Lobster World! (feat. Morgan and Amy) - (Ken) Ham & AiG News

Ken Ham and his team have a bi-weekly "news" show, reacting to the news stories of the day from a Christian young-earth creation perspective from the Answers in Genesis staff at his Creation Museum.
Morgan, Amy and I join Ken Ham, Avery Foley, and Bodie Hodge as they discuss aliens out there, LGBT leaders affirm that “no” campaign was right, lobster humanity, and more in this episode of Answers News hosted in front of a live audience at the Creation Museum.
Morgan
/ indigogentleman
Thanks, to Shannon Q
/ @shannonq
Answers News - January 11, 2018
• Answers News - January...
Follow me at
/ paulogia
/ paulogia0
/ paulogia0

[@Shinodaluva]

I wish I was this cool in real life.

[@moosepocalypse6500]

YAY! 😁 Morgan is back! Missed you! No offense to Paul he's cool too 😉

[@Dorian_sapiens]

Morgan, being cool on KZbin is all that matters.

[@mvsawyer]

Keep browsing interents with Netscape and you're halfway there.

[@Nennah.]

suup cuz!

[@theeristicwriter8280]

Morgan Sanchez I wasn't a fan of yours back in the day but I really enjoyed your input on this video. Not entirely sure what's different this time around but I like it XD

[@bodan1196]

Let us take a moment and revel at this auspicious chance to remind Mr Ham what quote mining is. 'Ham says; "evolution is true!"'

[@phileas007]

If Ken says it, it must be true

[@juliengravier3917]

No, no, no, no, no ! the exact quote is so much better : "Evolution is fact, Millions of years is fact, and Christianity is not true" -Ken Ham, 2018.

[@godlessengineer]

Dungeon of love... Sounds like my kinda dungeon

[@cornlips7247]

Godless Engineer hahahaha even if its Ken or brody's dungeon? I dont want to see his kinky ass "dungeon of love" who knows what he would do to an innocent young man like myself(.....lets pretend I am innocent.......and young).

[@___LC___]

I don't believe Ken has been properly trained and must go through submission. I'll take him on as a sub.

[@stephenk.1997]

Where spanking and smacking are okay, but only between consenting adults. By the way, it is very creepy for a father to make a kinky joke about his daughter to her husband. Looking at you Hammie.

[@autobotstarscream765]

@@cornlips7247 But what if Ken prefers old sinners? 😏

[@MaTtRoSiTy]

Every time I see Ham and his disciples talking, I feel like I'm watching a hilarious parody of creationist stupidity. Except it's not. They're actually serious. My God (no pun...).

[@magnummax78]

Wow! The commentary here is just WAY too clever for me. I was a much funnier guy when I was an Evangelical Christian (I questioned the existence of a god and the "truth" of the Bible when I was 8...to my grandmother, who was also my Pastor. I was beaten for denying their god. After about two weeks of everyday beatings, I still refused to pray for forgiveness. It got so bad that my mother moved the entire family, so that she had a valid excuse to avoid the family church), but no one here would believe that (for lack of sufficient evidence, of course...). Now, strangely enough, it's the Bible that seems kinda funny to me!! AiG's interpretation of the Bible is so ridiculous, I'd call it "funny", if it wasn't so....not funny.

[@williambarnes5023]

For my example of complexity not indicating intelligence, I offer Exhibit A: Creationist Apologetics.

[@jonesthemoblin1400]

Ken says the number of presidents and vice presidents that don't believe in the inerrancy of scripture is mind-boggling. I say the number of presidents and vice presidents that don't know what a science is is mind-boggling.

[@VitalVampyr]

I agree with Ken. That number is greater than zero which is mind-boggling to me.

