Top 5 Concerns for Battlefield 2042...

[@PattycakesGG]

What concerns do you have for BF 2042? I'd love to hear from you :) Watch this next: 11 Things Battlefield 2042 NEEDS to be S-Tier kzbin.info/www/bejne/pJa0m2tpZ9KrqcU

[@thefazbearfuncorner1632]

I wonder if there’s gonna be special equipment, like in battlefield 5, that you can call in, or since there are attachments now, if you can call in supply drops….. can’t wait to see!

[@justarandompersoniguess]

Literally the majority of the concerns for me is just the specialists, that’s it

[@dalefitzgerald4369]

Custom servers again would be cool

[@aa-kz7hc]

i heard that you can pick any gagdets that you want. so instead of vehicles being overpowered i think they are gonna underpowered. 128 players and they can all pick rocket launchers to get rid of you.

[@Twistshock]

With how massive the maps are, I feel like snipers sitting 1km away from any objective doing buggerall are going to be more abundant.

[@mirzaredzepovic8779]

My biggest concern is the cosmetics for the game. I feel like if someone could slap all pink on their specialist, it'd take away from that battlefield feel. I hope they don't go in that direction, and keep the camos we all know and love.

[@PattycakesGG]

I think they will keep them more true to the BF vibe

[@deathwish-gg8wz]

i mean right now the skins are just different colored camos

[@LewisBritten]

I hope that actually have skins u can unlock thru challenges rather than just store based cosmetics

[@zelthina]

Hope they keep it somewhat "real". Some of the skins in BFV was a bit outlandish.

[@AnonEMus-cp2mn]

The ranked camo system of BF3 was phenomenal because if you saw a player wearing black for instance, you knew they were Veteran rank and very experienced.

[@lazarusthibodeaux]

Directly from DICE: The matchmaking will be the same as it ever was.

[@jeremysolomon2029]

Does that mean SBMM?

[@sneakybirb7901]

@@jeremysolomon2029 Thankfully, only a little bit. Battlefield has always had some kind of sbmm but the lobbies were never cod lobbies.

[@peppa1492]

@@jeremysolomon2029 technically if you want to just play casually you can play against bots.

[@jeremysolomon2029]

@@peppa1492 yeah but that’s boring

[@nighthawk_]

@@jeremysolomon2029 No, it won't be SBMM. I'd assume it'll be like BF4 with a possible auto team balance, meaning that the games will hopefully be closer and one team won't just be absolutely dumpstered. Players skill will vary greatly in-game.

[@zainhafeez631]

My biggest concerns from least to biggest 5. Server lag 4. Overload of explosives since every class has them 3. Specialists 2. Specialists customization and being able to customize them into bf3-Bf4 soldiers 1. Skill based matchmaking

[@Wellshem]

skill based matchmaking is pure shit, full of smurf at low mmr and full of cheater at high mmr

[@SOUNDWAVEPR]

5: server lag im afraid to say you may never fix. Unless EA and Dice is willing to spend a shit ton of money and time to make the game perfect then maybe but it will probably never happen. 4: is explosions that big of a deal to you? I get that every class is going to use them but goddam in BF4 it feels like 90% of people use engineer class and spam rocket launchers all the time and still doesn’t break the game lol in an actual play perspective and server perspective. 3: specialist are nothing new. Basically specialists are just classes that have some sort of background story and is able to carry a unique gadget and have fewer restrictions on what they can do and use. 2: JackFrags already confirmed that you are able to customize your specialist to look like a solider on the battlefield. And even without JackFrags confirming it, if you checked out the pre order packagers some do look like actual soldiers and I’m pretty sure In the future they will probably add some BF4/3 cosmetic skins or some shit. 1: Depends on your sort of view. Some people view this as bad or good. If you are a bad player and tend to get absolutely destroyed then this can 100% be a plus for you. But let’s say you do good a couple of games and all of a sudden you are in a tryhard sweaty match where people are abusing the shit out of certain stuff or are just being sweaty then this could be look downed upon and be a negative.

[@LAIRA3040]

My biggest concern is that vehicles will take over the game. But that’s really it

[@matiaszxzxv5]

you can put a rocket launcher to any soldier in this battlefield, i think this will balance the great amount of vehicles in this game.

[@LAIRA3040]

@@matiaszxzxv5 wait are u serious?

[@halomaster366]

@@LAIRA3040 BF4 and BF3 Dude it ain't that hard to blow up a tank.

[@LAIRA3040]

@@halomaster366 I know but it’s still kind of annoying when u want to play infantry and get annihilated by vehicles. Especially as an Assault or Support

[@LAIRA3040]

@@halomaster366 in BF4 and 3

[@UDoIt2]

You know your winning when you see footage from a game you played with PattyCakes!

[@PattycakesGG]

Haha you were an amazing tank driver! Proud to be your gunner any day

[@haventakalou6530]

Awww

[@everdownwardandon7124]

Really hope they keep the cosmetics consistent with the tone of the game. I don't know about anyone else, but I personally don't want to get killed by someone with a bright pink anime waifu AK-12.

