Not Seeing Things Clearly

[@kenishaallison]

This plaintiff is ridiculous 😂

[@FenderBender5150]

yeah, he's an idiot.

[@ralphtime]

Lol he little off. Well maybe lotta bit

[@aiming4peace254]

You put it in a very nice way. It's more like: his lights are all on, but nobody's home.

[@TaiLegend]

He’s too proud to take a settlement. He wants the whole shebang regardless if he is entitled to it or not and stood his ground foolishly. Now when he needs a new pair of glasses for reading which was brought up to him multiple times via his own testimony and the judge’s comments and recommendation, he is going to be out a lot more than $240. Ridiculous didn’t even begin the cover this

[@cantbecanceledpodcast]

I see you on every show!! I love it!🤣🤣🤣

[@adwallace021938]

The title of 'Not Seeing Things Clearly' accurately explains the plaintiff's thought process!

[@t.lucalake8963]

The plaintiff clearly needs full- time adult supervision.

[@amandasthaish7716]

🤣🤣🤣

[@MoncheriShae]

This is a clear example of how strong and wrong so many ppl of the older generation are and the complete stubbornness they have to open their mind to basic comprehension. He left court none the wiser.

[@jeffreysalley]

Wow! That's well said.

[@blessedtobealive]

One day WE will be considered "the older generation". I dont think its a generational thing, there's a fool among every group.

[@Hazel.Eyed.Gemini]

“There’s no fool, like an old fool”

[@cynthiavaldez7127]

Left non the wiser AND more the no refund. 😂😂😂 Sounds like justice to me.

[@kerrywhite5253]

​@@Hazel.Eyed.Gemini😂😂

[@leisurefarm]

It's extraordinary the plaintiff has so much pride that he can't accept he WAS wrong even if it's in his interest to do so. He didn't even need to apologise, but just to accept what the defendant, the surgeon and the judge recommended. Breathlessly dumb.

[@weseywilliams6193]

Lol. Breathlessly dumb. I never heard that term but I love it and gonna steal it 😂

[@amandasthaish7716]

Can I just say that I'm happy the plaintiff went home with nothing!!

[@shirleywiese5230]

Me too

[@aliceharrell4929]

Right

[@BOSSLADY-cu8vs]

Right! He ran up my blood pressure and I'm sitting at home on the couch with the air conditioner on🤦🏾‍♀️

[@shirleywiese5230]

@@BOSSLADY-cu8vs 🤣🤣

[@jakedollins1710]

no respect, no morals, lacking ethics, etc.... dude needs his momma back

[@DanDwyer64]

There's none so blind as those who will not see

[@bhornannawindeedeigh5007]

Perfect.

[@glenngatlin8475]

😅😅😅

[@Hazel.Eyed.Gemini]

There’s no fool, like an old fool

[@chrstphrmtthw16]

Awesome

[@wynottgivemore9274]

@@Hazel.Eyed.Gemini that applies to u too!

[@Catloudan]

This plaintiff is so far removed from reality, it is unreal!

[@quantaydagoat5795]

So he turned down a pair of FREE GLASSES THAT HE NEEDED and stills needs glasses that he most likely had to PAY MORE money for. I hope he sees this 😂😂😂

[@lynsmalec5484]

Just bcuz you bring a case to court it doesn’t mean that you are right or that you will win. 💁🏼‍♀️

[@kathydoty8718]

Wow, we've all heard the saying, "Don't cut off your nose to spite your face." Never has that been more correct than in this case. And yet, he STILL doesn't get it! Sad.

[@tomswill9189]

😂 yup

[@EatWell23QWB]

Okay, so let me get this right. The plaintiff chose the defendant’s eyewear shop because it was a better choice cost wise. The judge gives the plaintiff an option of, 1. no refund, or 2. a new pair of reading glasses at no additional charge. The plaintiff says, “No!” So, this plaintiff who was most concerned about cost ends up giving away $240.00 to the defendant, but still has to buy a pair of reading glasses. Which means he’ll get them elsewhere since he was too stubborn and/or not smart enough to take the judge’s second option. Clearly, the plaintiff is not very good at math.

[@daddyharry6065]

Correct. But remember that cataract surgery to the plaintiff meant he was going to see better without glasses too. 🤣🤓

[@gene5148]

He really doesn't get it.

