Slower with OPF? - TT RS Facelift GPS-Box acceleration🏁

[@cinemaclips5169]

I love this engine

[@SupercarsinGreece]

What an Audi!!! Amazing color too!

[@LIGHTFOOT1963]

What colour is it ?

[@SupercarsinGreece]

LIGHTFOOT1963 Hi my friend! I’m not pretty sure about color’s name.

[@LIGHTFOOT1963]

Supercars in Greece ...... thanks for the quick reply. I have a new RS3 (Nardo Grey) .....wish it was this lovely green colour.

[@AndreasSchmitz11]

Interesting to see the color in the thumbnail in camparison to the real color ;-). But great car anyway, maybe already too perfect.

[@SupercarsinGreece]

@@LIGHTFOOT1963 You're welcome mate!!! Happy miles with your new RS3, nardo grey is one of the best Audi's colors!

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

The TT RS always has a slight advantage over the RS3 due to it being approximately 100 kg lighter, which is a difference of close to 7%, which means that the RS3 would need close to 7% more power than a TT RS to match its speed. The fact that this OPF TT RS only matches the speed of the pre OPF RS3 would suggest that the TT RS indeed has lost some of its former power in my opinion. It could possibly become a bit faster still though, once it has done some more miles. Great and interesting video, thanks!

[@Automann-TV]

Hi...have to disagree;) the weight advantage of the TTRS only pays off up until 100km/h and becomes almost obsolete once in motion. The aerodynamics make a difference, mainly due to wider tires of the TT RS compared to the RS3 we drove. We have experienced the same with S3 sedan & TTS...whereas the S3 always had better 100-200 times🤷‍♂️

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

@@Automann-TV I agree that the aerodynamics makes a difference at higher speeds, but as long as a vehicle is accelerating, both weight and power plays a big role. Acceleration = force divided by mass. This means that a 7% decrease in mass is just as useful as a 7% increase in power. EDIT: How much of the weight advantage that's negated by the extra air resistance and bigger wheels is very difficult to say though. Maybe it evens out at really high speeds?

[@Automann-TV]

Totally right but your equation only works if you have 0% drag. For this weight difference it’ll likely even out at about 100 km/h...that’s why aerodynamics have more to do with the time than sheer power...or wind direction.

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

@@Automann-TV All videos I have seen would suggest otherwise. The TT RS always seem to be at least a bit faster even at higher speeds. Then again, your 2018 RS3 is also the fastest RS3 I have ever seen, at least in the 100-200 interval. Other RS3s usually seem to do 9.5-10 s in that range while yours did 9.1. So perhaps it's a bit unfair to compare with that particular one. Maybe you guys got lucky and got one of the fastest stock RS3 ever made? 👍

[@nicihartl]

Yes, so many bad information in this video, unbelievable. 1. TTRS are always faster than the RS3 100-200 kmh, enough data to proof anywhere on the internet et cetera. Also a group called „Zeitenjagd 100-200“ on facebook2. The wheels of the TTRS - even though 20 inch- are lighter than the ones found on the RS3. And there is actually also a 19 inch option on the TTRS - actually as standard. 3. Video shows, that OPF cars are slower, as stock TTRS PFL run easily under 9 seconds 100-200kmh.

[@bannerle3768]

You are the first guy in the world saying the rs3 is faster than a tt rs.... no way! If a rs3 is faster, than it is 100% not stock!

[@Sierra-hk8jw]

True.

[@Automann-TV]

100-200 RS3 Sedan! is identical or faster....explanation why is in the video.

[@bannerle3768]

Automann-TV bullshit! Rs3 is more than 100kh heavier! Show me one video where an rs3 is faster and i will show you 10😉

[@MrFrEaKyDeLuXe]

Banner Le is right, sorry Automann-TV, I got a TTRS pre OPF on my own, which is 100% stock, and which CORRECTED times are faster than your measurement in the video.. the other TTRS I know also.. every RS3 (regardless if sedan or Sportback) is about 0,3-0,5s slower stock than a stock TTRS 8S. Maybe it could help to correct the times and not just showing what the Drift Box says (Slope etc). The OPF (GPF) does make the cars slower ( TTRS with OPF about 9,4-9,6s and RS3 about 9,8-10,3s corrected), but not that much from 100-200. Above 200 it's different to the non OPF model cars. You'll see it when you dyno the cars, non OPF cars has a better line on top while the OPF car's line go down earlier.

