Relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism

[@ansh_u_r]

Buddhism is logic of Hinduism and Hinduism is vibrancy of Buddhism.

[@chetanhmeshram]

Buddhism is not a religion..........and Buddha is not the God..........but it is about attaining the supreme human within you. That is the toughest thing to attain. Being the true You.

[@KZ-cd1hg]

@Raven Brahma is just like a idiot in in pali Canon,he just like a normal dumb human who don't know anything and he need budhha's teaching

[@rahulezhava98]

@@KZ-cd1hg you are idiot have you heard the name Mahadev

[@shivendias9602]

@@KZ-cd1hg Bro calm down he is still a deva who has done many meritious actions. Brahma is worthy of worship even in Buddhism

[@swapanbarua8121]

Buddha is teacher of all human and god.

[@furtivedolus2504]

The "Hinduism" of Buddha's day was probably QUITE different that what we have today.

[@maverickkanav]

Yepp 180 degree different

[@usc4405]

It got thrgh hands of so many Westerners and Abrahamic cultures.

[@mitchjames9350]

It was controlled by the priests and their politics, they controlled the narrative even when the vedas allowed spiritual freedom that the priests denied.

[@deepsahay1080]

I also respect and love Gautam Buddha

[@drsansha]

"Where Religion ends, Spirituality begins" Babu Ji maharaj said

[@stanzingonbo3936]

Wow absolutely amazing Sir.... You absolutely right. Some people played a very smart trick saying Buddha is an avatar of Vishnu just to suppress Buddhism.... Shame on those people

[@abhishek.chakraborty]

Why do you take it as a way to 'suppress' Buddhism ? Something is said to be suppressed if it is prevented or forbidden, but what is described in the video is how the philosophy preached by Buddha was respected & included as one of the main paths to Enlightenment in Sanatana Dharma(Hinduism). If that is suppression, I don't know what is encouragement 😐 But, if it is the pride of being separate that is the issue, then I think you need to understand Hinduism is actually not strictly a single religion i.e. it is a collection of a lot of ancient philosophical schools which existed in this land, before outsiders came and called people here Hindus. So, Buddhism has its esteemed place here along with other schools like Dwaita, Advaita, Sankhaya, etc. And, since technically Buddha was born in a Hindu king's (Suddhodana) family, I don't think anyone can claim he can't be considered a Hindu Deity as well.

[@vankayalakameswarasarma1723]

Whenever the rulers who were the patrons of different religions were there,it is obvious that they try to suppress the other ones.It happened all the times. Buddhism in India diminished because of the monastery living of monks and less migratory policy.Islamic rulers killed all the Buddhist monks in monastery.

[@konarkroynew9152]

You dont know facts

[@skmutsuddi]

@@vankayalakameswarasarma1723, ....After 500 years of mahaparinibbana of Goutam Buddha, His teachings were gradually doped with impurities. Eventually, the originality of the Teachings was lost in India and so the results. At that time, different Rulers were instigated by the crooked Brahmin Leaders to subdue Buddhism. Right from Gupta Dynasty to Maharaj Shashank of Bengal the trend was the same. Maharaj Shashank even got uprooted the Bodhi Tree and installed Shiva Linga in Bodh Gaya Temple. Lastly, Sultan Bakhtiar Khilji burnt down the Nalanda University.

[@atul1024]

Explore concept of avatar,,you cant separate Buddha from Indic traditions coz of pluralism

[@KuchBhi24211]

Buddha never addressed anything about God , Instead when Someone asked him about God then he used to say " You are flanked with poisonous arrow , while you are in pain you are debating about 'what this arrow made of ?' ' who has shot it ? ' what is the source of this ? ', instead of pulling it out of your body " Buddha means to say that instead of solving your immediate problem your are fighting over something which is not certain.

