Making the PC version of a Playstation 5 Pro

[@scottjackson5430]

try running alan wake 2, hogwarts and ark survival ascended on that pc and let us know how it does lol, this only works in theory it wont match a ps5 pro in a real world side by side comparrison. pc is better but that pc is not, also never go with the cheapest psu because it can fry your components, cause crashes and instability.

[@Tx_zx]

We should wait for RDNA4 cards to release to match ps5 pro in GPU power

[@maxsettings2906]

i agree

[@jeremyashcraft2053]

PC is where the enthusiasts are

[@richardbarron6427]

100% once you go PC you never go back

[@bills-7693]

Im getting one soon

[@ShojiAkio]

Not always true. I went from a 12600k/4080 to buying a xbox series x...tired of windows updates, broken updates, GPU driver updates, etc.

[@richardbarron6427]

@@ShojiAkio but in also use for light room and KZbin. But you can customize the case. Idk it’s like a expression personality

[@ElijahEnguerra-r6g]

​@@bills-7693I'm still saving up on one

[@ElijahEnguerra-r6g]

​@@bills-7693I'm still saving up on one 🥲

[@527bmanzella]

The video I need is how to make your gaming pc feel like a console like experience with grabbing the controller and turning the pc on and be able to jump in games easy.

[@PronounsR4Pussys]

Thats why we need Steam OS.

[@slumberingherozzz]

It's called Steam.

[@gerardomerino8558]

Literally Steam big picture

[@dat-e.z3352]

mind you that the ps5 pro will have much better ray tracing as it uses rdna 4 rt, it is a hubrid gpu architecture

[@monsterrun]

mind you the developpers are going to develop games for the ps5 classic first, for they account to the majority of the market..and beside the point, it'S wasted ressource and effort to develop for the ps5 pro, since the biggest market for it is not even interested in a overpriced mid gen machine.

[@d1ynxg868]

amd still has bad raytracing regardless

[@Mr-Clark]

I'd rather game on a PC at over 100 fps with no ray tracing, than play on a PS5 Pro with ray tracing at 30 fps.

[@xtremezone987]

It has also been brought up that the $700 price tag is for only the console itself. If you want the stand that's an extra $30. Not only that you have to pay for a membership to play games, disc drive (if you want it) & most people would want an extra controller as most consoles only come with one. Look I don't care if you play console or PC. The reality is some people are computer illiterate & don't know their way around an operating system like Windows so I understand some like the ease of use of a console. I've used computers for over 20 years & they can be at times a major headache. The main issue here is the price hike. It just doesn't make any sense.

[@Gen_X_Gamer_79]

It’s $800 + to play physical games. Which a lot of fanboys claim they do.

[@KimTe63]

Weeellll theres few problems.. if we are trying to claim it can be bought for same price . First of all no OS ? Now i do know Windows can be used without activation but who wanta ”Activate Windows” watermark and it does not even get many win updates without activation. Next , gpus do not come with hdmis or displayport cables aaaand as far as i know PC can not be mind controlled ? So you need atleast keyboard&mouse and well mousepad i guess . Next issue is that 7700xt not only is bit behind in raw performance , its also behind in raytracing tech since pro uses something that as of now is not available in the PC market (yet) . 7700xt and all other 7000series cards do not have machine learning ai upscaling . Before anyone says who cares just look at NVIDIA vs Radeon , people literally are ready to pay much more for NVIDIA because of features and biggest one is pretty much machine learning DLSS. Ofcourse it remains to be seen is PSSR as good as DLSS but what we already know for sure its gonna be better than FSR. Last thing i wanna say is that PC would be great computer but lets not try be like it would be 699 also or on par in performance

[@JahonCross]

Good build but I would go for the 6800 gpu instead. 😊

[@danielegalizzi8562]

Best value GPU on the market right there.

[@krishnas3473]

u can also go full new gen with 7600 and 16gb ddr5 ram if u buy a used graphics card

[@user-iq334]

6 core CPU? No thanks.

[@krishnas3473]

@@user-iq334 bruh its very strong single cores and gaming depends on single thread perf so ofc its good for that.

