Switching to FUJIFILM from SONY Full Frame!!

Go to ​www.squarespace.com/markdenney to get a free trial and 10% off your first purchase.
markdenneyphotography.com/join
☝️Subscribe For FREE Photography Tutorials & Get My Top 4 Compositional Tips
In this week’s episode, we discuss my switch to Fujifilm from Sony full frame cameras for my landscape photography. With the Fall season right around the corner I've been thinking a lot about my camera setup and wondering if it was time for me to make some changes. And the big change I've been contemplating is completely switching camera brands - which I haven't done in over 6 years. Switching camera systems is not an inexpensive thing to do nor is it something I do very often, but I think this change is going to make sense for both my photo and video needs moving forward.
In this video, I share with you what I'm most excited about in regards to completely switching over to a Fuji camera system along with what I'll miss most about no longer using Sony full frame cameras. I think Sony full frame cameras are fantastic, but over the years of using them I've come to the conclusion that my style of photography doesn't quite require the need of a full frame camera sensor to capture my images in the conditions that I typically photograph in. Long story short, I don't believe I was using the benefits of a Sony full frame camera to its fullest potential, therefore switching to an APSC crop sensor camera body from Fuji will more than suffice for me.
I hope this week's video provides you with some additional insight as to the thought track that I went through to determine if I really needed to use a full frame camera for my landscape photography and what a better alternative might be for me...Fujifilm!!!
If you enjoyed this video, please consider giving it a thumbs up and let me know what you think in the comments below - I guarantee I'll get back to ya.
Thanks for watching everyone!
-Mark D.
WATCH THESE PLAYLISTS NEXT
🔘Editing Tutorials: geni.us/Editing
🔘Composition Tips: geni.us/composition
🔘Tips & Tricks: geni.us/TipsandTricks
🔘Beginners Guide: geni.us/BeginnersGuide
FUJIFILM GEAR
🔘Video Camera: geni.us/x-t4
🔘Stills Camera: geni.us/M8SIy
🔘Wide Lens: geni.us/fuji10-24
🔘Long Lens: geni.us/longlens
PHOTO GEAR I USE
🔘Full Photo Kit: geni.us/photokit
🔘Backpack: geni.us/actionx
🔘Ballhead: geni.us/rrsbh40
🔘Gloves: geni.us/photogloves
🔘Backpack: geni.us/actionx
🔘Backpack: geni.us/explore40
🔘Filters: geni.us/nisikit
🔘Printer: geni.us/canonpro1000
🔘Backup: geni.us/gnarbox2
VIDEO GEAR I USE
🔘Full Video Kit: geni.us/fullvideokit
🔘Video Camera: geni.us/M8SIy
🔘Video Lens: geni.us/fuji10-24
🔘Microphone: geni.us/0pHRt
🔘Key Light: geni.us/aputurelight
🔘Gimbal: geni.us/DJIRoninSC
🔘Pocket Cam: geni.us/DJIosmopocket
MY ENTIRE GEAR KIT
🔘kit.co/markdenney/photo-video...
FREE TRIAL: Music & Sound Effects I Use
🔘goo.gl/Qh9scf
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. I earn a small commission on the above links if you decide to purchase the item at no additional charge to you.
#landscapephotography #fujifilm
*LETS CONNECT*
Newsletter: markdenneyphotography.com/join
Instagram: / markdenneyphoto
Facebook: / markdenneyphoto
Twitter: / markdenneyphoto

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

When was the last time you switched camera systems?

[@patrickyott]

I switch every week or so -- in my head! But I've invested a lot in my Canon 5D IV setup...

[@chriswardphotobooks]

Probably when I switched from Praktica to Nikon sometime around 1990

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

@@chriswardphotobooks Oh nice!

[@brianargyle7344]

Jan 2015 - after visiting and talking to people at the Sony booth at CES (across from the Canon booth, where I normally spent a lot of time ) I returned home and bought an A6000 and an adapter to use Canon lenses. Now, I am on my fifth Sony body purchased (an A7R IV, I only have one camera) and the only remnants from Canon days is the adapter. Looking back, I think it was a good decision at that time. Certainly, the move to mirrorless has proven to be the direction for pretty much all the manufacturers.

[@TheWillRogers]

Does it have to be a brand to count as switching systems? I went from a Nikon Coolpix (L120?) to a Nikon D3100 last winter. That's probably a substantial enough change.

[@brianmerrill6891]

I shot Nikon for 26 years. Won't say a bad thing about the brand, but in the end, those big cameras and FF lenses were just too much, and I just wasn't carrying them any more. I bought a Fujifilm a few years ago for goofing around, travel, happy snaps. But it was enough to hook me. Long story short, I just sold my D850 and all Nikon lenses. Yeah, FF on paper is better - faster glass, more resolution, so on. But real photography isn't about test sheets and lab results. It's about getting out there, making images and enjoying the process. Helps to have a camera you can't resist picking up.

[@jarek916]

Very well said and same here fall in love with my X-pro2 and X-h1. I Just finally let go off my Nikon gear whole line off glass and D 810 body . I was resisting for long time to let go but the thing is every time I went out for photo session I always pick up Fuji and Nikon was just siting on my table collection dust. D810 is very nice camera but I just wasn't used any more so I sold it, some one else can enjoy that camera before it gets to old. Love Fuji glass and they cameras are just pleasure to use.

[@jonesnax]

Wow, you just wrote my comment! Same here. My D750 is going to ebay soon. Just found I was slowly using my Fuji more + liked the pictures more. No system is perfect + I will miss the lower light capabilities of FF. But boy, does that nikon feel like a beast now after using Fuji !!

[@rimonawad5721]

Sony a7iii with the tamron 28-70 f2.8 is a little lighter than the same fuji setup with 2.8 zoom lens they have. But you still won't get the same look, because f2.8 would turn to a f4 equivalent lens. However, if you tend to shoot with the lighter primes they have, Fuji can become considerably lighter. But if you like to shoot with a high quality zoom lens, fullframe will give you the better results.

[@brianmerrill6891]

@@rimonawad5721 And what "better results" are we talking about here? Better storytelling? Better composition? Better connection with the subject? Better emotive qualities? I don't think full-frame has any advantage there. When you say "better" it seems you're talking about tech specs and lab results, not the artistic aspects of photography. I appreciate your comment, I get what you're saying, but I think you missed the point of my post. I said "FF on paper is better..." so yeah, I get where you're coming from. If tech data is what drives your photography, then there is always a better "on paper" solution. There is always a setup that is lighter, sharper, faster, higher resolution and so on. I have a holy trinity of camera needs: Portable size, image quality and an enticing user experience. I don't need each one to be perfect, as long as the three are in a good balance, and Fujifilm does that for me. Are there compromises? Of course. But they're compromises that fall within tolerances I can accept to make photos the way I want to make them. Fujifilm doesn't do it for you? No worries. That's why there are other brands out there. Shoot with that you like, just don't tell others they should use a certain setup because of what some spec sheet says. Happy shooting.

