл бұрын
А вы не удивляйтесь, ибо у всех западных историков одна общая черта их лекций - они любят бессовестно врать. И в этом они не уидят ничего плохого.
@apocbible Жыл бұрын
Churchill was most certainly a drunk but still managed to function pretty damn well.
@michaelplunkett80592 ай бұрын
Never i.paired his abilities and he needed 3 stenographer on call to keep up with his documentary output. Notes, books, speeches, letters...
@VichoBandido Жыл бұрын
The US, antiempirialist? More than a bit off.
@executivedirector7467 Жыл бұрын
Anti-Other People's Empires. ;)
@Paeoniarosa9 ай бұрын
They were back then. Yes, ironic.
@Paeoniarosa9 ай бұрын
They were back then. Yes, ironic.
@michaelplunkett80592 ай бұрын
@@PaeoniarosaFDR was very anti British Empire. That is why the new senior partner formed NATO and global free trade for free nations, not just a narrow collection of colonies.
@0ldb1ll Жыл бұрын
By the end of 1942 the Germans had sunk 578 American merchant ships. Did neither the American public nor the politicians not notice this?
@jezalb2710 Жыл бұрын
The Nazis declared war on the USA.
@liamkelly1312 Жыл бұрын
Margaret omits to mention Mers -el -Kebir French Navy casualties of 1297 dead & 350 wounded.
@BB-vq2zv2 жыл бұрын
VIVA ORBÁN VIKTOR PRIMEMINISTER ! VIVA HUNGARIA !!!