Sony a6600 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Review: King of compact cameras?

Tony Northrup reviews the $1,400 Sony a6600 (sdp.io/a6600) mirrorless camera vs the Fujifilm X-T3 (sdp.io/XT3), the Sony a6400 (sdp.io/a6400) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (sdp.io/XH1). Get 20% off everything at northrup.photo with the coupon code 'ihaterain'

[@teridzard1776]

I always wonder how many percent of camera buyers are actually "vloggers". Maybe it is a number like 0.5%?

[@marcd7332]

Jason Levine Hm I’m sure most people stopped buying cameras for vacation since the iPhone came out

[@dash3dot]

it's actually closer to 0.01%

[@Ell.06]

Was thinking exactly this!

[@Fabio-rg9nv]

The thing is that most camera reviews are on KZbin and those are pretty much the only people that really vlog a lot. So it seems like a whole lot of people complain about it, but in reality there are so many other photographers and videographers that enjoy Fujifilm‘s screen design and I really hope they don‘t change it just because of vloggers complaining.

[@trolledyou7032]

That flippy screen is very handy not only for vlogging you idiots. And ibis is just awesome for pictures too, not only for video.

[@joe_a_photo]

I love how people want a flip out screen to take selfies with a $1,400 camera. Selfies seem like the LOWEST priority when buying an expensive camera.

[@starwf07]

For real. I actually even get a bit annoyed that people spend time discussing vlogging potential in a review of a premium camera. Vlogging is at about the very bottom of the photography/videography totem pole in a close race with bathroom-mirror-selfies and sending pictures of your mole to your doctor.

[@Fabio-rg9nv]

I‘ve always preferred Fujifilm‘s screen. Vlogging is literally the only capability the screen lacks while doing great in every other situation, in landscape AND portrait orientation. I think the reason so „many“ people complain about no flip screen is because we‘re on KZbin and those people making reviews are pretty much the only people that vlog. But the truth is that the majority of photographers and videographers don‘t film themselves at all. I really hope Fujifilm keeps their screen design, no matter how many KZbinrs complain about it, because there are so many other people that (I bet) really enjoy their display the way it is.

[@legend240891]

untrue. this screen is for monitoring purpose when you dont want to bring a dedicated monitor along. it can be very convenient.

[@praftman]

Joseph A you're confusing selfies with monitoring during vlogging, and there's really no excuse since it's laid out redundantly in this review here which you presumably just watched, and, well, everywhere else online as well

[@lboymusic]

oh man, YOU'RE SO CLEVER. That's exactly what Tony Northrup is doing in this video... taking selfies, right? What about protecting the LCD from scratches?!?! Is that also taking selfies in your "smart" opinion?!?!?? My god!!!!!

[@Khaos768]

A flip screen is not only for selfies. I use it all the time when I do product photography. I get in front of the camera and position the product while looking the live view on my screen.

[@TonyAndChelsea]

Yeah, agreed.

[@jeezygarceezy]

just use remote operation on your phone or ipad

[@zerospecs2331]

@@jeezygarceezy Can you explain what this is? There's a way to send a feed of what the camera sees to a different device's screen? How does that work? 🤔

[@kristiangurholt59]

I don’t vlog, but one of the reasons I got an a6100 for the flip-up screen was to be able to frame myself when filming guitar videos. So yeah, it’s useful for a lot more than taking selfies.

[@schmoab]

The Fuji reminds me of the “Fujica” aperture priority 35mm SLR I learned on. Very interested in these now.

[@czzare.2402]

I just got the Fujifilm X-T3 with 18-55 lens for vlog, it works pretty well. And for HDR images, I am still using the Nikon D850+three primary lenses+85mm 1.4. For stability of XT3, I choose Zhiyun Crane 3 to neutralize the lost.

[@Coppershort]

Quick question, how does the X-H1 compare to newer cameras in 2019? Due to the price drop, is it a worth purchase for the IBIS for stills in exchange for the worse auto focus over the X-T3?

[@nisarali4258]

it seems like fuji was watching your review and came out with XT4, everything you mentioned is fixed in the new XT4

[@willbrink]

This was perhaps the most useful review, especially for those on the fence between the Sony and the Fuji. I ended up going with the Sony 6600. I can see the attraction of the Fuji, especially at it reminds of cameras of old, like my Nikon FE2 for which I have such fond memories and learned on, but I time waits for no one and I felt Sony the modern APC that should be more camera than I'd ever need and is smaller than the Fuji, a major reason for having an APC.