[@rimonawad5721]

​@@brianmerrill6891 Hey buddy, I never told you you should use a certain setup because of what the spec sheet says:) I just pointed out that the weight argument of fullframe does not necessarily always hold up in today's mirrorless cameras. If you feel like the shooting experience is more important than specs, to create a certain image that's fine! I see you are a well seasoned photographer, and your photos look great. You certainly don't need anyone telling you what you need to shoot with. I love the versatility of a 24-70 f2.8, it's 90% on my camera, and I've taken my greatest images with it. I just wish APS-c would have a comparable lens, but so far I haven't found anything. I tried shooting primes for a year, but for the kind of photography I do, I tend to miss a lot of shots. For me, the camera is more a tool. The artistic and emotional process is in the mind, not in the camera I use. Hence, when I choose I body, I want it to give me the optimal results. Although it might be a slight difference, it is important to me:) That being said, I still think Fuji is an amazing system, and if I were actively looking for an aps-c body, I would definitely go for a Fuji. Happy shooting too my friend!

[@ivandimarco2004]

I was a Sony shooter, then my gear got stolen during a trip in Italy. Went for Fuji as a replacement cause I couldn't afford a new Sony FF equipment and I did not regret it. Image quality is superb and, if you plan to print big you can always shoot multiple images and combine them later on in PP to get a high resolution image. Dynamic range is overrated these days: everyone talks about it and look for it when on the market for a new camera. I personally don't think too much about dynamic range (maybe because I started my photography journey on film): I just look at the histogram and if there are issues with shadows or highlights I just bracket. Simple! Enjoy your new Fuji kit (lenses are top level) and don't think too much about technical aspects when in the field. Good photographers take great images whatever the camera.

[@jeffsinger5789]

Mark your videos have been a huge help to me as I’ve learned the art of Landscape photography, and your use of the Sony A7R series, the 100-400GM, and 16-35GM were a big driver behind my decision to get those same lenses (which I’ve loved). It’s been awesome knowing I can turn to your videos and see how you shoot scenes with the same gear I use. I’m sorry to see you leave the Sony system, but I really hope you enjoy your new setup! Thanks for all your wonderful content, I look forward to seeing what you do with the new gear.

[@hidekigomi]

You have sparkles in your eyes, that's the most important thing for photographers, I think. Happy for you!

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thanks so much!

[@tofzmail]

I can't wait to see your shots from the Fuji system. You are the first professional photographer, who switched to a APS-C from Full Frame (of course I haven't seen all of them), and I think this is awesome, because now you can show the people that a full frame camera is not the most important to capture amazing photos. I hope soon we will see some results from the XT-3. Great video as usual. :)

[@DavcoMediaTV]

I switched from Canon full frame to Fuji a couple of years ago primarily due to size/weight. I'm enjoying photography so much more now. The tactileness of Fuji cameras is so good. I now have three bodies and eight lenses and will no doubt add more. Loved my Canon gear but love my Fuji gear more.

[@supersizejm]

I just switched from Canon 70d to Fuji XT3 a couple months ago and couldn't be happier. The Fuji made me excited to get out and shoot again. Great video!

[@Topscura]

Welcome to the Fuji system. Looking forward to seeing what you create while transition, and paralleling it with my own experience (switched 6 months ago). Thanks for the great content Mark.

[@alexaw9681]

These are almost the same exact reasons I’m switching from the Sony A7rii to the Fuji XT-3!! I had been debating for months because people keep telling me I’ll miss the sensor, but I rented the XT-3 a few weeks and loved it! (Besides, I’ve even done some astrophotography that met my needs on a 1 inch sensor. I love a challenge.)

[@lisarobertson7011]

looking forward to hearing more about your fuji experience Mark - I use the X-T2 as my second system and love it!

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

That's great to hear Lisa - I've really enjoyed using my X-T3 as well!

[@johnburrow4124]

Welcome to the Fujifilm family. I have been shooting Fuji for a while now, and it is a pleasure to use the camera. Keep shooting!

[@vinapiximages]

Hey Mark... I did the same almost two years ago (moving from Nikon D850) and not only do I not regret it, it's one of the best moves I've made! APS-C does not have all the advantages of the so-called 'full frame' systems, but the very nature and usability of the X series has meant that I have reached for my camera in countless situations where I would just not have bothered before... and taken some fantastic photographs. Look forward to not only improved user experience, but also improved productivity! Great choice! Good luck and happy shooting!

[@shanesmithphotography]

Ive just changed from Nikon to Fujifilm XT3 about a month ago and the experience of using the Fuji is lightyears ahead of using Nikon IMO. My kit is the XT2, 10-24mm, 18-55mm & the 50-230mm. Yet again another awesome video Mark, VERY much appreciated 👍

[@m.stewart8094]

Had FF envy and flirted with Canon RP and RF lenses but just sold them all. Lenses Too big. Sticking with Fuji. The X H1 is more than enough for me.

[@rocketmanab]

You nailed it for me Mark...the Fuji is just so fun to use. It makes me want to go out and shoot, and to me that's the biggest thing - all the specs kinda go out the window at that point. I had a crop sensor Sony before, and I just couldn't deal with all the menu diving. Excited about your channel going forward!

[@nosimosi4994]

Oh I’m so happy to see that! I own a Fuji xt3 with the kit 15-55 mm and 10-24mm. Right now i’m think about getting the 50-140 or the 55-200! I’m looking forward to see some awesome content. You are my favorite landscape fotography KZbinr and now, I’m getting even more excited to see new content! Enjoy the new experiences !

[@luispaxtor2680]

Both systems have their pros and cons. I love both of them.

[@carleckhardt4701]

As a fellow Fuji user I will be following your content even more.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Great to hear Carl - thank you!

[@benbatz58]

Because of this review maybe I will not push to go to Full Frame..i came from Xt20 then xt2 and now i have the xt4 but im thinking to go to full frame.. so far your review is the best so far.. thank you..

[@ZackLitchfield]

Really excited to see what you've got coming with the new setup. I've been wondering if I would eventually need to get a full-frame camera, so seeing you switch over to an APS-C sensor helps answer that for me. Great video as always!!

[@bkscanlon]

I made the switch about four years back from Canon 6D to Fuji and haven't regretted it. The lens size is so much better and if you're not doing billboards :). For me, it was size, but also the tactile feels of the dials, rugged nature, super small primes that you can easily throw in a bag, and really great results. I have a 45" print from an X-T2 hanging on my wall. You can get the Fuji down so small. Oh, you're gonna love the 50-140!