[@ididntaskverified3663]

The cosmetics would not be the pink anime waifu gun, but choosing the waifu on it

[@nonskitv8218]

Hey thats me

[@thefaithfulwisp6272]

I mean its pretty obvious cosmetics would be more or less not soo goofy like some cod games, take bf5 for example and bf 1 their soldiers had the most badass outfit both accurate and non accurate at the same time

[@justarandompersoniguess]

@@thefaithfulwisp6272 yeah even the less accurate ones possibly were still not over the top crazy, they still made sense

[@val5756]

Like i see your point but when i say that is the LAST thing you should be worried about

[@keefkeef6]

It’s amazing how you keep coming out with high quality videos without repeating known topics. Keep up the good work, your channel is doing great!

[@PattycakesGG]

Thanks! Anything you’d like to see me cover soon?

[@keefkeef6]

@@PattycakesGG Not off the top of my head, I just hope they get upgrades right, felt like sometimes BF4 unlocks were kinda grindy if you're new and 5 didn't have much customization on attachments. But we didn't see any huge levolutions in the gameplay trailer and I really want lots of it.

[@vorobyovs]

I agree with every single sentence! Dice! If you are watching this video, please, do what this guy says!

[@Zephyr_Phoenix76]

"Cheating has ruined the competitiveness Destiny 2" People still play Destiny 2 PvP?

[@Dogma14]

A lot of people

[@Zephyr_Phoenix76]

@@Dogma14 define a lot in destiny?

[@nicobenji0248]

@@Zephyr_Phoenix76 Depends on your region I imagine that it's enough to find a PvP match lol. If we're talking numbers compared to other multiplayer games then not a lot

[@Zephyr_Phoenix76]

@@nicobenji0248 Well it doesn't matter in the end Destiny is practically on Life support

[@ManBaguette]

@Daniel Bandura-Cadle nothing new or good but we are all addicted

[@yuvalgabay1023]

Him: no bf game had a stable launch in a fuck long time! Bf Hardline crying in the Connor again

[@blake6242]

for real that game was honestly slept on. loved the concept and the unique additions like hanging out of cars and zip lines. was an awesome game

[@capolean2902]

@@blake6242 the hanging out the car reminds me of gta 4 online

[@getjacked1]

Instead of buying the best shit “pay to win” you’ll have to survive hazard zone. Loot the best shit survive and extract in order to keep it….. hopefully

[@SOUNDWAVEPR]

Well so far DICE has been keeping a Hold on EA like a dog when it came to cosmetics and PTW shit. Let’s just hope they can do it again

[@ahadquadri5471]

Dude... this would be such a cool way to gain items, and actually make hazard zone all the more worthwhile to play.

[@HoshinoMirai]

Then this creates a negative cycle, when only the best players gets to win the mode and keep the best items, and then they join another game only to be better than everyone else equipment-wise, gaining more advantage as they play.

[@getjacked1]

@@HoshinoMirai you can extract from the map at anytime. So you loot something you like, go to the extraction point, you leave. Just have to make sure you don’t get killed on the way out.

[@HoshinoMirai]

@@getjacked1 wouldn't this encourage camping at the extraction point? why go around the map and search stuff and risk getting killed along the way when you can just wait for someone who did all the work for you and ambush them and loot them instead?

[@Theakboyy]

You guys realize the usmc is already testing MULE robots as a squad based well pack mule

[@boinjamoin_860]

My biggest concern is the maps. Some of the maps seem to be pretty big, and I'm just afraid there won't be as much action.

[@plyxxi]

dont worry my friend since the maps are big the objectives have 4 smaller objectives inside of it so there is more action

[@ABulgrin84]

@@plyxxi and don’t forget the fact that the player count has doubled. If anything action will be the same and/or more in previous battlefields

[@mrbruh7318]

My concern is specialists, don't get me wrong it a cool concept but I feel we should customize our character and not have the copy and paste character running around

[@deathwish-gg8wz]

you can customize them. how are so many people still unaware of that?

[@LewisBritten]

Would be cool if they did it so each specialist would have faction specific cosmetics

[@LewisBritten]

@@deathwish-gg8wz I think it’s more a concern of differentiation of sides within the game…. seeing the same player model as your own on the opposite team would ruin immersion imo

[@mrbruh7318]

@@LewisBritten yea and that too because if a specialists is meta then everyone well use that character and in every map you well see that specialists every time

[@cj6498]

@@LewisBritten I'm gonna be honest, I have never used uniforms to identify enemies in battlefield.

[@yuvalgabay1023]

My biggest one is the every weapon/gadget to everyone. This could very easily make everything incredibly unbalance and boring

[@deathwish-gg8wz]

battlefield 4 basically gave everyone every gun. and if everyone can use rockets it makes vehicles less op. also how is everyone having the exact same things unbalanced?