[@a6893_]

It depends on your hand size. Too small is not comfortable at all.

[@marumaruko6512]

@@a6893_ its big enough comparing to gr3, and its much comfortable griping to fuji

[@chtojeetovsezanyali]

Fuji's app now works well on all devices I have. I have the x-h1, very well made camera for photo with video capabilities.

[@AlanHoey86]

I've been wavering between picking up a XT-3 or an A7iii for a while. I love the Fuji lenses, ergonomics and overall joy of using the camera. The A7iii is a powerhouse but an expensive eco-system to buy into past the body. Still going back and forth but Sony a6600 doesn't change that for me. If I wanted crop I'd go for the X-T3, If I wanted full frame I'd go for the A7iii.

[@hVF8KZuQPeCc8u]

Great to see, at a much more recent vantage point, the Fuji XT4 rectified most of the criticisms you leveled at the XT3. I debated buying the a6600 vs the XT4 and think the XT4 is all around better.

[@kingweddingmedia]

I’m an a7iii owner with a6400’s as my back ups. For me, the a6400 is a better value purchase over the 6600 as you’re pretty much only getting sensor stabilisation (which isn’t really all that great - the extra battery life doesn’t bother me) as an extra. If they had gave it 2 card slots then I’d say the difference would have definitely been worth it.

[@Hazard4Tactical]

Great video. We just got the xt3 and 6 lenses but love our Sony’s. For video the Sony has so much rolling shutters hand held that it’s better off to get the jittery XT3 which is more natural and easier to fight in post.

[@klarion]

Post production is the main reason I got rid of most of my sony equipment. I find that when I use the Fuji, there is little (comparatively) that needs to be done, while Sony files don't look right to my eye and almost always require work.

[@benschrader5797]

It’s hard to compare cameras without talking about the lenses available. It’d be interesting to see how the E 16-55mm f2.8 compares to Fuji’s XF equivalent. Even so, the XF 16mm f1.4 alone keeps me in the Fuji camp; that lens is pure magic.

[@mahmud-ahsan]

Great review. I used to be a Fuji user with Fuji XT-2 camera and some lens, but when I started my youtube channel and need to create more videos I found a fully-articulated screen is what I needed most. And then I switched to Lumix G9 camera. But I still think fuji's color science is better than Lumix.

[@Vikingdescendent]

The Fuji X T3 is ART in every way. There are lots of native high quality OIS lenses for it, that won't tire you out before the end of a shoot, so no in body stabilization is not an issue. The battery inadequacy is an issue, if you shoot a lot of 4K, but not so much for the still shooter. The EVF alone is one of the best out there and Fuji support is second to none.

[@TVe200]

Fuji's best lens the 16-55 have no OIS. So you end up with absolutely no stabilisation at all.

[@marcp.1752]

Fujifilm is for creating Art, Sony is...well, just a boxy camera, huge friggin expensive Lenses, and by no means the same quality bodies, handling, like a X-T3.

[@stephengatley8144]

@@TVe200 You know the X-H1 has IBIS right?, It's a phenomenal camera for the money!

[@12scarz9]

@@TVe200 who said that is a best Fuji lens?🤔

[@TVe200]

@@12scarz9 it is the best normal zoom. Most people take 80% of their pictures with a zoom in that range (equal 24-70 on full frame).

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

I don't think the 4:00 shot is blurry due to the lack of stabilization, I think it's blurry because Chelsea was moving.

[@marcd7332]

And it’s actually good for 1/30th

[@stuartschaffner9744]

I grew up using cameras with no stabilization. When stabilized lenses came along, it was liberating. Yes, back in the old days, 1/30th of a second was too slow. To get sharp images, you needed to carry tripods or flashes or simply avoid taking images inside. Think of the reciprocal rule as a limitation on unstabilized camera systems, not some general rule for all photography. Having an entire new area of the exposure triangle opened up gives you many new creative opportunities. Personally, I prefer having one IBIS system in the camera body and then be able to use unstabilized lenses. Also, I strongly suspect that the combination of lens and body stabilization is even better.