[@TheSpeedyGhost]

@@Automann-TV It is also the first time I have heard that a stock RS3 sedan/limousine (294 kW) should be faster than a stock TT RS (294 kW) - and I disagree... (as long as we are comparing pre-OPF with pre-OPF, or post-OPF with post-OPF). You are right that the optional, wider 20 inch wheels/tires (which I BTW guess most TT RS's have) is a disadvantage compared to the narrower and lighter wheels/tires on most RS3's. BUT on 2 other important factors the TT RS has the advantage, if you go by the official Audi technical data (...i.e. not taking into account various optional equipment): Weight and aerodynamics. The TT RS is approx. 75 kg lighter than the RS3 sedan (limousine), which helps at all speeds - and its drag area is smaller (Cd x A = 0,67 vs 0,71 m^2), which helps increasingly at higher speeds. The TTRS numbers are with the standard 19 inch wheels, though I am not sure which rear wing/spoiler; I am guessing the fixed one, since this is the standard (the retractable/active one is a no-cost option). IMO it makes no sense whatsoever, when you say that the longer wheel base and/or "shape" of the RS3 sedan (limousine) should give it an advantage over the TT RS - care to elaborate on that?! The RS3 sedan's longer wheel base (or "shape", if generating more down force) might make it more stable than the TT RS at high speeds, but is doesn't make it faster. Your own numbers even prove that your TTRS (with OPF) is faster to 250 kmh (25,9 s vs 26,3 s), despite being slower to 200 kmh (13,1 s vs 12,8 s ... for whatever reason that might be). So, alone from these numbers (and combined with mentioned official technical data) I don't get it, why you are concluding that the "shape" (i.e. drag) of the RS3 sedan should be better. I think a couple of other factors might be influencing your measured acceleration times and leading to your erroneous conclusion, e.g. weather conditions (air pressure, temperature, humidity, wind etc.), slope, fuel tank content (full vs nearly empty), most likely also spread in ACTUAL power&torque in the tested vehicles. Maybe you have just been lucky and have a "golden sample", but there are also magazine tests where the RS3 sedan is way slower than yours, see e.g. www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/fahrbericht/audi-rs3-limousine-test-hockenheim-leistungsdaten/technische-daten/ (IDK the exact test conditions, but the measured RS3 sedan did 0-200 kmh = 14,5 sec ...but okay, acc. to the AMS technical data, that car was running 19 inch tires on 18 inch wheels, so... LOL :-D ) Anyway, simply put: If all things (EXCEPT weight and drag area, which by stock/design are different) were equal, the TT RS is the faster car, 0-100 kmh and 100-200 kmh - and anything in between or above.

[@utini11]

Weird.. I always thought the TTRS was faster than the RS3 in every metric because of the couple hundred pound weight difference.

[@_Ambition124]

It is quicker and faster

[@UversusNoob]

Actually he is... the TT RS 2017 did a 0-100 in 3.4 sek. and a 0-200 in 11.8 sek. (also tested from automann tv) The reason is, that the non opf tt rs is about 1515 kg and the opf tt rs well above 1700 kg.

[@spottdrossel100]

@@_Ambition124 As you see its not. My 540hp RS3 Limo fucks it even more easily 😎😎

[@smc2069]

@@spottdrossel100 oh so now you're admitting you're rs3 is tuned too? Lol dude youre not the brightest chappie are you we're comparing stock for stock you utter dipshit 😂😂😂

[@lucasmontefeltro3223]

@@UversusNoob Omg the 2020 TT RS is 1440 kg...