[@phoenixfullthrottle3846]

@@deathwish-gg8wz That's the problem if every class can use a rocket launcher vehicles wouldn't stand a chance in hell.

[@yuvalgabay1023]

@@deathwish-gg8wz unbalanced in a viechel vs Infentry Way/gaudget and weapons raltion ship. And bf4 had that to a lesser amount but it's still was shit. Like whan bf H got out everybody include my self where happy they limited the gun choice. It's was a good desion. And last thing getting the viechel vs Infentry raltionship balance will be hard. Or they will(viechels) be op as fuck or insta die

[@bjorn4884]

I feel like there is not point for SBMMV in 2042 acusé when you play with teams of 64 it is good to have diverse still levels

[@thefazbearfuncorner1632]

You are awesome at doing this, when Battlefield 2042 comes out for me, I’ll always come to your videos for reference! Keep working hard! 😁😊

[@nicobenji0248]

So I learnt that the any AT rocket combined with AA mines is a great way to combat both vehicles and to keep them from becoming overbalanced in terms of numbers. Place AA mines hidden near a highly contested point. It'll most likely disable/crash the enemy helicopters. AT rockets speak for themselves. Lol I like the STRAW after getting skilled with it you can occasionally take out enemy air or at least keep them from stabilizing and getting an easy kill on you.

[@1kaydo]

good video man. i am also concerned about the vehicles since i mainly like to play infantry

[@PattycakesGG]

Same for me, although I’ve been trying to learn the vehicles better in BF4 lately to improve with them

[@DustinHarms]

Good word on SBMM, and I hope it's heard. From back in BF2, I had the same experience seeing those high scores and better players. I didn't mind getting wrecked. It made me play to my strengths, support those around me that were better, and making some really memorable experiences when I had a good run. I'd love to see an absence of SBMM in BF2042. =)

[@michaelcaley1359]

Agree. SBMM caters to new players but damages your long term fan base. It is a byproduct of this new gen mentality. Everyone wants to be the best 360 no scope TTV sweat boy now... Noone wants to put the work in and actually learn a skill set. Im huge into Apex Legends and have been since release but due to its horrible SBMM system and the fact that I've been playing so long it is impossible to have an enjoyable game. Every game is a sweat fest and you have to be on your shit all the time. It is sooo exhausting.... I really hope BF focuses more on team balance and not a true SBMM system like some of our current shooters.

[@Derekorbe1]

Major issues lol, this is dice and ea. We will see bugs, bad hertz/shot behind walls, broken weapons, broken gadgets, broken specialists, broken vehicles, anyone else want to add to the list of common BF issues at launch?

[@ManBaguette]

I don't see the problem with broken weapons if everyone can use them, it will just fuck over all the other weapons. I'd prefer broken shit than poor servers

[@Derekorbe1]

@@ManBaguette ik what you mean. I was playing cod during the mw2 days and we had integrity not to exploite the op weapons

[@MindFluxx]

Another great vid! U brought up a lot of great points that most big battlefield youtubers just glance over, I’m in the minority but I hope bullet velocity is NOT like bf4, I understand why it was so low in bf4 but I’m hoping due to the big maps coming to 2042 we can get a sniping experience more like warzone

[@PattycakesGG]

Thanks! Yeah I personally don't love the super low bullet velocity either, especially if we're gonna be on massive maps

[@blake6242]

you don't like the realism eh? i personally love that there's a range finder and range settings on the snipers in bf4. made the sniping much more satisfying when you can watch the bullet travel thru the map and headshot ur target. also made the sniping require more skill which i enjoy

[@MindFluxx]

@@blake6242 How is 600m/s bullet velocity realistic on a sniper rifle? Sniper rifles in real life and in warzone travel 1000+m/s and if we’re going to have massive maps, 600m/s sniper rifles like in bf4 would be ridiculously hard to use in bf 2042

[@blake6242]

@@MindFluxx 600 is still realistic, im sure it will be adjusted but it would be best if what the same just slightly scaled up

[@blake6242]

600m/s is the low end btw, not all snipers are the same in the game

[@zerodark3505]

I think casual doesn’t need sbmm as long as team balancing evens out both teams

[@phoenixfullthrottle3846]

My biggest concern is the specialist system. I'm a big hardcore player and the idea of the same character model on different teams breaks the immersion for me in my opinion. Not to mention the confusion of who's friendly or enemy can lead to endless turkey shoots.

[@beanladder281]

Actually that visibility is not much of an issue, elites in BFV had not much of a problem with visibilty

[@NotRealAkira]

@@beanladder281 Hardcore wasn't in that game though

[@EmeraldDuke]

For the vehicles that just sound like a bad team not really the games fault.