[@aviralsharma7744]

you know what he was straight..he said to focus on what you have what you suffer rather than who is creating it.. I mean if you see your suffering as you created and you will end it then definitely you will move ahead. But if you keep blaming to something you might not experience..he was talking about those maximum people who haven't realised the ultimate or have felt it He just meant you should not waste your life but trust me he was NOT THE ONLY ONE to say it sanatan dharma had lots of schools and was messed up and already had it in the crux. . hence he gave a straight path to bring back people to reality not to oppose what were they doing his methods weren't agnostic or atheist as people say. He said that everything has an end okay but you are self capable enough to do that sankhya darshan says it as well of sanatan dharma but the difference is adi shankaracharya said it who will judge about it ? who will decide..is there a parameter?? Everything is associated..its dual in nature you sow so you reap but what is the cause and who will start and end it..it will always go on there is no end hence similar fashion.. buddhism sadly had limited answers and it went down you know no philosophy is wrong the thing is people take it wrong and get entangled in stories alone every dharma is scientific..I believe upanishad or vedanta or bhagwat gita is alone enough to tackle every ideology, religion or sect

[@Nikko_Hogetsu_108]

🙏🏻🪷 Living in California with the people of India in my heart. Grateful for the teachings… Be well and happy! With palms together, Nikko

[@chanakyaniti2883]

Namah shivaay Namo Buddhay

[@laygnassangyal3847]

Jai shri ram namo buddha

[@TSC-hr7ir]

LORD BUDDHA I LOVE YOU

[@sonamtshering194]

The Buddha was not against Hinduism, but the corruption in Hinduism

[@2sumu]

What were the corruptions?

[@satyamindnectar7052]

@@2sumu Brahmin unrealistic rituals, orthodox Brahmins,varna system corruption, and many more...

[@yashghetia6386]

The Brahmins

[@rock5989]

@@2sumu superstitions,idolatry, discrimination based on varna,cast,gender.

[@dangerousblogger5346]

@@rock5989 Idoletary!!? Do you know actually it's essense

[@harimakani2316]

Abandoning buddhism completely was the mistake of india

[@TharsyanJaderuby]

Couldn't agree more, I wish Buddhism was alive and embraced the same way Hinduism does now in India. And also for Hindus embrace Buddha's teachings more.

[@suraaj8729]

People may have abandoned Buddhism but they didn't abandoned Buddha.

[@satyamindnectar7052]

@@TharsyanJaderuby Hindu didn't even follow Hindu philosophy they r simpluly worshippers

[@ansh_u_r]

Everybody in India is Buddhist even Muslims but because of different political forces they act in different religious ideological way.Principle of Buddhism is hard installed in the society and it is never be replaced.

[@skmutsuddi]

By only reading or practising Vedic culture, no Buddha is produced so far. .... He never asked to just believe his doctrine, but come and see the outcome on your own. He asked to work ardently for your own salvation. His Doctrine is extremely focused and result-oriented and absolutely free from any kind of imagination or falsehood. In his time about 10000 People ( right from Higher to lower caste) were benefitted from his teachings and achieved Arhathood. His standpoint is completely different from other conventional Beliefs.

[@LordByron778]

Basically, Hinduism stifled buddhism in its friendly embrace 😭

[@tenzind4175]

very true sir,,,

[@2sumu]

Conclusion: The purpose of inclusivity of Hinduism was to suppress teachings of Budha and claim victory for Hinduism by Adi Shankara

[@himanshudubey7]

thanks mr. lakhani

[@2sumu]

6:19: Budha: 'no god'. Shankara: 'you are god'

[@Atheist-v9v]

Adi Shankaracharya was not a cryptobuddhist. He had no concerns about the physical realm and was more focussed on the metaphysical realm. You know what such gurus are called? India is full of such gurus..

[@usc4405]

HUGE HUGE message that can kill all violence that is around in name of book and prophet

[@jarkarragsap9034]

buddhism, Hinduism are ways of life full of philoshopy

[@lnbartstudio2713]

Very nice. Even the " secular buddhists " can't finish the job. Use a thorn to remove a thorn and then throw both of the thorns away.

[@ratanashifu]

As to Advaita that would be proposed by both Hinduïsm (Advaita Vedanta) and Buddhism: they are not the same. Advaita (A..-Vedanta) states that one should reach unity with the One, whatever the One may be. Buddhism says there is no One, therefore reaching unity is a non-issue, it cannot be spoken of, there was non-division from the earliest start. We find this most explicitly in the early Mahayanistic Lankavatara Sutra where the issue is discussed at length, possibly as result of philosophical attacks from Advaita (A..-vedanta) scholars in the south of India.

[@skmutsuddi]

Buddha's Doctrine is for practising, not studying only. By doing so, even illiterate persons were liberated.