[@jonesthemoblin1400]

Our early founders were deists at best, I think people who lived before Geology, Paleontology, and Relativity can be forgiven for any "God of the Gaps" thinking, and most modern presidents (at the very least) accept the age of the Earth. Even Dubbya claimed to not be a literalist (though he had issues with the Theory of Evolution). We know Obama was no fundamentalist simply by the policies he supported, and Trump only uses Christianity for cheap political points among his highly credulous supporters. So, as far as presidents go, we may have never had a fundamentalist get elected to office, and if we did, it seems likely that it was in a time when science was still more or less mum on the age of the Earth. Though it is hard to say outright considering prior to the 1950s, religious belief was not the deciding factor that it is today when it comes to presidents. In fact, Thomas Jefferson rejected the divinity of Christ, and very little is known of Abraham Lincoln's religious beliefs. Though, close friends rejected the idea that Lincoln was a believing Christian. As far as Vice Presidents go... Well, we have Mike Pence. I think we can stop there.

[@jonesthemoblin1400]

On an unrelated note, I feel I should be worried by the fact that I aroused the attention of a Vampiric Mandalorian. Should I be worried?

[@Dorian_sapiens]

Is this a science?

[@jonesthemoblin1400]

Return of Morgan? Hell yea, I'm down.

[@lkhjsdfg]

Not only does the Bye-Bull say you can’t eat shell fish it also DOESN’T say anything about not having an abortion. In fact, it lays out exact scenarios of when you SHOULD (if you’re male) and MUST (if you’re female) have an abortion. AND, it describes the exact procedure.

[@chrispitchforth621]

We could have some fun here. Ken and his team are upset about a new Canadian law that says parents should respect kids choices on gender and sexuality. Obviously it covers a lot more stuff than that, but he doesn't car about the details. Now the law (from what I can gather watching this while cooking) also includes the child's religious choice. If we tell Ken, that people are trying to stop a law to do with respecting kids religious choices. He'll probably turn around and start defending it. While at the same time trying to condemn it.

[@wadespencer3623]

Maybe if we confuse him enough he'll split into two Kens to fight himself over it.

[@Deinonuchus]

Sweet, merciful Jesus. Can Ken and company go one minute without lying thier sanctimonious asses off?

[@laurajarrell6187]

Excellent work Paulogia and all! And I loved that you ended it on hammy finally stating a truth! Science (evolution) is right, LGBTQ and others should have equal rights, christianity is a lie. End! Personally, I'm all for at least telling ken hammy that he's gonna get stoned for breaking god's laws...eating shellfish, mixing fabrics, etc. He would be funnier stoned. Semantics, gotta love 'em. Love and Peace

[@jayg342]

Who would have thought that the Iraqi flood plain could have a flood.

[@stuartmcconnachie]

Funny hearing Ken complain about all the supposed conditions being “imposed” on people getting state funding in Canada, given his own moral charter you have to abide by in order to work at the Ark Park!

[@thechurchofshulkanism1077]

I absolutely adore how you call in experts when you can... 10/10

[@RobertNugent]

Thank you for clarifying the bit about Ken spanking another man's wife.

[@MartnCFdk]

Robert Nugent 😆👏

[@bennym8218]

i don't think AiG know's what they are talkin aboot eh

[@Nobody_Fn_Important]

sometimes I love my country of Canada. yes respecting the rights of others is soooo bad, especially when it infringes on your right to deny those rights to others eh there Kenny boy?

[@thoperSought]

15:57 _"... can you use the word 'inhumane' for a lobster?"_ so, here's the deal: "humane" originally meant "having the qualities appropriate to a human", which (ca. 1500) meant "friendly", "courteous", and so on, and shifted (by ca. 1600) to "compassionate". so, "inhumane" is literally "not befitting a human", therefore "cruel". it has literally *never* meant that the object of the compassion was a human. if Ken really wants to say that humans are a special creation, completely different from animals, this is the wrong point for him to take up. also, good job, Morgan, for focusing on what the word actually means *_now._* that's absolutely what's important; it's just that Ken is doubly wrong, on this one.

[@simongiles9749]

ThoperSought That's what I thought - it's the subject committing the act that is humane or inhumane, its not defined by the object of the act.

[@timberry4709]

Inhumane: "not befitting a human"; "without compassion for misery or suffering; cruel". It all sounds pretty "human" to me.

[@simongiles9749]

Tim Berry "The man tortured the lobster". "The man"= object of the sentence. "The lobster" = subject of the sentence. The (in)humanity is determined by the object, not the subject. "The lion mauled the wildebeest" - not an inhumane action, no humans. "The lion mauled the dentist" - also not an inhumane action, human is subject. "The dentist killed the lion" - has potential to be judged inhumane.