[@Hi-levels]

Use 4070 ti as a gpu to match RT There is no way rx 7700 can match rdna 4.0's Ray tracong performance. RT wise rdna 4 is a very huge jump from rdna 3 Rx 7700 is misleading. Try 4070 ti

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

FYI: There are 4000 games in store for PS5. It's been four years since the launch of the PS5 but only 50 of them support RT. You can google it. So don't act like the PS5 Pro will have every game with RT on day one. It will be only small fraction of new games and tiny tiny percentage of your game collection. So the raw GPU power is still much more representative of the PS5 Pro's real-world performance.

[@Hi-levels]

@@JackJohnson-br4qr most of these tittles are 1080p 30hz. You may as well build an rx 580 pc for that. But most played games are not those 4000 older games but most rrcent ones like black myht wukong. It is like saying 4080 is same as rx 7900 xt as PC has 40000 games and only 1 percent has RT. Wrong logic

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

@@Hi-levels Another made up statistic. Look at the real statistics on Steam or the most played games on Playstation 5. They are mainly online games with no RT, or no one actually uses it because it reduces FPS: PUBG - game from 2017, Apex Legends - 2019, Grand Theft Auto V online - 2013, Fortnite - 2017, Counter-Strike 2 - 2023, Dota 2 - 2013. Wukong is only a short-term exception, not the rule.

[@AbbasDalal1000]

Um did amd confirm the jumps? To you personally

[@Tx_zx]

We don't know the real RT performance of RDNA4. We should wait for new AMD GPUs to find out.

[@headlesschickenfarm]

The system ram should at least double the VRAM or you will loose Image quality and performance as you Windows will not map the ram to VRAM effectively. With less than 32GB of ram your system is a bit of a scam as you are limiting the performance of the GPU. You also need to compensate for the fact that you should double the CPU effective power as the texture decompression is not handled by the Console's CPU so the equivalent CPU is closer to a 3900. PCs tend to compensate for this by copying textures to virtual memory but virtual memory is no guarantee that you will have it copied to physical memory and developers will have no control over that so you have too little ram in that regard as well. More importantly you need to match the performance and not the spec If they can that or not is beside the point. The claim is 60fps at 4K with Raytracing (more precisely for standard PS5 fidelity graphics) and your system will definitely not do that.

[@NeedforGaming-rb7gc]

its kinda unfair cause there losing money becuase they make way more from their games

[@virtual7789]

They make $300 profit on every ps5? They’re not losing money

[@fish_R_stinky69]

@@virtual7789 No, they lose money.

[@AlphariousOmegon-d5d]

Going backwards in technology to ddr4 chipsets........... great! 🤦‍♂

[@krikkenstein]

Nice try 😊… I was also angry about the price and thought it is a ripoff… but than a real comparison… It’s 45% more graphics performance without ai upscaling… so a 4070 would be more appropriate. Realizing this I think we should calm down and see what the real performance will be and than decide whether to throw out our PlayStations 😅

[@Gen_X_Gamer_79]

45% plus a 6700/PS5 is a 6800 or 7700XT. Not a 4070 until proven otherwise. RDNA 2 & 3 scales the same. Just look up Tech Power Up for GPU scaling.

[@TehOnionGod]

This is pretty decent build for a 1080p gaming. The only issue is that it is AM4, and when you upgrade you will need to upgrade to AM5. For this same PC in my country (South Africa) it would cost closer to $1200. The RX 7700 XT alone costs just over $500 (R9000) on sale.

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

We try to match the performance of PS5 Pro. Nothing more, nothing less. What upgrade path does the PS5 Pro have? You can change SSD only. What CPU upgrade does it support? What RAM? PSU? See? ZERO.

[@superqaxclub]

you still need games after that, game on PS are way more expensive than PC, and paid games force you to subscribe to PS Plus just to play online. So in long term, PC would cost less, hence on PC you can even join the navy for games

[@PhotoJohn80]

Dumb statement. Zen 2 is trash nowadays. There is plenty of upgrades for am4. Can upgrade to a 5800x3d and will trash the ps5 pro and the ps6. Sony will cheap out on next gen cpu too.

[@worm6820]

decent for 1080p? im doing 1440p on a worse machine really well.