[@thanosgkouvas]

Glad hearing that Mark! I took the same exact decision six months ago (from sony ff to xt3) and never regret it! Check out the perfect xf 100-400 (150-600 ff equiv) . Paired with the 10-24 is a killer combo!

[@SteveMellorPhotography]

I’ve just picked up the 100-400. It’s my first proper wildlife lens and I couldn’t be more thrilled with it 😁

[@yokozua80]

I did the exact same thing. Switched from Sony to Fuji for all the reasons stated. The camera bodies weren't all that different in size but the glass is what was killing me to lug around. There's just no way around the weight of the glass on a FF sensor. I also questioned if I was really taking advantage or even really needed all that the FF sensor offered. I decided to do a test run on the Fuji X-T3 and was blown away at the IQ... from a crop?!?! The added bonus was that extra fun factor that I heard so much about. I love the analog feel of making the images with Fuji. And for quick run and gun photos of the family, the jpeg film sims are outstanding and can't be beat. Quickly sold all of my Sony gear and a year later have the X-T3, X-Pro3, X-Pro1 and a boat load of glass. Really excited to see what a real pro does with the Fuji system. I'm sure I won't be able to tell your Sony files from your Fuji files. You should do a "Can you tell" video to illustrate you can achieve results on a crop sensor that are just as good as a FF sensor.

[@HB-oi6tp]

Most of the image quality lies in the lens(es) and not the camera/sensor. The main benefits you get with a larger sensor are more dynamic range, lower noise at high ISO and potentially a higher resolution. This of course means that a larger sensor can give you better results in certain situations, but else the lens is far more important for image quality. I do really wish people would stop living in the myth that a larger sensor is always better...

[@KertArt]

@@HB-oi6tp it's true, I got 56mm f 1.4 for my sony a6000 and I impressed how more details i got compare to zoom lens 18-105f4 with this 7 years old camera body

[@catlena419]

So excited to learn more about your experience using the Fujifilm lenses. Looking forward to your new content.

[@userCamHill]

Great and thoughtful content as always, Mark. I love how your cut-aways (like the waterfall, and the mountainscape at night) include diegetic sound. Such a small detail, but I love that stylistic seasoning.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Much appreciated - thank you!

[@mattsiler7418]

How about 5-6 month review on your switch to Fuji...Would love to hear your thoughts.

[@nickmatthews4939]

I've been with Fujifilm since the XT1 (currently on the XT3) As you say they are fun to shoot with and the image colour/quality are tops. I try to frame my images in camera, rather than crop. Photographers who regularly crop might like to consider Topaz Labs AI sharpening, it's an incredible piece of software which can now work in Lightroom. A 👍🏼s up from me

[@briansmith8507]

Welcome to the club! I also switched for similar reasons; smaller gear (packing wise) while hiking, and no need for the bleeding edge results FF can get you (No large prints or sales etc). For what it is worth, I'm sure you'll love the 50-140, but keep your eye out as Fuji is rumored to release a 70-300 (105-450 FF) lens in the coming months. That plus the 10-24 and the 35mm prime is my anticipated ideal landscape kit!

[@robertbellomy2]

I’ve been a Fujifilm user for several years now. I purchased the Fujifilm 50-140 for my daughter’s engagement and bridal photos, the photos turned out amazing! One feature I really like about the lens is that the zoom is all internal, meaning it does not extend. Anyway I hope you enjoy your new system!

[@casperghst42]

I was/am a Nikon FF person, and I did the switch few months ago, but I’m looking forward to the updated Nikon Z7 and the new Z lenses coming out - I can’t really get used to the Fuji (and I use it a lot). You could save even more weight with the Fuji 55-200mm which is almost as good as the 55-140 f/2.8 (Andy Mumford did a comparison last year).

[@sedosan17]

I am a Fuji X and Nikon Z user, and I too prefer Nikon's ergonomics. I'm sure a Z7 would feel right in your hands if you are coming from a Nikon DSLR :)

[@casperghst42]

@@sedosan17 I know, but I'm holding off until they release the 70-220 f/4 or 100-400 for Z mount. Also I want to see what the Z8 will bring - I miss the 10 pin port on the Z6/7 and some of the buttons. Also the GFX 100S is also very interesting - but the price, the price - and weight.

[@fotografi4fun]

Switched from Canon to Fujifilm in April. Welcome to the club 😊👍🏻

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thank ya friend - super excited about it!

[@fotografi4fun]

Mark Denney Looking forward to watch this video later 😊

[@penbphotography]

How is that going for you? I have a Canon 6d 7years old I so would like to get a Fujifilm xt4 as my needs in photography has changed.

[@fotografi4fun]

Pen B. I will start to say that I´m only an enthusiast. Not doing any payed jobs. I mainly shooting some landscapes, sunsets and of course family pictures. I kept my Canon M50, but I rarely use it. I love the shooting experiance with Fuji, and the sensor is handeling low light much better than the M50. The Fuji lenses are awesome. I went with the X-T3 because I like the screen better than on the 4. I don´t need IBIS as I never ever shoot video. I also picked up an X-E3 that I´m usually always keep in my backpack. My favorite allaround lens is the 16-80 f4. The OIS is amazing, and it´s super sharp. I shoot in RAW, but I´m starting to look into the film simulations. The colors in the jpeg´s is amazing.

[@penbphotography]

@@fotografi4fun Thank you for your advice it is helpful I have an x-E1 for fun I love it I think I'm going to save my pennies for an X-T4.And keep my Canon 6d 😬

[@lanche86]

Today I purchased 100-400 XF and I can’t stop shooting :) There is something with Fuji, that makes us love it. Good luck with your switch Mark!

[@Steezicus]

Great channel. I like your honesty I see in the videos I have watched so far. Hopefully you are enjoying your Fuji set up. I switched from Nikon FF to Fuji as well and it took some time to be happy about it, but I am now. The size and weight are so much better!

[@thogn]

You should also switch to Capture One as your editing software when using a Fujifilm camera. It works much better with the Fujifilm RAW files.

[@PabloB888]

I bought Fuji X-T30 one year ago and I'm still amazed because this small APS-C camara can absolutely rival many full frame cameras. Noise is very low even on very high ISO and color reproduction is literally perfect. Fuji X-trans sensor is unique, but it has one flaw. Because of it demosaicing results arnt the best, so I have to use "enchance details" function in lightroom each time I want to get the best results. Machine learning demosaicing clearly improves fine details and colors when viewing photos at 1:1 zoom.

[@Ev0ktube]

There’s a lot of debate on that. You could try the free version of capture one for Fujifilm, I believe Lightroom still sucks a bit rendering Fuji files!