[@KylaHaynes-v5x]

This one was painful to watch 😂

[@thomaslukowsky5121]

The plaintiff is so stubborn…up to a point where I personally suspect the beginning of a mild dementia (not sure how old he is). Sad, his life isn‘t going to be easy.

[@elvickRULES]

For some people it’s more important to be right in their own mind. Refusing means he can continue to feel right about the situation that he got ripped off. Rather than take the glasses (whether he needs them nor not) and admit he was wrong

[@christopherramon-reid2000]

Aww. That was so sweet the way she got the defendant to agree with her! I’ve never seen her do that 💕

[@hottuna2006]

She wouldn't have done it if the plaintiff was a white male, but this is just another example of infantilization of black people and it's demeaning. Treat them like children who don't understand and can't help themselves. C'mon, they don't know any better so just give them a break.

[@randys6220]

I thought it was ridiculous and stupid for the Judge to push the defendant repeatedly to agree to put up with the plaintiff's BS ever again. Especially after the plaintiff reigned on their agreement reached and sued him.

[@dmills7080]

​@@hottuna2006I'm a bit confused about your statement. In this case the plaintiff was refusing to admit any responsibility or common sense. The plaintiff was being idiotic and acting childish. Maybe she was treating him like that because he was acting like that.

[@elisabetpurve2908]

@@hottuna2006 Are you sure? Not everything is about prejudice and racism (and no, I´m not "white"

[@mrshappilymarried1]

​@@dmills7080he's clearly a racist. Nothing confusing about it.

[@michellekay1207]

It’s amazing how the Plaintiff honestly doesn’t “get it” 😮

[@idiaakanbi3713]

He had no case and still does not understand, just shocking

[@kaiserschnitselsr]

monkeys never do

[@meicolar1724]

He doesn't get it cause he's seeing it through a different lense....his age...he's saying the shop referred him to the optometrist who performed his surgery....therefore he figures they shoul have known his vision would not be the same afterwards....thats their line of business....however what he fails to understand people do not operate the same like yrs ago....where they probably would have told him to wait on the glasses cause his vision would change... Bottom line though...lesson learned...he should have taken the new glases😢

[@joemancurreri6635]

NO EDUCATION...

[@annmackenzie5253]

He DEFINITELY DOESN'T GET IT! Wooooow, the comments to Doug at the end really sums it all up. 😵‍💫

[@nanealdiamond28]

His pride got in the way of this case and he threw away all that money. In the beginning of his case he said he needed his money and cancelled the first pair of glasses with a different company and got his money back to go see this new doctor

[@Bebedollie]

Some people are hard headed like that

[@joepropsnyc]

Older people are often stubborn & slow to accept reasoning that disagrees with them. I go through this every day.

[@Monika-bc3dq]

It's enough to hear plaintiffs introduction to know how this ends... He's beyond ridiculous.

[@ryans413]

The judge got the guy a fare deal and he still didn’t want it. The guys ridiculous

[@musicalme27]

*fair*

[@ILOVEBACONBOY2018]

too much pride is not always a good thing.

[@jackienilsson1156]

I’m am an optician and I will tell you, judge smiling or not I would stood my ground about not servicing this man. What will happen is you will make the glasses and this guy will come by every time the wind blows too hard, every time he drops his glasses and he’s going to complain about this pair of glasses to you for the rest of your life. You will never make a single cent out of him And he will drain the life out of you. I would partner with that doctor and dismiss this guy as a patient legally. Keeping excellent records of course.

[@linski8663]

Yes, they do it every single time. Ugh

[@blackbettyboo5039]

@@linski8663Who are they?

[@linski8663]

@@blackbettyboo5039 the dumbass patients. Don't try to start shit.

[@uncleishy]

Stubbornness got the plaintiff nothing. A lesson learned the hard way.

[@Itsmyrap]

Now come on sir. Nobody is giving you a full refund for glasses you ordered a week prior 🙃

[@michaelrusso6822]

"Stupid is as stupid does."

[@biancadoss11]

The black guy in the audience with the red sweat shirt cracking up at the plaintiff is ME 😭😂

[@claypartridge7553]

😂

[@butyoucancallmesam]

That's an old hard-headed man.