[@someoneschannel4420]

This channel is amazing you do such a great job take a screenshot now and your channel after bf2042 comes out your gonna pop

[@PattycakesGG]

Thank you! I’m so excited for 2042 :)

[@reshanbiran6873]

When I see the cyber dog it reminds me how overpowered the horses are in bf1

[@rukrosmansgaming8972]

hopefully, the cosmetics won't give any advantage like in warzone the roze skin

[@cadebeitia6991]

I don’t think vehicles will be overpowered because of the fact that everyone can carry a rocket launcher with the new specialist system to counter vehicles 🚗

[@adamwiggins5777]

They can carry C4 as well. If anything, I think tanks will be death traps

[@Future_Doggo]

Uh oh

[@mylittlenukacola1932]

Battlefield 5 has the option to pick your own server but you just need to find it, it's called advanced search in the multiplayer screen (pick map, mode, world area (so Europe, Asia etc) and other normal bf picks.

[@wagwarn3957]

My only concern is the new Specialist system I just want to be a generic soilder.

[@ideenlos9242]

imagine the queue times with sbmm with 128 players lmao

[@awskiba2000]

Point 5 is scary for me, especially with EA. Sticking to a battle pass will be really nice, and I would love if more developers thought about something along the lines of Halo's non-expiring battle pass which I'm very positively surprised by, especially because it takes away the grind factor and the 'fear of missing out'

[@RichSmithson]

Things im concerned about 1) New Class System 2) That AI bots will take up empty slots on servers (Cant we just have a smaller player base till the server fills?) I think this will lead to people farming bots or if the bots are too good they will get annoying when you are getting sniped from across the map by a damn bot 3) Cosmetics getting ridiculous turning the game into Fortnite 4) The Plot/Lore of factions instead of nations. Id rather have the old USA vs China vs Russia theme we had from BF4 and to a lesser degree BF3 (China wasn't in BF3 but there were indications they would enter the war) 5) It being a repeat of BF4s launch. Where it wouldnt work for a week, then it did but had bad connection, and then we had months of game breaking bugs that had to be fixed. Apart from that im hyped as hell.

[@drago8664]

My biggest concern is balance because now any class can have any weapon/ gadget meaning most people will just use the most op weapon along with an RPG to cover themselves against vehicles. But that doesn't mean I'm not excited and hoping it'll be like bf 4 just better

[@Aknayelth]

I dont like being pushed with a team with noobs everytime, i hope this doesnt happen too often like battlefield v.

[@Owen-fn8ff]

My main concerns are: 1. The storm: who actually asked for this? How would you feel if your team was winning but suddenly this storm comes along and wipes all your vehicles, letting the other team win. I think after the first “wow” moment it’s just going to be a PITA. 2. Old gen support: this is a real cop out. It heavily limits performance and destruction in the base game. Could please finally have a game made for a bloody ssd?? 3. Vehicles: as a team player, a regular engineer in BF4 and always repairing or supporting vehicles, I love the fact that they will have 4-5 specialised seats. Good squads will absolutely have a blast. The issue is see that a lot of people who could call one, just won’t as they are too difficult to drive. And so due to balancing, that team will lose. 4. Gimmicks: zip lines, wing suits, robo dogs I can just see how sweaty some of these lobbies are going to be. 5. Bots: this sounds great but also feels like an excuse. “Hey because of SBMM the rounds are too difficult for you? You don’t’ like hackers? Because of the lack of support that we will provide to your region you can’t get a good game and the experience 80 dollars we charged for? Go play with bots! Do we really think bots are going to make for a fun gameplay experience? They are either op laser eyes sharpshooters or incredible stupid. Why don’t dice just guarantee support or offer to lease servers? As a European living in Japan, I’m going to totally wait to see what the support is like before paying nearly a hundred bucks. I love the franchise and still play bf4 regularly so I’m hoping I’m proved wrong on all counts! But I think bf1 and bfv have given me the right to be cyclical :) Good vide by the way!

[@Grantykinss]

I’m not sure how no one is concerned or talking about gadget balance between classes, it could potentially be extremely broken allowing any class to take any second gadget, now when I look at a recon he could be carrying an RPG, there’s nothing to define classes anymore. Instead of no soldier being a one man army, every soldier has the potential to be, IMO could be very hard to balance this, snipers camping with ammo constantly resupplying, any problems that BF4 faced with soldiers really cheesing the game will be exaggerated x10.

[@rebelsoldier284]

I agree with all of your concerns, plus a couple more. My main concern is the removal of the traditional combat class system and implementing the 'Hero', 'Legend' or 'Operator' style system. Pair that with the Open Gadget system and all class of weapons being available across the board. I personally believe this for lack of a better word, kills the whole class base system that Battlefield is known for. This also ruins immersion for a lot of people, from what I've seen. As the meme'd comments say, "I can't wait to come across 20 Marias' and 30 Boris'". Don't get me wrong, I understand that the generic soldiers from previous titles looked Identical as well. I get that. That's why I am in favor of soldier customization so we can make our soldiers our own. But at this rate, we'll probably see a Casper with this color Ghillie, and then a Casper with this color face paint and then another Casper in civilian style clothing. And along with the Specialist system, comes the unique traits, both active and passive being combined with the open gadgets and open weapon loadouts. I see a huge opening for META to run rampant. Possibly worse than what we hear about in WarZone. I would be more excited for the game if we had the traditional classes and traditional weapon and gadget . But I've been playing Battlefield since the BF3 days. It's just what I'm accustom to.