[@timberry4709]

"A joke isn't funny you have to explain it." The point I was TRYING to make was: being "without compassion for misery or suffering; cruel" aren't 'inhuman' traits but are, in fact, all too human traits.

[@simongiles9749]

Tim Berry You must have heard the whooshing sound wherever you are as that went right over my head!

[@tach5884]

Team America fuck yeah!

[@katieschannel742]

Tach comin to save the motherfuckin day yeah!

[@ThomasTrue]

Scotland has NOT banned smacking children - yet. The legislation has yet to go through a mandatory public consultation period, before it can be passed through the devolved Scottish Parliament. In Scotland the people are sovereign, and if the public reject it, then smacking will NOT be banned. I am hopeful that it gets through. Let me tell you what our dear Scottish Parliament HAS banned which is harmful to Christian - the teaching of creationism in state schools.

[@mamamheus7751]

ThomasTrue It's typical that there are incorrect "the UK/Scotland/Europe/(pick a country/group) is doing..." "quotes". Irrespective of the side of the argument, the facts and background circumstances to whatever is actually going on are not investigated.

[@0x777]

Actually, I don't know any countries outside the Middle East aside of the US where teaching Creationism outside some religious course could fly at all.

[@erickleefeld4883]

I know the stereotype is that Canadians say, "a boot," but to my ears it's always sounded more like, "a boat."

[@simongiles9749]

Paul channelling the Fifth Doctor there with his growing team of companions. So... Ken Ham thinks it inhumane to abort an undifferentiated foetus but has no qualms with beating up a small child?

[@quintonjones8854]

Simon Giles the cognitive dissonance of these people knows no bounds

[@ericosullivan2886]

Well, maybe he this is that he can beat the gay out of kids or something like that.

[@ParanormalEncyclopedia]

Just the breakfast I’ve been hoping for some ham and aig with Paulogia and Morgan

[@chrisvellner3922]

"...the meek shall inherit the earth." is not a promise from god. It's more of a obvious conclusion. in-her-it (verb) receive (money, property, or a title) as an heir at the death of the previous holder. "God is dead! Who has the will?"

[@JohnnyDrivebye]

OH man, I'm so confused... I say ooowt and I say shue. I'm in such a state of limbo. SHeesh...... I'm so Minnesota but I feel so California. Awesome job Morgan. LMAO..

[@Dorian_sapiens]

Don't think you can slip a Soundgarden reference past me, Mr Drivebye-if that is your real name.

[@JohnnyDrivebye]

There are those that call me... Tim.

[@Dorian_sapiens]

You know much that is hidden, O Tim.

[@browneyedbitch62]

As an American I just want to say congratulations Canada. On your stance on LGBTQ your stance on abortion. I wish we were as for a head as you all seem to be. So as an American I say Canada rules👍👍👍🍁

[@KirstenMarie_MS3]

The difference between the lobster and the fetus is that the fetus can't feel pain. Before 22 weeks of gestation the signals don't get through to the correct parts of the brain. And what doesn't reach the brain doesn't result in pain. It's the same concept that makes opioid pain medications work.

[@jmtnvalley]

One problem I've always had with the flood story is that didn't anyone else have a boat? No other boats? Really? And people wouldn't get into those boats if there was flooding? Please explain.

[@ParanormalEncyclopedia]

Guessing here but i'd think even if ships survived the waves and such supplies for a year would become an issue. Supposedly they'd all be vegetarians so they couldn't fish for food and potable water would be an issue very quick.

[@grahvis]

The first large wave would have smashed the Ark to pieces. Even thousands of years of ship building expertise couldn't produce a wooden ship even near to the size that would actually stay in one piece for very long and that would be in normal seas.

[@DoctorBastard]

Noah used all the wood on the planet building his love boat. DUH!

[@craigcorson3036]

Clearly it must be that the Lord raised up His mighty hand, and smote all of the other boats, causing them to be leaky. What other possible explanation could there be?

[@daverobson3084]

Doc Reasonable... As I understand the fable, it supposedly rained for " 40 days and nights" while the flood waters remained for a entire year.