[@kaiserschnitselsr]

a low iq baboon

[@jc5531]

Some people are their own worst enemy lol

[@porridgesilt]

The irony of not being able to read the receipt from an eyeglass store…🤓

[@marymarysmarket3508]

Hahaha

[@tuxedonix2884]

I am always amazed at how many people think they dont have to pay for products services,

[@karensmith6815]

Lmaoooooo “only because of u” that was so cute awwwwww lol

[@demondriver5151]

This dude is the epitome of Bullheadedness 💯

[@MedOKC]

Plaintiff is a dense as a door post.

[@tamwy19]

What happened to the customer is always right. You see the customer is not always right sometimes the customer is a pain in the ass and you have to say bye-bye😅

[@b8nnytez]

If she looked at me like that, she could have ANYTHING!

[@JamesBrown-nr8or]

Bit his nose to spite his face 😳

[@patrickchubey3127]

Option 1: You get nothing. Option 2: You get something. Is it just me? I wouldn't have to think about it.

[@shabless81]

We don’t have ice cream can have a cookie or nothing. I want Icecream!!! Some people don’t mentally progress beyond the reasoning power of a toddler.

[@brookevalentineuniversity]

😂😂😂😂😂 Slow bus now watch he go home and say.. DAMN WHY I DIDNT TAKE THAT OFFER 😂😂😂

[@natasharobinson2008]

It's giving "I didn't even graduate high school" vibes smh....this was straightforward

[@tiendaphillips8738]

"You lost on let's make a deal today" lmao

[@honeyblikk]

yea that was funny 😂😂😂

[@AlessandroCalzaStudio]

The fact that people like the plaintiff use my oxygen bothers me

[@loveyoutube2177]

The thing I don’t understand is they took his money for an order that wouldn’t work after he goes to the cataract place they sent him to. They should have recommended he wait to order until after the appointment bc it would be a different prescription.

[@b8nnytez]

he was seen EXCEPTIONALLY quickly, so quick the shop probably thought he'll need the glasses in the meantime. Just because he was sorted out quickly he thinks he can take a dump all over consumer law. He can't, which is why he lost. He was one of the most ridiculous plaintiffs I've seen on here, and that's saying something

[@kimmccormack9905]

I agree! That was poor practice. But the judge made it seem like he told them he would skip the cataract option and just go for the glasses, then afterwards decided it was better. I would say the first place was skamming him giving him glasses and telling him the cataract surgery would be super expensive, and the new place found a way he could get it cheap enough to afford. He seems too proud to say that it was about money. He even seemed to struggle when he was saying this dudes place was small amount cheaper and he was duped into paying more anyway.

[@TalyaT922]

There was no guarantee that the plaintiff would follow through with cataract surgery. The defendant may make a suggestion, but he has no control over what the plaintiff does. In the meantime, he has a job to do. The onus was on the plaintiff to wait to order glasses.

[@puzzlite]

before the doctor recommended a surgeon for him, he already knew he needed cataract surgery but was scared. they cannot read his mind to know that he will finally go through with the surgery. all they know is that a man who KNEW he had cataract surgery but was too scared to get it in the past, ordered glasses to help him see. He could've seen the new doctor and still been too scared to have the surgery and would consequently still carry on living his life wearing glasses. Basically, if you order glasses, do it BEFORE you get corrective lenses.

[@linski8663]

Patients still need to see before and after the surgery takes place. We allow them to do a prescription change within a specific time frame for free.

[@cheyanne8335]

He chose to let his money go to waste? Now he has to go buy new glasses somewhere else.. spending more money. TF lol He’s ridiculous.

[@annward4149]

Is the plaintiff for real. Come on man really. That'd be like wearing a pair of boxers for three months . Then you want to take them back to Walmart for a refund.

[@POOHGZY1978]

Clear example of how people get in their own way‼️‼️‼️

[@marcusredwine9918]

I don’t understand what deal he was seeing in his head, the judge gave him a great deal but I guess he saw and heard something different in his head.