[@TheRealFloW96]

Stunning car. 😍

[@ianmitchell9102]

Surely you need more of a full power pass at 100kph when testing 100-200 ?? You only put your foot down at 83kph

[@sven4492]

Bin so froh das 2017er Modell ohne OPF mit der RS Abgabsanlage zu haben :D. Der knallt sowas von ^^

[@hasangenc2922]

💪

[@wurf5336]

Did you ever try 100-200 run? Is it really 8.4s on 2017 ?

[@MachoMadness69420]

Carwow also tested this theory. They compared two RS3 hatchbacks, a 2017 MY and a 2020 MY.

[@model_building_fan7708]

One with pano other without

[@wurf5336]

carwow comparisons are trash tbh... they never compare 1:1

[@elcapitano7294]

❤️ the Color

[@Arrow_1809]

Thanks For all your wondeful video 👍

[@Romsneglen69]

Thanks Gretha ☹️

[@Henry-vu8rf]

Anders Mørk was hat Greta mit der Lautstärkenregulierung zu tun?

[@Romsneglen69]

M Eines Tages wirst du es herausfinden

[@Henry-vu8rf]

Anders Mørk der OPF oder was?

[@Romsneglen69]

M H it’s all about emission

[@Introgamer14]

Lärmbelastung fällt in Deutschland unter den Umweltschutz auf den Straßen bzw. im Verkehr. Von daher nicht ganz fern.

[@huntgodz2659]

I love this green color

[@Legoless.]

It seems odd that your TT RS consistently shifts at 6.8k in first gear, when my RS3 OPF would even shift at 5.5k, hurting the 0-100 time by a lot. In 3rd gear it even goes above the red line..

[@Hrtt]

Very fast with 400hp

[@TheEryk03]

Becouse it is Turbo engine and its light.

[@nathanscott9075]

Grea vid 🏁👍🏻

[@Emerill123]

Hmm, you should try the new Racebox for time measurement :)

[@hongjiankou35]

Good video Mate. however you have to think cars run after many years OPF may get blocked

[@skylerssupercarlife348]

I've clocked a 3.4 0 to 60 in my 17' using my Dragy.

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

Which is 0-100 in 3.6. Very close to what they did in this video.

[@dimmacommunication]

@@Zeruel82Mk2 isn't dragy good ?

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

@@dimmacommunication Yes it is.👍

[@steineins]

The sound is really bad now

[@Automann-TV]

I guess that depends on what “really” and what “bad” means;)

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

I think it's still better than most cars out there, just not as good as before.

[@steineins]

Automann-TV i mean without opf its much louder

[@Carlifurafollas]

It does not have sport exhaust

[@nik7bkh965]

Aftermarket parts without OPF are necessary if you are a car enthusiast.

[@termi807]

love TTRS

[@legendniggo3325]

Besser wäre der Vergleich zwischen einem non OPF TT RS und einem OPF TT RS da der cw-Wert usw. gleich ist. Zwischen TT RS und RS3 ist der cw-Wert unterschiedlich, was angesichts der gleichen Motorleistung die Zeiten etwas verfälschen könnte, wenn man den Unterschied zwischen OPF und non OPF herausfinden will. Würde mich mal interessieren inwiefern das einen Unterschied macht :)

[@Automann-TV]

Den bisher besten direkten Vergleich zwischen den beiden hat Carwow...allerdings mit RS3 5-Türern. Da sieht man, dass der mit OPF sogar leicht schneller ist sobald in Bewegung. Den Vorteil des Non-OPF auf 100 kann man wohl durch den langsamer aufbauenden Turbo-Druck bei Launch Control erklären, das wusste ich vorher auch nicht aber es wurde hier in den Kommentaren von 2 Zuschauern bei ihren RS Facelift bestätigt👍