[@rickschrager]

Why do people divide Buddhism from Hinduism? Buddhism is a form of Hinduism both geoculturally and philosophically. To divide them is the same as saying Shaivism or Vedanta and its many schools are something different than Hinduism. One would not say that Judaism, the Islamic faiths or Christianity are not Abrahamic religious. One cannot say that Buddhism, Jainism or Sikhism are not Hindu religions.

[@LobsangTsering-xb8wc]

In Buddhism there is no caste system, everyone is equal in eyes of the Buddha.

[@sreenivasannaidu]

Excellent Explanation, Enjoyed it.

[@2sumu]

4:58 I did not catch a word or two here, someone help me fill in the blanks "that's why Buddhism is not considered to be ____ ____ accept the authority of the Vedas"

[@REDnBLACKnRED]

"that's why Buddhism is not considered to be an Indic religion because they (Buddists) don't accept the authority of the Vedas" is what he said I believe. Generally speaking though any religion that's born in the Indian subcontinent is considered an Indic religion so perhaps he meant Dharmic or Vedic. These terms are often used interchangeably.

[@Behappy11231]

Buddha can also be a Guru , who decided to "not to accept ritual or act or performance of some one who acts as mediator between you and an idol ".He felt that " Personal experience by everyone must be very important "-After Buddha , Hinduism accepted this and grew steadily to this date . That is why modern Gurus like Sadguru adopt the same route of Buddha .May be why Buddha decided to use Bali instead of sanskrit could only to make common man believe in him by de sanskritising his teachings. No doubt Sanskrit usage dwindled and spread of Buddhism expanded through continents !!!!!.

[@mmore242]

Jay Lakhani sadly did not encounter Eastern Orthodox Christians because we don’t idolize the Bible like he says and our faith is experiential. Jesus Christ not only fulfill the needs of one life time but he conquered man’s greatest tyrant, death. He grants people of all lifetimes Eternal Life and Salvation. I use to follow Jay Lakhani’s teachings until the guru of gurus found and called me to seek Him. Praise be to Lord Jesus Christ Son of God!

[@HimanshuSingh-wh1dd]

Bhudhism, Aryanism,Hinduism, jainism all are same.

[@guybangkok]

Yes. All are heretic paganism.

[@KZ-cd1hg]

@@guybangkok hhahaha budhhism is different

[@KZ-cd1hg]

Budhism is a different religion

[@NikhchansGaming]

WTF is Aryanism?

@@KZ-cd1hg lol never. Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism.. are almost same

[@ranferchristian8050]

Sir, 1. why did Buddha rejected existence of God? Didn't he say "There is NO God"? That means he rejected Hinduism completely. Isn't it?

[@KuchBhi24211]

Buddha never denied the existence of God he just preferred to address ' the most immediate problems of Human suffering ' because that is the certain and real problem of world not The existence God.

[@sureshnair9427]

Buddha did not make any reference either way of a creator god - - very much like some/most of the other indic philosophies - among the indic philosophies only purva mimansa talks specifically of a creator god

[@amol9616113945]

hindusam is distorted buddhisam in India and then aquired the belongings of buddhisam and become great.

[@davidbrainerd1520]

That Buddha said there is no God is a Jewish myth.

[@KZ-cd1hg]

@Raven budhha rejected God,Brahma I just like a normal human in pali Canon he is not a powerfull god like in hindusm

[@TheCaptain0117]

Sir ur views hv evolved the understand of our religion... I know u will feel happy to hear this :)

[@amritrajsingh655]

Buddha is 9th avatar of Vishnu

[@laygnassangyal3847]

Yep

[@saiprabhasvarma5349]

okay if you tell buddha is ninth avatar why won't you pray him daily if you claim buddha pray for him man,go to Buddhist temple,do you even know when is buddha Purnima no just blindly follows everyone without proper research if you are smart do some proper research

[@spidylov3382]

@@saiprabhasvarma5349 yes I used to go in Buddha temple even at my home Buddha's idol is with God's We sanatani already following Buddha teaching without converting in Buddhism even Buddha didn't made any religion but he was a spiritual teacher who also followed some indian philosophy Like Dharma,Atman,peace,ahimsa,moksha, karma, Yog, mediation, even atheism , etc Buddha name is known as great spiritual teacher in sanskrit 🙏🏻 Buddha was not a religious people he was a teacher and his followers made his teachings a religion 😭 so sad Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism , and Hinduism is the branch of same tree starts with dharma All are sects like vaishnav and shavism in Hinduism 🙏🏻

[@tsshisonam5686]

hindu believe atma means not changing only one freedom that is Buddhism not believe....

