Sigma 24-70mm VS Tamron 28-75mm - Long Term, Multi Copy Review

[@StefanMalloch]

Which one is best for you?

[@osmanlatif9369]

I use tamron and when its all the way zoom its like sensor jumping. I found that 120 fps with 75mm zoom its more knowsable

[@chrisdavies5255]

Great content! Which is best for me? NEITHER! I'm concerned that both had issues! I'm in the market for a zoom to use with my Sony gear as I transition from Nikon DSLR to Sony mirrorless. I bought my Nikon glass in 2007 and haven't had a single issue - zero. After watching your vid, I'm going with the Sony glass - I don't need 3rd party gripes to miss a shot. Thanks bud!

[@haryadiwijaya3304]

after watching your videos.. i go with Sigma... never regret it.. !! i once have 28-75 Tamron and sold it...

[@steviegbcool]

@@haryadiwijaya3304 same gaining that 4ms at the wide angle is so much better no. no more changing lens.

[@p_p]

Tamron is enough honestly for my needs

[@standhd]

Great review as always. I want the Sigma because of the extra reach on the wide angle side. I have the Tamron 70-180 and I love it. You do excellent reviews, always and I look forward to your content. Keep up the good work; you are one of my TOP go to guys for great KZbin vids.

[@StefanMalloch]

Thanks bud. Appreciate you!

[@stephanweiskorn6760]

Excellent video 😮!

[@benjaminthorpe7990]

As a long time watcher, I’d really love to see you go out and do shoots. You have a lot of access to great kit but it’d be awesome to see them in your hands and how you like to use them

[@StefanMalloch]

Coming soon!

[@benjaminthorpe7990]

@@StefanMalloch decent, I’ll look forward to it. For what it’s worth I feel like you deserve more subscribers, so I hope it comes!

[@oehagen]

Commenting for the algorithm 😉 Your channel deserves far more subs! Thanks for delivering such quality content time after time.

[@simonfuller76]

Thanks Stefan for this great comparison and sharing of your long term experiences. Many people compare with a week of experience and hardly any variation in environments which can make or break the choice. I can say for years the Tamron has served me surprisingly well with great contrast, sharpness, af speed and af accuracy for photos. I like the 28mm angle of view but having that extra 4mm means I can avoid taking the 16-35 with me so thats why I will finally get the Sigma and as you keep the Tamron for its strengths in weight and size when that is essential. Also as a working pro having an excellent backup main lens will be great because repairing your one and only main is a nightmare as I've had with Panasonic/Olympus and Canon.

[@I_am_Jordan_K]

I ended up going with the Tamron. The Sigma is slightly better in a few areas where I didn't need slightly better - the optics are so close that I can barely tell the difference, the plastic build is still pretty solid, I don't need buttons and switches, and the lack of 24mm doesn't bother me. What was really important to me was the size, weight, and cost. The Tamron's size makes it more portable and easier to balance on a gimbal, which is actually what I ended up buying with the cash I saved.

[@robertmendes4181]

Hey, can you give an update ? is it good ?

[@Bloodshade]

Glad to see you’re doing well, I was excited to hear your opinion on this matchup (especially considering how Sigma started with bad copies due to quality control issues early on)

[@jamesjackson4264]

Started with? They still out there so beware!!!

[@Bloodshade]

james jackson it’s not as bad, or so I’ve heard from the newer models, there are lots of duds out there though

[@jackwern8685]

Had the Tamron for over a year and with favourable reviews recently for the Sigma I went out and bought ---- a second hand 24-70 Sony GM!! I prefer the Sony to the Tamron in every way but the additional size and weight.

[@jamskof]

solid solid video. great work my friend.

[@Mperrymanstudios]

Sold my Tamron for the Sigma and have been super happy with that decision. Colors are definitely different. While both are amazing the Sigma gives me the look im going for.

[@TimandLauren]

hey michael, what about the sigma colors are better than the tamron?