[@Mickocarbomb]

I'm just excited for Damavand peak returning.

[@Yupyupyeet]

Vehicles have always been a unfair problem if you don't run assault you're screwed whenever you see a tank.

[@connorbreit2035]

I just hope the cosmetics aren’t too extreme and wacky. I just want to play as a cool not to extreme soldier with gear which would include helmet, body armor, face coverings, etc.

[@TaylorBrisk]

My biggest concern is if it will be 120 fps. I don't give a shit about anything else

[@arakami8547]

The things I'm most worried for with 2042 is the apparent unlimited ammo of tanks; one thing that BFV got right was with its vehicles. That would be an easy fix though. What wouldn't be easy to fix would be in regards to the specialists. I really think it would have been better to ditch the specialist names; they shouldn't be individual heroes, they should be nameless soldiers -- that would help emit feelings of all-out war. That, or removal of classes, replaced with the creation of individual soldiers/loadouts again nameless though with the option to choose those unique gadgets or gadget sets. Considering primary weapons are now no longer locked, that seems like a good option. Anyway, the current specialist models could be made rarer through a Paywall so you don't see 12 Espinozas on-screen at once, basically doing what BFV did. That or scrapping them entirely, which almost certainly won't happen.

[@thebulletkin8393]

I’ve been working on getting better in games for the last few months, and while I have a ways to go I love watching my own progression which is why I am against any kind of skill based matchmaking. There’s always one or two god infantry players in servers but instead of claiming ‘it’s unfair’ or ‘they’re hacking’ I instead aspire to be more like them and push myself to do even better.

[@apeblackberry3641]

I have 3 major concerns about the game: 1. Overall balance/specialist system. You were briefly talked about how you worried about infantry gameplay because of the vehicles but I'm on the exact opposite side of this spectrum. I'm a massive BF fan and I love the vehicles in this game. However, the fact that the new Specialist system allows for every unit to carry whatever equipment they like is extremely worrying. I'm afraid one little mistake and they will completely make vehicle gameplay irrelevant. The last thing I want is 132 players chockful of explosives and rocket launchers. I'm mainly an Attack Helicopter pilot and my worst nightmare is to deal with a group of snipers camping rooftops, loaded with IGLA's on top of the already existing AA units, enemy aircraft, and regular engineers with their respective rocket launchers. Even if you are on land, just think about a scenario where at least 30 players with RPG's camping a base. Not even 10 tanks could get even close to that let alone 1-2. As I said, I'm extremely nervous about the balance of the game, and I'm hoping for similar results as BF3 had back in the day. 2. Old, Outdated business model. The ending of the trailers makes me even nervous because it's clear that they selling the game in 3 different editions, and some of this mentions a Season Pass or DLC content. I really don't like that. I think selling DLC's and Premium (maps, weapons) is an incredibly dumb idea. Make the best content unavailable for anyone who only has the base game is a really outlandish idea. A community that supports the game deserves to have the full content of a game, and this especially true in multiplayer games where the player count matters. I think a game in 2021 should be a focus on uniting its player base rather than dividing them into little pieces. 3. The lack of Battleroyale presence. That's undeniable that Battleroyale exploded in recent years and it's still growing at a fast rate. Whether people like it or not, I believe that this should be a standard game mode in any multiplayer shooters in 2021. Before some people jump at my throat, I want to say that I DO NOT WANT TO REPLACE standard battlefield game modes, but I would fully expect a BR game mode as an option. The reason behind it is simple: It's popular. Games that have this, most likely die at a way slower rate because of the increased player count. Also, for those who play battle royale, the was a majority of them would try regular game modes which are good. In other words, Battle royale = Endless supply of fresh players, which can lead this game to thrive in a long run. That being said, It's extremely worrisome, and feels like a huge missed opportunity. It's like you find a gold mine and leave it to the dust.

[@ODZZplays]

If they add SBMM, that is the stupidest move possible they could do. What makes battlefield fun is that you don’t have to try hard to have fun, but with SBMM you HAVE to play for your life otherwise you can’t have fun at all. Plus, 128 players makes win/loss virtually random, so SBMM wouldn’t make sense at all

[@tapersugar]

I am personally not concerned with tanks or APCs because everyone can have a rocket launcher honestly concerned that tanks might be able to get destroyed to easy

[@karsonwright6332]

The server browser pretty much eliminates SBMM

[@aiden_leven]

Finally, some good content.