[@subject8123]

Was this really a versus video? Seems more like the first 10 minutes are 100% paid for by Sony and the remainder has a few brief comparisons between the two. With some look at all my camera clips thrown in.

[@Rek-55]

+ 70% of time about sony.

[@stuartschaffner9744]

Yes, this is a versus video about a just-released camera compared to a very well-known and reviewed alternative. It would make no sense to spend the same amount of time on the details of both. It’s an interesting concept that a mixture of positive and negative comments about the 6600 must be “100% paid for by Sony”, whereas a long list of specific differences (many favorable to the XT3) is “a few brief comparisons”.

[@pauloteixeira9443]

Subject 81 mm. N n vai k no m XXI no ok bom m bomt no mm vi na vi lá vi me o var trxjbn vi ok m o m é mm X vi no mm no me

[@pauloteixeira9443]

Rek-5 mm

[@bhagranaz]

Sony biased video

[@modrisklingenbergs]

x-t3 is a beauty. I just love to be with her...

[@tapasyatyaga4041]

Xt4 now

[@Yupthereitism]

Weirdo

[@rudolfabelin383]

The (nearly) perfect vloggin' camera is Olympus OMD EM5 mark III. From a good source.

[@TheEulerID]

Look at the Canon EOS RP for vlogging because it has full frame? Not when you use 4K with a 1.6 x crop. What's more you lose access to dual-pixel AF. Of course, you can stick to 1080 and use the full frame, but it still suffers on video quality compared to some of the competition, as it doesn't do full video frame readout. Of course it doesn't have IBIS either.

[@hirostvjapan]

When I bought a6400 I did look into X-T3 and Canon but I went with a6400 because it had no limit 4K recording, even at 4K all the AF works, flip-up screen, great AF, etc. It had a lot of things that I wanted and it was not that expensive. Since I came from G8 so I really miss IBIS in G8 but I love my a6400.

[@tylerdoestech]

Personally, I think the a6600 is a difficult sell when used a7III's on the secondary market (not necessarily secondhand retail) are regularly seen for $1,500-1,600. With the exception of the screen record time limit, and maybe real time tracking, I cannot think of anything the a6600 brings to the table that its bigger brother fails to provide, its advantages notwithstanding.

[@tonynguyen7636]

Tyler Barton portability

[@Hughguru]

I admire you and Chelsea and how much you guys are offering generously for free, thank you and keep it up. Hugh

[@MyKeyReviews]

I really don't get his issue with the control wheels, they're really easy to use...

[@MidsierramusingBlogspot]

Tony, your shirt "Highway 395" from Mt. Whitney to Yosemite is one of the prime areas for photography and one of my favorites.

[@arttiz01]

Thanks Tony! Great video! I have owned a6000 & 6500 before, but traded them for the A7iii and also enjoy much, much more my Fuji XT3!

[@paulbentley2709]

That's interesting... Can you explain. I assume because XT3 looks and feels like a proper camera not a box of tricks

[@Yupthereitism]

Cool

[@Sam1986E]

Fuji for life! The X-T3 is a beast!!! Specially with the new 80mm f2.8 Macro prime! Sharpness for days!

[@Sam1986E]

@@p3rrypm Thats one thing it doesn't have :( Unfortunately

[@quite1enough]

Thanks to the huge discount I was able to buy x-t3 finally (sold a6400). Felt like I had x-t3 all my life, ergonomics is awesome and just incompatible with Sony aps-c. Image rendition are simply brilliant and 10 bit video makes huge difference, very easy to render and very forgiving (especially when you don't have a chance to create a good lighting). Not to hate Sony, but their aps-c line felt more like an elaborate expensive toy, rather than proper camera. Fuji on the other hand feels like completely competent pro-body, with functions that makes so much sense that I can't understand how I lived without it before, lol

[@daaddyo1249]

I'm about to do the same haha, how is the lowlight on the xt3 compared to the a6400?

[@shahrinshahriar4836]

I did the same sold my Sony a 6400 and bought Fujifilm xt3!

[@abercrombie2684]

@@shahrinshahriar4836 Hi dude. I have a question. I myself want to buy fujifilm x-t3, now I use sony a6000. i process raw on my ipad pro in lightroom adobe. please tell me i can do it with fujifilm x-t3? I heard there are some compatibility problems of this camera with this program.