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

@@Automann-TV There is something very strange going on in that video in my opinion. Carwow have previously tested two RS3. One grey 2017 hatchback and one green 2018 sedan. Both did 12.2 s in the quarter mile. A bit slow compared to most customer cars in good conditions, which usually do 11.7-11.8, but both RS3 they used were low mileage press cars, and they most likely don't use a foot of rollout for their timing, so fair enough. Then, they tested (on several different occasions) a white 2019 RS3 hatchback which every time did 12.7, half a second slower then the 2017/2018 cars. They also measured 0-60 which was half a second slower than the 2017 grey one, and Mat noted that the launch was nowhere near as fast as in the previous cars. This causes everyone in the comments section to request a race/comparison between the two, and carwow actually listens (nice!). What happens in that very video is what's really strange: All of a sudden the 2017 RS3 is 0.3 s slower in the quarter mile while the 2019 one is 0.2 s faster, and they both do 12.5. I strongly believe that the only way to make this happen is a sneaky downgrade for the 2017 model and an upgrade for the 2019 one to make them equally fast. Who did this and why? Audi of course. They know millions of people watch those videos, and they obviously want people to buy the 2019 RS3. If it had clearly showed that the 2019 model is a lot slower, it would have hurt the sales of the RS3. Also note that the 2017 RS3 only has about 450 nm of torque according to the dyno in that video. We all know that 2017-2018 RS3 models have way more than that. That is what I think happened. But I'm open to other suggestions/opinions. 👍

[@legendniggo3325]

@@Automann-TV ja der Aufbau vom Ladedruck dauert länger das ist mir im Video bei der Launch Control auch aufgefallen. Allerdings ist der non OPF RS3 im oberen Drehzahlbereich leistungsstärker, da zwischen Turbo und OPF ein Abgasgegendruck entsteht und der Turbo somit die Abgase nicht so gut loswerden kann. Kann man auch im Carwow Vergleich beobachten. Wäre nur mal interessant gewesen ob zwischen 2017er TT RS und 2019er TT RS ein ähnlicher Unterschied liegt oder sich etwas vom RS3 unterscheidet. Trotzdem gutes Video! Vom 5-Zylinder kann man einfach nicht genug kriegen.

[@legendniggo3325]

@@Zeruel82Mk2 its a very direct and good explained opinion but i disagree at two points. The first point is the time of both cars. As we know most cars have a bit more power than the technical data says but still some have a bit less. It could be possible that in the first test of 2019 cars they got a car which had less power than mentioned in the technical datas. As @Automann-Tv said the 2019 RS3 needs a bit more time to generate the full boost in the launch control. Same thing with the 2017 RS3. As the dyno confirms the 2017 RS3 has only 450Nm of torque (480nm stated in technical data).The reason for the missing power are in my opinion the press cars which were used in the tests. If im wrong correct me but i think the problem with the press cars is that the magazines want to feel the power instantly which means that the car dealer hands the cars to the press and they give full throttle after just 10km or something. What i want to say is usually you need to wait about 600 miles (1000km) to give full throttle because the motor parts need some time to fit each other. This range is not given in the press cars which has an effect on the engine power. Cars which have been driven this range usually have a bit more power and cars without the range have the power of the technical data or sometimes a bit less power. In the Test between 2017 and 2019 cars it might be that they got a well driven 2019 car and a badly driven 2017 car which would explain the same time in the drag race. I wouldn`t blame Audi for the results. If you would test 20 different cars in a big drag race i think there wolud be 5 different times. If im wrong in some points please correct me.

[@legendniggo3325]

@@Zeruel82Mk2 i`ve watched the video once again. So the reason for the better start for the Opf is the optimization of the transmission software. The kick down is a little bit fast than in the non Opf RS3. At speeds under 140mph (230km/h) the opf version is faster because of the faster kick down. But in higher speed sections the exhaust gas volume has a rising effect on the acceleration. Thats the reason why the 2017 Rs3 accelerates better at speeds above 140mph than the 2019 rs3. The Opf prevents the engine to breathe as a result of losing a bit of power.

[@hershin]

When your gran knits you a pair of racing gloves...

[@Andyuk911]

A tank of fuel will make a difference .... your cars appears to be pretty full ...