[@user-iq334]

Bro assembles the shittiest PC money can buy, you didn't prove anything, you wasted 700 dollars buying old tech.

[@slumberingherozzz]

You thermal throttling harder than a PS5 Pro.

[@danielegalizzi8562]

It is a terrible PC list, better to build a balanced Full HD gaming PC with that budget and stop caring about 4K, upscaling or not.

[@Keivz]

Nah. The claim of 45% gpu uplift from the PS5 is due to the uplift in CU, not from AI upscaling. That's pretty widely known. So you'd have to add at least 20% to the GPU price for the RT and AI upscaling you're losing with the 7700xt. Try again.

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

It's UP TO 45%! Not on average in every single game. UP TO means in best possible scenario. Like one out of ten games. How old are you that you still believe in marketing BS? And second, has been proven in real tests the RX 7700 XT is ON AVERAGE 42% stronger than regular PS5. Or you can use the RX 6800 16GB which is 44% stronger ON AVERAGE than the PS5. The RX 6800 has 16GB of VRAM. Which means it can use 3GB more memory for games and thus can have better textures and sharper image than the PS5 Pro.

[@Keivz]

@@JackJohnson-br4qr dont know what you’re on about mate. The ps5 pro will have 60 compute units, same as the 6800 which according to you is ON AVERAGE 44% stronger than the ps5. But ‘up to’ or ‘on average’ is irrelevant. You can use the 7700 xt to get a better ram equivalent and a similar gpu performance. No one is arguing that. What I am saying is that the rt and upscaling performance of the ps5 pro will be far ahead of either the 7700 xt or the 6800, which generally affords a 20% premium price uplift beyond a card with similar raster compute if you go buy historic polls on what people are willing to pay for those features (see HWU historic polling).

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

@@Keivz FYI: There are 4000 games in store for PS5. It's been four years since the launch of the PS5 but only 50 of them support RT. You can google it. So don't act like the PS5 Pro will have every game with RT on day one. It will be only small fraction of new games and tiny tiny percentage of your game collection. So the raw GPU power is still much more representative of the PS5 Pro's real-world performance.

[@JackJohnson-br4qr]

@@Keivz And second: Even Nvidia - the king of RT is not that much better in RT as you suggest for the PS5 Pro. Nvidia 40 series is typically 30% faster on average in heavy RT than AMD RDNA3. But yeah, now suddenly an old AMD RDNA 3 GPU with a new small RT chip from RDNA 4 will be much faster than Nvidia.

[@Keivz]

@@JackJohnson-br4qr games sold with RT is a better metric than total games released but that’s beside the point. The point is isn’t not a good apples to apples comparison. If I pay for a 4080 super and get a 7900 xtx instead I’d want my money back. Why? Because the the lack of an ai upscaler and inferior rt makes the 7900 xtx is an inferior product and it shouldn’t cost as much. And in the real world, it doesn’t. In the real world, people are willing to pay more for those features-about 20% more. Try playing popular games like Spider-man and Ratchet and Clank with full rt on the 7700xt using fsr vs the ps5 pro using pssr and tell me who has the better experience. Similar raster grunt, inferior upscaling and rt-not a fair comparison as people are willing to pay money for those features.

[@TV-xv1le]

Its an 8 core cpu. The gpu will be closer to an unreleased 8700xt due to improvements in RT. Just between the cpu and gpu thats around $550. Add in the 2tb ssd $650 or so. Nevermind the case, ram, power supply, motherboard, cooler. If you dont build your own which is 95% of people add another $100 to $200 in assembly costs. Add another $100 for windows because your paying for it in prebuilts if you like it or not. Your comparison is apples and oranges, comparing a prebuilt ready to go to underperforming parts at multiple outlets and self built is invalid. The reality is a prebuilt of equivalent specs will likely run you $1200+. That usually doesnt come with your keyboard, mouse. If they do its garbage. Not including a monitor. Im a pc gamer but I'm tired of seeing these copium invalid comparisons.

[@slumberingherozzz]

You mentioned copium. Ironic.

[@TV-xv1le]

@@slumberingherozzz your point? These youtubers still can't get a $700 prebuilt pc that's new out of box and will compete with the ps5 pro. They are coping.