[@shaunriome6273]

Use capture one like every other Fuji user

[@PabloB888]

@@shaunriome6273 I have tried capture one and another one fuji x-raw studio, but I still prefer Lightroom simply because I got used to it. Yes, Capture One renders fuji (x-trans sensor) RAWs better compared to Lightroom (sharpening filter has less artifacts), but only with default settings. With ML demosaicing in Lightroom fuji RAWs looks even a little bit better compared to Capture One RAWs. I also have all fuji film simulation modes in lightroom, so I'm not missing anything. People say capture one has more functions than LR (advanced colour tools, layers), but I'm doing most of my editing work with way more advanced photoshop anyway (I'm only using lightroom for very basic adjustments).

[@OutdoorActionPhoto]

Perfect timing! I’m looking to upgrade my kit from a somewhat entry level Nikon. Fuji has been getting a lot of love, and I really like the settings dials. XT3 is definitely on my radar.

[@juddnelson9582]

Great to hear your coming over to Fuji. Welcome! I’ll buy your Shimoda 50L. I really enjoy your insights and content!

[@klipk7296]

11:12 holy hell that looks surreal, nice job

[@lennarthalvarsson399]

I don´t think you will regret, Mark. Switched as a landscape and wildlife photographer from Canon (5DsR and 1DX) to Fujifilm X-series (X-T3 and 4) during the last year. The size, the weight, the intuitivity. And the colours are amazing. I´m now moving from LR to Capture One just as well.👍

[@Sidecontrol1234]

Capture One is lovely

[@TomGibson7777TG]

Going to C1, LMK how the library system works as one reason I still use LR

[@lennarthalvarsson399]

FrenchEOS 5DSR is still a fantastic camera. But to get most out of it you should have good qualitee on the lenses. And a good tripod.

[@edwinshank7865]

Hey Mark, excellent video as usual. I made the leap to Fuji about two years ago, first buying the XT-2 and the holy trinity of their lenses. 10-24, 18-55 and the 55-200. Last year I swapped the XT-2 for the XT-3 body and have added a few more lenses like the 60mm Macro and an 18mm prime. I love the Fuji lenses for their build quality and aperture ring (on most). But most importantly I totally agree with your sentiment the Fuji gear is so fun to use. Glad you’ve made the switch. Thanks, Mark.

[@klaus_s]

Hi Mark, welcome to the club. I switched 3years ago from Nikon to Fuji (X-T2). I never regret my decision. Using also the 10-24 and the 50-140 and additional the 18-55. So have fun with your new equipment. Stay save and well. 😎📷

[@matthewacri5607]

Hey Mark, I've been a Fuji user for almost 2 years now and I have no regrets when I switched over from Canon. I started with the XT-20 and paired it with their 16-55mm lens which is a fantastic lens and I got great results from such a small camera. I recently upgraded to the XT-4 and in the short time I've had it I've been impressed. Having IBIS is definitely a plus in my book.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

I've heard mixed reviews about the IBIS on the X-T4, but my initial tests with have been pretty solid!

[@stephenhadeenphotography]

Would you guys say it is a must (the IBIS) if I shoot with a tripod almost always? In fact cant remember the last time I didn’t use a tripod. The battery life does appeal to me though. I forget what else the XT-4 has over the XT-3. Need to read about that again. It seems like for the price is the XT-4 body only I can pick up an XT-3 plus a lens so that is enticing.

[@timothylinn]

Steve Hadeen The X-T3 is lighter, less expensive, handles heat better, and has what most stills shooters seem to consider a superior rear LCD design. That last one is often the feature that pushes you in one direction or the other. In addition to IBIS, a bigger battery, and flippy screen, the X-T4 has a couple additional film sims (incl the very popular Classic Negative), add’l focus stacking functionality, and it focuses in lower light. It also has completely separate photo and video menus. If Fuji ever gets around to updating the X-T3’s firmware, most of the software-based differences should go away.

[@alifashrareza]

Man 16-55 really come to life when paired with IBIS! I got a xh1 for 700$ and i got 16-55 on a discount 3 months ago.

[@timothylinn]

@@alifashrareza Yes, the 16-55 is on my X-T3 90% of the time and it never disappoints.

[@franciscorguez986]

Hi Marc, good morning, I made the exact same change , from the Sony A RII and AII to the Fujifilm X3. I no longer remember Sony cameras. I prefer the color and texture of the Fujifilm. I think it was a brave and accepted decision. And in the long run economically much more profitable. If I had an interest in improving the resolution directly, I would buy the 50 R from Fujifilm, without going through Sony's fullframe format, which is much more expensive than the Fujifilm format, which is doing very well at this point. In terms of dynamic range, the Fujifilm XT system is higher than the Sony Fullframe system and has absolutely wonderful macro optics like the XF 80. the construction is solid too. for me the quality of the new Sony R4 does not justify its cost.

[@dazza81]

I recently made the switch in the other direction, from a Canon 77D to a Sony A7RIII, mainly because I wanted more flexibility when cropping and better low light performance. I really love the way Fuji cameras look and handle (I was thinking of getting an X100V for everyday use), and the images look stunning, so I am sure that you will be taking great photos with this new setup. Good luck with it. I look forward to seeing your photos.

[@eddiec4456]

I knew you will become a super fan of Fujifilm one day since the first time you had a X-T3. Finally this day come! Welcome to Fujifilm family. Thank you for sharing. So inspiring.

[@Azn_Bran]

Wow! Not expected. I thought about this myself but decided to stick with Sony due to the amazing 3rd party glass that is very affordable and 98% as good as the GM stuff. That said, I did really think about the Fuji Medium format. As for lighter smaller lenses. I went with the Tamron 17-28mm for this exact reason. Its nearly as good as the 16-35mm GM but its tiny next to it. Also the Sigma 100-400mm is an excellent alternative to the 100-400mm GM and it's smaller and lighter as well. If the lens size was the main driver for you, those might be another way to go.

[@vanessagr_photo]

What do you mean lens as good as gm stuff? Tamron? Sigma? Etc... Give me your reason sir, i used fuji xt 4 want to change in full frame camera, i like fuji cause ergonomic and price lens, is affordeble

[@JonathanGerstner]

4:18 I feel that😂 (as a fuji x-t30 user )

[@juancarlosguzman2827]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Last year I left Nikon full frame D750 and switched to the Fuji X-T3 and I am very Happy with my photography the Nikon 24-70 mm was literally 2 times the size of the Fuji 18-55mm kit lens that is super good, an recently bought the Fuji 10-24 that should arrived next week. Man so far I am very satisfy with Fuji cameras and something that you will love is the in camera focus stacking features make lot easier!