[@shahrinshahriar4836]

@@abercrombie2684 actually I use Windows but I edited few videos in final cut pro, didn't face any issue,if you talk about photos, didn't face any issue too.

[@EmtiMT]

This is a really good review Tony, many thanks!

[@1ccfjeff]

In another video ~"are DSLRs" dead (or dying?) you mentioned that Fuji mirrorless weren't selling well & they were a prime candidate for discontinuing them... & a risk to buy into a system that might be going away. Did I understand that correctly? Do you think that is a factor to take into account?

[@HappyHubris]

Tony, when you compare lens options it would be great if you included the more mundane lenses like 35mm OSS/35mm WR, the 18-135mm options from each company, etc.

[@ropeyarn]

I got GAS half way through video, but I do appreciate knowing the nuances between cameras.

[@Yunhaisongtao]

Hi Tony, great video as always. I mainly shoot night long exposure cityscapes, so sharpness, noise issue and Colors are my concerns. I just sold my APS-C DSLR, ready to pick up a new full frame system. How’s the color reproduction on the Sony mirrorless bodies such as a73 or a7r2? I heard Sony has the same green tint like Nikon, is it true? Do you need to adjust colors all the time? Do they give you sharp images? How about noise issue?

[@850Tech]

Hello Tony I am currently using EOS M6 Mark II. What do you think a Worthy upgrade in 2022 in midrange price range? ( Already I got some Canon EF lenses btw)

[@davva360]

I upgraded from the A6000 but got the A6400. Has most of the features of the A6600 the main thing missing is IBIS. I am sure IBIS is a good feature but I do not have an issue with camera shake even with the Sigma 16mm F1.4. I did not think it was worth another $500. I thought about going full frame but the lens prices put me off. I would have needed to buy a body and a good 24-70 and did not want to spend that much. I may go full frame at some point but not ready to do that yet. May wait for the A7iv, and buy an A7iii once the price drops.

[@vageeshsharma.]

what camera and lens combo do you recommend for music videos in a tight budget ?

[@pf4773]

I just completed my own quick still-image assessment of the Sony A6400 (slightly older version of the A6600 so slightly less image quality in the processor) and the Fuji XT3 using Imaging Resource's Comparometer. In their lab settings all you need to do is scroll down to a test image, set the ISO (in this case 3200 because I want good low-light image quality) then compare the two camera images enlarged considerably side by side. Remember, given today's technology we are looking at only slight, but still noticeable differences between cameras within their respective class types (in this case ASPC). Although the difference is slight I would comfortably rate the Sony A6400 image as good as to slightly better (perhaps up to 10%) than the Fuji XT3. Given that the A6400 image is slightly better and the Sony A6600 has the best auto focus in the business along with IBIS that the Fuji does not have, I would overall bet that the core quality of Sony A6600 images will be consistently better than the Fuji XT3. There is no comparison between an objective, lab-based image quality assessment with parameters carefully controlled for and someone's subjective measurement, although subjective assessments can point out a great deal in terms of other factors. So, if one is looking for the camera that will consistently take the better picture, all other factors controlled for, I would hands down bet on the Sony a6600 over the Fuji XT3. Again, see for yourself by going to the Imaging Resource's website-then click on the top of the home page for 1. camera reviews, then 2. compare images: Comparometer.

[@Sai_on_youtube]

For the most part, flip up screen does the job. Except vlogging. And so, SONY has provided a very small converter kinda thing to shift the hotshoe mount to the side which gets the job done.

[@EdoardoLegnaro]

Very nice content as always! You mentioned Final Cut, have you switched from Premiere? As a frustrated Premiere user and being in the market for a new laptop, I'd be very interested in hearing your experience with Final Cut and your Macbook Pro. Thank you!

[@CoveringFish]

NOOOOOO go windows and go davinci resolve

[@cristianmk]

Fcpx is amazing. I've been using it since its crappy 10.0.0 version back in 2011, and since then it has evolved into a powerhouse, its fast, stable, fluid, intuitive and versatile. And also, forget about rendering. Its one of the best investments I've ever made. For professional use is among the best, together with DaVinci Resolve.

[@oddjob4877]

We are Pro Photographers (Nikon& Sony), but for travel and Holidays we only use Fuji XT20 & 30 and we only shoot in jpeg. The Fuji combination of low weight/size and image quality is just unbeatable.