[@krazy9783]

I feel like I'm the only one worried about the specialist system. Having the same 10 or so characters running around a map with over 100 players feels like it betrays battlefield norms, not to mention it will be weird having models that aren't tied down to a specific nation/team, and potentially running into enemies that are literally the same person as you. I've always enjoyed the immersive aspects of battlefield and unless I misunderstood something this completely ruins that. The other thing I'm worried about is the fact that you can use any weapon and any gadget no matter the class, meaning 1: classes don't mean anything and are just a way to categorize specialist, and 2: this could lead to very unbalanced loadouts and metas that lead to you picking something for it's power rather than how fun it is. I love the sandbox feel of bf4 but this is pushing it and makes me wonder if it will even feel like a battlefield game or just a large game of call of duty but with vehicles.

[@peterwilkinson1975]

I don’t know if they can do that just because of the server size. There might not be enough players to do something like that. I would say team balancing based on a skill rating would probably be the best of both worlds.

[@noahslaughter1733]

I’m just worried about how in game weapn customization will affect the game play of the game ! That and how this new class system will play out ....

[@MarcosAntonio-vf3ln]

I haven’t had fun playing team death match in battlefield since battlefield 3. Everyone remembers what a blast noshahr canals was and I remember just spending so many nights fucking up my sleep schedule not getting enough sleep for school to play team death match all night long.

[@iKnownot999]

@7:16 I'm pretty sure I've seen that footage used in a different vid of yours lol. My main concerns are the balancing of having 8 attachment options w/ no attachment too, seems like if you have a decent AR you can literally use it an any scenario in that case, when it used to be that you could outplay someone if you knew their loadout roughly. Other than that agreed with high skill vehicle Vs high skill infy should be more even, as BF4 has aged the dominance of vehicles has just grown and bf games have had great infy play. What I don't understand is the complaints about identical looking specialists when that has been the case for every bf game I've played except there were 4 specialists per country (medic, eng, support, recon)

[@PattycakesGG]

Haha yeah it was the only clip I could find quickly that showed bugs from my gameplay

[@Snipex01ITA]

My only concern is fps lag since I play on PS4, but I'm sure DICE will take care of it. Or at least I hope

[@deathwish-gg8wz]

they already did by making it 64 players on smaller maps

[@british15]

My biggest concern is still universal primary weapons, just don't see how this is a good idea in the slightest

[@n8ivspat3n56]

I feel like as long as the robot dog doesn’t have a stupid powerful mini gun or grenade launcher a 7.62 or 50 cal is okay it could make an interesting aspect trying to take a building or objective if there aren’t any tanks or helis

[@pomzieee9373]

i think one of my biggest concerns are that snipers will get little to no variation again, unlike most guns, the snipers are so similar its more just a choice in looks at that point, i think itd be cool to have bigger differences, even at the trade off for less snipers, like (just an example for how they could be varied), 3 snipers, 1 sniper is big, heavy and clunky, youre slower while carrying it and its sway is very noticeable when you havent deployed its bipod, however the sniper is also very powerful, and can kill in one hit on the body, same for the head from say, 500m out, but with a much slower muzzle velocity. then sniper 2, the very opposite, light, compact, best at ranges like 100m out, however, the trade off being its not particularly powerful, needing 3 shots to kill on the body, 1 for the head as its still a sniper, then theres the classic sniper, evenly balanced for size and power, and that would be the same as a usual bf sniper. obvs these arent definitive, and there is flaws in the design but theyre just ideas for how you could utilise the snipers and have them for different playstyles, especially with the new specialist system

[@droop05]

My only concern with this game is their support because the latest battlefield games hasn’t been supported and developed to their fullest potential because they start on a new ip every few years.

[@kristo5521]

Problem with bf4 was that vehicles were too easy to take out, I hope vehicles stay more like in old school battlefields and bf5. What is the point if single infantry can kill a tank. Infantry can spawn almost everywhere after death, tank has to drive all way through the map.

[@Jsobone]

Totally agree with a lot of these points. SBMM has no home in a game like battlefield. I also hope that the game not being free will disuade cheaters as well. Cheating in warzone blew up when the game went f2p.

[@bf3knifer]

with SBMM its almost as if players need 3 levels to choose from, noob only (enforced by stats), pro only (enforced by stats) and dont care - and the lobby enforces this, for a private rental, the admin can choose the level - i notice you didnt speak about private rentals

[@davelee4464]

For the cheaters, we need more aggressive move, just jail anyone buy and use cheat, not just the cheat makers only. Make cheating become a criminal act and enforcing it properly is the only way making cheat in tolerable state for pc gaming.

[@russian_knight]

I don't think cheating should be considered criminal, that sounds like a bit of an excessive punishment for a guy who just cheated in a video game

[@khahlis]

that’s a bit too much of a punishment, for cheating on a game

[@brilobox2]

Fines equal to the sum of the full price of the game for every single player a cheater is known to have interacted with ingame, as that is the number of player experiences that they’ve ruined makes more sense. Also, comprehensive IP bans.