[@sammgaming676]

Those gloves are amazing 😂

[@joyousjoyous2136]

You had the previous one,without the OPF TTRS 17'..3.4 sec to 100km/h 8.4,5 sec 100-200kmh,saying the RS3 is quicker 100-200 km/h is not the case comparing it to the same PRE OPF Version TTRS And the shape is more aerodynamic on the TTRS lol, dude that debate is weird for you. Ofcourse the car is slower with the OPF .. And this is your channel showing it and more kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqWxpYOrfNJ_gZo

[@ftyiogtyre7769]

It isn't slower you dense mook, check out the carwow video.

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

@@ftyiogtyre7769 The results in that video are highly fabricated. They detuned the 2017 model to make it slower.

[@Automann-TV]

Nope, the TT RS you are referring to we had 3 years ago was not measured with the GPS-Box & on a different piece of Autobahn. A/S/RS3 sedan is more aerodynamic mainly because of more narrow 19 inch vs. 20 inch & shorter shape of TT/TTS/TTRS...especially with that big rear wing.

[@joyousjoyous2136]

@@Automann-TV Just put them side to side both having the OPF or without already , let everybody see it , rolling :) Having bigger wheels instead of 75 kilos huh?! But ye , we are still talking OPF and PRE OPF which is not the same at all and by the way where is the video you measured the TTRS 16 or 17 let us check it please

[@iMacSaw]

Automann-TV das stimmt so aber nicht. Der TT RS hat sowohl einen geringeren CW-Wert, als auch eine kleinere Stirnfläche, als der RS3 Sedan. Folglich ist die Fahrwiderstandskraft beim TT RS auch geringer. Zudem kommt es noch stark auf die Luftdichte, die Höhenmeter und den Luftdruck an. Im Norden fahren die selben Fahrzeuge daher immer ein paar Zehntel schneller, als im Süden. :-) Nur mal so am Rande, wenn Zeiten verglichen werden...

[@joepotter4338]

Is this new car fitted with the factory sports exhaust?

[@Automann-TV]

Yes👍

[@phillipewillems3081]

I can also speak from personal experience 😁

[@TGV1337]

Drive and Sound video please!

[@smc2069]

There's some confusion here as the 2018 ttrs is faster than the 2018 rs3, both to 100kmph and from 100-200. Its lighter and it's more aerodynamic. There's a video on this channel of the pre opf ttrs doing 3.4 to 100kmph and 11.8 to 200kmph. So this confuses me kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqWxpYOrfNJ_gZo

[@spottdrossel100]

Another idiot... No, it's simply NOT more aerodynamic... My RS3 Limo raced against TTRS on Autobahn, both stock. It was a draw.

[@smc2069]

@@spottdrossel100 I think its you whose the idiot ttrs is clearly faster kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z2O5cmBudp2VbNE

[@smc2069]

@@spottdrossel100 kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3XPY2CmbJqJh68 Another video clear as day. Ttrs is noticeably lighter and will be more aerodynamic as its lower to the ground. And since they've got the same engine with the same power its oh so obvious what will win in a drag race 🙂🙂🙂🙂

[@_Ambition124]

@@spottdrossel100 impossible...

[@LBB988]

rsq3 2020, when?

[@Automann-TV]

Tuesday🙌😛

[@LBB988]

@@Automann-TV same this vid, with vbox numbers..let's compare.

[@Automann-TV]

Unfortunately the video will be from Sweden...so no 0-200 this time🤷‍♂️

[@toufiklebciralgeria1541]

Nice Nice video 👍👍💚💚

[@dragonsickness4561]

Best car available. Way better than a Tesla. These things are so insane.

[@dragonsickness4561]

@@orbetobe that marketing works and most ppl don't care about driving dynamics. Otherwise SUVs wouldn't be so popular. Also, these are limited production, high price tag and Audi has a lot of other RS models that are bigger.

[@dragonsickness4561]

@@orbetobe EV are less stable due to lack of the gyroscopic stabilization effect. Especially at high speeds. You're welcome.