[@MrNYCman530]

These are actually the two cameras I'm trying to choose from. I favor Fujifilm's control dials and lens selection, for the Sony a6600 I like the better battery life, better grip, and the fact that it has image stabilization. I would think the image quality of the two cameras would be similar. Currently B@H and Adorama are waiting for another shipment of the a6600's. I know Best Buy has it, but I'm going to sell some gear so I can get a store credit. In the back of my mind I'm considering the Fujifilm X-T4 but not sure if it's worth the higher price.

[@tuan056585]

Hi Tony, I do have a question on the A6600. While shooting a video, can we take a picture also? (Dual Recording). Thank.

[@jineshghost2000]

Hello Tony...thanks 4 this awesome video. You rock!!! As always. I have a budget of $1200 and currently a Nikon D5300 user with two kit lenses and 35 DX 1.8 G and 50 1.8 G. Should I move to a full frame then which one and if not then can a Sony a6600 be a better option? Also will Nikon Z50 a better option compared to Sony A6600? Please suggest. Thanks.

[@youknowwho9247]

How does the a6600's autofocus performance compare to the D500 for sports and wildlife? Is real time tracking as good as 3D tracking for sports? Does the a6600 do as good in modes comparable to group af in picking out birds against tricky backgrounds in low light?

[@LEXPIX]

The extended battery life and stabilized sensor is compelling me to get this camera. The hot shoe does not communicate with the hotshoe mic I've read.

[@MichaelKefeder]

the digital mic from Sony becomes an analogue one on the a6600. Only the A7r4 supports the fully digital signal chain so far, afaik. I wonder why they didn't upgrade the hot-shoe for the a6600 to support digital audio, but then I again I also don't understand why it doesn't have UHS-II or a usb-c port ;)

[@quite1enough]

Well, I guess I'm not gonna switch to X-T3 soon. I'm 50\50 photo video shooter, and after more than a year of savings I initially bought Sony a6400, which is a great camera, but due to some tech issues and really annoying sensor dust attraction, it wasn't suitable for me. I was on hurry with my purchase, because at the time I needed to film an interview with elderly person, which had a lot of health issues, and could probably, you know, die. And due to possibility of that interview be the final moments of the life of that person, I wanted to film that in rather good quality etc. When a6400 launched it was ridiculously overpriced in my region, about $200 more compare to officially announced prices. The initial price was roughly 1/3 of yearly wage of our family, so it was pretty substantial purchase for me. Weeks after I filmed that interview Sony announces a huge discount on a6400, which was about $158. Some stores claimed that it's gonna be until November 3rd, but discount is still there. So, just like that, even if I try to sell my a6400, I lose a pretty noticeable amount of money, and I'll still need a lot in order to buy X-T3 (kinda afraid to buy used, due to scams and frauds, which is sadly pretty common in my region). So there's that. Sorry for whining, but I feel pretty much crushed and depressed because all of that, and just wanna share my story.

[@paulbentley2709]

That's tough man good luck.

[@quite1enough]

@@paulbentley2709 thanks to the huge discount I was able to buy x-t3 finally (sold a6400). Felt like I had x-t3 all my life, ergonomics is awesome and just incompatible with Sony aps-c. Image rendition are simply brilliant and 10 bit video makes huge difference, very easy to render and very forgiving (especially when you doesn't have a chance to create a good lighting). Not to hate Sony, but their aps-c line feels more like an elaborate expensive toy, rather than proper camera. Fuji on the other hand felt like completely competent pro-body, with functions that makes so much sense that I can't understand how I lived without it before, lol

[@ogonzilla]

I'm thinking people will have made up their minds before hearing any evidence. Lol

[@mrsusan893]

Listening to Tony and Chelsea's opinions is not exactly evidence Omar

[@WesPerry]

What else is new 😏

[@klarion]

I've learned that you can't listen to youtubers if you really want to make an informed decision. Best thing to do is to borrow or rent the equipment. I've used Sony for over a decade and after I tried the Xt-2, I KNEW Sony was entirely wrong for me personally (on so many levels that it's a waste of youtube space to describe). But I didn't hear what I needed to hear from any of the youtubers I've watched.