[@CB-sh9zz]

a regular non-pro ps5 can already play games like warzone at 120 fps or 60 fps at wqhd, both with amazing graphics. i highly doubt this setup comes even close to this performance even tough it specs say otherwise. games for console are precisly optimized to its respective hardware, many people still dont get this. to even match the actual in-game performance (and not just data sheet specs) of a ps5 pro you'll have to spent a lot more. btw: the pro has 72 CUs, not 60. the tflops also grew from 10,3 to over 23, compared to a regular ps5.

[@lomnoumm7018]

Its a well known fact that consoles offer more price to performance when buying but when you factor in the price of games, subscriptions and that when you want to uprgrade you have to buy a hole new console, in the long run its way cheaper to go with a pc.

[@unknownUser-ny5gw]

bro the 7700 xt can do way more than 120 in warzone the only limiter here is the cpu, i say downgrade to 1tb and get a 5600/12400 u can even score a 12600k if on special otherwise this is better than base ps5

[@Alluvion69]

@@lomnoumm7018 The price to performance means nothing with AMD cards nowadays, the 7700XT can do way more than base ps5.. And games dont need to be optimized to hell and have better price to performance overall as well as performance for price. The ps5 pro even though it has upscaling and ai learning FSR 3.0 will still do way better in the long run and can upgrade at anytime.

[@Fragtastec]

Where did you get "72" from? ps5 has 36 CUs, the ps5 pro is claimed to have an increase of 67% CUs over ps5 base model. 36 * 1.67 = 60.12 CUs

[@nguyenbao9895]

120fps, poor performance, i can get 200+ fps in qhd with my 750$ pc

[@jshaan75]

Wait till it starts over heating 😂

[@nguyenbao9895]

bros living under a rock, only high end intel cpu are overheating, mid to low end cpu never get more than 80c even with stock cooler, if you dont know anything abt tech just shut up

[@jshaan75]

@@nguyenbao9895 haha i get into a lobby with my buddies and some of them are on PC. And that's the usual rant. PC getting too hot

[@nguyenbao9895]

@@jshaan75 80c is not hot for a pc, only 95+c will actually affect performance and considered overheating

[@Norai_1]

If you have more than 2 brain cells PC won't overheat

[@jshaan75]

@@Norai_1 thats the point. You don't need those braincells with a PS. And while it's a gaurantee that most of the popular games will be optimised for PS5 even half a decade later, this PC here would be of no good use with exactly those games.

[@Cakebattered]

PS5 Pro is $700 plus an $80 yearly subscription (PSN). Seems like any savings Sony is passing on to buyers is solely due to economies of scale rather than subsidizing the price like they do traditionally with console releases.

[@Humpypants]

You're right and it's so rare to see this comment. By the time the ps5 gen ends, online subscribers will have paid about $1000 Now predict the cost of the ps6 + $1000 and that's a better budget to work with. Comparing console and PC prices is never a 1:1 since the PC can last multiple console generations and avoid multiple years of online fees

[@worm6820]

the ps5 pro is literally just, the exact right price for its components if it was a pc, the only advantage is that you dont have to build it yourself, so lame!

[@TV-xv1le]

@@worm6820 no its not.. you cant compare a prebuilt to a non prebuilt. The ps5 pro is a prebuilt. Furthermore the cpu and gpu alone in the ps5 pro equal roughly a $550 to $600 equivalent on PC. Not including any other parts.. Windows.. price premium for assembly.

[@slipperyhitbox4460]

Wtf am i watching 😂 oh yea guys lets jump on the pc train, and build the ultimate pc, rtx 4090 etc etc and run alan wake 2 go 4k 60 ultra graphics and bam, 16 fps, even tho a bulit like that would be around 7k or more, if you buy quality., point, you cannot build a pc with ps5 pro specs for 700 bucks, that trash can pc can't do ray tracing etc etc like ps5 pro does at the frame rate it does, pc fanboys are hilarious, and before yall come at me i have a pc that costs around 8k and i tested many games, I'm not console fanboy i just love to see ppl hating for no reason, "ps5 pro disgusting price" it's 700 bucks my guy calm down, pointless video btw, "hey guys don't buy that knife buy this rusty one bc it does the same job" .... boyyyyy 😂😂