[@dragonsickness4561]

@@orbetobe that's rigidity - not stability. Good luck weaving thru traffic in the rain in that boat. hope ur roof doesn't fly off

[@dragonsickness4561]

@@orbetobe also the interior/exterior design is garbage and the build quality is trash but that's just facts

[@dragonsickness4561]

@@orbetobe yes. I'm a shareholder. Plz buy one

[@daynight1921]

Omg 😍👍

[@dimmacommunication]

So the rs3 sedan is the best for high speed ?

[@Inazuma68]

Ohne Zweifel unglaublich schnelles Fahrzeug. Trotzdem habe ich Mühe damit. Vielleicht werde ich alt. Einfach nur die Elektronik arbeiten lassen ist etwas langweilig. Ich finds immer noch ehrlicher die Kupplung selber kommen zulassen und die Gänge zu wechseln. Ausserdem macht es def. mehr Spass und eigentlich gehts doch darum und nicht, ob ich jetzt ein paar Zehntel schneller bin. In der Praxis spielt das eh keine Rolle

[@crunchpunch8613]

Ja inzwischen ist es echt langweilig alles den Computer machen zu lassen. Selbst das Schubknallen und die 0-100 Zeiten sind immer die selben. Einfach charakterlos solche modernen Kisten

[@glenclough9080]

What the hell was that at 4:37 ??

[@lars8912]

Volvo

[@wh1teey]

9,6 Liter... krass

[@Christian-kg2uk]

Wenig, in Ordnung oder viel 😂?

[@Introgamer14]

@@Christian-kg2uk is gut fürn 5 zylinder

[@wh1teey]

@@Christian-kg2uk Für so n auto richtig gut finde ich :D

[@figgelfuggel]

Ich bekomm das mit meinem aber auch nicht hin. 12, eher 13 sind ein realistischer wert auf der Landstraße

[@joyousjoyous2136]

3.45 sec to 100kmh , 100-200kmh 8.5sec draggy felthamttrs8s 0.32%slope on my 17ttrs (similiar times for most ttrs draggy users pre opf or 9sec at most 100-200kmh) , Automann you dont have the 17 measured anywhere i tried to find it in either urs or Autotopnls channel, claiming crap again mate like saying the opf version aint slower or the 75kg heavier car faster rolling cause longer ( means more downforce , could mean more stability but does not mean its faster). It was proven in the audi forums multiple times

[@spottdrossel100]

8,5...downhill maybe... LOL, you TTRS drivers are dreamers and idiots 😂

[@ggergg6423]

@@orbetobe Yeah, but your battery pack will fail or degrade after warranty so safe some cash for the replacement.....

[@ggergg6423]

@@orbetobe I have had many electric vehicles, they have massive/expensive issues too...and they lose value quickly, are limited in their use case, and are not easy to sell. Point is they both suck, and ultimately it might be cheaper to just drive an ICE till it dies or you can't get gas.....lol

[@ggergg6423]

No worries, best of luck with the Tesla

[@Buck3366]

Automann.Some VERY conflicting stats and times in this comment section regarding the previous red non OPF TTRS you tested before. You state the RS3 is faster than the TTRS in part to the 20 inch alloys on the TT YET you ran a 19 inch alloy wheel on the red pre facelift car not the optional 20 inch as seen on this green car. Also you state the times were incorrect on the older TTRS as you didn’t use GPS timing gear, well a visual time check of that car showed a sub 10 second 100-200 kph! Please, if you site incorrect info for a video maybe do another to correct it with GPS to variety your claims. People still watch your older videos.

[@khalifabentley6594]

❤❤

[@janibba5839]

#Audi4ever

[@adrianproniewicz1987]

On the dyno 430 hp?:)

[@Automann-TV]

Maybe! Our 450+ hp M4 Competition wasn‘t that much quicker:)

[@TheEryk03]

With OPF definitely not.

[@guilhermemuquem2466]

It would look even better with brown interior !

[@haraldzingerle]

Those old-people hand gloves 🤣🤣

[@stephen300o6]

As apposed to foot gloves...

[@barongreenbackthe2nd418]

My grandad has the same gloves.