[@FubukiShiromiya]

Thank you for calling him out on the hypocrisy with eating lobsters. I'd love to see him try to wriggle his way out of that one. Hell, I'd love to see them try to respond to any of these videos. They can spew verbal diarrhea all they want in their format, if they're so sure they're right let's hear them address these rebuttals.

[@Lady8D]

* Picks up phone, yawns...!!!!!! HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY DANCE!!!! * "YAY!!!! PAULOGIA VIDEO!!!!!! FINALLY!!!! I know it hasn't actually been long, but its felt like FOR-FUCK-ING-EV-ER!!! Morgan too?! WOOT WOOT!!! idk who Amy is yet but still, yay!!!" ~my last few moments =) Edit) idk how this bold crap works...thought I figured it out earlier but apparently not quite. Here's hoping no bold lettering this time.

[@Shinodaluva]

Lady D Amy is the fact checker of fact checkers, check out other Ham and AiGs videos with her.

[@Lady8D]

Morgan Sanchez Will do! Thanks! Also, are you Paulogia's co-host Morgan too or no? (Argh! I'm having struggles with word memory at this moment, sorry for wording if not correct. WTF brain?!?! ugh)

[@MW3BlueBlud]

"...the truth comes out" "You mean the truth comes oot"...."love it!" 😂😂 Also props for the epic Barry O'Bama Irish pub pic ha

[@ChasingCornfields]

Morgan you crushed it! Also Netscape?! Yeah!

[@MW3BlueBlud]

"Jacked up and ready to go"...... Wooooooooooooooooo!!

[@PewReview]

Until I read the description, I thought this was going to be about the Jordan Peterson thing.

[@Paulogia]

can you believe that Peterson ruined a thing? sheesh

[@PewReview]

Paulogia He's definitely not known for causing controversy. Especially not in KZbin comments.

[@JamesiaInc]

Paulogia What exactly is your issue with Jordan Peterson?

[@galloe8933]

Lobster world does in fact sound like it could be a fun place to go to. Also, "the stunner" ride would always have super long lines so there is that...

[@Lobsterwithinternet]

Granted, we make long lines everywhere since we travel long distances via conga line.

[@rubberlegs15]

290 thumbs up, 1 down. Evening from the UK Ken!

[@henrikbger4111]

8:55 "corporal punishment ... done the right way" hmmmm ... creepy ...if he wasn't actually talking about kids....

[@spamfilter32]

Great fun as always. I know that many Christians say that the we no longer need to follow the laws in Leviticus and Deuteronomy (usually in reference to mixed fiber clothes and eating lobster) because of Jesus' sacrifice wiping the slate clean and creating a new covenant with man. However If Ham uses that as a justification for eating lobster, then we must also apply this to the laws against homosexuality in Leviticus. If he uses that justification then he puts himself in a bit of a sticky pickle in regards to his view on homosexuality. If he does not invalidate Leviticus then he is also in a bit of a sticky pickle because not only is he violating God's law by eating Lobster, he is doing something far worse to God as he is leading others into sin by encouraging others to eat lobster and thus violate Gods law.

[@Shinodaluva]

spamfilter32 mmm. Pickled lobster was all I needed to hear.

[@simongiles9749]

spamfilter32 It doesn't really make theological sense anyway. Jesus claims that He's not there to overturn the Mosaic Law, but the human sacrifice part of Christianity only really replaces all the verses and verses of barbecue recipes from Leviticus as the "sacrifice to end all sacrifices". Later we get Paul claiming that circumcision only needs to be metaphorical to help his sell to the Gentiles. So it's the immutable law of God. Until you decide it isn't. As long as you say Jesus told you in a dream.

[@Roedygr]

Since the bible is one big lie, and Christians base their lives on it, I have yet to find an honest Christian. They will happily tell any lie if they think it promotes the bible. "What harm would it do, if a man told a good strong lie for the sake of the good and for the Christian church… a lie out of necessity, a useful lie, a helpful lie, such lies would not be against God, he would accept them." ~ Martin Luther (1483-11-10 1546-02-18 age:62)

[@robbinhuckelberry4168]

I'm glad I get to watch the Hammlets through the lens of rational thinkers, if I watched on my own I'd be depressed by their discussions. To paraphrase the principal from Billy Madison, at no time in their incoherent ramblings did they even approach anything resembling a rational thought, and we are all dumber for having listened to it.