[@romualdb5968]

it's true. but those kind of review videos are usefull for some people who are beginner or who can't try those cameras because not shop selling the cameras around (in my case). That's why i like advices, point of views, comparaisons between cameras to see pros and cons that we will not see before buying. For exemple the Q button on X-H1, X-t30 etc... Still looking for my future camera lol a graal quest it seems...the problem is to find honest reviews(not people who are paid by a brand to destroy another brand camera image or to push the sells of the brand the youtuber is paid for... By the way i like your review..always funny...and i know that you think everyone should be able to choose himself...it's true when u are enough good or have notions in photography but for someone who want to buy a first hybrid and want the best for his need and for the price he can pay it's good to have advices...

[@GeneMoretti]

Thanks Tony I will be checking out the X-T3.

[@donalmonte231]

just put 4k 60, and 10bit internally and its over! come on sony, i know you can do better!

[@PT-re2gi]

I like the fact full frame cameras are getting so close in price to apsc cameras.

[@dash3dot]

It's actually the other way around, APS-C cameras are getting closer to full frame cameras... which is sad.

[@subject8123]

dash3dot I was about to say that lol

[@1337Jogi]

@@dash3dot Why is it bad? You can chose between similarly priced cameras and have to chose between better picture quality in low light and better portability. Other than that the differences are often niche. There are cheaper APS-C and M43 cameras out there but they often lack featres and or overall picture quality compared to FF. Its just that the premium APS-C are nowadays comparable in pice and quality to FF (in good conditions)

[@damianmidro4500]

Hi, will the 6600, 2.8 70-200 & 2x Tele give me better results than my A7iii and the 200-600? That combo would be cheaper and lighter than buying the 200-600 zoom while also giving me a second smaller body.

[@ivankiefer3886]

Back in 2012 i spent 1300 on a dslr apsc with half or less capabilities than those two cameras. Still a good camera for stills.

[@vigodrakken7916]

I did that in 2007, went Full frame a couple of years later but my 40d was a very nice camera.

[@TheNotsmith]

Yes..and here i am

[@subramoniams9850]

Trying to get back to photography after a long time. COVID days is the main reason. Had migrated to Fuji from a SONY SLR fan thanks to their superzoom X-S1 and a bad back. Smitten by Fuji colors and in camera processing, later got a XE2 with the kit lens, XF55-200, XF100-400. Family events, some travel, birding etc. are my aim. Still I have a SONY SAL16-80ZA and SAL70-300G from SLR days. No takers (made a mistake selling the A580 body alone) for these lenses now. To put them back to use with a LAEA5 adaptor do you see any issues with A6600? Would these lenses benefit from the in body stabilization? A6600 is selling discounted now

[@VeranoDulce]

Thanks for the great review!🎥👍💫

[@ECPUz]

I'm a Sony shooter but I'm disappointed with the A6600's sensor. For a "flagship" it should have a newer sensor instead of the same old technology from the A6000.

[@ForTheLoveOfSuits]

It’s not the same sensor. It’s much newer but is still 24 megapixels.

[@CharlieVN]

IDE’s warm up to it if it was 999

[@ivonahumpalot538]

And have a faster shutter speed

[@klarion]

It just looks bad because Sony doesn't know how to make it look better out of the box... ;). I switched to Fuji and zero regrets. Fuji is a pleasure to use and doesn't waste time in post like Sony.

[@stevelink21]

Hi Tony. Nice comparison. As a landscape and product photographer, I use the Fuji X-T3 with some stellar sharp Fujinon XF lenses, and am, currently, quite pleased with the overall image quality, especially sharpness and detail when enlarging up to about 30" x 40". IMHO, that's the TRUE test of a camera system...whether it can maintain a level of sharpness and image detail in large prints that meets customer expectations. Granted, I realize that the larger the sensor (all else being equal), the better the image at magnification, which is one reason I'd love to see your comparision of the Sony 16-85 f/3.8 to the Fuji XF16-85 f/2.8. I've used the latter (with a solid tripod, good exposure, technique, etc.), in terms of image sharpness and detail retention. Thanks!

[@TheRealLivingWithLisa]

I have a Sony a6300 ... wondering if it's really worth going to the a6600? Or should I continue to wait and see what comes out next? I have ALL crop sensor lens ( otherwise I'd go a7c) Thoughts anyone????????

[@paulinefollett3099]

A fantastic review. Thanks for your input Tony. I always learn so much from your videos.