[@pratikmohapatra2348]

Please do research about buddha and krisna both are same but the way they are defining the truth is different

[@ankitarani2868]

@@pratikmohapatra2348 they are not same . Krishna's ideology and philosophy is useful for every moment. He is a god who showed his devine figure to arjun, u can't compare him with a human being. Krishna was a god in human.

[@tenzinfreedom2027]

M a Buddhist but i dont consider as a hindu which feed on discrimination n inequality whiich is against the basic principle of Buddhism n buddha teaching..so dont try to assimilate buddha teaching into Hinduism where he n his followers face discrimination n persecution..

[@dorjerabten]

Now I understand what does crypto means. Because in Buddhism such language are not used. And when I see some quote of Sankaracharya , he uses the same quote Buddhas teaches that is clever, but he doesn’t follow Buddha dharma as his path. What can be more stupid than these .

[@arzusingh6550]

aww so sharp yet cute n on point 👌👌👌👌🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@2sumu]

5:49 "fighting the idea that Budha left behind"

[@2sumu]

7:00 So, Adi Shankara, the crypto Budhist, made Budha a god for Shankara's own purposes and succeeded!

[@alexcordero6672]

Oh, I get it and can explain it now. So, God is essentially a "non-issue." God's state in your mind is irrelevant to your suffering--which pervades your living experience. Believe in God, or not--who cares... Suffering must still be addressed weather God is real or not. I have been asked, "So, as a Buddhist, do you believe in God?" My answer can now firmly be, "that's irrelevant, it's suffering we need to address weather God is causing it or not."

[@fanaticslayer7523]

Early Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism gave birth to Early Vedanta, Bhagvad Gita, Patanjali's Yoga Sutra, Advaita Vedanta, Ramayana, Idol Worshipping, Bij Mantras. #fact

[@dawnfm00]

Madhav Sharma Wrong, Jataka dates back to 6th Century B.C. whereas Puranas dates back to 1st Century B.C till 5 Century A.D.

[@TheShree909]

Buddhism never gave rise to the upanishads. It is the other way around.

[@humanbeing2722]

watch this kzbin.info/www/bejne/iHiqpKFopdR4iqM

[@shubham_SS]

Go read the Pre Gautama/Buddism Upanishads.

[@Paramasaugata]

110% true brother

[@TenzinDorjee]

Funny is thing is that Purana (Ancient writings) are actually New written in our common era

[@rspvarun]

True

[@satyanarayanagangireddy3646]

ఞంఈఈఈఈ

[@shivam673]

What do you mean by that?

[@tenzinfreedom2027]

​@@shivam673if u don't know then go home n make new one to suit today time..

[@amitavabarua5648]

i listen your adi sankara speech. did you know adi sankara and pussamitra sunga parasuram they killed buddhist monk on that time. samrat ashoke built 42000 buddhist bihar built that time. adi sankar destroy all of them. all buddhist compar adi sankar with an evel.

[@rajarshinarayan8777]

Ur history is realy nice to hear, tell me more of ur history

[@jos.3825]

Perhaps you could serve us with your sources about your narration? Thanks!

[@abhishek.chakraborty]

Please provide evidence that Adi Shankaracharya physically destroyed Buddhist texts/monuments. I agree he engaged in numerous debates with Buddhist scholars of his time indeed, and defeated many of them, but that's not the same. Also, don't attribute the physical destruction of most prestigious educational centers in Bihar, chief of them being world-famous Nalanda University, to Shankaracharya, since it was done by the Muslim Emperors (e.g. Khilji).