[@larrywright80233]

When the time came for me to switch from my Nikon DSLR to Mirrorless I rented a Nikon Z7, a Sony A7R4, and a Fuji XT-3 over the course of three weekends. I was convinced I would go with the Fuji because all of the manual controls but I just couldn't get used to them and the grip was way to small for me. I'm sure I could have gotten used to it but I haven't regretted my A7R4 purchase once. I paired it with an a6400 as a backup and couldn't be any happier.

[@diba4645]

I switched to Fuji using mostly Nikon two years ago. At that time I totally had lost the joy on photography. I started with the small X-E3 and the kit lens and using it during travel and holidays I got back to having fun carrying gear with me. I improved my skills significantly and added a X-H1 body and a whole bunch of lenses to that gear. Fuji brought me back to photography.

[@yoginwidhi6676]

Yes, XE3 is a small beautiful fuji cam, im start in fuji ecosystem with that too..

[@vitorazinheira2195]

Same for myself/ Travel I Got XE3 XT20 10-24 and 18-55 and 100-400 for long shots, love it.

[@stephenhadeenphotography]

Mark: I’d be curious to hear your experience with LR with the Fujifilm with its “worm” issues. I was under the impression that that got repaired somehow (firmware update maybe?) but I’m still reading here that people are switching to Capture One because of that.

[@jacobh5817]

Steve Hadeen: it has certainly become better over the last few years, but still I find Capture One to be visibly better re. artefacts but also in the interpretation of Fuji’s film simulations. I have less post processing work with C1

[@GeoffGrant2010]

Thanks. This was helpful. I'm a Fuji user since the XT1, but occasionally I have pixel envy. I love the size and quality of my Fuji kit and the way it encourages my creativity!

[@marcoallasio7790]

Welcome to the family! Hope you will enjoy shooting with Fuji like i do!

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thanks so much!

[@BB-ft6nd]

This is the exact problem I’m dealing with at this moment.

[@fuzztography8019]

Very exciting. I love your photos and I am looking forward to seeing what you do with the Fuji.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thanks so much!

[@jimtrull683]

Mark welcome to the Fuji system. I shoot both Fuji and Nikon mirrorless systems but I agree that shooting with the Fuji is more fun. If I have far to hike the Fuji setup is much easier on my back as well. One person you may want to check out is Andy Mumford who switched a few years ago to the Fuji system from full frame. He is a landscape shooter and workshop leader. I have found his videos on his experiences with Fuji to be very helpful. His images from his Fuji system are stellar. I hope you enjoy the switch.

[@moisescugat3948]

I am an Olympus user and I am a landscape photographer... all these reasons you are talking about are the main reason why I use Olympus System.And I can shoot 50 and 80 Mpx resolutions if the frame is not mooving. (With less noise and chromatic aberrations that any FF). I am really happy with it

[@HolgerBuerger]

Can you elaborate? How do you shoot 50/80 Mpx with a medium format camera (without moving frame)? Just curiose.

[@moisescugat3948]

Holger Buerger it is a feature of Olympus cameras... it takes several photos and combines them to achieve a high resolution photo. Also decrease the noise and improves the quality of the color because it doesn’t use the Bayer Filter. The problem is you can’t get good results if the subject is moving.

[@Herkulez1981]

To be fair while Olympus high tea mode is pretty excellent for what it does it’s not just as good as a high mp fff camera. Much more smodgy (?)! And noisy that’s why I didn’t go to Olympus but instead a high mp ff

[@moisescugat3948]

Johan S depend on what you do it is much better that any high Mpx... if you shoot moving objects you simply cannot use it. If your subject it is still it is better since it has less noise and it bypass the Bayer Filter.

[@moisescugat3948]

Johan S and you can investigate a few. Yes. Less noise that any FF camera.

[@bjure8111]

I'm having the same thoughts too... I'm shooting with the Sony A73 now, and the biggest issue is long reach teles. Sure there is the excellent huuge 200-600mm lens, but that compared the crop 100-400mm Fuji lens is just duh... And the price of that 10-24 fuji lens is great for what it is. My biggest concern is, will I miss Sonys AF tracking and especially animal eye af....

[@hansn.433]

From a technical perspective, the a7riv with a 100-400 (Like the new Sigma one) will give you the exact Same results at the same weight, as the Fuji with its quiet aged 100-400. I switched to Fuji and i Love using the Gear, but i am Always a Bit disapointed, when looking at the results. Coming from and still using a D810

[@trym2121]

If you're all about telephoto then you should give em1 iii and telephoto lens a try.

[@americanpaintciudadjuarez2309]

You are definetely going to miss Sony auto focus, no body beats Sony in that regard, Fuji cameras, altough they have great specs, its mainly about the joy they bring when shooting.

[@heelfan78]

Hey Mark. I’m going to be very anxious to hear your stories moving forward; I too struggle with the weight in my camera pack. I’m not familiar with the Fuji system, but your comment about not missing the electronic selection for the dials on the Fuji - does that imply the Fuji system runs to a manual mode vs. having dynamic changes when you set your ISO, aperture, or shutter speed? Second, how do YOU go about selling your equipment? What service / method do you recommend? Keep up the great videos and training. You are such a great, great asset to the photo community!! Thank you for helping so many of us out here.

[@babdoc1]

Mark, you’ll love that 50-140. It’s definitely my favorite lens. I’ve been trying to decide if I need the extra reach of the 100-400 or of the TC would be an adequate solution. I think I could happily get by with the 16-80 and the 100-400 and be about the weight I lug around with the 16-55 and 50-140 (the 10-24 usually stays at home). Anyway, enjoy the new gear!

[@Byaheronghilason]

I ddnt change cam sys. My very first is fujifilm!😊

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

The most cost effective approach!!

[@thomassch.4110]

I was also thinking about switching over to Fuji from Sony FF. My reason mainly was that I assumed to save a quite bit of weight going APSC but when I was comparing the high end Fuji lenses 8-16 2.8, 16-55 2.8 and 100-400 4.5-5.6 to my current setup 16-35 2.8 GM, 24-105 4.0 G and 100-400 4.5-5.6 GM it ended up 2835g for Fuji to 2738g for Sony 😱 -> So when you now also consider the better light capturing capabilites of FF and all so other advantages like smaller DOF doing portraits I'm definitely sticking with Sony I'm mainly using the 16-35 on my A7R3 while having the 24-105 on my a6500 -> this way I'm covering 16mm - 157.5mm without switching lenses and always being able to use both for quite reasonable video quality 👌 The special look of X-Trans, the cool retro looks and the extremity versatile operating concept of the Fuji is really tempting though 🤔

[@leafXIV]

This is what I don't get.I find many people say that's the advantage of apsc, price not being an issue, is all about the weight. Then, I start discovering more and more people say there's not that much difference in price between Sony lenses and Fujifilm lenses, and not that much difference in size and weight either! I'm really confused. I don't see why I should invest loads of bucks in the fuji system if all this is true.