[@Mike3464hj]

I still have an OMD EM5 mark 1. And since image quality hasnt really improved as much, should I at least get a different brand or go with em1 mark2? I love my 12-40mm f2.8 pro m.zuiko, but I don't know if im missing more if I f i dont upgrade my camera body

[@bisaillion]

That leather case for the xt3 😍

[@tomaskapin]

i have a same for SONY .. circa 10USD .. , basic protection for body, just like a bumper :)

[@maverickball]

It's a leather case by KAZA

[@gooeytv1184]

It is expensive.

[@shibunarendranathan5592]

Got interested in the Canon R you are using ... are you using any setting that makes foucs slow? I saw some focus lag around 9:45.. I am considering a6600 mainly because of foucs tracking during video shoot...

[@rafamorroni]

Which do you prefer, XT3 or 6600?

[@bennielaars]

You make a big point of in-body stabilization yet the XT-3 (without) is your favorite camera to use.

[@genecurl6284]

I’m strongly considering buying the Fujifilm XT4 because every single issue people complain about in the XT3 have been addressed, and for what I’ll be using it for, I think it may be better for me than the Sony Alpha a7iii.

[@locker1964]

The strengthen and weaken well described. Both are great cameras, they differ technically and from the design. I think that's great, because I mainly photograph and find menus annoying, I prefer the Fuji. However, I sometimes miss IBIS with the Fuji. With the Sony I'd go straight to AIII, because the price difference isn't too high and the difference to Fuji is clear. So I can't do anything with the Sony 6600.

[@Tuan-zj3ie]

Thank Tony. I like the way you speak. It's so clear and understandable. I already Subscribed..

[@craigpurcell2919]

Tony, what is the beautiful brown leather half case / strap you are using on the X-T3?

[@TorresinhoLFC]

This body and lens is a beast of a combo but it's too expensive. I'd rather buy a7iii and a tamron 28-75 2.8

[@adkkkad]

Well, I just bought this camera (a6600) and the 28-75. Both are quite nice and very nice together

[@ronaldsetiawan1708]

Hi Tony...love to see your review of Sony's digital camera. Please make a video comparison about this a6600 vs a7iii. Just bought a6400 last April, and sometimes found that no ibis is giving me a hard time, especially shooting in low light condition. Thanks a lot.

[@jrskeide]

Size matters. Aps-c should be as compact as possible. If you need a bigger body, there is plenty good reasons to buy full frame, and few to buy aps-c.

[@thinkdee_]

Tony, I really love the leather like case you are using for the X-T3, can you share the link for it? Great video again. Thank you for making these videos.

[@bobinoregon2859]

I'm staying with APS-C. I own and love my A6500. I shoot landscapes primarily. The main advantage of full frame, unless I go to the resolution monster A7R4, is better bokeh. And better bokeh costs lots of money for quality high speed glass. I don't need bokeh. Plus FF camera and lens weigh a lot more - and cost a LOT more. I'm very much hoping Sony's next APS-C camera will be the A6700-R with 40 meg plus sensor, higher resolution EVF and dual card slots. Cheers!

[@alexaudiovisuals]

Have you ever tried a full frame camera and made a comparison? In my experience APSC will be way less sharp since there is almost no glass that will really give you 24 MP on APSC, they're just not sharp enough, that's why your 6700R concept would suck massively because no piece of glass is ever gonna resolve this highly, while on a full frame sensor the glass doesn't have to be half as good to resolve more megapixels

[@artemholstov9207]

What in particular bothers you about Fuji's mobile app? I have an x-t2 and the mobile app works very well imho. I do not really have anything to complain about: you can transfer full jpeg's or 3mp mobile versions perfect for sharing. You can control the camera remotely, browse photos and the app is maintained and updated regularly by fuji.

[@williamanderson8190]

I love it when it works but it's pretty finicky for no reason sometimes. Alot of times it just refuses to connect. Others it connects quickly and works fine. It's not something you can 100% count on.

[@AtonalMeasureRecords]

XT3 for me all day long, its more of an artists camera if that makes sense, magical pictures roll off of it rather than technically perfect, sharp and flat. Sonys are great tools, but the images from them always require post processing to make them into something, the fuji's files hardly need touching. The fuji has an organic quality no other digital mirrorless can do.