[@Archerke]

Did you just say in the beginning of the video that an rs3 is quicker than a ttrs of the same modelyear? Man I thought u knew your cars, seems u dont. Ttrs is always faster than an rs3

[@lt.martincastillo5122]

Let me correct you: RS3 Limousine is always faster TTRS. He is right.

[@Archerke]

@@lt.martincastillo5122 lol you dont know anything about cars clearly. Ttrs is always faster than any rs3

[@scottchua6787]

Do all countries have the OPF filter?

[@Zeruel82Mk2]

Only Europe so far I believe.

[@GreggCesaroni]

Europe. US and Canada doesn’t have it. Thankfully.

[@dimmacommunication]

Only us " lucky " europeans 🙄🙄🙄

[@zoricasremcevic8705]

The TT RS is lighter than rs3 !

[@leandro50163]

100-200 = 13,1-3,7=9,4

[@ron3621]

🤤🤤😍

[@Pseudo_Placebo]

Gibt's den Wagen auch mit Klang🤔

[@lucaa1278]

Wo hat der bitte keinen Klang???

[@Pseudo_Placebo]

@@lucaa1278 gute Frage, ich höre ihn auch nicht

[@hasangenc2922]

Ist kein amg

[@lucaa1278]

@@hasangenc2922 leise.der hat guten klang ok

[@hasangenc2922]

@@lucaa1278 beruhig deine hormone für ein audi klingt der echt gut

[@profbtg]

Was ein Quatsch, die TTRS sind immer schneller als die RS3 100-200 kmh wegen des geringeren Gewichts. Mein VFL fuhr Serie übrigens unter 9 Sekunden. Temperatur ist auch sehr wichtig bei den Vergleichen! Also leider viele Fehlinformationen in diesem Video!

[@Automann-TV]

Das Gewicht spielt oberhalb von 100 km/h nur noch eine nachgelagerte Rolle weshalb es die 100-200 Zeit kaum positiv (aus Sicht des TTRS) beeinflusst. Klar, Temperatur ist wichtig...da wir unseren VFL RS3 und unseren TTRS unter sehr ähnlichen Temperaturbedingungen getestet haben habe ich die Komponente mal rausgenommen. Denke auch, dass hier beim FL noch was geht....wir werden den Test in 10.000 km mit Sommerreifen nochmal wiederholen💪

[@Viewer4485]

@@Automann-TV Sorry aber das höre ich zum ersten mal, dass ein TT rs langsamer als ein RS3 sein soll. Eigentlich ist nen TT rs immer so 0,2 sek schneller. Den TT RS kann man auch mit 19 Zoll Felgen kaufen.

[@Automann-TV]

Kann man, aber 90% der TTRS laufen auf 20 Zoll 255er rundum, die RS3 haben 19 Zoll und zumindestens hinten 235er...das ist schon ein Nachteil für den TTRS. Des Weiteren zieht der Flügel zusätzlich topspeed, die Limo Karosserie ist dagegen aerodynamischer. Haben wir bei 2-3 Vergleichen jedes Mal so erlebt. So oder so, der Facelift TTRS geht nicht signifikant schlechter als ein Vor-Facelift.

[@profbtg]

Also Sie machen sich lächerlich: Der cW x A Wert ist sogar niedriger beim TTRS nach Recherche mit 0,67 (0,32 x 2,1) als beim RS3 mit 0,71 (0,34 x 2,16). Also Bitte, wieviele Fakten soll man noch bringen? Es gibt auch genügend Videos, die Ihre These widerlegen, von AMS über Archie Hamilton et cetera. Dazu noch die Gruppen/Foren. Sie machen sich echt lächerlich...

[@TheSpeedyGhost]

@@Automann-TV Wenn die Limo aerodynamischer sein sollte, wie erklärst du dann, dass der TT RS von 200-250 kmh schneller ist (TT RS=12,8s vs RS3=13,5s) , lt deinen EIGENEN Messungen ?? Schmeiss den RS3 doch endlich mal aufn Leistungsprüfstand und du wirst sehr wahrscheinlich feststellen, dass er einfach um einiges mehr an Leistung hat, als die nominell angebenen 400 PS. Das wäre auch eine viel plausiblere Erklärung für die gemessene Zeiten, als deine nicht-nachvollziehbaren Behauptungen bez. der besseren Aerodynamik und längerem Radstand des RS3's...