[@Blackacreonfire]

Great observations on the gov't policy on not funding those who are working to illegal ends as determined by our Charter and the SCC.

[@TheGrassdawg]

The list of conquerors is not a short one. When not slaughtering and enslaving each other they were being slaughtered and enslaved by Egyptians, Hittites, Phonecian/Philistine/seafaring Canaanites, Arad Samarians, ( Syrians), Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks (even the Maccabees didn’t fare so well although we got Hanukkah out of the deal), and the Romans. And nobody at that time period did well against the Romans. Ya think people might understand that Judeo-Christianity is not a religion that does well with adversity. It may be why the “pie in the sky”, is such a prevalent doctrine. “Cat got dead, dawg done runaway, wife’s at the neighbors, car repossessed, and the mortgage is way overdue. Hey, at least when I die I git tah see Jaysus!” or some such drivel.

[@thomasridley8675]

The only rights they want protected is their to right to lie. Reading the bible is totally subjective or you wouldn't have so many different.interpretations.

[@ronthered138]

Am I hallucinating, or do the Answers in Genesis people sound like a pack of demented hamsters? I noticed that they seemed to be speaking at an accelerated rate, so I watched the linked original video and I am convinced that they are speaking slightly faster in the Paulogia video than they are in their original video. Time Stamp Paulogia Clip AiG Clip 0:50 1:21 2:22 2:29 7:16 7:29 10:01 16:25 After listening to these four sets of clips I became convinced and did not go all the way to the end of the videos. Is anyone else hearing it?

[@TrueMetis]

Even if we grant their is some level of physical punishment that's okay and effect, not everyone can be trusted to stay within those limits, and people are going to argue what those limits are. So better just to ban it entirely. There's no freedom or right here you can use to argue against that either.

[@Lizard-813]

Now I'm confused about that end bit. Was that quote mining? Should I be disappointed in you, Paul?

[@richardmooney383]

"Humane" refers to the way humans are expected to behave with empathy and compassion for other conscious beings, whether they be humans or other animals. The word has the same derivation as the word human but it refers to how humans are expected to behave rather than how they can expect others to behave towards them. So a human can treat a lobster inhumanely but a lobster cannot act inhumanely towards a human.

[@subtotalaljar3620]

I find it funny you added the “fake orgasm” scene when she was talking about abortion law.

[@AnnoyingNewslettersPage6]

So this prepper proto Noah tells us the same kind of story as the ant and the grasshopper...? Who would have thought.

[@TheKyrix82]

Also, "All it takes is one gay to ruin your day" Sounds like a Christian Protest Chant

[@timhallas4275]

Who's the guy with the face paint and sword on his back?

[@carlpen850]

My neighbor stoned his children to death... but he told the judge he did it in a "loving" way.

[@Uzicide]

MORGAN IS BACK!!!! About time. This channel was starting to really going down hill. =)

[@Paulogia]

right?!?

[@RainbowFlowerCrow]

Seriously, I love the intro song so much; it really puts me in such a good mood 😂😂😂😂💜 I love seeing whenever there's a new Paulogia video notification..your videos are so insightful and well made. From someone who was raised with Ken Ham videos, but who eventually found freedom from religion in adulthood, thank you so much for your work. 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 🎶"Flip 'em, flop 'em, flip 'em, flop 'em, HAAAAaammmm n' eggs! "🎶🍳🎶

[@Paulogia]

Thanks rainbow! That means much

[@micahdaniel123]

The outright lies aig tells are disgusting

[@craigcorson3036]

disgusting*

[@micahdaniel123]

Craig Corson thanks. Damn autocorrect

[@craigcorson3036]

Always happy to help out. ;-)

[@beethebard]

Sweet, Morgan's back

[@spamfilter32]

First time I read this, I read it with out the coma. And boy does that change the meaning.

[@blaster23456]

Aren't lobsters biologically immortal and are immune to aging?