[@berndrabe5041]

That is the point. Many people compare FF f/2.8 to Aps-c f/4. The conclusion they do is that Aps-c Lenses are lightweight and cheap. But it is like comparing apples and bananas. If you don‘t need the light on your sensor you will be happy with any Aps-c Kitlens which is lightweight, cheap and small. But if you are really interested in doing stuff with DOF or low light situation you will consider having a fast Fuji lens which is definitely not lightweight, cheap and small. For example Fuji 16-55 f/2.8 is like 24-70 f/4.2 in FF and a Fuji 16-80 f/4 is like a 24-120 f/6 FF! Btw i use both systems: Fuji X T3 and Canon 6DII.

[@anamushabbir4086]

Best of luck. Will be waiting for your ‘experience vs expectations’ video on your new set up.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thanks so much - I'll be sure to keep you updated!

[@thirdson2441]

Hey Mark...I have been using Fuji for about four years now. Great choice! I am on the verge of buying an X-T4. I am looking forward to see how you get on with this camera. Thanks for a clear thought process on how you decided going forward.

[@jacobh5817]

I’m actually in the process of switching the other way ;-). For street work I’ll still use a Fuji X100V, but my X-H1 and X-Pro2 with a total of 9 XF lenses will go in favor of an A7RIV. Not only I was struck by the image quality of the FF sensor, but also the quality and feel of Sony, Zeiss and Sigma glass is amazing. Though I really love the Fuji tactile feel and looks, I’ve been let down by the long-term durability of some of the gear.

[@morgan18821]

Welcome to Fujifilm, I switched from Canon full frame with all L lenses and do not regret it or miss it👍🏻✌🏻

[@lucianappaschoal]

Really? Cause I'm thinking about to buy a XT-4 and forget my 5D Mark III. I want something that I can carry on everywhere.

[@tographyfeelz8039]

Good luck Mark! I've shot with Fuji professionally for 2 years now and have not missed full frame once!! Enjoy the switch, oh, and let us know how that 50-140 is 😍 tempted by that lens myself!!!

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thanks so much!

[@niftytwo]

WOW.... What a change... We will still follow your tutorials Mark no matter what you shoot with.. It is a big event to change systems.. I've been with Sony for 4 years and have looked at change but my mind is saying no.. If Sony's menu system didn't mess my head up every time I attempt to set up the configuarable buttons ???? We will keep in touch with your new venture Mark... Neville. J...

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

You're the best!!

[@davidwalker2402]

There is something about Fuji , when you hold them you just want to shoot. Good luck with the new equipment the 50/140 is exceptional, I must get a 1.4 extender . Good luck and stay safe, thanks for all the exceptional videos you produce.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Glad to do it David and many thanks to you for watching them!

[@dalkapur]

To me that is the biggest pro. I had a Canon 6D FF for many years, and was very happy with the files it put out. But I never loved it, never reached for it willingly, and always reverted to my X100T and then F for everyday shooting. I swapped my main camera system to the XT3, and got the lightweight landscape trinity (10-24, 18-55 and 55-200), and totally love the experience. I would say one thing though. There are times, maybe 10% of shots, when I look at a printed image and reckon FF would have made a better shot of it in terms of maximising detail. Good luck with your new kit, Mark.

[@bobby350z]

Agree. I have GFX and A7rIV and I always reach out for the GFX unless I need to shoot action where eye AF of Sony will help.

[@stevemckenzie4731]

Yep, that's it. Fuji cameras transcend the natural world. There's just something about them ... Personally, I think it's the small sensor and hipster dufus retro dials.

[@dalkapur]

@@stevemckenzie4731 Ha. Unless you're my age, grew up with manual film cameras, and hate PASM with a vengence. It just feels how it should always be ;-)

[@thepokemonchannel7797]

And some so called "experts" say crop sensors aren't enough for landscapes! I was confused between a73 and fuji xt3, now i know what to do! Thanx 😈😈

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

,

[@thepokemonchannel7797]

@@MarkDenneyPhoto 😏that was just for reserving my spot!

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Sure thing - hope you enjoyed the video!

[@NelsonSerrano]

And there are also landscape photographers who use a micro 4/3 (Panasonic G9 generally) without problem and who also print the photos. In the end it is what works best for you

[@marcpilon4585]

Will will crop a lot? Will you print big? If not go with Fuji much more enjoyable. Those Sony menus drive you crazy

[@KristiGay1973]

I switched from Canon FF to Fuji APS-C in October. I absolutely adore my Fuji gear!

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

I'm sooooo looking forward to this switch!

[@joshuah5447]

great video! Sound arguments to switch systems. I always thought I wanted a full frame camera, but as time goes on I just don't know if I'd be using it to its fullest capabilities. I 've been using the Sony a-6000 for the past several years (maybe 5) and haven't used anything else since then.

[@slhibbs]

I have both sony and fuji. I found no one camera will do everything, i would miss my sony if i sold it

[@dunghoang-gf9vr]

Stephen Hibbs don’t sell your gears.Just try out other system, if you like them then buy.You will never regret.

[@Thmz9]

The low-light performance of full-frame is often overrated, especially for typical landscape: if you're limited by depth of field, sensor size does not matter for noise performance. F4 on full frame is approximately the same depth of field as F2.8 on APS-C, therefore you can lower the ISO on the APS-C by one stop for the same depth of field. So unless you're shooting everything wide open, it does not matter (what matters is sensor generation/quality, and the sensors of Fuji are very good). Only dynamic range might be 1 stop better for FF with the same sensor tech, but if that is a problem you should bracket anyway. And for example the full-frame Canon EOS R has worse dynamic range than the Fuji due to fairly outdated sensor tech. And with the excellent IBIS (or OIS in some lenses) you can get longer shutter times anyway. You can also consider the rumoured Fuji 70-300mm F4-5.6 which will be more lightweight than the 50-140 (+TC) for more range (coming before March 2021 I think) or even the older but very good 55-200mm. Happy shooting!

[@mattsiler7418]

@@jmarks005 What's your post processing workflow look like? I hate the way LR handles the x-trans files but also hate having to use Iridient to convert and the file sizes get massive jumping from 40ish mb to 85-125mb depending on iridient settings. Don't want to change my workflow over to Capture One either so I am always at a loss for post with my Fuji XT2.