[@TOOTIELUV87]

“I got a letter from claims small” 😂😂😂

[@bhornannawindeedeigh5007]

Plain and simple, the plaintiff ordered and paid for his script (glasses). After he orders his glasses, he then decides to have eye surgery. He goes ahead and has eye surgery. After the eye surgery, his eyesight is all better, so he doesn't need the glasses he originally ordered, but since they're a prescription especially created for him, he can't just expect to return them to the defendant to get his money back... ... so naturally, he loses. Fairly. It has NOTHING to do with his race, as Adrian would wrongly have y'all believe. 🙄

[@lakishaburroughs7966]

He never mentioned race and he stated the defendant was a good guy , they only had this issue.

[@janetmccoy7945]

Where did he once mention race?

[@misseazar4250]

@@janetmccoy7945Adrian always mention raceeeeeeee

[@sjn141]

If y’all haven’t read Adrian comments then that’s why you don’t get it. He always thinks Judge Milan being biased towards POC and ruling based of race.

[@nmatky9327]

​@@lakishaburroughs7966we are talking about adrian, a famous commenter that always accuses judge milian of racism

[@DPhasely]

Wow! Plaintiff must have dementia.

[@lecoramassamba]

🫨😵‍💫 how I felt listening to this case smh

[@debrahill2272]

The plaintiff still needs eyeglasses, but he refused the second pair that actually he'd already paid for..🤑🤓

[@elvickRULES]

I hope I never get so old as to become this stubborn. “I choose neither”. Then you effectively choose door number 1 which he is nothing.

[@uaintseememaaan8901]

You know JM went to her chambers and had a drink after this case.

[@nBasedAce]

Adrian Prince got channel banned by KZbin and now he's back as Adrian Knight.

[@yoyolo8465]

🤣

[@Goose00123]

🤭

[@MikeNelli-uq2wl]

Hes having surgery on his Cadillac.

[@thale6945]

😂😂😂

[@bristroyer1723]

Im gonna order at a restaurant. Go to the other restaurant and order there too. Then go back to the other restaurant and tell them nevermind after they make my food

[@HardPass]

plaintiff is every retail shop worker's worst nightmare

[@MrCharlesEldredge]

Either he's not smart enough to understand, or, he's one of those who are so stubborn they will cut off their nose to spite their face. I think God was helping out the decent defendant. You know he's very thankful he doesn't have to have ANY dealings with this man again.

[@cyndedawson3129]

Mr take the glasses or go home!!!!! 😂🤣👏👏👏👏

[@nilasmith8801]

he said "let mre explain something to you" no sir you are wrong

[@MikeNelli-uq2wl]

Privileged comes in all nationalities

[@gthomas4real499]

Someone should have come to court with him. He really doesn't get it. SMH. However, his friends and family may have already tried, too.

[@befrugalwithus]

At 0:37 If looks could kill. Man that stare is kind of scary.

[@kimr282]

I love when the judge plays let’s make a deal.

[@premadimauro2691]

They should not have given him eyeglasses knowing that he needed eye surgery. My eye dr said. No nEw prescription till get cataract surgery. That makes the most sense

[@BeccasaurousRex270]

Not everybody gets eye surgery though. He could have gone to the consult and decided against it like he previously has

[@Aura983]

He probably said he was scared and wouldn't do the surgery.

[@NubianP6]

I wonder if the plaintiff realizes how utterly ridiculous this just made him look. 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@Imissyoulou]

No, because he is stuck on stupid and locked in on dumb.

[@blackbettyboo5039]

It's not that serious

[@rblady3804]

Walmart gives you 30 days judge😂

[@matty7757]

She let him give a lot of unneeded information 😂

[@alanratay4583]

That judge is gorgeous and cute at the same time. I love the way she used that.

[@richardm5540]

What a spoiled man ! Even Judge Marilyn played into his con until the end.

[@florcanela49]

Every time I ordered glasses, I had to pay 100%. There is no changing your mind, give me my money back in ordering glasses! This guy doesn't get it! 😮

[@keithkemp3008]

THIS IS ONE OF THOSE CASES WHERE HE'S NEVER GONNA HEAR WHAT THE JUDGE IS SAYING !!

[@righttoouropinionthanks4710]

Ugh! Sooo tired of people that make poor choices then expect others to pay for them! This is obviously a case of “buyers remorse” period!!