[@Mperrymanstudios]

LT productions just a personal preference really. Ive made great art with both, in the end the 24mm vs 28mm was too much to give up.

[@TimandLauren]

@@Mperrymanstudios you got anyvideos i can see with it?

[@ZHethans]

I own the sigma as well and am having the dust issue since the very first week! It has been a major annoyance and so far Sigma Malaysia had given the response that it "doesn't affect image quality" and flat out denied any issue with the sealing! At least they are willing to give it a clean that at the expense of my time, energy and money...

[@supertaufiqr]

Same issue with mine. Seems a common occurrence with Sigma 24-70

[@marlinbackup8581]

welp getting the tamron not paying 1,000$ for a camera with a dust problem

[@jimpool6096]

I had the same experience with Tamron a couple of years ago. I had a 24-70 lens for my canon. When it was working it was a great lens but when the focusing problems started it was the worst. I had to send it back to tamron 5 times for focusing issues and each time they said they repaired the lens. Each time I tried it out I still had the same focusing problems. I even sent in sample photos taken with another 24 70 at the same F stop and settings to show how bad is was in focusing. Finally on the 6th time I send it back they finally just replaced the lens for me. Their customer service is the worst I have ever experienced.

[@maddenfan6683]

I appreciate your videos bro, subscribed!

[@StefanMalloch]

Thanks my friend

[@EyeLensWeddingVideography]

looking to upgrade my Tamron and I was thinking about the sigma, I even had the lens in my cart getting ready to buy, but then I came across your video and convince me not to because they are so comparable to the point where it's not even needed.. I'm going to stick with my Tamron.. thank for making this..

[@sandeepraiphotography2111]

I am doing the same. Keeping my tamron as I also have Sigma 16mm (24mm equivalent) for my a6400 which I can use if I need that 24mm. Can’t justify getting a sigma and getting rid of my tamron for a lesser price.

[@foblivio]

I’ve dealt with Amplis only once, for my Laowa. Horrible experience. Not too surprised about your Tamron Canada warranty experience.

[@francissosingindyrcworldga8936]

Great review man. Keep up the good work

[@StefanMalloch]

Thanks my friend

[@steviegbcool]

that 4 mms has killed me a load of times. shooting indoor events is a pain.

[@Mid_Life_Adventurer]

My Sigma is being delivered today for my r4!

[@TVe200]

I would probably miss those 4 mm a lot. Today I have an APS-C camera and a 16-55 lens, I use 16 mm more than any other focal lenght. If your lens is not wide enough it's nothing you can do about it, the 5 extra mm in the long end don't mean much. Still I like the size and price of the Tamron.

[@hangtime6743]

I appreciate the time stamp

[@CaseyHardman]

I haven't had a chance to use the Sigma much, but I had the Tamron 17-28 and 28-75 and found it to be a hassle to switch back and forth when the 28mm just wasn't quite wide enough when doing a little street photography. I've been using Sigma 24, 50, and 85 1.4 primes the past year and absolutely love Sigma's glass quality and look. Want to get into weddings next year and the 24-70 just seems like the perfect lens for that. Also wanted to add that I got the Sigma on sale from B&H last week for $899, so it was a no-brainer for me.

[@greggeis918]

Thanks for the comment. This is exactly what I’ve been wrestling with then 17-28 + 28-70 for two light lenses or 24-70. My existing 24-70 I half my shots at either 24 or 70 more at the 70 but I feel like I’d miss that 24 to exaggerate subjects.

[@gamerguy655]

Great comparison thanks

[@lekkerpruven887]

Missed the focus breathing for video. The Sigma seems to be better there too. Did you notice that?

[@Bearjumper55]

I'm in the process of purchasing a Sony a7iii and can only afford one lens at this time. I'd like to get something a little better than the kit lens Sony offers. At this time it's between the two you reviewed. I live in Alaska and my work takes me to many of the small communities and villages. Mostly I'm looking at documenting the people and life styles in these remote areas. I'm leaning to the Sigma. Is there another zoom lens I should consider in the same price range as either of these? Really like the video, thank you!