[@skepticpsychologist5458]

Another really effective and entertaining fact checking episode. Thank you Paulogia, Morgan and Amy. Keep up the great work!!

[@SonicYouth-si8mn]

I reccomnend 'the secret life of lobsters' by Trevor Corson. Great facts on their lives and the lobster men and woman of down east Maine. A beautiful place you should visit.

[@timeshark8727]

Damn... its a big, blinky, party on Paulogia. Look at them all. Good video.

[@Paulogia]

mesmerizing

[@reformCopyright]

I hoped to be devastated and you bring Morgan? Dammit. Wheeeeeeeeeeee!

[@Greenbd100]

Awesome video. Thank you for bringing Morgan back on. This should rank in her top five best contributions for your series.

[@Paulogia]

she's amazing

[@Alyenbird]

By one common interpretation of Acts 10, the dietary injunctions were removed in the New Testament. Course not everyone agrees on this interpretation as is usual with Biblical passages.

[@alan5094]

Yes, interpretations... that's a good reason in itself for discounting the Bible - any god which is so incompetent as to produce an instruction manual that can be used to justify more evil than good is no author, let alone a god.

[@scifimind991]

You got it wrong you drink beer and worship pizza

[@banon9573]

Good to see Morgan back. Also have Amy on more often.

[@Nickelini]

Yea! Amy!

[@jamescunningham4418]

Avery ...Georgia light

[@simongiles9749]

James Cunningham I thought they'd pulled a Darrin from Bewitched and swapped actors while pretending nothing had changed. #dickyorkwasbest

[@timhallas4275]

Morgan, I love you. let's meet up.

[@snake_hole2886]

WAAAAA...? No evidence of a global flood? Kent H.would have massive umbrage with that one missy! LOL

[@daverobson3084]

Snake Hole But that is because he is an unapologetic con man.

[@MDHilgersom]

Morgan and a thunderbirds clip? Best episode yet xD

[@cornlips7247]

It is so great to see Morgan with you again Paul! She was awesome as always but somehow even better. Maybe it was the waiting that improved the final product but I will go as far as praying that we dont have to wait so long to see her again next time.😂 Amy was fantasticly informative and entertaining. I cant wait for the next episode. My heart breaks a little in the final seconds of every video and heals again with the first few seconds of the intro song of the next episode.😄

[@Paulogia]

thanks for the kind words, cornlips

[@ElectricBoogaloo007]

Is it possible to simultaneously be an atheist AND believe that abortion is wrong?

[@alan5094]

Being atheist entails no more than not believing someone else's claims about god so yes, totally possible.

[@comicalmommy271]

Hooray Morgan is back! Missed you!

[@CraigShearer]

LOL @ Hyperbole City! :)

[@userdeleted8825]

Happy to see our favorite little alcoholic back on the show

[@Shinodaluva]

The Eccentric Naturalist little? LITTLE?

[@Jett-King]

Canada is so fucking awesome

[@ComradeDragon1957]

I'm actually am eating ham and eggs for breakfast while watching this video

[@ComradeDragon1957]

Desperadox23 They were chicken eggs! I swear! The ham was definitely Ken Ham though.

[@ComradeDragon1957]

voodootree yeah I can't help but follow along when the intro comes along.

[@alan5094]

*Zoidberg !!* _That's Lobstertainment._ [ scuttles off sideways >>>>>>>>>>>>>>]

[@petehopper9890]

YES!!! The return of Morgan

[@firefly4f4]

Great. Thanks Paul. You reminded me that the movie, "The Lobster," exists. I had finally managed to banish it from my mind, but no... you had to go and remind me of that awful piece of emotionless dreck. Yes, I know that was the point... doesn't mean I had to like it.

[@Paulogia]

sorry, dude

[@banon9573]

I had never heard of that movie but gather that I need to feel pity on everyone who has watched it.

[@Shinodaluva]

Fucking SAME HERE.

[@crabwatarigani1049]

(sarcasm warning.) "why would we possibly expect people who are not following the bible to be honest." hmmm... not sure. I mean you OBVIOUSLY cant be a kind and honest person without believing in an all powerful sky-dude who can see everything.