[@assamese.maharashtrian]

There exists no evidence of Ashoka building 42000 Viharas. The numbers claimed by some fanatic anti-Hindus among Buddhists keeps changing. Some say 42000, some say 84000. Some go as far as saying 8 lakhs. All made up claims. The only source that talks of Ashoka building so many Viharas are the Sri Lankan Pali-Sinhalese hybrid legendary texts like Dipavamsa and Mahavamsa. Even the Ashokavadana written by Taranath doesn't give such a big number. Ashoka may have built hundreds of Viharas for sure... but 42000 is too big a number, and if this claim is even assumed to be true... then it would be DISASTROUS FOR THE ECONOMY at that time. Adi Shankara never killed any Buddhist. It's like saying Gautama Buddha and Ashoka killed all Ajivikas, Charvakas and other extinct Sramana sects just because they were philosophical rivals. Btw, Ashoka did kill Jains and Ajivikas as per the Buddhist legends themselves. Parshurama? ..? Pushyamitra... yes he killed many Buddhist monks... and destroyed Viharas because of Nationalist reasons. Brihadratha Mourya, the last Mouryan emperor, was a Jain and a feeble minded unpopular king, unlike his Jain ancestor the Great Chandragupta Mourya. So Pushyamitra had to kill him in front of the entire Magadha Army, and all soldiers supported Pushyamitra! This occured because it was an emergency. The Greek King Demetrius (Dhammamitra) had invaded Northern India and had reached upto Mathura. Brihadratha didn't have the guts to counter any invaders, and the Buddhists, especially monks, were actually supporting the Greek invader just because he was a Buddhist and the Indian king was a Jain, with his commander-in-chief being a Hindu. So Pushyamitra had to kill the Buddhist traitors of his times, for protecting the nation. After the conflict was over, there is evidence of inscriptions at Sanchi Stupa, where Pushyamitra Shunga has been given credit for renovating the Stupa. This proves that the Shungas weren't Brahminical religious fanatics.

[@Deekumar]

prove it, I know you can't so don't say something you can't prove

[@atul1024]

Let me say something about this books business.........

[@taidelek9994]

Thanks for clarifying my doubt over Hinduism and Buddhism. I was baffle to hear Sadhguru saying Buddha was a small aspects of Shiva. 🙏

[@davidbrainerd1520]

Its just a modern Jewish legend that Buddha said there is no God. Read the Pali canon, and he's talking about God, including that Brahma talked him into teaching the dharma when after he reached enlightenment he was too depressed to teach it, thinking everyone would be too stupid to understand the dharma, and Brahma convinced him otherwise. The Western Jewish Buddhists have convinced everyone of a lie that Buddha said things he never said, and its easy to see they're liars by just reading.

[@vankayalakameswarasarma1723]

Hinduism has similar concept,where the saints & the people who attained heaven, worship the god and the eternal superpower is considered as the most intelligent being.

[@nareshgb1]

very well done Jews then :)):)

[@selfbosting3263]

Sir, modern Hinduism is just consolation and claiming as a old religion but it is nothing just bring back of Buddhism from backdoor by Adi Shankara as a ideology only but Shankara himself is not enlightened due to his subtile ego of brahmin cast and superpime self ???

[@umeshregmi1102]

Let us not forget Buddha was born in Nepal

[@sunilbhatt7365]

Bro no doubt , Siddhartha Gautama was born in Nepal, but he became Buddha in India. We should not egoistic about it.

[@KZ-cd1hg]

I'm Indian and yeah he born in Nepal

[@REDnBLACKnRED]

Nepal and India both did not exist during this time, and for a long time after this. This is a very stupid statement. Buddha was born in the Indian subcontinent, which was largely, philosophically aligned.

[@tenzinfreedom2027]

It's true n he was born in shakya n he just came here to India to piss off Indian 😮😮😮

[@nettinetti8465]

Adi Sancaracarya vs Hindu Buddhists of Mahayana schools of thought = Sancaracarya won, Buddhism ousted of India BUT IF Adi Sancaracarya vs Siddharta Gautama = Siddhartha would win, Sancaracarya ousted WHY The Buddhism that Sancaracarya struggled with was not the original teachings of the Buddha. It was the Mahayana schools of thought. That is why Advaita Vedanta has a lot like in Buddhism (Mahayana) such as mind/consciousness only of Yogacara school of thought of Buddhism. If it was the Hinayana school of Buddhism, Sancaracharya would have failed.

[@aviralsharma7744]

it's good as an imagination dear but he advocated on real budhhist teachings.. you should read about him and buddhist authentic teachings as well.. please there is no war or some issue .. it's okay.. it's always better to have something better for humanity right !! buddh'ism' had enough..hence again sanatan dharma where sanatan means noend rises up again

[@2sumu]

Please tell more with a documentation or two!