[@carlosbravofotografia]

Good Review but I have a question, which is faster in autofocus speed Sigma 24 - 70mm vs Tamron 28 75 mm for video quick shots

[@raoulmbogningphotography9851]

Sigma of course

[@Hatvocate]

I was almost expecting “deez nutz” to follow DN

[@TimandLauren]

okay stefan, i had to do a thorough test for myself, i ordered both lenses and had them for the past weekend dust - the sigma and tamron were both fine, no dust issues, if any specs were on them, they were on both sharpness - the tamron is softer at the 75mm compared to the sigma at 70mm, the sigma was sharper in the corners as well color- the tamron rendered color with more red tones compared to the sigma. This was pleasant at first but in different lighting conditions, the tamron's color balance was hit or miss compared to the consistent sigma sigma just looked better in both photo and video in sharpness, performance and overall feel

[@StefanMalloch]

I like that you do your own tests.

[@TimandLauren]

@@StefanMalloch thanks dude! i just had to see it for myself man

[@Linealo]

Just two days ago picked up a new! Tamron for 550€ (regular price is around 700€+) and I'm happy (€ is always with tax included). The Sigma might have an edge in some things like buttons or sharpness, but the Tamron is already so sharp that it's almost to much for my taste when doing portrait. The lens flare and such is also preferred on the Tamron imo, because I actually like to have these in my image. The suppressed flare of the Sigma is often way more distracting than just having a confident, controlled flare and in this case sometimes even more than in the Tamron.

[@sudheeshsridhar7052]

Good observation. From where did you get the tamron??

[@dmisha5437]

Man, for your 24 mm vs 28mm comparison you used the same shot

[@mcwaffles121593]

See this kills me inside... 24mm is my favorite focal length to shoot with, but living in South Florida I'm terrified of humidity destroying the sigma

[@kressiv]

Watch Jason Vong's video of this lens. He took it out in the pouring rain for two hours and it was fine afterwards

[@jostalking]

love the channel - I have a ridiculous question - the map graphic that you used to show that the Sigma Lens was sent to you across the United States, how did you do that?

[@StefanMalloch]

Google maps 😉

[@joshs7642]

That was across Canada!

[@lesliesharpe4915]

Awesome video!!

[@StefanMalloch]

Thanks for the visit

[@RoshenNirmal]

Hi Stefan. Could you review Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD?

[@tomirwinphoto]

Had one and sent it back. F/6.3 is too slow on the long end for anything but bright light, it has an etched look with hard bokeh and lacks the “magic” of an f/2.8. The Tamron 70-18- f/2.8 delivers the look and performance I much prefer. Before it was released I used the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 for Canon with a Sigma Canon-to-Sony MC-11 adapter.

[@StefanMalloch]

I will try!

[@ChoicesHabitsAttitudeLuck]

Gentec is the one handling also for Sony Zeiss lenses here in Canada. It took them 2 months to return my lens. The problem is the parts

[@queeniuli]

Great review as always. What about the dust that has been reported by so many people in the Sigma lenses? It has been a major turn off for me to find out about this when I was so close to buying them 😭 Now I don't know which lenses to buy because the GM is definitely too expensive for me and the Tamron seems not to be the best. And I want the 2.8 f stop.

[@StefanMalloch]

Dust is an issue with the Sigma but is mostly cosmetic. Probably wont effect IQ but you have to wonder what else is getting in. It does bug me.

[@queeniuli]

Thanks so much for your reply. Do you know if its an issue with all the Sigma or with this particular one? Keep up with the excellent reviews that you're making. I'm always checking your videos before purchasing something. ❤️

[@dariusle23]

Just picked up a 24-70 GM for $1400 from a friend. Still brand new and doesnt have any use marks. Idk if it is a good investment

[@p_p]

thanks

[@nesseaquest4835]

Will sigma warranty clean that dust off the lens?