[@amanieux]

do you know which generation of chip engraving they are using ? 28nm ? it give us a critical information about processing power/heat/battery life ( for context your x86 chip in your laptop is 14nm and your arm chip in your smartphone is 7nm)

[@ResidentRocker]

Seems like an ad for sony..

[@dinkobilic9078]

you must be new to this channel :D

[@huawafabe]

No, you just have to look at the facts and see how Sony overtook all others in recent years when it's about cameras. Canon and Fuji fell asleep

[@EmtiMT]

Hi Tony, I saw you shot this video on the EOS RP at Full HD and 60 FPS, is there a particular reason or advantage in using 60 FPS…? Thanks already for a short reply :-)

[@jackharwick2080]

As always, exceptionally well done.

[@ducav2]

Don't you use the flipped screen at least to compose the shot during vlogging?

[@malangorthodontist511]

Can we get a full comparision between a7 iv and xpro 3?!

[@KingofStreet3]

At one point I was gonna switch from Fuji to Sony but the lack of customer support killed it for me. Plus I like the look and feel of my Fuji XT-2. Sure I just use it for street photography but happy where I'm at. Just gotta decide what lens I want to buy next...

[@eliasalerno8942]

"okay it lacks a joystick but you know what, you can FOCUS AND RECOMPOSE now!!"

[@mrspine4405]

Great reviews! Keep it up :)

[@GregAtlas]

I'd personally love to get a Canon EOS R, but the 6600 doens't have the 30 minute recording limit. I'd rather not buy an additional monitor to exceed that limit.

[@BR7Fan71]

I don't know what it is,but I always trust the information this channel gives us. I'm going to be a first time camera owner. Thanks to thos channel,I'm really leaning towards the a6600. I looked at Canon M6 Mark Ii,but found the adapters and different mounts to confusing.

[@RS-qr7ck]

With my Sony A6400 I focus with my thumb on the touchscreen while Iooking through the viewfinder.

[@clivealdridge7468]

You've changed the definition of a "Compact Camera" somewhat

[@thomasfeldbauer5025]

What's your opinion about a selfie screen that flips down? It should not be that hard to produce a grip with a window-frame that let you see through for vlogging? And on top of this it is better to sometimes look a little bit down when talking to people. We do this all day long if we switch from looking to eyes and mouth during conversation.

[@mardanananak]

I like the style of this video, Tony.

[@rayjackson2724]

Thank you for a great review, I own the A7iii with a Sony lens that came with the camera,and the 35mm sigma arts lens and i was wondering if the a6600 will be able to use the same lens as the a7iii .

[@tekman359]

Fuji lenses have (OIS) Optical Image Stabilization. Is this similar to the 5 axis stabilization that the Sony a600 has?

[@loudandclearmedia]

B&H currently has the A7iii for $1799, making the A6600 with it's limited, mediocre glass even tougher of a sell. If it had 4K60 that'd be different, but the 6600 seems like its just a 6500 with a firmware update and a bigger battery.

[@AdamMuise]

Do you think if we crowd-sourced the organization / grouping of the menu items for Sony they would actually implement it for us? Maybe they should just let us customize the menu in the sony app or from a website so we can upload a file to the camera to customize it. Nice review BTW.

[@videoyoplait]

What brand case is that on your x-t3?

[@bigbag23]

what mic are you using in this video? it sounds great. what mic would you recommend for canon eos? thank you!!

[@HwL01]

at this time no camera companies are making bad cameras anymore, just tat there're many bad photographers that didn't get used to their gears. anyway i hope u can review the x-pro 3. must be fun xD

[@klarion]

Yes and NO. I've gotten used to my sony gear over the last 12 years and I had ZERO regrets going with the Fuji system. So much easier to work with and the results (for me) are better and the workflow is faster.

[@nizam_sensei]

There is a major issue here: with the same amount of money you can get either a6600 with 16 55 f2. 8 or a7 iii with 16 55 f4. So stuck here.

[@alphabob7257]

If you're located in Southern California, someone is selling brand new units of the Sony a6600 for $1080 no tax. I was so happy I bought 2 and thought I'd share. Just go on OfferUp and search for a6600!

[@AllCarsUnited]

Not feeling this one. Was hoping for 10bit for video. A7s3 hopefully withing the next 20 years maybe?