[@wokedog1799]

The best anti vehicle weapons in Battlefield 4 are Recons, C4, and quad bikes; Change my Mind

[@SwagMessiah1]

Well we don't need to fear the matchmaking it seems since they have already said they are using a team balancing system rather than sbmm. It also baffles me how people think vehicles will be obsolete in this game. I hate using vehicles and I'm worried I'm going to be helpless against the 30 vehicles I'm up against.

[@n0yn0y]

I hope DICE doesn't turn vehicles into a powerup or a killstreak like in Battlefront 2. Vehicles shoould spawn at capture points and they should be free

[@stopbunsen]

Hoping that 2042 will be the first to have no significant day 1 issues. I had to laugh! It's probably a bad omen at this stage if it's all good day 1. I mean, yeah BF4 was seriously broken when it was released. But, now we hail it as one of the best Battlefield games ever. I remember even BF3 had issues at launch, and that's another stellar example. Also beta testing did absolutely fuck all to stop any of these games flopping at launch too

[@mjznerjujan1788]

I am concerned about AEK971 comming back

[@TrwuKiNg]

Anybody remember in MW where it was hard to find matches if you were half decent at the game.

[@AverageSealEnjoyer69]

I hate that some weapons are just literally not unlockable in Battlefield 4 because you need to do map specific things

[@SlyFoxl]

My concern is that as someone who loves to drive around in tank or ifv is that the sheer amount of possible enemies with means to do anti armor dmg is too strong. In bf4 it varies alot. Some games the tank is op but most games i stand no chance. All they need is a squad or few players dedicated to blow up vehicles and with their sraw/javelin and c4 combo im gone

[@pixelatedtoast]

this isnt related to the video but i just got back into battlefield after having terrible love-hate relationship with cod. How do u snipe so well? Do u have a tutorial video?

[@PattycakesGG]

I’m actually thinking about making one soon! I have been a huge fan of aim training and think I can make a really helpful guide for BF players

[@pinkdoe1725]

Pc or console

[@oguzhanbaharli7598]

Furta I was really excited and the reveal trailer was great but I don't like many changes they do so much that I lost much of the hype First of all I'm not a big fan of the setting, I'd rather have the game set in like 2022 or something I don't like the idea of Operators in Battlefield, I'd rather have the classes like in 4 and 1,also it takes away much freedom, for example in BF1 oyu could have the health pack and crait to double the Regen, the already destroyed that in BF5 where you had to chose either pack or crait Also I really don't like that every class can have every weapon, I'd rather have it like in 1 mayb elime in 4 I really don't like that you can order vehicles, I'd rather have it like in 4 maybe like in 1 I don't like that they change Qoquest and I'd rather have Operations like in 1 than Breakthrough, also I Anat Rush and something like War Pigeon, Dominion and TDM. Only 7 maps is really disappointing also they will be way bigger In general I don't want too big maps, of corse they have to e igger than in previous games but they only doubled the player count yet they make maps 4x as big, what is the point of mor ep layers if they will be more spread out anyway they'd rather make the Mas like 1.5 or 2x bigger I n the trailer we saw a revive animation, I don't want that, at least not for medics, for squad revives thats OK In general I don't want too many animatio like 5 had, I'd prefer rlike in 1 I don't want the Tornado to be unrealistic, what 8 mean is in Fortnite for example you could go into a tornado and fly to the air, I think it needs to kill if you are to close, but they denied that Also I don't like that you can change attachments on the Battlefield And I really don't. Like that there will be 3rd person view when you knive kill someone Also I don't like that there are soldiers without a Faction fighting for the US and Russia, it's probably only to sell more absurd skins instead of strict uniforms And I'd rather habe a season pass like in BF1 and Battlefront because BF5 and Battlefront 2 gave us so little amount of maps while Battlefield 1and Battlefront 1 had a lot of great maps, maybe to avoid to split the player base too. Much they could leave out single dlc and instead only give the entire premium available, so the players would be only split into 2 instead of 6 like in 1 BTW I think some of the maps don't look too great except for the snow one That said I still plan to buy the game near release and play it a lot

[@overlord5371]

Star wars Battlefront 2 had a very good comeback so maybe Battlefield 2042 will do the same if it doesn't have a good launch

[@renaicirculation4143]

What a very informative and well-researched video. You don't tackle useless topics like some people demanding a campaign or a battle royale.

[@PattycakesGG]

Thanks!

[@dusky2dawn]

I started on bf4 when bf5 had already been released I was such ass at the game but I happy I learned the hard way it made me a better player than if they had sbm

[@TROSSO24]

No 3rd person in vehicles except for a spotter position helps reduce strength of vehicles. I also agree cheating needs to be addressed.