[@r.powell2351]

So I've been agonizing over this choice for about a month now. And to be honest, I was leaning towards the Tamron. But given the unacceptable, if not downright awful customer service experience you had with Tamron, I'm definitely going with the Sigma. Wish I had found this review earlier--it would have saved me a whole lot of time.

I love this... at the end ill tell you which one is the best. You get to the end, "the best one is the best one FOR YOU!" 🙄

[@StefanMalloch]

Best is subjective. My needs are different from yours so its just my experience with both. Hope it helped anyways

[@stanleeger4711]

I'm not seeing any "clinical" vs. "natural" bokeh difference in this video. It's hard to tell when the backgrounds are totally different, such as in the dog photos.

[@ronaldt3422]

3:31 hold on, aren't both the same image????

[@Blue172]

Hi Stefan, I’ve now watched this video 4 times, I’ve just sold my Sony 24-105mm f/4, I was going to purchase the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 Art “but” now there’s a new kid on the block the Samyang/Rokinon 24-70mm f/2.8. Do you have any plans on doing a comparison between the Sigma and Samyang? Please help me out, Regards William

[@martin9410]

Sometimes the quality control for Samyang isn't as good whereas Sigma really stands behind their product with good customer service, but you never know...the Samyang might be great and last a long time.

[@Blue172]

@@martin9410 Thanks Martin, I actually ordered the Sigma 2-days ago.

[@martin9410]

@@Blue172 I ordered it yesterday. I have the Tamron 28-75, but was really missing those extra 4mm on the wide side for event work. When indoors, you can only back up so far. Plus, I just think the Sigma has a more pro build for what I do. I have more compact lenses for personal travel. I think we made a good purchase. Plus, the newer Sigma lens don't have the same dust issue.

[@TimandLauren]

hey stefan, could it be that you just received a bad copy of the sigma lens with the dust getting in? alot of reviews of others with the sigma said they never had dust in theirs also..other reviewrs said that there was little distortion with the sigma and more than the tamron

[@StefanMalloch]

Lots of reporting's of dust. Like a lot! Some distortion at wider focal lengths is to be expected.

[@TimandLauren]

@@StefanMalloch hmm..ive asked people that have had the tamron if they had dust issues too and there are as well im thinking it might be just zoom lenses that have dust concerns

[@mahmutbenzid7825]

I'm a new and i'm going to purchase a new gear for work and I have a question , can i use 50mm focal length on a 24-70 lens ??? Or it has a limited focal length just 24 or 70 ???? Please answer my question

[@StefanMalloch]

Yes that is a zoom lens and 50mm fall in that focal range.

[@mahmutbenzid7825]

@@StefanMalloch thank you so much bro 🙏🌌

[@faisalsheraz8101]

Nice comparison...

[@NafisAhmed73]

Warrenty claim process is pretty bad in my country..so i guess I will pay the high price and get the gm version

[@tamal0167]

Okay 😂

[@AjaySingh-228]

nice lens sir..i like it

[@orszsomborbodo1112]

Hi. Great video but too much ads.

[@StefanMalloch]

Noted thanks

[@r.powell2351]

Bro, if you need to employ ads to keep your awesome videos flowing then I don't mind one bit. Do whatever you need to do to keep your stellar channel up and running :)

[@lowdethan6709]

Would you say the tamron is sharper then the Zeiss 55mm? I'm debating on if I should sell my Zeiss and go for the 28-75

[@StefanMalloch]

No. Its hard for a zoom to compete with a prime in optics and maximum aperture. You'll have to buy both. 😉

[@roozbehbey]

Only a few beat the 55mm.