[@bovinityleak2066]

The squeaky wheel almost got the (undeserved) grease….. then turned it down from stupidity and/or pride! Wow 😯 😂

[@jamesruff361]

I LOVE this judge :)

[@vitalee2585]

This is why people of a certain need to not be in charge of themselves because he still needs glasses

[@jb3702]

His reasoning is sooo poor.

[@rahmah615]

He is just a stubborn OLD MAN! Very annoying!

[@thale6945]

EXACTLY

[@nenenord6320]

I love claims small😂

[@ralphtime]

😂 that man was off n the head. Not just the eyes

[@mamacindyrogofsky495]

He can't get a refund. It's already been made to your vision requirements. How can defendant resell them?😂

[@nhammon2]

So he still has to go somewhere else and pay for reading glasses! 🤦🏾‍♀️

[@LivingforJesusaGodisGood74]

Yes Doug. Let's make a deal!

[@carbonhornet1]

This guy was a character straight out of Sanford and son. I was waiting for fred to come out and say " you big dummy!"

[@marymarysmarket3508]

Lol

[@howardhudson9592]

Love the way JM “advises “ the defendant

[@affirmafformattract]

Pride comes before a fall.

[@CassandraReneeXOXO]

The plaintiff is old and stubborn, and now he’s gonna pay for reading glasses somewhere else….just ridiculous!

[@glenngatlin8475]

Plaintiff had a long rehearsed story.😮

[@newyorknewyork9790]

Do you want nothing? Or do you want glasses? 😂make the defendant win your honor. I just came to visit you. Now the guy will get more costumers 😂

[@TheG00fytwin]

This plaintiff had pride big enough to circulate the WHOLE circumference of earth… 40 times

[@chrisdoherty6847]

You get nothing! You loose sir! Good day!!!

[@Nan-59]

Awww. What a nice defendant.❤❤❤. Too bad the plaintive didn’t understand a thing.

[@natashadaniels4599]

That man is stubborn

[@redgurl60]

That cute doctor got him to have the surgery. HE should have just took the hit quietly. lol

[@kyliemarie6386]

Although I don’t agree with the plaintiff, legally speaking wouldn’t he be entitled to get 70-50% of his money back based on the store policy which says that a person will lose their 30-50% deposit if they change their mind/cancel? The judge is the one who pointed that out, so why wouldn’t she have a curtain number 3 or just stick to the store policy?

[@inspyr9]

I think because a new agreement was reached and the judge went with that.

[@tattooguy973]

​@@inspyr9yup especially since he still needs glasses to read.

[@cynthiavaldez7127]

You know that's a good point. 🤔 And to answer inspyr9, verbal contracts can't override a written contract. I'm honestly kinda surprised by this outcome. Unless I'm missing something LEGALLY. P.S. I'm still glad the plaintiff left with nothing.

[@osomartinez]

@@cynthiavaldez7127 the plaintiff and defendant both agreed to a new contract. i will not sue if you do the work. the plaintiff sued and breached the new contract. the judge was just trying to get a fair resolution and the plaintiff is just too stubborn

[@patriciasaxon1823]

What a stubborn dummy, he didn't rob anyone. Now he is out twice like a jacka%#

[@AlibraMentality]

Not the brightest crayon in the box

[@Tee33465]

Classic tale of the stubborn old man

[@lisaparrey1343]

I understood it that he paid $240 for the lenses and frames, then all the squabble so the shop offers a credit and to put new lenses for 2nd prescription in his existing frames. So he should get a refund for the frames or if there was never going to be frames then he should get refund for above and beyond the 50% of the full price for which he paid 90% of.

[@joeybiden7755]

I agree. Policy says deposit up to 50%. He should have got a refund for the amount he paid over the 50%

[@diamondstarr3392]

@@joeybiden7755 in the eyes of the law it is your choice if you over pay the down payment, doesnt mean your entitled to the extra back.

[@mandawood9756]

Wow. I didn’t know Nipsey Russell was still alive and on the people’s court!

[@bluebutterfly244]

It's sad. I think the defendant really wanted to help the plaintiff. He wasn't happy to have "won". Sad all the way around. Wish them both the best.

[@dianedobson1104]

The question is when did he cancel? If it was cancelled the next day and it wasn’t a one day shop then you know they haven’t been made yet. BUT it was 5 days later so no go.