[@rev603]

my biggest concern would the specialist tbh, i feel it will go the opposite way that DICE thinks it will go

[@hory-portier]

It would be nice if there was an unwritten rule for players to just leave the games instead of staying in it when a cheater is noticed and the game system could allow that without any penalty, so the cheater would be forced to play with never full servers and would just waste time trying to play. And the system would silently label them as cheaters for some verification and banning. If such thing became part of the mentality of all gamers in general, then cheating wouldn't be so fun anymore for the cheaters. But first the games would have to allow leaving for such reason with no penalty.

[@HoshinoMirai]

I mean I think allowing private servers and a way to highly customize the game from the admin side can give the players/host a lot of choices in mitigating these problems. Don't like skill-based match making? hop in a private server with friends to have some fun. Cheaters? reported and banned (hopefully). Vehicles too OP? Limit the amount of tanks available to each team and adjust their spawn time. Fingers crossed.

[@adrevenue726]

hey man, ya know you dont have to follow your target after you fire with the stinger, its flys to it anyway. you only have to do that with the igla.

[@PattycakesGG]

yeah I just do it for fun to practice tracking aim lol

[@elementofprgress]

Sitting here like damn, thought patty was one larger Destiny 2 channels, but only has 6k subs?? Then I realized Pattycakes != Pattycakes Gaming lol. Did you make this channel just for BF content?

[@PattycakesGG]

Haha yeah this is a brand new one to cover games like BF and maybe some other similar games

[@skwormyfatnuts7916]

I’m just concerned about the ttk (hopefully they learnt their lesson) and I’m also worried about the fact that you can choose whatever weapons with whatever specialists. I’m worried that everyone can have a rpg and it will just ruin the game.

[@C-Jay_Underground]

They will probably go back to a unrealistic ttk so everyone will be walking around like a one man army but in my opinion I really love the TTK in BFV!

[@legionliberator474]

Tornadoes will ruin the game, I know from past experiences. It looks cool at first, but then it gets annoying

[@TheYamyam97]

I want recoil on my weapons. I want my sight to go up when i shoot full auto. Bf5 is just boring. It's just uncontrollable spread but no recoil at all. I want skill-based shooting, not "i shot first you're dead" shooting. Less hip fire accuracy. Try shooting someone from the hip, 30m away in bf1 and bf3.

[@Monolith69]

sbmm made cod mw 2019 so hard for me to play because on one hand i loved the few casual matches i got when i got shit on constantly over and over until the game decided i wasn’t good enough where i could top frag while just relaxing and generally just enjoying the fluid movement mechanics and gunplay so if every time i search for a match i get matched with an entire conquest large lobby of sweaty try hards odds are i won’t even bother spending the 60$

[@Armin2208]

for better vehicle balance they should disable auto vehicle repair. this would be the best fix.

[@milaahrens9171]

The fact that there is a META is alrdy a minus point...put in SBMM but dont enforce a META...i wanna win bc i got better aim,positioning, forsight or 1 of many other things and not bc i got a stronger gun without recoil...

[@ZigzagEnd]

I wonder what pickupable weapons will be

[@nadrisk425]

Love ur channel man hope u get big one day

[@PattycakesGG]

Thanks!

[@FembyAnarchy_]

Major concerns for me is the possible lack of crossplay, especially since I play on console, and that if there's a meta weapon then everyone will use it like what happened to Warzone.

[@PattycakesGG]

I really think they will implement it, guess we will find out soon

[@deathwish-gg8wz]

crossplay is trash in shooters if its console to pc and Dice has always been great with balance

[@ExquisiteTopHat]

2:45 bfv lets you choose servers in advanced search

[@fisher3317]

This aged like wine 🍷

[@jayrents6648]

Hopefully the extra year of development will help the the launch bugs

[@ABulgrin84]

The only thing I’m worried about is customization. We saw Espanoza twice in the trailers looking completely different. Either that shows the crazy amount of customization or those were both pre set skins which I personally do not want. I feel if there is a higher customization of specialist, then it would scare away the fear of everyone looking the same due to the fact that everyone would have their own unique character customized to their liking. I also do not want hot pink and neon colors. I hope they stick to the tan/green/grey camo styles to keep that BF feel and not CoD ground war

[@deathwish-gg8wz]

well just his headgear changed and the medic changed her complete outfit 3 times. I think it will be bfv style. pants, shirt, head

[@ABulgrin84]

@@deathwish-gg8wz Still a lot better than pre set skins

[@cj6498]

I just gotta say, your experiences with SBMM are not universal. I wasn't robbed of progression with SBMM, I felt like I could actually play the game instead of getting stomped every single time. I was given progression, a place to actually experiment. Additional to that, you could go around beating people to death with a rock if you wanted to, because SBMM would put you in the same skill equivalent of using that rock, but you don't want to use the rock, you want to win, so you use meta and get matched with meta players as a result.

[@nicholasoconnell7732]

Kinda don't know how to feel about the specialist thing, but seems pretty cool

[@TheTummynator]

I disagree with the vehicle imbalance, they should obviously be punishing to teams who can't work together and destroy a tank.