[@haryadiwijaya3304]

i sell my zeiss 55mm due fringing and CA on the behind focus plane thing... also reflections on water and hi contrast situations

[@Chris-ey7zy]

Zeiss 55 is insanely incredible. Nothing can beat it. I’ve had the Tamron and it’s meh. Nothing beats Zeiss. Sorry. Even Sony Zeiss

[@TheHypeCom]

Still don’t know which one to buy :^)

[@StefanMalloch]

Don't even play.

[@yashwantchowdhary441]

When in such doubt, surely not much to choose between the two optically speaking.... just a shade diff. Go for light weight, no bells n whistles, money matters. Go for Tamron.

[@forkedMuffin]

No I am not sitting here waiting to buy :D I have bought and sold tamron twice, so did with 24-105 also twice. Both very good but not amazing- and surely an amateur who never made a $ from photography cannot live with just very good lenses- they have to be fantastic for that 1 photo I take a year. So I had 2 copies of Sigma and loved it to bits but returned because of CA issues, Now I am sitting waiting for the 3rd Sigma to arrive. Hope it will match the high expectations of a wannabe photographer :D By the way- you deserve a lot more subs for the content you do

[@StefanMalloch]

Haha so true. Thanks my friend

[@forkedMuffin]

@@StefanMalloch and the 3rd sigma arrived. Fantastic lens virtually no CA. Looks like this one's a keeper.

[@solusquinto]

I still don‘t know which to buy ... but ... it‘s actually not on you. It‘s because of Sony‘s 35mm GM ... damn ... that‘s a lens ...

[@albertogvphoto]

Tamron

[@weaverl43]

The side by side examples of 24mm vs 28mm are really identical images. There should be a very noticeable difference in the width of field. I think you’ve made an error.

[@daviddurrani]

Buddy, you can't make up for 4mm by moving your feet a few steps. Unless the subject is under your nose.

[@jaredbellard2777]

might be a situation where you can't compose the shot how you would like due to the environment.

[@Chris-ey7zy]

If your shoot events where things happen fast then you got to change focal length fast.

[@sijilo]

Small 👍

[@zenjitsuman]

You must be kidding. You are not doing a scientific test. You compare 24mm to 28mm, everyone knows its harder to get good results with wider lenses, they have more distortion, vignette and resolution. Same you compared 75mm to 70mm. I am an engineer. I would have set both lenses to the same focal length. I therefore find your results meaningless

[@rollymr]

Agree

[@ganandoor56]

Tamron has this weird ugly bokeh of tree leaves

[@joshs7642]

I've noticed that too. Very busy. It's the only thing I don't like about my Tamron. I also have the 70-180 and its bokeh is much softer.

[@kaadhome5821]

I feel like judging service quality/speed in the middle of a global pandemic is not exactly fair.. I mean ideally if the companies really cared fully unequivocally about their employees there wouldn't have been service available or limited. It's not like a camera repair is really an essential service...

[@StefanMalloch]

I get it. It was more of the communication that got to me. And the lens returned in worse shape than when I sent it. Not ok.

[@ivedigga]

Tamron is a no no & they don’t age well at all

[@noone-yn6in]

both are great. but theres no contest at all here and the extra dollars for the sigma is happily given. 24mm vs 28mm. definitely WAY more useable then the extra 5 on the long end. not sure whos the clown at tamron that decided people all of sudden need to go back to 1999 with that range. weve been using 24-70 for 15 years now. get with it. and 2 other critical things. 1-af/mf switch and 2 fn buttons. extremely important. I dont want to give up a fn button on my camera to switch to mf when tamron was a cheap bastard. and since both in the middle were the same and edges and bokeh favored sigma, there no contest here. build is better with sigma. I like tamron but more then happy to dish out the extra bucks for the sigma. and with 16-28 and 17-28 comparison, which would I buy. none of the 2. the answer easily goes to the sigma art 14-24 dg dn. no comparison. its really a phenominal lens. even besting 16-35 gm. do some research and see for yourself.