[@apsingh420aps]

Thanks for putting simply love it

[@stevenhunter3345]

The Buddha was NOT an Advaitin. First of all, there was no Advaita at the time of the Buddha. During his time, he was arguing against the Brahminical religion of the Vedas. He maintained certain Vedic principles such as karma, rebirth, and samsara, but he was a great reformer of the Indian religious system. Mahavira, the founder of Jainism, was another great reformer. And the Hindu Dharma that emerged after Buddhism was quite distinct from the Vedic ritualism of the preceding epoch.

[@assamese.maharashtrian]

There was nothing called "Brahmanism" then. The literal translation of Brahmanism would be Brahmana Dharma-- and there was no official, organized or even unorganized religion with such a name. Religion was just called Dharma, and it was denoted by the names of the teachers or the traditions of teachers or deities important. The best word to denote it was Arya Dharma, and everyone including the Buddha considered their discovered interpretation of Dharma as being "Arya" in nature. Also, Vedic ritualism is an incomplete term. The Vedic Dharma was waaay beyond ritualism. Rituals were just celebrations , and by the time of the Buddha, the Vedic religion in it's pure form had almost died of, at least in the regions where the Buddha travelled, i.e. modern day UP, Bihar and Terai. It was "Vamamarga" that was prevalent. Calling the Vedism as ritualistic is equivalent to calling Buddhism nihilistic. I agree, that calling the Buddha an Advaitin or a Vedantist is a biased view which many Advaita Vedantic Hindus have. But the concept exists in the Vedas. The claim of Hindu Dharma being post-Buddhistic doesn't even make much sense. If you mean the coining of the term by the Zoroastrians, who also considered their religion as Arya and Den (equivalent to Dharma), then the term was coined by Darius around the time of the Buddha himself (500 BCE). If you mean the Puranic terms, then still your statement is incomplete. The Puranas in a shorter form already existed among the masses as folklore. Its possible that the compilation of the Puranas as scriptures happened after the Buddha, during the times of the Guptas, but they still had roots in folklore and local legends. It was all refined and reformed continuation, with a lot of diversity. Just like the Japanese native religion of Shinto or the Tibetan native religion of Bon.

[@suraaj8729]

Lol....plz educate urself first.....advaita existed before Buddhism.....but adi shankaracrya popularized it later

[@TheGuroLOLITA]

Sir u r enlightened

[@lucifertv6377]

Transforming318 😂😂😂😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@nayanmalig]

Great lecture

[@saiprabhasvarma5349]

hello sir we know the politics that you are playing do you think we are what haa

[@shivangihere9141]

No politics. He has good knowledge of Upanishads and Buddhism. Also it doesn't matter how the Truth reaches you , either by Budhha or Upanishads. Truth matters.

[@aksh2812]

People are pathetically linking Buddhism and Hinduism. Both are different religions. 1. Hinduism has propaganda classes like Brahman Kshatriya vaishya shudras on the basis of birth that are artificial. Buddhism doesn't make such distinctions. However, for advanced disciples of Buddhism, abhi dhamma pitak exists. Buddhism doesn't prescribe different punishments and treatments for different classes as existing in the manusmriti of Hindus . Buddhism treats people equally. 2. Buddha never said he was God. In fact , the concept of God is alien to Buddhists . Hindus have 33 "koti" Gods. 3. Buddhism doesn't show you the fear of hell or the greed for heaven. Hinduism is riddled with the propaganda of heaven and hell which NASA couldn't prove . 4. Hindus don't worship Buddha . In fact, most of the Hindus will worship Vishnu , Rama , Krishna etc. It is very rare to find Hindus worshipping Buddha . Their homes don't contain Buddha's idols. 5. Hinduism is based on propaganda shastras that were written by a bunch of extremely smart , but cunning people. There is not one book but many, that contain propaganda against the shudras . Ramayana s shambhuk vadh and Mahabharata sut putra Karna, and Eklavya are just a few of the examples. However, Buddhism gave tripitakas( teachings of Buddha ) and jataka stories ( various births of Buddha, which are just stories , not literal births of Buddha, written by his disciples). 6. One cannot be a Hindu without having a firm belief in Sanatana shastras( Vedas , upnishads, smritis etc ) . However, one can be a Buddhist without having a belief in jataka stories and tripitaka. A Hindu holds his sanatana Dharma shastras as sacrosanct irrespective of the amount of fraud it contains . A Buddhist doesn't need to hold tripitakas and jataka stories as sacrosanct. He is free to reject them if something repugnant is found in them. 7. For Hindus, Vedas are the ultimate books, eternal, without beginning and without end. Nothing is more correct than the Vedas . Vedas cannot be improved or modified. However for Buddhists , tripitakas are not the ultimate books. According to Buddha's teachings, rules may be changed that morally fit best to the situations. In fact, constant improvement forms the basis of Buddhism. The concept of kaizen is borrowed from Buddhism, which is used by the companies worldwide. 8. Hinduism believes that if a person doesn't do his duty as per his / her Varna , he will take rebirth as some animal like pig / worm etc. The concept of rebirth has been utilised to frighten people to do their jobs. However, Buddhism doesn't believe in the version of rebirth as explained in Hinduism. According to Buddhism, rebirth is chemical recycling of elements. So , an organism composed of carbon , hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen etc will take rebirth in another organism in the form of some other compound , according to Buddhism. But a man will become a pig in the next birth is not propounded by Buddhism. 9 . Buddhism doesn't show you the fear of God or fear of hell, whereas the Purana are rife with examples of heaven and hell.