[@mamamheus7751]

Isn't it amazing how so many "Christians" deliberately misunderstand the meaning of Peter's dream in Acts (Ch 10? It's been a long time...). Just because the unclean food is being used as an analogy, doesn't make all food available for Christians to eat. But if they choose to eat whatever food they like, they can't hold onto anything else in Leviticus as a rule by which to live their lives. Except for the 10 Commandments - that's what I was taught was meant by Jesus when he was being "scolded" for breaking so many of the 640+ laws (I heard an Orthodox rabbi saying that he wasn't sure exactly how many there were, and no rabbi he knew did either. I think he took a punt on 648 total). The reply was in effect - I don't do absolute quotes much these days. The memory isn't what it was - to follow the 10 Commandments and the 2 he added. Love thy neighbour etc, and turn the other cheek. The group of commandments to which he was referring makes sense if it's the 10 we know now, as not killing, cheating etc fits in best with his rules. I don't remember him saying that to pick and choose his teachings was ok, or picking on a group of people was fine by him. But - for Hovind and his ilk - he did order people to pay taxes! No, Kent, he didn't mean only to give Caesar his own money, it was to give anything that wasn't God's to whomever issued it, so stop using that as an excuse regarding being a bloody criminal!

[@alberich3099]

I'm all for corporal punishment, but let's not be selective about it to children. I want to be able to hit my co-workers, fiancé and constumers if I feel they behave in a way I deem unwanted. What ? we have a law against useind phycical force against other people called battery or assault ? NO way corporal punishment is biblical and MUST be used universially. Oh and how dare you not alloweing to smack my child against a rock if she curses me, i feel persecuted. !!

[@RodrigoTechador]

"Regressed," Morgan. Not "digressed." You want to see how far you've regressed.

[@RodrigoTechador]

Lord Billionaire Black Belt Possible. I do hear a lot of people these days saying "digress" when they mean "regress," though.

[@Shinodaluva]

I constantly digress my regression

[@thomasruwart1722]

I'm surprised nobody mentioned the 1964 movie The Incredible Mr Limpet where Don Knotts most certainly identified as a fish. It must be true - I saw it with my own eyes... in black and white!

[@acerbicatheist2893]

Ha ha ha ha ha haaa!! Oh dearie me... Ken Ham says, "I'm a spanker!". This is funny/horribly sick/creepy...and it's enough to make one rather ill.

[@mattdrat3087]

Have you noticed how incredibly fast everyone on Ken's team talk? I reckon it is both a strategy, don't let the words sink in and pause for thought, and also very easy for them since all they do is regurgitate the same BS program after program. They have no interest in learning anything, they have no interest in expanding their knowledge of anything, it's all just hey-ho-off-we-go-same-old-same-old. Obviously, having made a living out of peddling this utter rubbish for years on end, I can understand they just want to continue doing so till they die instead of getting an education and a proper job, but still...

[@PurpleKnightmare]

How does one even believe in Unidentified Flying Objects? It is just something flying that has not been identified. LOL I'm so happy to have Morgan back!

[@hughes645]

yay Morgan again :-)

[@Svartalf14]

2:50, lady Morgan, this is the first time I see you (yeah, I discovered Paulogia only a couple months ago), but, you know, that remark was kind of gratuitous when applied to people who have to see intelligence behind anything more organized than total chaos.

[@Roedygr]

"done in love, not abuse or anything" Killing everyone on earth IS abuse. In no way was it love. It was out-of-control wrath. If somebody killed their child to discipline them, we would lock them up for decades.

[@HConstantine]

Did Ham really say that there was some way to understand the Bible not based on ancient Near Eastern mythology? Like there is some other way to understand it? I was going to hop over to Ham's channel to discuss that, momentarily forgetting why that is impossible. This female cartoon--her idea of the history and sociology of Judaism and Christianity is really based on the Life of Brian? It would take about two hours to respond to her little Gish Gallop there (after 3:40 or so). While creationists obviously intend to deceive, I will give her the benefit of the doubt and suppose shes is just speaking out of ignorance.

[@imagomonkei]

On Leviticus 11, AiG is adamantly against the idea that Christians should keep the Torah (or the parts they don't like, anyway).