[@johnpouw3352]

Couldn't agree more with your decision process Mark, recently switched from EOS R to X-T3, sold my L series lenses and purchased the 10-24mm, 55-200mm, 35mm as well as the standard kit 18-5mm which is fantastic. One lens I cannot recommend highly enough is the Samyang 12mm F2, honestly it is brilliant corner to corner, easy to focus and so, so small. I bought it for astro but have used it for street etc as well as landscape. Enjoyed the video and like you I love the manual and tactile feel of the Fuji, makes me slow down, think and enjoy the experience. Cheers John Pouw

[@szangolini]

Hi Mark, I did the same switch some months ago coming from Nikon system. I landed on an XT3 with 10-24 and 55-200. I picked the 55-200 for an even lighter setup. The image quality of this lens is fantastic too. I think you won't regret switching. For the near future I will replace my second body (XT20) with the XT4 to improve the quality of movies.

[@davidjames4915]

11:05 Sensor size and low light is one of the most misunderstood aspects of photography. It's not the larger sensor size per se that improves low light performance - it's the larger pixel size typically found on larger sensors. Pixels are where the light is actually being gathered; sensors are just arrays of pixels. Larger pixels with their greater area collect more photons and thus have better SNR than smaller pixels, but this is coming at the expense of resolution (if you imagine a pixel the size of the sensor itself, it'll have superb SNR but no resolution at all). A larger sensor is taking in light from a wider field of view, but it's not taking in any more light from anywhere within the frame itself. When you get into dedicated astrophotography cameras (Altair, QHY, ZWO, etc), you'll find that large-pixel, small-sensor (4/3 format and smaller) cameras are quite common. I have a QHY294C with 4.63 micron pixels and a 4/3 sensor, compared to my X-T1 which has nearly identical sized pixels at 4.76 microns but which has many more of them because it's APSC. Pixel size and SNR follows the same relationship as with lens f-stops, but in reverse: a 5.6 micron pixel has twice the area of 4 micron pixel which has twice that of a 2.8 micron pixel and so on. Now, in general, at any given point in time, cameras with larger sensors also tend to have larger pixels and so tend to have better low light performance than their smaller sensor brethren of the same generation. This is probably the source of this confusion. Additionally, to frame the same subject area, with a larger sensor you can use a longer focal length lens and its aperture (like actual aperture, in mm, not f-stop) will usually be greater, also allowing in more light which increases SNR (but if you use the same lens on both systems, as one would with a telescope, having a larger sensor doesn't furnish any light gain at the level of the individual pixel). So larger sensors allow the use of longer focal length lenses with larger apertures, but it's not the sensor in and of itself that's providing the light gain. As time goes on and sensor technology improves, camera makers have been gradually reducing pixel size to bump up resolution - in effect they've taken some of the gain in noise performance and exchanged it for a gain in resolution. Nevertheless, the gains in reducing noise have been so great that the smaller pixels on, for example, the X-T3 and X-T4 outperform the larger but older tech pixels on the X-T1. So camera makers could make much lower noise sensors than they are by simply keeping pixel sizes larger.

[@JM_2019]

It's actually both to a certain degree. Even if you have the same pixel pitch at APS-C and FF (and as a result of that a higher resolution with the FF sensor), noise artifacts are scaled down more with the higher resolution image if you display it at the same size.

[@youknowwho9247]

There are plenty of examples that prove this comment wrong. Some new full frame cameras have a higher pixel density than some APS-C cameras, yet the full frame wins by about a stop in low light preformance. What you're explaining is only relevant at one to one, at a pixel level - which is an utterly irrelevant metric for photography.

[@davidjames4915]

@@youknowwho9247 I covered this very issue in my last paragraph about newer tech sensors. The comment holds. You can't defeat the basic physics that a larger pixel always captures more light than a smaller pixel. As noise is random but signal isn't, as you make pixels smaller the noise has a greater chance of overwhelming the signal. Conversely, as pixel size grows, signal is ever more likely to overwhelm noise. Newer tech sensors have simply been reducing the sheer amount of random noise associated with them, but what noise there is is still going to show up less with larger pixels. Dedicated astrocameras usually have a 'binning' function that allow us to combine 2x2, 3x3 or even 4x4 arrays of pixels into acting as one for the express purpose of gathering more faint signal and reduce noise. So your claim that it's utterly irrelevant is demonstrably false.

[@youknowwho9247]

@@davidjames4915 Let's assume you're correct. Explain why several APS-C sensors with lower pixel densities than some full frame sensors from the same generation are all pretty much exactly one stop worse in noise performance than said full frame sensors. Also, explain why there is no significant correlation between resolution and noise performance among different full frame sensors of the same generation. Here's just one data point to illustrate: www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-A7R-IV-versus-Sony-a9-II___1326_1346 The lower pixel density sensor here is newer and inside a camera specifically designed to shoot at high ISO, which is also much more expensive, so it's fair to assume that there's no reason why the higher res sensor should have any tech advantage. In fact, according to you the lower res sensor should perform substantially better because of its larger pixels. However, that's not the case. While the a9 II does have an advantage at the pixel level - which is completely irrelevant in terms of photographic results - both cameras perform virtually identically at the same output size, which is the measurement that matters. To emphasise this one more time: I'm not saying you're wrong about the physics. I'm saying your points aren't relevant to the key question, which was "does sensor size affect the visible noise in a photograph". The empirical answer is yes, it absolutely does.

[@kobiorama]

Mark, I can see your beef with the R2, as I moved to the R3 which solved many of the problems regarding battery life, and some of the control quirks of the R2, also adding the joystick for focusing and so much more. However, since you are definately NOT saving any weight with the XT4, and the Fuji zoom lens looks almost as big as the sony, it appears you are trying to convince yourself that the move to Fuji is the right one based on lens weight. If you switch to the sony 16-35 F4, and get the new 100-400 from Sigma (I think) you will have a MUCH lighter gear set. You could also go with the Tamron lens lineup for sony which are extremely liteweight. Sony DR is something that you will miss. I moved from canon 6D (yes, I know.. lousy DR) but I barely ever need to bracket with the sony (R2 or R3) and you might need to go back to grad filters, and 5-7 frame bracekting, especially for high contract high DR landscape images. Enjoy the Fuji, and after a while try to give us an "objective" view of the switch :)

[@britainthroughmylens]

I just ditched my Canon outfit for an XT4 set up. This camera is beautiful and as you said, a lot of fun to use in the old school photography manner. Just love those dials. You’re in good company, just watched Tom Heaton using XT in Iceland. He left his 5DIV at home for the same reasons.

[@zHeadless]

Welcome to the Fuji family! Proud owner of an XT4 here and loving it ;-)

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thank you!!

[@PatriciaDavidsonPhotography]

Well now your talking! ;) If you want more megapixels just do a pano, works for me.

[@alanhumbard8298]

Just in case I would recommend you not to sell your Sony System until you’ve used it for awhile. I sold my Fuji System a year ago and am glad.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

I've been using the X-T3 for over a year now for all the video work for this channel and it's been perfect for what I need - I'm a fan to say the least:)

[@peterlames]

I love my Fuji X-T3 for video...but if I had really known how painfull this X-Trans sensor for photography is (especially in lightroom) and all the workarounds because of this...I propably would have invested in a Sony FF/Tamron combination.