[@shiftkaan]

Ich denke mal das die Hersteller in einigen Jahren den Sound in Griff kriegen werden, das wird ja langsam was

[@dominoc5]

jep, in paar jahren gibts gar kein Sound mehr draussen :) Daran können auch die Hersteller nix ändern.

[@Winterstein12]

Your other vidéo tt rs 3sec4 To 100 and 11sec8 To 200

[@mariussrs]

Who doesn’t rather get a Non-OPF TTRS/RS3 instead of an OPF one?

[@dimmacommunication]

But " fantastic " euro laws forces us to do so... only in EU 🥴🥴

[@barrycomer4459]

Where the hell is dsg fart??????

[@rider_ringz5381]

I mean muffler delete resonator delete and downpipes no more OPF and also more power plus a better sound i swear u r in germany where the laws are so relaxed being ( police wont bother you ).

[@giovannisalikos4076]

Nissan gtr 2017 !!!!

[@stefanbecker70]

Handschuhe 😄😄😄😄😄

[@allure11]

S3/RS3 langsamer als tts und ttrs? Da bist du falsch informiert... die sind definitiv schneller beim beschleunigen😊

[@Automann-TV]

Genau das habe ich im Video erläutert😅👍

[@allure11]

@@Automann-TV Ich meine damit, dass TTS und TTRS definitiv schneller sind (im Video sagst du ja "S3 and RS3 sedans were alway faster than TTS and TTRS"). Da bist Du falsch informiert. In der 100-200 KMH Gruppe auf Facebook sieht man auch schwarz auf weiss, dass die TTS und TTRS immer schneller sind als die S3 und RS3 :-)

[@martingrone9191]

Mein TTRS 2018 macht 0-100 3,5 0-200 12,5

[@ricardoquaresma1803]

@@orbetobe Boah, es juckt keinen, dafür macht der ttrs viel mehr Spaß

[@ricardoquaresma1803]

@@orbetobe "Langsam" 3,4 Sekunden von 0-100 sind alles aber nicht langsam und genau das laute ist ja das gute, ich würde den sogar lieber fahren selbst wenn er 10 Sekunden von 0-100 braucht

[@ricardoquaresma1803]

@@orbetobe Der Ttrs ist aber trotzdem schnell, nur weil du schneller bist, heißt es nicht dass der ttrs langsam ist, außerdem ist mir Geschwindigkeit kack egal, ich will nicht in einem billig Innenraum sitzen der aus einem Lenkrad und einem Tablet besteht und ich will auch mal 300 fahren, das geht mit deinem Tesla eben nicht, 0-100 sind absolut unnötig

[@ricardoquaresma1803]

@@orbetobe Du denkst halt wirklich dein Tesla wäre das heftigste und krasseste Auto dass es gibt, dabei würde ich so einer Plastikbude sogar nen Alten Golf vorziehen, ich habe kein Bock in nem Auto zusitzen welches keinerlei Emotionen hat, und gegen nen 911 Turbo S siehst du sowieso kein Land du Vogel, ich verstehe auch gar nicht was du hier in den Kommentaren verloren hast

[@ricardoquaresma1803]

@@orbetobe kzbin.info/www/bejne/hGewnHuraLxpjbM deutlich langsamer als der tt

[@9tbiker455]

Hab euch früher echt gerne geschaut, aber seit ihr die Schummler Firma Audi unterstützt nicht mehr. Wie kann man eine Marke unterstützen, die betrügt und die komplette Branche ruiniert??

[@hasangenc2922]

Tesla ruiniert die Branche, sonst keiner

[@ThePhilkid]

Plebs on the auto..

[@MetalForever895]

Germans always articulating with their hands... I would rather buy an AMG CLA 45S if I had the money.