[@phillyphakename1255]

Did you notice in the corporal punishment section that all the AiG people were basically just saying "Yup." to each other? There really isnt a logical or moral argument in favor of it, just a collective desire to adhere to tradition without critically examining if it is a good tradition. When it comes time to actually defend it, all they can muster is an "mhh-hmm" so they dont break with the social order.

[@Amoebatirith]

"Coroporal punishment isn't abuse." Ha ha ha I'm laughing because he has such sad delusions. Certainly my parents spanking me quickly taught me to obey my parents, but it was out of fear, not out of respect. I still to this day will not discuss anything with them in which I know they would not agree and would cause an argument, because any time I tried to defend myself and explain my actions or what happened when I was younger, I was slapped and told to "stop talking back." My parents have improved over time, but I do not trust them so we do not have a close relationship at all even though it appears we do because I call them at least every other week if not every week. I don't like to say I was abused as a child because I know it could have been much worse and that ultimately my parents do love me, but I definitely won't agree that they were justified to spank, slap, or put soap in my mouth. If I have kids, I want to try to teach so that they can develop discipline instead of "disciplining" them.

[@itsonlycumin7461]

Why does anyone look up and only think possibly, why do we look at oil wells and think there, granite, why is the ocean just miracle foam with waves?? Life is big and you're born alive!

[@whynottalklikeapirat]

While I am all on board with rights and equal treatment - I don't think anyone, in a democracy can require me to respect anybody or anything. Respect at the level of the individual is something you feel or not. Much like belief. I can however be expected to act civilly in different ways in different social or professional roles, and recognise rights, or conform to legally acceptable behaviour. But I sure as shit can't be required to feel or express respect for anyone if I don't feel like it. I do not respect people who hit their children or effing spouses. Nor do I respect the beliefs of religious people. I may or may not respect them as persons, based on their actions. I do not expect them to respect me either. It is not a right I have. It cannot be ordained. Respect, like trust is earned. As for social roles I am a teacher. When I am working, my personal feelings of respect or the lack thereof are usually irrelevant. If they become too difficult to handle it's up to me to leave the situation, it'snot the problem of anybody else. So should we curb our actions, based on roles and situations? Of course. The demand here should be that I act professionally. Not that I fake respect I don't feel. In that situation it is a private matter. But in public discourse, as a citizien I think I have every conceivable right to my opinion. And so do the people I most disagree with. And I am sure as shit not going to respect what I don't respect.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

8:50 on the subject of corporal punishment i like to tell the story of my school where caning was the norm, we used to hide the teachers canes or shred them, but we still got a whacking. the part of the story that's relevant though is that we had a competition to see who could get the most canings in a month, so that's how effective sadistic punishments are, we were going out of our way to get into trouble, all we took away from that was how to be effective bullies. we had teachers that quit cos they got tired of being threatened, we had at least one who had a nervous breakdown, and a supply teacher that had already gone through hell came back full time for some reason, but he only lasted a term, so much for bible stories in morning assembly. on the other hand we had a gay english teacher, a little old lady who also taught english, and an art master who influenced my whole life, who NEVER had any trouble, they had us enthralled. if you have to use force to get people on board, you're doing something wrong. when pain is inflicted in the name of love it's usually called bdsm. when i hung out with people from the bdsm community i found them to be supportive, intelligent and caring, you have to have trust if you're letting someone tie you up and whip you, but a common theme, most not all, was abuse at an early age, and often as not from a family member. beating your children is not going to help them become well adjusted. 9:30 thank bastet you cleared that up. although i know, or used to know, a lot of women who enjoy being spanked, and several female authors who make tidy sums from books around the subject. it's all a matter of taste.

[@christiandefender8160]

Paulogia, first I want to say that i agree with many of your critiques of Ken Ham and young-Earth creationism from a scientific viewpoint. Nonetheless, as a Christian, one of the things I was wondering is, have you looked at all of the documentary evidence for the New Testament? It's a mistake to assume that just because a literal interpretation of Genesis is false that this means that Jesus didn't rise from the dead, and I pray that you will reconsider your stance with respect to the New Testament.