[@Kcignatius]

@@peterlames can you elaborate on that? Thinking about the Fuji and this is the first I've heard about Lightroom issues.

[@SkyGW]

@@Kcignatius Lightroom has trouble with fuji raws, Capture one does a much better job with it but most people are invested in lightroom

[@alanhumbard8298]

@@peterlames I traded my Fuji XT-2 in for a Sony A7r-iv and I couldn't be happier. I never got the images out of Lightroom that I did with my Nikon D810. I've keep the Nikon for some specific occasions but mostly use my Sony. I hope Mark doesn't regret this move. I know from watching his videos (he's the best) that he uses Lightroom.

[@angeloregina]

Good explanation of your choice. High end APS-C camera give you the same capabilities of entry - level and midrange fullframe cameras.

[@SteveMellorPhotography]

Congratulations on making the switch and welcome fully to the club 😉

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Many thanks Steve!

[@heisenberg9616]

No, sorry going from such a beast of a camera with those killer lenses does not make sense to me but glad you are happy with your decision.

[@ryan6465]

None of your justifications make any sense except for that you enjoy using the Fuji more.

[@stephenhadeenphotography]

Looking forward to watching this. I’m contemplating a move to Fuji system

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Hope you enjoy it Steve

[@doeunsama5375]

Thinking the same with the x-t3 10 bit 422 looks enticing and the 18-55 kit lens is marvelous too and its currently 1399 for that combo the price of just my a7iii if i sell it plus i got a few lenses so i can always pick up the 23 and 35 f2 which i also heard good things about

[@thotsofficial3171]

One of my favorite photographer! Welcome to Fujifilm family 🤩👏👏 looking forward for more vids and pictures to your Fuji cam.😍

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Thanks so much!!

[@wesleylow3632]

I recently switched from FX Nikon to XT4. I don't even shoot video. The size, weight, Fuji ergonomics and film simulations were the main reasons, and like you said, probably wasn't using all the advantageous of the FX. Probably one of the biggest obstacles to overcome is the thought process of the FX standard and always wanting more. The Fuji system does the job for me. I hope you enjoy your switch, I know your back does! What pack are you thinking about now?

[@wojtekw6040]

I have switched to fuji 2 or so years ago after traveling with FF Nikon for a month. I also did it for same reasons: 11kg back then vs 6kg now and fun of using Fuji and that gives me more photos, more quality (old Nikon vs new Fuji). Also I might add longer reach for wildlife with lighter gear, affordable high quality lences, I do take astro photos, macro, studio and never missed Full Frame. The only things are: Cupture One is a must, acquiring same bokhe requires more effort. But hey, if it`s good for masters like You or Andy Mumford it`s great for me.

[@ioanniskostopoulos1210]

Hey! Great video again! I did that switch myself a few months ago and I am not regret it at all. Will you stick with lightroom or will you switch to something like capture one for better raw output?

[@ibarrabenjamin1]

This video resonates with me a lot! I’ve been shooting Fuji for 7 years now. I thought it was time to move to FF and I got a a7riii. Tested both, Fuji an Sony side by side, taking the same images at same focal length. Printing images from both cameras and, as you have pointed out before, the difference is really small. Also, Fuji handles much better and after si many years, it is hard to find that the lens doesn’t have the aperture ring, or push buttons instead of turning dials. This is the second time I’ve tried to ditch Fuji without success. Regarding dynamic range, Fuji has a trick, which is DR mode. I found that I can get better highlights recovery with the Fuji raw files than the Sony”s. I recommend you try it,. Enjoy your Fuji cameras! And I look forward to seeing what you can produce with them!

[@tonibeltran7420]

Thanks Mark for another great video.As a beginner ,I made the decision to start and invest in micro 4/3 for size and portability, knowing its limits with low light, by now so happy with it.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Many thanks Toni!

[@wolfsheadphotographic2521]

I switched to Fuji from Nikon full frame last year. I’ve never regretted it!

[@davemckenzie426]

I made a similar switch 6 months ago. I sold all of my Nikon full frame equipment and went with the XT-3. Since I don't shoot video. I have two XT-3 bodies, the 10-24, 16-80 and 100-400 lenses. It is fun to hike western NC with my camera gear again. The light weight is great.

[@stephenschmid492]

Very interesting, Mark! Great to have another member of the Fujifilm community. When I purchased my first "serious" digital camera in 2017, I went with the X-T20 rather than the X-T2 because I really needed to keep my gear weight down due to my physical limitations. X-T20 had the same sensor and processing as the X-T2, without some of the features like dual card slots and weather sealing. (I hear rumors that there will be an X-T40. I don't like the fact that they removed the "D-Pad" in the X-T30.) I have been happy with my Fujifilm image. My first 35mm film SLR camera back in the day (1977) was a Canon A-E1, which I used for many years. When digital started, and I was raising kids, I used Canon point-and-shoots for many years, which I liked. So if I hadn't developed my physical issues, I probably would have been using Canon DSLR's. Even now, I entertain thoughts of having a Canon R5. But I am able to hike while carrying my X-T20 and 3 lenses (10-24, 18-55, 55-200), and I doubt the equivalent would be possible with an R5. If I feel I can ever afford it, maybe an R5 or other full frame could be a camera I use "out of the car" rather than for walks and hikes.

[@Zeichentrick01]

I switched to Fujifilm in 2017. Right now I am using X-T20 and X-T3 paired with a 10-24, 50-140 (didn't want to use the 55-200 because it expands when zooming which I don't like when using filters), 100-400, 1.4Tc and Samyang 12mm for the milkyway. You should think about switching to Capture One for your stills. You will be blown away by the image quality compared to lightroom. As well it is a very versatile software you will rarely find yourself using PS anymore, except for exposure blending or focus stacking.

[@GABRIELSANTOS-ic3ei]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. I have an A7iii that I use for landscapes and portraits. I picked up an xt-2 some time ago while on sale and fell in love with it using for landscapes. I know my dynamic range is better in the sony but I always reach for the fugi. I'm trying now to use the fugi for my portrait work and think I can make it work. I don't have the funds yet to upgrade from the "kit" 18-55 and 55-200 but they both have OIS so that helps me greatly with the xt-2. Its been a tough decision but your perspective really helped. Thanks.

[@jaredloomis9674]

I'll be interested to follow you and see as time progresses if you enjoy or regret your system switch. Best of luck to you and as always, see you next Wednesday!

[@olewiseone1079]

I absolutely love my Fuji X-T3! Paired with the XF16mm f1.4 or XF100-400 with 1.4x teleconverter, I get fantastic images straight out of the camera.