[@laxmikesharwani8993]

Great concept!!! But ,Does not hold true! Surrender to God! Is only principle in Hinduism!!! Hinduism doesn't make it mandatory to follow holy scriptures! It's necessary to crave for God! To surrender your self to God! But mind that, God is not superior! Love him as you loved one! Your mother or father or brother or son or daughter or husband or wife! As your friend! And love him! All his goodness will enter in you! Don't think that's horrible! Or disease! In Hinduism, God stands for symbol of 'set of principles to live a greater life!! He is symbol of happiness,love!!!Bliss!!! Again, mind it ! Hinduism does not has any rules to follow! Krishna himself tells, Arjun, forget everything,and just surrender yourself to me!

[@ankitarani2868]

U have mistakenly read Hinduism in place of any abrahmic religion otherwise no one will spread such unwanted messages about hinduism. Hinduism has no such concept of heaven and hell which u r vomiting. Vishwamitra was a kshatriya at first but he used to be called a Brahmarshi after a long austerity bcoz ho hinduism identifies one on the basis of karmA same was the case with asmanjas( he is shudra although born in kshatriya Lineage, ancestor of lord Rama), same was with valmiki rishi also. Val iki ramayan has story till his coronation only. No one knows who has written Uttar Ramayan which has story about subrak Sudra. Neither kamban nor tulsidas made this controversial Uttar Ramayan as the part of their writings. U believe subrak but forgot sabri who had attained salvation after being born in Sudra bhill lineage and was praised by lord Rama, it is said that he ate her leftover berries also. If ram was against shudra's right then why he patronised bhilni sabri and how brahmin Matang rishi taught Vedas and austerity to sabri.read gita and now our lord Krishna helps someone to reach his lord whom someone worships he preaches Arjuna about freedom of worship. Vedas is science not a concept of crooked theory which u r vomiting rest is on u read from which source. Vedas helpful for every moment and period. Your all knowledge shows jealousy towards hinduism

[@ashutoshsharma-qk8yx]

And said by an ambedkarite

[@2sumu]

@@ankitarani2868 any documentation for what you say?

[@2sumu]

Akshay Bagde you need expand a little more with a documentation of two

[@Sarthi97]

Buddhism is another sub part of Hindu culture. Buddhist people are worshipping to Hindu philosopher as a God. Buddhism is same as Vaishnav or Shaiva panth.

[@KZ-cd1hg]

Hahaha you're really funny hindoo Budhism is a different from hindusm

[@manjunathareddy6548]

@@KZ-cd1hg budha is close to the hearts of hindus as much as he is budhists. Budha is budha. But the basic core values are same.

[@shivamgaur3400]

@@KZ-cd1hg maybe different but not separated

[@suraaj8729]

@@KZ-cd1hg Hinduism n Buddhism r two sides of same coin

[@REDnBLACKnRED]

@@suraaj8729 They're certainly different coins but made of the same metal

[@farazahmad7229]

Hinduism is copy paste of Vajrayana Buddhism

[@untrainedytbr2454]

Pure nonsense language of explaining lie

[@hunter-z4547]

Buddhism is distilled religion from assivagam .

[@johnmiller5259]

☺️🙏

[@usc4405]

Awsome. 👍🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